DOCSLIB.ORG

India's Ruling Party Tumbles After State Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
India's Ruling Party Tumbles After State Elections :: Issue Analyses India’s ruling party tumbles after state elections Kim Chan-wahn Professor of the Graduate School of International and Area Studies Hankuk University of Foreign Studies ahul Gandhi, the crown prince of the Nehru-Grandhi “ family, is missing in Delhi.” Many people complained that Rahul Gandhi, the general-secretary of the Indian R National Congress, was nowhere to be seen during the elections held in February and March across five states: Punjab, Uttarakhand, Manipur, Goa, and Uttar Pradesh. Of these five states, Uttar Pradesh is politically the most important, and it was for this reason that Rahul Gandhi risked his political career pouring all his energy into the Uttar Pradesh election campaigns. Now that the assembly elections are over, people are complaining again that Rahul Gandhi cannot be seen in Delhi. After humiliating defeat in the Uttar Pradesh assembly election revealed the severe limitations of his politics and popularity, Rahul Gandhi stopped making regular appearances at important political events. 115 Summer 2012�POSRI Chindia Quarterly ○● INC and BJP’s crushing defeats The five state assembly elections in 2012 served as a mid-term review of the current government, which is led by the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), and as a barometer for the results of the upcoming 2014 general elections. There was heavy anti-incumbent sentiment in Uttar Pradesh and Goa, while the ruling party won the elections in Punjab and Manipur. In Uttarakhand, a coalition government took office through strong anti- incumbent sentiment and other factors working together. Of the five state elections, all eyes were on Uttar Pradesh, the window on Indian elections. Voter turnout increased by 14%, from 46% in 2007. This is not the only record that Uttar Pradesh state elections broke. As many as 223 parties vied for the 403 seats of the legislative assembly. The number of parties has almost doubled from 131 in the 2007 election. However, only six parties managed to take seats. Independents took 14 seats. What is notable in this election is that the opposition Samajwadi Party (SP) has taken seats from the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the former ruling party. The BSP lost 126 seats from the 2007 election, while the SP won 127 new seats. As a result, political power in Uttar Pradesh has shifted from the BSP to the SP. Yadav Akhilsh Yadav, son of Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh was sworn in as the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, India’s 2012 five state election results Uttar Pradesh Punjab Uttarakhand Manipur Goa Ruling party SP (224) SAD (56) INC (32) INC (42) BJP (21) in 2012 Ruling party BSP (206) SAD (48) BJP (34) INC (30) INC (19) in 2007 Note: SAD (Shiromani Akali Dal), BSP (Bahujan Samaj Party) 116 POSRI Chindia Quarterly�Summer 2012 :: Issue Analyses beginning a hereditary succession of politics in Uttar Pradesh. Following the Uttar Pradesh election, a two-party system with region- based parties, the BSP and the SP, has been established in Uttar Pradesh. On the other hand, the nation-wide Indian National Congress (INC) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have suffered disappointing results. The INC gained six seats in this election; this is clear evidence of the INC’s limitations, considering that Rahul Gandhi orchestrated the election campaign from start to finish, and used all the resources of his party. The INC found itself agonizing over what stances it would take in the most important political state, Uttar Pradesh. The situation is worse for the BJP. The party lost four seats in this election. It now seems difficult to believe that the BJP once held the reins of Uttar Pradesh. The BJP, which took power under the banner of Hindu fundamentalism, has lost ground with recent failures in a series of elections, indicating that a platform based on Hindu fundamentalism is not enough to win the hearts of the Indian public. With no alternative plan in the works, the BJP has reason enough to worry. ○● Small parties with a big say As a result of the last elections, the INC’s political power and legitimacy have deteriorated. Moreover, the success of local parties in the Uttar Pradesh and Punjab elections has re-empowered small local parties, laying the foundation for these parties to grow into a third political force. The Trinamool Congress (TMC), with the second largest number of seats in the UPA-led government, after the INC, left the UPA government, and sought cooperation with other political powers. This is one factor that is intensifying worries about the potential fall of the UPA government. Following the recent election, Railway Minister Dinesh Trivedi, who belongs to the TMC, alluded to the possibility of early general elections. He underpinned early elections, saying that if he were SP chief Mulayam Singh, 117 Summer 2012�POSRI Chindia Quarterly he would prepare for early As a result of the last elections, the elections. If early elections take INC’s political power and legitimacy place, the SP is very likely to have deteriorated. Moreover, the success of local parties in the Uttar secure the largest number of Pradesh and Punjab elections has seats in Uttar Pradesh. The re-empowered small local parties. TMC also expects that early elections would help secure more seats in West Bengal, which is currently under its control. The TMC worries that if the general elections are held in 2014 as scheduled, it would be difficult to secure more seats under stronger anti-incumbent sentiment. If the TMC leaves the UPA government and the SP withdraws its support, the INC-led UPA government will likely collapse. If this possibility becomes greater, small local parties will gain more collective power, making early elections feasible. The current situation is similar to the one between 1996 and 1998, when central politics were unstable and leaders of small local parties vied for the prime ministerial post. If early elections are not realized, it is important for the INC to make wise decisions in running the government until 2014, having already lost popularity. Even if the INC secures the majority of seats in the next election, the ruling party will have to govern while keeping a constant eye on small local parties. ○● UPA’s scenarios for retaining power Given current circumstances, Indian politics could unfold in one of two scenarios: The best-case scenario for the INC is if the TMC leaves the UPA coalition government, and the SP maintains its support for the UPA; the INC would be able to operate the government stably until 2014. In this case, the INC would have to concede major central government posts to the SP in 118 POSRI Chindia Quarterly�Summer 2012 :: Issue Analyses 2012 Uttar Pradesh elections results 2007 2012 Party No. of seats + / - No. of seats + / - Samajwadi Party 97 ▽55 224 ▲127 Bahujan Samaj Party 206 ▲139 80 ▽126 Bhartiya Janata Party 51 ▽32 47 ▽4 Indian National Congress 22 ▽328▲6 Rashtriya Lok Dal 10 ▽59▽1 Nationalist Congress Party - - 1 - Rashtriya Parivartan Dal 2 - - - Akhil Bhartiya Loktantrik 1--- Congress (ABLC) JD (U) 1 - - - UP United Democratic 1--- Front (UPUDF) Bharatiya Jan Shakti 1 - - - Jan Morcha 1 - - - Rashtriya Swabhimaan Party 1 - - - Independents 9 - 14 ▲5 Total no. 403 - 403 - Source: Election Commission of India, 2012 return for its support, and would have to accept that its policies must not oppose those of the SP, even in Uttar Pradesh. It would also have to support comprehensive measures for Yadavs, part of the Shudra caste, and Muslims ─the two main pillars of public support for the SP. With state elections 119 Summer 2012�POSRI Chindia Quarterly around the corner, the UPA government announced on December 22, 2011 that it would include Muslims in the Other Backward Classes (OBC) and allocate 4.5% of jobs to them. The Hindu-fundamentalist BJP was stringently opposed to this decision. However, the SP offered pledges favorable to the poor, as did the UPA: job allocation for minorities, including Muslims; prohibition of land expropriation opposed by farmers; and provision of low interest rates, about 4%, to small farmers. The worst-case scenario is if the TMC leave the UPA government, and the SP wants to have early elections. If this happens, the current UPA government is highly likely to collapse. In order to prevent this situation, the INC is meeting all requests from the TMC, even the most baseless requests. For example, when the government announced the railway budget, which included an increase in passenger fares, TMC chief Mamata Banerjee demanded the withdrawal of the fare hike and the resignation of the Railway Minister, and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh acquiesced. For the time being, the TMC will likely remain in step with the UPA coalition government, and the SP will implicitly cooperate with the INC, and the current UPA government is expected to last at least until the end of 2012. However, if the INC, which leads the UPA coalition government, is completely defeated by opposition parties in the Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh state assembly elections, which are scheduled to be held at the end of 2012, the UPA government will very likely collapse. ○● Difficult land expropriation for development With the political season around the corner, many parties are advocating grassroots policies. Therefore, India’s economic policies will become even more grassroots-friendly, seeking inclusive growth for the poor. Due to the outcome of the recent elections, the possibility is high that expropriation of land owned by farmers at the declared land price will become more difficult. Oppressive land expropriation was an important 120 POSRI Chindia Quarterly�Summer 2012 :: Issue Analyses factor in the complete defeat of the BSP in the recent Uttar Pradesh election.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2019/05 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee Amory Gethin Thomas Piketty March 2019 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee, Amory Gethin, Thomas Piketty* January 16, 2019 Abstract This paper combines surveys, election results and social spending data to document the long-run evolution of political cleavages in India. From a dominant- party system featuring the Indian National Congress as the main actor of the mediation of political conflicts, Indian politics have gradually come to include a number of smaller regionalist parties and, more recently, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These changes coincide with the rise of religious divisions and the persistence of strong caste-based cleavages, while education, income and occupation play little role (controlling for caste) in determining voters’ choices. We find no evidence that India’s new party system has been associated with changes in social policy. While BJP-led states are generally characterized by a smaller social sector, switching to a party representing upper castes or upper classes has no significant effect on social spending. We interpret this as evidence that voters seem to be less driven by straightforward economic interests than by sectarian interests and cultural priorities. In India, as in many Western democracies, political conflicts have become increasingly focused on identity and religious-ethnic conflicts
    [Show full text]
  • William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner
    The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner by Dante Joseph Basista Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2019 The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner Dante Joseph Basista I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Dante Basista, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Donna DeBlasio, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT This is a study of the correspondence and published writings of three-time Democratic Presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan in relation to his role in the anti-imperialist movement that opposed the US acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War. Historians have disagreed over whether Bryan was genuine in his opposition to an American empire in the 1900 presidential election and have overlooked the period following the election in which Bryan’s editorials opposing imperialism were a major part of his weekly newspaper, The Commoner. The argument is made that Bryan was authentic in his opposition to imperialism in the 1900 presidential election, as proven by his attention to the issue in the two years following his election loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Chap 2 PF.Indd
    Credit: Shankar I ts chptr… The challenge of nation-building, covered in the last chapter, was This famous sketch accompanied by the challenge of instituting democratic politics. Thus, by Shankar appeared electoral competition among political parties began immediately after on the cover of his collection Don’t Spare Independence. In this chapter, we look at the first decade of electoral Me, Shankar. The politics in order to understand original sketch was • the establishment of a system of free and fair elections; drawn in the context of India’s China policy. But • the domination of the Congress party in the years immediately this cartoon captures after Independence; and the dual role of the Congress during the era • the emergence of opposition parties and their policies. of one-party dominance. 2021–22 chapter 2 era of one-party dominance Challenge of building democracy You now have an idea of the difficult circumstances in which independent India was born. You have read about the serious challenge of nation-building that confronted the country right in the beginning. Faced with such serious challenges, leaders in many other countries of the world decided that their country could not afford to have democracy. They said that national unity was their first priority and that democracy will introduce differences and conflicts. In India,…. Therefore many of the countries that gained freedom from colonialism …hero-worship, plays a part “ experienced non-democratic rule. It took various forms: nominal in its politics unequalled democracy but effective control by one leader, one party rule or direct in magnitude by the part army rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Coalition in India
    Journal of Power, Politics & Governance March 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 01–11 ISSN: 2372-4919 (Print), 2372-4927 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Politics of Coalition in India Farooq Ahmad Malik1 and Bilal Ahmad Malik2 Abstract The paper wants to highlight the evolution of coalition governments in india. The evaluation of coalition politics and an analysis of how far coalition remains dynamic yet stable. How difficult it is to make policy decisions when coalition of ideologies forms the government. More often coalitions are formed to prevent a common enemy from the government and capturing the power. Equally interesting is the fact a coalition devoid of ideological mornings survives till the enemy is humbled. While making political adjustments, principles may have to be set aside and in this process ideology becomes the first victim. Once the euphoria victory is over, differences come to the surface and the structure collapses like a pack of cards. On the grounds of research, facts and history one has to acknowledge india lives in politics of coalition. Keywords: india, government, coalition, withdrawal, ideology, partner, alliance, politics, union Introduction Coalition is a phenomenon of a multi-party government where a number of minority parties join hands for the purpose of running the government which is otherwise not possible. A coalition is formed when many groups come into common terms with each other and define a common programme or agenda on which they work. A coalition government always remains in pulls and pressures particularly in a multinational country like india.
    [Show full text]
  • Hindutva and Anti-Muslim Communal Violence in India Under the Bharatiya Janata Party (1990-2010) Elaisha Nandrajog Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2010 Hindutva and Anti-Muslim Communal Violence in India Under the Bharatiya Janata Party (1990-2010) Elaisha Nandrajog Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Nandrajog, Elaisha, "Hindutva and Anti-Muslim Communal Violence in India Under the Bharatiya Janata Party (1990-2010)" (2010). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 219. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/219 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE HINDUTVA AND ANTI-MUSLIM COMMUNAL VIOLENCE IN INDIA UNDER THE BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY (1990-2010) SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR RODERIC CAMP AND PROFESSOR GASTÓN ESPINOSA AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY ELAISHA NANDRAJOG FOR SENIOR THESIS (Spring 2010) APRIL 26, 2010 2 CONTENTS Preface 02 List of Abbreviations 03 Timeline 04 Introduction 07 Chapter 1 13 Origins of Hindutva Chapter 2 41 Setting the Stage: Precursors to the Bharatiya Janata Party Chapter 3 60 Bharat : The India of the Bharatiya Janata Party Chapter 4 97 Mosque or Temple? The Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi Dispute Chapter 5 122 Modi and his Muslims: The Gujarat Carnage Chapter 6 151 Legalizing Communalism: Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act (2002) Conclusion 166 Appendix 180 Glossary 185 Bibliography 188 3 PREFACE This thesis assesses the manner in which India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has emerged as the political face of Hindutva, or Hindu ethno-cultural nationalism. The insights of scholars like Christophe Jaffrelot, Ashish Nandy, Thomas Blom Hansen, Ram Puniyani, Badri Narayan, and Chetan Bhatt have been instrumental in furthering my understanding of the manifold elements of Hindutva ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • Failure of the Mahagathbandhan
    ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Failure of the Mahagathbandhan In the Lok Sabha elections of 2019 in Uttar Pradesh, the contest was keenly watched as the alliance of the Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party, and Rashtriya Lok Dal took on the challenge against the domination of the Bharatiya Janata Party. What contributed to the continued good performance of the BJP and the inability of the alliance to assert its presence is the focus of analysis here. In the last decade, politics in Uttar Pradesh (UP) has seen radical shifts. The Lok Sabha elections 2009 saw the Congress’s comeback in UP. It gained votes in all subregions of UP and also registered a sizeable increase in vote share among all social groups. The 2012 assembly elections gave a big victory to the Samajwadi Party (SP) when it was able to get votes beyond its traditional voters: Muslims and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). The 2014 Lok Sabha elections saw the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) winning 73 seats with its ally Apna Dal. It was facilitated by the consolidation of voters cutting across caste and class, in favour of the party. Riding on the popularity of Narendra Modi, the BJP was able to trounce the regional parties and emerge victorious in the 2017 assembly elections as well. But, against the backdrop of anti-incumbency, an indifferent economic record, and with the coming together of the regional parties, it was generally believed that the BJP would not be able to replicate its success in 2019. However, the BJP’s performance in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections shows its continued domination over the politics of UP.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participating Political Parties and Abbreviations
    Election Commission of India- State Election, 2008 to the Legislative Assembly Of Rajasthan LIST OF PARTICIPATING POLITICAL PARTIES PARTY TYPE ABBREVIATION PARTY NATIONAL PARTIES 1 . BJP Bharatiya Janata Party 2 . BSP Bahujan Samaj Party 3 . CPI Communist Party of India 4 . CPM Communist Party of India (Marxist) 5 . INC Indian National Congress 6 . NCP Nationalist Congress Party STATE PARTIES - OTHER STATES 7 . AIFB All India Forward Bloc 8 . CPI(ML)(L) Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation) 9 . INLD Indian National Lok Dal 10 . JD(S) Janata Dal (Secular) 11 . JD(U) Janata Dal (United) 12 . RLD Rashtriya Lok Dal 13 . SHS Shivsena 14 . SP Samajwadi Party REGISTERED(Unrecognised) PARTIES 15 . ABCD(A) Akhil Bharatiya Congress Dal (Ambedkar) 16 . ABHM Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha 17 . ASP Ambedkar Samaj Party 18 . BHBP Bharatiya Bahujan Party 19 . BJSH Bharatiya Jan Shakti 20 . BRSP Bharatiya Rashtravadi Samanta Party 21 . BRVP Bhartiya Vikas Party 22 . BVVP Buddhiviveki Vikas Party 23 . DBSP Democratic Bharatiya Samaj Party 24 . DKD Dalit Kranti Dal 25 . DND Dharam Nirpeksh Dal 26 . FCI Federal Congress of India 27 . IJP Indian Justice Party 28 . IPC Indian People¿S Congress 29 . JGP Jago Party 30 . LJP Lok Jan Shakti Party 31 . LKPT Lok Paritran 32 . LSWP Loktantrik Samajwadi Party 33 . NLHP National Lokhind Party 34 . NPSF Nationalist People's Front ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS - INDIA (Rajasthan ), 2008 LIST OF PARTICIPATING POLITICAL PARTIES PARTY TYPE ABBREVIATION PARTY REGISTERED(Unrecognised) PARTIES 35 . RDSD Rajasthan Dev Sena Dal 36 . RGD Rashtriya Garib Dal 37 . RJVP Rajasthan Vikas Party 38 . RKSP Rashtriya Krantikari Samajwadi Party 39 . RSD Rashtriya Sawarn Dal 40 .
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Moments: the Role of Direct Popular Power in the American Constitutional Order
    University of Pennsylvania Law Review FOUNDED 1852 Formerly American Law Register VOL. 139 DECEMBER 1990 No. 2 ARTICLES REPUBLICAN MOMENTS: THE ROLE OF DIRECT POPULAR POWER IN THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER James Gray Popet INTRODUCTION .................................. 289 I. POPULAR VS. ELITIST REPUBLICANISM ON DIRECT POPULAR PARTICIPATION ............................... 295 A. Background: The Republican Revival ............. 296 t Associate Professor of Law, Rutgers University School of Law, Newark, New Jersey. A.B. 1974,J.D. 1983 Harvard University. Earlier versions of this paper were presented to the Boston University Legal History Group and the Rutgers Law Faculty Colloquium. The final product benefitted greatly from critical comments by Akhil Reed Amar, C. Edwin Baker, CathieJo Martin, Eric Neisser, Richard Davies Parker, and John M. Payne. I am especially indebted to Vicki Been, Richard Revesz, and Aviam Soifer, who provided detailed critiques on short notice. James C.N. Paul gave guidance and encouragement throughout. Able research assistance was provided by Lisa Buckley, John Cioffi, Angela DiLeo, Nancy Gage, Sandra Levy, Mary Uva, Rosalind Westlake, and David Zuckerbrot. The S.I. Newhouse Research Fund supplied much-needed financial support. (287) 288 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 139:287 B. Direct PopularParticipation and the Problem of Size .... 297 C. The Elitist Solution .......................... 299 D. Back to Square One .......................... 301 E. A PopularRepublican Dilemma .................... 302 II. REPUBLICAN MOMENTS .......................... 304 A. Ackerman's ConstitutionalMoments ................ 304 B. Public Purpose and Creedal Passion ................ 306 C. Republican Moments ......................... 310 D. PopularRepublican Pathologies? ................... 313 III. REPUBLICAN MOMENTS AS A PARTIAL ANTIDOTE TO INTEREST GROUP POLITICS .............................. 315 A. From Narrow Self-Interest to Public Virtue ...........
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of RECOGNISED NATIONAL PARTIES (As on 11.01.2017)
    LIST OF RECOGNISED NATIONAL PARTIES (as on 11.01.2017) Sl. Name of the Name of President/ Address No. Party General secretary 1. Bahujan Samaj Ms. Mayawati, Ms. Mayawati, Party President President Bahujan Samaj Party 4, Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi –110001. 2. Bharatiya Janata Shri Amit Anilchandra Shri Amit Anilchandra Shah, Party Shah, President President Bharatiya Janata Party 11, Ashoka Road, New Delhi – 110001 3. Communist Party Shri S. Sudhakar Reddy, Shri S. Sudhakar Reddy, of India General Secretary General Secretary, Communist Party of India Ajoy Bhawan, Kotla Marg, New Delhi – 110002. 4. Communist Party Shri Sitaram Yechury, Shri Sitaram Yechury, of General Secretary General Secretary India (Marxist) Communist Party of India (Marxist) ,A.K.Gopalan Bhawan,27-29, Bhai Vir Singh Marg (Gole Market), New Delhi - 110001 5. Indian National Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Congress President President Indian National Congress 24,Akbar Road, New Delhi – 110011 6. Nationalist Shri Sharad Pawar, Shri Sharad Pawar, Congress Party President President Nationalist Congress Party 10, Bishambhar Das Marg, New Delhi-110001. 7. All India Ms. Mamta Banerjee, All India Trinamool Congress, Trinamool Chairperson 30-B, Harish Chatterjee Street, Congress Kolkata-700026 (West Bengal). LIST OF STATE PARTIES (as on 11.01.2017) S. No. Name of the Name of President/ Address party General Secretary 1. All India Anna The General Secretary- No. 41, Kothanda Raman Dravida Munnetra in-charge Street, Chennai-600021, Kazhagam (Tamil Nadu). (Puratchi Thalaivi Amma), 2. All India Anna The General Secretary- No.5, Fourth Street, Dravida Munnetra in-charge Venkatesware Nagar, Kazhagam (Amma), Karpagam Gardens, Adayar, Chennai-600020, (Tamil Nadu).
    [Show full text]
  • Is Lenin Still In? the 100 Years After the October Revolution
    Is Lenin still In? The 100 years after the October Revolution By Eric Mann This month marks the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution of October 1917. As we in the United States try to imagine a revolutionary opposition to the U.S. imperialist system a great appreciation of the achievements of the Russian revolution and the Soviet Union is a critical part of our revolutionary future. The Russian revolution created the Soviet Union—the first “workers state” and the first successful revolution that survived the world imperialist counterrevolution. The Bolshevik Party (the first communist party) was part of a united front of parties that seized power from the reactionary feudal Tsar in the February revolution of 1917. Then in October 1917 the Bolsheviks overthrew the forces of capitalism and seized state power from the social democratic Kerensky government. The Russian revolution came to power as an anti-war movement against the forces in Russia that wanted to continue World War I—one of the greatest imperialist bloodbaths of all time in which more than 18 million “workers of the world” were sent to their deaths by the capitalist governments of Europe with strong support from their “socialist” parties. The Bolshevik Party and Soviet State built its own military and police, defended themselves against external and internal capitalist attack, and survived in a hostile world for 72 years—a true miracle against all odds. From the perspective of the world’s exploited and oppressed people this was a profound achievement in human history and offered them an optimistic vision of their own future.
    [Show full text]