DOCSLIB.ORG

Grand Circle Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grand Circle Corporation IEE Antarctic Peninsula Cruise Program – MV Corinthian Multi-year Assessment Grand Circle Corporation Initial Environmental Evaluation for Antarctic Peninsula Ship-based Tourism Aboard MV Corinthian Five-year Programmatic Assessment December 2014 – March 2019 Submitted 12 September 2017 to US Environmental Protection Agency for Activities during the 2017-18 Season Grand Circle Corporation Page 1 IEE Antarctic Peninsula Cruise Program – MV Corinthian Multi-year Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONTACT DETAILS ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Description of the Proposed Activity ................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Alternatives ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Assessment of Potential Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Minimization and Mitigation ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.5 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 3. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 11 3.1 Scope of the Evaluation ................................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Company Description ....................................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Vessel Specifications ........................................................................................................................................ 13 3.4 Vessel Operations ............................................................................................................................................ 18 3.4.1 In General ....................................................................................................................................... 18 3.4.2 Relevant Laws and Regulations ...................................................................................................... 19 3.4.2.1 Antarctica ............................................................................................................................ 19 3.4.2.2 Applicable Marine Legislation ............................................................................................. 22 3.4.2.3 Safety of Vessels ................................................................................................................. 23 3.4.2.4 Safe Vessel Operations ....................................................................................................... 23 3.4.2.5 Emergency Response Action ............................................................................................... 24 3.4.2.6 Environmental Safeguards .................................................................................................. 24 3.4.3 Oil and Oily Mixtures ...................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.4 Garbage .......................................................................................................................................... 27 3.4.5 Sewage ............................................................................................................................................ 27 3.4.6 Ballast ............................................................................................................................................. 28 3.4.7 Stack Emissions ............................................................................................................................... 28 3.4.8 Avoidance of Harmful Interference with Biota ............................................................................... 29 3.4.9 Security Plan ................................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.10 Anchor Watch ............................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.11 Disembarking Passengers ............................................................................................................. 30 3.4.12 SAR Arrangements ........................................................................................................................ 30 3.4.13 Insurance Provisions ..................................................................................................................... 33 4. PROPOSED ACTIVITY .......................................................................................................................................... 36 4.1 Itinerary Planning, Site Selection, Route Planning and Management ............................................................. 36 4.2 Purpose and Value of Antarctic Tourism ......................................................................................................... 41 4.3 Location and Duration ..................................................................................................................................... 41 4.4 Small Boat Activities and Cruising .................................................................................................................... 42 4.5 Landings and Shore Activities .......................................................................................................................... 44 4.6 Education and Training of Passengers, Crew and Expedition Team ................................................................ 47 5. ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED ACTIVITY ............................................................................................................ 51 5.1 Changes to Itinerary ......................................................................................................................................... 51 5.2 Changes to Sites Visited ................................................................................................................................... 51 5.3 Changes to Number of Passengers .................................................................................................................. 51 5.4 Changes to Vessel Used ................................................................................................................................... 52 5.5 Changes to Zodiac Usage ................................................................................................................................. 52 5.6 Alternative of Not Proceeding with Cruise Program ........................................................................................ 52 Grand Circle Corporation Page 2 IEE Antarctic Peninsula Cruise Program – MV Corinthian Multi-year Assessment 6. LIKELY IMPACTS, ASSESSMENT, MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITIES ........................ 54 6.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................................... 54 6.2 Relevant Laws and Regulations ........................................................................................................................ 54 6.3 Standard Operating Procedures ....................................................................................................................... 54 6.4 Assessment of Impacts .................................................................................................................................... 57 6.5 Air ................................................................................................................................................................. 59 6.5.1 Origins .................................................................................................................................................. 59 6.5.2 Assessment .......................................................................................................................................... 60 6.5.3 Minimization and Mitigation ................................................................................................................ 60 6.6 Water - Fuel and Oil Spills ................................................................................................................................ 60 6.6.1 Origins .................................................................................................................................................. 60 6.6.2 Assessment .......................................................................................................................................... 61 6.6.3 Minimization and Mitigation ................................................................................................................ 61 6.7 Wastes Generated During the Expedition ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DEVELOPMENT of ANTARCTIC TOURISM Tadeusz PALMOWSKI
    GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year XIII, vol. 33, no. 4 supplement, 2020, p.1520-1526 ISSN 2065-1198, E-ISSN 2065-0817 DOI 10.30892/gtg.334spl11-602 DEVELOPMENT OF ANTARCTIC TOURISM Tadeusz PALMOWSKI* University of Gdańsk, Department Regional Development, Instytut Geografii, ul. Bażyńskiego 4, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Palmowski, T. (2020). DEVELOPMENT OF ANTARCTIC TOURISM. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 33(4spl), 1520–1526. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.334spl11-602 Abstract: According to some specialists, Antarctic tourism is one of the best-managed tourism sectors in the world. It has dynamically developed in recent decades. Starting the second half of the eighties of the twentieth century, tourist figures in Antarctica grew exponentially from several hundred to 74 thousand annually. The seasonal and spatial restrictions mark its specific nature. The author believes in the need for comprehensive control of tourist activity and behaviour on the continent. The International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IATTO) promotes safe and environmentally responsible voyages to Antarctica. Education is vital during these visits, providing an opportunity to become acquainted with this exceptional continent and its merit for world science. Tourists, representing over 100 nationalities, become the ambassadors of Antarctica on returning home. Study results indicate that immoderate development of Antarctic tourism may generate threats and the introduction of related restrictions. Key words: Antarctic tourism, polar tourism, tourism development, Antarctic Treaty System, IAATO. * * * * * * INTRODUCTION Antarctica embraces the continent itself and surrounding waters. The name itself conjures up visions of mountains with flowing glaciers, menacing seas sprinkled with icebergs and animals not to be met elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Expedition
    Antarctic Expedition 11 Days Antarctic Expedition Take a once-in-a-lifetime journey to the "last continent", an unspoiled landscape of glaciers and icy pristine waters. Cross the Drake Passage by ship and prep for the adventure with engaging talks and presentations. Once there, sea conditions determine the itinerary, but our ships call on remarkable places such as Deception Island — a volcanic caldera that we can sail into — and Paradise Bay, a favorite spot for Zodiac cruising to see fantastical iceberg sculptures. Opportunities abound to see penguins, seals, seabirds, and whales, who raise their young in this frozen paradise. Details Testimonials Arrive: Ushuaia, Argentina "I've taken six MTS trips and they have all exceeded my expectations. Depart: Ushuaia, Argentina The staff, the food, the logistics and the communications have always been Duration: 11 Days exceptional. Thank you for being my "go to" adventure travel company!" Group Size: Up to 96 Guests Margaret I. Minimum Age: 10 Years Old "I have traveled extensively around the Activity Level: Level 1 world. The experience with MTS was by . far the best I have ever had. Thank you for such excellence." Marianne W. REASON #01 REASON #02 REASON #03 MT Sobek's Polar Value We include emergency medical Over 30 years offering polar Promise means that we offer insurance and emergency evacuation voyages we have built strong in-house services to help coverage as a value-added benefit relationships with polar plan and execute you polar at no additional cost to you. outfitters and ships that adventure for no added cost. cruise the 7th continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination Guide
    antarcticaDESTINATION GUIDE: LEARN WHY ANTARCTICA IS UNLIKE ANY OTHER DESTINATION 1 Why discover Antarctica with Hurtigruten? Fantastic adventure Hurtigruten provides its guests unparalleled experiences in Antarctica’s polar waters, safely taking you on exciting small-boat (RIB) adventures and amazing landings to explore the most remote continent on Earth. Close to nature We offer the opportunity to get close to beautiful icebergs, visit isolated scientific stations, and encounter amazing wildlife, such as penguins, seals, and whales. Unmatched wilderness No travel adventure can match an expedition cruise to Antarctica: the windiest, driest, and most pristine continent on the planet. Our voyages into this protected wilderness are truly unique and offer extraordinary travel experiences. We promise Antarctica is different from any other destination you’ll ever visit. Choose your expedition cruise Hurtigruten offers a wide variety of itineraries, expedition ships, and activities from which to chose. Experience a Total Solar Eclipse In 2021, a rare Total Solar Eclipse will grace our expeditions to Antarctica, and there is no better place to see the event than from aboard our ships in the South Orkney Islands, guided by an astronomer. Which Antarctica adventure is right for you? URTIGRUTEN URTIGRUTEN H 2 3 © SHAYNE / / SHAYNE © Included in your Expedition NER S S U A KL REA D AN Expert guiding The Expedition Team members are specialists in their © with the Expedition field, selected for your specific voyage and itinerary. They Team will join you on included activities, host lectures, and lead educational sessions on board and ashore. Activities Join us on a series of included activities designed to immerse on board and you in your destinations, including small-boat (RIB) cruising on shore and onshore exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutzung Aktueller Erkenntnisse Aus Der Polarforschung Für Die Antarktis-Umweltschutzaufgaben
    Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3713 85 100 UBA-FB-00 Nutzung aktueller Erkenntnisse aus der Polarfor- schung für die Antarktis-Umweltschutzaufgaben von Michaela Mayer INASEA - Institut für nachhaltige Aktivitäten auf See‚ Bremen Klaus Lucke Perth Max Schuster DW Shipconsult, Kiel Karen von Juterzenka Bremen Hans-Peter Reinthaler Linz Beate Lange INASEA Institut für nachhaltige Aktivitäten‚ Bremen INASEA – Institut für nachhaltige Aktivitäten auf See Dr. Michaela Mayer Kirchlintelner Str. 3 D-28325 Bremen Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Abschlussdatum 2016 UBA Texte Nutzung aktueller Erkenntnisse aus der Polarforschung für die Antarktis-Umweltschutzaufgaben Kurzbeschreibung Eine 1999 veröffentlichte Studie (Carstens et al., 1999; FKZ 29625507) beinahe gleichen Wortlauts stellt bereits wesentliche Erkenntnisse aus der marinen Ökosystemforschung hinsichtlich ihrer Rele- vanz für die Durchführung von Genehmigungsverfahren von Forschungsvorhaben und touristischen Aktivitäten nach dem AUG dar. Aufgrund fortgeschrittener technischer Entwicklungen der bei der Polarforschung zum Einsatz kom- menden Methoden und Geräte sowie ausgeweiteter logistischer und touristischer Aktivitäten in der Antarktis, war eine erneute Evaluation auf Grundlage des aktuellen Forschungsstandes erforderlich. Die vorliegende Studie wurde um die terrestrische Komponente der Ökosystemforschung mit deren potentiellen Umweltauswirkungen ergänzt. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, den aktuellen wissenschaftlichen
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica August 2001 United States Office of Environmental Federal Activities Protection Agency FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica Please send comments on this FEIS to either: B. Katherine Biggs Joseph Montgomery EPA, Office of Federal Activities EPA, Office of Federal Activities 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (MC 2252A) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (MC 2252A) Washington, D.C. 20460 Washington, D.C. 20460 PH: (202) 564-7144 PH: (202) 564-7157 Fax:(202) 564-0072 Fax: (202) 564-0072 August 2001 Abstract Abstract Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica Abstract The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to promulgate final regulations that provide for assessment of the potential environmental impacts of nongovernmental activities in Antarctica and for coordination of the review of information regarding environmental impact assessments (EIAs) received from other Parties under the Protocol on Environmental Protection (the Protocol) to the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 (the Treaty). The final rule will be promulgated as required by Public Law 104-227, the Antarctic Science, Tourism, and Conservation Act of 1998, 16 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., to provide for domestic implementation of the Protocol. The purpose of this Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is to summarize the analysis of the proposed alternatives for the final rule to be promulgated by EPA that will amend 40 CFR Part 8, Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuwaittimes 1-12-2019.Qxp Layout 1
    RABIA ALTHANI 4, 1441 AH SUNDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2019 28 Pages Max 26º Min 15º 150 Fils Established 1961 ISSUE NO: 17998 The First Daily in the Arabian Gulf www.kuwaittimes.net Exhibition documents late Months after abrupt halt, Trump Antarctica tourism: The quest Liverpool stretch lead as 2 Amir’s visit to UK in 1919 9 gives blessing for Taleban deal 22 for Earth’s vulnerable extremes 28 Man City, Chelsea stumble Indian engineers worst affected by degree accreditation decision Many have lost their job titles, suffered pay cuts By Nawara Fattahova Engineers also face additional conditions. “Engineers have to pass a test if their work experience is less than KUWAIT: The manpower authority last year mandat- five years - those with longer experience only have to ed that all expat engineers should get a no-objection appear for a personal interview at KSE to obtain the certificate from the Kuwait Society of Engineers (KSE) approval. But Indian engineers can’t go through any of to have the title of “engineer” in their work permits. these procedures if they don’t hold an NBA accredita- Indian engineers have been the most affected by this tion. This is discriminatory and should be corrected. decision, as their degrees should be approved by The new rules of the ministry should only be applied on India’s National Board of Accreditation (NBA) in order new engineers and not those who have worked here for to get an NOC from KSE. But most Indian engineers in many years,” Kouh asserted. “If KSE is demanding Kuwait hold degrees that are approved by the All India NBA accreditation, then it should be demanded from all Council for Technical Education and not NBA.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Antarctic Projects Officer
    p Eli OF THE U.S. ANTARCTIC I PROJECTS OFFICER VOLUME V NUMBER 8 APRIL 1964 BULLETIN of the U.S. ANTARCTIC PROJECTS OFFICER An account of logistic and scientific programs and current events of interest in Antarctica. Published from September through June and distributed to organizations, groups, and individuals interested in United States Antarctic programs, plans, and activities. Rear Admiral James R. Reedy, US N United States Antarctic Projects Officer Vol. V, No. 8 April 1964 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS Material for this issue of the Bulletin was A Message to the Men of DEEP FREEZE 64 ........1 abstracted from United States Navy official news releases, a Secretary of Defense Monthly Digest ..................................2 official news release, THE MATS FLYER of February 1964, and National Science Fire At Hallett Station .............................3 Foundation United States Antarctic Research Program Antarctic Status Reports for Nov- Pier Carving ...................................4 ember and December 1963. Post-Season Flight to Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station Establishes Longest The United States Antarctic Projects Off- Summer Season in History of Station .......4 icer and his staff are indebted to Mr. J. H. Weir and the Honorable George Laking of Iceberg Enters Channel in McMurdo Sound .........5 the New Zealand Embassy for granting per- mission to reproduce the speech delivered On Wintering-Over ......................... .....S to the Antarctican Society on 30 January 1964, and to Mr. Earl H. Moser, Jr., of New Zealand in the Antarctic .....................6 the U. S. Naval Civil Engineering Labor- atory for preparing the article on USNCEL Navy Commissions USS RICHARD E. BYRD ........9 research and development in polar regions Geographic Names of Antarctica ..................10 All photographs are official U.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Possible Cumulative Environmental Impacts
    List of Attachments Attachment 1 Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic and Guidance for Those Organizing and Conducting Tourism and Non-governmen- tal Activities in the Antarctic (from Recommendation XVIII-1) Attachment 2 Post Visit Report Form, Parts 1 and 2 Attachment 3 Workshop Objectives Attachment 4 List of Participants Attachment 5 Workshop Agenda Attachment 6 Discussion Group Members, Facilitators and Rapporteurs Attachment 7 A Timeline Of Human Activity In Antarctica: Some Selected Highlights Attachment 8 Overview of Ship and Land Based Antarctic Tourism, 1999-2000 Attachment 9 Overview of Sites Visited in the Antarctic Peninsula (1989-1999) Attachment 10 Five Most Visited Sites in the Antarctic Peninsula area (1989-1999) Attachment 11 Antarctic Tourist Trends from 1992-93 through 1999-2000 Attachment 12 Criteria for Itinerary Planning and Site Selection Attachment 13 Sample Annual Instructions to Captains, Expedition Leaders and Staff Attachment 14 IAATO Guidelines to Visitors Attachment 15 Review of Site Characteristics Likely to Affect the Nature and Severity of Possible Cumulative Impacts Attachment 16 Maps of Antarctic Site Inventory Sub-Regions in the Antarctic Peninsula List of Attachments Ⅵ 23 Attachment 1 Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic and Guidance for Those Organizing and Conducting Tourism and Non-governmental Activities in the Antarctic (from Recommendation XVIII-1) Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Activities in the Antarctic are governed by the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 and associated agreements, referred to collectively as the Antarctic Treaty system. The Treaty established Antarctica as a zone of peace and science. In 1991, the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties adopted the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, which designates the Antarctic as a natural reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Expedition
    Antarctic Expedition 11 Days Antarctic Expedition Take a once-in-a-lifetime journey to the "last continent", an unspoiled landscape of glaciers and icy pristine waters. Cross the Drake Passage by ship and prep for the adventure with engaging talks and presentations. Once there, sea conditions determine the itinerary, but our ships call on remarkable places such as Deception Island — a volcanic caldera that we can sail into — and Paradise Bay, a favorite spot for Zodiac cruising to see fantastical iceberg sculptures. Opportunities abound to see penguins, seals, seabirds, and whales, who raise their young in this frozen paradise. Details Testimonials Arrive: Santiago or Punta Arenas, Chile"I've taken six MTS trips and they have all exceeded my expectations. The staff, the food, the logistics and Depart: Santiago or Punta Arenas, Chilethe communications have always been exceptional. Thank you for being my "go to" adventure travel Duration: 11 Days company!" Margaret I. Group Size: Up to 96 Guests Minimum Age: 10 Years Old "I have traveled extensively around the world. The experience with MTS was by far the best I have ever Activity Level: had. Thank you for such excellence." Marianne W. REASON #01 REASON #02 REASON #03 MT Sobek's Polar Value Over 30 years offering polar voyages We choose ships and operators Promise means that we offer we have built strong relationships that maintain a high level of in-house services to help with polar outfitters and ships commitment to safety, people, plan and execute you polar that cruise the 7th continent. value, quality, environment, well- adventure for no added cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Oceans & Total Solar Eclipse
    Southern Oceans & Total Solar Eclipse with Richard Polatty A ONCE-IN-A-LIFETIME FALKLAND ISLANDS, SOUTH GEORGIA AND ANTARCTIC PENINSULA ADVENTURE NOVEMBER 21 – DECEMBER 12, 2021 +510-420-1550 | [email protected] 1 2 INCA-International Nature & Cultural Adventures | www.inca1.com Eclipse-Chasing at the Bottom of the World with Richard Polatty This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to combine the chance to see a total solar eclipse with an expedition to Tierra del Fuego, the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Antarctic Peninsula. The 2021 Total Solar Eclipse will be a special event in the austral summer in the early hours of December 4, 2021. The RCGS Resolute, one of the fastest and most stable expedition ships, will be positioned directly under the path of totality in the Scotia Sea between South Georgia and South Orkney Islands. Prior to the eclipse event you explore the wildlife-rich Falkland Islands and remote South Georgia, and post-eclipse you will reach the Antarctic Peninsula. Accompanying you will be superb naturalist and Antarctic researcher Richard Polatty. Our small group with Richard will be just 20 guests. You will have the full expedition and eclipse programs aboard RCGS Resolute, plus you will have the added expertise of Richard as your private leader and guide. This is an INCA-only extra and this opportunity is simply too amazing to pass up. Interest is already heavy and space is selling fast so act quickly. King Penguins of South Georgia Island. Will they be looking at the eclipse? An Exceptional Adventure HIGHLIGHTS This epic adventure circumnavigates the Scotia Sea on an • Exclusive small group with naturalist active voyage to Tierra del Fuego, the Falkland Islands, South Richard Polatty Georgia Island, and the Antarctic Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Possible Cumulative Environmental Impacts of Commercial Ship-Based Tourism in the Antarctic Peninsula Area
    Assessment of the Possible Cumulative Environmental Impacts of Commercial Ship-Based Tourism in the Antarctic Peninsula Area Proceedings of a Workshop Held in La Jolla, California, 7–9 June 2000 Cover photograph: Gentoo penguins at a rookery near the Antarctic Peninsula. Credit: NSF photograph Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the partic- ipants, and do not necessarily represent the official views, opinions, or policy of the National Science Foundation. Assessment of the Possible Cumulative Environmental Impacts of Commercial Ship-Based Tourism in the Antarctic Peninsula Area Proceedings of a Workshop Held in La Jolla, California, 7–9 June 2000 Edited by Robert J. Hofman (retired), Marine Mammal Commission Joyce Jatko, Environmental Officer, Office of Polar Programs Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................. v 1. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 2. Overview of commercial ship-based tour operations in the Peninsula area................................................................................ 2 3. Examples of possible cumulative environmental impacts .............. 5 4. Site variables affecting possible cumulative effects ....................... 7 5. Activity variables possibly affecting cumulative impacts ............ 10 6. Possible impact avoidance/mitigation measures ............................ 10 7. Assessing the
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Evaluation
    INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION For Ship-Based Tourism to the Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands and South Orkney Islands October 2007-March 2012 Update August 2008 Multi-Year Document 1 Initial Environmental Evaluation for Ship-Based Tourism to the Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands and South Orkney Islands October 2007 – March 2012 Update August 2008 Multi-Year Document CONTENTS OF IEE 1. CONTACT DETAILS ..................................................................................................... 6 2. NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Ship Operations and Insurance Provisions ............................................ In addition, the M.S. National Geographic Endeavour and National Geographic Explorer will also carry kayaks and a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV). ................ 8 2.2 Description of the Proposed Activity ................................................. 2.3 Alternatives ...................................................................... 2.4 Assessment of Potential Impacts ..................................................... 2.5 Minimization and Mitigation ....................................................... 2.6 Conclusion ....................................................................... 3. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Scope of the Evaluation ............................................................
    [Show full text]