Updated Social Due Diligence Report

August 2018

PAK: Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridor Development Investment Program-Tranche 1

Dara Adamkhel–Peshawar, Section III

Prepared by the Environment, Afforestation, Land and Social (EALS) Wing of the National Highway Authority (NHA) Pakistan for the Asian Development Bank. This is updated version of the Social Due Diligence Report (Draft) posted on ADB website in July 2017 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/48404-003/main#project-documents.

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project. Social DDR

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of 30 Aug 2018)

Currency Unit – Pakistan Rupee/s (PRs) PRs 1.00 = USD $0.8157 USD $1.00 = PRs 122.580

ACRONYM

AD Assistant Director ADB Asian Development Bank DPs Displaced Persons COI Corridor of Impact DD Deputy Director DO (R) District Officer (Revenue) EDO Executive District Officer EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environment Management Plan GM General Manager GOP Government of Pakistan IP Indigenous People Km Kilometer LAA Land Acquisition Act 1894 LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MFF Multi-Tranche Financing Facility NTC National Trade Corridor NGO Non-Governmental Organization NHA National Highway Authority PMU Project Management Unit ROW Right-of-Way SPS Safeguard Policy Statement 2009

This updated Social Due Diligence Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff. In preparing this project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

NHA EALS Page i

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project. Social DDR

TABLE OF CONTENTS CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS ...... i ACRONYM ...... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ...... 2 A. Background ...... 2 B. DDR Objectives and scope ...... 2 C. Methodology...... 3 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 4 A. Project Road Pavement width and Design ...... 4 B. Structures (Cross drainage and Pedestrian under Passes) ...... 5 III. IR IMPACT SCREENING, ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF SOCIAL RISKS ... 6 A. ROW Limits of Project Road Section ...... 6 B. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts...... 6 i. Land Acquisition...... 6 ii. IR impact other than land, ...... 7 C. Impacts on Indigenous People, ...... 8 D. MANAGEMENT OF SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS AND SOCIAL RISKS ...... 8 IV. Consultations, Participation and Information Disclosure ...... 9 A. Stakeholder’s Consultations during project processing phase ...... 9 B. Additional Consultations based on Detailed Design...... 10 V. Institutional Arrangements and Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... 12 A. NHA’s Role and Responsibilities ...... 12 B. Construction Supervision Consultant - Engineer’s Role and Responsibilities .... 13 C. Grievance Redress Mechanism...... 13 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 14 A. Conclusions...... 14 B. Recommendations ...... 14

NHA EALS Page 1

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project. Social DDR

I. INTRODUCTION A. Background 1. The Government of Pakistan (GoP) has emphasized to upgrade and rehabilitate its north- south road network for improved regional connectivity through CAREC transport corridor 5 & 6. Therefore, GoP through Executing Agency “The National Highway Authority (NHA) Pakistan” has agreed to implement CAREC Corridor Development Investment Program (CAREC-CDIP) with financial assistance from ADB through a Multi-tranche Financing Facility (MFF). 2. The PPTA Consultants, engaged by Fig. I: Dara Adamkhel-Peshawar Section ADB in 2016, assisted of Tranche-1 Project, Location Map Government of Pakistan (GOP) to design, prepare and process CAREC MFF and Tranche-01 Project in 2017. Under PPTA, different road sections of N-55 to be upgraded as 4 lane dual carriageway by implementing three different tranche projects under the MFF were selected and feasibility study, preliminary design, technical, financial and safeguards due diligence of the candidate road sections included in Tranche-01 Project was completed. Dara Adamkhel - Peshawar Section (34.45 km) (shown as Section 3 in attached map) is one of the three road section1 being rehabilitated and upgraded as Tranche-01 project through Loan 3574-Pak under the MFF.

3. Following detailed IR and IP impact screening and assessment survey based on preliminary design the PPTA consultants finalized a draft social due diligence report for the project road section to facilitate processing of the MFF and Tranche-01 project. The draft social due diligence report was subject to review and update based on detailed/final design.

B. DDR Objectives and scope 4. Dara Adamkhel-Peshawar road Section (34.35 Km) of N-55 is a 4-lane dual carriageway which will be rehabilitated and improved under Tranche-01. Improvement works for project road section are designed to follow the existing carriageway alignment and pavement width without out tangible involuntary resettlement (IR) impacts. The land acquisition was not involved for this section of the road; however, a detailed social due diligence report was envisaged with the objectives including i) screening and assessment of IR/IP impacts from removal/clearance of encroached assets within carriageway ROW; ii) identification legal or legalizable third party land use rights (if any) in the ROW and affected asset owner encroachers or the squatters; and iii) ascertain resettlement planning documentation requirements. 5. Accordingly at the time of MFF and Tranche-01 processing this social due diligence report was prepared to explain the sub-project, project description & components; assessment of land acquisition, resettlement and social issues (if any); and suggest mitigations/social mitigation plan for potential/unanticipated social issues that may arise during the project implementation. Now, based on detailed design, the subject SDDR has been reviewed and updated by EALS, NHA that

1 Other Two road sections of Tranche-01 project are i) Pataro Sehwan (64-Km) and Ratodero-Shikarpur (43 Km).

NHA EALS Page 2

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project. Social DDR explains likely IR and IP impacts (if any) and confirms project implementation will be consistent with provisions outlined in the RF for the MFF and IR/IP safeguards policies as of ADB’s SPS 2009 and National Legal Framework. C. Methodology 6. Initially the assessment of the land acquisition, IR and social impacts for the project road section followed the preliminary design and a draft SDDR was finalized as one of the project processing documents. Later during design finalization, the methodology adopted for review and assessment of IR impacts included was, i) review of RF for the MFF and ADB’s IR policy requirements as of SPS 2009 and national legal framework for IR impact screening and assessment; ii) review and determination of available ROW limits as of land record and identification of COI for implementing the designed project works in different project road sections; iii) review of ROW/COI ownership status with legal and legalizable third party land use rights (if any); iv) identification and assessment of encroached assets subject to removal in any of the reaches along project road sections; (v) meaning full consultations with EA (NHA), design wing/ experts, land/ revenue officers, contractor/ consultants and local community. 7. Besides keeping close coordination with NHA’s design engineers, regional engineering and land staff and detailed design consultants, pre-structured questionnaires and checklist were used to gather information/data about ROW and COI limits, IR impact screening and assessment as well as consultations (individual interviews and focus group discussions). Collected information/data was computerized and analyzed for assessment of likely IR impacts and presenting in the relevant section below in this DDR. 8. This SDDR provides a crisp update on project description, assessment on land acquisition and IR/IP impacts, consultations, grievance redress mechanism with institutional set-up for management of social safeguards as well as a social mitigation and management plan to address any unanticipated IR impact or social issue during execution of project works.

NHA EALS Page 3

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project. Social DDR

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 9. The existing dual carriageway from Dara Adamkhel to Peshawar (34.5 Km) will be reconstructed and improved as one of the road section under Tranche-1 project of the MFF. The project civil works include rehabilitation/reconstruction and improvement of existing 4-lane carriageway with paved inner/outer shoulders and improved drainage. The all works are designed and adjusted to follow the existing road alignment as per available ROW in different sections. The section below explains prosed design (road formation width and cross-section at different locations and allied works to be implemented. A. Project Road Pavement width and Design 10. Existing Dara Adam Khel – Peshawar section of N-55 is a 4-lane dual carriageway and for overall improvement of this section under the project, existing formation width of the road has been taken as a reference and strictly followed. The road section is near Peshawar city that passes through densely urbanized areas where existing pavement width of two carriageways is 20 meter and above while the ROW varies between 20 m (minimum) to 30 meters (maximum). 11. The proposed rehabilitation and improvement road pavement as per designed specifications with paved shoulders and rehabilitated improved cross drainage structures and road sides damaged drains. Except in urbanized sections mostly at the end point of the project, standard formation width of each carriageway is kept 10.3 meters (7.3 meter carriageway with 2 meters outer and 1 meter inner shoulders) with road side drains (1 meter). In urbanized section near Peshawar outskirts and at end section the project road sides are densely urbanized and available ROW at some locations is only 20 meters only and the formation width in such sections is reduced to 18.6 meters (9 meters wide two carriageways with 0.6 meter wide median). 12. The design indicates that wherever was required and possible, lane widening is incorporated in the design by replacing wide earthen median with New Jersey Barrier and in road sections where space was not available in median, inner and outer shoulders and width of drainage channel along the road is adjusted to avoid resettlement impacts. Nonetheless, width of each carriageway is kept 7.3 meters (each lane will be 3.65 wide). As per design, minimum formation width of 4 lane dual carriageways (two carriageways with 2 lanes each separated by new Jersey barrier or earthen median) at two urbanized locations (Km 0+000 ~ Km 0+500 and Km 27+500 ~ Km 34+250) will be 18.6 meters, while in all other sections it will remain variable between 20 to 30 meters according to the available and designed width of the median and shoulders with drainage structures. The designed cross sections for different sections are summarized in table below and the tender drawings are presented as Annex A. Table 1: Project Road sections with Designed Formation Width. # Section Designed formation width 1 Km 0+000 ~ Km 0+500 & 18.6 meter wide including 9 meter each north and south Km 27+500 ~ Km 34+250 bound carriageways with side drain structure and 0.6 meter median (new jersey barrier) 2 Km 0+500 ~ Km 13+900 20 ~ 24 meter wide including 8.7 ~ 10.7 meter each north and south bound carriageways with 1 meter wide side drain structure and 0.6 meter median (new jersey barrier) 3 Km 13+900 ~ Km 14+050 22.8 meter wide including 10.1 meter each north and south bound carriageways with 1 meter side drain structure and 0.6 meter median (new jersey barrier) 4 Km 14+050 ~ Km 17+400 20.8 ~ 22.8 meter wide including 9.1 ~ 10.1 meter each north and south bound carriageways with 1 meter side drain structure and 0.6 meter median (new jersey barrier) 5 Km 17+400 ~ Km 27+500 30.0 meter wide including 12.8 meter each north and south bound carriageways with 1 meter side drain structure and 1 ~ 3 meter wide median.

NHA EALS Page 4

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project. Social DDR

B. Structures (Cross drainage and Pedestrian under Passes) 13. Besides pavement overlay and improvement works, rehabilitation and improvements in cross drainage facilities are also considered under the project. In total rehabilitation and/or re- construction of 64 cross drainage structures including 17 pipe culverts, 10 slab culverts, 7 bridges, and 30 box culverts have been included in the design. At 23 locations existing cross drainage structures will be replaced with box culverts and at 4 locations existing structures shall be extended. Further, some repair work have been proposed for various cross drainage structure at damaged/ cracked locations and two existing pedestrian underpasses at two locations (Km 17+741 and 19+222) will be rehabilitated. 14. Since the existing formation width is followed and road widening or construction of new structures will also follow available formation width and new road safety facilities (pedestrian under passes or overhead bridges, lane widening or provision of turning bays or additional lanes for slow moving traffic) have not be included in the design. In addition to the designed works explained above, lanes will be marked and road side signage will be provided as per NHA Standards and requirements. The National Highway and Motorway Police will be deployed for improved traffic operations and enhanced road safety.

NHA EALS Page 5

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

III. IR IMPACT SCREENING, ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF SOCIAL RISKS 15. IR impact screening and assessment for the project road section was initially conducted based on preliminary design at project feasibility study stage following IR screening and assessment criteria and checklists provided in the RF for the MFF. Information about available ROW in different sections was gathered and compiled to determine land acquisition requirements and based on preliminary design, IR impacts were reviewed and assessed through field surveys conducted by the PPTA resettlement specialists and a Social Due Diligence Report (draft) confirming no IR impacts was finalized and disclosed in 2017. 16. The land acquisition requirements and IR impacts are again reviewed and assessed based on detailed design prepared by the NESPAK for updating of the SDDR before award of civil works contract as required under the RF provisions. The ROW record of project road section and details were reviewed and compared with the cross sections drawings provided by the detailed design consultants and field surveys were conducted to enumerate the IR related impacts (if any) that can emerge during execution of project works and update the Social Due Diligence Report accordingly. The IR/IP Screening and assessment was done by using IR/IP impact screening checklists presented as Annex-B during field survey conducted between 7-11 August 2018 and impact assessment findings are summarized below. A. ROW Limits of Project Road Section 17. The start of the subproject (km 0+000) is at chainage 1228+000 (Bara Bridge) and the end of the subproject (km 34+350) is at Chainage 1197+650 (Abbas Chowk). The total length of the proposed road section is 34+350 km. The ROW record available with maintenance units and land officers of regional office of NHA was gathered and reviewed to determine additional land requirements for implementing project road works as per cross-section provided by the detailed design consultants for different sections. The ROW details for different sections are presented in Table 2 below: Table 2: ROW of Dara Adamkhel- Peshawar Road Section Main Locations Chainage Right of Way (ROW)

- Abbas Chowk - Spin Taran - 1187+000 to 1197+650 - 21 m (10.5 m each side) - Mattani - Mattani Bypass - 1202+000to 1211+000 - 30 m (15 m each side) - 27 meters (13.5 m - Mattani Bypass - Mashogagar - 1211+000 to 1212+000 each side) - Badaber Mariamzai - 1212+000 to 1216+000 - 26 m (13 m each side) - Badaber Horrizai - 1216+000 to 1218+000 - 26 m (13 m on each side) - 21 m (10.1 m on right side; - Badaber Police Station - 1218+000 to 1220+000 - 10.9 m on left - Roshan Kababi/ People Masjid - 1220+000 to 1222+000 - 20 m (10 m each side) - Shiekh Muhammadi/ Syphon Chowk - 1222+000 to 1223+000 - 21 m (10.9 m each side) - Utmanzai - 1223+000 to 1224+000 - 23.16 m (11.8 m each side) - Alizai/ Kagawala - Sceme Chowk - 1224+000 to1225+000 - 26 m (13 m each side) - Scheme Chowk - Bara Bridge - 1225+000 to1228+000 - 26 m (13 m each side)

B. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts. i. Land Acquisition. 18. Record confirmed that the ROW width is not consistent throughout the project road section and ROW width varied from 20 meter to 30 meters for different stretches. So to determine the land acquisition requirements the designed cross-sections for execution of works in different sections are compared with the available ROW width and it is confirmed that all works will be executed within available ROW limits and acquisition of additional ROW land is not required in the

NHA EALS Page 6

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR project road sections. Table 3 below represent comparative analysis of the road cross-sections and available ROW widths validates that the design is adjusted as per available ROW and execution of project works will not entail additional acquisition of land. Table 3:The designed Cross-section with corresponding ROW width Sections Road Sections Designed Cross Road Chainage Right of Way (ROW) from-to Section width Km 27+500 ~ 18.6 m Km 1187+000 ~ 21 m (10.5 m each side) Km 34+250 Km 1197+650 KM 17+400 ~ 30.0 m Km 1202+000 ~ 30 m (15 m each side) Km 27+500 Km 1211+000 Km 0+500 ~ 20-24 m Km 1211+000 ~ Km 17+400 Km 1228+000 Varies between 20 meter

(10 m each side) and 26 Km 0+000 ~ Km 18.6 Km 1225+000 ~ meter (13 m each side) 0+500 Km1228+000

ii. IR impact other than land, 19. The Initial likely IR impacts related to removal of encroached assets from the ROW were reviewed and assessed based on preliminary design and the Social Due Diligence Report (draft) prepared in 2017 confirmed that the ROW limits required for execution of project works are not encroached or encumbered and implementation of project works in this road section will not cause any IR related impacts. The LARF provisions and finding of the SDDR (draft) were considered during detailed design for avoiding land acquisition and ensuring avoidance of IR impacts other than land. 20. Following completion of detailed design, entire project road section was again surveyed from 7-11 August, 2018 and IR impacts other than land were screened and assessed by using the screening checklists as provided in the LARF. This impact screening and survey confirmed that the ROW limits required for the project is not encroached with any type of temporary or permanent fixed structure/assets and it is available for construction activities free from encumbrances. However, some mobile vendors (hand push or motorized cart vendors) who come and travel along the road through settlement to sell their edible or other daily use items can be seen. Such mobile vendors come in the morning with their carts and sellable items, keep moving from place to place and after selling their items return back to their places in nearby settlements and on adverse IR impacts are conceived on such mobile vendors. Main findings of impact assessment survey are summarized below. • The rehabilitation of the road section Dara Adamkhel-Peshawar will not require acquisition of land as the ROW has already been acquired by NHA. • The NHA field maintenance staff has effectively managed the Row for Traffic operations and safety and a continuous watch and ward is implemented to avoid encroachments along the pavement width. • The road pavement width and design is adjusted as per ROW availability in different road sections and particularly in built up areas the pavement width is kept 18.6 meters to avoid IR impacts. • The ROW land required for designed pavement width including earthen shoulders and road side drains is free from encumbrances and is adequate for implementing designed improvement works for 4-lane highway. • Additional road safety facilities like provision of turning bays or additional lane for slow moving traffic or to construct new under passes or overhead pedestrian bridges that may

NHA EALS Page 7

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

require addition land beyond ROW limits are not included in the detailed design. Wherever lane widening was necessary, the existing earthen median is replaced with New Jersey barrier or its width is reduced to avoid acquisition of land and IR impacts on the adjoining land properties. C. Impacts on Indigenous People, 21. The project road section traverses through the main stream Pashtun population of Kyber Pakhtun Khwa. The IR screening and assessment checklists were used to identify and determine impacts on the indigenous people. The screening exercise confirmed that the people or ethnic groups having their socio-economic institutions different from main stream population or has collective attachment to their ancestral land and resources are not present along the project road corridor. 22. Based on assessment, it is confirmed that the ROW is adequate and land acquisition and resettlement are unlikely from designed rehabilitation work of 4-lane carriageway. However, to ensure avoiding accidental damage or loss of adjoining private properties and addressing social risks during execution of subproject works a plan for management and mitigation of social risks is presented in section below. D. MANAGEMENT OF SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS AND SOCIAL RISKS 23. Although IR screening and assessment confirmed that the IR and IP impacts are unlikely, however, some unanticipated construction related socioeconomic impacts and risks could emerge during on execution of onsite construction activities are operation of the construction machinery and transport. Construction and operation related likely impacts have been anticipated and social impacts and risk management plan is prepared for timely documentation and redress of these impacts. Some of the likely socioeconomic impacts and risks are: • Conflicts due to temporary land lease by the contractor for camp, workshop, plants, material extraction; • Disruption of traffic flow; and conflicts between local community and construction workers; • Accidental damage to adjoining private assets (structures and crops etc.). • Other Social issues risks related to child labor, gender issues or spread of STDs etc. 24. Albeit above highlighted social impacts and risks are covered and addressed in the relevant environmental management plan (EMP) prepared for the road improvements works, however, this SDDR also included a matrix attached as Annex C for management of social impacts and risks that could emerge during execution of project works.

NHA EALS Page 8

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

IV. Consultations, Participation and Information Disclosure 25. Consultations, participation and information disclosure is an integral part of social safeguards impacts screening and assessment, planning, design and preparation of required social safeguards documents including SDDRs and RPs at project design stage as well as during management and monitoring of social safeguards throughout project execution. Accordingly for preparation of SDDR based on preliminary design the consultations were carried with all stakeholders including project designers, implementer and the local communities. Later on during updating of SDDR after completing detailed design additional consultations were carried out to explain the project design, record community concerns and incorporate appropriate measures to mitigate and address the concerns raised by the community. The sections below summarized the consultations findings. A. Stakeholder’s Consultations during project processing phase 26. During the initial field surveys at project processing stage in 2016 and 2017, the consultations were focused on sharing project related information with the relevant stakeholders including respective Deputy Directors of Maintenance (NHA) and the local communities to explore the rehabilitation and improvement requirements and prepare preliminary design and safeguards planning due diligence documents. The stakeholder’s consultations were conducted by the PPTA survey team in compliance with the consultation and participation guidelines in Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards: A Planning and Implementation Good Practice Sourcebook 2 . Consultations were carried out to learn, analyze and assimilate the views and concerns of the public on the proposed interventions. The main objectives of the consultation were to: • Share information with stakeholders on the proposed interventions and the expected impact on the socio-economic environment of the project corridor; • Understand stakeholder’s concerns regarding various aspects of the project, including the existing condition of the road, upgrading requirements, and the likely impact of construction-related activities and operation, on the community; • Discuss with stakeholders their concerns regarding the project impact and mitigation measures suggested by them; and, • Address stakeholder’s concerns with regard to socioeconomic impacts in the project designs and construction management strategies. 27. At project processing phase, four focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with local community in November 2016, wherein 22 roadside community members and other local community participated to highlight their concerns and design adjustments to be considered to avoid damage to their assets and properties along the road side. Of the 4 sessions, 2 were with males and 2 were with female members of the community. The list of the participants of earlier consultations is attached as Annex-D. 28. In addition to these, official consultations were also held with NHA officials in order to obtain their views on social impact management and to incorporate design measures to address the concerns of local community. The community concerns/ requests which were within the purview of the Project were discussed with the design team and the safety concerns have been taken up for consideration. Provision of traffic calming measures has been considered by NHA as a road safety

2ADB. 2009. Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards: A Planning and Implementation Good Practice Sourcebook – Draft Working Document

NHA EALS Page 9

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR measure. A clear demarcation of ROW has been discussed with the Maintenance Section of NHA, and has been presented as recommendations to be taken care off. B. Additional Consultations based on Detailed Design 29. A round of additional consultations with all relevant stakeholders were carried out as part of updating the Social Due Diligence Report (SDDR) based on the final design (tender drawings)/ and alignment provided by the General Manager (Planning). After review of design, the NHA zonal office was visited on 8th August 2018 and consultations were held with the Zonal Member and regional NHA office as well as respective maintenance units and zonal land staff to review, discuss and confirmation of available ROW limits and expected IR impacts and requirements. 30. Meanwhile, following final design/ alignment, fresh consultations were also carried out along the project road sections. Such consultations included communication with individuals during IR impact screening and assessment survey and structured focus group discussions held at 4 locations on August 10, 2018. In focus group discussions, 21 persons from local community participated (participant list is Annex-E). The local community who participated in individual meetings and FGD includes business man/shop owners, school teachers, tribes elders, labour, social workers, drivers, passengers and well as other general public located along the proposed road section. The Local community welcomed to the improvement of project road section and showed their commitment to extend cooperation and support for the successful and timely completion of the project community. However some concerns were also raised for making appropriate adjustments in design and during execution of project works. Following are the major concerns that were raised by the community during consultations. • Proper drainage, signage/ signboards, bus stops/ waiting sheds, U-turns nearby settlements will need to be provided on priority basis as requested by the community/ local population; • Road accidents/ traffic blockage particularly near Abbas Chowk will need to be reduced through the installation of road signals, signboards and fixing of speed limit. • Local people may be involved during the construction activities/ works, so that this will be the value addition in the livelihood of local people. • The mobile vendors located in the stretch of last 6 km (onward Bhudabeer to scheme chowk) should be informed well before start of construction activity to facilitate them to move their mobile structures from the ROW. 31. The project design including road formation width and drainage facilities provided were explained and the road safety measures like marking of traffic lanes, provision of u turns and installation of road side signage were highlighted during consultations. The participants were clarified on measures proposed for improved traffic movement, enforcement of speed limits for different road sections and improved road safety. The Table 4 below presents the summary of concerns raised and redressed in the design with actions required in remarks column. , Table 4: Community Concerns and their Redress Concerns Redress Remarks • Inadequate drainage for local • The engineering design included • The Engineer will ensure community/ settlements rehabilitation of damaged/effected construction of designed located along proposed road drainage system especially near number of cross drainage section. settlements. structures and review the requirements for further improving drainage facilities.

NHA EALS Page 10

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Concerns Redress Remarks • Accidents and road blockage • Signage/ signboards, speed limits • Engineer will ensure frequency at selected and U-turns are included in the installation of signage while locations including Shuhda design and will be provided at NHA will deploy the National chowk and nearby appropriate locations Highway and Motor Police for settlements. • Bus stops/ waiting sheds will be enforcing highway rules and considered nearby the speed limits to reduce the settlements at prominent incidence of accidents. locations. • There are number of mobile • Before start of construction at any • The works execution time lines vendors (hand carts, site, the mobile vendors will be will be communicated formally temporary shed etc.) having informed well before mobilizing and informally by the PIU their businesses within the machinery to facilitate them for safeguards team and the limit of ROW especially at last timely removing of their push consultants. The bill boards 6 km (i.e. onward carts away from construction site. displaying timelines for start of Bhudabeer). construction at some particular section will be displayed and announcement shall be made through loud speakers. • Involvement of outsiders • the civil works contract include The Engineer will ensure and (skilled/unskilled labour) in provisions to engage local monitor that adequate number of the project related jobs may communities. local people are engaged on lead towards less friendly project works. environment in the project area.

NHA EALS Page 11

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

V. Institutional Arrangements and Grievance Redress Mechanism 32. NHA has established a section to cater for issues related with environment, afforestation, land and social (EALS) headed by the GM (EALS). GM (EALS) is further assisted by 2 Directors, i.e. Director, Environment & Afforestation [E&A] and Director, Land and Social [L&S]. Director (L&S) is further supported by Deputy Director (Land) and Deputy Director (Social). The Deputy Directors are assisted by respective Assistant Directors. 33. Moreover, for the purpose of MFF, additional posts of a Director Resettlement with two Deputy Directors for Resettlement and one for Grievance Redress Mechanism with their support teams were provided in the approved PC-I of the Tarnche-01 project under the MFF. While at subproject level, the PIUs headed by a project director will be in put in place that will be supported by the resettlement specialist (s) mobilized through construction supervision consultants. The Resettlement Specialist (s) of the supervision team will assist PIU for assessment of the likely social impacts and monitor the social management activities during execution of the project works. A. NHA’s Role and Responsibilities 34. The Project will be implemented through the coordination of General Manager (Aided Projects), who will be responsible for overall project management and the progress relating the safeguards will be shared with EALS for review and seeking guidance on the potential social issues identified during course of subproject implementation. 35. The Director (Resettlement) instituted within the EALS will assist to carry out a range of activities including implementing and monitoring the safeguards documents of the project. The Resettlement Specialist mobilized by the supervision consultants and will be responsible for carrying out the activities including preparation/ updating/ finalizing the safeguard documents, i.e. social due diligence report, corrective action plan, LARPs, IPP (if any), consent & broad community support (if any). 36. The key responsibilities of EALS are: • Provide oversight/orientation regarding preparation/ updating, implementation and monitoring of safeguard documents of the proposed subproject; • Prepare/ update required safeguard documents, i.e. Social Due Diligence Report and others (if any required, LARP, IPP, CAP, C&BCS) etc. for the proposed road section; • Ensure compliance with the requirements of the LARF, ADB’s Social Policy Statement (2009), and Land Acquisition Act 1894; • Establish grievance redress mechanism including notification of Grievance Redress Committee (GRC); • Ensure the disclosure of approved safeguard documents on NHA website and translation of executive summary in local language (Urdu/ Pashto) for disclosure to DPs/ local community (if any); • Establish a system for both internal and external monitoring of social safeguard documents implementation and set out the M&E indicators in accordance with the LARF, and SPS 2009; • Coordinate in land acquisition process and resettlement planning activities for the proposed subproject (if any).

NHA EALS Page 12

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

B. Construction Supervision Consultant - Engineer’s Role and Responsibilities 37. The Supervision Consultant will act as “the Engineer” on contract and will be responsible for contract administration and construction supervision. Through a social/ resettlement monitoring specialist (intermittent input), the Supervision Consultant will ensure daily/ weekly monitoring of the implementation of social and environmental impact management measures by the Contractor and accordingly prepare monthly progress report to be submitted to the Project Director and GM (EALS). C. Grievance Redress Mechanism 38. A project based grievance redress mechanism (GRM) will be established to provide an effective and systematic mechanism at subproject level for responding to complaints/ queries from the local community along the alignment/ general public. The available setup of GRM will be informed to the local community/ general public to register/ enter their grievances for their resolution in a timely manner. 39. The GRM will have a two-tiered structure at the subproject level and another third tier at the executing agency level, enabling immediate local responses to grievances and higher-level review addressing more difficult cases not resolved at the local level. An effective and efficient GRM is being in placed in the office of PIU through establishing a grievance redress committee (GRC). In addition, the grievance redress mechanism will follow the procedures outlined in MFF LARF. For effective management of grievances, following mechanism for grievances flow and time lines will be followed throughout project execution period. Grievance Redress Flow Mechanism with Timeframe

Complaints by individuals, groups or Institutions Time may vary depending on point of entry Parliamentarians, community EA, other Public Offices/ or religious leaders institutions or ADB

Within 5 days of receipt of complaint. GRC focal person, Complaint recorded in register and acknowledged

Within 30 days (15 days GRC’s review and fact finding for fact finding and 15 completed, for GRC to meet and GRC meeting convened and conclude) solution arrived

Within 30 days of Solution agreed, sent Solution agreed, sent Solution disagreed, receipt of complaint. to project team for to third party for DP clarified on legal implementation implementation course.

Grievance addressed and closed and if complainant does not revert back.

NHA EALS Page 13

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Conclusions 40. Based on updated IR screening and assessment after completing detailed design, it is concluded that the project civil works have been curtailed within available ROW limits thorough site specific design solutions. Execution of the project works will not require additional land beyond ROW limits and neither encroached assets are identified nor IR relate impacts were documented. Moreover, the consultations confirmed that the local community/ general public is pleased with the proposed improvement works design measures included to improve drainage structures and road safety through lane marking, traffic signage and enforcement of traffic laws etc. 41. Therefore. It is concluded that the road rehabilitation and improvement works will not cause any LAR impacts including asset loss or impaired livelihood and income sources of the local community. However, some unanticipated impacts can emerge during execution of civil works for which a Social impact and risk management plan is prepared to address any untoward situation faced during project execution. Accordingly the Social Due Diligence Report is updated with recommendations below. B. Recommendations 42. The IR screening and assessment based on detailed design validated that project works will not involve LAR impacts, however, to address any unanticipated impact or resolve construction related social ricks , the following recommendations are made to ensure smooth execution of work. • Consultation with communities and nearby households will be held on regular basis at all stages for information dissemination, record community concerns and prompt resolution of the concerns in the purview of GRM provided in the LARF. • The best engineering practices will be ensured to avoid unanticipated IR impacts that could emerge at detailed design stage; • NHA with support from Construction Supervision Consultant will monitor temporary land occupation by contractor for borrow materials and establishing his facilities like camp sites, stack piling yards and Asphalt/Batching plants etc. The Construction Contractor will sign agreements with the land owners for use of such lands and after completion of civil works the lands taken for temporary use will be restored to their original conditions by Construction Contractor and rent fees shall be fully paid to the owners of those land plots in accordance with the agreed terms and conditions. • Due to high traffic density on improved 4-land dual carriageway, permanent encroachments are unlikely beyond the drain at ROW edge on either side of the road. However, the mobile vendors i.e. push cart vendors can cause interruption in traffic flow if not regulated are can be vulnerable to accidental damage due to construction machinery working nearby. Hence it is recommended to advise the mobile vendors to move their push carts at safer places well before construction activity is started. • If unanticipated IR impacts emerge during execution of project works are due to restriction of access to assets from contractor’s activities, it will be immediately reported to the supervision consultant and civil works at site will be stopped until the issues is resolved amicably or a corrective action plan (if needed) is prepared in consultation with ADB safeguards team. Nonetheless in such sections the project works will be kept on hold till ADB cleared CAP is implemented and confirmed as such.

NHA EALS Page 14

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

PHOTOLOG

NHA EALS Page 15

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

PICTORIAL PRESENTATION

Plate 1: Consultative meeting with GM (Maintenance, Plate 2: Consultative meeting with Dy Director KP) and concerned officials, NHA Zonal Office, (Maintenance, KP) and Inspector at NHA Zonal Office, Peshawar. Peshawar.

Plate 3: Consultative meeting with Director (Land & Plate 4: A view of Dara Adam Khel Model School Social) and Assistant Director (L&S), NHA, Peshawar. along the road alignment.

Plate 5: Consultative meeting with female community Plate 6: Consultative meeting with Principal/ owner of a members in a school along the proposed road section. school located along the road alignment.

NHA EALS Page 16

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Plate 7: Proposed road section starting point (Dara Plate 8: Proposed road section starting point (Shuhada Adam Khel). Chowk), Dara Adam Khel.

Plate 9: Consultation with community along the alignment Plate 10: Consultation with community along the (Sher Alam Village). alignment, Mani Khel, Abbas Chowk.

Plate 11: Inadequate drainage along the alignment as Plate 12: Heavy flood occurred on the road from hilly indicated by the local community near Sher Alam village. terrain during rainfall. As a result, existing road fully remains under water.

NHA EALS Page 17

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Plate 13: Consultation with local people who had their animal Plate 14: Road alignment along with poultry shed shed along the road near Bhudabeer. (temporary shed) within ROW near Bhudabeer.

Plate 15: Consultation with shop owners along the Plate 16: A view of road alignment/ ROW passes through proposed road alignment nearby Bhudabeer. Zangali..

Plate 17: Mobile vendors (hand carts, tents/ sheds located within the ROW of the proposed raod section Plate 18: A view of Mosque located along the road particularly at the end reaches/ changes of the road. alignment.

NHA EALS Page 18

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Plate 20: Proposed road section at Scheme Chowk Plate 19: A temporary hotel shed within the ROW, which indicates the ending point. will need to be shifted/ moved little behind from the existing location..

Plate 21: Nullah located at the ending stretch of the Plate 22: A view of end point of the road section (Dara proposed road section. Adam Khel to Peshawar).

NHA EALS Page 19

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

ANNEXES

NHA EALS Page 20

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Annex-A: Proposed Road Cross Section at Different Chainages

NHA EALS Page 21

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

NHA EALS Page 22

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

NHA EALS Page 23

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

NHA EALS Page 24

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

NHA EALS Page 25

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Annex-B: IR and IP Screening Checklist IR screening check lists Investment Component: District: Dera Adamkhel-Peshawar road section of Tranche-1 (N-55) Peshawar. Potential for Involuntary Resettlement Not Yes No. If yes, consider potential Effects* Known scope of resettlement effects Will the project include any new physical V No acquisition of private land is construction work? required and physical works will be within the existing pavement width and will not cause any IR impacts. Does the project include widening of the V highway? Are any environmental effects likely which V may lead to loss of housing, other assets, resource use or incomes? Is land acquisition likely to be necessary? V Is the site for land acquisition known? N/A Is the ownership status and current usage of N/A Land belongs to NHA the land known? Are non-titled people present on the site/ V within the corridor of Impact? Will there be loss of housing? V Will there be loss of crops, trees, and other V fixed assets through land use related changes? Will there be loss of incomes and livelihoods? V Will people lose access to facilities, services, V or natural resources through land use-related changes? Will any social or economic activities be V affected through land use-related changes? Affected Persons and Severity of Impacts Any estimate of the likely number of those affected by the project? No () Yes () Not Applicable Any estimate of the severity of impact at the household level? None If yes, what? Any of these people poor, indigenous, or vulnerable to poverty risks? No (* ) Yes ( ) If yes, how?

Indigenous People (IP) Screening Checklist No. Key Concern Yes No Not Remarks Known (Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column) A. Screening for presence/absence of Indigenous Peoples 1 Are there socio-cultural groups present in or use the project V area who may be considered as "tribes" (hill tribes, schedules tribes, tribal peoples), minorities (ethnic or national minorities), or indigenous communities in the project area? 2 Are there national or local laws or policies as well as V anthropological researches/studies that consider these groups presenting or using the project area as belonging to ‘ethnic minorities’, scheduled tribes, tribal peoples, national minorities, or cultural communities? 3 Do such groups self-identify as being part of a distinct social V and cultural group? 4 Do such groups maintain collective attachments to distinct V

NHA EALS Page 26

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

No. Key Concern Yes No Not Remarks Known habitats or ancestral territories and/or to the natural resources in these habitats and territories? 5 Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social, and V political institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture? 6 Do such groups speak a distinct language or dialect? V 7 Has such groups been historically, socially and economically V marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated against? 8 Are such groups represented as “Indigenous Peoples” or as V "ethnic minorities" or "scheduled tribes" or "tribal populations" in any formal decision- making bodies at the national or local levels? Overall assessment: IP present in project area B. Identification of Potential Impacts 9 Will the project directly or indirectly benefit or target V Indigenous Peoples? 10 Will the project directly or indirectly affect Indigenous V Peoples' traditional socio-cultural and belief practices? (e.g. child-rearing ,health, education, arts, and governance) 11 Will the project affect the livelihood systems of Indigenous V Peoples? (e.g., food production system, natural resource management, crafts and trade, employment status) 12 Will the project be in an area (land or territory) occupied, V owned, or used by Indigenous Peoples, and/or claimed as ancestral domain? Assessment of Impact Categorization (Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column) C. Identification of Special Requirements: Will the project activities include: No. Key Concern Yes No Not Remarks Known 13 Commercial development of the cultural resources and V knowledge of Indigenous Peoples? 14 Physical displacement from traditional or customary lands? V 15 Commercial development of natural resources (such as V minerals, hydrocarbons, forests, water, hunting or fishing grounds) within customary lands under use that would impact the livelihoods or the cultural, ceremonial, spiritual uses that define the identity and community of Indigenous Peoples? 16 Establishing legal recognition of rights to lands and V territories that are traditionally owed or customarily used, occupied or claimed by indigenous peoples? 17 Acquisition of lands that are traditionally owned or V customarily used occupied or claimed by indigenous peoples? 18 Is Consent and Broad Community Support (C&BCS) required? V

NHA EALS Page 27

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Annex-C Management of Construction Related Social Impacts and Risks Social Impacts/ Risk Mitigation Responsibility Stage I. Temporary Occupation of Land Land required for establishing The contractor will directly lease required land form Contractor/ Pre- contractor’s facilities including the respective land owners to establish his facilities Engineer Construction camp, workshop, plants, material and shall present signed lease agreement to the extraction will be acquired Engineer and NHA before start of establishing his directly from private landowners facilities. by the contractor. The provisions Contractor’s facilities, viz., construction camp and of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 workshop as well as batching and asphalt plants will will not be invoked, as the be located at a minimum distance from nearby urban acquisition of the land will be settlement as specified in the respective EMP. temporary and will be covered by For material extraction and waste disposal, barren land Contractor / Pre- short–term lease agreements i.e. areas not under agricultural, residential or Engineer Construction between the landowners and forestation use will be preferred and the contractors under the approval of agricultural/residential or commercial land types will the Project Engineer. Rental terms be avoided to the extent possible; Where the use of will have to be negotiated to the agricultural land is unavoidable for earth material, the satisfaction of the landowners top 30 cm of soil will be stripped and stockpiled for concerned. Disposal of and excess redressing the land after the required material has been spoil will require approved removed. locations. In case deep ditching is carried out, the top 1 m layer of the ditching will be stripped and stockpiled. The ditch will initially be lined with impermeable layer/material and filled with scrap material from construction then leveled with the stockpiled topsoil to make it even with the rest of the area. It shall be ensured that the scrap does not contain any toxic or harmful material that may produce material that would contaminate soil or water resources. Supervising Consultant (Engineer) and the project Engineer/PD, NHA Construction staff of the NHA and will monitor and ensure that landowners are compensated according to the terms of the lease agreements, and the restoration actions agreed upon by the contractors as per the terms of the construction contracts are duly carried out. Photo– documentation of the existing land prior to temporarily acquisition should be carried out, which will be used to resolve any restoration conflicts between the landowner and contractor. II. Increased risk of accidents caused by partial closure of road during rehabilitation works During construction activities, Proper site specific measures will be carried out in Contractor/ Construction traffic flow will be disturbed. In consultation with the Engineer to ensure the safety of Engineer road sections passing through population residing along and around the project populated areas, there will be corridor. Site specific Traffic Management Plans limited scope for providing (TMPs) will be prepared and implemented by the diversion tracks for the mobility Contractor with the approval of the Engineer. of local and thorough traffic that Alternative routes will be identified and relevant will increase the risk of accidents. authorities will be consulted in the use of these roads. During the operation stage NHA will make NHA Maintenance Operation arrangements for proper maintenance and operation of Section the proposed Intervention. Periodic inspections will be made to identify the problem areas and remedial measures. For this purpose the maintenance unit/agency should be fully equipped with contingency plans in case of any emergency / natural disaster. III. Problems to Health and Safety of Labor and Employees on Construction Work and Provision of Safety Equipment to Workers on Site.

NHA EALS Page 28

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Social Impacts/ Risk Mitigation Responsibility Stage Occurrence of accidents / • Complying with the safety precautions for Contractor/ Construction incidents during the construction construction workers as per relevant provisions Engineer activities, particularly from of civil work contracts, national laws and excavation activities is common. International Labor Organization (ILO) The workers and general public Convention No. 62, as far as applicable to the residing along the project corridor project contract. or near the work sites will • Occupational Health and safety measures will be particularly be at risk. ensured and construction workers will be trained on safety procedures, social awareness and use of Occupational Protective equipment OPE. The OPE for construction workers including safety boots, helmets, gloves, and protective masks, will be made available at all sites and their uses will be monitored and reported in periodic environmental monitoring reports on regular basis.. Injuries to Construction workers Contractor will ensure the provision of adequate health Contractor/ Construction facilities and medicines, first aid kits, vehicle, etc. at Engineer the camp site. IV. Gender Issues The induction of outside labor The Contractor will take due care to apprise the Contractor/ Construction may create social and gender workers of the traditions and customs of the local Engineer issues due to ignorance of local community and ensure strict observance of sanctity of customs and norms. It may also local customs and traditions. Contractor will warn the cause hindrance to the mobility of staff strictly not to involve in any un–ethical activities local women for their daily and to obey the local norms and cultural restrictions activities including working in the particularly with reference to women. The EMP will field, herding livestock, gathering include detailed measures to avoid such issues. fuel wood, etc. During construction activities, if privacy of the nearby Contractor/ Construction households will be affected, the Contractor will inform Engineer the house owner to make prior arrangements. Similarly, Contractor will ensure, as much as possible, that the construction activities should not affect the privacy particularly with reference to women. V. Social Conflicts and Employment of Locals on the Project The presence of outside Good relations with the local communities will be Contractor/ Construction construction workers may cause promoted by encouraging Contractor to provide Engineer some degree of social disruption opportunities for skilled and unskilled employment to and even active disputes with the the locals, as well as on-the-job training in local community as a result of construction for young people from the area. social / cultural differences. Contractor will restrain his permanent staff from mixing with the locals to avoid any social problems. VI. Use of Local Water Supplies and Other Common Resources Local water supplies will be The contractor will explore the use of alternative water Contractor/ Construction required to meet campsite and resource so that the existing community water Engineer construction requirements, resources are not impacted. No existing water source bringing its use into competition used by the local community will be exploited by the with the use by the local Contractor for campsite facilities as well as communities. construction purposes. Local water may be affected due Availability of water for campsite facilities and Contractor / Construction to implementation of project both construction purposes will be ensured by the Engineer / Local in quantity as well as quality. Contractor prior to start of construction activities. As Govt. per Local Government Act, the contractor will seek approval from the local government for use of the water resources. The Contractor will be required to maintain close Contractor Construction liaison with local communities to ensure that any potential conflicts related to common resource utilization for project purposes are resolved quickly. The contractor will prepare guidelines for the workers Contractor Construction for minimizing the wastage of water during construction activities and at campsites.

NHA EALS Page 29

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Social Impacts/ Risk Mitigation Responsibility Stage Possibility of Spread of STDs Contractor to arrange HIV / AIDS awareness programs Contractor Construction including HIV / AIDS amongst in the field camps on regular basis by a qualified the project labor and local expert. population The Contractor will ensure initial and regular medical Contractor Construction check–up of the camp staff from a qualified doctor. Any person found affected with any of the sexually transmittal diseases will be immediately shifted from the camp to the hospital for detailed check–up and treatment. The cost will be borne by the Contractor. Contractor will restrict his permanent staff from Contractor Construction mixing with the locals to avoid any social and health problems. Restoration of construction and The Contractor will ensure the restoration and Contractor Post camp sites. rehabilitation of construction and camp sites on Construction completion of the project. NHA should carry out tree plantation along the road. NHA Post Construction VII. Restricted Mobility and Damage to Properties During the construction phase the The contractor will ensure that the mobility of the local Contractor/ Construction general mobility of the local communities and their livestock is not hindered by the Engineer residents and their livestock in construction activities. The contractor will provide and around the project area is crossing points at the road at appropriate places to likely to be hindered. Likewise facilitate the people for going across the road for their access to the natural resource may daily work and access to the natural resources. be affected. This particularly impacts women and children.

During construction structures of Contractor will arrange immediate repair and Contractor/ Construction road side dwellers and crops may compensation as specified in the tender documents. Engineer be damaged. Further, the mobility The practice of displaying/selling wares at the edge of NHA Operation of structures which are used for the ROW should be discouraged for safety reasons as display/selling of wares during it may limit mobility along the road. day time along the road could be restricted if not managed properly. . Construction activities, Generally, the contractor will avoid using the rural Contractor/ Construction particularly excavation and roads for hauling the construction material. However, Engineer movement of haulage trucks and if it is unavoidable, the existing roads will be widened, machinery may disrupt the overlaid with shingle or surface treated to existing tracks leading from the accommodate local as well as contractors traffic under main road to settlements. This the approval of the Engineer. Damages to local roads will limit the accessibility of the used by the Contractor will be repaired at the local population to the main road. Contractor’s expense.

NHA EALS Page 30

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Annex D: Stakeholder’s Consultation Record List of Local participants in FGD meetings held in 2016 Date Location/ CNIC Contact Name of Main Views /Concerns Venue Details Participants Consultation

0346902 Mr. Muhammad Views of the 2 Nov, 2016 Bazi Khel 17301-136288- 2386 Imran participants were positive towards the 0301832 2 Nov, 2016 Bazi Khel 14301-3687208- Mr. Sajjad Ali improvement activities 0858 of the road section. 0306575 2 Nov, 2016 Bazi Khel 17301-68995-7 Mr. Abdullah They opined that safety 6430 should be ensured with 0313737 speed breakers. 1 2 Nov, 2016 Bazi Khel 17301-9050157-7 Mr. Kalim Khan 6337 They were willing to support the project for 0322911 2 Nov, 2016 Bazi Khel 173017289520-5 Mr. Sadaqatullah road improvement. 8556 A further request was 0306832 Mr. Muhammad 2 Nov, 2016 Bazi Khel 17301-0644662-3 for the provision of a 5812 Asif service road. 0322911 2 Nov, 2016 Bazi Khel 17301-7289520-5 Mr. Bahada Khan 8556 Scheme 0345- The response was 4 Nov, 2016 17301-6746405-1 Mr. Bahada Khan Chowk 9655761 positive towards the road rehabilitation. Scheme 0345- Mr. Amanullah 4 Nov, 2016 17301-24857223-3 Chowk 9655761 Khan The respondents were of the view that clearly Scheme 0307- Mr. Muhammad 4 Nov, 2016 17301- 7321310-1 visible demarcation of Chowk 8460816 Sadaqat ROW would assist them Scheme 0313645 in keeping their 4 Nov, 2016 17301- 4202706-5 Mr. Adnan Khan Chowk 4531 structures out of the ROW. Scheme 0314- 4 Nov, 2016 17301- 8856790-3 Mr. Bilal They also mentioned Chowk 5957100 that notices issued by Scheme 0345- NHA was an 2 4 Nov, 2016 17301- 2610478-3 Mr. Kalimullah Chowk 9201483 inconvenience when Scheme 0345965 they had built structures 4 Nov, 2016 17301- 2458722-3 Mr. Amanullah without knowing they Chowk 5761 were encroaching into Scheme 0307- the ROW. 4 Nov, 2016 17301- 73213101 Mr. Niamat Khan Chowk 8460816 Scheme 0313645 4 Nov, 2016 17301-4202706-5 Mr. Abduljabbar Chowk 4531 Scheme 0314- 4 Nov, 2016 17302- 8856790-3 Mr. Sher Baz Chowk 5957100 Scheme 0345- 4 Nov, 2016 17301- 2610478-3 Mr. Waris Khan Chowk 9201483

NHA EALS Page 31

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Date Location/ CNIC Contact Name of Main Views /Concerns Venue Details Participants Consultation

The female respondents stated that they were 6 Nov, 2016 Bazikhel 17301- 26823816 - Ms. Zarmina Bibi happy with the proposed project. The respondents requested that schools and mosques should be close to the roads. 6 Nov, 2016 Bazikhel 17101- 19485239 - Ms. Sabar Sultan They requested safe road crossings particularly for children and pedestrians who would face this problem. However, they offered full 3 6 Nov, 2016 Bazikhel 17301- 16185-5 - Ms. Saba Jahan assistance for the road improvement. Other issues and requests- facing severe problems of load shedding 6 Nov, 2016 Bazikhel 17301- 0757882 - Ms. Hussan Bano and gas supply, need of government schools for primary level, and need for Daskari Centre -were not within the purview of the current project. 6 Nov, 2016 Bazikhel - Ms. Akhraj Bibi

Khattak Colony, The women respondents 6 Nov, 2016 17301- 2349817-1 - Ms. Malyar Bibi Badaber were positive towards the rehabilitation of the road. Khattak Colony, 6 Nov, 2016 17301- 2401165-4 - Ms. Nadia Bibi 4 Badaber They requested for safety measures as speed Khattak Colony, breakers, to prevent 6 Nov, 2016 17301- 4687869-1 - Ms. Nazeera Bibi Badaber frequent road accidents.

NHA EALS Page 32

Loan 3574-Pak PAK: CAREC MFF, Tranche-1 Project Social DDR

Annex- E: Stakeholder’s Consultation held in August 2018 List of Participants form NHA zonal and Regional Office. Date Venue Name of Officer 08-08-2018 NHA Complex, Chamkani - Mr. Shahid Ihsanullah, Member (North Zone) Interchange, Peshawar

08-08-2018 NHA Complex, Chamkani - Mr. Ghulam Mujtaba, General Manager (Maintenance), Interchange, Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - Mr. Ashfaq Ahmad, Project Director (IH) - Mr. Muhammad Zia, Deputy Director (Maintenance), KP. - Mr. Muhammad Ismail, Inspector, NHA, Peshawar, KP.

09-08-2018 Office of the Director (LM&IS), - Mr. Farid Khan Marwat, Director (LM&IS) North Zone, NHA, Peshawar - Syed Ahmad Kamal, Assistant Director (LM&IS)

List of Participants in FGD meetings during Consultations Public Category of Contact No. Location/ consultatio Date participant Name of Participants Venue n No. s 1 10-08-2018 Shaheed Local - Syed Mir Ahmad Shah Ghari, community/ Syed Noorulalh Shah 0345-9053802) Badaber school - Mr. Adnan Khan teachers - Ms. Amber Iqbal - Ms. Humaira Zaman 2 10-08-2018 Shaheed Local - Mr. Iran Khan 03459281351 Ghari, community - Mr. Narang Khan Badaber - Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim - Mr. Naqeeb Khan - Mr. Muhammad Asim - Mr. Zarbat Khan

3 10-08-2018 Shuhda Local - Mr. Faisal Khan (Mani 03333346444 Chowk community Khel) 0335-6669444 (Abas - Mr. Bahar Khan (Mullah Chowk) Khel) - Mr. Muhammad Asif 4 10-08-2018 Village Local - Mr. Salahud-Din 0345-8080814 Sher Alam community - Mr. Muhammad Rahim 0333-9452067 - Haji Israr 0333-9403718 - Mr. Zahar Muhammad - Mr. Shah Din (Village Sher Alam) - Mr. Sultan Muhammad - Mr. Zubair Khan (Sher Alam village) - Haji Khan - Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim -

NHA EALS Page 33