Ethnic Violence, Elections and Atrocity Prevention in Kenya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ethnic Violence, Elections and Atrocity Prevention in Kenya Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect Occasional Paper Series No. 4, December 2013 “ R2P in Practice”: Ethnic Violence, Elections and Atrocity Prevention in Kenya Abdullahi Boru Halakhe The Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect was established in February 2008 as a catalyst to promote and apply the norm of the “Responsibility to Protect” populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. Through its programs, events and publications, the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect is a resource and a forum for governments, international institutions and non-governmental organizations on prevention and early action to halt mass atrocity crimes. Acknowledgments: This Occasional Paper was produced with the generous support of the government of the Federal Republic of Germany. About the Author: Abdullahi Boru Halakhe is a security and policy analyst on the Horn of Africa and Great Lakes regions. Abdullahi has represented various organizations as an expert on these regions at the UN and United States State Department, as well as in the international media. He has authored and contributed to numerous policy briefings, reports and articles on conflict and security in East Africa. Previously Abdullahi worked as a Horn of Africa Analyst with International Crisis Group working on security issues facing Kenya and Uganda. As a reporter with the BBC East Africa Bureau, he covered the 2007 election and subsequent violence from inside Kenya. Additionally, he has worked with various international and regional NGOs on security and development issues. Cover Photo: Voters queue to cast their votes on 4 March 2013 in Nakuru, Kenya. (Photo by Suleiman Mbatiah/Nation Media/Gallo Images/Getty Images) The views expressed in this Occasional Paper are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. © Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, 2013. All Rights Reserved CONTENTS 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 6 Electoral Violence in Kenya 7 The 2007 Elections 9 Institutional Deficits, Reforms and Results 14 Justice and Accountability 16 The 2013 Elections and Future Challenges 18 Conclusion “R2P IN PRACTICE”: ETHNIC VIOLENCE, ELECTIONS AND ATROCITY PREVENTION IN KENYA Executive Summary On the last Monday of 2007 dozens of ethnic Kikuyu families political structure of Kenyan society. When the resulting crowded into the Assemblies of God church in the village agreement was publicly presented in February 2008, it of Kiambaa seeking sanctuary from the violence engulfing was hailed by some commentators as the first example of their country. A disputed election and simmering resentment “R2P in practice.” over decades of ethnic favouritism by the political elite had transformed Kenya from a perceived paragon of stability This occasional paper by the Global Centre for the in East Africa into a killing zone. Just days after allegedly Responsibility to Protect examines the causes of widespread fraudulent election results had been released in late December ethnic violence in Kenya during 2007-2008 and explores more than 250 people were already dead, many killed by mobs why the country was able to avoid similar violence during armed with machetes and knives. The 400 people crowding the March 2013 election. In particular the author, Abdullahi into the Kiambaa church were terrified they might be next. Boru Halakhe, focuses on the range of reforms implemented, often with international assistance, by the Kenyan government On Tuesday, in broad daylight, a crowd of ethnic Kalenjins, between 2008 and 2013. The report assesses the effectiveness Luhyas and Luos surrounded the church, blocked the exits of these preventive measures in protecting ordinary Kenyans and set the building on fire. Most of the Kikuyu families inside from a recurrence of the sort of mass atrocity crimes, like were able to fight their way out and flee. However, at least the church burning at Kiambaa, which so shocked Kenyans thirty-five people were killed including a number of women and the world. and children who were burned alive. As the international media came to document the horror at Kiambaa, an elderly The report argues, however, that Kenya’s reform process is professor spoke for many Kenyans when he said that the inchoate. In particular, there has been no accountability for scene at the church, “reminds me of Rwanda.” those suspected of being most responsible for orchestrating mass atrocity crimes following the 2007 election. While a Unlike Rwanda in 1994, Kenya did not descend into genocide, highly contentious process of trying the current President, but the ethnic violence lasted weeks and claimed 1,133 Uhuru Kenyatta, and Vice President, William Ruto, at the lives. Hundreds of thousands of Kenyans were displaced International Criminal Court is underway, justice continues or injured. The fact that the bloodletting was eventually to be denied to the victims of the post-election violence. This halted was due in no small part to the efforts of international paper seeks to explain how and why particular preventive mediators, including former UN Secretary-General Kofi efforts succeeded in Kenya in 2013 and what that means for Annan. Weeks of negotiations led to a power-sharing the future of the Responsibility to Protect. government and the promise of deep reforms to the entire OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES | 3 “R2P IN PRACTICE”: ETHNIC VIOLENCE, ELECTIONS AND ATROCITY PREVENTION IN KENYA e 36° 37° 38° 39° 40° Guenal 41° 42° Negēlē SOUTH Konso SUDAN Administrative 5° Boundary 5° Yabelo KENYA Houdat D Kelem aw a Ch'ew Bahir Todenyang ETHIOPIA Banya Sabarei Lokichokio Mega Dolo Odo Sibiloi National Park 4 4 ° Lake Turkana Banissa ° Ramu Mandera Kakuma (Lake Rudolf) Kaabong Lokwa Kangole Central I. Central Island N. P. Moyale Takaba North Horr Lodwar 3 3 ° l ° e El Wak w Buna k Loiyangalani El Beru Hagia r u South I. T Moroto South Island N. P. Lokichar Marsabit Marsabit National Park UGANDA Tarbaj 2° Lokori EASTERN Girito 2° South Turkana Nat. Reserve L. Bisinga Baragoi Wajir L. Oputa Losai National Reserve m a Laisamis u S RIFT VALLEY L aga B o r Tot Mbale Mount Elgon N. P. Maralal Game Sanctuary Maralal Log Dif 1 Kitale o a 1 ° ir Habaswein Bo ° Archer's g' g Kisima a SOMALIA Post o N l Lorule Ewas Tororo WESTERN L. Baringo Mado Gashi Webuye Eldoret Busia Marigat Shaba Nat. Res. NORTH- Kinna Liboi Butere Kakamega Nyahururu Isiolo EASTERN Bisanadi a (Thomson's Falls) Meru er Bilis Qooqaani Nanyuki Nat. Res. Rahole Nat. Lak D Meru Nat. Reserve Solai Hagadera L 0° Kisumu Mt. Kenya Park 0° a Londiani 5199 m k T e Nakuru Mt. Kenya Nat. Park North Kora National a na Aberdares Kericho Molo Kitui Reserve Nyeri N. P. Mfangano I. Nat. Garissa V Homa Bay Gilgil Res. i CENTRAL Embu c Kisii t Naivasha o NYANZA Murang'a r L. Naivasha Nguni i a Masinga 1 Thika Mwingi 1 ° Migori Narok Reservoir Bura ° NAIROBI Kolbio Buur Gaabo AREA Arawale Nat. Res. Nairobi Kitui Hola Kaambooni Musoma Masai Mara Nat. Res. Machakos Boni Nat. Res. A t h Tana River Primate Nat. Res. i L. Magadi Kajiado South Kitui Nat. Res. Dodori Nat. Res. Magadi Sultan-Hamud 2° 2° KENYA Garsen Lamu Pate I. Lake Kibwezi Lamu I. Manda I. Natron Namanga Amboseli Nat. Park COAST L. Amboseli Mtito Andei Tsavo East National Park Ungama Bay Tsavo 3° Kilimanjaro Galana 3° 5895 m Tsavo Tsavo West Malindi Moshi Nat.Park Arusha Voi National capital Taveta Provincional capital Kilifi INDIAN Nyumba Ya Mungi Town, village Reservoir Mariakanii OCEAN Airport 4° Same 4° International boundary Mombasa Shimba Hills Nat. Park Provincional boundary Main road The boundaries and names shown and the designations Secondary road UNITED used on this map do not imply official endorsement or Moa acceptance by the United Nations. Other road or track REPUBLIC OF 5° Railroad TANZANIA Wete 0 50 100 150 5° Tanga Korogwe 0 25 50 75 100 mi 34° 35° 36° 37° 38° 39° Pemba I. 40° 41° 42° Map No. 4187 Rev. 3 UNITED NATIONS Department of Field Support December 2011 Cartographic Section 4 | GLOBAL CENTRE FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT “R2P IN PRACTICE”: ETHNIC VIOLENCE, ELECTIONS AND ATROCITY PREVENTION IN KENYA INTRODUCTION On 4 March 2013 Kenyans voted in their first election efforts were focused on reforming institutions within the since widespread violence following the December 2007 security sector, judiciary and electoral commission, as well presidential election shocked the world. The peaceful 2013 as tackling accountability and the prevalence of hate speech. election contrasted sharply with the violence that erupted in 2007, when within hours of the announcement of the Despite instituting preventive measures over the course of results protests turned violent and mass atrocities were several years, as the country moved towards the 2013 elections committed. In less than two months 1,133 Kenyans were there remained gaps in the implementation of key reforms. killed and over 600,000 driven from their homes while more Reforms to the security sector stalled and prosecutions for than 110,000 private properties were destroyed in fighting crimes committed during the 2007 post-election violence that occurred mainly between ethnic Kikuyus, Luos and were slow and sporadic. Furthermore, certain risk factors Kalenjins in the Rift Valley, Mombasa and urban informal were almost entirely ignored, such as the need for genuine settlements. The perpetrators included individuals, militias land reform to tackle grievances over inequity in land and police with victims often targeted on the basis of an ownership and access. This, coupled with rising inter- assumed connection between their ethnicity and support communal violence that killed 480 people in Tana River, for a particular presidential candidate. Moyale, Turkana, Samburu and other counties during 2012, raised the specter of a possible recurrence of widespread The crimes perpetrated during the deadly violence following bloodshed during the 2013 elections.
Recommended publications
  • Somalia's Insurgents Embrace Twitter As a Weapon
    Nxxx,2011-12-15,A,010,Bs-BW,E1 A10 N THE NEW YORK TIMES INTERNATIONAL THURSDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2011 Somalia’s Insurgents EmbraceTHURSDAY, Twitter DECEMBER 15, 2011 as a Weapon By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN NAIROBI, Kenya — Think of it as the Battle of the Tweets. Somalia’s powerful Islamist in- surgents, the Shabab, best known for chopping off hands and starv- ing their own people, just opened a Twitter account, and in the past week they have been writing up a storm, bragging about recent at- tacks and taunting their enemies. “Your inexperienced boys flee from confrontation & flinch in the face of death,” the Shabab wrote in a post to the Kenyan Army. It is an odd, almost downright hypocritical move from brutal militants in one of world’s most broken-down countries, where millions of people do not have enough food to eat, let alone a laptop. The Shabab have vehe- mently rejected Western prac- tices — banning Western music, movies, haircuts and bras, and even blocking Western aid for famine victims, all in the name of their brand of puritanical Islam — only to embrace Twitter, one of the icons of a modern, networked society. On top of that, the Shabab MOHAMED SHEIKH NOR/ASSOCIATED PRESS clearly have their hands full right The Shabab’s fighters are waging a war against Somalia’s interim government and peacekeepers. now, facing thousands of African Union peacekeepers, the Kenyan bab wrote. “Sure your comments lost only 10. African Union offi- statements. He added that the military, the Ethiopian military will invite derision but try to cials later conceded that the Sha- carefully composed e-mails and and the occasional American muster (or feign) courage at bab had been correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Wildlife in African Landscapes Kenya’S Ewaso Ecosystem
    Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press smithsonian contributions to zoology • number 632 Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press AConserving Chronology Wildlife of Middlein African Missouri Landscapes Plains Kenya’sVillage Ewaso SitesEcosystem Edited by NicholasBy Craig J. M. Georgiadis Johnson with contributions by Stanley A. Ahler, Herbert Haas, and Georges Bonani SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of “diffusing knowledge” was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: “It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge.” This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com- mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to History and Technology Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Museum Conservation Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report on the research and collections of its various museums and bureaus. The Smithsonian Contributions Series are distributed via mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institu- tions throughout the world. Manuscripts submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press from authors with direct affilia- tion with the various Smithsonian museums or bureaus and are subject to peer review and review for compliance with manuscript preparation guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Kenya: 2017 Rerun Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions
    Elections in Kenya 2017 Rerun Presidential Elections Frequently Asked Questions Africa International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org October 25, 2017 Frequently Asked Questions Acronym list .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Why is Kenya holding a second presidential election? ................................................................................. 2 What challenges does the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission face in organizing the rerun election? .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Will voters use any form of electronic voting? ............................................................................................. 5 What technology will be used during the October presidential election? ................................................... 5 What are areas of concern regarding potential electoral violence? ............................................................ 5 Who is eligible to run as a candidate in this election? ................................................................................. 7 What type of electoral system will be used to elect the president? ............................................................ 8 Will members of the diaspora be able to vote in this election? ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes of the EU Horizon 2020 DAFNE PROJECT the Omo
    POLICY BRIEF October 2020 Outcomes of the EU Horizon 2020 DAFNE PROJECT The Omo-Turkana River Basin Progress towards cooperative frameworks KEY POLICY MESSAGES The OTB has reached a stage of pivotal importance for future development; the time to establish a cooperative framework on water governance is now. Transparency and accountability must be improved in order to facilitate the sharing of data and information, increasing trust and reducing the perception of risk. Benefit-sharing which extends beyond energy could enhance regional integration and improve sustainable development within the basin . THE OMO-TURKANA RIVER BASIN potential for hydropower and irrigation schemes that are, if scientifically and equitably managed, crucial to lift millions within and outside the basin out of extreme poverty; this has led to transboundary cooperation in recent years. This policy brief is derived from research conducted under the €5.5M four-year EU Horizon 2020 and Swiss funded ‘DAFNE’ project which concerns the promotion of integrated and adaptive water resources management, explicitly addressing the WEF Nexus and aiming to promote a sustainable economy in regions where new infrastructure and expanding The Omo-Turkana River Basin (OTB) – for the agriculture has to be balanced with social, purposes of the DAFNE Project – comprises of economic and environmental needs. The project two main water bodies: the Omo River in takes a multi- and interdisciplinary approach to Ethiopia and Lake Turkana which it drains into. the formation of a decision analytical While the Omo River lies entirely within Ethiopian territory, Lake Turkana is shared by framework (DAF) for participatory and both Kenya and Ethiopia, with the majority of integrated planning, to allow the evaluation of Lake Turkana residing within Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Election Violence in Kenya
    Spontaneous or Premeditated? DISCUSSION PAPER 57 SPONTANEOUS OR PREMEDITATED? Post-Election Violence in Kenya GODWIN R. MURUNGA NORDISKA AFRIKAINSTITUTET, UppSALA 2011 Indexing terms: Elections Violence Political violence Political crisis Ethnicity Democratization Kenya The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nordiska Afrikainstitutet. Language checking: Peter Colenbrander ISSN 1104-8417 ISBN 978-91-7106-694-7 © The author and Nordiska Afrikainstitutet 2011 Production: Byrå4 Print on demand, Lightning Source UK Ltd. Spontaneous or Premeditated? Contents Contents ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................7 Post-Election Violence: Overview of the Literature .............................................................................8 A Note on the Kenyan Democratisation Processes ............................................................................13 Clash of Interpretations ................................................................................................................................17 The Ballot Box and
    [Show full text]
  • “Not Worth the Risk” Threats to Free Expression Ahead of Kenya’S 2017 Elections
    “Not Worth the Risk” Threats to Free Expression Ahead of Kenya’s 2017 Elections HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH “Not Worth the Risk” Threats to Free Expression Ahead of Kenya’s 2017 Elections Copyright © 2017 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-34761 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org ARTICLE 19 Eastern Africa is an independent not-for profit organization that promotes freedom of expression and access to information as a fundamental human right as well as an empowerment right. ARTICLE 19 Eastern Africa was registered in Kenya in 2007 as an affiliate of ARTICLE 19 international. ARTICLE 19 Eastern African has over the past 10 years implemented projects that included policy and legislative advocacy on media and access to information laws and review of public service media policies and regulations. The organization has also implemented capacity building programmes for journalists on safety and protection and for a select civil society organisation to engage with United Nations (UN) and African Union (AU) mechanisms in 14 countries in Eastern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Twitter Data in Kenya
    A FRAMEWORK FOR PROFILING CRIME REPORTED USING SOCIAL MEDIA – A CASE OF TWITTER DATA IN KENYA BY GIDEON K. SUMBEIYWO A Project Report Submitted to the School of Science and Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science in Information Systems and Technology UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY – AFRICA SUMMER 2018 1 STUDENT’S DECLARATION I, the undersigned, declare that this is my original work and has not been submitted to any other college, institution or university other than the United States International University – Africa in Nairobi for academic credit. Signed: ________________________ Date: _________________ Gideon Kipkorir Sumbeiywo (ID No 620128) This project has been presented for examination with my approval as the appointed supervisor. Signed: ________________________ Date: _________________ Dr. Leah Mutanu Signed: ________________________ Date: _________________ Dean, School of Science and Technology 2 COPYRIGHT All rights reserved; No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without express written authorization from the writer. Gideon Kipkorir Sumbeiywo © 2018 3 ABSTRACT Crime profiling helps law enforcement agencies understand, tackle and sometimes predict the next move by criminals. This can be achieved by monitoring and studying patterns and trends that have occurred in the past and continue to occur in the present. Social media platforms such as Facebook, Google Plus, Instagram, Reddit and in this case Twitter, have created platforms where people share views, opinions and emotions all the while influencing and informing others. This research set out with four objectives that would enable it to be successful in coming up with a framework for profiling.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Registration
    Your Vote, Your Future Table of Contents Acronyms vi Foreword viii Profi les Of Iiec Commissioners - 2009 -2011 x Executive Summary xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 Historical Background 2 1.1 Formation and Mandate of the IIEC 4 1.2 Composition of the IIEC 5 1.3 Summary of the IIEC Achievements 5 CHAPTER 2: REFORMS IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS AND MANAGEMENT OF ELECTIONS 9 2.0 Overview 10 2.1 Reform in the electoral Management Body 10 2.1.1 Creation of the IIEC as a new Electoral body 10 2.1.2 Establishment of a Secretariat 11 2.1.3 Legal Framework 11 2.1.4 Reform in the Management of elections 12 2.1.5 Increasing integration of Technology in Election 15 2.1.6 Regulating political parties 16 2.1.7 Introducing Performance Management in IIEC’s 15 CHAPTER 3: ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE SECRETARIAT 17 3.0 Overview 18 3.1 IIEC Secretariat 18 3.1.1 The Management Structure 18 3.1.2 Physical Facilities 22 3.1.3 Establishment of operational policies and Systems 22 3.1.4 Corporate and Operational Manuals 24 3.1.5 The IIEC Customer Service Charter 26 3.1.6 The Commission Charter 26 CHAPTER 4: PROMOTION OF FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS 27 4.0 Overview 28 4.1 Marginalization and Inclusion 28 4.1.1 Expanding the Democratic Space 30 4.2 Integrity in Conducting Elections 32 CHAPTER 5: FRESH REGISTRATION OF VOTERS AND THE CREATION OF A NEW VOTERS’ REGISTER 35 Published by the Interim Independent Electoral Commission 5.0 Overview 36 Web address of this report: www.iiec.or.ke/ publications 5.1 Voter Registration 36 5.1.1 OMR and EVR Registration 36
    [Show full text]
  • Countering Terrorism in East Africa: the U.S
    Countering Terrorism in East Africa: The U.S. Response Lauren Ploch Analyst in African Affairs November 3, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41473 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Countering Terrorism in East Africa: The U.S. Response Summary The United States government has implemented a range of programs to counter violent extremist threats in East Africa in response to Al Qaeda’s bombing of the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998 and subsequent transnational terrorist activity in the region. These programs include regional and bilateral efforts, both military and civilian. The programs seek to build regional intelligence, military, law enforcement, and judicial capacities; strengthen aviation, port, and border security; stem the flow of terrorist financing; and counter the spread of extremist ideologies. Current U.S.-led regional counterterrorism efforts include the State Department’s East Africa Regional Strategic Initiative (EARSI) and the U.S. military’s Combined Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA), part of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM). The United States has also provided significant assistance in support of the African Union’s (AU) peace operations in Somalia, where the country’s nascent security forces and AU peacekeepers face a complex insurgency waged by, among others, Al Shabaab, a local group linked to Al Qaeda that often resorts to terrorist tactics. The State Department reports that both Al Qaeda and Al Shabaab pose serious terrorist threats to the United States and U.S. interests in the region. Evidence of linkages between Al Shabaab and Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, across the Gulf of Aden in Yemen, highlight another regional dimension of the threat posed by violent extremists in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Election Integrity to Achieve Stability and Prevent Conflicts
    Ensuring election integrity to achieve stability and prevent conflicts Special Political and Decolonisation Committee 1. Introduction Elections are one of the cornerstones of democracy. Considering that they empower people to participate actively in the formation of their political reality, protecting and promoting their integrity is therefore a top policy priority. Unfortunately, troubled electoral processes and their fall-out have challenged the credibility of democracy in recent years, thus leading to political instability. On the other hand, elections that are recognized as free and fair result in a peaceful transition of power. Without electoral integrity, leaders and officials lack accountability to the public, confidence in the election results is weak and the government lacks necessary legitimacy. Electoral integrity allows for peaceful resolution of conflict, open dialogue, debate, and information sharing amongst leaders and the public. Ultimately, the responsibility of protecting and promoting the integrity of elections falls on national stakeholders. In doing so, states not only pass legislation, set up institutions, or draw up codes of conduct and other enforcement mechanisms at the national level, but also commit themselves to regional and international principles of democracy. Up until now, that task has been completed with varying levels of success and so the question remains: how can election integrity be ensured both universally and consistently? 2. Terminology Electoral integrity: Any election that is based on the democratic principles of universal suffrage and political equality as reflected in international standards and agreements, and is professional, impartial, and transparent in its preparation and administration throughout the electoral cycle. Voting/Electoral system: Equipment, materials, and documentation used to conduct elections, including capturing votes, count votes, and generate reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Mombasa County Crime and Violence Report
    MOMBASA COUNTY CRIME AND VIOLENCE RAPID ASSESSMENT MOMBASA COUNTY CRIME AND VIOLENCE RAPID ASSESSMENT Cover photo credit: Andrea Albini | Creative Commons 3.0 Design and copy editing: Laura C. Johnson II Contents Foreword .................................................v Acknowledgements .........................................vi Acronyms ................................................vii 1 Introduction .............................................1 Crime and Violence Prevention in Kenya ...............................3 Crime and Violence Prevention Training ...............................4 County-Level Crime and Violence Prevention ..........................4 Framework for Analysis .............................................7 Goals of the Rapid Assessment ......................................9 Methodology . .9 2 Background: Crime and Violence Trends in Kenya ............13 Boda-Boda-Related Crime and Violence .............................14 Alcohol and Drug Abuse ...........................................14 Sexual and Gender-Based Violence ..................................16 Violence against Children ..........................................16 Radicalization and Recruitment into Violent Extremism ..................17 3 Rapid Assessment of Mombasa County .....................19 Overview of County ...............................................19 Cross-Cutting Drivers of Crime and Violence ..........................20 Dynamics of Crime and Violence ....................................23 Security Interventions .............................................40
    [Show full text]
  • Community Resilience to Violent Extremism in Kenya
    [PEACEW RKS [ COMMUNITY RESILIENCE TO VIOLENT EXTREMISM IN KENYA Lauren Van Metre ABOUT THE REPORT Focusing on six urban neighborhoods in Kenya, this report explores how key resilience factors have prevented or countered violent extremist activity at the local level. It is based on a one-year, mixed-method study led by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and supported by Sahan Research. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Lauren Van Metre, PhD, led the Applied Research Center at USIP and currently conducts research and writing on community resilience to violence in Ukraine and Kenya. She directed USIP’s grant programs, working with researchers worldwide to build evidence for successful interventions against electoral and extremist violence. Cover photo: People carry placards as they attend a memorial concert for the Garissa University students who were killed during an attack by gunmen, at the “Freedom Corner” in Nairobi, Kenya on April 14, 2015. Kenya gave the United Nations three months to remove Dadaab camp, housing 350,000 registered Somali refugees, as part of its response to the killing of 148 people in nearby Garissa by a Somali Islamist group. Reuters/Thomas Mukoya Image ID: rtr4xbqv. The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No. 122. First published 2016. ISBN: 978-1-60127-615-5 © 2016 by the United States Institute of Peace CONTENTS PEACEWORKS • SEPTEMBER 2016 • NO.
    [Show full text]