Mr Robert Chambers Read the Following Letter from Mr William Fraser

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mr Robert Chambers Read the Following Letter from Mr William Fraser II. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTICE REGARDIN E DUKE ENTRTH F GTH O E F YO YORK'S NAME IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL RECORD, JULY 1685. [See p. 90.] r RoberM t Chambers rea followine dth g letter fro r WilliamM m Fraser, assistant-keeper of the Register of Sasines, adducing addi- tional evidence from original letters written by the Duke of York, from England time th et a whe,s enterestyls i hi e s pre nh ea y b d- sittinge Prive senth th t a tf y so Counci Scotlandn i l questioe Th . n as to the fact itself is thus set at rest; but much doubt may still be entertained as to the reason, or whether there was any reason be- yond mistake, for the entering of the Duke's style in the minutes. " GENERAL REGISTER HOUSE, 25t!i May 1855. " MY DEAR SIR,—From the interest which you have taken in the question touching the evidence of the Duke of York having sat in the Privy Council at Edinburg Juln i h y 1684 I kno , wilu glae wb heayo o ldt r tha I havt e found counter evidence which resolves the question in the negative. " In the Privy Council Records, the Duke is entered in the ' sederunts,' or lis councillorf o t s present 15the th ,n o 17th, , 22d24td an ,h July. "But ther e extan lettersar eo tw t , holograp Dukee th f ho , addressee th o dt Lord Treasurer, who was one of his confidential correspondents on Scotch affairs, which show that he could not have been present at any of the four meet- ings. The first of these letters is dated the 22d of July, being the third day on whic Duke hth enteres ei sederuntse th t datebearn e i di b d o dst an , from Tun- Iridge. Of course, the Duke could not have been there and in Edinburgh on the very same day, " But, independentl place dateth d subject-mattee f ean yo th , lettee th s f ri o r equally decisive that he was not present on the 15th when the Earl of Perth was inaugurated as Chancellor. The letter acknowledges receipt of one from the Lord Treasurer, dated 15th July, ' by which' (says the Duke) ' I am very ANTIQUARIE9 11 SCOTLANDF O S . glad to find that most of the loyal men are pleased at Lord Perth's being made Chancellor. I have not yett seen what passed at the Secret Comitty, but be- liev eshalI Londonn li whem a nI , wher I eintento-morrow e b o dt I cam. e yesterday from Windsor, and when I return back thether, which I intend on Thursday, shall answer more particularly your Letter.' " The Duke was thus receiving in England accounts of what was passing in the Privy Council at Edinburgh from his official and confidential correspondents there. If he had been personally present to hear and see what was transacted Counciln i recorde th s a , s erroneousl havyo t beaem beenrhi t wasi , f courseo , , altogether unnecessary to inform him of the proceedings by letter. " The second letter is dated at Windsor on the 25th. The Duke acknow- ledges receipt of a letter from the Lord Treasurer, dated the 17th, and two from e Secreth t Committee e expresseH . s his satisfaction thaTreasuree th t d rha ' made so good an understanding between the Chancellor and M : Atholl. 'Tis vera y good servic King.e th o et ' " There is a third letter, which is dated at Windsor, August 5, 1684, in which the Duke says I fin your' y , db s tha Boote dond th t gooo sha en d upon Spence, and believe him so stuborne he will not owne what he knows.' Poor Spence was the Earl of Argyle's servant, who suffered repeated and inhuman torture, first by the boots, and then by Dalziel's experiment of the thumbikins, and a hair shirt. " Fro intimatioe mth n containe firse movementth e t th n letted i o t e s ra th f so Duke from day to day, he appears to have been either in London or at Wind- t necessar t whica no s x i f thes fi h t o place i o o yt 24tht e e tw e th Bu ssoh n . o r actually was. Findint Windsoa 25te m th hghi n ro preclude e possibilitth s y beins ohi f Edinburgn gi previoue th n ho s day. " At the late meeting of the Society of Antiquaries, where the question was raised by you, I expressed an opinion that the records should be taken as good legal evidence of the Duke having been present in Council until they were con- tradicted by better evidence of an alibi. I had not previously investigated the wayy matte I certainlyan . n i r , however, expected thainvestigatioy an t n which might be made would corroborate the records. My leanings were all in favoue accurac th e recordsf o th r f yo ; but common ,i n candou fairnesd ran o t s boun now confes dto you am I ,s that, instea beindof g corroborated recordthe , s appea contradictee b o rt lettere th y dsb unde Duke'e rth hand n sow , whice ar h the best of all evidence, and that the view which you and Mr Macaulay enter- tained is fully established. " The letters from the Duke of York to which I have referred are in the Charter e DukChesth f Buccleucf o eo t Quoensberryd an hrepree th s i - o wh , 120 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF sentativ e Lorth f deo Treasurer whoo t , m they were addressed, whic thus hi s propee th r legal custody. They have been examine wite m hy mucdb h caret a , the sight, and with the assistance of a gentleman of great accuracy, who has the more immediate charge of them, and you may rely upon their being correctly quoted. erron "A r being thus tracePrive th o ydt Counci s thea l Recordsr y fa o s n i , shew the Duke of York in the sederunt of Councillors, the next inquiry should be for an explanation of such a startling mistake. This point I have not yet had an opportunity of investigating. I remain, my dear Sir, yours very faithfully, " WM. FBASBB. " ROBEKT CHAMBERS, Esq." e discussioth n I n which took plac referencn ei thio et s subject. Mr Joseph Eobertson of the General Register House made a com- munication whicf o , followine hth substance th s gi e :— That the Duke of York was not present in person at the meetings of the Privy Counci t Edinburgha l Juln ,i y sufficientl w 1684no s i , y certainsilence th f f I eo . contemporary annalists, and his own letters to the Marquis of Queensberry, left any room for doubt, it would be excluded by other evidence. Thus, on one of the days (the 22d of July) on which "his Royal Highness his Majesties High Commissioner s representei " s beina d g in attendance well-knowe th , n Patrick Walker was ordered by the Council to be put to the torture for refusing to dis- close the names of those who were present with him at the murder of one of Lord Airlie's troopers. 1 The Cameronian martyrologist himself narrates the circumstance whild s ;an name2e eh Archbishoe sth t AndrewS f po d Lor an s d Tarbet, he says not a word of the Duke of York, although the glory of confrontin defyind an g g that " sworn vassa f Antichristo l lase th t s thini " g that the vain, garrulous, old pedlar would have failed to commemorate. So, e 29tagain th f July—onl ho n o , y five days aftelase th rt appearance th f eo Duke's name in the list of the Privy Councillors—we find the Lord Primate of Scotland writing to his English brother of Canterbury requesting him to inform his Royal Highness of the complexion of Scottish affairs, in terms which utterly preclud suppositioe eth midse beed nth thef thaha n no ti e mh t within less than a week.3 1 Registrum Secreti Conoilii, Acta 1682-1685, p. 418. MS. General Register House. Th et carrie addede sentenceno b s y dwa , ma int t i ,o execution. 9 Biographia Presbyteriana, vol. i., p. 307. 3 Dr Clarke's Letter Scottisf so h Prelates . 64Edinburgh65 ,pp , , 1848. ANTIQUARIE1 12 SCOTLANDF SO . summee th n i f 168t o r no 4 s Bu i onl t i t y tha Duke name th th t Yor f f eeo o k is entere role f statesmeth o l n di n deliberatin Scottise th n gi h capita tima t a le when he was unquestionably not in Scotland. Marchf o 21se agaih d th Marcf 9t tan o , n e e n1682n o I th th ht n a o ,(bu t no t intermediate meeting of the 16th of March), " His Royall Highness his Majes- ties High Commissioner" figures at the head of the " sederunt" of the Privy Council at Edinburgh.1 Yet nothing can be more certain than that on neither of these days was his foot upon Scottish ground. It can be shown by the amplest and most conclusive proofs that he left Scotland on the 6th of March, and did not return until the 7th of May. Sir John Lauder, writing on the spot, and at the moment, notes in his jour- nal ,Marcf thao h th 6t "o 1681-2e nth Duke th , f Albaneo y shippe t Leitda h for London."2 The next day, on the 7th of March, we have the Bishop of Edin- burgh writing from tha Archbishoe t th cit o yt f Canterburypo , thats "Hi Royall Highnes being calle Kine waio dth t t Newmarkett..gn a o t partes i .
Recommended publications
  • 126613688.23.Pdf
    Sts. SHV lift ,*2f SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY FOURTH SERIES VOLUME 12 Calendar of Papal Letters to Scotland of Clement VII of Avignon 1378-1394 Dr. Annie I. Dunlop CALENDAR OF Papal Letters to Scotland of Clement VII of Avignon 1378-1394 edited by Charles Burns ★ Annie I. Dunlop (1897-1973): a Memoir by Ian B. Cowan EDINBURGH printed for the Scottish History Society by T. AND A. CONSTABLE LTD 1976 Scottish History Society 1976 SIO^MY^ c 19 77 ,5 ISBN 9500260 8 5 Printed in Great Britain PREFACE The Great Schism, which originated in a disputed papal election, has always been regarded as one of the most crucial periods in the history of western Christendom, and to this day that election remains the greatest unresolved controversy of the later Middle Ages. The stand taken by the Scottish nation throughout the Schism was particu- larly significant, yet, until recently, Scottish historians had explored only inadequately the original sources existing in the Vatican Archives. During the academic year 1961-2, the University of Glasgow awarded me a research scholarship with the specific aim of examining the letter-books, or registers, of one of the rival popes, and of noting systematically all the entries concerning Scotland. A microfilm of this source material is deposited with the Department of Scottish History. This project was instrumental in introducing me to the late Dr Annie I. Dunlop. It won her immediate and enthusiastic approval and she followed its progress with lively interest. Only a few months before her death, Dr Dunlop asked me, if I was still working hard for Scotland ! This Calendar of Papal Letters of Clement vn of Avignon relating to Scotland is the result of that work.
    [Show full text]
  • July 1916 Part 1
    The Scottish Historical Review VOL. XIIL, No. 52 JULY 1916 A Chapter Election at St. Andrews in 1417 Formulare compiled by John Lauder, who was secretary to THEAndrew Forman, Archbishop of St. Andrews, served for a time under Gavin Dunbar, Archbishop of Glasgow, became chief secretary to Cardinal Beaton, and ended his career under Archbishop Hamilton about 1552, contains almost exclusively contemporary documents. It is well known that in this volume the University of St. Andrews possesses a document of unique value for students of Scottish history on the eve of the Refor- mation. But in the course of his practice Lauder came across a few writs belonging to an earlier period which interested him, and which he took the trouble to incorporate. One of these, entered at folio 267, purports to be the instrument drawn up on the election of James de Haddenstoun to the Priory of St. Andrews. The compiler of a book of styles was not thinking of the historian as he wrote. Consequently there is an irritating absence of names and dates occasional inadvertence but except by ; very frequently the initials at least are preserved, and the persons are not difficult to identify. In the present instance there is no reason to doubt that we have the copy of a genuine document belonging to the early part of the fifteenth century, just when Scotland was ques- tioning the allegiance which she had maintained to the anti-Pope Benedict XIIL that be The writ is a long one, and the Latin prolix. All can attempted here is by close paraphrase and occasional translation to give the reader an idea of the proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Early History of the Kidston Family in Scotland
    NOTES ON THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE KIDSTON FAMILY IN SCOTLAND By: Robert D. Davic, Ph.D.; [email protected]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA; (March 17, 2015 revision) ===================================================================================== INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of notes my wife and I have gathered about the early history of her Kidston family ancestry from Scotland. My wife, Elizabeth Kidston Davic (b. 1951, m. 1974) was born in the U.S.A. in western Pennsylvania, second child of Richard Kidston and Gladys Thomas. She always knew that both of her father’s grandparents came from Scotland, but had few details. After retirement, and with more time to get involved with her Kidston ancestry, she obtained information about her grandfather’s family and made a visit to his home town of Glasglow. She became aware of a remarkable document written by a distant cousin, John Kidston Tait (b. 1924, d. 2013), that gave a detailed record of her Scottish ancestry back to her 12th great grandfather, John Kydstoun of Logie parish, Sterlingshire (Tait, 1995: The Kidstons’ of Logie; 1995 edition, 20 Chapters, 4 Addendum). Information provided by Mr. Tait revealed that the Kidston family name had a much older presence at the town of Peebles located in the lowland county of Peeblesshire. Seen today on road maps of Peebles are the place locations Upper Kidston, Nether Kidston, Kidston Mill, Kidston Burn (a stream), and Kidston Bank Woods. Expecting to find some Kidston relatives living at Peebles to contact for information about family history, you can imagine our surprise when we learned that no Kidstons’ have lived at Peebles for more than 700 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Auldhame, Tyninghame, and Whitekirk in East Lothian
    BE I NG A H ISTO RY O F AULDHAME TYNINGHAME AND WHITEKIRK , , IN EAST LOTHIAN FR N RE 1 1 —1 OM S E S S I O CORD S , 6 5 850 ’ w fl s . h . a u ; A p. v a " r d I —5 mmn. M I N I S T E R O F T H E U N I T E D P A RI S H ; ‘ ’ A UT HO R O F T H E GO S P E L O F T H E K I N GD O M WI L L I A M B L A C K W O O D A N D S O N S E D I N B U R G H A N D ~ L O N D O N M D C C C X C I I I /X 7 3 A ll Rzg/z ts r eser ved 1512 58 4 P R E FA E C . TH I S b ook has b e e n writte n fo r the sake of the and e e of S o the past, from a s ns duty . much in history of parish church e s in S cotland has b e e n and so a e e e ave lost, m ny r lics in th ir poss ssion h a e e ou a e e e e a dis pp ar d , thr gh c r l ssn ss in form r d ys , that it would b e a pity if m ore anywh e re should b I t e e the t f a e lost .
    [Show full text]
  • George Wishart: a Torch of the Reformation in Scotland1
    21 George Wishart: a Torch of the Reformation in Scotland1 I am led to attempt a paper on George Wishart, partly because of a family connection which I refer to later in this paper, and partly by an interest in two questions: firstly, why would a man die (or perhaps more accurately put himself in a position of risk of death) over what appear to modern eyes, relatively small points of religious doctrine; secondly, why would those in authority think it worth killing him over those same points? The first question is answered readily enough. In a time when religious questions were to some, perhaps a relatively small part of the community, the most important thing in life, and when salvation for eternity is seen as the object, death may be actively pursued in that cause and certainly risked. It is of course also possible that for many there is a certain tinge of egotism in the heroism of martyrs: ... they never fail who die in a great cause: their gore may soak the block, There may sodden in the sun, their limbs Be strung to city gates and castle walls. But still their spirit walks abroad. Though years Elapse, and other share as dark a doom, They but augment the deep and sweeping thoughts Which overpower all others, and conduct The world at last to freedom.2 The second question is I think much harder. The explanation in part of course is the same in that there were certainly some in the established church who felt sufficiently strongly about these relatively small questions of doctrine to risk their own lives and therefore thought relatively little of taking the lives of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies the Patrick Gordon Diary and Its
    Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Volume 3: Issue 2 The Patrick Gordon Diary And Its Context AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies, University of Aberdeen JOURNAL OF IRISH AND SCOTTISH STUDIES Volume 3, Issue 2 Spring 2010 The Patrick Gordon Diary And Its Context Published by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen in association with The universities of the The Irish-Scottish Academic Initiative ISSN 1753-2396 Printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies General Editor: Cairns Craig Issue Editor: Paul Dukes Associate Editor: Michael Brown Editorial Advisory Board: Fran Brearton, Queen’s University, Belfast Eleanor Bell, University of Strathclyde Ewen Cameron, University of Edinburgh Sean Connolly, Queen’s University, Belfast Patrick Crotty, University of Aberdeen David Dickson, Trinity College, Dublin T. M. Devine, University of Edinburgh David Dumville, University of Aberdeen Aaron Kelly, University of Edinburgh Edna Longley, Queen’s University, Belfast Peter Mackay, Queen’s University, Belfast Shane Alcobia-Murphy, University of Aberdeen Ian Campbell Ross, Trinity College, Dublin Graham Walker, Queen’s University, Belfast International Advisory Board: Don Akenson, Queen’s University, Kingston Tom Brooking, University of Otago Keith Dixon, Université Lumière Lyon 2 Luke Gibbons, Notre Dame Marjorie Howes, Boston College H. Gustav Klaus, University of Rostock Peter Kuch, University of Otago Graeme Morton, University of Guelph Brad Patterson, Victoria University, Wellington Matthew Wickman, Brigham Young David Wilson, University of Toronto The Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies is a peer reviewed journal published twice yearly in autumn and spring by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow's Healthier Future Forum 16
    Glasgow’s Healthier Future Forum 16 Exploring perspectives on active travel Tuesday 31st March 2015 St Andrew’s in the Square This report is a summary of the presentations and discussions from the GHFF16 event and does not necessarily represent the views of the GCPH Introduction The 16th Healthier Future Forum focused on active travel and physical activity within an urban environment. Active travel is an important cross-cutting issue which is relevant to policy on health improvement, air quality, sustainability and climate change, and also to how our cities develop in the 21st century. Alasdair MacDonald, Sustrans, chaired the event, which opened with an address from Maureen Watt, Minister for Public Health at the Scottish Government. A keynote address followed from John Lauder, Director, Sustrans and a presentation from Bruce Whyte, Glasgow Centre for Population Health. The latter part of the morning included pop-up presentations, round table discussion and feedback to allow the opportunity for further comment and more in-depth discussion. Duncan Booker, Sustainable Glasgow, gave a concluding speech at the end of the morning. Acknowledgements Thank you to all the plenary speakers (see above) and to all those who gave pop-up presentations – Graham Baker, Edinburgh University; Suzanne Forup, Play on Pedals; Alex Bottrill & Anna Ronayne, Sustrans; Joanna Smith, The Bike Station; Deborah Shipton, NHS Health Scotland (formerly Glasgow Centre for Population Health); Gregor Yates, Glasgow Centre for Population Health and Victoria Leiper, The Bike Station. Thank you also to Carol Frame for her work in organising this event, to Sheena Fletcher who was in charge of social media activity and Kelda Mclean for taking photos throughout the morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    54 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, DECEMBER U, 1885. y. EARLY NOTICE E BAS S OWNERSTH SIT F BOCSO D Y AN KB . JOHN J. REID, B.A., F.S.A. SOOT. (PLATE!.) It is not surprising that the Bass Rock, which from so many points in Lothiane th s form conspicuoua s s objece viewth n i ,t should have been at a very early period selected as an abode by one of the numerous hermits of that Christianity which came to us from the west. It is recorded by Boece (Bellenden's edition, i. 37; cf, also The Breviary of Aberdeen), o wrotwh esixteente earlth n yi h century, tha t BaldreS t d lived a solitary life upon the rock, and died there in 606 A.D., much as St Cuthbert lived and died upon one of the Fame Islands off the Northumbrian coast, some eighty years later, or as St Adrian, who, to quote Wyntoun martyres wa , dhary , upo dby e Ma Isl nf th e o "and upon haly Thurysday Saynt Adrian thai slwe in May." The name " Bass " is known elsewhere in Scotland; thus, "the Bass of Inverury n earthea s "i n mounRivee banke th th f n ro sdo Ury, saiy db traditio coveo nt plague-strickera n alludes propheccastlei a t n I i o .dt y attributed, lik mano s e y others Thomao t , e Rhymersth — "Dee and Don, they shall run on, And Twee Tayd d an shal ;n lru bonne th d y y wateAn Ur f ro Shall bea Base rth s away." t venturno o d e I upo subjece th n f disputeo t d derivation r thfo es name, but the traditional memory of the first inhabitant is still preserved abundantl e nomenclaturth n yi e districtth smala f o er fo l; islann i d Auldhame bay is yet called Baudron's Boat, a sea-worn cavity is St Baldred's Cradle tala d l rocan , namke th goe f Baudron'y eo b s s Statue, beside mainlande sth t Baldred' wellS n o d se rocd an ,th botan k s n ho Whirl, an eddy in the River Tyne.
    [Show full text]
  • Ogzst Transportation Registers from 1787-1870 a Microfilm of Which Is in the NAS
    EF The ancestry of Sir Harry Lauder (1870-1950) A summary of which was made at the Society's 2006 AGM by Gregory Lauder-Frost, F.S.A.,(Scot). Harry Lauder's history as the world's highest-paid performer in 1911 (The Times 24 July 2005), the first British entertainer to sell one million records, in the pre-mass electronic media age, and "Scotland's greatest-ever ambassador" (Sir Winston Churchill), is well-known. His ancestry is not, and doubtless will be ofinterest to many people, especially genealogists, and all those who write to the author to say they are relatives! This family are descended from the famous feudal barons, the Lauders ofThe Bass [see Sir Harry Lauder Roamin' in the Gloamin' 1927 p.26] and were long settled at Morham in East Lothian parts of which had prior to c 1640 been held by the Bass family. GEi EALOG\CAL 78~"""€ Ogzst transportation registers from 1787-1870 a microfilm of which is in the NAS. HH.11 is the warding and liberation book for the Edinburgh Tolbooth 165 7-1816, extracts from the earliest of which appear in the Book ofthe Old Edinburgh Club volumes 4- 6, 8, 9, 11, 12. For more detailed information refer to: Scottish Ancestors; Tracing Scottish Local History. For details of some published lists, including soldiers taken prisoner, see Scottish Trades. Privy Council - was the chief administrative body before the Union of Parliaments in 1707 and dealt with a wide range oftopics. The register has been printed from 1545- 1691 and is indexed so is easily consulted.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Gender, Sex and Social Control: East Lothian, 1610-1640 Harriet J. Cornell Ph.D. School of History University of Edinburgh 2012 Declaration I declare that this thesis has been composed by me and that the work is my own. It has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Any use of any of the material herein, for personal or academic purposes, must be properly acknowledged. Harriet J. Cornell 20 October 2012 i Abstract Early modern Scotland was a religious society where the doctrine of Calvinism permeated everyday life in the localities through the official regulation of personal behaviour. Recent historical studies have debated the nature and experience of social control in Scotland between 1560 and 1780, including the importance and influence of gender, geographic location and social status.
    [Show full text]
  • Rec/S5/21/3/A Rural Economy And
    REC/S5/21/3/A RURAL ECONOMY AND CONNECTIVITY COMMITTEE AGENDA 3rd Meeting, 2021 (Session 5) Wednesday 27 January 2021 The Committee will meet at 9.30 am in a virtual meeting which will be broadcast on www.scottishparliament.tv 1. Climate Change Plan: The Committee will take evidence from— Paul White, Director, CPT (Confederation of Passenger Transport) UK - Scotland; Ewan Wallace, Chair, Society of Chief Officers of Transportation in Scotland (SCOTS); Colin Howden, Director, Transform Scotland; Mark Gaynor, Head of Railway Strategy, Rail Delivery Group; Andy Jefferson, Programme Director, Sustainable Aviation Coalition; Mags Simpson, Head of Policy for Scotland and Northern England, Logistics UK; John Lauder, Deputy CEO and Executive Director, Scotland, Northern Ireland & Republic of Ireland, Sustrans; Professor Jillian Anable, Professor of Transport and Energy, University of Leeds; Derek Halden, Policy lead in Scotland, Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport. 2. European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018: The Committee will consider whether the following negative instrument has been laid under the appropriate procedure— REC/S5/21/3/A The Animals, Food and Feed (EU Exit) (Scotland) (Amendment) Regulations 2020. 3. Subordinate legislation: The Committee will take evidence on the Agricultural Holdings (Relinquishment and Assignation) (Application to Relevant Partnerships) (Scotland) Regulations 2020 [draft] from — Fergus Ewing, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Economy and Tourism, James Muldoon, Head of Agricultural Support Policy Development, and Kirsty Slee, Lawyer, Scottish Government. 4. Subordinate legislation: Fergus Ewing (Cabinet Secretary for Rural Economy and Tourism) to move— Motion S5M-23935 —That the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee recommends that the Agricultural Holdings (Relinquishment and Assignation) (Application to Relevant Partnerships) (Scotland) Regulations 2020 [draft] be approved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Witchcraft Act
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Scottish Witchcraft Act Citation for published version: Goodare, J 2005, 'The Scottish Witchcraft Act', Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, vol. 74, pp. 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009640700109655 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1017/S0009640700109655 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture Publisher Rights Statement: © Goodare, J. (2005). The Scottish witchcraft act. Church History, 74, 39-67doi: 10.1017/S0009640700109655 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 Church History http://journals.cambridge.org/CHH Additional services for Church History: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Scottish Witchcraft Act Julian Goodare Church History / Volume 74 / Issue 01 / March 2005, pp 39 - 67 DOI: 10.1017/S0009640700109655, Published online: 28 July 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/ abstract_S0009640700109655 How to cite this article: Julian Goodare (2005).
    [Show full text]