Bill Brown (Surveillance Camera Players)

Interview: Bill Brown (Surveillance Camera Players) Extraido de ZEMOS98 http://www.zemos98.org Interview: Bill Brown (Surveillance Camera Players) - English - Publicado el Miércoles 28 de noviembre de 2007 ZEMOS98 Creative Commons BY 2.5 EspañaZEMOS98 Página 1/6 Interview: Bill Brown (Surveillance Camera Players) Rubén Díaz: Does Room 101 exist? Bill Brown: Yes, its inside of our minds. 147. To start with, there are the techniques of surveillance. Hidden video cameras are now used in most stores and in many other places, computers are used to collect and process vast amounts of information about individuals. Information so obtained greatly increases the effectiveness of physical coercion (i.e., law enforcement). Then there are the methods of propaganda, for which the mass communication media provide effective vehicles. Efficient techniques have been developed for winning elections, selling products, influencing public opinion. The entertainment industry serves as an important psychological tool of the system, possibly even when it is dishing out large amounts of sex and violence. Entertainment provides modern man with an essential means of escape. While absorbed in television, videos, etc., he can forget stress, anxiety, frustration, dissatisfaction. Many primitive peoples, when they don't have work to do, are quite content to sit for hours at a time doing nothing at all, because they are at peace with themselves and their world. But most modern people must be constantly occupied or entertained, otherwise the get "bored," i.e., they get fidgety, uneasy, irritable. This is point 147 of The Unabomber Manifesto (1). The economist Steven D. Levitt tells the story of a white boy whose "parents read widely and involve themselves in school reform. His father, who has a decent manufacturing job, often takes the boy on nature hikes. His mother is a housewife who will eventually go back to collage and earn a bachelors degree in education. The boy is happy and performs very well in school. His teachers think he may be a bona fide math genius. Hs parents encourage him and are terribly proud when he skips a grade. He has an adoring younger brother who is also very bright. The family even holds literary salons in their home (2). Levitt uses this story to contrast with that of a black boy with family problems, abandoned by his mother, beaten by his father and with a criminal history. The white boy and the black boy both make it to Harvard. The black boy is now a prestigious economist working on radical issues: Roland G. Fryer Jr. The one who "things went wrong for", according to Levitt, was the white boy: Theodore John Kaczynski. Kaczynski was a mathematics professor at the University of California. In the seventies, he distanced himself from the madding crowd, and between 1978 and 1995 he placed 16 bombs and became the most wanted man in the United States of America. The FBI is said to have interrogated 10,000 suspects and spent 50 million dollars in an attempt to arrest him, with little success. His direct rejection of the technological-industrial system led him to attack the economic and technological bases of today's society. His letter-bombs targeted at universities (Un) and airlines ( United Airlines) led him to be dubbed the Unabomber". After several years of activity, he sent a press release to the New York Times claiming that the bombs had been placed by The Freedom Club, a group of anti-technology anarchists. If the newspaper published their manifesto, they would stop their attacks. The New York Times accepted and published The Unabomber Manifesto. It was to spell the end for Kaczynski. The "adorable younger brother who is also very bright", David Kaczynski, recognised Theodores writing style, comparing some of the paragraphs that appeared in the New York Times with letters his mother had received, and reported him to the FBI. David received the million dollar reward that had been offered for true clues to the Unabombers possible whereabouts. He gave half of the money away to the families of the victims. I imagine he is enjoying the other half now. On the 3rd of April 1996, the FBI arrested Theodore Kaczynski in his cabin in the Montana mountains (3). We began in November 1996 as a kind of follow-up to the Unabomber for President campaign, which was a prank intended to ridicule the elections of "representatives" here in America. So says Bill Brown, co-founding member of the New York Collective Surveillance Camera Players and the real subject of this text. Its true that before and during Theodore Kaczynski's arrest and trial, a phantom - or an ironic campaign - appeared, supporting the Unabomber as a candidate for the United States Presidency. Unabomber for president graffiti appeared on university campuses (4), and public figures like the North American anarchist and primitivist John Zerzan became famous for supporting the Unabomber. Creative Commons BY 2.5 EspañaZEMOS98 Página 2/6 Interview: Bill Brown (Surveillance Camera Players) The Surveillance Camera Players came into being from two groups of activist friends, one of them centred around Michael Carter, author of Manifesto for the Guerrilla Re-programming of Video Surveillance Equipment (1995) and the other around Bill Brown. Once this campaign ended, we were left with nothing to do. And so, from out of our midst came the next big idea: that is, the idea of founding a group called "Surveillance Camera Players," based on the Manifesto for the Guerrilla Re-programming of Video Surveillance Equipment, which had been written and distributed in Nova Scotia in 1995. Our first performance was on 10 December 1996: it consisted of performing a silent adaptation of Alfred Jarry's Ubu Roi in front of police surveillance cameras in a subway station in Manhattan. The police came and prevented us from finishing: success!. This interview should have taken place in person. I arranged for Bill Brown to come to Sevilla and organise one of the walking tours he's been doing for years in New York and other cities in the US (Portland, Chicago, Boston and Cincinnati) and Europe (Graz, Leipzig, Leeds and Barcelona). We also wanted him to do a workshop as part of the project Panel de Control. Interruptores críticos para una sociedad vigilada, for the ninth year of ZEMOS98. Unfortunately, shortly after he had confirmed that he would come, he had to cancel the trip because legal problems prevented him from leaving the country. I was too polite to ask him what those legal problems were, but I was curious to know. And finally the interview took place by email. Surveillance Camera Players (SCP) is a collective that defends the idea that the systems use of video surveillance cameras violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution) So they position themselves directly against their use. They declare their position by carrying out related and/or adapted versions of plays, which they perform directly in front of the lens of a video surveillance camera. They use their own visibility - interviews in the media or on their own web site, hosted by notbored ( http://www.notbored.org/the-scp.html) to protest against the fact that anyone who is against being watched by an unknown gaze is automatically suspected - or guilty - of something. They point with their finger at video surveillance devices in public, making them clearly visible. Bill Brown and his fellow SCP members act in front of the surveillance cameras, raising themselves to perform their pantomimes and holding up their hand-lettered signs. It is essential to use written text, as closed circuit TV doesnt usually record sound. Although SCP activities started in 1996 with Ubu Roi, the collective was inactive until 1998, when they performed an adapted version of George Orwells 1984 in front of the cameras in the New York Metro. This was the piece chosen by Fundación Rodríguez and ZEMOS98 to represent the collective's work in Panel de Control. From then until 2001 was a specially active and productive period for the SCP, with more than 50 people performing with the group (over 75% women), all defining themselves politically as anarchists and heirs to the Situationist International. The SCP intends to protest the use of surveillance cameras in public places, and to unify art and politics in a novel mixture. In this effort, our primary inspiration are the scandals caused by the Situationist International, explains Bill Brown. The SCPs mission is basically to point out video surveillance cameras and make them visible, seeing as many of Creative Commons BY 2.5 EspañaZEMOS98 Página 3/6 Interview: Bill Brown (Surveillance Camera Players) them go unnoticed because they are either not properly signposted or simply camouflaged as part of street furniture. We make maps to make the cameras visible: too many of them do not look like cameras (instead, they look like lights, or ornaments) and almost all of them are not accompanied by signs that say Warning: you are being watched. But we also make these maps to show the power of simple means: the cameras are spotted by the "naked eye" (no sensors, locators, etc) and the maps are hand-made (pen and pad). And yet they produce a powerful effect: concerns that we are "helping" terrorists and criminals, who don't know where the cameras are, and that (paradoxically) we are also helping the police and secret services, who also do not know where the cameras are! Finally, we make the maps to help people really see the cities in which they live.

Load more