DOCSLIB.ORG

Countries (Araneae: Liocranidae) by Robert BOSMANS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BULLETIN DE L'INST ITUT ROYAL DES SC IENCES NATURELLES DE BELG IQUE ENTOMOLOG IE, 69: 25-34, 1999 BULLETIN VAN HET KON INKL JJ K BELG ISC H INSTI TUUT VOOR NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN ENTOMOLOGIE, 69: 25-34, I999 The genera Agroeca, Agraecina, Apostenus and Scotina in the Maghreb countries (Araneae: Liocranidae) by Robert BOSMANS Summary The fo ur genera have been rarely cited in the Magh­ reb. Not one species was mentioned in LucAs's (1846) The genera Agroeca, Agraeci11a , Apos1e1111s and Scoti11a occurring in standard work on the fa una of Algeri a. Only in 1932, the Maghrcb countries are revi sed. Eight species are recorded, four of wh ich arc new , the other four are re-described: Agroeca a1111ulipes SIMON menti oned the presence of Agroeca annulipes SIMON, Agroeca inopina O.P.-Cambridge, Agroeca 111aghrebe11 sis 11. SIMON , Agraecina lineata (SlMON) and Scotina celans sp., Agraeci11a li11ea1a (SI '10N), Agraeci11a hod11a n. sp. , Scolina ce/ans (BLACKWALL) in Algeria or Morocco. Twenty five years (BLACKIVall). Apos1e1111s maroccanus n. sp. and Apos1e11us a/gericus 11. later, DENIS (1956) described the species Agroeca lio­ sp. ;Jgroeca /io cra11oides DE I • 1956 i a junior synonym of A. m11111/ipes SIMON, 1878. Di stribution data of all species, in the Maghreb cranoides fro m Morocco. To my knowledge, these are but also in Europe are given. the onl y records concerning th e fo ur genera in the Magh­ reb. Key words: Liocranidae; taxonomy: distribution: Maghreb. Abbreviations: CJvK: Co ll ection Johan VA KEER; CPP: Co ll ection Piet POOT; introduction CRB: co ll ection Robert BosMANS; IRSNB: Institu t roya l des Sciences naturelles de Belgi­ During two collecting trips to Morocco-Algeria in 1982 que; and 1884, and during a permanent stay at the Houari MNHNP: Museum d'Histoire naturell e de Paris. Boumedienne University in Algiers, Algeria from 1987 Measurements are in mm. to 1991 , a large collection of A.raneae was obtained. Several results on the arachnofauna of Linyphii dae and Dysderidae ha ve been pub I ished, the most recent ones Description of species be ing BOSMANS ( 1996) and BELADJAL & BOSMANS ( 1997). In these papers, it was the purpose to describe or re­ Agroeca WESTRJ 'G, 1862 describe all species occurring in the Maghreb countries (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya and Mauritania), even Agroeca species are relative ly large Liocranids whi ch can the common European species. [n Algerian universities, be distingu ished by the presence of three pa irs of ventral and probably in universities of the other Maghreb coun­ spines on metatarsus I. Twenty four palaearctic and tries as well, there is a pennanent absence of identifi­ nearctic species have been described, of which some cation books, and it is increasingly difficult to gather the are insufficiently known; a few neotropical and oriental scattered literature concerning the arachnofauna of these species are probably misp laced in the genus. co untries. Descriptions of all occurring species are there­ Two species have been mentioned from the Maghreb. fore highly appreciated. In 1932, SIMON mentioned the presence in Algeria of The present paper is a first contribution to the systema­ Agroeca annulipes SIMON, a species formerly known only tics of the spid er family Liocranidae. The nomenclatural from Corsica. In I 956, DEN IS described Agroeca liocra­ stab il ity of thi s family is still in discussion. Following the noides, a new species from Morocco. most recent classifications of PLATNI CK ( 1997) and DIP­ PENAAR & JOCQUE ( 1997), the following liocranid genera occur in the Maghreb: Agroeca WESTRI NG 1862, Agrae­ Agroeca annulipes StMON, 1878 cina SIM ON 1932, Apos/enus WESTR ING 185 1, Brachya­ (Figs 1-4) ni/lus SIMO N 1913, Mesiotelus SIMON 1897, Phrurolini/­ lus WUNDERLICI I 1995, Phruro/ithus C.L. KOCH 1839, Agroeca annu/ipes SIMON 1878: 304 (descr. fema le); and Scotina MENGE 1873. In this paper, the genera Agroe­ SIMON 1932: 972 (descr. female, non male); CANARD ca, Agraecina and Apostenus and Scotina wi ll be treated. 1989: 28. 26 Robeti BOSMANS 1 -· ., . ; .... ·. .. : ~ . ..... ·. ... · .: .· ·. ·. :· 7 8 Figs. 1-4 - Agroeca annu!ipes SIMON. - l. Male palp lateral view; - 2. Idem, ventral view; - 3. Epigyne, ventral view; - 4. Vulva, ventral view. Fig . 5-8 - Agroeca maghrebensis n. sp. - 5. Male palp, lateral view; - 6. Idem, ventra l view· - 7. Ep igyne, ventral view; - 8. Vulva, ventral view. Agroeca liocranoides D E IS 1956: 198 (descr. female) that locality present in the MNHNP as the holotype. In (N. Syn.). my material from the Maghreb, conspecific females were rather frequently collected, often together with males, and Type material: Holotype female of A. annulipes from I am definitely sure they match. I redescribe here the France, Corsica, without futiher locality (MNHNP fe male, and describe the male for the first time. In 1932, 26419); examined. SIMON described what he thought to be the male of A. annulipes, but thi s is in fact a new species, also pre­ Diagnosis: Closely related to A. maghrebensis n. sp. in sent in our collection. S1MO N's specimen is not avail able colour and pination, but easil y distinguished in the male (absent in the MNHNP), but hi s Fig.ure of the male palp by the gently curved apophysis on the palpal tibia, in the with dorsal denticle on the tibi a allows clear identifica­ female by the epigyne with the medi an depression being tion. It is described below as a new species, closely much wider anteriorly than posteriorly and by the oblique related to A. annu/ipes but easil y distinguished by palps copulation duct . and epigyne. In 1956, DE IS described a female from Morocco as Remarks: SIMO ( 1878) described the species for a fe­ Agroeca liocranoides. I could not trace the type material. male from Corsica. I consider the only female from His Fig.ure of the epigyne shows the same oblique, clear- The genera Agroeca, Agraecina, Apostenus and Scotina 27 ly separated copulation ducts as in A. annulipes, consid­ - Saida: without fmther locality (StMON 1932). ered here as an important diagnostic character to separate - Tipasa: Bou Haroun, 30m, l female, stones in grass- it from related species. I therefore consider A. liocranoi­ land, 21.I.1987, R. BOSMA s leg. (CRB); Douaouda, des D EN IS, 1956 a junior synonym of A. annulipes SI MON, Oued Mazafran, 50m, 24 males 10 females, pitfalls in 1878. Populus alba forest, 16.XII.86-26.II. l 988, and 4 males 1 female in pitfall s in Olea maquis, 30.X.1988, R. BosMANS Description: leg. (1 male 1 female in MNHNP, 1 male 1 female in Measurements: Male: Total length 3.8-5.l; carapace IRSNB, rest in CRB); between Staoueli and Bouchaoui, 2.02-2.44 long, 1.44-1.96 wide. Female: Total length 5.4- 70m, lfemale, stones in rough grassland, 3.I.1987, R. 6.4; carapace 2.44-2.72 long, 1. 84-2.26 wide. BOSMANS leg. (CRB). Colour: Carapace w ith median yellowish brown, - Tissemsilt: Djebel Ouarsenis (StMON 1932). longitudinal sh·ipe, laterally mottled dark brown, pale - T lemcen: Nemours (SIMON 1932). specimens with submarginal yellowish brown sb·ipe; MOROCCO legs: Fe dark olive brow n, w ith narrow, di scontinuous - Ain Sebaa (DENIS 1956). yell owish brown stripes, Pa and Ti olive brown, Mt and Ta yellow ish brown, in Mt I-JI suffused with olive Distribution: Corsica (SI MON, 1878, 1932; CANARD, brown; abdomen dorsally w ith olive grey stripe with 1989), Sardinia (SIMON 1932), Morocco (DENlS 1956) postero-median dark grey chevrons. Female: carapace and Algeria (SIMON 1932); cited here also for the first as in male; legs yellow ish brown, Fe distinctly annulated time from Spain. with dark o li ve brown; abdomen dorsally dark brown, laterally mottled with dark grey; venter pale yellowish Ecology: Exclusively occurring at low altitudes near brown. the coast. Adult mainly in winter. Males were only Legs: Ti 1-II with two pair of ventral spines, Mt I-II collected in November, females from November to with three pair of ventral spines. May. Palp (Figs. 1-2): Tibia w ith bluntly pointed apophysis, sli ghtly curved upwards; median apophysis with broad base, distally with small pointed tooth; embolic part with Agroeca maghrebensis n. sp. small distal indentation. (Figs 5-8) Epigyne (Fig. 3): Relatively small compared to other Agroeca species; much longer than w ide, with elongate, Agroeca annulipes; SIMON 1932: 972 (descr. male, non posteriorly rounded median depression, nearly touching female). epigash·ic fuJTow, depression in anterior half with na1Tow median septum; depression often filled with secretions Type material: Holotype male from Algeri a, Wilaya of ("copulation marks"). Bouira, Ighrem, 490m in pitfall s among Tamarisk along V ul va (Fig. 4): Copulation ducts oblique, not touching Oued Sahe!, l 7.XI.1 986, R. BOSMANS leg.; deposited in in middle; spermathecae rounded, w ider than ducts. IRSNB. Material examined and citations: Diagnosis: Males of this species are easily distin­ FRANCE guished by the dorsal angularity on the male palpal tibia, - Corsica: La Po1ta, Muro, Vizzavona, Ba telica (SIMON females by the epigyne with median depression with 1878, 1932). parallel margins and x-shaped pattern of copulation SPAIN ducts. - Cadiz: Tarifa, I female, III.199 l, P. POOT leg. (CPP). - Malaga: Alozaina ., 200m, I male in litter in small Remarks: The male Fig.ured by SIMO (1932) as the male Quercus suber forest, 9.IV.1999, R. BOSMANS leg. (CRB). of Agroeca annu!ipes, SIMON 1878 apparently belongs to ITALY the species described here. - Sardinia: Sassari (SIMON 1932). ALGERIA Description: - Alger: without further locality (SIMON 1932); El Har­ Measurements: Male: Total length 4.0; carapace 2.06 rach, 25m, l female in garden, 30.I.1985, and 2 males, long, 1.68 wide.
Recommended publications
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
  • Taxonomic Notes on Agroeca (Araneae, Liocranidae)

    Taxonomic Notes on Agroeca (Araneae, Liocranidae)

    Arachnol. Mitt. 37: 27-30 Nürnberg, Juli 2009 Taxonomic notes on Agroeca (Araneae, Liocranidae) Torbjörn Kronestedt Abstract: Agroeca gaunitzi Tullgren, 1952 is stated here to be a junior synonym of A. proxima (O. P.-Cambridge, 1871). The illustrations of the male palp attributed to A. proxima in papers by Tullgren of 1946 and 1952 in fact show A. inopina O. P.-Cambridge, 1886. The record of A. inopina from Finland, quite outside its known distribution range, was based on a misidentification. It is argued that the type species of the genus Agroeca Westring, 1861 should be A. proxima (O. P.-Cambridge, 1871), not A. brunnea (Blackwall, 1833) as currently applied. Protagroeca Lohmander, 1944 is placed as an objective synonym of Agroeca Westring, 1861. Key words: Agroeca gaunitzi, synonyms, type species On the identity of Agroeca gaunitzi Tullgren, 1952 Because Agroeca gaunitzi still appears as a valid Agroeca gaunitzi was described based on a single nominal species (HELSDINGEN 2009, PLATNICK male from the southern part of Swedish Lapland 2009), a re-study of the holotype was undertaken in (TULLGREN 1952). No additional specimens have order to clarify its identity. As a result, the following since been assigned to this nominal species and it conclusions were reached: was not mentioned in the most recent taxonomical revision of the genus (GRIMM 1986) nor in the 1. The holotype of Agroeca gaunitzi is a male of latest treatment of the family in Sweden (ALM- Agroeca proxima, thus making the former a junior QUIST 2006). synonym, syn. n. According to the original description, A. gau- 2.
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders

    A Summary List of Fossil Spiders

    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
  • Two New Cave-Dwelling Spider Species from the Moroccan High Atlas (Araneae: Liocranidae, Theridiidae)

    Two New Cave-Dwelling Spider Species from the Moroccan High Atlas (Araneae: Liocranidae, Theridiidae)

    Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 60: 12-18 Karlsruhe, September 2020 Two new cave-dwelling spider species from the Moroccan High Atlas (Araneae: Liocranidae, Theridiidae) Sylvain Lecigne, Josiane Lips, Soumia Moutaouakil & Pierre Oger doi: 10.30963/aramit6002 Abstract. During a scientific internship in a mountainous area near Agadir, several caves were prospected; the sampled material includ- ed several spider species. Morphological and taxonomical analysis revealed two new species to science: an anophthalmic troglobiont species, Agraecina agadirensis spec. nov. (description based on three females) and a new member of the genus Steatoda in the Mediter- ranean region, Steatoda ifricola spec. nov. (description based on both sexes). Diagnoses, drawings and photos are presented. Keywords: Agadir, comb-footed spiders, Ida Outanane Massif, spiny-legged sac spiders, taxonomy, troglobiont species Zusammenfassung. Zwei neue höhlenbewohnenden Spinnenarten aus dem marokkanischem Hohen Atlas (Araneae: Liocrani- dae, Theridiidae). Während eines wissenschaftlichen Praktikums im Gebirge nah Agadir wurden mehrere Höhlen besucht. Das dort gesammelte Material enthielt mehrere Spinnenarten. Die morphologische und taxonomische Untersuchung erbrachte zwei neue Arten für die Wissenschaft: eine augenlose troglobionte Art, Agraecina agadirensis spec. nov. (drei Weibchen) und eine neue Vertreterin der Gattung in der mediterranen Region, Steatoda ifricola spec. nov. (beide Geschlechter). Diagnosen, Zeichnungen und Fotos werden prä- sentiert. The araneofauna of Morocco is still only very partially known; triangulosa (Walckenaer, 1802), and in North Africa (S. vena- this is all the more so with respect to cave spiders. The present tor (Audouin, 1826)) (Nentwig et al. 2020, World Spider Cat- work illustrates this and provides the description of two new alog 2020). The genus Steatoda constitutes a group of spiders species for science.
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
  • Zoologica Poloniae

    Zoologica Poloniae

    ZOOLOGICA POLONIAE 2015 VOL. 60 FASC. 1-1 ISSN 0044-510X LUBLIN 2015 ZOOLOGICA POLONIAE ARCHIVUM SOCIETATIS ZOOLOGORUM POLONIAE VOL. 60 FASC. 1-1 2015 LUBLIN 2015 POLAND Zoologica Poloniae in open access http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zoop http://www.umcs.pl/pl/zoologica-poloniae,11696.htm International scientific journal founded by Jarosław Wiącek Zakład Ochrony Przyrody Dept. of Biology and Biotechnology UMCS Lublin © Copyright by Polskie Towarzystwo Zoologiczne Wrocław 2015 ISSN 0044-510X PRINTED IN POLAND Opracowanie do druku: True Colours s.c., ul. I Armii WP 5/2, 20-078 Lublin, www.tcolours.com Nakład: 200 Zdjęcie na pierwszej stronie okładki: fot. M. Piskorski INDEX Łukasz Dawidowicz CONFIRMATION OF THE OCCURRENCE OF THYRIS FENESTRELLA (SCOPOLI, 1763) (LEPIDOPTERA: THYRIDIDAE) IN POLAND AND REMARKS ABOUT ITS BIOLOGY .....5 Grzegorz Gryziak, Grzegorz Makulec BRACHYCHTHONIUS HIRTUS (MORITZ, 1976) AND SUBIASELLA (LALMOPPIA) EUROPAEA (MAHUNKA, 1982) – TWO NEW SPECIES OF ORIBATID MITES (ACARI: ORIBATIDA) TO POLISH FAUNA AND TWO OTHER SPECIES NEW TO THE MAZOVIAN REGION WITHIN POLAND.......................................................................................11 Anna Hirna SPECIMENS OF SPIDER FAUNA FROM UKRAINE IN THE COLLECTION OF THE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, WROCLAW UNIVERSITY (ACCORDING TO THE COLLECTION OF STANISŁAW PILAWSKI AND KAZIMIERZ PETRUSEWICZ) .................15 Katarzyna Wołczuk, Teresa Napiórkowska, Robert Socha ANATOMICAL, HISTOLOGICAL AND HISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF THE ALIMENTARY CANAL OF MONKEY GOBY NEOGOBIUS FLUVIATILIS (Pallas, 1814) ...35 Maciej Filipiuk & Marcin Polak DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT PREFERENCES OF EURASIAN BITTERN BOTAURUS STELLARIS AT NATURAL LAKES OF ŁĘCZNA–WŁODAWA LAKELAND ............................51 Michał Piskorski BAT FAUNA OF THE POLESKI NATIONAL PARK AND SOME ADJOINING AREAS .........65 Zoologica Poloniae (2015) 60/1.
  • Assessing Spider Species Richness and Composition in Mediterranean Cork Oak Forests

    Assessing Spider Species Richness and Composition in Mediterranean Cork Oak Forests

    acta oecologica 33 (2008) 114–127 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actoec Original article Assessing spider species richness and composition in Mediterranean cork oak forests Pedro Cardosoa,b,c,*, Clara Gasparc,d, Luis C. Pereirae, Israel Silvab, Se´rgio S. Henriquese, Ricardo R. da Silvae, Pedro Sousaf aNatural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum and Centre for Macroecology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark bCentre of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Rua Ernesto de Vasconcelos Ed. C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal cAgricultural Sciences Department – CITA-A, University of Azores, Terra-Cha˜, 9701-851 Angra do Heroı´smo, Portugal dBiodiversity and Macroecology Group, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK eDepartment of Biology, University of E´vora, Nu´cleo da Mitra, 7002-554 E´vora, Portugal fCIBIO, Research Centre on Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Oporto, Campus Agra´rio de Vaira˜o, 4485-661 Vaira˜o, Portugal article info abstract Article history: Semi-quantitative sampling protocols have been proposed as the most cost-effective and Received 8 January 2007 comprehensive way of sampling spiders in many regions of the world. In the present study, Accepted 3 October 2007 a balanced sampling design with the same number of samples per day, time of day, collec- Published online 19 November 2007 tor and method, was used to assess the species richness and composition of a Quercus suber woodland in Central Portugal. A total of 475 samples, each corresponding to one hour of Keywords: effective fieldwork, were taken.
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas

    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas

    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
  • Arthropods in Linear Elements

    Arthropods in Linear Elements

    Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis committee Thesis supervisor: Prof. dr. Karlè V. Sýkora Professor of Ecological Construction and Management of Infrastructure Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Thesis co‐supervisor: Dr. ir. André P. Schaffers Scientific researcher Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members: Prof. dr. Dries Bonte Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Hans Van Dyck Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Prof. dr. Paul F.M. Opdam Wageningen University Prof. dr. Menno Schilthuizen University of Groningen This research was conducted under the auspices of SENSE (School for the Socio‐Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Jinze Noordijk Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 3 November 2009 at 1.30 PM in the Aula Noordijk J (2009) Arthropods in linear elements – occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen NL with references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978‐90‐8585‐492‐0 C’est une prairie au petit jour, quelque part sur la Terre. Caché sous cette prairie s’étend un monde démesuré, grand comme une planète. Les herbes folles s’y transforment en jungles impénétrables, les cailloux deviennent montagnes et le plus modeste trou d’eau prend les dimensions d’un océan. Nuridsany C & Pérennou M 1996.
  • Through Arthropod Eyes Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Calcareous Grassland Diversity

    Through Arthropod Eyes Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Calcareous Grassland Diversity

    Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Toos van Noordwijk Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Van Noordwijk, C.G.E. 2014. Through arthropod eyes. Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Keywords: Biodiversity, chalk grassland, dispersal tactics, conservation management, ecosystem restoration, fragmentation, grazing, insect conservation, life‑history strategies, traits. ©2014, C.G.E. van Noordwijk ISBN: 978‑90‑77522‑06‑6 Printed by: Gildeprint ‑ Enschede Lay‑out: A.M. Antheunisse Cover photos: Aart Noordam (Bijenwolf, Philanthus triangulum) Toos van Noordwijk (Laamhei) The research presented in this thesis was financially spupported by and carried out at: 1) Bargerveen Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2) Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3) Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Belgium. The research was in part commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation as part of the O+BN program (Development and Management of Nature Quality). Financial support from Radboud University for printing this thesis is gratefully acknowledged. Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann volgens besluit van het college van decanen en ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de biologie aan de Universiteit Gent op gezag van de rector prof. dr. Anne De Paepe, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 26 augustus 2014 om 10.30 uur precies door Catharina Gesina Elisabeth van Noordwijk geboren op 9 februari 1981 te Smithtown, USA Promotoren: Prof.
  • The Structure of Spider Communities in Limestone Quarry Environments

    The Structure of Spider Communities in Limestone Quarry Environments

    1998. P. A. Selden (ed.). Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997. The structure of spider communities in limestone quarry environments James R. Bell, W. Rod Cullen and C. Philip Wheater Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK Summary Upland limestone spider communities have not been extensively studied. Spiders of three habitats— a natural daleside, naturally regenerated disused quarries, and quarry faces which have undergone landform replication—have been investigated using pitfall traps as part of a long-term monitoring programme. Catch data of 2055 individuals, representing 77 species from 12 families, is presented for the years 1992 and 1995. No relationship was found between the number of spider species and individuals and the age of the sites. Changes in the species composition were evident between 1992 and 1995. These tended to be greatest for recently disturbed sites and smallest for mature natural daleside habitats. This may be attributed to survival of a population and weather-mediated differ- ences in immigration from surrounding habitats. Additionally, the availablitity of overwintering habitat such as large rocks and moss may explain differences between some sites. Three families were found to be dominant across the sites: Linyphiidae, Lycosidae and Agelenidae, with five species making up 49.5 % of the sample. The autecology of these species is discussed in relation to their distribution. Introduction we present data on the effect of quarrying on spiders and the response of these communities to In Britain, upland spider communities can be severe habitat disturbance. found west of the Tees–Exe line between 300–1300 m where the physical conditions are often harsh due to an extremely variable climate, Study sites steep unstable slopes and thin soils (Ratcliffe, 1977).
  • Arachnides 88

    Arachnides 88

    ARACHNIDES BULLETIN DE TERRARIOPHILIE ET DE RECHERCHES DE L’A.P.C.I. (Association Pour la Connaissance des Invertébrés) 88 2019 Arachnides, 2019, 88 NOUVEAUX TAXA DE SCORPIONS POUR 2018 G. DUPRE Nouveaux genres et nouvelles espèces. BOTHRIURIDAE (5 espèces nouvelles) Brachistosternus gayi Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Chili) Brachistosternus philippii Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Chili) Brachistosternus misti Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) Brachistosternus contisuyu Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) Brachistosternus anandrovestigia Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018 (Pérou) BUTHIDAE (2 genres nouveaux, 41 espèces nouvelles) Anomalobuthus krivotchatskyi Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Ouzbékistan, Kazakhstan) Anomalobuthus lowei Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Kazakhstan) Anomalobuthus pavlovskyi Teruel, Kovarik & Fet, 2018 (Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan) Ananteris kalina Ythier, 2018b (Guyane) Barbaracurus Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a Barbaracurus winklerorum Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a (Oman) Barbaracurus yemenensis Kovarik, Lowe & St'ahlavsky, 2018a (Yémen) Butheolus harrisoni Lowe, 2018 (Oman) Buthus boussaadi Lourenço, Chichi & Sadine, 2018 (Algérie) Compsobuthus air Lourenço & Rossi, 2018 (Niger) Compsobuthus maidensis Kovarik, 2018b (Somaliland) Gint childsi Kovarik, 2018c (Kénya) Gint amoudensis Kovarik, Lowe, Just, Awale, Elmi & St'ahlavsky, 2018 (Somaliland) Gint gubanensis Kovarik, Lowe, Just, Awale, Elmi & St'ahlavsky,