DOCSLIB.ORG

WAIT! Program Recommendations Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WAIT! Program Recommendations Report WAIT! Program Recommendations Report SPRING 2016 - PRATT INSTITUTE • Programs for Sustainable Planning and Development Advisor: Jaime Stein Students: Lekhana Chidanand, Miguel Diaz, Maria Gonzalez • Graduate Communication Design Program Advisor: David Frisco Students: Melissa Berman, Corwin Green • Introduction Report • Implementation Plan • Land Use, Demographic & Overview Building Type Analyses • Survey Development • Literature Review • Engagement by Watershed Introduction • 2 Wait! Is a community engagement campaign to reduce problems with combined sewer overflow. This program uses printed media and text messages to encourage residents to limit their use of unnecessary water during rainy events. These activ- ities include washing dishes, using laundry machines, having multiple baths and Origin of the flushing the toilet. A pilot program is set to start this June on a small targeted area in Brooklyn. With Success, the pilot will grow to cover all communities in Brooklyn. Wait! Program After initial planning sessions with city wide water quality advocates including the S.W.I.M. Coalition and Newtown Creek Alliance, NYC DEP hired Futerra a behavioral design agency and M&R, a strategy and community engagement firm. Together they generated printed media, helped create the pilot scope and conducted preliminary community outreach. Introduction • 3 Pratt Institute joined the Wait! effort the Spring of 2016 to assist NYC DEP in assessing the pilot’s success and scaling it up citywide. Pratt’s research team includes graduate Green Infrastructure Fellows Maria Gonzalez, Lekhana Chidananda and Miguel Diaz led by Jaime Stein, Professor and Director of the Sustainable Environmental Systems program and graduate Communications Pratt Institute’s Team Design students Corwin Green and Melissa Berman led by Professor David Frisco. Collectively, the research team, over the course of the Spring semester, gener- ated a strategy and a list of recommendations to consider for measuring Wait!’s success expanding citywide. Introduction • 4 We consider Wait! to be a waterbody stewardship campaign which offers New Yorkers a way to take action in improving their local water quality. We set out the following objectives for Wait!: Approach • Connect Communities to Their Waterbodies • Harness Community Action and Objectives • Offer Qualitative Measures of Success for Wait! To accomplish these objectives and scale the Wait! pilot citywide, we propose an expansion strategy in which Wait! grows watershed by watershed, following the City’s ongoing Long Term Control Plan Process. The team also recognizes the importance of stakeholders in this effort. Advocates, community and civic organizations citywide are actively engaged in the mitigation of overflows and the education of community members as to how they can make a change to improve the current condition of our water bodies. This report offers an expansion framework with a strategic methodology for a watershed demographic study as well as a community survey, a stakeholder analysis and recommendations for qualitative tools for measuring Wait!’s success. In total, providing a methodology for replication of Wait! in each watershed. Our vision for Wait! is to achieve a social cohesion between the multiple communities that belong to the same watershed, so that they might understand their impact and how they can take action to change their current habits for a more sustainable environment in their homes and neighborhood. Introduction • 5 The goal of each Long Term Control Plan as determined by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is to “identify, with public input, appropriate Wait! CSO controls necessary to achieve waterbody-specific water quality standards (WQS) consistent with the Federal CSO Control Policy and related guidance”. As mentioned in the previous chapter, we propose a watershed-based methodol- Implementation ogy for city-wide implementation in order to integrate the implementation pro- City-wide cess within the existing LTCP schedule and ongoing City and Institutional efforts. The Long Term Control Plan Process as a Starting Point and Engagement Strategy Implementation Plan • 6 1. Longterm Control Plan The NYC Department of Environmental Protection has included 11 of these water- sheds within Combined Sewer Overflow Long Term Control Plans in an effort to Implementation reduce pollution from sewer overflow and improve water quality city-wide. Our recommendation is to work with the established timeframe and watershed order. Methodology 2. Waterbody by Waterbody The plan is to scale up a methodology that goes waterbody to waterbody. Our recommendation is to work with the established timeframe and watershed order to align City and State efforts with the plans and public involvement meetings already in motion. 3. Watershed Built Environment & Demographics This encapsulates the analysis of existing land use and buidling type, median household income, population density and affordable housing units, and demographic conditions, including race, ethnicity, and language spoken. Implementation Plan • 7 New York City is connected through 13 Watersheds. The NYC Department of Environmental Protection has included 11 of these watersheds within Combined Sewer Overflow Long Term Control Plans in an effort to reduce pollution from Implementation sewer overflow and improve water quality city-wide.1 The Flushing Bay and Flushing Creek watersheds in Queens are the pilot areas by watershed under study for the purpose of this report, as their Public Engagement processes are next in the LTCP schedule. Our recommendation is to work with the established timeframe and watershed order, as established in Fig. 1, to align City and State efforts with the plans and public involvement meetings already in motion. Implementation Plan • 8 1 S.W.I.M. Coalition, 2015. DEP'S PUBLIC MEETING TIMELINE In NYC, water quality is managed by the NYC Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), which is charged with the development of the LTCPs. DEP is required to actively seek input from the public as these plans are developed, so DEP holds three formal public meetings to do this. It's up to citizens to make sure these opportunities for input are meaningful. The plans are then submitted to the State Department of Envrionmental Conservation (DEC) for approval. To sign up to receive notice of public meetings, email DEP at [email protected] and ask to be on their email list. 1 PUBLIC 2 PUBLIC 3 PUBLIC MEETING #1 MEETING #2 MEETING #3 DEP introduces LTCP at DEP presents DEP presents kick-off meeting. alternatives and its proposed plan. recommended approach. DEP reviews waterbody DEP evaluates alternatives DEP considers feedback and DEC approves characteristics and analyzes water and develops plan. submits proposed plan to DEC final plan. quality data. for review. WAYS TO SPEAK UP INDIVIDUAL LTCP SCHEDULES AT A DEP MEETING Waterbody Status* Public involvement 5 Alley Creek 3 Nov. 17, 2015 Tell the NYC DEP how you currently Fig. 1. Long Term Control Plan Schedule, and for how 1 use theCombined city’s Sewer waterways Overflow by watershed you would use the water if it were (S.W.I.M. Coalition 2015) Westchester Creek The State DEC expected to invite cleaner. It is important that DEP not comments on whether to approve just prioritize high traffic beaches for plan. water quality improvements. Hutchinson River Send public comments to the State Ask about the NYC DEP’s water Bronx River 2 quality goals for the plan. Will the DEC. water be fishable and swimmable. If Send public comments to the State you paddler, row, or use the water in Gowanus Canal DEC. any other way, advocate for the water to be clean enough to swim in safely. The State DEC expected to invite Flushing Creek comments on whether to approve Ask the NYC DEP how they plan to The City DEP will submit final plan to 3 control CSO in your waterbody. Will Flushing Bay they reduce CSO? Can expanding the State DEC. June 2017 green infrastructure help reduce CSO? Or, will DEP add chlorine to 1 Nov. 4, 2015. disinfect CSO, and what health and Coney Island Creek Send public comments to the City environmental risks does this pose? DEP through Dec. 4, 2015. Ask about the relationship of 4 each waterbody to its neighboring Jamaica Bay & waterbodies. For example, is a Tributaries proposal to reduce CSOs in one planning has not begun, stay tuned for more waterbody increasing discharges in Newtown Creek information on status of plan and opportunities for an adjacent waterbody? public involvement Ask about the LTCP timeline. When is Citywide 5 the NYC DEP starting improvements (East River & Open and why? Waters)* *This status is SWIM's best estimate of where DEP is in their development process. Stormwater Infrastructure Matters (SWIM) Coalition is a coalition dedicated to ensuring swimmable and fishable waters around New York City through natural, sustainable stormwater management practices. For more information about the plans and to get involved with our outreach program, stay in touch: [email protected] | www.swimmablenyc.org | @SWIMcoalition Flushing Bay and Flushing Creek are located in North Central Queens. The watersheds have a combined drainage area of 18,854 acres, of which 61.2% is served by combined sewers.2 This accounts for almost 10% of New Why Flushing Bay York City’s total land area.3 According to the Long Term Control Plan timeline, the Flushing Creek and and Flushing Creek? Flushing Bay watersheds are the following to undergo review by the NYCDEP and in public engagement meetings. As our recommendation is to follow the LTCP public engagement process, the team developed a series of maps to understand the various demographic data within the watershed such as the median household income, language distribution, population density etc. The group also analysed the watershed area in terms of the sewersheds, and the stakeholders that operate within the watershed area. The various stakeholders include educational groups, govern- mental, non-profit groups, business etc. The analysis of the data helped develop ethnographic research and surveys to discover the efficacy of the WAIT! program in the Flushing Bay & Flushing Creek watershed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz
    THE OFFICE OF THE QUEENS BOROUGH PRESIDENT Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz Queens Borough President The Borough of Queens is home to more than 2.3 million residents, representing more than 120 countries and speaking more than 135 languages1. The seamless knit that ties these distinct cultures and transforms them into shared communities is what defines the character of Queens. The Borough’s diverse population continues to steadily grow. Foreign-born residents now represent 48% of the Borough’s population2. Traditional immigrant gateways like Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, and Flushing are now communities with the highest foreign-born population in the entire city3. Immigrant and Intercultural Services The immigrant population remains largely underserved. This is primarily due to linguistic and cultural barriers. Residents with limited English proficiency now represent 28% of the Borough4, indicating a need for a wide range of social service support and language access to City services. All services should be available in multiple languages, and outreach should be improved so that culturally sensitive programming can be made available. The Borough President is actively working with the Queens General Assembly, a working group organized by the Office of the Queens Borough President, to address many of these issues. Cultural Queens is amidst a cultural transformation. The Borough is home to some of the most iconic buildings and structures in the world, including the globally recognized Unisphere and New York State Pavilion. Areas like Astoria and Long Island City are establishing themselves as major cultural hubs. In early 2014, the New York City Council designated the area surrounding Kaufman Astoria Studios as the city’s first arts district through a City Council Proclamation The areas unique mix of adaptively reused residential, commercial, and manufacturing buildings serve as a catalyst for growth in culture and the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1928-02-00 Index
    THE CITY RECORD. INDEX FOR FEBRUARY, 1928. t r ACCOUNTS, COMMISSIONER OF— ALDERMEN, BOARD OF— ALDERMEN, BOARD OF— Changes in the department, etc., 995, 1018, 1040, 1424. Finance, Committee on, report of the— Public Letting, Committee on, report of the— In favor of adopting resolution amending a resolution In favor of adopting resolution authorizing the Presi- ALDERMEN, BOARD OF— for special revenue bonds, $25,000, for making re- American Legion, T. J. Oakley Rhinelander 2d, Post dent of the Borough of Manhattan to contract for pairs to and waterproofing the Soldiers and Sailors No. 6, request for amendment to chapter 1, of article the making safe of roadways, sidewalks and sewers Monument in Riverside drive by extending the time 2, section 8, of the Code of Ordinances, relating to during the year 1928 when emergency arises, with- for use thereof to December 31, 1928, 984, 1217. out public letting; amount, $10,000, 1215, 1406, office hours, 1556. In favor of adopting a resolution amending resolution In favor of adopting resolution authorizing County An ordinance to amend section 2 of article 1 of chapter granting permission to the Church of Mount Carmel, Clerk, Bronx County, to purchase photostat equip- 11 of the Code of Ordinances, relating to the dis- Borough of Manhattan, to construct and maintain a ment, without public letting; amount, $5,470.50, 1215, charge of small-arms, 1574. vault without payment of the usual fee, 984, 1220. 1406. Assessors, Board of, summary of report for 1927 sub- In favor of adopting resolution amending a resolution In favor of adopting resolution authorizing Commis- mitted to his Honor the Mayor, 1215.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum No
    305 West Grand Avenue, Suite 300 Montvale, New Jersey 07645 Phone 201.930.9890 Fax 201.930.9805 www.anchorqea.com MEMORANDUM To: Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber Date: October 1, 2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 2 From: David Haury and Matt Cavas Anchor QEA, LLC Project: 120782-01.01 Re: Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum No. 2 This memorandum presents the final decision regarding the candidate reference area sampling originally proposed in Section 3 of the Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum (WPA; Anchor QEA 2012a) and the subsequent Phase 1Remedial Investigation Work Plan Addendum: Reference Area Memorandum (Reference Area Memorandum; Anchor QEA 2012b). CANDIDATE REFERENCE AREAS SELECTED FOR RECONNAISSANCE SAMPLING The areas to be sampled, shown on Figure 1, are generally located throughout Jamaica Bay and along portions of Lower and Upper East River. The 14 candidate reference areas shown were selected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on September 27, 2012 (Kwan 2012) after review of proposed candidate reference areas. These 14 areas were selected to provide multiple candidate areas within four general categories—industrial with combined sewer overflows (CSOs), industrial with no or minimal CSO input, non-industrial with CSOs, and non-industrial with no or minimal CSO input. Table 1 lists the 14 candidate reference areas and the general category they were placed in. The target locations within each candidate reference area are shown on Figures 2 through 15 and are listed in Table 2 of this memorandum. The sampling activities to be completed, which are summarized in this memorandum, will be performed in a manner consistent with the methods outlined in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan (RI/FS Work Plan; AECOM 2011) and described in greater detail in the Field Sampling and Analysis Plan (FSAP; Anchor QEA 2011a).
    [Show full text]
  • Westchester Creek Long Term Control Plan II
    New York City Department of Combined Sewer Overfl ow Environmental Protection Long Term Control Plan for Capital Project No. WP-169 Westchester Creek Long Term Control Plan II June 2014 CSO Long Term Control Plan II Long Term Control Plan Westchester Creek TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Goal Statement ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Regulatory Requirements (Federal, State, Local) ........................................................... 1-2 1.3 LTCP Planning Approach ................................................................................................ 1-4 2.0 WATERSHED/WATERBODY CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................2-1 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Waterbody Characteristics ............................................................................................. 2-22 3.0 CSO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ...................................................................3-1 3.1 Collection System Maintenance and Inspection Program ............................................... 3-2 3.2 Maximizing Use of Collection System for Storage ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Westchester Creek Combined Sewer Overflow Long Term Control Plan
    Westchester Creek Combined Sewer Overflow Long Term Control Plan Public Kickoff Meeting JHS 125 Henry Hudson School February 26, 2014 Welcome & Introductions Shane Ojar DEP 2 Agenda Topic 1 Welcome and Introductions 2 Long Term Control Plan (LTCP) Process 3 Waterbody/Watershed Characteristics 4 CSO Improvement Projects 5 LTCP Development 6 Public Participation Plan & Schedule 7 Next Steps 8 Discussion and Q&A Session 3 Objectives 1. Provide background and overview of Long Term Control Plan process for Westchester Creek 2. Present Westchester Creek watershed characteristics and status of waterbody improvement projects 3. Obtain public input on waterbody uses in and future vision for Westchester Creek 4. Describe additional opportunities for public input and outreach 4 What is a Combined Sewer Overflow? Approximately 60% of NYC’s sewer system is combined, which means it is used to convey both sanitary and storm flows. Heavy rain and snow storms can lead to higher than normal flows in combined sewers . When flows exceed twice the design capacity of treatment plants, a mix of excess stormwater and untreated wastewater may discharge directly into the city’s waterways . This is called a combined sewer overflow (CSO). CSOs are a concern because of their potential effect on water quality and recreational uses in local waterways. 5 Stakeholder Input DEP wants to hear from you! . What is your vision for the future for Westchester Creek? . How do you and other community members/ stakeholders use Westchester Creek (e.g., recreation)? . Combined Sewer Overflow or Water Quality improvement measures or alternatives you would like DEP to consider and evaluate .
    [Show full text]
  • LISS 3.3.Qxd
    RestoringRestoring LongLong CONNECTICUT Connecticut Quinnipiac River River IslandIsland Thames Sound’s River Sound’s Housatonic River Stonington HabitatsHabitats Old Saybrook COMPLETED RESTORATION SITES IN PROGRESS RESTORATION SITES POTENTIAL RESTORATION SITES PROJECT BOUNDARY RIVER LONG ISLAND SOUND Greenwich 2002 RESTORATION SITES Southold BLUE INDICATES COMPLETED SITE – CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT IS FINISHED, BUT MONITORING MAY BE ON-GOING GREEN INDICATES IN PROGRESS SITE– SOME PHASE OF THE PROJECT IS UNDERWAY, E.G. APPLYING FOR FUNDING, DESIGN, OR CONSTRUCTION BLACK INDICATES POTENTIAL SITE – A RESTORATION PROJECT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED, NO ACTION TAKEN YET MOUNT VERNON RYE BOLDFACE IN ALL COLORS INDICATES HIGH-RANKED SITES Rye Glover Field (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook/Cowperwood site (FW) Brookhaven NEW ROCHELLE Blind Brook (FW) Echo Bay (TW/SR/IF/RI) Edith G. Read Wildlife Sanctuary (TW/F/EE/FW) CONNECTICUT Former Dickerman’s Pond (FW) Marshlands Conservancy (TW/F/IF) Farm River (TW) EW ORK Nature Study Woods (F/FW) Farm River tributary/Edgemere Rd. (TW) N Y Pryer Manor Marsh (TW) SMITHTOWN BRANFORD Morris Creek/Sibley Lane (TW) Callahan’s Beach (CB) Branford River STP (TW) New Haven Airport (TW) Bronx BRONX NORTH HEMPSTEAD Fresh Pond (FW/F/BD) Branford R./Christopher Rd. (TW) Nissequogue Bronx Oyster Reefs (SR) Baxter Estates Pond (FW) Harrison Pond Town Park (FW/RMC/TW/F) Branford R./St. Agnes Cemetery (TW) EAST LYME NEW YORK Bronx River mouth (TW/F/RMC) Hempstead Harbor (EE/IF/TW) Landing Avenue Town Park (TW) Branford R./Hickory Rd. (TW) Brides Brook Culvert (RMC/TW) River Bronx River Trailway (TW/FW/F/RMC) Lake Success (FW) Long Beach (BD) Branford R.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Natural Areas Initiative?
    NaturalNatural AAreasreas InitiativeInitiative What are Natural Areas? With over 8 million people and 1.8 million cars in monarch butterflies. They reside in New York City’s residence, New York City is the ultimate urban environ- 12,000 acres of natural areas that include estuaries, ment. But the city is alive with life of all kinds, including forests, ponds, and other habitats. hundreds of species of flora and fauna, and not just in Despite human-made alterations, natural areas are spaces window boxes and pet stores. The city’s five boroughs pro- that retain some degree of wild nature, native ecosystems vide habitat to over 350 species of birds and 170 species and ecosystem processes.1 While providing habitat for native of fish, not to mention countless other plants and animals, plants and animals, natural areas afford a glimpse into the including seabeach amaranth, persimmons, horseshoe city’s past, some providing us with a window to what the crabs, red-tailed hawks, painted turtles, and land looked like before the built environment existed. What is the Natural Areas Initiative? The Natural Areas Initiative (NAI) works towards the (NY4P), the NAI promotes cooperation among non- protection and effective management of New York City’s profit groups, communities, and government agencies natural areas. A joint program of New York City to protect natural areas and raise public awareness about Audubon (NYC Audubon) and New Yorkers for Parks the values of these open spaces. Why are Natural Areas important? In the five boroughs, natural areas serve as important Additionally, according to the City Department of ecosystems, supporting a rich variety of plants and Health, NYC children are almost three times as likely to wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities
    SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities Status DEC Region NPDES ID Terminated 8 NYR00B679 Terminated 4 NYR00E979 Terminated 4 NYR00E094 Terminated 3 NYR00F907 Terminated 4 NYR00F128 Terminated 3 NYR00F294 Active 4 NYR00F440 Terminated 5 NYR00E193 Active 8 NYR00F759 No Exposure 1 NYR00G254 No Exposure 2 NYR00F729 Active 4 NYR00B055 Active 4 NYR00B054 No Exposure 8 NYR00G118 Active 3 NYR00B923 No Exposure 3 NYR00E656 Terminated 2 NYR00D894 No Exposure 1 NYR00F797 Active 3 NYR00B036 Page 1 of 1078 09/28/2021 SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities Name of Facility Location of Facility J A YANSICK LUMBER CO STATE RTE 70 LOCHVUE SPRING AVE EXT MAIN BROTHERS OIL CO INC - ROXBURY TERMINAL 25 LOCUST ST MONDELEZ GLOBAL LLC - NEWBURGH 800 CORPORATE BLVD TRAVIS 8412 STATE HWY 7 WASSAIC PIT BOX 221A P&M BRICK LLC MARINE TERMINAL 2170 RIVER RD CLINTON QUARRY LOST NATION RD ELMIRA ROAD MATERIALSLLC 1 COUNTY ROUTE 77A AEROFLEX PLAINVIEW 35 S. SERVICE RD. PRATT INSTITUTE MANHATTAN CAMPUS OPERATIONS 142-144 W 14TH ST WEST SAND LAKE PIT 3600 STATE RTE 43 HEMSTREET PARK BANK 3040 RIVER ROAD LOVE BEETS 1150 LEE RDSECT A FIRST STUDENT INC #12370 32 FITCHETT WAY UNITED STATES MINT NYS RTE 218 SWING STAGING INCORPORATED 55-51 43RD ST L-3 NARDA-ATM 49 RIDER AVE JOSEPH Y. RESNICK AIRPORT 199 AIRPORT ROAD Page 2 of 1078 09/28/2021 SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities City of Facility Zip of Facility County Name Sector Code HUNT 14846 Livingston POESTENKILL 12140 Rensselaer ROXBURY 12474 Delaware NEWBURGH 12550 Orange MARYLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Health Department to Conduct Mosquito Adulticiding in Parts of the Bronx and Queens to Reduce Risk of West Nile Virus
    NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Dave A. Chokshi, MD MSc Commissioner FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, August 12, 2021 HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT MOSQUITO ADULTICIDING IN PARTS OF THE BRONX AND QUEENS TO REDUCE RISK OF WEST NILE VIRUS Trucks will spray pesticide in parts of Queens and the Bronx in the evening of Tuesday, August 17 August 12, 2021 – To reduce mosquito activity and the risk of West Nile virus, the Health Department will conduct an adulticide treatment in Queens and the Bronx. Trucks will spray pesticides in sections of Queens and the Bronx on Tuesday, August 17 between the hours of 8:30 p.m. and 6 a.m. the following morning, weather permitting. In case of bad weather or equipment malfunctions, application will be delayed until Wednesday, August 18. The Health Department will use very low concentrations of Anvil®, Duet®, or DeltaGard®. The risks of pesticides applied by the Health Department for mosquito control are low to people and pets. Some people who are sensitive to spray ingredients may experience short-term eye or throat irritation, or a rash. People with respiratory conditions may also be affected. To stay safe during spraying: • Stay indoors, whenever possible. • Air conditioners can remain on. While unnecessary, you may wish to close air conditioner vents, or choose the recirculate function. After spraying: • Wash skin and clothing exposed to pesticides with soap and water. • Always wash fruits and vegetables with water. The most effective way to control mosquitoes is to eliminate any standing water. New Yorkers are also encouraged to mosquito-proof their homes and take precautions when spending time outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • March 18, 2019 Agenda
    Design Commission Meeting Agenda Monday, March 18, 2019 The Committee Meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:50 a.m. Public Meeting 11:40 a.m. Consent Items 26933: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, Queens District 7 Garage, 120-15 31st Avenue, Flushing, Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 19, CB 7) DDC/DSNY 26960: Construction of a parking lot adjacent to Building 280, Flushing Avenue, North Oxford Street, Ordinance Avenue, and Fifth Street, Brooklyn Navy Yard Industrial Park, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 33, CB 2) BNYDC 26961: Reconstruction of a parking lot adjacent to Building 5, Market Street, Eighth Avenue, Paulding Street, and Sixth Street, Brooklyn Navy Yard Industrial Park, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 33, CB 2) BNYDC 26962: Installation of a prototypical newsstand, 1396 Second Avenue, northeast corner of Second Avenue and East 72nd Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 5, CB 8) DCA/DOT 26963: Installation of a prototypical newsstand, 3100 47th Avenue, southeast corner of 47th Avenue and 31st Street, Long Island City, Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 26, CB 2) DCA/DOT 26964: Installation of a prototypical newsstand, 660 Columbus Avenue, northwest corner of Columbus Avenue and West 92nd Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 6, CB 7) DCA/DOT 26965: Installation of the Rebecca Salome Foster Memorial by Karl Bitter, 60 Centre Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary) (CC 1, CB 1) DCAS 26966: Installation of Urban Poet by Alexandre Arrechea, Atlantic Avenue median between Conduit Boulevard and Fountain Avenue, Brooklyn. (Conceptual) (CC 37, CB 5) DCLA%/DDC/DOT 26967: Installation of un(Common) Threads by Borinquen Gallo, 40th Police Precinct, East 149th Street and St.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Wastewater Treatment System
    New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System Cleaning the Water We Use • Protecting the Environment We Live In New York City Department of Environmental Protection Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor Emily Lloyd, Commissioner List of Acronyms NYCDEP . New York City Department of Environmental Protection NYSDEC . New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NYCDOS . New York City Department of Sanitation USEPA . United States Environmental Protection Agency NYPA . New York Power Authority NYCSWCD . New York City Soil and Water Conservation District ALS . American Littoral Society WPCP . Water Pollution Control Plant NYOFCo . New York Organic Fertilizer Company IPP . Industrial Pretreatment Program PERC . Perchloroethylene CSO . Combined Sewer Overflow EBPP . Enhanced Beach Protection Program MGD . Million Gallons per Day CWA . Clean Water Act PCB . Polychlorinated Biphenols PAHs . Poly-Aromatic Hydrocarbons BOD . Biochemical Oxygen Demand TSS . Total Suspended Solids DO . Dissolved Oxygen BNR . Biological Nutrient Removal New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System 1 Table of Contents How Water Gets to Us¬ . 4 History of New York City Water . 4 Wastewater Treatment – Past and Present . 5-6 Nitrogen Control Applied Research Program . 6 Wastewater Treatment Process . 7-9 Preliminary Treatment Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Disinfection Sludge Treatment Thickening Digestion Sludge Dewatering Beneficial Use of Biosolids . 9 How Biosolids Are Used . 10-11 Land Application Composting Alkaline Treatment Heat Drying How New York City Protects Its Water Environment . 11 Testing New York City Waterways Environmental Concerns . 11 Toxic Substances Pollution Control Programs . 12-16 Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) Persistent Pollutant Track-down Program Perchloroethylene Program (PERC) Corrosion Control Program 2 New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System Pollution Control Programs Continued .
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Nick.IECDOM\Desktop\Annual Report 2001\1H Pages1-7.Wpd
    II. WATER POLLUTION GENERAL During 2001, in the Interstate Environmental District, approximately $8.408 billion was allocated for 277 water pollution control projects which were either completed, in progress, or planned for the future. These monies were allocated in the following manner: over $125.1 million for 55 completed projects, more than $5.3628 billion for 134 projects in progress, and more than $2.92 billion for 88 future projects. These expenditures are being used for engineering studies, pilot projects and experiments; CSO abatement projects; land-based alternatives for sewage sludge disposal; construction of new facilities; and upgrading and/or expanding existing facilities in order to provide adequately treated wastewater for discharge into District waterways. These figures do not include the monies spent by and committed to pollution control by industries. The Commission has long advocated adequate infrastructure as a necessity for maintaining and improving receiving water quality, as well as for minimizing use impairments. These tremendous expenditures on the infrastructure have resulted in significant water quality improvements throughout the District these past years; however, much remains to be done. With secondary treatment virtually in place since 1994 throughout the Interstate Environmental District, control of the region’s combined sewer overflows is necessary in order to achieve further significant water quality improvements. Communities throughout the District have ongoing CSO control programs and projects that range from sewer separation to swirl concentrators to booming and skimming to in-line and off-line storage. The National Estuary Programs in the District have identified major problems affecting water quality which are exacerbated by anthropogenic impacts, namely, nutrient enrichment, sediment contamination, pathogens, habitat loss and floatables.
    [Show full text]