DOCSLIB.ORG

Crime in Alabama 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crime in Alabama 2017 Crime in Alabama 2017 A PUBLICATION OF THE ALABAMA LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES DIVISION MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT We at the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency (ALEA) are committed to improving public safety in the state of Alabama. As part of this multifaceted law enforcement agency, we strive to provide a variety of services and programs to citizens, as well as law enforcement agencies (LEAs) across the state. Additionally each year, our agency partners with municipal, county, university, state and drug task force agencies to produce Crime in Alabama as part of our Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program. Now in its 42st year, Crime in Alabama is a statistical analysis of municipal and county law enforcement agencies. In it, you will find details on criminal activity that occurred in Alabama during 2017 for various LEAs in Alabama. Using methodology prescribed by Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Program, it includes data sets for Part I crimes -- Homicide, Rape, Robbery, Assault, Burglary, Larceny, Motor Vehicle Theft and Arson. In addition, it contains data for other crimes, arrests, clearances and law enforcement employees. I must stress that Crime in Alabama is not designed to compare these law enforcement agencies. It is simply a resource to measure each agency’s response to crime. We appreciate your interest and hope you find the publication’s collection of data of use. Sincerely, Hal Taylor, Secretary of Law Enforcement 1 Crime in Alabama 2017 Dedication This report is dedicated to Alabama’s Law Enforcement Officers who protect and defend the citizens of this state. HONORING THEIR SERVICE. REMEMBERING THEIR SACRIFICE. 2 Crime in Alabama 2017 PREFACE The 2017 Crime in Alabama report is intended to inform law enforcement officials and private citizens of criminal and law enforcement activity reported in county and municipal jurisdictions in Alabama. Since the UCR offense and arrest data are the basis of this report, it must be noted that other factors affecting crime are not measured by UCR, such as age, sex, and race of the population, economic conditions of the area, transient population, culture, education, climate, attitudes of the victims toward crime and police, and crime reporting practices of the citizens. Therefore, it is difficult to draw conclusions or make valid comparisons between various local jurisdictions by using only the crime and arrest data in this publication. The data in this publication is used for crime problems inherent in the criminal justice system and as a foundation for planning and budgeting. Geographic areas covered in this report include that State of Alabama, county, and city strata. We would like to extend our appreciation to local law enforcement agencies – sheriffs’ departments, municipal police departments, and campus police – for their cooperation in the UCR program. Please Note In 2013, The FBI UCR Program initiated collection of data under a new definition for forcible rape. The term “forcible” was removed, and the definition changed to “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetrations by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” Rape statistics found in this report are not an actual representation of comparative data from 2013 to 2017. 3 Crime in Alabama 2017 CRIME AND ARREST DATA Valid crime data can provide a solid foundation for statistical analyses, management-oriented analyses and crime breakdowns. These analyses can then aid local police departments and county sheriff departments in laying out patrol districts, assigning patrol units, and designating community education programs. Data used in this report are provided by the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency (ALEA). ALEA’s data center houses the official state repository for reported arrests and offenses, and is responsible for collecting and disseminating crime data. In 2017, approximately 360 agencies reported known offenses to Alabama’s UCR; more than 99 percent of Alabama’s law enforcement agencies submitted Incident Reports. Through a mandate of Congress, Arson is counted as a Part I Offense. So as not to distort crime trends in Total and Property Crime indices, Arson total will not be included in these sections but will be included in a separate section following property crimes. Crime data is obtained from the Part I Index of Offenses submitted by law enforcement agencies to Alabama’s UCR program. These Part I Offenses are divided into Violent Crimes and Property Crimes. Violent Crimes include Homicide, Rape*, Robbery, and Assault. These crimes are considered violent in as much as they are offenses perpetrated against a person(s) with a high risk or injury or death to the victim(s). Property Crimes comprise Burglary, Larceny, Motor Vehicle Theft, and Arson**. Property or Nonviolent Crimes lack the aspect of force and/or bodily harm to the victim(s). Clearance and arrest data is also reported to Alabama’s UCR. A crime is considered cleared, either by arrest or by exceptional means, when enough evidence is found to charge a suspect and take him/her into custody. It is conceivable that one arrest could clear several offenses or that several arrests could clear one offense. The clearance rate is achieved by taking the number of clearance over the number of crimes reported. CLEARANCE RATE = CLEARANCES REPORTED CRIMES This report is a composite picture of county and municipal crime and law enforcement activity in Alabama for 2017. It provides a breakdown of individual county and municipal jurisdictions as well as cumulative data for the State from the localities participating in the UCR program. The report concentrates on the Index Crimes of the FBI’s Part I Offenses and offers tabular and narrative formats for comparisons, trends, rates, and percent changes. *Prior to 2013, Rape included only female victims. In 2013, the definition of rape was expanded by the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program to include male victims and other types of sexual assault offenses. Because of this change, the number of reported rapes increased significantly from 2012. **A separate section on Arson will be included in this report. 4 Crime in Alabama 2017 5 Crime in Alabama 2017 CRIME TRENDS FOR 2013 – 2017 OFFENSES 159,032 2017 135,060 23,972 165,505 2016 25,188 140,317 162,476 2015 140,197 22,279 164,516 2014 144,888 19,628 173,916 2013 153,694 20,222 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 Total Property Violent VIOLENT CRIMES 17,760 3,888 2017 1,928 396 18,362 4,557 2016 1,873 396 15,432 4,506 2015 1,988 353 12,987 4,481 2014 1,890 270 13,389 2013 1,978 4,513 342 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 Assault Robbery Rape Homicide PROPERTY CRIMES 12,006 2017 93,325 29,729 11,389 2016 95,682 33,246 9,996 2015 96,042 34,159 9,570 2014 97,964 37,354 10,046 2013 103,465 40,183 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 Auto Theft Larceny Burglary 6 Crime in Alabama 2017 2,798 28 150 2,077 7,546 462 997 11,341 1,437 13,418 2,199 38 6,738 136 1,782 318 9,801 864 1,290 11,583 FOR 2017 TRENDS MONTHLY 2,254 31 148 2,051 7,282 309 10,440 904 1,563 12,491 2,449 CRIMES PROPERTY 26 Homicide 181 CRIMES VIOLENT 2,289 7,282 322 11,292 992 Burglary 1,760 13,581 36 Violent 2,653 OFFENSES 197 2,274 8,394 341 12,093 1,046 1,700 14,367 Rape Larceny 30 2,603 2,295 185 Property 8,421 351 12,162 1,137 1,729 14,457 Robbery 2,840 51 164 2,160 8,894 Theft Auto 326 12,860 1,126 1,619 15,020 Total 41 2,593 Assault 211 2,154 8,599 321 12,304 1,112 1,581 14,458 2,211 32 169 1,766 7,508 274 10,695 976 1,291 12,461 2,466 26 133 1,896 8,018 295 11,561 1,077 1,442 13,457 2,303 33 Crime in Alabama 2017 2017 Alabama in Crime 144 1,623 7,060 289 10,212 849 1,157 11,835 2,360 24 1,605 110 7,014 280 10,299 925 1,191 11,904 7 7 CLEARANCES 2013 - 2017 200,000 173,916 164,516 162,476 165,505 159,032 150,000 100,000 50,000 42,507 42,281 40,571 40,140 38,780 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Offenses Clearances VIOLENT CRIMES 20000 17,760 15000 10000 7,184 5000 3,888 1,928 797 1,347 396 212 0 OFFENSES CLEARANCES Homicide Rape Robbery Assault PROPERTY CRIMES 100,000 93,325 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 29,729 30,000 21,507 20,000 12,006 9,570 10,000 4,452 0 OFFENSES CLEARANCES Burglary Larceny Auto Theft 8 Crime in Alabama 2017 VIOLENT CRIMES 2013 - 2017 17,760 2017 1,928 3,888 396 18,362 4,557 2016 1,873 396 15,432 4,506 2015 1,988 353 12,987 4,481 2014 1,890 270 13,389 2013 1,978 4,513 342 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 Assault Robbery Rape Homicide CLEARANCES - 2017 20000 17,760 15000 10000 7,184 5000 3,888 1,928 797 1,347 396 212 0 OFFENSES CLEARANCES Homicide Rape Robbery Assault MONTHLY - 2017 Homicide Rape Robbery Assault 1,760 1,729 1,700 1,619 1,581 1,563 1,442 1,437 1,290 1,291 1,191 1,157 462 351 341 326 322 321 318 309 295 289 280 274 211 197 185 181 169 164 150 148 144 136 133 110 51 41 38 36 31 30 32 33 28 26 26 24 9 Crime in Alabama 2017 HOMICIDES 500 396 396 400 342 353 300 270 257 196 192 212 200 153 100 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Homicides Clearances VICTIM RACE GENDER 3% 1% 20% 20% 78% 80% Asian Black White Unknown Male Female OFFENDER RACE GENDER 0% 14% 24% 9% 10% 66% 76% Asian Black Unknown White Male Female Unknown 10 Crime in Alabama 2017 RAPE 2,500 1,978 1,978 1,988 1,873 1,928 2,000 1,500 887 863 1,000 826 794 797 500 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Rapes Clearances VICTIM RACE GENDER 20% 3% 5% 10% 78% 90% Asian Black White Unknown Male Female Unknown
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive Plan P Age Intentionally Left Blank
    2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN P AGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Mayor J OHNNY H AMMOCK City Council J EREMY T AUNTON S ARA H ILL D AMIAN C ARR D ARRELL W ILSON T ERREL D . B ROWN B ILL G OODWIN D AVID S TOUGH Acknowledgements Planning Commission B ETH T URNER , S ECRETARY T h a n k y o u to a l l of t h e individuals J OYCE V ELLA t h a t m a d e t h i s plan p o s s i b l e . M a y H ERBERT M ASON , V ICE- C HAIR it t r a n s f o r m T a l l a s s e e i n t o t h e c i t y W ILLIE S MITH t h e c i t i z e n s d e s i r e . C LIFF J ONES J OEY S CARBOROUGH J EREMY T AUNTON , C OUNCIL R EP. A NDY C OKER Plan Prepared by C ENTRAL A LABAMA R EGIONAL P LANNING AND D EVELOPMENT C OMMISSION Additional Thanks To: C ITY OF T ALLASSEE E MPLOYEES T ALLASSEE C ITY S CHOOL D ISTRICT A ND EACH CITIZEN OF T ALLASSEE WHO GAVE UP THEIR TIME TO HELP CREATE THIS PLAN . CITY OF TALLASSEE T REASURE ON THE T ALLAPOOSA “To provide a hi gh quality of life for our citizens while promoting balanced economic growth and preserving our natural beauty, diversity, and historic character.” - City of Tallassee Vision Statement CITY OF TALLASSEE 2040 Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND AND VISION HISTORY .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community College Campus Carry Policy Network Analysis
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE CAMPUS CARRY POLICY NETWORK ANALYSIS Joel Alvarado Georgia Piedmont Technical College Sheila Toppin Clark Atlanta University Atlanta, Georgia October 2017 Author Note: Correspondence regarding this article should be addressed to Sheila Toppin, Assistant Professor, Clark Atlanta University, Public Administration Department, 223 James P. Brawley Drive, McPheeters-Dennis Hall Room 280, Atlanta, GA 30314. Phone: 404-880-6650. Email: [email protected] 2 COMMUNITY COLLEGE CAMPUS CARRY POLICY NETWORK ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………… 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….. 3 Literature Review…………………………………………………………………. 6 Postsecondary Institutions………………………………………………… 6 Background of the Problem……………………………………………….. 7 Analysis of the Problem…………………………………………………………… 9 Analytical Framework…………………………………………………….. 10 Policy Network Analysis………………………………………………….. 14 Research Methodology…………………………………………………………… 24 Research Design…………………………………………………………. 24 Data Analysis…………………………………………………………….. 25 Findings………………………………………………………………….. 31 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………. 32 References……………………………………………………………………….. 35 Appendices………………………………………………………………………. 42 3 ABSTRACT This study provides a policy network analysis on the implications of HB 792 and HB 280 at urban two-year open campuses, with specific attention to Georgia Piedmont Technical College (GPTC), a unit of the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG). Georgia state legislators passed House Bills 792 and 280, which authorized any person 18 years
    [Show full text]
  • The-Womens-Fund-Invisibility.Pdf
    This report was funded by a grant from The Women’s Fund of Greater Birmingham. Points of View do not necessarily represent the official position of the Women’s Fund of Birmingham. Report prepared by: Allison Miller, MPH Youth and Family Services Network Consultant Author Sara Jane Camacho Program Director of Freedom to Thrive, a program of Youth and Family Services Network Co-Author Rachel Brzezinski, UAB Candidate for MPH Youth and Family Services Network Consultant Transcription and citations Sherry L. Allen, MEd, NCC, LPC, GPC President/CEO of Youth and Family Services Network Page 2 Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for contributing their guidance and information to this report. The Freedom to Thrive Youth Service Provision Work Group for providing the vision for this project from the very beginning and for making Invisibility possible. Thank you for all of the hard work that each of you do providing meaningful and important direct service to high-risk youth in our area. Chair: Phil Cain, Assistant Director - Family Connection, Inc Members: Gayle Watts, LCSW, Executive Director, Children's Aid Society; Christie Mac Segars, LCSW, Director of Agency Development, Children's Aid Society; Rhonda Noble, Project Independence, Children’s Aid Society; Alice Westerly, Homeless Advocate, Cultural Affairs Committee; Cherie Foster, Intake Supervisor, Jefferson County Family Court; Helen Smith, Victim Witness Specialist, FBI; Debbi Land, Director, Clay House Children’s Center; Shemeca
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice Issues in the States
    <-I rIO I - j i CRIMINAL JUSTICE ISSUES IN THE STATES 1993 DIRECTORY Volume X Prepared by Karen F.. Gasson-Maline Richard Florence September 1993 Published by - ---- - - - . ---- = :=..=-= ._----..=.. ~..:.=-=.=..= - Justice Research and Statistics Association with support from the Bureau of Justice Statistics JRSA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1992-1993 President Richard P. Kern, Ph.D. Director Criminal Justice Research Institute Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Vice-Prr ;;;'ident Norman Dakake Director Statistical Analysis Center Rhode Island Governor's Justice Commission Secretary/Treasurer William Holmes, Ph.D. Director Statistical Analysis Center Massachusetts Committee on Criminal Justice Delegate Daniel Storkamp Director 144791 Minnesota Criminal Justice Statistical U.S. Department of Justice Analysis Center National institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the Appointed Delegate person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in Ernest Cowles, Ph.D this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent Assistant Professor the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Center for the Study of Crime, Permission to reproduce this liliiii "giIII!<J material has been Delinquency & Corrections gra~~mic Domain/OJP /BJS Southern Illinois University at Carbondale U.S. Department of JusLice Past President to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Michael J. Sabath, Ph.D. Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission Associate Professor of the ~ owner. San Diego State University Imperial Valley Campus STAFF Joan C. Weiss, Executive Director David Kessler, Ph.D., Director of Research James Zepp, Director, JRSA National Computer Center Sandra E. Leitch, Director of Finance Karen F.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Mandatory Sentencing Policies on Alabama's Prison Populations Stephanie Elaine Stewart Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2019 Impact of Mandatory Sentencing Policies on Alabama's Prison Populations Stephanie Elaine Stewart Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons, Public Administration Commons, and the Public Policy Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Stephanie E. Stewart has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Anthony Fleming, Committee Chairperson, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. John Walker, Committee Member, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Paul Rutledge, University Reviewer, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2019 Abstract Impact of Mandatory Sentencing Policies on Alabama’s Prison Populations by Stephanie E. Stewart MPA, Auburn University Montgomery, 2007 BS, Faulkner University, 2001 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Public Administration Walden University August 2019 Abstract State prison systems, particularly in the Southern US, have been overpopulated for decades with unlikely support for building new prisons which has led to overcrowding.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Justice for Victims of Crime in Alabama
    This booklet was published with the generous support of Greg Reeves Gregory Zarzaur The Reeves Law Firm Zarzaur Mujumdar & Decatur, Alabama Debrosse - Trial Lawyers Birmingham, Alabama Civil Justice for Victims of Crime in Alabama For referrals to an attorney or more information, please call the National Crime Victim Bar Association at (202) 467-8716 or toll free at (844) LAW- HELP is an affiliate of: 2000 M Street, NW, Suite 480 Washington, DC 20036 202-467-8753 [email protected] • www.victimbar.org ©2017 National Center for Victims of Crime Printing 05/17, 14M CIVIL JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME IN ALABAMA C1 Civil Justice for Table of Contents Victims of Crime I. Purpose of This Booklet ............................................2 II. Victims’ Financial Losses and in Alabama Potential Sources of Compensation .......................2 III. Why File a Civil Lawsuit? ..........................................4 IV. Civil vs. Criminal Justice ..........................................5 V. Parties in a Civil Suit ................................................8 The National Crime Victim Bar Association 2000 M Street, Suite 480 VI. Statutes of Limitations .............................................9 Washington, DC 20036 VII. Types of Civil Lawsuits ............................................10 (202)467-8753 VIII. Victim Privacy .........................................................11 [email protected] www.victimbar.org IX. Filing a Civil Lawsuit ..............................................11 X. Discovery ..................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • And Protective Action
    and Alabama Farms: Victimization, Subjective Assessment, and Protective Action Bulletin 616 June 1992 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Auburn University Lowell T. Frobish, Director Auburn University, Alabama CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ......................... 3 PURPOSE OF STUDY...................... 5 STUDY DESIGN.......................... 5 DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE FARMS ........ 8 FARM OPERATORS .......................... 8 FARM OPERATIONS ......................... 9 FARM ECOLOGY ........................... 10 FARM CRIME VICTIMIZATION EXPERIENCE ......................... 12 VANDALISM IN PAST 12 MONTHS ............. 13 BURGLARY IN PAST 12 MONTHS............... 18 THEFT IN PAST 12 MONTHS.................. 19 CRIME OVER OPERATOR'S FARMING LIFETIME ..... 20 OPINIONS AND ATTITUDES ABOUT FARM CRIME .............. 23 COMMUNITY TRENDS IN FARM CRIME ........... 23 SERIOUSNESS OF LOCAL FARM CRIME PROBLEM ... 25 ATTITUDES TOWARD RURAL AND FARM CRIME ..... 28 FEAR OF FARM CRIME VICTIMIZATION .......... 31 ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS TOWARD LAW ENFORCEMENT...................... 34 PROTECTING FARM PROPERTY........... 38 SECURITY DEVICE AVAILABILITY............... 38 SECURITY BEHAVIOR PRACTICES ............... 43 SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON PREVENTION OF FARM CRIME ............... 47 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ........... 48 LITERATURE CITED .................... 52 APPENDIX ............................. 54 FIRST PRINTING 3.5M, JUNE 1992 Information contained herein is available to all persons without regard to race, color, sex, or national origin. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Community Counts
    COMMUNITY COUNTS MEASURING PROGRESS in CALHOUN COUNTY, ALABAMA August 1, 2006 2006 Calhoun County Community Counts Funded through the generosity of: ALABAMA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN Created through the expertise of: Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama 402 Samford Hall Birmingham, AL 35229 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction i How to Read Community Counts ii Regional Description iii Community Counts 1 Index of Indicators 2 Indicators of the People Dimension 6 Indicators of the Prosperity Dimension 50 Learning Indicators of the Prosperity Dimension 77 Indicators of the Place Dimension 85 Blueprint for School Readiness Introduction 101 Indicator for the Blueprint for School Readiness 103 Appendix I A-1 Appendix II: Sources for Indicators A-3 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of an effort to measure where Calhoun County and its cities stand in terms of social, economic, and environmental characteristics which reflect the quality of life in the County. The heart of the report consists of a number of community indicators representing key features of the social, economic, and environmental landscape of the County. The intention is to track the indicators over time, reproducing the report periodically, to show progress as it occurs and identify problem areas that need attention in order to create a more vital, healthy regional community. The Foundation asked the Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama to create a report measuring the status of Calhoun County and select municipalities within. These municipalities include Anniston, Hobson City, Jacksonville, Ohatchee, Oxford and Piedmont. In the case where municipality data were not available, comparable counties within Alabama were chosen to measure alongside Calhoun County.
    [Show full text]
  • 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 U.S. Department of Justice Law
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. J • ; I ~, , J " "'",,". - ~ -. - . ~.~ ..., '"' r .~ .. , . , " : "' :' . , This microfiche was produced from documents received for " - . inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise , .... ~ contrll! over the physical condition of the documents submitted, , : .~ .:..'" , , , ,. , , the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on \' , ., this frame may bo used to evaluate the document quality. .."I 2 5 1.0 ~~ 111112.8 11111 . S;,;. 111111.:£ ,2 a;;.; 111 v_ 1111_1136 =: ~~.;g l- 1.1 I-........." 'r I 111111.8 1, 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY HlSOLLJ liON IlS I CHART f\jL\TI(If'1lil"Hllh'[AlJ rLf ""'\~ll,'d(lJ": 1(.\ A Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with , ~. ~he standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504 Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authorls) and do not represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20531 !., D ate f i I m e d, •\\ I I ! ! I· i, I' Master Plan Overview !, i L I' "'," State Supervisory Board of the Alabama Law Enfol'cement Planning Agency George C. Wallace, Governor, State of Alabama Earl Morgan, Chairman, State Supervisory Board Robert G. "Bo" Davis, Director, Alabama Law Enforcement Planning Agency Mr. Treice Atkinson Mr. Otis MacMahon Mr. Edward Bailey Judge John 1. Moore Sheriff Wilson Baker Mrs. Ruby Noonan Mr. Julian Bland Mr. Bill Pinezza *Captain Bob Bryant Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • NLADA Report
    -- - MICHIGAN IN SYSTEMS DEFENSE INDIGENT TRIAL-LEVEL EVALUATION TRIAL-LEVEL INDIGENT DEFENSE SYSTEMS IN MICHIGAN IN SYSTEMS INDIGENT DEFENSE TRIAL-LEVEL EVALUATION AA RaceRace toto thethe BottomBottom SpeedSpeed && SavingsSavings OverOver DDueue Process:Process: AA ConstitutionalConstitutional CrisisCrisis June 2008 Evaluation of Trial-Level Indigent Defense Systems in Michigan is a publication of the National Legal Aid & Defender Association. © Copyright 2008. No reprinting without the express permission of NLADA. Evaluation of Trial-Level Indigent Defense Systems in Michigan A Race to the Bottom Speed & Savings Over Due Process: A Constitutional Crisis June 2008 Researched & Written by: National Legal Aid & Defender Association Executive Summary he National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) finds that the state of Michi- gan fails to provide competent representation to those who cannot afford counsel in its criminal courts. The state of Michigan’s denial of its constitutional obligations has Tproduced myriad public defense systems that vary greatly in defining who qualifies for services and the competency of the services rendered. Though the level of services varies from county to county – giving credence to the proposition that the level of justice a poor person receives is dependent entirely on which side of a county line one’s crime is alleged to have been committed instead of the factual merits of the case – NLADA finds that none of the public defender services in the sample counties are constitutionally adequate. These conclusions were reached after an extensive year-long study of indigent defense services in ten representative counties in partnership with the State Bar of Michigan and on behalf of the Michigan Legislature under a concurrent resolution (SCR 39 of 2006 ).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Key Trends and Indicators 2005 UPDATE
    Chapter 1 Key Trends and Indicators 2005 UPDATE KEY TRENDS AND INDICATORS—2005 UPDATE This chapter is an updated summary of the Greensboro City Data Book, with selected trends and indicators chosen from other chapters in the Book because of their importance in di- rectly effecting the future growth and development of Greensboro. It is hoped that these major issues will provide a glimpse into the City and its place within the Triad region, from annual population to home sales by zip code. The criteria for selecting a trend or an indicator to be monitored are that: · the analysis of pertinent data result in change rates that can be tracked over time; · the indicator or trend influences various policies; · the indicator or trend can be measured against state and national data or regulatory standards; and/or · the indicator or trend is a regional force that can impact Greensboro’s future over the next 20 years. The key indicators and trends chosen for inclusion in the Greensboro City Data Book simply provide a starting point from which further assessment and analysis may be meaningful and useful to the ongoing review and revision of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. These indica- tors will be followed, with a few potential alterations, throughout the coming years in order to examine trends that are impacting the City. List of Key Trends and Indicators • Employment Growth in Triad Regional Counties; • Triad Regional Retail Sales; • Greensboro Annual Population Growth; • Per Capita Income by Selected Areas; • Greensboro Unemployment Rate; • Guilford County Employment by Sector; • Average Sales Prices of Homes by Zip Code in Guilford County; • Triad Regional Ozone Exceedances; • Peak Water Capacity and Demand for Greensboro Service Area; • Sewer Capacity and Demand for Greensboro Service Area; • PTIA, Average Number of Flights Per Day; 1-1, supp.
    [Show full text]
  • 90085NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. <C, --~ I I; ALABAMA ~ STATISTICAL ( ANALYSIS CENTER CR1ME'I'N'ALABAMA 1969-1~77,: . A PRECIS·J~ \), /'\ U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organizatkm originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been I~ granted by • • • Alabama Crlmlnal Justlce '" Informatlon Center " ., ~ to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system r!lquires permis­ '\) sion of the copyright owner. II ~ STATE"OF ALABAMA CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION CENTER R~W.BLAVl.OCK ""Director o \\ r1 () eb- <l ' CRIME IN ALABAMA ., o INTRODUCTION Crime in Alabama, as in the rest of the un:iilieall$'t@:J?'§"~\{g~,:]~corded in the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports. County~and municipal law enforce- ment agencies submit monthly crime summaries to the Uniform Crime Reporting Section (UCR) of the FBI which generates automated reports for Alabama1 • () Of the 3542 identified law enforcement agencies in Alabama in 1975, 33% of the agencies, representing 75% of the state's population, sub- o " mitted UCR data. (For the first quarter of 1976, reporting has increased to include 98.2% of the state's population.) The Uniform Crime Reports deal with the FBI's seven index crimes which are grouped into person, or " C? violent crimes,3 and property crimes.
    [Show full text]