DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenya General Elections, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL REPORT REPUBLIC OF KENYA General Elections 2017 REPUBLIC OF KENYA European Union Election Observation Mission FINAL REPORT General Elections 2017 January 2018 This report contains the findings of the EU Election Observation Mission (EOM) on the general elections 2017 in Kenya. The EU EOM is independent from the European Union’s institutions, and therefore this report is not an official position of the European Union. KEY CONCLUSIONS OF THE EU EOM KENYA 2017 1. The Kenyan people, including five million young people able to vote for the first time, showed eagerness to participate in shaping the future of their country. However, the electoral process was damaged by political leaders attacking independent institutions and by a lack of dialogue between the two sides, with escalating disputes and violence. Eventually the opposition withdrew its presidential candidate and refused to accept the legitimacy of the electoral process. Structural problems and specific electoral issues both need to be addressed meaningfully to prevent problems arising during future elections. 2. Electoral reform needs to be carried out well in advance of any election, and to be based on broad consensus. The very late legal amendments and appointment of the leadership of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) before the 2017 elections put excessive pressure on the new election administration. 3. Despite efforts to improve the situation, there was a persistent lack of trust in the IEBC by the opposition and other stakeholders, demonstrating the need for greater independence and accountability as well as for sustained communication and more meaningful stakeholder consultation. There was improved use of technology, but insufficient capacity or security testing. Technology cannot replace trust. 4. The 8 August general elections were competitive with on average nearly eight candidates per seat being elected. Campaigning was largely free but marred by politicians’ attacks on state institutions and by the misuse of state resources at national and local levels. Polling on 8 August was largely peaceful and well conducted but there were problems with results transmission, tallying and transparency. Incumbent President Kenyatta of the Jubilee Party was declared the winner by a margin of 1.4 million votes. 5. The Supreme Court’s annulment of the August presidential election was historic in ruling against an incumbent president and for focusing on the process of the election (rather than the result). The ruling appeared to prompt improvements in results transmission, verification and transparency in the fresh presidential election in October and thus raised standards of public service. However, the political environment deteriorated sharply. 6. Disturbances from August to December 2017 involved some disproportionate actions by security forces (including the use of live fire), costing dozens of lives and also reportedly involved sexual violence. Criminal elements and gangs also contributed to the violence. There was an increasingly ethnic dimension, with ethnic profiling and threats observed in different parts of the country. 7. Jubilee’s unilateral amendments to electoral legislation during the fresh election, harsh rhetoric against the judiciary and acts of intimidation against civil society were highly antagonistic and not consistent with international commitments and good practice for democratic functioning. 8. Supporters of the opposition National Super Alliance (NASA) assaulted and intimidated polling staff, attacked IEBC offices, and disrupted electoral preparations. This is illegal and anti-democratic. 9. The judiciary was subject to increasing pressure. It was extremely concerning that the day before the fresh presidential election a case seeking postponement of polling could not be heard by the Supreme Court due to a lack of a quorum. This deepened concerns of political intimidation of the judiciary. 10. The fresh presidential election in October was generally well conducted, with full results data and forms made available promptly. Following NASA’s boycott, there was a severely reduced turnout and a landslide victory for Jubilee. 11. Key civil society organisations and networks were subject to intimidating state actions just before each of the two deadlines for lodging presidential petitions (in August and November). The media provided increasing scrutiny of the process, but could not always report freely and attempts were made to restrict live coverage of disturbances. 12. The newly elected Parliament does not comply with the two-thirds gender principle prescribed by the Constitution, although there was a slight increase in the number of women elected. 13. Stakeholders referred to the need to address deep-rooted structural issues of exclusion and the “winner- takes-all” system of government in order to prevent future electoral problems and the risk of violence. The EU election observation mission (EOM) offers 29 recommendations for reform. These include: taking actions to provide for the resilience of independent institutions involved in elections, inclusive legal reform, strengthening of the IEBC’s independence and accountability, improved ICT arrangements and IEBC oversight, a legal requirement for a comprehensive results framework, and review of the electoral system considering impact on the political participation of women and inclusivity. TABLE OF CONTENTS KEY CONCLUSIONS OF THE EU EOM KENYA 2017 .............................................................................................................. 2 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................... 4 II. EU EOM FULL LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 8 III. EU EOM METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 11 IV. POLITICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................... 11 V. ELECTORAL REFORM PRIOR TO THE 2017 GENERAL ELECTIONS .............................................................................. 12 VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 VII. ELECTORAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION (EDR) .................................................................................................................. 15 VIII. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................................................... 18 IX. VOTER REGISTRATION AND THE DELIMITATION OF CONSTITUENCIES .................................................................... 22 X. PARTY PRIMARIES AND THE REGISTRATION OF CANDIDATES .................................................................................. 25 XI. THE FIRST CAMPAIGN PERIOD FOR THE GENERAL ELECTIONS ................................................................................. 26 XII. 8 AUGUST ELECTION DAY AND RESULTS PROCESS ................................................................................................... 27 XIII. REACTIONS TO THE AUGUST RESULTS AND THE CAMPAIGN PERIOD ...................................................................... 30 XIV. 26 OCTOBER ELECTION DAY AND RESULTS PROCESS ............................................................................................... 33 XV. REACTIONS TO THE OCTOBER RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 35 XVI. MEDIA AND SOCIAL MEDIA....................................................................................................................................... 37 XVII. CIVIL SOCIETY AND CITIZEN OBSERVATION .............................................................................................................. 42 XVIII. PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES RELATED TO ELECTIONS ........................................................................................... 43 XIX. POLITICAL FINANCE ................................................................................................................................................... 44 XX. PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN ..................................................................................................................................... 46 XXI. PARTICIPATION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ..................................................................................................... 47 ANNEX 1 - EU EOM STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF 26 OCTOBER POLLING AND RESULTS DATA ............................................ 48 ANNEX 2 – EU EOM RECOMMENDATIONS CHART (WITH RELATED INTERNATIONAL COMMITMENT/STANDARD) ....... 53 ANNEX 3 – THE ELECTIONS IN NUMBERS AND CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS ...................................................................... 66 ANNEX 4 – MAP OF 8 AUGUST 2017 PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS .......................................................................................... 70 ANNEX 5 – MAP OF 26 OCTOBER 2017 TURNOUT ........................................................................................................... 71 ANNEX 6 - LIST OF ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... 72 An audio podcast version of the
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface…………………………………………………………………….. i 1. District Context………………………………………………………… 1 1.1. Demographic characteristics………………………………….. 1 1.2. Socio-economic Profile………………………………………….. 1 2. Constituency Profile………………………………………………….. 1 2.1. Demographic characteristics………………………………….. 1 2.2. Socio-economic Profile………………………………………….. 1 2.3. Electioneering and Political Information……………………. 2 2.4. 1992 Election Results…………………………………………… 2 2.5. 1997 Election Results…………………………………………… 2 2.6. Main problems……………………………………………………. 2 3. Constitution Making/Review Process…………………………… 3 3.1. Constituency Constitutional Forums (CCFs)………………. 3 3.2. District Coordinators……………………………………………. 5 4. Civic Education………………………………………………………… 6 4.1. Phases covered in Civic Education…………………………… 6 4.2. Issues and Areas Covered……………………………………… 6 5. Constituency Public Hearings……………………………………… 7 5.1. Logistical Details…………………………………………………. 5.2. Attendants Details……………………………………………….. 7 5.3. Concerns and Recommendations…………………………….. 7 8 Appendices 31 1. DISTRICT PROFILE Kwanza is a constituency in Trans Nzoia District. Trans Nzoia District is one of 18 districts of the Rift Valley Province of Kenya. 1.1 Demographic Characteristics Male Female Total District Population by Sex 286,836 288,826 575,662 Total District Population Aged 18 years & 167,902 166,490 334,392 Below Total District Population Aged Above 18 years 118,934 122,336 241,270 Population Density (persons/Km2) 231 1.2 Socio-Economic Profile Trans Nzoia District: • Is the 2nd most densely populated district in
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    SFG3691 V6 Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR THE PROPOSED REHABILITATION/UPGRADING OF VOI MAGISTRATE COURT TO A HIGH COURT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT Submitted to: The Judiciary of Kenya Supreme Court Building, City Hall Way, P.O. Box 30041 – 00100 NAIROBI, KENYA Public Disclosure Authorized FEBRUARY, 2017 ESIA and ESMP for the proposed construction of a new magistrate court in Voi Client: THE JUDICIARY OF KENYA Assignment: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW MAGISTRATE COURT IN VOI Report Title: FINAL REPORT Name and Address of Expert: Naomi Gitau, EIA Lead Expert (Reg. 0562) P.O. Box 435 - 00216 TEL: 254 720 705850 EMAIL: [email protected] GITHUNGURI, KENYA Signed: _________________ Date: _______________ Name and Address of Proponent: The Judiciary of Kenya Supreme Court Building, City Hall Way, P.O. Box 30041 – 00100 NAIROBI, KENYA Signed: _______________ Date: _____________________ 2 ESIA and ESMP for the proposed construction of a new magistrate court in Voi Table of Contents EXCECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 11 Project Background ................................................................................................................
  • THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered As a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) � Vol

    THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered As a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) Vol

    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR LAW REPORTING LIBRARY' THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) Vol. CXXII—No. 154 NAIROBI, 14th August, 2020 Price Sh. 60 CONTENTS GALETT'E'NOTICES GAZETTE NOTICES CONTD' PAGE The Auctioneers Act—Appointment 3160 The Co-operative Societies Act—Inquiry Order 3206 Supreme Court of Kenya —AugustRecess 3160 The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act— Environmental Impact Assessment Study Reports 3206-3208 The Senate Standing Orders—Special Sitting of the Senate 3160 Disposal of Uncollected Goods 3208-3209 The Nairobi International Financial Centre Act— Appointment 3160 Loss of Share Certificate 3210 The Wildlife Conservation and Management Act—Task Change of Names 3210-3211 Force 3160-3161 County Governments Notices 3161-3162 SUPPLEMENT Nos. 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 139, 140 and 141 The Land Registration Act—Issue of Provisional Certificates, etc 3162-3178 Legislative Supplements, 2020 The Public Officer Ethics Act—Administrative Procedures 3178-3182 LEGAL NOTICE NO. PAGE The Energy Act—Amended Schedule of Tariffs for Supply 135-138—The Public Health (Covid-19 Prohibition of Electrical Energy, etc 3182-3184 cif Sale of Alcoholic Drinks) Rules, 2020, etc .. 1715 The Kenya Information and Communications Act— 139—The Tax Procedures (Unassembled Motor Application for Licences 3184 Vehicles and Trailers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 1739 The Unclaimed Financial Assets Act—No Objection 3185 140-150—The Competition Act—Exclusions 1741 The Estate Agents Act—Registered Estate Agents 3186 151-132—The Stamp Duty (Valuation of The National Government Constituencies Development Immovable Property) Regulations, 2020, etc ..
  • Elections in Kenya: 2017 Rerun Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions

    Elections in Kenya: 2017 Rerun Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions

    Elections in Kenya 2017 Rerun Presidential Elections Frequently Asked Questions Africa International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org October 25, 2017 Frequently Asked Questions Acronym list .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Why is Kenya holding a second presidential election? ................................................................................. 2 What challenges does the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission face in organizing the rerun election? .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Will voters use any form of electronic voting? ............................................................................................. 5 What technology will be used during the October presidential election? ................................................... 5 What are areas of concern regarding potential electoral violence? ............................................................ 5 Who is eligible to run as a candidate in this election? ................................................................................. 7 What type of electoral system will be used to elect the president? ............................................................ 8 Will members of the diaspora be able to vote in this election? ..................................................................
  • Post-Election Violence in Kenya

    Post-Election Violence in Kenya

    Spontaneous or Premeditated? DISCUSSION PAPER 57 SPONTANEOUS OR PREMEDITATED? Post-Election Violence in Kenya GODWIN R. MURUNGA NORDISKA AFRIKAINSTITUTET, UppSALA 2011 Indexing terms: Elections Violence Political violence Political crisis Ethnicity Democratization Kenya The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nordiska Afrikainstitutet. Language checking: Peter Colenbrander ISSN 1104-8417 ISBN 978-91-7106-694-7 © The author and Nordiska Afrikainstitutet 2011 Production: Byrå4 Print on demand, Lightning Source UK Ltd. Spontaneous or Premeditated? Contents Contents ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................7 Post-Election Violence: Overview of the Literature .............................................................................8 A Note on the Kenyan Democratisation Processes ............................................................................13 Clash of Interpretations ................................................................................................................................17 The Ballot Box and
  • Voter Registration

    Voter Registration

    Your Vote, Your Future Table of Contents Acronyms vi Foreword viii Profi les Of Iiec Commissioners - 2009 -2011 x Executive Summary xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 Historical Background 2 1.1 Formation and Mandate of the IIEC 4 1.2 Composition of the IIEC 5 1.3 Summary of the IIEC Achievements 5 CHAPTER 2: REFORMS IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS AND MANAGEMENT OF ELECTIONS 9 2.0 Overview 10 2.1 Reform in the electoral Management Body 10 2.1.1 Creation of the IIEC as a new Electoral body 10 2.1.2 Establishment of a Secretariat 11 2.1.3 Legal Framework 11 2.1.4 Reform in the Management of elections 12 2.1.5 Increasing integration of Technology in Election 15 2.1.6 Regulating political parties 16 2.1.7 Introducing Performance Management in IIEC’s 15 CHAPTER 3: ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE SECRETARIAT 17 3.0 Overview 18 3.1 IIEC Secretariat 18 3.1.1 The Management Structure 18 3.1.2 Physical Facilities 22 3.1.3 Establishment of operational policies and Systems 22 3.1.4 Corporate and Operational Manuals 24 3.1.5 The IIEC Customer Service Charter 26 3.1.6 The Commission Charter 26 CHAPTER 4: PROMOTION OF FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS 27 4.0 Overview 28 4.1 Marginalization and Inclusion 28 4.1.1 Expanding the Democratic Space 30 4.2 Integrity in Conducting Elections 32 CHAPTER 5: FRESH REGISTRATION OF VOTERS AND THE CREATION OF A NEW VOTERS’ REGISTER 35 Published by the Interim Independent Electoral Commission 5.0 Overview 36 Web address of this report: www.iiec.or.ke/ publications 5.1 Voter Registration 36 5.1.1 OMR and EVR Registration 36
  • The Motions Tracker 2016

    The Motions Tracker 2016

    REPUBLIC OF KENYA THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELEVENTH PARLIAMENT (FOURTH SESSION) MOTIONS TRACKER 2016 The Motions Tracker provides an overview of the current status of all Motions before the National Assembly during the year. NO. SUBJECT NOTICE OF PROPOSER SECONDER DIVISION DEBATED REMARKS MOTION AND CONCLUDED 1. THAT pursuant to the provisions of Standing 9/2/2016 Hon. Katoo Ole Hon. Thomas 9/2/2016 Adopted Order No. 171(1)(d), this House approves the Metito, MP Mwadeghu, appointment of Members to the House Business (Majority Party MP (Minority Committee in addition to the Members specified Whip) Party Whip) under paragraph (a) (b) & (c). 2. THAT, notwithstanding the provisions of 10/2/2016 Hon. Aden Hon. Chris 10/2/2016 Adopted Standing Order 97(4), this House orders that, Duale, MP Wamalwa, each speech in a debate on Bills sponsored by (Leader of the MP (Deputy a Committee, the Leader of the Majority Majority Party) Minority Party or the Leader of the Minority Party be Party Whip) limited as follows:- A maximum of forty five (45) minutes for the Mover, in moving and fifteen minutes (15) in replying, a maximum of thirty (30) minutes for the Chairperson of the relevant Committee (if the Bill is not sponsored by the relevant Committee), and a maximum of ten (10) minutes for any other Member Status as at Thursday, 22nd December, 2016 The National Assembly 1 NO. SUBJECT NOTICE OF PROPOSER SECONDER DIVISION DEBATED REMARKS MOTION AND CONCLUDED speaking, except the Leader of the Majority Party and the Leader of the Minority Party, who shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen Minutes (15) each (if the Bill is not sponsored by either of them); and that priority in speaking be accorded to the Leader of the Majority Party, the Leader of the Minority Party and the Chairperson of the relevant Departmental Committee, in that Order.
  • Election Violence in Kenya

    Election Violence in Kenya

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University The Siegel Institute Journal of Applied Ethics Volume 7 Number 1 Article 1 February 2018 Election Violence in Kenya Judith Kimani Kennesaw State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/silecjournal Recommended Citation Kimani, Judith (2018) "Election Violence in Kenya," The Siegel Institute Journal of Applied Ethics: Vol. 7 : No. 1 , Article 1. DOI: 10.32727/21.2018.7 Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/silecjournal/vol7/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Siegel Institute Journal of Applied Ethics by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Election Violence in Kenya Cover Page Footnote I would like to thank Dr. Linda M. Johnston Executive Director and Professor at Siegel Institute for Leadership, Ethics, and Character at Kennesaw State University for her help and guidance while writing this article. I would also like to thank my sons, Lawrence and Liam for your patience, support, and encouragement while I was writing this paper. This article is available in The Siegel Institute Journal of Applied Ethics: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ silecjournal/vol7/iss1/1 Kimani: Election Violence in Kenya Election Violence in Kenya Writing this paper has been an exciting learning process, and some of the events that have occurred since I started on it have not been experienced before.
  • Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections? Edwin Odhiambo Abuya

    Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections? Edwin Odhiambo Abuya

    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 8 | Issue 2 Article 1 Spring 2010 Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections? Edwin Odhiambo Abuya Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Edwin Odhiambo Abuya, Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections?, 8 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 122 (2010). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol8/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2010 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 8, Issue 2 (Spring 2010) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections? Edwin Odhiambo Abuya* Asiyekubali kushindwa si msihindani.1 I. INTRODUCTION ¶1 Can African States hold free and fair elections? To put it another way, is it possible to conduct presidential elections in Africa that meet internationally recognized standards? These questions can be answered in the affirmative. However, in order to safeguard voting rights, specific reforms must be adopted and implemented on the ground. In keeping with international legal standards on democracy,2 the constitutions of many African states recognize the right to vote.3 This right is reflected in the fact that these states hold regular elections. The right to vote is fundamental in any democratic state, but an entitlement does not guarantee that right simply by providing for elections.
  • Special Issue the Kenya Gazette

    Special Issue the Kenya Gazette

    SPECIAL ISSUE THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) Vol. CXV_No. 64 NAIROBI, 19th April, 2013 Price Sh. 60 GAZETTE NOTICE NO. 5381 THE ELECTIONS ACT (No. 24 of 2011) THE ELECTIONS (PARLIAMENTARY AND COUNTY ELECTIONS) PETITION RULES, 2013 ELECTION PETITIONS, 2013 IN EXERCISE of the powers conferred by section 75 of the Elections Act and Rule 6 of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2013, the Chief Justice of the Republic of Kenya directs that the election petitions whose details are given hereunder shall be heard in the election courts comprising of the judges and magistrates listed and sitting at the court stations indicated in the schedule below. SCHEDULE No. Election Petition Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Electoral Area Election Court Court Station No. BUNGOMA SENATOR Bungoma High Musikari Nazi Kombo Moses Masika Wetangula Senator, Bungoma Justice Francis Bungoma Court Petition IEBC County Muthuku Gikonyo No. 3 of 2013 Madahana Mbayah MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT Bungoma High Moses Wanjala IEBC Member of Parliament, Justice Francis Bungoma Court Petition Lukoye Bernard Alfred Wekesa Webuye East Muthuku Gikonyo No. 2 of 2013 Sambu Constituency, Bungoma Joyce Wamalwa, County Returning Officer Bungoma High John Murumba Chikati I.E.B.C Member of Parliament, Justice Francis Bungoma Court Petition Returning Officer Tongaren Constituency, Muthuku Gikonyo No. 4 of 2013 Eseli Simiyu Bungoma County Bungoma High Philip Mukui Wasike James Lusweti Mukwe Member of Parliament, Justice Hellen A. Bungoma Court Petition IEBC Kabuchai Constituency, Omondi No. 5 of 2013 Silas Rotich Bungoma County Bungoma High Joash Wamangoli IEBC Member of Parliament, Justice Hellen A.
  • Wildlife and Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Taita, Kenya Njogu, J.G

    Wildlife and Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Taita, Kenya Njogu, J.G

    Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective: wildlife and forest biodiversity conservation in Taita, Kenya Njogu, J.G. Citation Njogu, J. G. (2004). Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective: wildlife and forest biodiversity conservation in Taita, Kenya. Leiden: African Studies Centre. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12921 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12921 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective African Studies Centre Research Report 73 / 2004 Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective Wildlife and forest biodiversity conservation in Taita, Kenya James Gichiah Njogu This PhD project was part of the research programme Resources, Environment and Development Research Associates (REDRA) of the Amsterdam Research Institute for Global Issues and Development Studies (AGIDS). It also formed part of Working Programme 1, Natural resource management: Knowledge transfer, social insecurity and cultural coping, of the Research School for Resource Studies for Development (CERES). The Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research (WOTRO) jointly with the Amsterdam Research Institute for Global Issues and Development Studies (AGIDS) of the University of Amsterdam funded this research. The School of Environmental Studies of Moi University (Eldoret, Kenya) provided institutional support. Published by: African Studies Centre P.O. Box 9555 2300 RB Leiden Tel: + 31 - 71 - 527 33 72 Fax: + 31 - 71 - 527 33 44 E-mail: [email protected] Website:http://asc.leidenuniv.nl Printed by: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.V., Enschede ISBN 90.5448.057.2 © African Studies Centre, Leiden, 2004 Contents List of maps viii List of figures viii List of boxes viii List of tables ix List of plates x List of abbreviations x Acknowledgements xii PART 1: THE CONTEXT 1 1.
  • Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used for Treatment of Malaria by Kipsigis People in Kericho County, Kenya

    Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used for Treatment of Malaria by Kipsigis People in Kericho County, Kenya

    IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS) e-ISSN:2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 13, Issue 4 Ver. VI (Jul – Aug 2018), PP 24-30 www.iosrjournals.org Ethnobotanical Survey Of Medicinal Plants Used For Treatment Of Malaria By Kipsigis People In Kericho County, Kenya. Bwogo ChepchumbaPacifica,Dr. Benson Nyanchongi, Dr. Rael Masai Kisii University, Corresponding Author: Bwogochepchumba Pacifica Abstract: Background: Ethnobotanical pharmacopoeia is importantly used in intervention of disease and need arises for documentation and preservation of tradition medicinal knowledge to boost the discovery of new drugs. Due to the emergence of drug resistance to malaria, there is a high possibility of development of resistance to ACT (that is the first line of treatment), thus a need for identification and development of new and novel therapeutic approaches. Herbs offer an opportunity for discovery and development of new chemically diverse antimalarial agents, however little documentation has been done. The first objective of the present study was to identify and document preferred medicinal plants used for treatment of malaria in Kericho East Sub- County. Methods: Field research was conducted in six Sub- Counties of Kericho County in Kenya namely Kipkelion East, Kipkelion West, Kericho West, Kericho East, Sigowet/Soin and Bureti. We randomly sampled 120 interviewees according to age, gender, occupation and level of education. Plant use data was collected through semi-structured questionnaires; transect walks, oral interviews and focus groups discussions. Voucher specimens of all cited botanic species were collected and deposited at National museum herbarium, Nairobi Botany department. Results Twenty medicinal plant species were yielded from the informants which are used to treat different symptoms and signs of malaria including; headache, fever, diarrhea, stomach-ache.