Punternet UK Review of Yumi of Luton
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
(załącznik 1/appendix 1) Łódź, data/date 26/05/17 Imię i nazwisko/First name(s) and surname: Rosa Marina Senent Julián Nr albumu/Student identification number: E-2826 Specjalność/Field of specialisation: Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies (GEMMA Programme) Wydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politologicznych/ /Faculty of International and Political Studies Uniwersytet Łódzki/University of Łódź (wesja polska/Polish version) Oświadczenie Oświadczam, że złożona przeze mnie praca magisterska, kończąca studia pt.: “He who pays the piper calls the tune: masculinity and sex purchase online – a critical discourse analysis” jest moim samodzielnym opracowaniem. Oznacza to, że nie zlecałem/am opracowania rozprawy lub jej części innym osobom, ani nie odpisywałem/am tej rozprawy lub jej części z prac innych osób. (wesja angielska/English version) Declaration I hereby declare that my Master’s thesis submitted upon completion of the studies, entitled “He who pays the piper calls the tune: masculinity and sex purchase online – a critical discourse analysis” is my own work written unaided. This means that I have not had it or any of its parts written by a third party, and I have not copied it or any of its parts from anyone else’s work. (podpis/signature) (załącznik 2/appendix 2) Łódź, data/date 26/05/17 Imię i nazwisko/First name(s) and surname: Rosa Marina Senent Julián Nr albumu/Student identification number: E-2826 Specjalność/Field of specialisation: Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies (GEMMA Programme) Wydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politologicznych/ /Faculty of International and Political Studies Uniwersytet Łódzki/University of Łódź (wesja polska/Polish version) Oświadczenie Wyrażam zgodę / nie wyrażam zgody na udostępnienie mojej pracy magisterskiej pt.: “He who pays the piper calls the tune: masculinity and sex purchase online – a critical discourse analysis” (wesja angielska/English version) Declaration I hereby grant consent that my Master’s thesis entitled entitled “He who pays the piper calls the tune: masculinity and sex purchase online – a critical discourse analysis” be made available1. (podpis/signature) 1 For consultations in the faculty library. (załącznik 3/appendix 3) Łódź, data/date 26/05/2017 Imię i nazwisko/First name(s) and surname: Rosa Marina Senent Julián Nr albumu/Student identification number: E-2826 Specjalność/Field of specialisation: Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies (GEMMA Programme) Wydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politologicznych/ /Faculty of International and Political Studies Uniwersytet Łódzki/University of Łódź (wesja polska/Polish version) Oświadczenie Zaświadczam o zgodności zawartości danych na nośniku elektronicznym z przedstawionym wydrukiem pracy magisterskiej. (wesja angielska/English version) Declaration I hereby declare that the digital version of my Master’s thesis is an unaltered copy of the printed version. (podpis/signature) (załącznik 4/appendix 4) Łódź, date/date 26/05/2017 Imię i nazwisko promotora/Name of the supervisor: María del Carmen Pérez Riu - Universidad de Oviedo (main supervisor) and Marek Wojtaszek - University of Łódź (support supervisor) (wesja polska/Polish version) Oświadczenie Oświadczam, że złożona przez Panią Rosa Marina Senent Julián praca magisterska, kończąca studia pt.: “He who pays the piper calls the tune: masculinity and sex purchase online – a critical discourse analysis” spełnia wymagania kierunkowe dotyczące prac oraz egzaminów magisterskich na Wydziale Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politologicznych Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego i została przeze mnie przyjęta jako praca zaliczająca seminarium magisterskie. (wesja angielska/English version) Declaration I hereby declare that the master’s thesis submitted by Ms. Rosa Marina Senent Julián upon completion of the studies, entitled: “He who pays the piper calls the tune: masculinity and sex purchase online – a critical discourse analysis”, abides by the official requirements in regard to Master’s theses and exams established by the Faculty of International and Political Studies, University of Łódź, and has been accepted by me as an assignment for the Master’s seminar. (podpis promotora/supervisor’s signature) Acknowledgements I would like to thank all the people that have been present in my life during the writing of this project. Thanks to mia mamma, mia sorella, my espouse, my sister-in-law, Estefania, Nuria, Marcela, Leyre, Marta, Luisa and Asma for their love and support, particularly in moments of emotional distress. Thanks also to the guidance of both Carmen and Marek, and to the members of Cafeminista for keeping the bubble alive. Special thanks to Anna and Marcela, for the productive debates, to Pepín for being a role model and to my Ca Beleño family for welcoming me and for being a constant source of joy and happiness. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1-3 1 THE PROBLEM OF PROSTITUTION .........................................................................................4-7 1.1 CURRENT FEMINIST DEBATES ..............................................................................7-12 1.2 LEGAL STATUS .................................................................................................12-14 1.3 PROSTITUTION AS A GENDERED PHENOMENON ....................................................16-20 2 METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................................................21 2.1 LANGUAGE AND DISCOURSE .............................................................................22-23 2.2 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POWER AND DISCOURSE ........................................23-24 2.3 APPLIED METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................24-26 2.4 FIELD-WORK PROCEDURE .................................................................................26-28 2.5 A NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY ................................................................................28-31 3 WEBSITE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................32 3.1 DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................33 3.1.1 DIRECTORY ................................................................................................33-37 3.1.2 ANNOUNCEMENTS CALENDAR ....................................................................37-39 3.1.3 REVIEWS ...................................................................................................39-41 3.1.4 MY ACCOUNT ............................................................................................41-42 3.1.5 CONTACT ...................................................................................................42-43 3.1.6 ADVERTISING INFO ....................................................................................44-47 3.1.7 LINKS ....................................................................................................... 47-48 3.1.8 A NOTE ON LEGISLATION ............................................................................48-49 3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE REVIEWS ..............................................................................49-50 3.2.1 INFORMATION GIVEN ABOUT THE WOMEN ....................................................50-60 3.2.2 INFORMATION GIVEN ABOUT THEMSELVES ...................................................60-63 3.2.3 THE POSITIVE REVIEWS .................................................................................63 3.2.3.1 DEFINING A “GOOD SERVICE”, OR PUSHING HER LIMITS ..........................63-65 3.2.3.2 BEING PROFESSIONAL AS BEING SERVICEABLE .......................................65-69 3.2.3.3 THE “TRUE WHORE”: THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE IDEAL PROSTITUTE .....69-73 3.2.3.4 FEMALE (LACK OF) PLEASURE WITHIN THE PROSTITUTION CONTRACT ......73-78 3.2.4 THE NEGATIVE REVIEWS ................................................................................78 3.2.4.1 DEFINING A “BAD SERVICE”: THE MONEY FACTOR ..................................78-80 3.2.4.2 BOUNDARIES AND DISSOCIATION ...........................................................81-87 3.2.4.3 “BASIC SERVICES” AS A FORM OF VIOLENCE AND A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE 87-91 3.2.4.4 VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND SUSPICION OF EXPLOITATION ...............91-95 4 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................95-104 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................105-115 APPENDIX A .................................................................................................................116-128 APPENDIX B ........................................................................................................................129 Introduction The prostitute has always been under society's surveillance. Treated as a social outcast or a moral perverse, she has walked alone through centuries of human knowledge. Who are those women? Why are they prostitutes? These and similar questions have inspired innumerable answers that have fed the idea that prostitutes compound a separate class of women. They have been studied as voiceless figures who can be rightly attacked or marginalised by the “respectable” members of society.