DOCSLIB.ORG

NYC Parks Powerpoint Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NYC Parks Powerpoint Template NYC Tidal Marsh Assessment: Condition, Vulnerability and Restoration Opportunities Christopher Haight1, Marit Larson1, Rebecca Swadek1, Ellen K. Hartig1, Nicole Maher2, Stephen Lloyd2, Lauren Alleman2, and Helen M. Forgione3 NYC Parks - Natural Resources Group 1 The Nature Conservancy2 Natural Areas Conservancy 3 NCER April 20, 2016 Why Urban Coastal Wetlands • Coastal wetlands are a critical part of a livable NYC o resilient Park assets o aesthetic, recreational and educational value o ecosystem services (fisheries, bird communities, water quality) • Coastal wetlands are at risk • Planning, management and restoration can help protect our wetland assets for the future Historic NYC Wetland Extent Current NYC Tidal Wetlands Project Goals • Assess current marsh condition • Evaluate vulnerability (SLR) • Identify opportunities for protection, conservation & restoration Prioritize restoration & protection opportunities Ecological Assessment at 25 salt marshes Desktop Analysis o Historic Loss Long Analysis Island Sound o SLAMM Rapid Ecological Assessments o MidTRAM Marsh-wide Jamaica o Bay assessments Staten Island Identify key ecological attributes of marsh condition for which there are measurable indicator variables: Marsh area % Development in buffer Species richness Total cover Low marsh soil strength Breeding bird count Bare soil cover Pool expansion Ditch density 7 Identify key measurable indicators of vulnerability available from SLAMM outputs, field and desktop assessments Percent high marsh Marsh area Edge density Waterward loss Potential gain from migration Potential loss by SLR Idlewild Park, Queens, NY Salt marsh Recently lost salt marsh Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) Likelihood of Coastal Marsh 2080s Idlewild Park 10 Example – Saw Mill Creek Marsh, Staten Island Condition Marsh Area Native Species Richness Low Marsh Soil Strength Bare Peat Coverage Ditch Density -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Z-Score Vulnerability Marsh Area Potential Marsh Loss to SLR Potential Gain from Migration Trend in Waterward Marsh Loss Edge Density Percent High Marsh Total Score -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 Z-Score Marsh Condition vs. Vulnerability Higher condition/Lower Vulnerability 0.8 Higher condition/Higher Vulnerability W. T. Davis Outer Alley0.6 Creek Inner Four Sparrow Pelham Bay Cove Richmond Creek 0.4 Saw Mill Creek InnerSaw Mill Creek Outer Hutchinson Inner 0.2 Turtle Cove Neck Creek Inner Udall's Cove Marsh Neck Creek Outer 0 Alley Creek Outer -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Hutchinson Outer W. T. Davis Inner Lemon Creek Inner Idlewild Marsh Inner -0.2 Fresh Kills Marsh Fresh Creek Marsh Arlington Marsh -0.4 Spring Creek Bronx/QueensLong Island Sound Westchester Creek Jamaica Bay -0.6 Pugsley Creek Marsh Idlewild Marsh Outer Staten Island -0.8 Lemon Creek Outer Lower condition/Lower Vulnerability Lower condition/Higher Vulnerability -1 Marsh Area and Shape Explain Trends in Condition and Vulnerability Variables R2 = R2 = -0.89 0.70 Identify and prioritize strategies for restoration Short/Mid-Term: Increase viability of existing marsh sites Remove fill and re-establish hydrology Remove debris and revegetate • Increase elevation of drowning marsh surface • Restore shore edge of marsh where eroded Long Term: Assure sustainability of marsh ecosystems • Secure adjacent parcels where marsh can migrate • Remove hard surfaces that impede marsh migration Opportunities for Restoration / Conservation Actions Threats Targets Acquisition/Transfe r Obstacles to Marsh Migration Long Term Restore Flooded Viability & Developed lands Function Reduced Capacity of NYC Elevation for Vertical Growth Saltmarsh Enhancement es in Rebuild Marsh Erosion and Study Area Edge Decreased Size Acquisition/ Transfer Ownership across 25 NYC Marsh complexes 63 ac 36 ac 838 ac Current Marsh Future Marsh with SLR Future new marsh acres in Study Area 60 Private 50 City/State/Federal 40 NYC Parks Acres 30 20 10 0 Acquisition of advancement zones Restore Flooded Developed lands Action prioritized by area of opportunity Elevation Enhancement Action prioritized by % low marsh and future marsh loss in SLAMM Rebuild Marsh Edge Action prioritized by acres, width and % of recent marsh lost and future marsh loss in SLAMM Are these a better long- term investment? Is there anything we can do to save marshes that are highly vulnerable to begin with? Watershed / Water-body Considerations 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 JB LIS SI 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1 BQ JB SI Focus on watershed – specific needs • SI = Acquire and transfer parcels • JB = Restore elevation • LIS = Address Edge Extension uncertainty Next Steps • Preserve existing marsh ecosystems and marsh migration zones for future – explore acquisition and easement strategies • Prioritize high condition / low vulnerability marshes through best management practices and these 4 conservation strategies as needed o Address uncertainty - study shoreline retreat, sediment supply, and wave energy o Consider size and shape - conserve and restore to reduce fragmentation for long term health and viability • Consider socio-economic or ecosystem services when pursuing opportunities for low condition / high vulnerability marshes • Consider a watershed approach to conserving wetlands in addition to site by site restoration projects. Appropriate strategy depends on goals, landscape context, time horizon, and socioeconomic factors NYC Parks - Natural Resources Group Christopher Haight Marit Larson Rebecca Swadek Ellen K. Hartig Natural Areas Conservancy Helen M. Forgione The Nature Conservancy Funding from U.S. EPA Region 2, Nicole Maher Wetlands Protection Program Stephen Lloyd Development Grant Lauren Alleman Kathleen Drake .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum No
    305 West Grand Avenue, Suite 300 Montvale, New Jersey 07645 Phone 201.930.9890 Fax 201.930.9805 www.anchorqea.com MEMORANDUM To: Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber Date: October 1, 2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 2 From: David Haury and Matt Cavas Anchor QEA, LLC Project: 120782-01.01 Re: Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum No. 2 This memorandum presents the final decision regarding the candidate reference area sampling originally proposed in Section 3 of the Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum (WPA; Anchor QEA 2012a) and the subsequent Phase 1Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum (Reference Area Memorandum; Anchor QEA 2012b). CANDIDATE REFERENCE AREAS SELECTED FOR RECONNAISSANCE SAMPLING The areas to be sampled, shown on Figure 1, are generally located throughout Jamaica Bay and along portions of Lower and Upper East River. The 14 candidate reference areas shown were selected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on September 27, 2012 (Kwan 2012) after review of proposed candidate reference areas. These 14 areas were selected to provide multiple candidate areas within four general categories—industrial with combined sewer overflows (CSOs), industrial with no or minimal CSO input, non-industrial with CSOs, and non-industrial with no or minimal CSO input. Table 1 lists the 14 candidate reference areas and the general category they were placed in. The target locations within each candidate reference area are shown on Figures 2 through 15 and are listed in Table 2 of this memorandum. The sampling activities to be completed, which are summarized in this memorandum, will be performed in a manner consistent with the methods outlined in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan (RI/FS Work Plan; AECOM 2011) and described in greater detail in the Field Sampling and Analysis Plan (FSAP; Anchor QEA 2011a).
    [Show full text]
  • Westchester Creek Long Term Control Plan II
    New York City Department of Combined Sewer Overfl ow Environmental Protection Long Term Control Plan for Capital Project No. WP-169 Westchester Creek Long Term Control Plan II June 2014 CSO Long Term Control Plan II Long Term Control Plan Westchester Creek TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Goal Statement ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Regulatory Requirements (Federal, State, Local) ........................................................... 1-2 1.3 LTCP Planning Approach ................................................................................................ 1-4 2.0 WATERSHED/WATERBODY CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................2-1 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Waterbody Characteristics ............................................................................................. 2-22 3.0 CSO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ...................................................................3-1 3.1 Collection System Maintenance and Inspection Program ............................................... 3-2 3.2 Maximizing Use of Collection System for Storage ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Westchester Creek Combined Sewer Overflow Long Term Control Plan
    Westchester Creek Combined Sewer Overflow Long Term Control Plan Public Kickoff Meeting JHS 125 Henry Hudson School February 26, 2014 Welcome & Introductions Shane Ojar DEP 2 Agenda Topic 1 Welcome and Introductions 2 Long Term Control Plan (LTCP) Process 3 Waterbody/Watershed Characteristics 4 CSO Improvement Projects 5 LTCP Development 6 Public Participation Plan & Schedule 7 Next Steps 8 Discussion and Q&A Session 3 Objectives 1. Provide background and overview of Long Term Control Plan process for Westchester Creek 2. Present Westchester Creek watershed characteristics and status of waterbody improvement projects 3. Obtain public input on waterbody uses in and future vision for Westchester Creek 4. Describe additional opportunities for public input and outreach 4 What is a Combined Sewer Overflow? Approximately 60% of NYC’s sewer system is combined, which means it is used to convey both sanitary and storm flows. Heavy rain and snow storms can lead to higher than normal flows in combined sewers . When flows exceed twice the design capacity of treatment plants, a mix of excess stormwater and untreated wastewater may discharge directly into the city’s waterways . This is called a combined sewer overflow (CSO). CSOs are a concern because of their potential effect on water quality and recreational uses in local waterways. 5 Stakeholder Input DEP wants to hear from you! . What is your vision for the future for Westchester Creek? . How do you and other community members/ stakeholders use Westchester Creek (e.g., recreation)? . Combined Sewer Overflow or Water Quality improvement measures or alternatives you would like DEP to consider and evaluate .
    [Show full text]
  • LISS 3.3.Qxd
    RestoringRestoring LongLong CONNECTICUT Connecticut Quinnipiac River River IslandIsland Thames Sound’s River Sound’s Housatonic River Stonington HabitatsHabitats Old Saybrook COMPLETED RESTORATION SITES IN PROGRESS RESTORATION SITES POTENTIAL RESTORATION SITES PROJECT BOUNDARY RIVER LONG ISLAND SOUND Greenwich 2002 RESTORATION SITES Southold BLUE INDICATES COMPLETED SITE – CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT IS FINISHED, BUT MONITORING MAY BE ON-GOING GREEN INDICATES IN PROGRESS SITE– SOME PHASE OF THE PROJECT IS UNDERWAY, E.G. APPLYING FOR FUNDING, DESIGN, OR CONSTRUCTION BLACK INDICATES POTENTIAL SITE – A RESTORATION PROJECT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED, NO ACTION TAKEN YET MOUNT VERNON RYE BOLDFACE IN ALL COLORS INDICATES HIGH-RANKED SITES Rye Glover Field (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook/Cowperwood site (FW) Brookhaven NEW ROCHELLE Blind Brook (FW) Echo Bay (TW/SR/IF/RI) Edith G. Read Wildlife Sanctuary (TW/F/EE/FW) CONNECTICUT Former Dickerman’s Pond (FW) Marshlands Conservancy (TW/F/IF) Farm River (TW) EW ORK Nature Study Woods (F/FW) Farm River tributary/Edgemere Rd. (TW) N Y Pryer Manor Marsh (TW) SMITHTOWN BRANFORD Morris Creek/Sibley Lane (TW) Callahan’s Beach (CB) Branford River STP (TW) New Haven Airport (TW) Bronx BRONX NORTH HEMPSTEAD Fresh Pond (FW/F/BD) Branford R./Christopher Rd. (TW) Nissequogue Bronx Oyster Reefs (SR) Baxter Estates Pond (FW) Harrison Pond Town Park (FW/RMC/TW/F) Branford R./St. Agnes Cemetery (TW) EAST LYME NEW YORK Bronx River mouth (TW/F/RMC) Hempstead Harbor (EE/IF/TW) Landing Avenue Town Park (TW) Branford R./Hickory Rd. (TW) Brides Brook Culvert (RMC/TW) River Bronx River Trailway (TW/FW/F/RMC) Lake Success (FW) Long Beach (BD) Branford R.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Natural Areas Initiative?
    NaturalNatural AAreasreas InitiativeInitiative What are Natural Areas? With over 8 million people and 1.8 million cars in monarch butterflies. They reside in New York City’s residence, New York City is the ultimate urban environ- 12,000 acres of natural areas that include estuaries, ment. But the city is alive with life of all kinds, including forests, ponds, and other habitats. hundreds of species of flora and fauna, and not just in Despite human-made alterations, natural areas are spaces window boxes and pet stores. The city’s five boroughs pro- that retain some degree of wild nature, native ecosystems vide habitat to over 350 species of birds and 170 species and ecosystem processes.1 While providing habitat for native of fish, not to mention countless other plants and animals, plants and animals, natural areas afford a glimpse into the including seabeach amaranth, persimmons, horseshoe city’s past, some providing us with a window to what the crabs, red-tailed hawks, painted turtles, and land looked like before the built environment existed. What is the Natural Areas Initiative? The Natural Areas Initiative (NAI) works towards the (NY4P), the NAI promotes cooperation among non- protection and effective management of New York City’s profit groups, communities, and government agencies natural areas. A joint program of New York City to protect natural areas and raise public awareness about Audubon (NYC Audubon) and New Yorkers for Parks the values of these open spaces. Why are Natural Areas important? In the five boroughs, natural areas serve as important Additionally, according to the City Department of ecosystems, supporting a rich variety of plants and Health, NYC children are almost three times as likely to wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities
    SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities Status DEC Region NPDES ID Terminated 8 NYR00B679 Terminated 4 NYR00E979 Terminated 4 NYR00E094 Terminated 3 NYR00F907 Terminated 4 NYR00F128 Terminated 3 NYR00F294 Active 4 NYR00F440 Terminated 5 NYR00E193 Active 8 NYR00F759 No Exposure 1 NYR00G254 No Exposure 2 NYR00F729 Active 4 NYR00B055 Active 4 NYR00B054 No Exposure 8 NYR00G118 Active 3 NYR00B923 No Exposure 3 NYR00E656 Terminated 2 NYR00D894 No Exposure 1 NYR00F797 Active 3 NYR00B036 Page 1 of 1078 09/28/2021 SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities Name of Facility Location of Facility J A YANSICK LUMBER CO STATE RTE 70 LOCHVUE SPRING AVE EXT MAIN BROTHERS OIL CO INC - ROXBURY TERMINAL 25 LOCUST ST MONDELEZ GLOBAL LLC - NEWBURGH 800 CORPORATE BLVD TRAVIS 8412 STATE HWY 7 WASSAIC PIT BOX 221A P&M BRICK LLC MARINE TERMINAL 2170 RIVER RD CLINTON QUARRY LOST NATION RD ELMIRA ROAD MATERIALSLLC 1 COUNTY ROUTE 77A AEROFLEX PLAINVIEW 35 S. SERVICE RD. PRATT INSTITUTE MANHATTAN CAMPUS OPERATIONS 142-144 W 14TH ST WEST SAND LAKE PIT 3600 STATE RTE 43 HEMSTREET PARK BANK 3040 RIVER ROAD LOVE BEETS 1150 LEE RDSECT A FIRST STUDENT INC #12370 32 FITCHETT WAY UNITED STATES MINT NYS RTE 218 SWING STAGING INCORPORATED 55-51 43RD ST L-3 NARDA-ATM 49 RIDER AVE JOSEPH Y. RESNICK AIRPORT 199 AIRPORT ROAD Page 2 of 1078 09/28/2021 SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities City of Facility Zip of Facility County Name Sector Code HUNT 14846 Livingston POESTENKILL 12140 Rensselaer ROXBURY 12474 Delaware NEWBURGH 12550 Orange MARYLAND
    [Show full text]
  • VALENTINE's MANUAL of OLD NEW YORK
    Gc 974.702 PUBLIC LIBRARY N421V PORT WAYNE 8c ALLEN CO., IND. 1921 301064 SenhaloC^Y collection 02210 3862 .sormy.. 3 1833 aii»ntittt^^Mnttual nf Copyrig-ht, 1920 Press of The Chauncey Holt Company New York City 101064 Ea tl)[f Spatnration nf ; !%[ aittg l^all fark nnh tire lErrrtian nf tijp CONTENTS Page FIFTH AVENUE AND CENTRAL PARK, 1858 9 A retrospective comment on a rare view of the locality. SPLENDORS OF THE BATTERY IN 1835 20 A contemporary description from the N. Y. Mirror. "FRIENDSHIP GROVE" AND ITS MEMORIES 21 Recollections of Commodore E. C. Benedict. IMMORTALITY, "THE BUTTERFLY POEM," by Joseph Jefferson.... 25 RECORD OF SKATING DAYS, 1872-1887 46 DIARY OF A LITTLE GIRL IN OLD NEW YORK (Continued).... 47 Catherine Elizabeth Havens. CURIOUS OLD LETTER TO MR. ZENGER 70 EDGAR ALLAN POE IN NEW YORK CITY 71 From hitherto unprintcd papers in the possession of the Shakes- peare Society, by Dr. Appleton Morgan, President. NEW LIBERTY POLE AND REMOVAL OF THE POST OFFICE BUILDING 86 Action taken by the New York Historical Society and the Sons of the Revolution. LIBERTY POLES ERECTED AND CUT DOWN 90 AMERICA'S CUP 90 Commodore J. C. Stevens' account of ihe yacht race at Cowes, 1851. DEED OF TRUST OF THE AMERICA'S CUP TO THE NEW YORK YACHT CLUB 94 POPULATION FIGURES OF NEW YORK CITY, 1615-1920 96 [xi] Page EARLY DAYS OF DEPARTMENT STORES 97 Incidents and characteristics of their beginnings and growth in New York and of the men who made them. John Crawford Brown.
    [Show full text]
  • BCEQ Public Workshop Outreach Flyer EAST BRONX
    BRONX COUNCIL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (BCEQ) - www.bceq.org Roused for Rivers? Swayed by bays? Raise your voice! From Poughkeepsie to Perth Amboy, from the Bronx to Bay Shore, the NY-NJ Harbor and Estuary Program wants your vision to shape its upcoming Action Agenda. TUESDAY, JULY 12 FROM 6:30 TO 8:30 PM join BCEQ and HEP for a public workshop about the needs of WESTCHESTER CREEK AND THE EAST RIVER WATERSHEDS and the greater NY-NJ Harbor & Estuary at Owen Dolen Recreation Center 1398 Lane Ave, Bronx, NY 10461 We’ll be talking about… WaterWater Quality Quality HabitatHabitat Restoration Restoration PublicPublic Access Access Sediment Sediment and and Ports Ports PublicPublic Education Education The New York-New Jersey Harbor and Estuary Program (HEP) is a partnership of government agencies, civic organizations, and scientists that working towards a common to-do list for improving the waters, waterfronts, and watersheds of the NY-NJ Harbor and Estuary. HEP’s 2017 Action Agenda – a critical mandate of the Clean Water Act – will guide how HEP uses its funding, programmatic, and research capacities to carry out those shared goals. The Bronx Council for Environmental Quality (BCEQ) has sought to establish — as an Inherent Human Right — a sound, forward-looking environmental policy regarding an aesthetic, unpolluted, environment protecting a natural and historic heritage. Since 2001, they have worked on water issues, and recently formed the East Bronx Coastal Working Group for Westchester Creek, the Hutchinson River and the Long Island Sound. Other groups will present information including: the Long Island Sound Study (LISS), and invited speakers from the Natural Areas Conservancy, and the NYC Department of Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Groups Sue Over Unsafe Waters in New York City
    For Immediate Release Contacts: Cliff Weathers, Riverkeeper, 845-445-8257, [email protected] Laura McMillan, Save the Sound, 540-292-8429, [email protected] Kimiko Martinez, Natural Resources Defense Council, 310-434-2344, [email protected] Maia Raposo, Waterkeeper Alliance, 212-747-0622 x116, [email protected] Environmental Groups Sue over Unsafe Waters in New York City Lax Oversight Allows City and State to Evade Health Protections, Continue Sewer Overflows of 20 Billion Gallons/Year NEW YORK (June 29, 2017) — A coalition of nine New York City, regional, and national environmental organizations, represented by the Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic, filed suit in federal court today against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The complaint alleges that EPA is failing to protect the health of people who swim, boat, and fish in New York City waters by not forcing New York State to update its decades-old water quality standards. EPA and New York State are responsible for ensuring that New York City fixes the untreated sewage overflows that contaminate the City’s waters scores of times each year. But the State still relies on dangerously outdated water quality standards that do not protect those who come into contact with the water from bacteria, viruses, and other pathogens that cause intestinal illnesses, rashes and infections. The pollution also has ecological impacts, as excess nitrogen in sewage fuels algae blooms and low-oxygen dead zones in Long Island Sound. Since 1986, EPA has known that New York State’s standards must be updated to match federal health standards, and has formally notified the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Distribution of Legionella Pneumophila in Urban and Suburban Watersheds
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Student Theses Queens College Spring 5-28-2021 Investigating Distribution of Legionella Pneumophila in Urban and Suburban Watersheds Azlan Maqbool CUNY Queens College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/qc_etds/4 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INVESTIGATING DISTRIBUTION OF LEGIONELLA PNEUMOPHILA IN URBAN AND SUBURBAN WATERSHEDS Azlan Maqbool Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geological and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate Division of Queens College of the City University of New York May 2021 Advised by: Professor Gregory O'Mullan School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College Committee members: Professor Timothy Eaton School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College Professor M. Elias Dueker Environmental and Urban Studies Program, Bard College 1 ABSTRACT The presence of Legionella pneumophila was assessed using a cultivation-based approach in New York City waterways, a freshwater portion of the lower Hudson River Estuary near Kingston NY, and in urban and suburban street water. Legionella pneumophila was detected in 51% of brackish New York City Estuary samples, most with concentrations near minimum detection (1 organism/ mL). In contrast, it was detected in 22% of suburban freshwater Hudson River Estuary samples. Levels of the bacterium were found to be higher during wet weather compared to dry weather in the highly dense urban setting, but not in the less dense suburban/rural settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 143/Tuesday, July 25, 2000/Rules
    45716 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 25, 2000 / Rules and Regulations PART 1327ÐPROCEDURES FOR a letter to NHTSA certifying that the ADDRESSES: Comments and material PARTICIPATING IN AND RECEIVING State wishes to be reinstated as a received from the public, as well as INFORMATION FROM THE NATIONAL participating State and that it intends to documents indicated in this preamble as DRIVER REGISTER PROBLEM DRIVER be bound by the requirements of section being available in the docket, are part of POINTER SYSTEM 205 of the NDR Act of 1982 and § 1327.5 docket (CGD01±99±029) and are of this part. It shall also describe the available for inspection or copying at 1. The authority citation for part 1327 changes necessary to meet the statutory the First Coast Guard District, Bridge continues to read as follows: and regulatory requirements of PDPS. Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Authority: Pub.L. 97±364, 96 Stat. 1740, as (2) Within 20 days after receipt of the Boston, Massachusetts 02110, 7 a.m. to amended (49 U.S.C. 30301, et seq.); State's notification, NHTSA will 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. acknowledge receipt of the State's Federal holidays. 2. Section 1327.4 is revised to read as certification to be reinstated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. follows: (3) The chief driver licensing official John W. McDonald, Project Officer, First of a State that has notified NHTSA of its Coast Guard District, (617) 223±8364. § 1327.4 Certification, termination and intention to be reinstated as a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: reinstatement procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Wetlands Transfer Task Force Report
    Recommendations for the Transfer of City-Owned Properties Containing Wetlands Prepared by the New York City Wetlands Transfer Task Force September 2007 Recommendations for the Transfer of City-Owned Properties Containing Wetlands Prepared by the Wetlands Transfer Task Force September 2007 Cover Photos: Wetland properties acquired by New York City Department of Parks & Recreation (DPR) and restored by the Natural Resources Group, DPR. Foreground: Before, during and after tidal wetland restoration at an abandoned Concrete Plant along the Bronx River (restoration funded in part by the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration). Photographs by David Kaplan. Background: Spartina alterniflora and tidal creek following removal of a dike as part of salt marsh restoration at Udall’s Cove, Queens (restoration funded in part by New York State Department of State). Photograph by Michael Feller. September 2007 Recommendations for the Transfer of City-Owned Properties Containing Wetlands PREFACE The members of the Wetlands Transfer Task Force commend Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, the New York City Council, the Council’s Environmental Protection Committee and Committee Chair, Councilman James F. Gennaro for recognizing the importance of protecting the City’s remaining wetlands. Wetlands have a tremendous capacity to prevent flooding, reduce storm surges and improve downstream water quality. They protect and nurture our wildlife heritage – including globally significant birds and fisheries. Wetlands are also a vital and often beautiful element of the City’s rivers and estuaries, places for young and old to recreate, experience nature, and relax. Through Local Law 83, the multi-agency Wetlands Transfer Task Force (Task Force) was set up to inventory available City-owned properties containing wetlands and to make recommendations regarding their potential transfer to NYC Department of Parks & Recreation (DPR) or other agencies for protection from urban development.
    [Show full text]