FEB – Fresenius Environmental Bulletin founded jointly by F. Korte and F. Coulston
Production by PSP – Parlar Scientific Publications, Angerstr. 12, 85354 Freising, Germany in cooperation with Lehrstuhl für Chemisch-Technische Analyse und Lebensmitteltechnologie, Technische Universität München, 85350 Freising - Weihenstephan, Germany Copyright © by PSP – Parlar Scientific Publications, Angerstr. 12, 85354 Freising, Germany. All rights are reserved, especially the right to translate into foreign language. No part of the journal may be reproduced in any form- through photocopying, microfilming or other processes- or converted to a machine language, especially for data processing equipment- without the written permission of the publisher. The rights of reproduction by lecture, radio and television transmission, magnetic sound recording or similar means are also reserved.
Printed in GERMANY – ISSN 1018-4619
© by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
FEB - EDITORIAL BOARD Environmental Toxicology: Prof. Dr. H. Greim Chief Editor: Senatskomm. d. DFG z. Prüfung gesundheitsschädl. Arbeitsstoffe TU München, 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany Prof. Dr. H. Parlar Institut für Lebensmitteltechnologie und Analytische Chemie Prof. Dr. A. Kettrup TU München - 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany Institut für Lebensmitteltechnologie und Analytische Chemie e-mail: [email protected] TU München - 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
FEB - ADVISORY BOARD Co-Editors: Environmental Analytical Chemistry: Environmental Analytical Chemistry: K. Ballschmitter, D - K. Bester, D - K. Fischer, D - R. Kallenborn, N Dr. D. Kotzias D.C.G. Muir, CAN - R. Niessner, D - W. Vetter, D – R. Spaccini, I Via Germania 29 21027 Barza (Va) ITALY Environmental Proteomic and Biology:
D. Adelung, D - G.I. Kvesitadze, GEOR A. Reichlmayr-Lais, D - C. Steinberg, D Environmental Proteomic and Biology:
Environmental Chemistry: Prof. Dr. A. Görg Fachgebiet Proteomik J.P. Lay, D - J. Burhenne, D - S. Nitz, D - R. Kreuzig, D TU München - 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany D. L. Swackhammer, U.S.A. - R. Zepp, U.S.A. – T. Alpay, TR V. Librando; I
Prof. Dr. A. Piccolo Università di Napoli “Frederico II”, Environmental Management: Dipto. Di Scienze Chimico-Agrarie Via Università 100, 80055 Portici (Napoli), Italy L.O. Ruzo, U.S.A - U. Schlottmann, D
Prof. Dr. G. Schüürmann UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum, Environmental Toxicology: Sektion Chemische Ökotoxikologie Leipzig-Halle GmbH, K.-W. Schramm, D - H. Frank, D - D. Schulz-Jander, U.S.A. - Permoserstr.15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany H.U. Wolf, D – M. McLachlan, S
Environmental Chemistry: Prof. Dr. M. Bahadir Managing Editor: Institut für Ökologische Chemie und Abfallanalytik TU Braunschweig Dr. G. Leupold Hagenring 30, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany Editorial Chief-Officer:
Prof. Dr. M. Spiteller Selma Parlar Institut für Umweltforschung Universität Dortmund PSP- Parlar Scientific Publications Otto-Hahn-Str. 6, 44221 Dortmund, Germany Angerstr.12, 85354 Freising, Germany
e-mail: [email protected] - www.psp-parlar.de Prof. Dr. Ivan Holoubek RECETOX_TOCOEN Marketing Chief Manager: Kamenice 126/3, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic Max-Josef Kirchmaier MASELL-Agency for Marketing & Communication, Public-Rela- tions Environmental Management: Angerstr.12, 85354 Freising, Germany Dr. H. Schlesing e-mail: [email protected] - www.masell.com
Secretary General, EARTO, Rue de Luxembourg,3, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Prof. Dr. F. Vosniakos T.E.I. of Thessaloniki, Applied Physics Lab. Abstracted/ indexed in: Biology & Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 14561, 54101 Thessaloniki, Greece BIOSIS, C.A.B. International, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Awareness, Current Contents/ Agricul- Dr. K.I. Nikolaou ture, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, CSA Mechanical & Trans- Organization of the Master Plan & portation Engineering, IBIDS database, Information Ventures, NISC, Environmental Protection of Thessaloniki (OMPEPT) Research Alert, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI Expanded), 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece SciSearch, Selected Water Resources Abstracts
0 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
CONTENTS
REVIEW ARTICLE
THE USE OF DIFFERENT REACTOR SYSTEMS FOR 3695 BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATERS Lucija Foglar, Sanja Papić, Dunja Margeta and Katica Sertić-Bionda
A REVIEW OF AGRO-FOOD WASTE TRANSFORMATION 3703 INTO FEEDSTOCK FOR USE IN FERMENTATION Paulina Gutiérrez-Macías, Brenda Montañez-Barragán and Blanca E Barragán-Huerta
ORIGINAL PAPERS
A STATISTICAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN TO DETERMINE THE AZO DYE 3717 DECOLORIZATION AND DEGRADATION BY THE HETEROGENEOUS FENTON PROCESS Yeliz Aşçı, Ezgi A. Demirtas, Cansu Filik Iscen and A. Sermet Anagun
DETERMINE SOME MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF 3727 CRAYFISH (Astacus leptodactylus ESCHSCHOLTZ, 1823) WITH TRADIONAL METHODS AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS IN DIKILITAS POND, ANKARA, TURKEY Semra Benzer and Recep Benzer
FIRST IDENTIFICATION OF THE CYLINDROSPERMOPSIN (CYN)-PRODUCING CYANOBACTERIUM 3736 Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (WOLOSZYŃSKA) SEENAYYA & SUBBA RAJU IN SERBIA Nevena B. Đorđević, Snežana B. Simić and Andrija R. Ćirić
GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS AND THE OPTIMUM OPERATION 3743 MODEL OF TIMBER PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN SOUTHERN CHINA Yuan Zhou, Li-feng Zheng, Xin-nian Zhou, Xi-sheng Hu, Zhi-long Wu, Cheng-jun Zhou and Dan Li
MECHANISM OF GALLIC ACID EXTRACTION IN THE 3754 TRIBUTYL PHOSPHATE/KEROSENE EXTRACTING SYSTEM Yundong Wu, Kanggen Zhou, Shuyu Dong and Wei Yu
CONTENT OF ZINC IN DIFFERENT GRASS SPECIES GROWING ALONG A FAST HIGHWAY 3759 Elżbieta Malinowska, Kazimierz Jankowski, Beata Wiśniewska-Kadżajan, Jolanta Jankowska, Jacek Sosnowski, Grażyna Anna Ciepiela, Wiesław Szulc and Roman Kolczarek
IMPACT OF POSTPONED WATER FEEDING TIME ON THE 3766 INFILTRATION-REDUCING EFFECT OF CEMENT INTO ALLUVIAL SOILS Jinlan Ji and Guisheng Fan
STUDY ON THE SORPTION OF CHROMIUM(III) IONS IN AQUEOUS 3774 SOLUTION WITH DIATOMITE TREATED WITH MANGANESE OXIDE Xiangying Zeng and Er Li
LOSS CHARACTERISTICS OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS 3780 IN SURFACE RUNOFF WITH DIFFERENT LAND USE TYPES OF A SMALL WATERSHED IN FREEZE-THAW AGRICULTURAL AREA Xuehui Lai, Fanghua Hao and Xiaoli Ren
3693 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
FeCl3/NaNO2-CATALYZED OXIDATIVE DEGRADATION OF 3794 AQUATIC STEROID ESTROGENS WITH MOLECULAR OXYGEN Lianzhi Wang, Zhengchao Duan, Taoli Qu, Dongmei Fu and Xinmiao Liang
EVOLUTION OF THE MICROBIAL COMMUNITY 3802 RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS Qing-Xiang Yang, Rui-Fei Wang, Ying Xu, Kai-Yue Zhuo, Hong-Li Zhao, Fei Zhang and Liu Yang
OPTIMIZATION OF DERIVATIZATION OF ACIDIC DRUGS FOR ANALYSIS BY GC-MS 3813 AND ITS APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF DRUG RESIDUES IN WASTEWATER Richard Sýkora, Milada Vávrová, Petr Lacina and Ludmila Mravcova
ADSORPTION BEHAVIOR OF VICTORIA BLUE DYE ON 3822 HALLOYSITE NANOTUBES FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS Pınar Turan Beyli
EFFECTS OF POTASSIUM SUPPLY ON PHYSIOLOGICAL 3831 PROPERTIES IN PEANUT UNDER ENHANCED ULTRAVIOLET-B RADIATION Yan Han, Yunsheng Lou, Chenguang Han, Meng Li and Chengda Hu
CHEMICAL, MICROBIAL AND PHYSICAL EVALUATION OF 3836 COMMERCIAL BOTTLED DRINKING WATER AVAILABLE IN BUSHEHR CITY, IRAN Elham Shabankareh Fard, Sina Dobaradaran and Roughayeh Hayati
EFFECTS OF CHLORPYRIFOS INSECTICIDE ON CYP1 FAMILY GENES EXPRESSION 3842 AND ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE ENZYME ACTIVITY IN ORYZIAS JAVANICUS Trieu Tuan, Yoshio Kaminishi, Aki Funahashi and Takao Itakura
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS, SOURCES AND HEALTH IMPACTS OF URBAN 3853 AMBIENT PM2.5 IN WUHAN DURING THE CHINESE SPRING FESTIVAL POLLUTION EPISODE Li Liu, Hui Hu, Yiping Tian, Nan Chen, Jihong Quan and Hong Liu
APPLICATION OF THE SELF-ORGANIZING MAP FOR AQUEOUS PHOSPHORUS 3865 MODELING AND MONITORING IN A NATURAL FRESHWATER WETLAND: A CASE STUDY Liang Zhang, Yanhua Zhuang and Yun Du
SHORT NOTE
EFFECTS OF ZINC AND CADMIUM ON CONDITION FACTOR, 3871 HEPATOSOMATIC AND GONADOSOMATIC INDEX OF Oreochromis niloticus Nuray Çiftçi, Özcan Ay, Fahri Karayakar, Bedii Cicik and Cahit Erdem
INDEX 3875
3694 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
THE USE OF DIFFERENT REACTOR SYSTEMS FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATERS
Lucija Foglar*, Sanja Papić, Dunja Margeta and Katica Sertić-Bionda
Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
ABSTRACT Furthermore, new technologies such as membrane technology [12, 13] and microwave-assisted catalytic wet In order to protect the environment and due to the strict air oxidation [14] are investigated. In general, these meth- regulations, harmful organic and inorganic compounds ods involve the transfer of pollutants from one medium to must be removed from refinery wastewaters. In this paper, another, thus requiring further treatment for complete re- the application of different reactor systems for biological moval of organic components. Some of these methods have treatment of petroleum refinery wastewaters was reviewed reduced efficiency, some generate sediments or sludge, and the performance of the different biological treatment whereas certain methods are performed in a narrow pH processes with suspended and immobilized biomass was range [15, 16], which limits their application. Therefore, described with emphasis on working parameters, such as the different bioreactor systems are still being investigated chemical oxygen demand (COD), organic load, hydraulic to achieve effective reduction of harmful organics present retention time, the presence of different carriers and micro- in refinery wastewaters. Biological treatment is the most organisms, the pH and the working temperature. Further- widely used treatment technologies for the removal of dis- more, some combined treatment processes were presented solved organic compounds from petroleum refining indus- and their use was analysed. According to the review of the try wastewater [17, 18]. The biological treatment can be literature data, it can be concluded that biological treat- classified into two main categories that include processes ment, with the selection of a suitable reactor system, fa- with suspended biomass and processes with immobilized vourable microorganisms and the optimal working param- biomass (Table 1.) eters, enables very efficient removal of organic substances present in the refinery wastewaters. TABLE 1 - Survey of different reactor systems and their abbrevia- tions used for the biological treatment of petroleum refinery
wastewaters. KEYWORDS: biological treatment, biomass, hydraulic retention time, chemical Reactor system Abbreviation oxygen demand, refinery wastewater, reactor systems Continuous flow suspended CSBR
biomass reactor 1. INTRODUCTION Up-flow anaerobic sludge blan- UASB ket bioreactor Reactors Sequencing batch reactors SBR The ever-increasing global energy demand makes the with suspended Membrane bioreactors MBR biomass growth processing and consumption of crude oil as raw material in Membrane sequencing batch re- MSBR petroleum industry important issue that significantly con- actors reactor tribute to pollution of water. The petroleum refinery and Wetlands ecosystems similar industries generate large volume of effluents which Active sludge reactor are discharged into water bodies [1, 2]. Such effluents con- Immobilized biological aerated IBAF tain many different substances including hydrocarbons, filters phenol, sulphides and other sulphur and nitrogen contain- Fluidised bed reactors FBR ing compounds. Numerous of these pollutants have ad- Fixed-film bioreactor system FFR verse effect on environment, especially on aquatic organ- Reactor with a biological aer- RBAF Reactors isms and therefore should be removed from wastewaters. ated filter with attached Trickling filter reactor The effective removal of these compounds with the use of biomass growth Rotating biological contactors RBC different physico-chemical and biological methods was in- Bio electrochemical reactor tensively studied during the last decade [3-11]. system Spouted bed bioreactor SBBR * Corresponding author Microbial electrolysis reactors
3695 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
Generally, the microorganisms use and degrade the or- activated sludge treatment study in which effectiveness in ganic components of the wastewater and form new micro- cleaning up a petrochemical wastewater in Iran was evalu- bial biomass and degradation products. In the reactor with ated. Bacterial strains mainly belonged to Pseudomonas, suspended growth, microorganisms are suspended in the Flavobacterium, Comamonas, Cytophaga, Acidovorax, solution with organic material and during the treatment Sphingomonas, Bacillus and Acinetobacter genera [20]. The form aggregated active biomass called activated sludge. use of different engineering bacteria was studied in a pilot- The process of biological treatment with activated sludge scale two-stage anoxic-oxic process of biological treatment is one of the most effective biological systems, used in of petrochemical wastewater under low temperatures [21]. many refineries around the world for biological wastewater The different types of suspended biomass reactors ap- treatment. Microorganisms use organic matter from refin- plied for the RWW treatment, the values of applied process ery wastewater (RWW) as a source of carbon and energy parameters, the process efficiency and literature data were for growth and development and simultaneously convert shown in Table 2. The RWW treatment was also conducted these substances in cell tissue, water and other oxidized in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket bioreactor - UASB [22]. products. In processes with immobilized biomass, micro- The operation of UASB includes anaerobic process with for- organisms are attached, bonded or immobilized to the inert mation a blanket of granular sludge which suspends in the carrier. The carriers, usually used in those processes are tank. Wastewater flows upwards through the blanket and is small rocks, gravel, plastic and other synthetic materials processed (degraded) by the anaerobic microorganisms. that have different size and properties that enable survival The monitoring of anaerobic RWW treatment from refin- and proliferation of microbes. [18]. ery in Teheran, Iran revealed 30-81% COD removal, with the highest efficiency observed at organic loading rate (OLR) of 0.4 kg/m3d and at hydraulic retention times (HRT) 2. APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENT REACTOR of 48 h. After preliminary investigations, the process optimi- SYSTEMS WITH SUSPENDED BIOMASS FOR sation model (response surface methodology) was applied to BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY predict the behaviours of influent COD, upflow velocity and WASTEWATERS HRT in the bioreactor and the determined optimal range of process performance was 630 mg/dm3, 0.27 m/h, and 21.4 h The most commonly used process that includes sus- respectively, at which was achieved 76.3% COD removal pended biomass is treatment in batch and continuous-flow efficiency [22]. reactors with activated sludge, and very often for treatment of RWW sequencing batch reactors and membrane biore- The batch reactors that have different sequences such as actors were applied. Furthermore, suspended biomass pro- fill/settling/decant during operation are in basic a modifica- cesses include the treatment in aerated lagoons and sys- tion of the traditional activated sludge processes are known tems, which are constructed as wetlands ecosystem [18]. as sequencing batch reactors - SBR [23]. The SBR technol- ogy is becoming more popular as an alternative for treating During the treatment, refinery wastewater entering the industrial wastewater due to use of a single unit, production aeration tank with microorganisms (reactor). To maintain of reduced amount of sludge, low aeration costs, minimal the structure of the aerobic active sludge and a homoge- footprint, and flexible operation and control [24-26]. nous suspension of microbes with solids present in the so- lution, air is continuously introduced into reactor. In gen- In a recently published paper [27], sequencing batch eral, in the RWW treatment systems, the biomass in the reactor was used for treatment of petroleum refinery waste- mixture of wastewater and sludge (mixed liquor suspended water (Kuala Lumpur) and the effects of toxic, hydraulic, solids, MLSS) contain 70-90% of active organic portion of and organic shocks on the performance of a lab-scale SBR the biomass (mixed liquor volatile suspended solids, were investigated. The results of this study indicate that with MLVSS) and 10-30% inert solids [18]. The treatment of an OLR in the range of 0.53-0.93 kg COD/kg MLSS d, COD RWW from six different refineries with use of the activated removal efficiency was 86-68.9% (Table 2). During the sludge was recently studied in the United States [17]. The toxic shock tests, it was observed that addition of 10 and +6 3 observed results suggest that the treatment was effective in 20 mg Cr /dm decrease efficiency to 79.4% and 77.1% reducing the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and the respectively, but the process regained stability and effi- naphthenic acid concentration. Furthermore, it was note- ciency increased to 86%. On the contrary, the simultaneous worthy that a significant toxicity reduction was achieved application of increased OLR and decreased HRT caused a by the biological treatment units in all six refineries. Simi- loss of biomass activity, biomass wash out and system fail- larly, Mizzouri and Shaaban [19] monitored the kinetics of ure [27]. degradation of RWW in continuous flow suspended bio- In addition to the above mentioned reactor systems, in a mass reactor (CSBR) and 89.9-96.5% reduction in COD recently published study [28] the possibility of RWW treat- was observed. The identification of bacteria present in bi- ment was investigated in the reactor system which combines omass indicated that prevailed bacteria Pseudomonas upward flow anaerobic sludge bioreactor (UASB) with and putida, Acidovorax delafieldii and Aeromonas hydrophila. immobilized biological aerated filters (IBAF). The pilot plant Furthermore, in recent investigation 67 different aerobic was set up in the vicinity of the oil fields and COD, ammonia bacterial cultures were isolated and identified during the concentration, suspended solids, and presence and degra-
3696 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
TABLE 2 - The literature review of different types of suspended biomass reactors applied for the RWW treatment with processing parameters and the process efficiency data.
OLR*/ pH COD removal Microorganisms/ HRT Reactor system efficiency Reference Carrier (h) COD** T (°C) (%) 7-7.6 Active sludge reactor Refinery waste sludge 24.17-75.6 17 467-1117(700) 22-24 0.177-0.744 19,2- CSBR Mixed culture 89.9-96.5 19 25,6 0.2-1.2 6.5-7.7/ UASB Waste sludge 10-48 30-81 22 500-1200 38±1 0.3-0.93 6.7-7.3 SBR Active sludge 12,8-4,8 75-95 27 920-1620 27±2 Combination of Active sludge (UASB) 7.8-8.3 UASB and IBAF and commercial culture 40-12 20-90 28 reactor 129.8-1238 (IBAF)/Policin urepan 25-35 /COD:616±231 Active sludge / 15-79 8.0 MBR /COD:1010±45 Membrane- polyeth- 10 48-77 29 /COD:765±187 erimide fibers 25 41-69 30-65 mg/d 16 93.8-94.3 Active sludge (3000 mg 6-8 20 94-95 (160-2300)103 MLSS/L) 33 94.5-95.5 MBR 12 24-67 mg/d / 17 93.5-94 Active sludge (5000 mg 22 93.5-94.5 (370-2300)103 MLSS/L) 34 94.7-95.8 ***Toluene: 25 Active sludge / 8 Removal of CH: MSBR Etilbenzene: 25 Poletilen mikrofiltration 16 30 27±1 97 Nonane: 25-3000 module 24 COD:165-347 Sand-gravel 8-10.5 45-78 Wetlands ecosystems Phenol: 3-9 34 Oil and grease: 24-66 Sand-compost 5-20 33-62 OLR*-organic loading rate (kg COD/kg MLSS/d) COD**-influent COD (mg COD/dm3) ***Concentration of different hydrocarbons (CH) (mg/dm3)
dation of alkanes were monitored during 252 days. The re- 3000 mg MLSS/dm3 and 5000 mg MLSS/dm3 was efficient duction of COD, NH3-N concentration and the reduction in and 82-97% reduction in COD was observed. The highest ef- suspended solids were 74%, 94% and 98% respectively ficiency of more than 95% was achieved at HRT of 34 h [12]. (Table 2). The analysis of the samples determined that most of the alkali compounds decomposed in the UASB-reactor, In addition to the above mentioned membrane system, in a recent survey [30], the effect of different HRT on the while the IBAF has an important role in the degradation of course of RWW treatment was determined in membrane other organic compounds and in reduction of NH3-N and suspended solids. Analysis of biomass indicated that in the sequencing batch reactors reactor (MSBR). Stages of oper- ation of these reactors, depending on HRT (8, 16 and 24 h) UASB reactor dominated bacteria belonging to the genera Bacillales and Rhodobacterales, while in the IBAF prevail were filling phase - 11 min, the reaction phase (149, 389 and presence of an unidentified bacterial species [28]. 629 min), and drawing phase - 80 min. The process was monitored at 27 ± 1 °C and the prepared RWW contained Membrane bioreactors (MBR) are biological treatment mineral salts necessary for the optimal growth and develop- methods that represent the variation of application acti- ment of the microbial biomass and toluene, ethylbenzene vated sludge system. MBR combines membrane process and nonane as hydrocarbon components. Although the in- (eg. microfiltration) with suspended growth biomass [18]. crease of HRT from 8 h to 16 h and then to 24 h had resulted Application of MBR for RWW treatment [29] was studied in a statistically significant reduction in the value of MLSS, at different OLR and HRT of 10 h at 25 °C for 93 days and it was observed that the hydrocarbon removal efficiency was the results suggest the effective removal of organic matter more than 97% (Table 2) [30]. The SBR technology was (Table 2). The comparison of the results obtained with the used for treatment of RWW in other studies and effective use of MBR, with the results observed only with the use of reduction of COD was also observed [31, 32]. biomass, indicated that the application of the membrane in- creased COD removal and total organic carbon (TOC) re- Wetlands ecosystems can be designed as natural and moval efficiency for 17% and 20% respectively [29]. With engineered ecosystems, the natural wetland ecosystems are the application of cross flow membrane bioreactor [12] mainly used to remove suspended solids, nitrogen, phos- treatment of RWW at HRT of 16-34 h, in the presence of phorus, trace elements and microorganisms present in
3697 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
wastewater, while the constructed wetlands are used for mass, under unsteady and steady state conditions. The waste- treatment of municipal, industrial and agricultural waste- water and air stream were introduced at the bottom of re- water [33]. In order to explore the practical application of actor to achieve efficient fluidization and obtained results constructed wetland for RWW treatment, the performance indicated complete removal of diesel fuel (100%) and 90- of two parallel wetlands ecosystems and their effectiveness 97% reduction of COD [40]. The use of different types of were monitored in Pakistan [34]. Two identically engi- attached growth processes in the RWW treatment along neered wetland ecosystems contained different filter media with values of applied process parameters and process ef- (sand/compost and sand/gravel) and planted marsh cane ficiency are reviewed and listed in Table 3. shoots. In the first period, the growth of plants was moni- The aerobic treatment of RWW in a three-phase fluid- tored with the addition of fresh water, then the flow of ised bed bioreactor with polypropylene KMT® particles RWW was initiated and after a period of adjustment, the used as a biomass support was investigated at various ratios efficiency of this system was investigated. The COD re- of bed (settled) volume to bioreactor volume (Vb/VR) and at moval efficiency amounted to 45-78% for the system with different air velocities and the optimal COD removals of sand/compost and 33-62% for the system of sand/gravel. 90% was achieved at Vb/VR ratio of 0.55 and at air veloci- The reduction of total suspended solids in the wetlands was ties of 0.029 m/s [43]. A similar reactor system was used 48-73% in a system with sand/compost and 39-58% in the for RWW treatment in pilot study [45], and aerobic degra- system of sand/gravel (Table 2). In addition, an effective dation was conducted in the bioreactor containing 7 fixed reduction of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and the re- tubes placed in main reactor tube, and spherical particles duction of heavy metal concentrations were observed. Re- made of synthetic resin was used as biomass carrier. The sults of this study indicate that the use of wetlands ecosys- wastewater and air was pumped at the bottom of bioreactor tems enables effective reduction of the COD and BOD val- to enable aeration and fluidisation of carrier particles. The ues of RWW, and also enables significant reduction in the influences of pH value, air flow rate and HRT on COD and concentration of heavy metals such as Fe, Cu and Zn. [34]. ammonia nitrogen reductions were monitored and revealed Treatment of RWW in ecosystem designed as wetlands has that the optimum operation conditions were obtained at air been investigated in other studies and observed results in- flow rate of 3.2 m3 air /m3 liquid h, at HRT of 6.5 h and at dicated that the removal of harmful substances from the pH value of 7.0-8.0 (Table 3). Under the optimal operation RWW could be achieved with application of wetlands [35]. condition, during more than 40 days, the effluent COD and 3 NH4-N were lower than 100 and 15 mg/dm , respectively and the overall efficiency clearly exceeded the values ob- 3. BIOLOCGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY tained by traditional methods of wastewater degradation. WASTEWATER IN REACTOR SYSTEMS WITH Furthermore, this pilot-bioreactor generated only one- ATTACHED BIOMASS third of the sludge waste compared to the traditional acti- vated sludge process. The processes with reactor systems that contain mi- Biological treatment of industrial oil refinery waste-wa- crobes attached, entrapped or immobilised on carrier, are ter is a well-established method for removal of organics but generally called attached growth processes. The carriers of in order to increase efficiency a new bioreactor system was microbes could be as mentioned sand, gravel, clay or zeo- designed and studied [46]. A fixed-film bioreactor system lite particles, hydro gels such as carrageenans and Ca-algi- (FFR) was constructed in order to allow higher organic nates, polymer granules and numerous different plastic or loads, to minimize production of sludge waste by-products synthetic materials. The use of small, porous, fluidized me- and to increase process stability and resistance to shock load- dia in the reactor enables the retaining of biomass and op- ing. The fixed-film bioreactor pilot unit was equipped with eration at reduced HRTs. In dependence to performance of a 4-chamber horizontal tank, the support frame was built the process there are different types of batch and continu- from cylindrical plastic pall rings to form a packed bed of ous flow reactors, which in correlation to flow could be re- ‘mixed-media’ and highly porous polyurethane foam was actors with fixed or fluidised bed with or without mixing. used to incubate microorganisms. Monitoring of input/out- The fluidised bed reactors (FBR) were intensively used put values of COD and phenols indicate 85-90% removal and investigated for efficient removal of diverse organic pol- of COD and complete reduction of phenols [46]. In this pa- lutants [36-39]. These reactor systems seems to be more ef- per a conventional treatment with activated sludge was also ficient than suspended biomass reactors since they enable monitored and reduction of COD and degradation of phe- process performance without mechanical moving parts, at nol yielded 50-60% and 99% respectively. The comparison higher concentration of biomass, at lower HRT and the of the results observed with FFR and conventional treat- footprint requirements are small [40]. Literature data sug- ment indicate that FFR during treatment generated only 1/3 gest that aerobic biodegradation by natural populations of of sludge waste produced during a conventional treatment microorganisms was a favourable for effective degradation [46]. Among many various systems even a reactor with a of diesel fuel [41-44]. In recently conducted study [40], biological aerated filter (RBAF) has been studied for treat- aerobic biological degradation of wastewater contaminated ment of RWW [47]. The performance of two aerobic, up- with diesel fuel was carried out in a three-phase fluidized flow, submerged polymethyl methacrylate reactors with bed reactor with lava rock particles used as support for bio- poly-ammoniacal carriers and two different commercial cul-
3698 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
tures of microorganisms (B350M and B350) were monitored degrade the organics. A trickling bed biofilm reactor at OLR of 0.4-1.07 kg/m3d and at different HRT (20-4 h) and packed with siliceous granular material (PORAVER parti- 83-99% reduction in COD was achieved. By monitoring of cles) was used to evaluate phenol and total organic carbon the RBAF treatment during 142 days and comparing the removal efficiencies by Pseudomonas putida DSM 548 results, a higher efficiency was observed in bioreactor with [48]. In another study, two identical biotrickling filters immobilized B350M culture (Table 3). Furthermore, the were loaded with aluminosilicate beads (molecular sieve) monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons concen- and polyurethane foam as filter media to compare the tolu- trations revealed that in both reactors their concentrations ene removal efficiency after seeding with Bacillus cereus were reduced and the efficiency of degradation in reactors S1 and based on observed higher removal capacity of tolu- with B350M and B350 cultures amounted 90% and 84% ene and shorter recovery time, aluminosilicate beads are respectively [47]. Additionally, analysis of microbial com- reported as a better choice than the polyurethane foam for munity proved presence of 20 different bacteria in the re- packing material used for biotrickling filter [49]. actor with B350M culture and only 13 different bacteria in In practice, submerged biofilm filter systems including the reactor with B350 culture, indicating that the reactor rotating biological contactors (RBC) are also used for inoculated with B350M achieves richer diversity than that RWW treatment. The RBC consists of closely spaced pol- with B350. ystyrene or polyvinyl chloride plastic discs mounted on a The trickling filter reactor system usually consisting horizontal shaft. The plastic discs are submerged in the distributors for spraying the influent wastewater to the wastewater and are continuously rotated by the horizontal surface of the filter bed, a bed of packing material such as shaft through an air driven motor. Microorganisms adhere rock or plastic on which the wastewater is distributed con- to the plastic surface and form a layer of microbial biomass tinuously and an under drain system that carried out treated (slime) on the discs. As the discs are rotating, the attached water. A slime layer of microorganisms develops on the microorganisms react and degrade the contaminants in the packing material of the trickling filter. As wastewater wastewater and convert them to new biomass and oxidation passes through the trickling filter bed, the microorganisms products, and the excess of sludge is sloughed off the discs.
TABLE 3 The review of process parameters used in different types of attached biomass growth processes during the RWW treatment and observed process efficiency.
COD removal OLR*/ Microorganisms/ pH HRT Reactor system efficiency Reference Carrier (h) COD** T (°C) (%) 6.7-7.8 90-97 547-4025 FBR Lava rock particles 4 h [40] 96 200 and 1237 diesel: 100% 6.5-7.0 Polypropylene KMT® FBR 90-95 [43] particles 45000 28-30
Polypropylene parti- 6.5-7.0 FBR 3.33-30 40-95 [44] 36650 cles 28-30 7-8 FBR Syntic resin 6.5 > 53-84 [45] 215-613 25-35 6.0-8.5 16 85-90 FFR 510±401.9 Polyurethane foam [46] 15-39 8 phenol: 100 Phenol***: 30±6.2 0.4-1.07 Commercial culture 8.0 B350 and B350M / RBAF 20-4 83-99 [47] 124 Polyamoniacal mate- 18-24 rial 27,33 g/m2d Burkholderia cepacia 7.5 24 97.19-78.56 RBC and phototrophic mi- [51] 21 84.6-97.8 2677,30-5406,38 croorganisms 28±2 7,2-8,2 COD: 97 Combined reactor Pseudonymous putida 30 and ambi- phenol: 100 [53] system 3600-5300 /Polyvinyl alcohol gel ent T Cresol: 100 Microbial electrol- Mixed culture present 7.2-8.9 40-79 [54] ysis cells 136-1400 in RWW 30 OLR*-organic loading rate (kg COD/kg MLSS/d) COD**-influent COD (mg COD/dm3) ***Concentration of different hydrocarbons (CH) (mg/dm3)
3699 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
The basic advantages of RBC over other types of filter re- RWW sample or a mixture of RWW with domestic actors are that the addition of oxygen isn’t required and wastewater in microbial electrolysis cells resulted in 79% process is not dependent on the concentration of oxygen in reduction of COD and 82% reduction of BOD values. the water, furthermore, the microorganisms are attached to the surface of the disc and thus clogging of the filter are very rare, and process performance have a small energy re- 4. CONCLUSIONS quirements. Biodegradability of RWW was investigated in laboratory scale by applying the modified RBC with poly- According to the literature data on the performance of urethane foam [50]. Degradation of RWW was monitored the biological treatment of refinery wastewaters, the selec- in two parallel-connected RBC at various input hydraulic tion of an appropriate reactor system and selection of fa- loads (from 0.01 to 0.04 m3/m2d) with a rotation speed of vourable conditions of the process implementation, as well 10 rpm, and the efficiency of COD and the oil reduction as the selection of suitable microorganisms can signifi- was greater than 87% and 80%, respectively. Additionally, cantly affect the efficiency of the biological treatment of observed removal of NH3-N and phenol was 99% and 85% RWW. The presented and reviewed data indicated that respectively [50]. Application of RBC was also investi- among suspended growth bioreactor, the application of gated for treatment of wastewater containing diesel oil and membrane bioreactors is very efficient and provides more the presence of bacteria Burkholderia cepacia and cyano- than 93% reduction of COD, but the use of immobilized bacteria (Phormidium, Chroococcus and Oscillatoria) was cells also resulted in a very high efficiency of the process, determined [51]. After the formation of biofilm and the pe- particularly in the fluidized bed reactor system, in which riod of adjustment, in the outlet stream, the presence of up to 96% COD removal efficiency is observed. In addi- only 0.003% of residual diesel was determined. The effec- tion, application of the combined reactor system consisted tiveness of wastewater treatment was monitored at differ- of electro coagulation cell, fluidized bed reactor and ad- ent N:P ratios (19:1 to 47.4:1), and at HRT of 21 h, at OLR sorption column, also provides 97% reduction of COD and of 27.33 g/m2d. The observed reduction of the COD was the 100% removal of phenol and cresol. 84-97.8% and the reduction efficiency of the total petro- The treatment of RWW is significantly affected by op- leum hydrocarbons was more than 99% (Table 3). Further- erational parameters such as temperature, pH and HRT. more, the association of B. cepacia and phototrophic mi- The analysis of the data presented, indicate that the treat- croorganisms at a reactor scale was reported as favourable ment of RWW are mainly conducted at the pH neutral or for hydrocarbon degradation. The major advantages of this close to neutral (pH 6.0-8.9) and at temperatures of 25-35 RBC system apart from high total petroleum hydrocarbons °C, which are the values that enable optimal growth and removal efficiency include good settleability of sludge, development of microorganisms that can degrade organic low phosphorus requirement, no soluble carbon source re- substances present in the RWW. The comparison of differ- quirement and pH stability. Thus, although RBCs were ent reactor system with suspended and immobilized bio- commonly used for treatment of low-strength wastewater, mass, the comparison of process efficiency and the HRT RBCs utilizing the association of phototrophic microor- values provide reliable observation that the effectiveness ganisms and bacteria can effectively treat wastewater with of the process is higher, and HRT is mostly lower in the high organic loading. The RBC was investigated for possi- reactor systems with immobilized biomass, which contrib- 2 ble biodegradation of toluene at OLR of 1.5-0.6 g/m d and utes to the cost-effective removal of harmful pollutants observed reduction of COD ranged from 77 to 88.3% [52]. from refinery wastewaters during the biological treatment. Application of different bio electrochemical system, and in particular, the application of combined reactor sys- The authors have declared no conflict of interest. tems in the treatment and purification of wastewater, could result in effective removal of suspended solids, oil and grease [53]. A novel three-step process was developed and REFERENCES evaluated for the treatment of highly contaminated refinery wastewater. The process consisted of an electro-coagula- [1] Wake, H., (2005) Oil refineries: a review of their ecological tion cell (EC), a spouted bed bioreactor (SBBR) with Pseu- impacts on the aquatic environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 62, 131–140. donymous putida immobilized in polyvinyl alcohol gel, and an adsorption column packed with granular activated [2] Diyauddeen, B.H., Wan Daud, W.M.A. and Aziz, A.R.A. (2010) Treatment technologies for petroleum refinery efflu- carbon produced from agricultural waste. During opera- ents: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, tion, the samples from each of the output stream were ana- 89, 95–105. lyzed and the concentrations of phenol, cresol and COD [3] El-Naas, M.H., Al-Zuhair, S., Al-Lobaney, A. and Makhlouf, were determined and 100% removal of phenol and cresol, S. (2009) Assessment of electrocoagulation for the treatment and 97% reduction of COD was achieved (Table 3). Mi- of petroleum refinery wastewater. Journal of Environmental crobial electrolysis reactors in which the anode is graphite Management, 91, 180–185. plate and cathode is a mesh of stainless steel have been [4] Pardeshi, S.K. and Patil, A.B. (2008) A simple route for pho- used in a recent paper for the treatment of various RWW tocatalytic degradation of phenol in aqueous zinc oxide sus- [54]. In anaerobic batch conditions, the introduction of the pension using solar energy. Solar Energy, 82, 700–705.
3700 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
[5] Xu, X. and Zhu, X., (2004) Treatment of refectory oily [22] Rastegar, S.O., Mousavi, S.M., Shojaosadati, S.A. and wastewater by electro-coagulation process. Chemosphere, 56, Sheibani, S. (2011) Optimization of petroleum refinery efflu- 889–894. ent treatment in a UASB reactor using response surface meth- odology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 197, 26–32. [6] Abdelwahab, O., Amin, N.K. and El-Ashtoukhy, E.-S.Z. (2009) Electrochemical removal of phenol from oil refinery [23] Suresh, S., Tripathi, R.K. and Gernal Rana M. (2011) Review wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163, 711–716. on treatment of industrial wastewater using sequential batch reactor. International Journal of Technology Management, 2, [7] Yang, S., Zhu, W., Wang, J. and Chen, Z. (2008) Catalytic wet 64–84. air oxidation of phenol over CeO2–TiO2 catalyst in the batch reactor and the packed-bed reactor. Journal of Hazardous Ma- [24] US EPA (1999) Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet: Sequenc- terials, 153, 1248–1253. ing Batch Reactor, 832-F-99-073, US EPA, Washington DC. [8] Altas, L. and Büyükgüngör, H. (2008) Sulfide removal in pe- [25] Gerardi, M.H. (2009) Troubleshooting the Sequencing Batch troleum refinery wastewater by chemical precipitation. Journal Reactor, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey. of Hazardous Materials, 153, 462–469. [26] Shammas, N.K., Wang, L.K., Pereira, N.C. and Hung, Y.T. [9] Hami, M.L., Al-Hashimib, M.A. and Al-Dooric, M.M. (2007) (2009) Biological treatment processes. Handbook of Environ- Effect of activated carbon on BOD and COD removal in a dis- mental Engineering, 8, The Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey. solved air flotation unit treating refinery wastewater. Desali- nation, 216, 116–122. [27] Mizzouri, N.S. and Shaaban, M.G. (2013) Individual and com- bined effects of organic, toxic, and hydraulic shocks on se- [10] Santos, F.V., Azevedo, E.B., Sant’Anna Jr., G.L. and Dezotti, quencing batch reactor in treating petroleum refinery M. (2006) Photocatalysis as a tertiary treatment for petroleum wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 250-251, 333– refinery wastewaters. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineer- 344. ing, 23, 450–460. [28] Liu, G., Ye, Z., Tong, K. and Zhang, Y. (2013) Biotreatment [11] Ma, F., Guo, J.-B., Zhao, L.-J., Chang, C.-C. and Cui, D. (2009) of heavy oil wastewater by combined upflow anaerobic sludge Application of bioaugmentation to improve the activated sludge blanket and immobilized biological aerated filter in a pilot- system into the contact oxidation system treating petrochemical scale test. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 72, 48–53. wastewater, Bioresource Technology 100, 597–602. [29] Viero, A.F., de Melo, T.M., Torres, A.P.R., Ferreira, N.R., [12] Rahman, M.M.and Al-Malack, M.H. (2006) Performance of a Sant’Anna Jr., G.L., Borges, C.P. and Santiago, V.M.J. (2008) crossflow membrane bioreactor (CF–MBR) when treating re- The effects of long-term feeding of high organic loading in a finery wastewater. Desalination, 191, 16–263. submerged membrane bioreactor treating oil refinery wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science, 319, 223 –230. [13] Li, Y., Yan, L., Xiang, C. and Hong, L.J. (2006) Treatment of oily wastewater by organic–inorganic composite tubular ultra- [30] Shariati, S.R.P., Bonakdarpour, B., Zare, N. and Ashtiani, F.Z. filtration (UF) membranes. Desalination, 196, 76–83. (2011) The effect of hydraulic retention time on the perfor- mance and fouling characteristics of membrane sequencing [14] Sun, Y., Zhang, Y. and Quan, X. (2008) Treatment of petro- batch reactors used for the treatment of synthetic petroleum leum refinery wastewater by microwave-assisted catalytic wet refinery wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 102, 7692– air oxidation under low temperature and low pressure. Separa- 7699. tion and Purification Technology, 62, 565–570. [31] Lee, L.Y., Hu, J.Y., Ong, S.L., Ng, W.J., Ren, J.H. and Wong, [15] Laoufi, N.A., Tassalit, D. and Bentahar, F. (2008) The degra- S.H. (2004) Two-stage SBR for treatment of oil refinery dation of phenol in water solution by TiO2 photocatalyst in a wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 50, 243–249. chemical reactor. Global NEST Journal, 10, 404–418. [32] Hudson, N., Doyle, J., Lant, P., Roach, N., de Bruyn, B. and [16] Kuyukina, M.S., Ivshina, I.R., Serebrennikova, M.K., Krivo- Staib, C. (2001) Sequencing batch reactor technology: the key rutchko, A.B., Podorozhko, E.A., Ivanov, R.V. and Lozinsky, to a BP refinery (Bulwer Island) upgraded environmental pro- V.I. (2009) Petroleum-contaminated water treatment in a fluid- tection system – A low cost lagoon based retro-fit. Water Sci- ized-bed bioreactor with immobilized Rhodococcus cells. Inter- ence and Technology, 43, 339–346. national Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 63, 427–432. [33] Pardue M.J., Castle J.W., Rodgers J.H.Jr. and Huddleston III, [17] Misiti, T., Tezel, U.and Pavlostathis, S.G. (2013) Fate and ef- G.M. (2014) Treatment of oil and grease in produced water by fect of naphthenic acids on oil refinery activated sludge a pilot-scale constructed wetland system using biogeochemi- wastewater treatment systems. Water Research, 47, 449–460. cal processes. Chemosphere, 103, 67–73. [18] IPIECA (2010) Petroleum refinery waste management and [34] Aslam, M.M., Malik, M., Baig, M.A., Qazi, I.A. and Iqbal, J. minimization An IPIECA Good Practice Guide, IPIECA, Lon- (2007) Treatment performances of compost-based and gravel- don, UK [available at: http://www.ipieca.org; 28.04.2014.] based vertical flow wetlands operated identically for refinery wastewater treatment in Pakistan. Ecological Engineering, 30, [19] Mizzouri, N.S. and Shaaban, G. (2013) Kinetic and hydrody- 34–42. namic assessment of an aerobic purification system for petro- leum refinery wastewater treatment in a continuous regime. [35] Simi, A.L., Mitchell, C.A. (1999) Design and hydraulic per- International. Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 83, 1–9. formance of a constructed wetland treating oil refinery wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 40, 301–307. [20] Shokrollahzadeh, S., Azizmohseni, F., Golmohammad, F., Shokouhi, H. and Khademhaghighat, F. (2008) Biodegrada- [36] Sutton, P.M., Mishra, P.N. (1994) Activated carbon based bi- tion potential and bacterial diversity of a petrochemical ological fluidized beds for contaminated water and wastewater wastewater treatment plant in Iran. Bioresource Technology, treatment: A state of the art review. Water Science and Tech- 99, 6127–6133. nology, 29, 309–317. [21] Zhao, L., Ma, F., Guo, J. and Zhao, Q. (2007) Petrochemical [37] Buchtmann, C., Kies, U., Deckwer, W.D. and Hecht, V. (1997) wastewater treatment with a pilot-scale bioaugmented biolog- Performance of three phase fluidized bed reactor for quinoline ical treatment system. Journal of Zhejiang University Science degradation on various supports at steady state and dynamic A, 8, 1831–1838. conditions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 56, 295–303.
3701 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
[38] Haribabu, K. and Sivasubramanian, V. (2014) Treatment of Wastewater in Fluidized Bed Bioreactor Using Low Density Biosupport. Energy Procedia, 50, 214–221.
[39] Gonzales, G., Herrera, G., Garcia, Ma.T. and Pena M. (2001) Biodegradation of phenolic wastewater in a fluidized bed bio- reactor with immobilized cells of Pseudomonas putida. Biore- source Technology, 80, 137–142. [40] Lohi, A., Alvarez Cuenca, M., Anania, G., Upreti, S.R., and Wan, L. (2008) Biodegradation of diesel fuel-contaminated wastewater using a three-phase fluidized bed reactor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, 105–111. [41] Margesin, R. and Schinner, F. (1997) Bioremediation of diesel fuel-oil-contaminated alpine soils at low temperature. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 47, 462–468. [42] Erikson, M., Swartling, A. and Dalhammar, G. (1998) Biolog- ical degradation of diesel fuel in water and soil monitored with solid-phase micro-extraction and GC–MS. Applied Microbi- ology and Biotechnology, 50, 129–134. [43] Sokol, W. (2003) Treatment of refinery wastewater in a three- phase fluidised bed bioreactor with a low density biomass sup- port. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 15, 1–10.
[44] Sokół, W., Ambawb, A. and Woldeyes, B. (2009) Biological wastewater treatment in the inverse fluidised bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 150, 63–68.
[45] Xianling, L., Jianping, W., Qing, Y. and Xueming, Z. (2005) The pilot study for oil refinery wastewater treatment using a gas–liquid–solid three-phase flow airlift loop bioreactor. Bio- chemical Engineering Journal, 27, 40–44.
[46] Jou, C.J.G. and Huang, G.C. (2003) A pilot study for oil refin- ery wastewater treatment using a fixed-film bioreactor. Ad- vances in Environmental Research, 7, 463–469.
[47] Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Ye, Z., Borthwick, A.G.L. and Ni, J. (2006) Oil field wastewater treatment in Biological Aerated Filter by immobilized microorganisms. Process Biochemistry, 41, 1475–1483. [48] Sá, C.S.A. and Boaventura, R.A.R. (2001) Biodegradation of phenol by Pseudomonas putida DSM 548 in a trickling bed reactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 9, 211–219. [49] He, Z., Zhou, L., Li, G., Zeng, X., An, T., Sheng, G., Fu, J. and Bai, Z. (2009) Comparative study of the eliminating of waste gas containing toluene in twin biotrickling filters packed with molecular sieve and polyurethane foam. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167, 275–281.
[50] Tyagi, R.D., Tran, F.T. and Chowdhury, A.K.M.M. (1993) Bi- odegradation of petroleum refinery wastewater in a modified Received: November 26, 2014 rotating biological contactor with polyurethane foam attached Revised: March 30, 2015 to the disks. Water Research, 27, 91–99. Accepted: April 24, 2015 [51] Chavan, A. and Mukherji, S. (2008) Treatment of hydrocar- bon-rich wastewater using oil degrading bacteria and photo- trophic microorganisms in rotating biological contactor: Effect of N:P ratio. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, 63–72. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR [52] Alemzadeh, I. and Vossoughi, M. (2001) Biodegradation of Lucija Foglar toluene by an attached biofilm in a rotating biological contac- tor, Process Biochemistry, 36, 707–711. Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology University of Zagreb [53] El-Naas, M.H., Alhaija, M.A. and Al-Zuhair, S. (2014) Eval- Marulićev trg 19 uation of a three-step process for the treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater. Journal of Environmental Chemical En- 10000 Zagreb gineering, 2, 56–62. CROATIA
[54] Ren, L., Siegert, M., Ivanov, I., Pisciotta, J.M. and Logan, B.E. (2013) Treatability studies on different refinery wastewater E-mail: [email protected] samples using high-throughput microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). Bioresource Technology, 136, 322–328. FEB/ Vol 24/ No 11a/ 2015 – pages 3695 - 3702
3702 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
A REVIEW OF AGRO-FOOD WASTE TRANSFORMATION INTO FEEDSTOCK FOR USE IN FERMENTATION
Paulina Gutiérrez-Macías, Brenda Montañez-Barragán and Blanca E. Barragán-Huerta*
Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas. Departamento de Ingeniería en Sistemas Ambientales. Av. Wilfrido Massieu S/N, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos, CP 07739, México D.F. México
ABSTRACT tainable development based on the concept of biorefinery has produced alternatives that facilitate waste recovery [4,5]. Food processing by-products and wastes are generated The International Energy Agency [6] defines the term from direct consumption or industrialization of primary biorefinery as “the sustainable processing of biomass into products that are no longer useful for food processing. Cur- a spectrum of marketable products (e.g., food, feed, mate- rently, in several developing countries there is insufficient rials, and chemicals) and energy (e.g., fuel, power, and infrastructure, technology, financial resources, and specific heat)”. There are several crops that are mainly used as feed- legislation to facilitate proper disposal and provide a final stock for biorefinery (perennial grasses, starch, sugarcane, destination for the waste, which can create pollution. Sus- oil, and forestry wastes), but the utilization of by-products tainable development based on the concept of biorefinery from the food industry has recently increased, because they has produced alternatives that facilitate waste recovery. are rich in nutrients and their reuse could also solve prob- The food processing by-products can be transformed into lems related to their disposal [7,8]. biomaterials or biofuels by fermentation; however, the The use of biomass as part of the biorefinery system in- main limitation is availability of fermentable compounds volves a series of sequential processes, including its prepa- because of the complex chemical structure of biomass. For ration and transformation into products of interest [9]. In that reason, some pretreatments are initially applied to the most cases, pretreating the biomass is required to increase biomass to increase the degree of saccharification and ob- the availability of its components and obtain fermentable sub- tain fermentable sugars. Recent advances in technology de- strates that are used for direct or indirect production of biofuel veloped for utilizing food biomass waste for production of and/or biomaterials [10]. Thus, hydrolysis efficiency is meas- fermentable sugars focusing in treatment conditions and ured in terms of free sugars (e.g., glucose, xylose, and galac- the limitations of each are discussed in this review. tose) and fermentation inhibitors [e.g., furfural and hydroxy- methylfurfural (HMF) yields].
KEYWORDS: biorefinery, pretreatment, biomass, lignocellulosic, food waste 2. BIOMASS COMPOSITION
Lignocellulosic biomass is mainly composed of cellu- 1. INTRODUCTION lose (38–50%), hemicellulose (23–32%), and lignin (10– 25%) [11, 12]. Cellulose is a homopolymer composed of Processed agro-food waste materials, both in solid and glucose monomers that are linked by glycoside bonds β- liquid form, are generated from the direct consumption or 1and β-4 [13]. Most of the glucose present in the lignocellu- industrialization of primary products that are no longer use- losic biomass is a component of the cellulose, which is a pol- ful for food processing [1]. This waste is mainly utilized as ymer that is hard to hydrolyze because of its crystalline and animal feed and compost or is disposed of in landfills; how- linear conformation. Moreover, it is surrounded by hemicel- ever, it is rich in chemical components with commercial lulose and lignin that further hinder its hydrolysis [14]. interest that can be obtained by extraction or transfor- mation to generate valuable products [2]. Hemicellulose is a heteropolymer that is constituted by pentoses (D-xylose and L-arabinose), hexoses (D-glucose, The problems associated with agro-food processing D-mannose and D-galactose), and uronic acids, such as D- wastes include insufficient technology, financial resources, glucuronic acid, D-galacturonic acid, and galacturonic acid and specific legislation to provide an appropriate destination methyl esters [15]. Because of its amorphous structure, for the wastes [3]. To ensure proper management from gen- multiple branching, and relatively low molecular weight, eration to disposal, these problems need to be addressed. Sus- hemicellulose is easier to hydrolyze than cellulose [16].
But, because the diversity of sugars, it requires a wide range * Corresponding author of enzymes to complete hydrolysis of the biomass [17].
3703 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
The third major component of lignocellulosic biomass can incorporate combinations of different pretreatment clas- is lignin, which is composed of multiple units of three alkyl sifications [24, 36]. phenols: p-coumaryl, coniferyl, and sinapil, which can be solubilized and inhibit fermentation process at different 3.1 Physical pretreatments grade [18]. This polymer is tightly bound to cellulose and Physical pretreatments are mainly applied to increase hemicellulose, making them less accessible to hydrolysis the surface area, reduce particle size, degree of polymeriza- [19, 20]. Because of the large quantity of sugars in the lig- tion and crystallinity of the lignocellulosic material [18, 37]. nocellulosic biomass, it is an excellent source of fermentable The energy required in these pretreatments is relatively high materials. Moreover, lignocellulosic components of some and depends on the desired particle size and biomass char- food processing by-products, such as citrus peels, contain a acteristics [38]. However, very small particle sizes may sub- high content of essential oils or galacturonic acid, which sequently cause negative effects, such as agglomeration of could be useful in recovery of additional value-added prod- the biomass during enzymatic hydrolysis treatment [34]. ucts [21]. Potato peels contain until 52% d.w. starch, which Milling (ball mills, vibratory mills, roller mills, ham- is more easily hydrolysable than cellulose and produces a mer mills, knife mills, colloid mills, and attrition mills) is relatively clean glucose stream for fermentation process the most widely used mechanical method for physical pre- [22]. Apple pomace contains large amounts of specific pol- treatment of lignocellulosic biomass [39], although ultra- yphenols, such as chlorogenic acid, epicatechine, and phlo- sonication [40, 41], microwave irradiation [42, 43, 44], ridzin [23] that can act as fermentation and enzyme inhibi- gamma rays [45, 46], and electron bombardment [36] have tors and therefore as an additional step for the removal. recently been studied.
The choice of mill type also depends upon the desired 3. PRETREATMENT AND particle size and biomass moisture content. Colloidal mills SACCHARIFICATION OF BIOMASS and extruders are only suitable for grinding wet materials with a moisture content of more than 15–20%, while two- roll mills, attrition, hammers, or knives are only suitable The main limitation that prevents optimal use of bio- for grinding dry biomass with a moisture content of up to mass is the availability of fermentable compounds [24]. For 10–15%. Ball and vibratory ball mills are universal types that reason, it is necessary to apply the appropriate pretreat- of blasters, and they can be used for either dry or wet ma- ment to remove the complex network formed by lignin and terials [39]. hemicellulose that inhibits effective enzymatic action on cel- lulose [25, 26]. Likewise, it is required to disrupt the hydro- The particle size obtained with these pretreatments gen bonds between cellulose units as well as increase the po- varies from 0.2–2.0 mm after grinding and 10–30 mm after rosity and surface area for subsequent hydrolysis [27, 28]. chopping. Thus, size reduction leads to an increased over- all hydrolysis yield of 5–25% as well as reduced digestion However, biomass characteristics differ depending on time by 23–59% [24, 47, 48]. Application of these pretreat- the source from which it is obtained and choice of pretreat- ments requires a large amount of energy, and implementa- ment employed, which are different for each situation. The tion at the industrial level is not cost-effective [18, 24], also main aspects that strongly influence enzymatic hydrolysis energy needs raises grow up with moisture content [24]. are the index of cellulose crystallinity [29], degree of Moreover, combination with another physical or chemical polymerization of cellulose[30], area of contact surface be- treatment is required [49, 50]. tween the substrate and enzyme [31], content and distribu- tion of lignin [32], hemicellulose content, porosity of the 3.2 Chemical pretreatment substrate, and thickness of the cell wall [33]. Chemical pretreatments have been extensively investi- Depending on the physicochemical characteristics of gated because of their high efficacy in delignification of lignocellulosic biomass, pretreatment selection should take biomass as well as de-polymerization and decrystallization into consideration the following aspects: i) maximum sugar of cellulose [51]. Moreover, these pretreatments are easily yields, ii) loss and/or low sugar degradation [34], iii) mini- scaled to industrial levels and application is generally cost mum formation of toxic products such as furfural and effective. HMF, which are inhibitory compounds that affect the fer- There are a variety of chemicals that can be used for mentation process [24, 35], iv) it must not require particle this kind of pretreatment, such as oxidizing agents, acids size reduction, v) effectiveness of the process when there and bases, which may also be implemented in combination is a low moisture content [31], vi) compatibility of fermen- with other pretreatments (Table 1). tation processes, vii) minimum heat and/or energy require- ments [31, 34], and viii) maximum recovery of lignin [35]. 3.2.1 Acid hydrolysis Currently, there is no universal pretreatment because The use of acid is the most common chemical pretreat- of the diverse biomass characteristics. Therefore, a variety ment in which the constituent monomers of hemicellulose of methods based on different principles have been devel- (mainly xylose) are hydrolyzed. Moreover, the effect of acid oped. These pretreatments are classified as: physical, chem- for pretreatment of the biomass structure facilitates enzy- ical, physicochemical, and biological; however, approaches matic action of cellulase [74, 75].
3704 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
TABLE 1 - Chemical pretreatments applied to the exploitation of lignocellulosic biomass
Type Pretreat- Waste Pretreatment conditions Enzymatic treatment Yield Reference ment
Acid hydrolysis Sugarcane H2SO4 (1%) and acetic acid 2.32 g Celluclast 1.5 L (65 FPU/ml to GLU 93 g/100 g hemicellu- [52] bagasse (1%), 90 ºC, 10 min 17 IU/ml of β-glucosidase) and 0.52 g lose of Novozyme 188 (376 IU/g of β- glucosidase), 10 g solid, 24 h, pH 4.8 Rice hulls H2SO4 (0.3 %), S/L 5:95, 152 CEL (40 FPU/g), 50ºC, 48 h, pH 4.8 GLU 47.2 g/100 g glucan; [53] ºC, 33 min XYL 86.3 g/100 xylan Wheat straw HCl (1.5% w/w), S/L 1:10 10 FPU/(NS50013) and 10 CBU/g GLU 1.25 g/100 g RM [54] w/w, autoclaved at 121 °C, (NS50010) of cellulose,10% (w/w) XYL 16.49/100 g RM 60 min solid, 50 °C, 72 h, pH 5 Cashew Apple H2SO4 (0.6 mol/L), solid 30% Not applied GLU 256.3 mg/g cellulose [55] bagasse (w/v), 121 ºC, 30 min XYL 987.1 mg/g hemicellu- lose Corn stover H3PO4 (0.5% v/v), 180 °C, 15 Celluclast 1.5 L (15 FPU/g glucan), GLU 35.35 g/100 stover [56] min Novozyme 188, (1578 U/g glucan), XYL 16.83 g/100 g stover Fiberzyme (1578 U/g hemicellulose), solid 10% (w/w), 45 °C, 72 h, pH 5 Rice straw Step 1: H2SO4 (1%), 60 °C, Commercial enzyme blend (6 ppm), GLU 380 g/L [57] 24 h. Step 2: autoclave at 1% solid, 60 °C, 24 h. 121 °C, 15 min, 15 lb pressure Sugarcane H2SO4 (2%), S/L 1:20, 200 Not applied GLU 69.06 g/100g glucan [58] bagasse ºC, 45 min, assisted with ul- XYL 81.35 g/100 xylan trasonic energy
Alkaline hy- Sorghum Ammonium hydroxide (28% CEL (60 FPU/g glucan) GLU 42 g/100 g RM [59] drolysis bagasse v/v), 130 °C, 1 h Novozyme 188 (64 CBU/g glucan), 5 g solid, 55 °C, 24 h, pH 4.8 Rice straw NaOH (12% w/v), 5% solid, Celluclast 1.5 L (80 FPU/ml), GLU 163 g/kg RM [60] 0 °C, 3 h Novozyme 188 (240 IU/ml), 2% solid, 45 °C, 72 h, pH 4.8 Sorghum straw NaOH (2% w/w), 10% (w/v) CEL (2.5 FPU/g), β-glucosidase GLU 5.33 g/100 g RM; [61] solid, 121 °C, 60 min (3.75 CBU/g), xylanase (1.5 FXU/g), XYL 2.34 g/100 g RM 50 °C, 48 h Rapeseed straw NaOH 2M (5% in solution), HCEL (0.3% v/v), β-glucosidase GLU: 12 g/100 g RM; [62] H2O2 (35% m/m), 50⁰C, 1 h, (0.3% v/v), 50 ºC, 24 h, pH 4.8 XYL: 3 g/100 g RM pH 11.5 Kapok fiber NaOH (2%), S/L 1: 12, 120 ºC, Celluclast 1.5 L (68.3 FPU/ml), TS 7.5 g/100 g RM [63] 60 min 50 ºC, 60 min Soybean straw NaOH (12 % w/w), S/L 1:10, Spezyme CP loading 2.5% (w/w) GLU 64.55/100 g solid [64] RT, 24 h, pH 8 and 20 FPU/g solid, 50 °C, 48 h mass
Ionic liquids Rice straw 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Celluclast 1.5L (60 FPU/ ml), GLU 450 g/kg rice straw [65] acetate, 5% solid, 120 ºC, 5 h Novozyme 188 (190 IU/ml), 10 g/l solid, 45 ºC, 72 h, pH 4.8 Corn stover 5% 1-ethyl 3-methyl imidazo- Novozyme 188 (5 FPU/g), 50 ºC, GLU 60 g/100 glucan, [66] lium acetate, 100 ºC, 4 h 24 h, pH 4.8 XYL 55 g/100 g xylan Triticale straw 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ac- CEL (35 U/ml), 10 mg solid, 50 °C, GLU 81/100 g glucan [67] etate (50% w/v), 150 °C, 90 min pH 4.8 Rice straw 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium- 1.5 mg CEL (20 FPU/g biomass), GLU 10.4 mg/ml [68] DMSO, 50 mg/ml solid, 130 ºC 30 mg solid, 50 ºC, pH 4.8 XYL 5.1 mg/ml microwave irradiation, 50 W, 1 min
Organosolv Sitka spruce EtOH:water 60:40 (H2SO4, 1%), Celluclast 1.5 L (44 FPU/ml), 7.2 µl GLU 38.6 g/100 g biomass [69] S/L 1:10, 180 ºC, 60 min Novozyme 188, 200 mg solid, 45 ºC, Ethylglycosides 12.5 g/100 68 h g RM Empty palm EtOH:water 65:35 (2% H2SO4), Celluclast 1.5 L (15 FPU/g), GLU 88.3 g/100 g RM [70] fruit bunch S/L 1:8, 180 ºC, 60 min Novozym 188 (15 IU/g), 2% solid, 48 ºC, 48 h, pH 4.8 Sugarcane EtOH (30%):NaOH (3%) Celluclast 1.5 L (15 FPU/g), GLU 67.3 g/100 g RM [72] bagasse aqueous solution (S/L 7:1 w:w), Novozyme 188 (15 IU/g), 5% solid, XYL 6.1 g/100 g RM 195 ºC, 60 min 50 ºC, 24 h, pH 4.8 Wheat straw EtOH:water (50:50), 30 mM CEL (20 FPU/g), 3% solids, Digestibility of 86% of [73] H2SO4, 210 ºC, 60 min 50 ºC, 72 h, pH 4.8 wheat straw with a lignin yield of 84% RT: room temperatura, GLU: glucose, XYL: xylose, TS: total sugar, EtOH: ethanol, RM: raw material, S/L Solid:liquid ratio, CEL: Cellulase, HCEL: hemicellulase.
3705 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
Acid hydrolysis may be performed in two ways: i) with The addition of an oxidizing agent, such as H2O2, can dilute acid (0.2–2.5%) and high temperatures (140–210 °C), increase lignin removal when using NaOH or Ca(OH)2 and or ii) with concentrated acid (30–70%) and low temperatures significantly inhibit the formation of furfural and HMF [39, (80–100 °C) for periods ranging from seconds to several 62]. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic waste from the produc- minutes [76]. In both cases, sulfuric acid is the most com- tion of furfural with 2% NaOH and 20.4% H2O2 produced monly used [77]. However, because of equipment corro- higher saccharification performance. Percentage of xylose sion and the high concentration of the fermentation inhibi- did not significantly increase; but, glucose yield was 9% tors, which are generated by the use of concentrated acid, higher [90]. pretreatment with dilute acid is preferred [18]. 3.2.3 Ionic liquids Furthermore, other acids that have been studied in- clude HCl, HNO3 [78], H3PO4 [79, 80], and organic acids The use of ionic liquids is a trend that has been gaining [81, 82] (Table 1). Evaluation of acid pretreatment of attention as a pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass [91]. wheat straw showed that high concentrations of maleic acid Ionic liquids are salts that are typically liquid at relatively had a negative effect on glucose yield, because the acid low temperatures and consist of large organic cations and promoted solubility of glucose in the aqueous phase, which small inorganic anions. In addition, these solvents have low is discarded. In this case, about 46 mM acid concentration viscosity, hydrophobicity, and vapor pressure; chemical and is sufficient to achieve yields of 85% glucose. In addition, thermal stability; and are non-flammable. These characteris- it was found that only 1% of these sugars degraded to tics vary depending on the nature of the anion and cation. HMF. Pretreatment with maleic acid showed similar yields Moreover, they are called "green" solvents, since they are to those obtained with sulfuric acid, with the advantage that neither toxic nor explosive [92]. Additionally, because of less sugar degradation occurs [82]. their low vapor pressure, recovery of more than 99% is possible [75]. In general, the main drawback of this pretreatment is the production of fermentation inhibitors, such as acetic The action mechanism of ionic liquids is based on the acid, furfural and HMF, which can be further transformed fact that they can dissolve the carbohydrates and lignin, to formic acid and levulinic acid if conditions are too ex- since the anionic part forms hydrogen bonds with the hy- treme; therefore, the obtained acid hydrolysates must be droxyl groups of cellulose in a 1:1 ratio, thus breaking the detoxified [83-85] which can increases the process cost. crystalline structure of the cellulose and making it more ac- cessible to enzymatic hydrolysis [93]. Nevertheless, some 3.2.2 Alkaline hydrolysis studies revealed that the structures of the lignin and hemi- In alkaline hydrolysis, bases such as NaOH [85, 86], cellulose remain unchanged after treatment with ionic liq- Ca(OH) , KOH, and NH OH [87] are used in order to re- uids [94]. Da Costa et al. [95] developed a methodology for 2 4 the pretreatment of wheat stubble using 1-ethyl-3-me- move lignin, acetyl groups, and uronic acid, which are known to block the enzymatic reaction during cellulose hy- thylimidazolium acetate. The pretreatment performed at drolysis [36]. The saponification that takes place facilitates 120 °C for 6 h with 5% of biomass yielded a cellulose res- idue that was 12% higher than the pretreatment conducted the rupture of cross linkages between hemicellulose with lignin or other compounds [47].This bonding elimination at 120 °C for 2 h with 2% of biomass; however, pretreat- also leads to an increase of porosity and inner surface area; ment at 6 h with 6 % biomass was preferable for the hy- drolysis of hemicellulose and lignin. moreover, it diminishes the cellulose crystallinity index and degree of polymerization. However, the cellulose sol- Typically, pretreatments with ionic liquids are carried ubility is less than is obtained with acid or hydrothermal out under temperatures between 90–130 °C and periods pretreatments. Additionally, in the case of hemicellulose, from 1–24 h [96] (Table 1). Afterward, the biomass is recov- the main solubilized fraction corresponds to xylan [87]. ered by precipitation through the addition of water or other, solvents such as ethanol, methanol, and acetone [97]. Cellu- NaOH is the most commonly used base for alkaline lose dissolves very well in ionic liquids that contain chloride pretreatment [77], although Ca(OH) has recently been 2 ions, formate, acetate, and alkylphosphonates [98]. considered important because it is safe as well as cost ef- fective, as it is cheaper than NaOH [88]. On the other hand, Pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse that had previously the principal factors that affect the efficiency of the process been conditioned by grinding with bis(2-hydroxyethyl-am- are temperature, reaction time, and base concentration (Ta- monium) acetate for 4 h at 100 °C yielded 84% saccharifi- ble 1). Khuong et al. [89] found that higher yields of sac- cation [99]. charification were obtained with a greater concentration of Groff et al. [100] analyzed pretreatment of switchgrass NaOH during the pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse. With for 3 h with 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride in com- 0.2% NaOH, only 3% of the solids were saccharified; in bination with Amberlyst-15, which is a protic acid resin contrast, with a concentration of 5% NaOH, the soluble that catalyzes the hydrolysis of the ether bonds between solids increased up to 51%. Likewise, this pretreatment had glucose molecules, which are adjacent in cellulose. Their a greater effect on lignin and xylan fractions than on those results notably improved saccharification performance, of glucan; therefore, with 5% NaOH, the residual percentage which was 10 times higher than the use of only 1-butyl-3- of each fraction was 11%, 3.8%, and 81.6%, respectively. methylimidazolium. However, this technology is expensive
3706 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
and further development should focus on ionic liquids that then biomass is quickly depressurized [51, 74]. This pro- are available for their application at an industrial level cess combines mechanical forces and chemical effects. The [101]. Additionally, it has also been reported in some stud- mechanical effects are caused by quick depressurization; ies that certain solvents might irreversibly inhibit the activ- alternatively, the chemical effects occur by auto-hydrolysis ity of hydrolytic enzymes [102]. of hemicellulose acetyl groups, which facilitate the release of hemicellulose sugars and the transformation of lignin 3.2.4 Organosolv and cellulose exposure during enzymatic hydrolysis [129].
The organosolv process consists of breaking the inter- Some studies revealed that the use of H2SO4, CO2, or nal bonds of the lignocellulosic material using an organic SO2 improves biomass hydrolysis, which in turn increases solvent or its aqueous mixtures [103]. At a structural level, the yield of the hemicellulose sugars and decreases produc- the organosolv pretreatment allows hydrolysis of the internal tion of inhibitory compounds [51]. Corrales et al. [130] bonds of lignin, between lignin and hemicellulose, and the compared the effect of CO2 and SO2 with regard to the hemicellulose glycosidic bonds with cellulose [104, 105]. structure of sugarcane bagasse that was exposed to a vapor Usually, these pretreatments are conducted at temper- explosion pretreatment. Moreover, it was found by X-ray atures between 180 and 200 °C; however, the addition of diffraction that the index of untreated samples [index crys- an inorganic acid catalyzer, such as HCl, H2SO4, or H3PO4, tallinity (IC)] was 40.0%; on the other hand, samples that allows the pretreatment to work at temperatures less than were pretreated with SO2 and CO2 showed ICs of 65.5% 180 °C [70] (Table 1). Some studies have evaluated other and 56.4% because of the elimination of 68.3% and 40.5% neutral and basic catalysts to increase the yield in the orga- of hemicellulose, respectively. Likewise, SO2 showed nosolv process. In particular, a study conducted on pitch greater efficiency in the pretreatment of biomass because pine (Pinus rigida) compared the effects of H2SO4 (an acid the required energy and process time is less (190 °C for 5 catalyst), NaOH (a basic catalyst), and MgCl2 (a neutral min) compared with CO2 (205 °C for 15 min). catalyst). In optimal time and temperature conditions, it Like other treatments that require high temperatures was found that the maximum yield of saccharification was and acidic conditions, furfural and HMF form in steam ex- obtained with 1% MgCl2 (69.5%) followed by 1% H2SO4 plosion; however, their concentrations can be minimized if (61.5%). Nevertheless, the use of 1% NaOH did not signif- the pretreatment conditions are carefully controlled [131]. icantly improve the yield. However, when the concentra- Moreover, with this pretreatment, there is also risk of con- tion was increased to 2% NaOH, saccharification increased densation and precipitation of the soluble lignin compo- to 58.8% [106]. nents that result in a less digestible biomass and therefore On the other hand, organic acids, such as acetic and reduces their exploitation [18]. formic acids, can also be used. Pretreatment of wheat straw Working in birch wood, Vivekanand et al. [132] found with an solution of water, acetic and formic acid (15:55:30) an increase in Klason lignin when pretreatment severity in- at 105 °C over 3 h produced a composition of 48% cellu- creased with respect to time and temperature. This was lose, 27% hemicellulose, and 21% lignin [71]. probably due to the production of pseudo-lignin from the One of the main disadvantages of organosolv is that degradation products of polysaccharides, primarily furfural the solvent system needs to be completely removed, since or other aromatic compounds that can polymerize again this can inhibit enzymatic action and growth of microor- following a resulting rearrangement reaction, hence, be- ganisms in the fermentation process. For this reason as well coming insoluble and forming pseudo-lignin. as their low cost, methanol and ethanol are the solvents of choice. However, several others have also been used, in- 3.3.2 Ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) cluding acetone, glycol, glycerol, aqueous phenol, and The AFEX process is a pretreatment where biomass is aqueous n-butanol [98]. subjected to high pressures and temperatures between 60– 100 °C in the presence of anhydrous liquid ammonia dur- 3.3 Physicochemical pretreatments ing various periods of time. Subsequently, a sudden pres- The most common physicochemical treatments are sure drop takes place, resulting in the formation of ammo- steam explosion and ammonia fiber explosion AFEX [107]; nia gas that breaks the fibers of the biomass and produces however, there have also been studies on the use of liquid a partial loss of the crystalline conformation of cellulose hot water [108]. Table 2 lists some studies that were con- [133]. During AFEX, the deacetylation of the hemicellu- ducted on lignocellulosic biomass using physicochemical lose and some specific regions of the lignin polymer also methods pretreatments. take place. Only a small amount of solid material is solu- bilized [120]. 3.3.1 Steam explosion Factors that exert greater effects in pretreatment are tem- In the pretreatment with steam explosion (previously perature, water load, and ammonia concentration, but pressure conditioned by mechanical methods), biomass is exposed and time should also be checked and controlled (Table 2). The to relatively high pressures (0.7 and 4.8 MPa) of saturated use of high temperatures promotes saccharification yield; vapor at temperatures of about 160–240 °C (Table 2). The however, excessive heat can result in the degradation of com- process can last from a few seconds to several minutes and pounds as well as furfural and HMF formation [134].
3707 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
TABLE 2 - Physicochemical pretreatments applied to lignocellulosic biomass
Type Waste Pretreatment conditions Enzymatic treatment Product (Yield) Reference Pretreatment
Steam explosion Mandarin peel Hot popping: 150°C, Pectinase (5 mg/kg), xylanase GLU 45.1 g/100 g RM; Fructose [109] pressure: 15 kgf/cm (5mg/kg), β-glucosidase (2 mg 18.4 g/100 g RM /kg), 45 ºC, 24 h, pH 4.8 Oat straw Chopped oat straw Accellerase 1000 (2707 CMC/g), GLU 157 g/kg solid [110] (3-5 mm), 190 ºC, 10 min 80 g solid, 55 ºC, 72 h, pH 4.5 XYL 76 g/kg solid Wheat straw Milled wheat straw Celluclast 1.5 L, Novozym 188 GLU 21.6 g/L [111] (10 mm), 210 ºC, 10 min (20 FPU/g), 50 g/L solid, 50 ºC, pH 5.0 Corn stover Steam chamber, 2.5 MPa, Not applied GLU 3.3 g/L [112] 200 XYL 6.46 g/L Corn stover 100 g solid (2 cm), steam Accellerase 1500 (60 FPU/g GLU 33.4 g/100 g glucan [113] 200 ºC, 5 min glucan), Novozyme 188 (64 XYL 3.17 g/100g xylan pNPGU/g glucan), 6% solid, 50 ºC, 72 h, pH 4.8 Roasted coffee Hot popping: 150°C, pres- CEL (18.3 mg/g), 37 ⁰C, 96 h, FS 40.2 g/L [114] beans sure: 1.47 MPa. pH 5 Rice straw 1.4 MPa, 4 min, Ratio CEL (20 FUP/g), 50 ºC, 36 h, GLU 600 mg/g RM [115] solid:aqueous NH4Cl pH 4.8 (90 g/l) 1:1, RT, overnight Rice straw S/L: 40:60, 2 MPa, 2 min Celluclast 1.5 L (15 FPU/g), GLU 30.08 mg/g RM [116] Novozym 188 (15 IU/g), 0.5 g XYL 55.35 mg/g RM solid, 50 ºC, 48 h, pH 4.5 Corn stalk 200 g rm, S/L 1:1, CEL produced by Trichoderma GLU 150 g/kg RM [117] 1.7 MPa,1 min reesei YG3 (50 FPU/cm), 50 ºC, 48 h, pH 4.8
Ammonia Fiber Sweet sorghum Ratio 2:1 ammonia:bio- CEL: 31.3 mg/g glucan, β-gluco- GLU 25g/100g glucan [118] Explosion bagasse mass loading (w/w), sidase: 17.1 mg/g glucan and xy- XYL 12.7g/100g xylan 140°C, 30 min lanase: 15.6 mg/g, 72 h Corn stover Ratio 1:1 ammonia:bio- Accellerase 1000 (6 mg/g glucan), GLU 0.54 g/L [119] mass loading (w/w), Multifect xylanase (3 mg/g glu- XYL 2.04 g/L 130 ºC,15 min can), 24 h, 50 ºC, pH 4.8 Rice straw Ratio 2:1 ammonia:bio- Spezyme (15 FPU/g glucan), GLU 7.9 g/L [120] mass loading (w/w), Novozyme (64 pNPGU/g glucan), XYL 4.3 g/L 100 ºC, 30 min 6% glucan, 50 ºC, 168 h, pH 4.8 Switchgrass Ratio: 1.5:1 ammonia:bio- Novozyme (735 CBU/g), Spezyme GLU 69.3 g/100 g glucan [121] mass loading (w/w), (15 FPU/g), Multifect Xylanase XYL 67.7 g/100 g xylan 140 ºC, 20 min (27 mg protein/ml), 1% glucan, 50 ºC, 72 h, pH 4.8
Liquid hot water Sugarcane with high pressure CO2: Cellulose (Celluclast 1.5 L), β- Glcose 30.43g/L [122] bagasse S/L: 1:12, 115 ºC, 60 min glucosidase (Novozym 188), solid XYL 9.82g/L 10% (w/v), 50 ºC, 72 h, pH 4.8 Corn stover 100 g solid, 230 ºC, CEL (170 FPU/g), hemicellulose GLU 376 mg/100 g RM; [123] 24 min, 4.3% NaOH (11.3 IU/g), 1 g solid, 50 ºC, 120 h, XYL 160 mg/100 g RM pH 4.8 Sugarcane S/L 1:3, 70 ºC, 60 min Not applied XYL 41.28 mg/100 g RM [124] bagasse
Supercritical Sugarcane 45 g RM, 300 ml water, CEL (20 FPU/ g solid), 2% solid, GLU 29.17 g/100 g RM; [125] CO2 explosion bagasse 160 ºC, 60 min, 7 MPa 50 ºC, 60 h, pH 4.8, XYL 3.76 g/100 g RM
Wheat straw 200 ºC , 12 MPa, 60 min CEL (25 FPU/g wheat bran), GLU 234.6 g/kg RM [126] 50 °C, 72 h, pH 4.8. Corn stover 5 g RM, 165 ºC , 1 g CEL (0.95 g TS 37 g/ 100 g RM [127] 34.5 MPa, 60 min NS50013 & 0.05 g NS50010), 1 g solid, 50 ºC, 48 h, pH 4.8 Sugarcane ba- 20 g RM, 80 ºC, 25 MPa, Cellulolitic complex from Tricho- FS380 g/kg RM [128] gasse 120 min (ultrasonic bath: derma reesei (NS50013), 1 g solid, 154 W) 50 ºC, 8 h, 4.5 Note: GLU: glucose, XYL: xylose, TS: total sugar, RM: raw material, S/L: Solid:liquid ratio, CEL: Cellulase, HCEL: hemicellulose, RT: room tem- perature.
3708 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
According to Yoo et al. [135] bound water molecules could not to be quantified in the first 10 min [142]. More- in the biomass react with ammonium ions and create hy- over, acetic acid, which is generated by ionization of the drogen bonds with cellulose, which effectively results in hemicellulose acetyl groups, can also inhibit the fermenta- the swelling of the cellulose structure and a consequent loss tion process. However, it was found that certain concentra- of its crystallinity. This also results in increased enzyme tions of acetic acid can act as catalysts during saccharifica- accessibility. On the other hand, ammonia concentration tion, since its hydronium ions sufficiently decrease the pH strongly influences the obtained sugar yield. However, the of the medium and allow the hydrolysis of polymers [122]. ammonia load must be approximately 2.0. A study exam- Hongdan et al. [140] showed that pretreatment at 220 °C ined the impact of the different conditions of AFEX pre- for 20 min yielded a concentration of 2.25 g/L of acetic treatment on the ultrastructure of the corn stubble’s cellular acid and showed no negative effect on the production of wall and found that the average structure of the blades, ethanol. Generally, the pH must be between 4 and 7 to fa- which are rich in lignin, was significantly affected with vor the hemicellulose to be in its oligomeric form and avoid loads of 3.0 ammonia. Additionally, the formation of large the formation of inhibitors from monomers [78]. pores and the deposition of hemicellulose were also ob- served [136]. 3.3.4 Supercritical CO2 explosion This pretreatment uses CO in a supercritical state, Previous or simultaneous treatment of biomass with 2 which removes the lignin, increasing hemicellulose and H O as an oxidizing agent significantly improves the sac- 2 2 cellulose digestibility. In aqueous solution, the CO forms charification yield after treatment with AFEX. Samples of 2 carbonic acid, which promotes the hydrolysis of polymers corn stover were previously conditioned with a load of 0.5 [31]. The CO molecules are comparable in size to water H O at 30%, which then underwent pretreatment for sac- 2 2 2 molecules and under the high pressure can penetrate the charification at 130 °C for 10 min with a load of 0.7 water pores of lignin. Subsequently, a rapid drop of pressure oc- and 1.0 ammonia. It was observed that the H O had greater 2 2 curs, which generates the breakdown of the cellulose and effect on the polysaccharide structure in lignin with hydrol- hemicellulose structures and in turn increases their suscep- ysis yields of 88.08% and 90.64% for glucan and xylan, tibility to enzymatic hydrolysis [127]. Supercritical CO respectively [137]. This occurs because H O generates 2 2 2 explosion has been performed at temperatures of 80-200 ºC radical free reagents, including the hydroxyl radical (OH-), - - and pressures of 7-34.5 MPa for 60 minutes (Table 2). perhydroxyl anion (OOH ), and superoxide anion (O2 ), which oxidizes and degrades lignocellulose. At the same Glucose yields obtained in corn stover pretreatment time, the crystalline structure of cellulose breaks, which in- with CO2 were higher as the temperature increased, alt- creases its surface area and therefore improves the enzy- hough such increments were not directly proportional. A matic hydrolysis [138]. low temperature (80 °C) has less impact on the saccharifi- cation yield because there is less diffusivity of supercritical 3.3.3 Liquid hot water CO2 in the biomass structure. The same study showed, by X- ray diffraction, that there was no change in the cellulose frac- In pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with liquid hot water high pressure is used to keep water in a liquid tion crystallinity of the biomass treated with supercritical state at temperatures of 160-240 °C and pressures above 5 CO2 compared with the untreated biomass, while scanning electron microscopy images revealed an increase in surface MPa for 20 min [34], with the aim of hydrolyzing hemicel- lulose and making the cellulose more accessible to enzy- area using a pressure of 3500 psi at 150 °C for 1 h [143]. matic action [139, 140]. Hemicellulose is the main polymer 3.4 Biological pretreatments that is hydrolyzed during this process, for which the major yield is xylose [141]. Lignocellulosic biomass degradation can also be con- ducted using microorganisms. Currently, fungi have been Time, heat, and pressure supplied to the process are studied the most, and the main fungi include brown rot, critical factors, because insufficient saccharification yields white rot, and soft rot fungi [144, 145]. Brown rot is the occur at very low temperatures during short periods of time most effective for cellulose hydrolysis, while white and [142] (Table 2). In contrast, very high temperatures for ex- soft rot are involved in both cellulose and lignin hydrolysis tended periods of time favors the formation of inhibitors, [146-148]. It has been observed that the white fungi with such as furfural and HMF, which are generated from the the highest efficiency of delignification are Phanerochaete degradation of sugars, including xylose and glucose but chrysosporium, Ceriporia lacerata, Cyathus stercoerus, production of these inhibitory compounds can be mini- Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, Pycnoporus cinnabarinus, mized by maintaining the pH between 4 and 7 [139]. and Pleurotus ostreatus [146]. Additionally, in a study of One study showed that the yield of saccharification de- sugarcane bagasse that was exploited as substrate to obtain creased from 86.16 to 62.60% by increasing the tempera- fermentable sugars, it was found that Pleurotus florida in- ture in the pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse from 160 to creased the delignification of the substrate by 7.91% com- 200 °C [140]. On the other hand, during the pretreatment pared with samples that were only treated with H2SO4 of eucalyptus kindling at 180 °C, it was observed that the (0.5%, w/v) and NaOH (0.5%, w/v); similarly, Ganoderma furfural concentration increased from 0.42 to 2.05 g/L by sp. rckk-02 and Coriolopsis caperata RCK 2011 showed extending the process from 10 to 40 min; however, HMF 5.58 and 5.48% increments, respectively [149].
3709 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
Despite the fact that biological pretreatments have the choice of a suitable method or selection of the most con- advantage of being cost effective, require little energy, and venient operation conditions must take into account mainly do not use chemical reagents, they require a large amount the nature and composition of the lignocellulosic material of space, long periods of time, and constant monitoring of [153]. However, when more than one type of pretreatment the growth of the microorganism [150, 151]. can be used for a specific type of biomass, it would be use- ful to consider the advantages and disadvantages offered 3.5 Advantages and disadvantages of the pretreatment tech- by the reported pretreatment methods (Table 3). Correct nologies for saccharification of lignocellulosic material. implementation of the pretreatment technology used for Nowadays, there is an intensive research on the devel- saccharification of food biomass waste is crucial in the pro- opment of technologies to take advantage of agro-food cess of biorefinery, because the efficiency of selected pre- waste for biofuels or biomaterial production, due to envi- treatment will significantly define the profit of the process ronmental problems associated to their disposal and the ne- and therefore the yield of fermentable sugars for biofuels cessity to have alternatives for use of fossil fuels. Cur- and biomaterials production. Intensive research has been rently, it has been developed a variety of technologies to dedicated mainly on the use of waste from commodities, optimize the yield of saccharification products, so that the such as sugar cane, maize, rice, and wheat as feedstock, but
TABLE 3 - Advantages and disadvantage of pretreatments used for saccharification of lignocellulosic material
Pretreatment Advantage Disadvantage method
Physical No waste production or fermentation inhibitor compounds Requires a chemical, physico-chemical or biological pretreat- [26] ment complementary
Acid hydrolysis High rate glucan conversion to glucose (at least 90%) [26] Corrosive, production of fermentation inhibitor compounds Higher performance saccharification that alkaline hydrolysis [26] Easily scalable to industrial level [36] High energy requirement of the process that increases cost [36] Alkaline hydrolysis Requires lower temperatures than other pretreatments [26, 78, Production of toxic effluents [26] 152] Requires longer reaction times (from hours to days) and neutral- Reagents used are inexpensive ization of slurry is required [154] Easily scalable to industrial level [153] Ionic liquids Can dissolve efficiently lignin and carbohydrate simultane- High cost of ionic liquids ously [155] Ionic liquids are incompatible with cellulase leading to the in- Ionic liquids can be easily reused activation requires effective recuperation [156] Non-flamability [11] Organosolv Easy recovery of lignin [157] High cost process Requires a thorough solvent recovery (fermentation inhibitor) [30] Steam explosion Easily scalable to industrial level [11] Incomplete disruption of the lignin–carbohydrate matrix [34] Nor chemical is required Acidic conditions favor formation of fermentation inhibitors Environmentally attractive [34] compounds Requires up to 70% less energy than mechanical methods to Requires proper equipment to work with high pressures obtain a similar particle size [36] Less effective for softwoods [36] Low cost [38]
AFEX Small particle size is not required for efficacy [78] Ineffective in biomass with high lignin content Short times treatment [38] Requires efficient ammonia recovery to be economical due to Unlike steam explosion produced no slurry, but solid material the high cost of ammonia [11, 38] [11] Very low solubilizing hemicellulose [11] Liquid hot water Low or no inhibitors production [11] No chemicals or catalysts are required No washing or neutralization is required [158] Easily scalable to industrial level Not require particle size reduction of the biomass [159] Supercritical CO2 Easy removal of CO2 by depressurization [11] Yields of fermentable sugars are lower compared to steam ex- explosion Requires less energy than AFEX plosion and AFEX [31] More cost-effective than AFEX [31] Requires infrastructure to operate at high pressures [11, 36] No waste products and does not requires further recovery Saccharification yields are higher compared to steam explo- sion method Not cause the formation of inhibitors as in steam explosion [34, 36] Biological Not requires chemicals Long times treatment [26] Decreases both lignin and cellulose [34] Loss of sugars (used as substrate by microorganisms) Low energy requirements Requires infrastructure with controlled conditions [36] Low waste production [36]
3710 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
local crops which produce high quantities of waste have [4] Yepes, S.M., Montoya, N.L.J. and Orozco, S.F. (2008) been poorly studied [160-162]. It is necessary to develop Agroindustrial waste valorization fruits in Medellin and the south of Valle de Aburra, Colombia. Revista Facultad technologies to use non-food crops and biomass waste in Nacional de Agronomía, Medellín. 61(1): 4422-4431. large scale to obtain fermentable sugars for commercial [5] Cherubini, F. (2010) The biorefinery concept: using biomass production of biomaterials or biofuels. Particularly, un- instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy complicated chemical and physicochemical treatments Conversion and Management. 51(7): 1412-1421. with reduced cost and high conversion efficiencies can be [6] International Energy Agency. Technology Roadmap-Bioen- profitable within the biorefinery concept. ergy for Heat and Power (2012) Accessed: Jan. 14, (2014), available in: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublica- tions/publication/2012_Bioenergy_Roadmap_2nd_Edi- tion_WEB.pdf
[7] Galanakis, C.M. (2011) Recovery of high added-value com- 4. CONCLUSIONS ponents from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technolo- gies and commercialized applications. Trends in Food Science Food processing by-products and wastes are a source and Technology. 26: 68-87. of fermentable sugars that can be used by specific micro- [8] Dyk, J.S., Gama, R., Morrison, D., Swart, S. and Pletschke, organisms to produce value-added products. The amount B.I. (2013) Food processing waste: Problems, current manage- ment and prospects for utilization of the lignocellulose com- and kind of sugars produced from this waste depends on ponent through enzyme synergistic degradation. Renewable the residue source and pretreatment process. In contrast Sustainable Energy Reviews. 26: 521–531. with forestry waste, food by-products contain additional [9] Mirabella, N., Castellani, V. and Sala, S. (2014) Current op- components, such as essential oils, alkaloids, or polyphe- tions for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a re- nolic compounds that can interfere with the fermentation view. Journal of Cleaner Production. 65: 28-41. process. In this case, it is necessary to carry out previous [10] FitzPatrick, M., Champagne, P., Cunningham, M.F. and Whit- extraction of the bioactive compounds before the pretreat- ney, R.A. (2010) A biorefinery processing perspective: Treat- ment process that is used to obtain hydrolysates. Thus, food ment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value- added products. Bioresource Technology. 101: 8915-8922. waste can be turned into value-added compounds by a combination of extraction and hydrolysis technologies, ei- [11] Haghighi-Mood, S., Golfeshan, A.H., Tabatabaei, M., Salehi- Jouzani , G., Najafi, G.H., Gholami, M. et al. (2013) Lignocel- ther by using physicochemical or enzymatic treatments. lulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a The presence of enzyme and fermentation inhibitors of the focus on pretreatment. Renewable Sustainable Energy Re- obtained fermentable liquor depends on the pretreatment views. 27: 77-93. used, but selection of resistant microbial strains could pre- [12] Sawatdeenarunat, C., Surendra, K.C., Takara, D., Oechsner, vent the need for additional clean-up steps prior to the fer- H. and Khanal, S.K. (2015). Anaerobic digestion of lignocel- lulosic biomass: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresource mentation processes. Technology. 178: 178-186.
[13] Hu, F. and Ragauskas, A. (2012) Pretreatment and lignocellu- losic chemistry. Bioenergy Research. 5: 1043-1063.
[14] Li, C., Knierim, B., Manisseri, C., Arora, R., Scheller, H.V., ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Auer, M., et al. (2010) Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: Biomass recalcitrance, del- The authors express their gratitude to Consejo Nacional ignification and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresource de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT Project CB-2011-01- Technology. 101: 4900-4906. 169779) and Instituto Politécnico Nacional (Project SIP [15] Limayem, A. and Ricke, S. (2012) Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: Current perspectives, potential issues 20151298) for the financial support. P.Gutiérrez-Macías re- and future prospects. Progress in Energy and Combustion Sci- ceived graduate scholarship from the CONACyT. ence. 38: 449-467. [16] Zhou, C.H., Xia, X., Lin, C.H., Tong, D.S. and Beltramini. The authors have declared no conflict of interest. (2011) Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fine chemicals and fuels. Chemical Society Reviews. 40: 5588- 5617.
[17] Himmel, M.E., Ding, S.Y., Johnson, D.K., Adney, W.S., Nim- los, M.R., Brady, J.W. and Foust, T.D. (2007) Biomass recal- REFERENCES citrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels produc- tion. Science. 315(5813): 804-807. [1] Laufenberg, G., Kunz, B. and Nystroem, M. (2003) Transfor- [18] Hendriks, A.T.W.M. and Zeeman, G. (2009) Pretreatments to mation of vegetable waste into value added products: (A) the enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Biore- upgrading concept; (B) practical implementations. Biore- source Technology. 100: 10-18. source Technology. 87: 167-198. [19] Pandey, M.O. and Kim, C.S. (2011) Lignin depolymerization [2] Tuck, C.O., Pérez, E., Horváth, I.T., Sheldon, R. A. and Polia- and conversion: a review of thermochemical methods. Chem- koff, M. (2012) Valorization of biomass: deriving more value ical Engineering and Technology. 34: 29-41. from waste. Science. 337(6095): 695-699. [20] Sun, Y.S., Lu, X.B., Zhang, S.T., Zhang, R. and Wang, X.Y. [3] Saval, S. (2012) Aprovechamiento de residuos agroindus- (2011) Kinetic study for Fe(NO3)3 catalyzed hemicellulose hy- triales: Pasado, presente y futuro. Revista de la Sociedad Mex- drolysis of different corn stover silages. Bioresource Technol- icana de Biotecnología y Bioingeniería, AC. 14-46. ogy. 102: 2936-2942.
3711 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
[21] Sahraoui, N., Vian, M.A., El Maataoui, M., Boutekedjiret, C. [40] Iskalieva, A., Yimmou, B.M., Gogate, P.R., Horvath, M., and Chemat, F. (2011). Valorization of citrus by-products us- Horvath, P.G. and Csoka, L. (2012) Cavitation assisted delig- ing microwave steam distillation (MSD). Innovative Food Sci- nification of wheat straw: A review. Ultrasonics Sonochemis- ence and Emerging Technologies. 12(2): 163-170. try. 19: 984-993. [22] Arapoglou, D., Varzakas, T., Vlyssides, A. and Israilides, C. [41] Rehman, M.S., Kim, I., Chisti, Y. and Han, J.I. (2013) Use of (2010) Ethanol production from potato peel waste ultrasound in the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic (PPW). Waste Management. 30(10): 1898-1902. biomass. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: [23] Parmar, I. and Rupasinghe, H.P. (2012) Optimization of dilute Energy Science and Research. 30: 1391-1410. acid-based pretreatment and application of laccase on apple [42] Lu, X., Xi, B., Zhang, Y. and Angelidaki, I. (2011) Microwave pomace. Bioresource Technology. 124: 433-439. pretreatment of rape straw for bioethanol production: Focus on [24] Kratky, L. and Jirout, T. (2011) Biomass size reduction ma- energy efficiency. Bioresource Technology. 102: 7937-7940. chines for enhancing biogas production. Chemical Engineer- ing and Technology. 3: 391-399. [43] Pang, F., Xue, S., Yu, S. Zhang, C., Li, B. and Kang, Y. (2012) Effects of microwave power and microwave irradiation time [25] Zhang, Y.H., Berson, E., Sarkanen, S. and Dale, B.E. (2009) on pretreatment efficiency and characteristics of corn stover Pretreatment and biomass recalcitrance: fundamentals and pro- using combination of steam explosion and microwave irradia- gress. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 153: 80-83. tion (SE–MI) pretreatment. Bioresource Technology. 118: [26] Barakat, A., de Vries, H. and Rouau, X. (2013) Dry fractiona- 111-119. tion process as an important step in current and future ligno- cellulose biorefineries: a review. Bioresource Technology. [44] Binod, P., Satyanagalakshmi, K., Sindhu, R., Janu, K.U., 134: 362-373. Sukumaran, R.K. and Pandey, A. (2012) Short duration micro- wave assisted pretreatment enhances the enzymatic sacchari- [27] Balat, M., Balat, H. and Oz, C. (2008) Progressin bioethanol fication and fermentable sugar yield from sugarcane bagasse. processing. Progression Crystal Growth and Characterization Renewable Energy. 37: 109-116. of Materials. 34: 551-73. [45] Yoon, M., Choi, J.I., Lee, J.W. and Park, D.H. (2012) Im- [28] Li, M.F., Fan, Y.M., Xu, F., Sun, R.C. and Zhang, X.L. (2010) provement of saccharification process for bioethanol produc- Cold sodium hydroxide/urea based pretreatment of bamboo tion from Undaria sp. by gamma irradiation. Radiation Phys- for bioethanol production: characterization of the cellulose ics and Chemistry. 81: 999-1002. rich fraction. Industrial Crops and Products. 32: 551-559. [29] Chang, V.S. and Holtzapple, M. (2000) Fundamentals factors [46] Hong, S.H., Lee, J.T., Lee, S., Wi, S.G., Cho, E.J., Singh, S. et affecting biomass reactivity. Applied Biochemistry and Bio- al. (2014) Improved enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw by technology. 5(37): 284-286. combined use of gamma ray and dilute acid for bioethanol pro- duction. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 94: 231-235. [30] Kumar, P., Barrett, D.M., Delwiche, M.J. and Stroeve, P. (2009) Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass [47] Sun, Y. and Cheng, J. (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic ma- for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Industrial and terials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresource Technol- Engineering Chemistry Research. 48: 3713-3729. ogy. 83: 1-11. [31] Alvira, P., Tomás, P.E., Ballesteros, M. and Negro, M.J. [48] Niemi, P., Faulds, C., Sibakov, J., Holopainen, U., Poutanen, (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol K. and Buchert, J. (2012) Effect of a milling pre-treatment on production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. the enzymatic hydrolysis of carbohydrates in brewer’s spent Bioresource Technology. 101: 4851-4861. grain. Bioresource Technology. 116: 155-160. [32] Demirbas, A. (2012) Green Energy and Technology-Biorefin- [49] Bruni, E., Jensen, A.P. and Angelidaki, I. (2010) Comparative eries for Biomass Upgrading Facilities. British Library, study of mechanical, hydrothermal, chemical and enzymatic Springer: London. treatments of digested biofibers to improve biogas production. [33] Chandra, R.P., Bura, R., Mabee, W.E., Berlin, A., Pan, X. and Bioresource Technology. 101: 8713-8717. Saddler, J.N. (2007) Substrate pretreatment: the key to effec- [50] Yu, J., Zhang, J., He, J., Liu, Z. and Yu, Z. (2009) Combina- tive enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics?. Advances in tions of mild physical or chemical pretreatment with biological Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. 108: 67-93. pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of rice hull. Biore- [34] Sarkar, N., Kumar, G.S., Bannerjee, S. and Aikat, K. (2012) source Technology. 100: 903-908. Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview. Renewable Energy. 37: 19-27. [51] Mtui, G.Y.S. (2009) Recent advances in pretreatment of lig- nocellulosic wastes and production of value added products. [35] Yang, B. and Wyman, C.E. (2008) Pretreatment: the key to African Journal of Biotechnology. 8: 1398-1415. unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2: 26-40. [52] de-Moraes-Rocha, G.J., Martin, C., Barbosa, S.I., Souto, M.A.M., Macedo, B.H., Moraes, A.C.A. (2011) Dilute mixed- [36] Behera, S., Arora, R., Nandhagopal, N. and Kumar, S. (2014) acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production. Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of lig- Biomass and Bioenergy. 35: 663-670. nocellulosic biomass. Renewable Sustainable Energy Re- views. 36: 91-106. [53] Dagnino, E.P., Chamorro, E.R., Romano, S.D., Felissia, F.E. [37] Tedesco, M., Barroso, T.M. and Olabi, A.G. (2014) Optimiza- and Area, M.C. (2013) Optimization of the acid pretreatment tion of mechanical pre-treatment of Laminariaceae spp. bio- of rice hulls to obtain fermentable sugars for bioethanol pro- mass-derived biogas. Renewable Energy. 62: 527-534. duction. Industrial Crops and Products. 42: 363-368. [38] Talebnia, F., Karakashev, D. and Angelidaki, I. (2010) Pro- [54] Toquero, C. and Bolado, S. (2014) Effect of four pretreatments duction of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pre- on enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation of wheat treatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresource Technol- straw. Influence of inhibitors and washing. Bioresource Tech- ogy. 101: 4744-4753. nology. 157: 68-76. [39] Taherzadeh, M.J. and Karimi, K. (2008) Pretreatment of ligno- [55] Ponte, R.M.V., Soares, R., Lima, A.T., Gonçalves, R.L. and cellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a de-Macedo, G.R. (2014) Evaluation of dilute acid pretreat- review. International Journal of Molecular Science. 9: 1621- ment on cashew apple bagasse for ethanol and xylitol produc- 1651. tion. Chemical Engineering Journal. 243: 234-243.
3712 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
[56] Avci, A., Saha, B.C., Dien, B., Kennedy, G.J. and Cotta, M.A. [73] Wildschut, J., Smit, A.T., Reith, J.H. and Huijgen, W.J.J. (2013) Response surface optimization of corn stover pretreat- (2013) Ethanol-based organosolv fractionation of wheat straw ment using dilute phosphoric acid for enzymatic hydrolysis and for the production of lignin and enzymatically digestible cel- ethanol production. Bioresource Technology. 130: 603-612. lulose. Bioresource Technology. 135: 58-66. [57] Ranjan, A. and Moholkar, V.S. (2013) Comparative study of [74] Agbor, V.B., Cicek, N., Sparling, R., Berlin, A. and Levin, various pretreatment techniques for rice straw saccharification D.B. (2011) Biomass pretreatment: Fundamentals toward ap- for the production of alcoholic biofuels. Fuel. 112: 567-571. plication. Biotechnology Advances. 29: 675-685. [58] Velmurugan, R. and Muthukumar, K. (2011) Utilization of [75] Brodeur, G., Yau, E., Badal, K., Collier, J., Ramachandran, sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production: Sono-assisted K.B. and Ramakrishnan, S. (2011) Chemical and physico- acid hydrolysis approach. Bioresource Technology. 102: chemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review. 7119-7123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/787532. [59] Chen,C., Boldor, D., Aita, G. and Walker, M. (2012) Ethanol [76] Saha, B.C., Iten, L.B., Cotta, M.A. and Wu, Y.V. (2005) Di- production from sorghum by a microwave-assisted dilute am- lute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermen- monia pretreatment. Bioresource Technology. 110: 190-197. tation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochemistry. 40: 3693-3700. [60] Moradi, F., Amiri, H., Soleimanian-Zad, S., Ehsani, M.R. and [77] Zheng, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, F. and Li, Y. (2014) Pretreatment of Karimi, K. (2013) Improvement of acetone, butanol and etha- lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Pro- nol production from rice straw by acid and alkaline pretreat- ments. Fuel. 112: 8-13. gress in Energy and Combustion Science. 42: 35-53. [78] Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y.Y., Holt- [61] McIntosh, S. and Vancov, T. (2010) Enhanced enzyme sac- azapple, M. and Ladisch, M. (2005) Features of promising charification of Sorghum bicolor straw using dilute alkali pre- technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bio- treatment. Bioresource Technology. 101: 6718-6727. resource Technology. 96: 673-686. [62] Karagöz, P., Rocha, I.V., Özkan, M. and Angelidaki, I. (2012) [79] Gámez, S., González, C.J.J., Ramírez, J.A., Garrote, G. and Alkaline peroxide pretreatment of rapeseed straw for enhanc- Vázquez, M. (2006) Study of the hydrolysis of sugar cane ba- ing bioethanol production by same vessel saccharification and gasse using phosphoric acid. Journal of Food Engineering. 74: co-fermentation. Bioresource Technology. 104: 349-357. 78-88. [63] Tye, Y.Y., Lee, K.T., Abdullah, W.N.W. and Leh, C.P. (2012) [80] Vázquez, M., Oliva, M., Téllez, L.J. and Ramírez, J.A. (2007) Potential of Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. (kapok fiber) as a Hydrolysis of sorghum straw using phosphoric acid: Evalua- resource for second generation bioethanol: Effect of various tion of furfural production. Bioresource Technology. 98: simple pretreatment methods on sugar production. Biore- 3053-3060. source Technology. 116: 536-539. [81] Kootstra, A.M.J., Beeftink, H.H., Scott, E.L. and Sanders, [64] Wan, C., Zhou, Y. and Li, Y. (2011) Liquid hot water and al- J.P.M. (2009a) Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid kaline pretreatment of soybean straw for improving cellulose pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Bio- digestibility. Bioresource Technology. 102: 6254-6259. chemical Engineering Journal. 46: 126-131. [65] Poornejad, N., Karimi, K. and Behzad, T. (2014) Ionic liquid [82] Kootstra, A.M.J., Beeftink, H.H., Scott, E.L. and Sanders, pretreatment of rice straw to enhance saccharification and bi- J.P.M. (2009b) Optimization of the dilute maleic acid pretreat- oethanol production. Journal of Biomass to Biofuel. 1: 8-15. ment of wheat straw. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2(31): 1-14 [66] Barr, C.J., Hanson, B.L., Click, K., Perrotta, G. and Schall, [83] Liu, Z.L. (2011) Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and C.A. (2014) Influence of ionic-liquid incubation temperature in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Applied on changes in cellulose structure, biomass composition, and Microbiology and Biotechnology. 90: 809-825. enzymatic digestibility. Cellulose. 21: 973-982. [84] Alriksson, B., Cavka, A. and Jönsson, L.J. (2010) Improving [67] Fu, D. and Mazza, G. (2011) Aqueous ionic liquid pretreat- the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolysates of lignocellulose ment of straw. Bioresource Technology. 102: 7008-7011. through chemical in-situ detoxification with reducing agents. Bioresource Technology. 102: 1254-1263. [68] Mai, N.L., Ha, S.H. and Koo, Y.M. (2014) Efficient pretreat- ment of lignocellulose in ionic liquids/co-solvent for enzy- [85] Wang, Z., Keshwani, D.R., Redding, A.P. and Cheng, J.J. matic hydrolysis enhancement into fermentable sugars. Pro- (2010) Sodium hydroxide pretreatment and enzymatic hydrol- cess Biochemistry. 49: 1144-1151. ysis of coastal Bermuda grass. Bioresource Technology. 101: 3583-3585. [69] Bouxin, F.P., Jackson, S.D. and Jarvis, M.C. (2014) Organo- solv pretreatment of Sitka spruce wood: Conversion of hemi- [86] Silverstein, R.A., Chen, Y. and Sharma, S.R.R. (2007) A com- celluloses to ethyl glycosides. Bioresource Technology. 151: parison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving sac- 441-444. charification of cotton stalks. Bioresource Technology. 98: 3000-3011. [70] Goh, CS, Tan, HT, Lee, KT and Brosse, N. (2011) Evaluation [87] Chaudhary, G., Singh, L.K. and Ghosh, S. (2012) Alkaline and optimization of organosolv pretreatment using combined pretreatment methods followed by acid hydrolysis of Sac- severity factors and response surface methodology. Biomass charum spontaneum for bioethanol production. Bioresource Bioenergy.; 35: 4025-4033. Technology. 124: 111-118. [71] Snelders, J., Dornez, E., Benjelloun, M.B., Huijgen, W.J.J., [88] Reilly, M., Dinsdale, R. and Guwy, A. (2015). Enhanced bio- de-Wild, P.J., Gosselink, R.J.A., Gerritsma, J., Courtin, C.M. methane potential from wheat straw by low temperature alka- (2014) Biorefining of wheat straw using an acetic and formic line calcium hydroxide pre-treatment. Bioresource Technol- acid based organosolv fractionation process. Bioresource ogy. 189: 258-265. Technology. 156: 275–282. [89] Khuong, L.D., Kondo, R., de-Leon, R., Anh, T.K., Shimizu, [72] Mesa, L., González, E., Cara, C., González, M., Castro, E. and K. and Kamei, I. (2014) Bioethanol production from alkaline- Mussatto, S.I. (2011) The effect of organosolv pretreatment pretreated sugarcane bagasse by consolidated bioprocessing variables on enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. using Phlebia sp. MG-60. International Biodeterioration and Chemical Engineering Journal. 168: 1157-1162. Biodegradation. 88: 62-68.
3713 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
[90] Wang, K., Yang, H., Chen, Q. and Sun, R. (2013) Influence of [107] Bals, B., Wedding, C., Balan, V., Sendich, E. and Dale, B. delignification efficiency with alkaline peroxide on the digest- (2011) Evaluating the impact of ammonia fiber expansion ibility of furfural residues for bioethanol production. Biore- (AFEX) pretreatment conditions on the cost of ethanol produc- source Technology. 146: 208-214. tion. Bioresource Technology. 102: 1277-1283. [91] Mora P.M., Meli, L., Doherty, T.V., Linhardt, R.J. and [108] Pu Y., Jiang N., Ragauskas A.J. (2007) ionic liquid as a green Dordick, J.S. (2011) Room temperature ionic liquids as emerg- solvent for lignin. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technol- ing solvents for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. ogy. 27(1):23–33 . Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 108: 1229-1245. [109] Choi, I.S., Kim, J.H., Wi, S.G., Kim, K.H. and Bae, H.J. [92] Zheng, Y., Pan, Z. and Zhang, R. (2009) Overview of biomass (2013) Bioethanol production from mandarin (Citrus unshiu) pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. International peel waste using popping pretreatment. Applied Energy. 102: Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2: 51-68. 204-210. [93] Brandt, A., Ray, M.J., To, T.Q., Leak, D.J., Murphy, R.J. and [110] Dererie, D.Y., Trobro, S., Momeni, M.H., Hansson, H., Welton, T. (2011) Ionic liquid pretreatment of lignocellulosic Blomqvist, J., Passoth, V. et al. (2014) Improved bio-energy biomass with ionic liquid-water mixtures. Green Chemistry. yields via sequential ethanol fermentation and biogas digestion 13: 2489-2499. of steam exploded oat straw. Bioresource Technology. 102: 4449-4455. [94] Samayamand, I.P. and Schall, C.A. (2010) Saccharification of ionic liquid pretreated biomass with commercial enzyme mix- [111] Horn, S.J., Nguyen, Q.D., Westereng, B., Nilsen, P. and tures. Bioresource Technology. 101: 3561-3566. Eijsink, V.G.H. (2011) Screening of steam explosion condi- tions for glucose production from non-impregnated wheat [95] Da-Costa, L.A., João, G.K., Rubik, D.F., Bogel-Łukasik, E., straw. Biomass and Energy. 35: 4879-4886. Duarte, L.C., Andreaus, J. and Bogel-Łukasik, R. (2013) Pre- treatment of lignocellulosic biomass using ionic liquids: [112] Chang, J., Cheng, W., Yin, Q., Zuo, R., Song, A., Zheng, Q. et Wheat straw fractionation. Bioresource Technology. 142: 198- al. (2012) Effect of steam explosion and microbial fermenta- 208. tion on cellulose and lignin degradation of corn stover. Biore- source Technology. 104: 587-592. [96] Heinze, T., Schwikal, K. and Barthel, S. (2005) Ionic liquids [113] Liu, Z.H., Qin, L., Pang, F., Jin, M.J., Li, B.Z., Kang, Y. et al. as reaction medium in cellulose functionalization. Macromo- (2013) Effects of biomass particle size on steam explosion pre- lecular Bioscience. 5: 520-525. treatment performance for improving the enzyme digestibility [97] Prado R., Erdocia X., Labidi J. (2013b) Lignin extraction and of corn stover. Industrial Crops and Products. 44: 176-184. purification with ionic liquids. Journal of Chemical Technol- [114] Choi, I.S., Kim, J.H., Wi, S.G., Kim, K.H. and Bae, H.J. ogy and Biotechnology. 88(7):1248–1257. (2012) Conversion of coffee residue waste into bioethanol [98] Zhao, H., Jones, C.L., Baker, G.A., Xia, S., Olubajo, O. and with using popping pretreatment. Bioresource Technology. Person, V.N. (2009) Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids 125: 132-137. for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. Journal of Biotech- [115] Chen, H., Li, G. and Li, H. (2014) Novel pretreatment of steam nology. 139: 47-54. explosion associated with ammonium chloride preimpregna- [99] De-Azevedo, R.E.G., da-Costa, C.A. and Aznar, M. (2014) tion. Bioresource Technology. 153: 154-159. Use of protic ionic liquids as biomass pretreatment for ligno- [116] Wang, K., Xiong, X., Chen, P., Chen, L., Su, X. and Liu, Y. cellulosic ethanol production. Chemical Engineering Transac- (2012) Comparison of gamma irradiation and steam explosion tions. 37: 397-402. pretreatment for ethanol production from agricultural residues. [100] Groff, D., George, A., Sun, N., Sathitsuksanoh, N., Bokinsky, Biomass Bioenergy. 46: 301-308. G., Simmons, B.A., et al. (2013) Acid enhanced ionic liquid [117] Li, G. and Chen, H. (2014) Synergistic mechanism of steam pretreatment of biomass. Green Chemistry. 15: 1264-1267. explosion combined with fungal treatment by Phellinus baumii for the pretreatment of corn stalk. Biomass Bioenergy. [101 Hayes, D.J. (2009) An examination of biorefining processes, 67: 1-7. catalysts and challenges. Catalysis Today. 145: 138-151. [118] Li, B.Z., Balan, V., Yuan, Y.J. and Dale, B.E. (2010a) Process [102] Turner, M.B., Spear, S.K., Huddleston, J.G., Holbrey, J.D. and optimization to convert forage and sweet sorghum bagasse to Rogers, R.D. (2003) Ionic liquid salt-induced inactivation and ethanol based on ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreat- unfolding of cellulase from Trichoderma reesei, Green Chem- ment. Bioresource Technology. 101: 1285-1292. istry. 5(4): 443–447. [119] Humpula, J.F., Uppugundla, N., Vismeh, R., Sousa, L., [103] Geng, A., Xin, F. and Ip, J.Y. (2012) Ethanol production from Chundawat, S.P.S., Jones, D., et al. (2014) Probing the nature horticultural waste treated by a modified organosolv method. of AFEX-pretreated corn stover derived decomposition prod- Bioresource Technology. 104: 715-721. ucts that inhibit cellulase activity. Bioresource Technology. [104] Obama, P., Ricochon, G., Muniglia, L. and Brosse. (2012) 152: 38-45. Combination of enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol organosolv [120] Harun, S., Balan, V., Takriff, M.S., Hassan, O., Jahim, J. and pretreatments: Effect on lignin structures, delignification Dale, B.E. (2013) Performance of AFEX™ pretreated rice yields and cellulose-to-glucose conversion. Bioresource Tech- straw as source of fermentable sugars: the influence of particle nology. 112: 156-163. size. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 6: 1-17. [105] Lai, C., Tu, M., Li, M. and Yu, S. (2014) Remarkable solvent [121] Garlock, R.J., Balan, V. and Dale, B.E. (2012) Optimization and extractable lignin effects on enzymatic digestibility of or- of AFEX™ pretreatment conditions and enzyme mixtures to ganosolv pretreated hardwood. Bioresource Technology. 156: maximize sugar release from upland and lowland switchgrass. 92-99. Bioresource Technology. 104: 757-768. [106] Park, N., Kim, H.Y., Koo, B.W., Yeo, H. and Choi, I.G. (2010) [122] Alves, G.L.V., Borges, P.M.T. and da-Silva, A.A. (2014) En- Organosolv pretreatment with various catalysts for enhancing hancing liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment of sugarcane ba- enzymatic hydrolysis of pitch pine (Pinus rigida). Bioresource gasse by high pressure carbon dioxide (HP-CO2). Industrial Technology. 101: 7046-7053. Crops and Products. 57: 141–149.
3714 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
[123] Li, H.Q., Jiang, W., Jia, J.X. and Xu, J. (2014) pH pre-cor- [139] Yu, Q., Zhuang, X., Lv, S., He, M., Zhang, Y., Yuan, Z., Qi, rected liquid hot water pretreatment on corn stover with high W., Wang, Q., Wang, W. and Tan, X. (2013a) Liquid hot water hemicellulose recovery and low inhibitors formation. Biore- pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and its comparison with source Technology. 153: 292-299. chemical pretreatment methods for the sugar recovery and structural changes. Bioresource Technology. 129: 592-598. [124] Vallejos, M.E., Zambon, M.D., Area, M.C. and da-Silva, C.A.A. (2012) Low liquid–solid ratio (LSR) hot water pre- [140] Hongdan, Z., Shaohua, X. and Shubin, W. (2013) Enhance- treatment of sugarcane bagasse. Green Chemistry. 14: 1982- ment of enzymatic saccharification of sugarcane bagasse by 1989. liquid hot water pretreatment. Bioresource Technology. 143: 391-396. [125] Zhang, H. and Wu, S. (2013) Subcritical CO2 pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and its enzymatic hydrolysis for sugar pro- [141] Yu, Q., Zhuang, X., Yuan, Z., Qi, W., Wang, W., Wanga, Q. duction. Bioresource Technology. 149: 546–550. and Tan, X. (2013b) Pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with [126] Alinia, R., Zabihi, R., Esmaeilzadeh, F. and Kalajahi, J.F. liquid hot water and aqueous ammonia. Bioresource Technol- ogy. 144, 210-215. (2010) Pretreatment of wheat straw by supercritical CO2 and its enzymatic hydrolysis for sugar production. Biosystems En- [142] Weiqi, W., Shubin, W. and Liguo, L. (2013) Combination of gineering. 107: 61-66. liquid hot water pretreatment and wet disk milling to improve [127] Huisheng, L., Miaomiao, R., Minhua, Z. and Ying, C. (2013) the efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis of eucalyptus. Bio- Pretreatment of corn stover using supercritical CO2 with wa- resource Technology. 128, 725–730. ter-ethanol as co-solvent. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engi- [143] Narayanaswamy, N., Faik, A., Goetz, D.J. and Gu, T. (2011) neering. 21: 551-557. Supercritical carbon dioxide pretreatment of corn stover and [128] Benazzi, T., Calgaroto, S., Astolfi, V., Rosa, D.C., Oliveira, switchgrass for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Biore- J.V. and Mazutti, M.A. (2013) Pretreatment of sugarcane ba- source Technology. 102: 6995-7000. gasse using supercritical carbon dioxide combined with ultra- [144] Eisenhuber, K., Krennhuber, K., Steinmüller, V. and Jäger, A. sound to improve the enzymatic hydrolysis. Enzyme and Mi- (2013) Comparison of different pre-treatment methods for sep- crobial Technology. 52: 247-250. arating hemicellulose from straw during lignocellulose bioeth- [129] Pan, X., Gilkes, N. and Saddler, J.N. (2006) Effect of acetyl anol production. Energy Procedia. 40: 172-181. groups on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. [145] Singh, S., Harms, H., and Schlosser, D. (2014) Screening of Holzforschung. 60: 398-401. ecologically diverse fungi for their potential to pretreat ligno- [130] Corrales, R.C.N.R., Mendes, F.M.T., Perrone, C.C., cellulosic bioenergy feedstock. Applied Microbiology and Bi- Sant’Anna, C., de-Souza, W., Abud, Y., Bon, da S.E.P. and otechnology. 98: 3355-3370. Ferreira-Leitão, V. (2012). Structural evaluation of sugar cane [146] Kumar, R. and Wyman, C.E. (2009) Effect of cellulase and bagasse steam pretreated in the presence of CO2 and SO2. Bi- otechnology for Biofuels. 5: 1-8. xylanase enzymes on the deconstruction of solids from pre- treatment of poplar by leading technologies. Biotechnology [131] García A.M.P., Ballesteros, I. and González, A. (2006) Effect Progress. 25: 302-314. of inhibitors released during steam-explosion pretreatment of barley straw on enzymatic hydrolysis. Applied Microbiology [147] Mathews, S.L., Pawlak, J. and Grunden, A.M. (2015) Bacterial and Biotechnology. 129: 278-288. biodegradation and bioconversion of industrial lignocellulosic streams. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 99(7), [132] Vivekanand, V., Olsen, E.F., Eijsink, V.G.H. and Horn, S.J. 2939-2954. (2013) Effect of different steam explosion conditions on me- thane potential and enzymatic saccharification of birch. Biore- [148] Wang, W., Yuan, T. and Cui, B. (2014) Biological pretreat- source Technology. 127: 343-349. ment with rot fungi and their co-culture to overcome lignocel- lulosic recalcitrance for improved enzymatic digestion. Bio- [133] Hoover, A., Tumuluru, J.S., Teymouri , F., Moore, J. and Resources. 9: 3968-3976. Gresham, G. (2014) Effect of pelleting process variables on physical properties and sugar yields of ammonia fiber expan- [149] Deswal, D., Gupta, R., Nandal, P. and Kuhad, R.C. (2014) sion pretreated corn stover. Bioresource Technology. 164: Fungal pretreatment improves amenability of lignocellulosic 128-135. material for its saccharification to sugars. Carbohydrate Poly- mers. 99: 264-269. [134] Langan, P., Petridis, L., O’Neill, H., Pingali, V., Foston, M., Nishiyama, Y., et al. (2014) Common processes drive the ther- [150] Wyman, C.E., Dale, B.E., Elander, R.T., Holtzapple, M., La- mochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Green disch, R. and Lee, Y.Y. (2005) Coordinated development of Chemistry. 16: 63-68. leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Tech- nology. 96: 1959-1966. [135] Yoo, C.G., Nghiem, N.P., Hicks, K.B. and Kim, T.H. (2011) Pretreatment of corn stover using low-moisture anhydrous am- [151] Shi, J., Sharma S.R.R., Chinn, M. and Howell, N. (2009) Ef- monia (LMAA) process. Bioresource Technology. 102: fect of microbial pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis and 10028–10034. fermentation of cotton stalks for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy. 33: 88-96. [136] Chundawat, S.P.S., Bellesia, G., Uppugundla, N., da-Costa, S.L., Gao, D., Cheh, A.M., et al. (2011) Restructuring the crys- [152] Digman, M.F., Shinners, K.J., Dien, B.S., Hatfield, R.D., Li, talline cellulose hydrogen bond network enhances its depoly- X.L., Muck, R.E., Weimer, P.J. (2007). On-farm pretreatment merization rate. Journal of the American Chemical Soci- technologies for improving enzymatic degradability of cellu- ety.133: 11163-11174. lose and hemicellulose present in perennial grass. In ASABE [137] Zhao, C., Ding, W., Chen, F., Cheng, C., Shao, Q. (2014) Ef- Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis, MN. fects of compositional changes of AFEX-treated and H- [153] García, A., Alriols, M. G., and Labidi, J. (2014). Evaluation of AFEX-treated corn stover on enzymatic digestibility. Biore- different lignocellulosic raw materials as potential alternative source Technology. 155: 34-40. feedstocks in biorefinery processes. Industrial Crops and [138] Shen, G., Tao, G., Zhao, M., Yang, B., Wen, D.,Yuan, Q. and Products. 53: 102-110. Rao, G. (2011) Effect of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment on [154] Wan, C., Zhou, Y., Li, Y. (2011). Liquid hot water and alkaline the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Journal of Food Process pretreatment of soybean straw for improving cellulose digest- Engineering. 3: 905-921. ibility. BioresourceTechnology.102: 6254-6259.
3715 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
[155] Tan, H.T., Lee, K.T., Mohamed, A.R. (2010). Pretreatment of lignocellulosic palm biomass using a solvent-ionic liquid [BMIM] Cl for glucose recovery: An optimization studyusing response surface methodology. Carbohydrate Polymer. 83:1862-1868. [156] Yang, F., Li, L., Li, Q., Tan, W., Liu, W., and Xian, M. (2010). Enhancement of enzymatic in situ saccharification of cellulose in aqueous-ionic liquid media by ultrasonic intensifica- tion. Carbohydrate Polymers. 81(2): 311-316. [157] Mesa, L., Gonzalez, E., Cara, C., González M., Castro, E., Mussatto, S.I. (2011). The effect of organosolv pretreatment variables on enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Chemical Engineering Journal. 168:1157–1162.
[158] Girio, M., Fonseca, C., Carvalheiro, F., Duarte, L.C., Marques, S., Bogel-Lukasik, R. (2010). Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresource Technology. 101: 4775-4800.
[159] Kratky, L., Jirout, T., Nalezenec, J. (2012). Lab-scale technol- ogy for biogas production from lignocellulosic wastes. Acta Polytech. 52: 54–59.
[160] Barragán-Huerta, B.E., Cabrera-Soto,M. L., Cruz, M.T., Ped- roza-Rodríguez, A.M. (2015). The valorization of tequila in- dustry agricultural waste throught its use as substrate for lac- case production in a fluidized bed reactor. Fresenius Environ- mental Bulletin. 24: 2026-2034. [161] Nuñez, H.M., Rodríguez, L., Khana, M., N. (2011). Agave for tequila and biofuels: an economic assessment and potential op- portunities. GCB-Bioenergy. 3: 43–57. [162] Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., van Otterdijk, R., Meybeck A. (2011). Global food losses and food waste – Ex- tent, causes and prevention. FAO. Rome.
Received: May 04, 2015 Revised: August 31, 2015 Accepted: September 10, 2015
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Dr. Blanca E. Barragán-Huerta
Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas
Departamento de Ingeniería en Sistemas Ambientales
Av. Wilfrido Massieu S/N, Unidad Profesional
Adolfo López Mateos
CP 07739 México
D.F. MEXICO
Phone +52 (55)-57296000 Ext 52310
E-mail: [email protected]
FEB/ Vol 24/ No 11a/ 2015 – pages 3703 - 3716
3716 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
A STATISTICAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN TO DETERMINE THE AZO DYE DECOLORIZATION AND DEGRADATION BY THE HETEROGENEOUS FENTON PROCESS
Yeliz Aşçı1,*, Ezgi A. Demirtas2, Cansu Filik Iscen3 and A. Sermet Anagun2
1Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 26480, Meselik, Eskisehir, Turkey 2Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Department of Industrial Engineering, 26480, Meselik, Eskisehir, Turkey 3Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Department of Elementary Education, 26480, Meselik, Eskisehir, Turkey
ABSTRACT The traditional methods are being used to decolorize dye in textile wastewaters, such as chemical or electrochemical Full factorial design of experiment was used to screen precipitation, coagulation/flocculation, membrane separa- the factors affecting the color and COD removal efficiency tion (ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis), biological treatment for an azo dye, Direct Orange 26 (DO26). The obtained lin- processes and adsorption [4-5]. However, most of the dyes ear model was statistically tested using analysis of variance are found to be resistant to conventional treatment process (ANOVA), Student’s t-test, lack of fit test, and test of curva- [5] and due to the variability of the organic dyes it is diffi- ture. The percentage removal of color and COD was exam- cult to treat this kind of wastewater using traditional bio- ined by varying experimental conditions with center points. chemical treatment process and coagulation treatment pro- The factors and levels used during the experiments were; cess is inadequate [6]. Most azo dyes are not biodegradable initial pH (2, 4 and 6), catalyst amount (0.2 g/250 ml, 0.6 g/ by aerobic treatment processes, but they can be decolorized 250 ml and 1g/250 ml), stirring speed (150 rpm, 200 rpm and by anaerobic treatment. However, this treatment results in 250 rpm) and reaction time (10 min., 35 min. and 60 min.). A the cleavage of the nitrogen double bond, and the resulting desirability function based simultaneous optimization proce- fragments, which are aromatic amines, are proven carcino- dure was implemented to seek better conditions in terms of gens [7].The disposal problem of precipitated wastes is the maximizing the color and COD removal from wastewaters. main disadvantage of precipitation methods. For dye ad- The results showed that 98.5% color and 77.5% COD re- sorption, activated carbon, biomass derivatives, and other moval was obtained when initial pH, catalyst amount, stir- adsorbents were found to remove dye efficiently. Activated ring speed, and reaction time are roughly set to 2, 1 g/250 ml, carbon adsorption process for the removal of dyes is an ac- 250 rpm, and 60 min., respectively. cepted practice, but the cost of treatment is high [8]. Also, the regeneration of the adsorbents is not easy. Some low- cost adsorbents may be directly disposed of, but in many countries disposal of the wastewater treatment sludge and KEYWORDS: Experimental Design, Heterogeneous Fenton, spent adsorbents are prohibited by laws [9]. Therefore, re- Fe(III)-sepiolite catalyst, Direct Orange 26, Oxidation cently, advanced oxidation processes (AOP) using ozone,
titanium dioxide (TiO2), ultra violet (UV), and Fenton’s re-
agent (H2O2 and ferrous ion) have received considerable attention as effective pretreatment processes of less biode- 1. INTRODUCTION gradable wastewater [10]. Among them, Fenton’s reagent has been widely used because had proved to be highly effec- Wastewaters from textile and dye industries constitute tive in the degradation and mineralization of most of the pol- a substantial amount of pollutants such as high Chemical lutants in wastewaters. Fenton’s process has not only trans- Oxygen Demand (COD), broad fluctuating pH, high amount formed chemically polluting agents, but present very attrac- of suspended particles and are strongly colored and direct tive advantages, such as the complete mineralization of some discharge of textile industry wastewater into the receiving compounds, their oxidation at very low concentrations, the media causes serious environmental pollution by imparting generation of environmentally friendly by products and the intensive color and toxicity to aquatic environment [1, 2]. low consumption of energy, in comparison with other Azo dyes are the most common pollutants of textile waste- wastewater treatment methods [11]. The Fenton process also waters and can cause several problems to the aquatic life [3]. could be adopted rapidly in a textile wastewater treatment system, without the need for reconstructing the existing co- * Corresponding author agulation unit. The only change in operating the process
3717 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
2 will be the addition of H2O2 and Fe+ as well as pH adjust- In this work, Fenton treatment in heterogeneous 2+ ment. The use of Fe /H2O2 as an oxidant for wastewater phase is used to remove organic dye present in synthetic treatment is attractive since iron is highly abundant and solutions. In order to investigate the influence of different non-toxic, and a 30% hydrogen peroxide aqueous solution variables 24 full factorial experimental design with center is easy to handle and environmentally not harmful [6]. Nu- points was used and then the different models were de- merous studies on the treatment of textile dye effluents in- scribed for the organic dye decolorization and degradation clude Fenton processes [12-19]. The Fenton system also process. To the best of our knowledge, simultaneous opti- has been applied in real industrial wastewaters such as mization of color and COD removal of DO26 using Fe(III)- treatment of olive oil mill wastewater in southwestern sepiolite clay as a catalyst has not been reported previously. Spain [20], removal of organic contaminants in paper pulp treatment effluents in Spain [21] chemical industry for pes- ticides removal in southern Poland, El-Nasr pharmaceuti- 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS cal industry for antibiotic removal in South-East of Cairo, tannery industrial treatment plant in Brazil [22]. 2.1. Materials Although Fenton process has received much attention Direct Orange 26 commonly used in textile industries in the past few years, the use of Fe(II)/Fe(III) as a homo- was obtained from Burboya Co. Textile Industry, Bursa, geneous catalyst has a significant disadvantage. The homo- Turkey, at 45 % purity and was used without further puri- geneous Fenton requires complementary steps, such as pre- fication. The structure and characteristics of DO26 are pre- cipitation and flocculation to recover the iron catalyst, pre- sented in Table 1. Hydrogen peroxide (30%, w/w) and vent contamination and enable catalyst reuse [11-23]. As a Fe(NO3)3·9H2O were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Ger- consequence, heterogeneous Fenton processes are of par- many. All chemicals were analytical-grade reagents and ticular interest since most of the iron remains in the solid were used as received without further purification. Deion- phase. In addition to showing limited leaching of iron ions, ized water was used and the heterogeneous catalyst was the the catalysts can easily be recovered after the reaction and natural clay without pre-treatment, which was supplied from remain active during successive operations [24]. sepiolite mines in the Eskisehir region of Turkey.
The development of supported Fenton catalysts has re- TABLE 1 - The characteristics of DO26 cently become important in the emerging field of advanced oxidation technologies [25]. A number of heterogeneous cat- alysts developed by immobilizing Fe(II)/Fe(III) ions on var- ious supports had been reported in the literature [26-27]. The use of clays as catalysts for Fenton-like reactions is a prom- ising alternative because they are abundant in nature and, they have high specific surface area, high chemical and me- chanical stabilities, and a variety of surface and structural properties [22]. Among these clays, sepiolite is gaining con- siderable attention because of its sorptive, rheological and catalytic properties, as well as its needle-like morphology. Moreover, the relatively low cost of sepiolite guarantees its Molecular Formula: C33H22N6Na2O9S2 continued utilization in the future [24]. The heterogeneous Formula Weight: 756.67 Fenton techniques depend on various parameters such as the Colour:Orange catalyst amount, H2O2 concentration, pH, reaction time, stir- λmax (nm): 494.5 ring speed and temperature. The number of the influential variables in the selected system is high, and for this reason it 2.2. Preparation of the catalyst is useful to apply experimental design techniques. The ex- After washing and drying, the selected 0.038–0.053 perimental design is a helpful tool to identify significant var- mm-sized sepiolite was prepared through a cation ex- iables that affect the process and to determine optimal con- change process as follows: 10 g sepiolite and 100mL of 1 ditions in several processes with minimal experimental runs g/L Fe(NO3)3·9H2O solution were mixed and shaken at 175 [28]. Additionally, the relative significance of the factors and rpm for 6 h at 55°C. The samples were washed with deion- possible synergistic or antagonistic interactions that may ex- ized water and dried at 105°C. The characterization of this ist between them can be evaluated [29]. A two-level factorial catalyst was performed previously [24]. design (2k) was selected in the present work due to the fact that this design technique is very useful in experiments stud- 2.3. Experimental Procedure ying the effect of several variables and how these variables Chemical oxidation of DO26 was carried out in batch interact with each other over a response factor. Full factorial mode, using a beaker filled with 250mL of the DO26 solu- design is considered to be the most suitable design when the tion at a given concentration. In a typical run, the pH of the study is directed towards gaining knowledge of the influence DO26 solution has been adjusted to the desired pH value of the variables on the process [30]. by NaOH or H2SO4. After stabilization of the temperature
3718 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
and pH, the powder catalyst (Fe(III)-sepiolite) was added to where C0 is the initial dye concentration in ppm and Ct the DO26 solution. The beginning of the reaction was con- is dye concentration at any time t. COD removal was meas- sidered when the required amount of H2O2 (0.5 mM) was ured at different time intervals by COD kits. The calcula- added. All experiments were carried out under constant stir- tion of the extent of COD removal is shown in Eq.2. ring to ensure good dispersion of the catalyst. Thereafter, COD COD samples were withdrawn periodically and centrifuged to re- %()100COD removal 0 t (2) move suspended particles for 5 min and analyzed using a COD0 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, model UV-120-01). where COD0 is the initial COD in ppm and CODt is COD in ppm at any time t. 2.4. Analysis
The maximum absorbance wavelength (λmax) of DO26 was found to be 494.5nm using a UV–vis spectro- 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION photometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, model Helios Aquamate). 3.1 Experimental Design and Modeling The color removal was determined using Eq.1. Initially, preliminary experiments were conducted to CC decide the most influential operating parameters and their %Color removal (0 t ) 100 (1) levels. The effect of pH was investigated in the range of 2- C0 6. The results indicated that color and COD removal was significantly influenced by the pH of the solution.
%Color Removal %COD Removal %Color Removal %COD Removal 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 0 102030405060 0 102030405060 Reaction Time (min.) Reaction Time (min.)
(a) A=2, B= 0.2g/250mL, C= 150 rpm (b) A=2, B= 1g/250mL, C= 150 rpm
%Color Removal %COD Removal %Color Removal %COD Removal 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 0 102030405060 0 102030405060 Reaction Time (min.) Reaction Time (min.)
(c) A=2, B= 0.2 g/250mL, C= 250 rpm (d) A=2, B= 1g/250mL, C= 250 rpm FIGURE 1 - Preliminary Experiment Results for Color and COD Removal
3719 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
Some results of preliminary experiments are shown in culated through regression analysis and tested for signifi- Figure 1 at the optimum level of pH (pH=2). According to cance by Student’s t-test at 95% confidence level. The es- the preliminary experiments maximum color or COD re- timated effects and coefficients are given in Table 4 and moval was reached at pH=2, 1 g/250 ml catalyst concentra- Table 5 for color and COD removal, respectively. Table 4 tion, 250 rpm stirring speed, and 60 min. reaction time under shows that the coefficients of all the main effects and AB, the following conditions: a temperature of 250C, 100 ppm ABD, BCD interactions effects are statistically significant initial dye concentration and 0.5 mM H2O2 concentration. (p<0.05) and the remaining coefficients are statistically in- High temperature more than 250C (room temperature) was significant at 95% confidence level. not preferred because of its high cost in macro scale. Accord- ing to the preliminary experiments, initial dye concentra- TABLE 2 - Variable levels of the factors tion was determined as 100 ppm to measure COD accu- Factors -1 0 +1 rately. On the other hand, high H2O2 concentration more than 0.5 mM causes interference with COD. pH of the reaction (A) 2 4 6 Catalyst concentration (B) g/250 mL 0.2 0.6 1 To evaluate the influence of operating parameters on Stirring speed (C) rpm 150 200 250 color and COD removal efficiency of DO26 contaminated Reaction time (D) min. 10 35 60 wastewater, four different factors were chosen for analysis: pH of the reaction (A), catalyst amount (B), stirring speed In order to test whether the reduced model is adequate re- (C) and reaction time (D) under the following conditions: a garding with lack of fit and curvature effects, analysis of var- temperature of 250C, 100 ppm initial dye concentration and iance (ANOVA) was carried out. The results of ANOVA for 0.5 mM H2O2 concentration. After the preliminary experi- percentage of color and COD removal are given in Table 6 ments, 24 full factorial design with center points (20 experi- and 7. According to the analysis of variance results for color ments), was employed for the optimization of color and removal, the impact of the curvature effect was not found COD removal as response variables. Experimental data to be significant, meaning that the first order model is suit- were analyzed using Design Expert software from Stat able for the process concerned. All the main effects and Ease Inc., USA. The levels and ranges of factors are given AB, ABD, BCD interactions effects are statistically signif- in Table 2. icant (p<0.05). On omitting the coefficients not significant Base level experiments were carried out to determine at 95% confidence level, Y1 was given in terms of coded critical factors and respected levels, and to test adequacy of variables and represents % color removal in Eq. (3): the model (Table 3). The coefficients of the empirical . . . . model for percentage of color and COD removal were cal- . . . . (3)
TABLE 3 - 24 full factorial experiments for color and COD removal
Color Removal COD Removal Run A B C D Actual Predicted Actual Predicted 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 34.318 36.852 31.25 32.656 2 1 -1 -1 -1 12.682 10.534 10.00 5.7812 3 -1 1 -1 -1 67.591 69.455 56.25 55.156 4 1 1 -1 -1 42.864 42.932 41.25 45.781 5 -1 -1 1 -1 49.227 43.738 52.50 51.406 6 1 -1 1 -1 17.410 17.420 12.50 14.531 7 -1 1 1 -1 87.818 88.091 68.75 65.781 8 1 1 1 -1 58.682 61.568 45.00 46.406 9 -1 -1 -1 1 61.773 66.818 45.00 46.094 10 1 -1 -1 1 23.409 21.522 17.50 19.218 11 -1 1 -1 1 95.364 92.193 70.00 68.593 12 1 1 -1 1 86.955 84.647 61.25 59.218 13 -1 -1 1 1 87.545 85.454 66.25 64.843 14 1 -1 1 1 36.136 40.159 27.50 27.969 15 -1 1 1 1 98.045 99.080 73.75 79.219 16 1 1 1 1 92.182 91.534 63.75 59.844 17 0 0 0 0 53.591 59.500 40.00 46.406 18 0 0 0 0 58.682 59.500 45.00 46.406 19 0 0 0 0 59.227 59.500 47.50 46.406 20 0 0 0 0 55.955 59.500 46.25 46.406
3720 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
TABLE 4 - Coefficients for color removal TABLE 5 - Coefficients for COD removal
Factor Effect Coef SE Coef T p Factor Effect Coef SE Coef T p Intercept -- 59.500 0.652 91.2 0.000 Intercept -- 46.41 0.822 56.46 0.000 A -26.42 -13.210 0.652 -20.25 0.000 A -23.12 -11.56 0.822 -14.07 0.001 B 38.37 19.188 0.652 29.41 0.000 B 27.19 13.59 0.822 16.54 0.000 C 12.76 6.381 0.652 9.78 0.002 C 9.69 4.84 0.822 5.89 0.01 D 26.35 13.176 0.652 20.20 0.000 D 13.44 6.72 0.822 8.18 0.004 AB 9.39 4.693 0.652 7.19 0.006 AB 8.75 4.38 0.822 5.32 0.013 AC -3.14 -1.570 0.652 -2.4 0.096* AC -5.0 -2.5 0.822 -3.04 0.056* AD 0.41 0.200 0.652 0.31 0.774* AD 1.88 0.94 0.822 1.14 0.337* BC -1.77 -0.890 0.652 -1.36 0.267* BC -4.06 -2.03 0.822 -2.47 0.090* BD 2.55 1.270 0.652 1.95 0.146* BD 0.94 0.47 0.822 0.57 0.608* CD -1.16 -0.580 0.652 -0.89 0.440* CD -0.31 -0.16 0.822 -0.19 0.861* ABC 2.67 1.340 0.652 2.05 0.133* ABC 2.5 1.25 0.822 1.52 0.226* ABD 9.49 4.744 0.652 7.27 0.005 ABD 3.13 1.56 0.822 1.90 0.153* ACD 0.51 0.260 0.652 0.39 0.721* ACD 1.88 0.94 0.822 1.14 0.337* BCD -5.87 -2.938 0.652 -4.5 0.020 BCD -2.19 -1.09 0.822 -1.33 0.275* ABCD 1.23 0,610 0.652 0.94 0.416* ABCD 0.00 0.00 0.822 0.00 1.000* Center Point -- -2.636 1.459 -1.81 0.168* Center Point -- -1.72 1.838 -0.94 0.419* *insignificant coefficients at 95% confidence level (p>0.05) *insignificant coefficients at 95% confidence level (p>0.05)
TABLE 6 - ANOVA results for color removal
Sum of Mean F p-value Source Squares df Square Value Prob > F Model 12962.52 7 1851.788 271.9252 < 0.0001 significant A-pH 2792.162 1 2792.162 410.014 < 0.0001 B-Catalyst amount 5890.563 1 5890.563 864.9976 < 0.0001 C-Stirring speed 651.4096 1 651.4096 95.65602 < 0.0001 D-Time 2777.769 1 2777.769 407.9006 < 0.0001 AB 352.4153 1 352.4153 51.7503 0.0004 ABD 360.1369 1 360.1369 52.88418 0.0003 BCD 138.0625 1 138.0625 20.27374 0.0041 Curvature 22.24132 1 22.24132 3.266019 0.1207 not significant Residual 40.8595 6 6.809917 Lack of Fit 20.42975 3 6.809917 1 0.5000 not significant Pure Error 20.42975 3 6.809917 Cor Total 13025.62 14 Model 12962.52 7 1851.788 271.9252 < 0.0001 significant R2: 0.997 R2(adj): 0.993 R2(pred):0.961
TABLE 7 - ANOVA results for COD removal
Sum of Mean F p-value Source Squares df Square Value Prob > F Model 6665.625 7 952.2321 70.93878 < 0.0001 significant A-pH 2139.063 1 2139.063 159.3545 < 0.0001 B-Catalyst amount 2956.641 1 2956.641 220.2619 < 0.0001 C-Stirring speed 375.3906 1 375.3906 27.96561 0.0003 D-Time 722.2656 1 722.2656 53.80688 < 0.0001 AB 306.25 1 306.25 22.81481 0.0006 AC 100 1 100 7.449735 0.0196 BC 66.01562 1 66.01562 4.917989 0.0486 Curvature 9.453125 1 9.453125 0.704233 0.4192 not significant Residual 147.6563 11 13.4233 Lack of Fit 115.2344 8 14.4043 1.332831 0.4478 not significant Pure Error 32.42188 3 10.80729 Cor Total 6822.734 19 R2: 0.990 R2(adj): 0.979 R2(pred):0.923
3721 © by PSP Volume 24 – No 11a. 2015 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
According to the Table 5, the coefficients of all the lyst amount provides higher percentage. On the other hand, main effects and AB interaction effect are statistically sig- high level of time provides an important effect in terms of nificant (p<0.05) and the remaining coefficients are statis- percentage of color and COD removal than stirring speed. tically insignificant at 95% confidence level. However, by In addition, catalyst amount is considered the most im- considering the ANOVA results of COD removal for all portant factor among others due to a steep slope appear in the second and third order interactions and to ensure the Fig. 2 and 5. hierarchical model structure AC and BC interaction effects It is stated from AB, ABD and BCD interaction plots were included to the model given in Eq. (4): from Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 higher percentage of color removal