Peregrine Falcon Biology and Management in Colorado 1973 - 2001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peregrine Falcon Biology and Management in Colorado 1973 - 2001 PEREGRINE FALCON BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT IN COLORADO 1973 - 2001 STATE OF COLORADO - DIVISION OF WILDLIFE PEREGRINE FALCON BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT IN COLORADO 1973 - 2001 Gerald R. Craig and James H. Enderson Technical Publication No. 43 COLORADO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE July 2004 DOW-R-T-43-04 ISSN 0084-8883 STATE OF COLORADO Bill Owens, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Russell George, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION Philip James, Chairman, Fort Collins; Jeffrey Crawford, Vice Chairman, Denver; Brad Phelps, Secretary, Gunnison; Bernard Black, Denver; Tom Burke, Grand Junction; Rick Enstrom, Lakewood; Claire O’Neal, Holyoke; Robert Shoemaker, Canon City; Ken Torres, Weston; Don Ament (Ex Officio); Russell George (Ex-Officio). DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Bruce McCloskey, Director MANAGEMENT STAFF: Steve Cassin, Planning/Budgeting; Marilyn Salazar, Support Services; John Smeltzer, Public Services; Jeff Ver Steeg, Wildlife Programs REGIONAL MANAGERS: Ron Velarde, Northwest; Mark Konishi, Southeast; Scott Hoover Northeast; Tom Spezze, Southwest. Study funded by Colorado Division of Wildlife Edited by Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Project W-173-R Sandy Cochran 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................................9 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................11 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................13 Distribution ................................................................................................................................13 Inventories.................................................................................................................................13 RECOVERY PROGRAM .................................................................................................................14 Recovery Plan...........................................................................................................................14 Propagation...............................................................................................................................14 Falcon Management .................................................................................................................14 Recycling ...........................................................................................................................14 Fostering............................................................................................................................16 Hacking..............................................................................................................................17 Cross-fostering ..................................................................................................................19 Results of Fostering and Hacking.............................................................................................20 Size of the releases ...........................................................................................................20 Population increase ...........................................................................................................21 Discovery of eyries ............................................................................................................22 Increases in known pairs ...................................................................................................23 NATURAL HISTORY........................................................................................................................26 Breeding Chronology ................................................................................................................26 Nesting Habitat .........................................................................................................................26 Cliff prominence.................................................................................................................26 Settings of cliffs .................................................................................................................28 Cliff orientation...................................................................................................................30 Nest ledges........................................................................................................................32 Hunting Range..........................................................................................................................33 Prey...........................................................................................................................................34 REPRODUCTION............................................................................................................................36 Clutch size ................................................................................................................................36 Brood Size ................................................................................................................................37 Fledging Rate............................................................................................................................37 Nest Success............................................................................................................................38 Nestling Attrition........................................................................................................................38 Productivity ...............................................................................................................................39 Sex Ratio of Nestlings ..............................................................................................................40 SHELL THICKNESS, DDE, AND REPRODUCTION ......................................................................42 Eggshell Thickness ...................................................................................................................42 Whole shells ......................................................................................................................42 Shell fragments..................................................................................................................43 Shell thickness and hatching .............................................................................................43 3 DDE Relationships....................................................................................................................43 DDE in eggs, 1973-90 .......................................................................................................43 DDE and shell thickness....................................................................................................45 Regional comparison of DDE levels..................................................................................45 DDE Overview ..........................................................................................................................45 REPRODUCTIVITY AND MORTALITY ...........................................................................................47 Minimum Productivity to Sustain the Population.......................................................................47 Adult Tenure and Productivity on Territory ................................................................................47 Reproductive Performance by Females....................................................................................49 Reproductive Performance by Males........................................................................................50 The Effect of Adult Turnover on Productivity.............................................................................51 Biases of Reproductive Estimates ............................................................................................51 Success at historical eyries compared to recently found sites..........................................51 Potential for bias caused by using data from year of discovery ........................................52 MORTALITY ....................................................................................................................................53 Predation ...........................................................................................................................53 Collisions ...........................................................................................................................54 Starvation...........................................................................................................................55 Gunshot and poison ..........................................................................................................55 Rock climbing ....................................................................................................................55 Mortality Rates..........................................................................................................................55 Estimates from band recoveries ........................................................................................55 Estimates from adult turnover............................................................................................55 MOVEMENTS AND WINTERING AREAS ......................................................................................56
Recommended publications
  • Hungary & Transylvania
    Although we had many exciting birds, the ‘Bird of the trip’ was Wallcreeper in 2015. (János Oláh) HUNGARY & TRANSYLVANIA 14 – 23 MAY 2015 LEADER: JÁNOS OLÁH Central and Eastern Europe has a great variety of bird species including lots of special ones but at the same time also offers a fantastic variety of different habitats and scenery as well as the long and exciting history of the area. Birdquest has operated tours to Hungary since 1991, being one of the few pioneers to enter the eastern block. The tour itinerary has been changed a few times but nowadays the combination of Hungary and Transylvania seems to be a settled and well established one and offers an amazing list of European birds. This tour is a very good introduction to birders visiting Europe for the first time but also offers some difficult-to-see birds for those who birded the continent before. We had several tour highlights on this recent tour but certainly the displaying Great Bustards, a majestic pair of Eastern Imperial Eagle, the mighty Saker, the handsome Red-footed Falcon, a hunting Peregrine, the shy Capercaillie, the elusive Little Crake and Corncrake, the enigmatic Ural Owl, the declining White-backed Woodpecker, the skulking River and Barred Warblers, a rare Sombre Tit, which was a write-in, the fluty Red-breasted and Collared Flycatchers and the stunning Wallcreeper will be long remembered. We recorded a total of 214 species on this short tour, which is a respectable tally for Europe. Amongst these we had 18 species of raptors, 6 species of owls, 9 species of woodpeckers and 15 species of warblers seen! Our mammal highlight was undoubtedly the superb views of Carpathian Brown Bears of which we saw ten on a single afternoon! 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Hungary & Transylvania 2015 www.birdquest-tours.com We also had a nice overview of the different habitats of a Carpathian transect from the Great Hungarian Plain through the deciduous woodlands of the Carpathian foothills to the higher conifer-covered mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Care and Feeding of Trained Hawks and Falcons by Jim Roush
    Volume 27 | Issue 2 Article 8 1965 The aC re And Feeding Of Trained Hawks And Falcons Jim Roush Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowastate_veterinarian Part of the Veterinary Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Roush, Jim (1965) "The aC re And Feeding Of Trained Hawks And Falcons," Iowa State University Veterinarian: Vol. 27 : Iss. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowastate_veterinarian/vol27/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Iowa State University Veterinarian by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Care And Feeding Of Trained Hawks And Falcons by Jim Roush Falconry is the art of training hawks, is the first few months after hatching. falcons, and eagles to pursue and capture Baby hawks are extremely frail and tender wild game. It is perhaps the oldest field and they are very susceptible to trauma sport; in fact it was one of the ways of and the forces of nature. They are also procuring meat for the table before fire­ very susceptible to the nutritional dis­ arms were developed. During the first half orders such as rickets, perosis (slipped of this century this ancient sport has in­ Achille's tendon) etc. Louse powders com­ creased in popularity. This is probably due monly used on cattle and poultry can kill to the rising standard of living and a sub­ them.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Peregrine Falcon
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group PEREGRINE FALCON Falco peregrinus Family: FALCONIDAE Order: FALCONIFORMES Class: AVES B129 Written by: C. Polite, J. Pratt Reviewed by: L. Kiff Edited by: L. Kiff DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY Very uncommon breeding resident, and uncommon as a migrant. Active nesting sites are known along the coast north of Santa Barbara, in the Sierra Nevada, and in other mountains of northern California. In winter, found inland throughout the Central Valley, and occasionally on the Channel Islands. Migrants occur along the coast, and in the western Sierra Nevada in spring and fall. Breeds mostly in woodland, forest, and coastal habitats. Riparian areas and coastal and inland wetlands are important habitats yearlong, especially in nonbreeding seasons. Population has declined drastically in recent years (Thelander 1975,1976); 39 breeding pairs were known in California in 1981 (Monk 1981). Decline associated mostly with DDE contamination. Coastal population apparently reproducing poorly, perhaps because of heavier DDE load received from migrant prey. The State has established 2 ecological reserves to protect nesting sites. A captive rearing program has been established to augment the wild population, and numbers are increasing (Monk 1981). SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Swoops from flight onto flying prey, chases in flight, rarely hunts from a perch. Takes a variety of birds up to ducks in size; occasionally takes mammals, insects, and fish. In Utah, Porter and White (1973) reported that 19 nests averaged 5.3 km (3.3 mi) from the nearest foraging marsh, and 12.2 km (7.6 mi) from the nearest marsh over 130 ha (320 ac) in area.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here for New Falconry Films Western Sporting: New Falconry Films to Our List!
    CLICK HERE FOR NEW FALCONRY FILMS WESTERN SPORTING: NEW FALCONRY FILMS TO OUR LIST! FD1050 FD2045 FD2009 FD2005 HUNTING HAWKS IN ENGLAND Pastime Videos, 60 Minutes FD1048 The ancient art of falconry: hunting wild HOUSE OF GROUSE quarry with a trained hawk or falcon is SkyKing Productions, 39 Minutes FD1054 very exciting. We follow two North Steve's film-making abilities have EAGLE JOURNAL American Red-tailed Hawks and their improved greatly in the past few years! CorJo Productions, 30 minutes trainers, by day and by night, in their This is by far his greatest achievement In the USA, eagle falconry is gaining search for prey in the woods and open and it shows what is without a doubt popularity. More Golden Eagles are countryside of England. the most impressive longwing flights ever coming into the hands of falconers these There are a lot of authentic action captured on film. This new standard of days due to depredation permits. They sequences. The quarry these raptors falconry filming will set the standard on are fast, powerful raptors that can catch is primarily used as food to feed into the future. generally fly down anything in the field. not only them but numerous other All the elements of the high desert This video gives the viewer a rare hawks, owls and falcons, including many are included so we get a feel for the glimpse into the world of hunting with injured birds. They are all expertly cared wildlife, habitat, dramatic scenery as well Golden Eagles. Eagle falconer, Joe for at the Hagley Falconry & Bird as the falconry.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Specialties Western
    REGIONAL SPECIALTIES WESTERN OSPREY 21 - 26” length SOUTHERN . FERRUGINOUS . Eagle sized; clean, white body. HAWK Black wrist marks. 20 - 26” length . Glides with kink (M) in long, narrow wings. MISSISSIPPI . Largest buteo; eagle-like. KITE . Pale below with dark leggings. 13 - 15” length . Mostly white tail; 3 color morphs. Long, pointed wings; slim body. Light body; dark wings; narrow, black tail. Not to scale. Buoyant, acrobatic flight. NORTHERN HARRIER 16 - 20” length PRAIRIE FALCON 14 - 18” length . Long, narrow wings and tail; sharp dihedral. Size of Peregrine; much paler plumage. Brown above, streaked brown below – female. Narrow moustache; spotted breast; long tail. Gray above, pale below with black wing tips – male. Dark armpits and partial wing linings. WING PROFILE IMMATURE BALD EAGLE BALD EAGLE GOLDEN EAGLE . Immature birds vary GOLDEN EAGLE greatly in the amount 27 to 35” length of white spotting on body and wings. White showing on wing linings is surely a Bald Eagle. BALD EAGLE . Like large buteo, curvy wings. Head protrudes much less than tail. Slight dihedral to wing profile. NOTE: Some hawks soar and glide with their wings raised above the horizontal, called a dihedral. 27 to 35” length . Head and tail length similar. Long, flat wings. Straight leading edge to wings. 24 to 28” length This guide developed by Paul Carrier is the property of the Hawk Migration Association of North America (HMANA). HMANA is TURKey VUltUre a membership-based, non-profit organization committed to the . Dark wing linings with light flight feathers. conservation of raptors through the scientific study, enjoyment, and . Small head; long tail; sharp dihedral.
    [Show full text]
  • Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, Nighthawks and Whip-Poor-Wills Present Atlas Surveyors with Several Challenges
    Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, nighthawks and Whip-poor-wills present atlas surveyors with several challenges. Although many Minnesota species, including thrushes and marsh birds, may vocalize at sunset, pre-dawn, or even at night, most can be detected during early morning and daytime surveys. The surveyor’s chances of detecting most owls, however, as well as the common nighthawk and whip-poor-will, will be considerably enhanced by adding nocturnal surveys. Owls Minnesota’s 11 owl species are a mix of permanent, non-migratory residents (Eastern Screech Owl, Great Horned Owl and Barred Owl); summer residents (Long-eared Owl, Short-eared Owl, and Saw-whet Owl) and three species whose summer populations probably include both permanent residents and migratory invaders (Boreal Owl, Northern Hawk Owl and Great Gray Owl). The Burrowing Owl is an extremely rare summer resident in the western grassland region and the Barn Owl has been an erratic species whose status as a permanent resident or migratory invader is unknown. Three of these species tend to be more diurnal and the chances of seeing them during the day are relatively good. They include two open habitat species, the Short-eared Owl and Burrowing Owl, and one forest species, the Northern Hawk Owl. Like marsh hawks, Short- eared Owls can often be seen flying low over wet grasslands and marshes hunting for prey during the morning and early evening hours. The Burrowing Owl, a very rare nesting species in the state, is prominent as it stands as a sentinel atop its nesting burrow, just inches above the surrounding grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Nighthawk Chordeiles Minor
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2018 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2018. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 50 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2007. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 25 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Andrew Gregg Horn for writing the status report on Common Nighthawk, Chordeiles minor, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Richard Elliot, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Birds Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur L’engoulevent d’Amérique (Chordeiles minor) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Common Nighthawk, copyright by Ronnie d'Entremont. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2018. Catalogue No. CW69-14/515-2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-27850-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2018 Common name Common Nighthawk Scientific name Chordeiles minor Status Special Concern Reason for designation This aerial insectivore is a widespread breeding bird across southern and boreal Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of the First Black Swift Nest
    Discoveryof the FirstBlack Swift Nest John Farrand, Jr. describethe nest and eggsof the BlackSKANY Swift,COMPETENT and you'll BIRDER be toldto that this largest of North American swiftsplaces a small cup of moss and other plant material on a sheltered ledge near a waterfall, on a sea cliff. or in some other moist but inaccessi- ble spot, and that there is a single white egg. These basic facts are common knowledge.You can find them in Ar- thur Cleveland Bent's "Life Histo- ries," in John K. Terres's Audubon SocietyEncyclopedia of North Amer- ican Birds, and in field guides, man- uals, and regionalbird books.But put- ting them on recordwas far from easy. Had you asked the same competent birder the samequestion 80 yearsago, you would have received an equally The uncommonBlack Swift, at their nest.Photograph/ T.J. Ulrich/17REO (u02/1/021). quick answer. It would have been quite different, and quite wrong. cleft and disappeared.Peering into the thrasher that bears his name, had re- The Black Swift is not a common crevice, Vrooman saw a single white ported a colony of Black Swifts nest- or widespreadbird. It was discovered egg in a small, damp depressionbe- ing on a high cliff on the upper Co- more then two centuries ago in the hind a tuft of grass.Not certain that lumbia River, not on the coast. But West Indies, but the first North Amer- the bird had finished laying, he left becausethe colony was inaccessible, ican birds were not found until the the nest undisturbed.
    [Show full text]
  • Columba Livia
    Columba livia -- Gmelin, 1789 ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- COLUMBIFORMES -- COLUMBIDAE Common names: Rock Dove; Common Pigeon; Pigeon biset; Rock DoveI European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) In Europe this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). The population trend is not known, but the population is not believed to be decreasing sufficiently rapidly to approach the thresholds under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in Europe. Within the EU27 this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). The population trend appears to be stable, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in the EU27. Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Introduced: Denmark; Liechtenstein; Netherlands; Gibraltar (to UK) Native: Albania; Andorra; Armenia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Faroe Islands (to DK); Estonia; Finland; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Iceland; Ireland, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico
    Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico. 2006 Annual Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Farmington and Taos Field Offices New Mexico Prepared by: Hawks Aloft, Inc. P.O. Box 10028 Albuquerque, NM 87184 (505) 828-9455 E-mail: [email protected] Golden Eagle and Raptor Surveys, Farmington and Taos Field Offices, 2005 20 December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Distribution and reproductive success for Golden Eagles on BLM Administered Land in San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba, and Sandoval Counties, New Mexico. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................2 Study areas .......................................................................................................................................3 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................3 Results ..............................................................................................................................................5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................7 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Lakes Steward
    Highland Lakes Steward HIGHLAND LAKES CHAPTER July 2015 Volume 6, Issue 7 MISSION by Cris Faught The Texas Master PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Naturalist program is come and go many times instead of stay- a natural resource- Can you identify this animal? ing for an extended time. My feeder is based volunteer train- 1. Omnivore. ing and development within easy sight and sound of the front 2. Lives in close proximity to you. program sponsored porch, and they never seemed to mind 3. Range up to 4500 acres in rural statewide by Texas us looking at or talking about them. A&M AgriLife Exten- areas. These are wild though, so they know sion and the Texas 4. Has a reputation for being very Parks and Wildlife what boundaries are and closely smart. Department. watched us to monitor any infractions of 5. Has an average of six siblings and The mission of the their safety lines. They can make over program is to develop lives up to 12 years. 40 sounds including yips, howls and a corps of well- 6. Can't fly but can climb. informed volunteers growls. The one I heard sounded who provide educa- Ok, no big surprise, but the fox is an enough like a scream or a raven call that tion, outreach, and amazing animal to have around, as you I knew I was being warned to come no service dedicated to know, if you have ever had the oppor- the beneficial manage- closer. I didn't. tunity to watch them. I had the pleasure ment of natural re- The next time you see their boundary of watching a pair of red foxes feed at my sources and natural marker or their playful antics, I hope you areas within their sunflower seed feeder on several occa- will stay long enough to observe them in communities for the sions and they are amazing! state of Texas action.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorrected Proof
    Policy and Practice UNCORRECTED PROOF BBarney_C011.inddarney_C011.indd 117979 99/13/2008/13/2008 44:11:24:11:24 PPMM UNCORRECTED PROOF BBarney_C011.inddarney_C011.indd 118080 99/13/2008/13/2008 44:11:24:11:24 PPMM Copy edited by Richard Beatty 11 Conservation Values from Falconry Robert E. Kenward Anatrack Ltd and IUCN-SSC European Sustainable Use Specialist Group, Wareham, UK Introduction Falconry is a type of recreational hunting. This chapter considers the conser- vation issues surrounding this practice. It provides a historical background and then discusses how falconry’s role in conservation has developed and how it could grow in the future. Falconry, as defi ned by the International Association for Falconry and Conservation of Birds of Prey (IAF), is the hunting art of taking quarry in its natural state and habitat with birds of prey. Species commonly used for hunt- ing include eagles of the genera Aquila and Hieraëtus, other ‘broad-winged’ members of the Accipitrinae including the more aggressive buzzards and their relatives, ‘short-winged’ hawks of the genus Accipiter and ‘long-winged’ falcons (genus Falco). Falconers occur in more than 60 countries worldwide, mostly in North America, the Middle East, Europe, Central Asia, Japan and southern Africa. Of these countries, 48 are members of the IAF. In the European Union falconry Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Science and Practice, 1st edition. Edited by B. Dickson, J. Hutton and B. Adams. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing, UNCORRECTEDISBN 978-1-4051-6785-7 (pb) and 978-1-4051-9142-5 (hb). PROOF BBarney_C011.inddarney_C011.indd 118181 99/13/2008/13/2008 44:11:24:11:24 PPMM Copy edited by Richard Beatty 182 ROBERT E.
    [Show full text]