DOCSLIB.ORG

Fos Extracts - 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fos Extracts - 2010 FoS Extracts - 2010 Contents 2010-12-23 .................................................................................................................................................. 12 After Failure of Chicago Climate Exchange, California Opens the Pacific Carbon Exchange .............. 12 EPA to Limit Emissions from Power Plants, Refineries......................................................................... 12 Lawrence Solomon: Ontario's Odious Obligations ................................................................................. 13 Red Faces at the UK Met Office ............................................................................................................. 13 Germany Grows Tired of Leading Europe on Climate Change .............................................................. 13 On the Recovery from the Little Ice Age ................................................................................................ 13 2010-12-16 .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Walter Russell Mead: Bureaucrats Swindle Greens in Cancún .............................................................. 14 Corporate Irresponsibility - Deutsche Bank ............................................................................................ 14 US Foundations: Demarketing Alberta ................................................................................................... 15 Climate “Consensus” Opiate - The 97% Solution .................................................................................. 15 New NASA Model: Doubled CO 2 Means Just 1.64°C Warming ........................................................... 15 The Dessler Cloud Feedback Paper in Science : A Step Backward for Climate Research ...................... 16 2010-12-12 .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Climate Deal in Cancún .......................................................................................................................... 16 Lawrence Solomon: How to Renege on Egregious Green Contracts ..................................................... 16 Global Warming Case Goes to US Supreme Court ................................................................................ 17 US Congress Likely to Investigate Climategate ..................................................................................... 17 New Peer-Reviewed Paper Shows How Bad the Climate Models Really Are ....................................... 17 2010-12-06 .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Cancún Climate Change Summit: Japan, then Canada, Russia and Australia Oppose Extending Kyoto Protocol ................................................................................................................................................... 18 Rex Murphy: The Last Global Warming Conference Ever? .................................................................. 18 Terence Corcoran: Beyond Cancún, a Fossil-Fuel World ...................................................................... 18 Lawrence Solomon: Green Collapse....................................................................................................... 18 Sea Level Could Rise in the South, Fall in the North ............................................................................. 19 2010-12-02 .................................................................................................................................................. 19 US Republicans Axe Global Warming Panel and Threaten EPA Budget .............................................. 19 America Gets Gored ............................................................................................................................... 19 Black Days Ahead for the Carbon Industry ............................................................................................ 20 BBC Gives an Even-Handed Assessment of 2010 Temperature Prediction ........................................... 20 - 1 - FoS Extracts - 2010 Germany Announces Rollback on Green Subsidies ............................................................................... 20 2010-11-27 .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Cooling Climate Change: Environmental Inaction Seems to be Taking Hold ....................................... 21 Ontario's Pricey Green Dreams ............................................................................................................... 21 Carbon Tax Won't Hurt Alberta and Saskatchewan ............................................................................... 21 At Long Last: The Economist Adapts to Political Reality ...................................................................... 22 Wind Turbines in Europe and Ontario .................................................................................................... 22 2010-11-23 .................................................................................................................................................. 22 Climate of Confusion .............................................................................................................................. 22 Eastern Europe Puts Emergency Brakes on Solar Energy ...................................................................... 23 Spain's Solar Power Sector Falls into the Abyss..................................................................................... 23 Cancún: Global Climate Consensus Is Disintegrating ............................................................................ 23 The New Guard of Climate Questioners: Get Ready for the Next Round of Climate Science Debate .. 23 2010-11-18 .................................................................................................................................................. 24 Climate Change Bill Killed by Canadian Senate .................................................................................... 24 The Copenhagen Emissions Gap ............................................................................................................ 24 IPCC Official: “Climate Policy Is Redistributing the World's Wealth” ................................................. 25 Green Pork Fight: US Administration Begs China to Subsidize US Industry ........................................ 25 Geoengineering Liftoff ........................................................................................................................... 25 The Solar Dynamo and Its Influence on Terrestrial Surface Temperatures ............................................ 25 2010-11-12 .................................................................................................................................................. 26 Canadian Business Leaders Cite Need for Carbon Tax in Energy Strategy ........................................... 26 $1.1 Billion (Australian) Wasted on Solar Power ................................................................................... 26 Green Jobs in California Cut despite Subsidy ........................................................................................ 26 Climate Scientists Plan Campaign against Global Warming Skeptics ................................................... 26 The Climate Coincidence - Why Is the Temperature Unchanging? ....................................................... 27 Is the Western Climate Establishment Corrupt? - Complete Report ...................................................... 27 2010-10-24 .................................................................................................................................................. 27 Photovoltaic Companies Claim that Ontario's Solar Rules Hurt the Province ....................................... 27 Environmentalism: An Anti-Human Ideology ........................................................................................ 28 Scientific American : Why Can't We Have a Civil Conversation about Climate? ................................... 28 Experts Debate Climate Change Science and Policy .............................................................................. 28 Is the Western Climate Establishment Corrupt? Part 9 ........................................................................... 29 - 2 - FoS Extracts - 2010 2010-10-21 .................................................................................................................................................. 30 California's “Green Jobs” Nightmare ...................................................................................................... 30 Green Subsidies: Price Shock for German Electricity Customers .......................................................... 30 Renewables Will Add £880 a Year to UK Electricity Bills .................................................................... 30 Spain's Solar Deals on Edge of Bankruptcy as Subsidies Founder ......................................................... 31 Global Warming Propagandist Slapped Down ....................................................................................... 31 Is the Western Climate Establishment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds an End to Antisemitism!
    Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds An End to Antisemitism! Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman Volume 5 Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman ISBN 978-3-11-058243-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067196-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067203-9 DOI https://10.1515/9783110671964 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2021931477 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, Lawrence H. Schiffman, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com Cover image: Illustration by Tayler Culligan (https://dribbble.com/taylerculligan). With friendly permission of Chicago Booth Review. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com TableofContents Preface and Acknowledgements IX LisaJacobs, Armin Lange, and Kerstin Mayerhofer Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds: Introduction 1 Confronting Antisemitism through Critical Reflection/Approaches
    [Show full text]
  • The Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Matters
    BSTXXX10.1177/0270467617707079Bulletin of Science, Technology & SocietyPowell 707079research-article2017 Article Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 2016, Vol. 36(3) 157 –163 The Consensus on Anthropogenic © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Global Warming Matters DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617707079 10.1177/0270467617707079 journals.sagepub.com/home/bst James Lawrence Powell1 Abstract Skuce et al., responding to Powell, title their article, “Does It Matter if the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Is 97% or 99.99%?” I argue that the extent of the consensus does matter, most of all because scholars have shown that the stronger the public believe the consensus to be, the more they support the action on global warming that human society so desperately needs. Moreover, anyone who knows that scientists once thought that the continents are fixed in place, or that the craters of the Moon are volcanic, or that the Earth cannot be more than 100 million years old, understands that a small minority has sometimes turned out to be right. But it is hard to think of a case in the modern era in which scientists have been virtually unanimous and wrong. Moreover, as I show, the consensus among publishing scientists is demonstrably not 97%. Instead, five surveys of the peer-reviewed literature from 1991 to 2015 combine to 54,195 articles with an average consensus of 99.94%. Keywords global warming, climate change, consensus, peer review, history of science Introduction Consensus Skuce et al. (2016, henceforth S16), responding to Powell What does consensus in science mean and how can it best be (2016), ask, “Does it matter if the consensus on anthropo- measured? The Oxford English Dictionary (2016) defines genic global warming is 97% or 99.99%?” consensus as “Agreement in opinion; the collective unani- Of course it matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: Is the Science Really Settled?
    CLIMATE CHANGE: IS THE SCIENCE REALLY SETTLED? by Lawrence Solomon SPPI COMMENTARY & ESSAY SERIES ♦ February 25, 2010 CLIMATE CHANGE: IS THE SCIENCE REALLY SETTLED? A PRESENTATION TO THE COLORADO MINING ASSOCIATION by Lawrence Solomon | February 10, 2010 Thank you, Stuart, for that introduction. I’m grateful for the opportunity to address this gathering, although I’m not that pleased anymore with the title of my talk. “Climate Change – Is the Science Really Settled?” That seemed like a good title back in October, when Stuart invited me to come here. But a lot has happened since October. Chiefly, Climategate happened, one month later, in November. For those of you who haven’t heard of Climategate, this was the release – probably by a whistleblower – of some 3000 documents, many of them emails between some of the most important promoters of the global warming hypothesis. I call the “doomsayers,” not to be pejorative but because that term, “doomsayer,” most accurately describes their message. Before those emails came to light, the doomsayers were already in trouble. Public opinion in the US, the UK and other countries had already swung against the thesis that man is responsible for dangerous global warming. After the Climategate emails came to light, elite opinion began to turn against the doomsayers. I can now tell you with great confidence that there won’t be a cap and trade bill, there won’t be a national carbon tax, there won’t be national legislation of any significance, not in the US, not in other countries that have not yet adopted greenhouse gas legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Redacted Response
    From: Gillis, Justin To: Andrew Dessler Subject: RE: thoughts on Heartland Leak w.r.t. cloud feedback Date: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:23:54 AM Yes, he was making that complaint. "My papers get special treatment from the cabal," etc. etc. I have to say I read the reviews of the '11 paper, at your suggestion, and they looked completely professional and on-point to my unpracticed eye. -----Original Message----- From: On Behalf Of Andrew Dessler Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:07 PM To: Gillis, Justin Subject: Re: thoughts on Heartland Leak w.r.t. cloud feedback He's been trying to publish this, but it's been rejected at least twice and a third rejection is on the way (I think). Dick doesn't understand R^2 or, more likely, the argument is just a squirt of squids' ink designed to confuse. On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Gillis, Justin wrote: > He had choice words to say about your paper, by the way. "R-squared of .02! Can you believe that!" I take it that means he didn't like the width of your error bars, or some such... > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: On > Behalf Of Andrew Dessler > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:18 AM > To: Gillis, Justin > Subject: Re: thoughts on Heartland Leak w.r.t. cloud feedback > >> I trust you're treating these e-mails in strictest confidence, as I will. > > yes, do not worry. > >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: On >> Behalf Of Andrew Dessler >> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:59 AM >> To: Gillis, Justin >> Subject: Re: thoughts on Heartland Leak w.r.t.
    [Show full text]
  • "Legal Jihad": How Islamist Lawfare Tactics Are Targeting Free Speech
    "LEGAL JIHAD": HOW ISLAMIST LAWFARE TACTICS ARE TARGETING FREE SPEECH Brooke Goldstein andAaron Eitan Meyer* I. WELCOME TO LAWFARE .............................. 395 II. THE ISLAMIST MOVEMENT ............................. 396 III. LEGAL JIHAD ....................................... 397 IV. LAWFARE IN EUROPE & CANADA ....................... 400 V. ENGLAND .......................................... 402 V I. CANADA ........................................... 404 VII. THE NETHERLANDS .................................. 405 VEII. THE INTERNATIONAL SCENE ........................... 407 IX. CONCLUSION ....................................... 409 I. WELCOME TO LAWFARE Lawfare is usually defined as the use of the law as a weapon of war' or the pursuit of strategic aims through aggressive legal maneuvers.2 Traditionally, lawfare tactics have been used to obtain moral advantages over the enemy in the court of public opinion3 and to intimidate heads of state from acting out of fear of prosecution for war crimes.4 Al Qaeda training manuals instruct its captured * Brooke Goldstein is a practicing attorney, an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute, an award- winning filmmaker and director of the Legal Project at the Middle East Forum. The Legal Project is dedicated to providing pro-bono legal representation to authors, activists and publishers who work on the topics of radical Islam, terrorism and their sources of financing. Goldstein is the founder and director of the Children's Rights Institute, a not-for-profit dedicated to raising awareness about and legally combating the incitement and recruitment of children as suicide bombers. She is also the 2007 recipient of the E. Nathaniel Gates Award for Outstanding Public Advocacy. Aaron Eitan Meyer recently received his Juris Doctor degree from Touro Law Center, and serves as the assistant director at the Legal Project at the Middle East Forum as well as legal correspondent to the Terror Finance Blog.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Chains the Black and Aboriginal Slaves Who Helped Build New France
    Borduas’s revolution • Alzheimer’s dilemmas SPUR FESTIVAL Ottawa and Vancouver preview! $6.50 Vol. 22, No. 4 May 2014 Lawrence Hill Uncovering the chains The black and aboriginal slaves who helped build New France. ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Jocelyn Maclure Why democracy needs protests Candace Savage A prairie pilgrimage Jonathan Kay Reviving the Enlightenment PLUS: NON-FICTION David Milligan on debunking our “historical illiteracy” + Christopher Dummitt on a West Coast riot + Molly Worthen on coexistence through religious limits + David MacDonald on a made-in-Canada church + Jennifer Jeffs on regulating the markets since 2008 + Denise Donlon on the Tales of Bachman Publications Mail Agreement #40032362 FICTION Claire Holden Rothman reviews Wonder by Dominique Fortier + Roger Seamon Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to LRC, Circulation Dept. reviews Life Class by Ann Charney PO Box 8, Station K Toronto, ON M4P 2G1 POETRY Shane Neilson + Elizabeth Ross + Crystal Hurdle + Kayla Czaga Literary Review of Canada 170 Bloor St West, Suite 710 Toronto ON M5S 1T9 email: [email protected] reviewcanada.ca T: 416-531-1483 • F: 416-531-1612 Charitable number: 848431490RR0001 To donate, visit reviewcanada.ca/support Vol. 22, No. 4 • May 2014 EDITOR Bronwyn Drainie [email protected] CONTRIBUTING EDITORS 2 Outthinking Ourselves 15 May Contain Traces Mark Lovewell, Molly Peacock, Robin A review of Enlightenment 2.0, by Joseph Heath A poem Roger, Anthony Westell Jonathan Kay Kayla Czaga ASSOCIATE EDITOR Judy Stoffman 4 Market Rules 18 Under the Volcano POETRY EDITOR A review of Transnational Financial Regulation A review of Wonder, by Dominique Fortier, Moira MacDougall after the Crisis, edited by Tony Porter translated by Sheila Fischman COPY EDITOR Jennifer Jeffs Claire Holden Rothman Madeline Koch 7 The Memory Thief 19 Making It ONLINE EDITORS Diana Kuprel, Jack Mitchell, A review of The Alzheimer Conundrum: A review of Life Class, by Ann Charney Donald Rickerd, C.M.
    [Show full text]
  • View Program
    Upcoming Events WELCOME TO THE MOwaT CENTRE’s Join us in April 11-12, 2013 in Cleveland, Ohio for the launch of the new Council for the Great Lakes Region in partnership with Case Western Reserve University’s Canada-US Law Institute. THREE YEAR The Council of the Great Lakes Region will: ANNIVERSARY • Connect regional actors • Inform decision-makers and the public • Cultivate a unified regional voice PARTY! • Promote the region’s prosperity and sustainability www.councilgreatlakesregion.org About Mowat Centre The Mowat Centre is an independent public policy research centre located at the School of Public Policy & Governance at the University of Toronto. The Mowat Centre is Ontario’s non-partisan, evidence- based voice on public policy. It undertakes collaborative applied policy research, proposes innovative research-driven recommendations, and engages in public dialogue on Canada’s most important national issues. www.mowatcentre.ca THE MOWAT CENTRE | WWW.MOWATCENTRE.CA Speakers MADELAINE DROHAN Madelaine is the Canada correspondent for The Economist. For the last 30 years, she has covered business and politics in Canada, Europe, Africa and Asia. She is the author of “The 9 Habits of Highly Successful Resource Economies: Lessons for Canada”, a research report that she wrote in 2012 for the Canadian International Council. Her book, “Making a Killing: How and Why Corporations Use Armed Force To Do Business”, was published in 2003. She also conducts journalism workshops for media in Africa and Southeast Asia, with a special focus on business and investigative journalism and served on the boards of the North-South Institute, Transparency International Canada and Partnership Africa Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Deniers
    The Deniers – the world-renowned scientists who stood up against global warming hysteria, political persecution and fraud. by Lawrence Solomon, published by Richard Vigilante Books, 2008, ISBN 978-0-9800763-1-8 Does society benefit from a fear-driven science-funding policy that threatens the livelihood of scientists with the courage to argue against “orthodox” and established “beyond doubt” views on climate? The media drives this fear with increasingly hysterical messages that the earth is getting hotter, that this is being caused by human COB2B emissions and, that without radical social and economic surgery, we will face a myriad of global catastrophes, the like of which have not been seen since the dawn of our history. We are told that all serious scientists agree with this and that those few who dissent are either charlatans or are funded by the fossil fuel companies. Other dissenters are regarded on a par with creationists, Holocaust deniers or supporters of tobacco companies. But is this true? Is the science really settled? To answer this, Lawrence Solomon, the Canadian environmentalist and anti-nuclear campaigner, sought to find well-regarded scientists who disagreed with the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) hysteria promoted by Al Gore and the IPCC. The result was astonishing in that for all of the headline issues of the AGW hypothesis, he found dissenting scientists who were consistently the most accomplished and eminent people in their respective fields of expertise. In fact, the more he searched, the more there seemed to be, complete with data and analysis to support their positions. Chillingly, several of them, despite their substantial expertise and reputations, declined on-record interviews for fear of losing their funding and, in some cases, their jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Misuse of Antisemitism Statistics in Canada
    THE USE AND MISUSE OF ANTISEMITISM STATISTICS IN CANADA by Sheryl Nestel, PhD THE USE AND MISUSE OF ANTISEMTISM STATISTICS IN CANADA 1 The Use and Misuse of Antisemitism Statistics in Canada “Canadian Jews Most Targeted Group for Third Year in a Row” [1] proclaimed B’nai Brith Canada in a press release issued on July 22, 2019. Jews and others who are deeply troubled by the spread of antisemitism worldwide must have been alarmed to learn that Canada was being added to the growing list of countries where antisemitism is on the rise.[2] But how accurate are B’nai Brith’s claims? Upon close examination, it turns out that B’nai Brith’s interpretation of the state of antisemitism in Canada is misleading at best, perhaps deliberately so. The alarming headline actually obscures a complex web of established facts, dubious claims, overt and covert political agendas, avoidable inaccuracies, methodological opacity and unexplained exclusions - all of which demand examination. Since 1982, B’nai Brith Canada has published an Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents which the organization claims to be an “authoritative document on antisemitism in Canada.”[3] Indeed, the Audit is very widely cited. It has been employed for decades by Canada’s unfailingly pro-Israel governments as well as by an impressive range of media outlets including the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, The Globe and Mail, the Calgary Herald, Radio Canada, the U.S. State Department and THE USE AND MISUSE OF ANTISEMTISM STATISTICS IN CANADA 2 numerous other mainstream news sources Moreover, B’nai Brith’s claim that Jews are the and civil institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediating Public Science: Experts, Politics, and Climate Change in the News Media in Canada
    MEDIATING PUBLIC SCIENCE: EXPERTS, POLITICS, AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE NEWS MEDIA IN CANADA BERNHARD ISOPP A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO October 2018 © Bernhard Isopp, 2018 Abstract This project offers a reconstructionist science and technology studies (STS) analysis of climate change coverage in three Canadian newspapers, the Globe and Mail, the National Post, and the Toronto Star from 2006 to 2013. It employs a combination of framing, critical discourse, and philosophical analyses to address two core questions: (1) Why has climate change been represented in these newspapers in the ways it has? (2) What effects have these newspapers had in shaping issues of climate change? These broad inquiries are organised by a set of six more specific conceptual concerns stemming from STS: i) How do scientists relate, engage, and compete with other actors in influencing climate change coverage? ii) To what extent can these newspapers be understood as a site of scientific practice, communication, and knowledge production? iii) What broader social, political, and economic factors are linked to the competing representations of climate change and actor coalitions that emerge in these newspapers? iv) What broader images, ideologies, and philosophies of science and scientists shape and emerge from these media discourses? v) What do STS conceptions of scientific rhetoric suggest about these discourses? vi) How is the authority of science and scientists established, affected, challenged, and undermined through and by all these interacting influences and processes? While the answers to these questions are multifaceted, the authority of science is a culminating theme.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Steyn and the Canadian Human Rights Commissions
    ‘Reasonable limits on the expression of hatred’: Mark Steyn and the Canadian Human Rights Commissions Matthew Omolesky I. On 20 October 2006, the website of the Canadian weekly current affairs magazine Maclean’s featured an article entitled ‘The future belongs to Islam,’ excerpted from the conservative polemicist Mark Steyn’s book America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It. [1] This provocative opinion piece presented a vision of European ‘demographic decline; the unsustainability of the social democratic state; and civilisational exhaustion,’ all of which paved the way for the continent’s ‘remorseless transformation into Eurabia.’ [2] Since ‘the salient feature of Europe, Canada, Japan and Russia is that they’re running out of babies,’ Steyn contended, ‘Europe has age and welfare,’ but ‘Islam has youth and will.’ [3] The article ended ominously, with a quotation from the Norwegian imam Mullah Krekar, who had recently told the Oslo newspaper Dagbladet: ‘We’re the ones who will change you [Europeans]. Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes. Every Western woman in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries is producing 3.5 children… Our way of thinking will prove more powerful than yours.’ [4] One question of Steyn’s, concerning this allegedly existential demographic and geopolitical threat, was meant to linger: ‘How does the state react?’ Ironically, it would be how the state reacted to Steyn – rather than immigration – that would take centre stage. One key non-state reaction to Steyn’s article was that of Mohamed Elmasry, president of the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC), who eventually submitted complaints against Maclean’s and its editor, Kenneth Whyte, to the human rights commissions of British Columbia and Ontario, as well as the federal Canadian Human Rights Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers at the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change
    12/10/2015 The Heartland Institute - Confirmed Speakers at the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change speakers last updated: March 5, 2009 The complete program for the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change, including cosponsor information and brief biographies of all speakers, can be downloaded in Adobe's PDF format here. More than 70 of the world’s elite scientists, economists and others specializing in climate issues will confront the subject of global warming at the second annual International Conference on Climate Change March 8­10, 2009 in New York City. They will call attention to new research that contradicts claims that Earth’s moderate warming during the twentieth century primarily was man­made and has reached crisis proportions. Headliners among the 70­plus presenters will be: American astronaut Dr. Jack Schmitt—the last living man to walk on the moon. William Gray, Colorado State University, leading researcher into tropical weather patterns. Richard Lindzen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, one of the world’s leading experts in dynamic meteorology, especially planetary waves. Stephen McIntyre, primary author of Climate Audit, a blog devoted to the analysis and discussion of climate data. He is a devastating critic of the temperature record of the past 1,000 years, particularly the work of Michael E. Mann, creator of the infamous “hockey stick” graph. That graph­­thoroughly discredited in scientific circles­­supposedly proved that mankind is responsible for a sharp increase in earth temperatures. Arthur Robinson, curator of a global warming petition signed by more than 32,000 American scientists, including more than 10,000 with doctorate degrees, rejecting the alarmist assertion that global warming has put the Earth in crisis and is caused primarily by mankind.
    [Show full text]