Csop1197.Pdf (8.424Mb)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Summary of Proceedings and Decisions International Centers Week Washington,D.C. October27-31,1997 ~ ResearchImpact: Yesterday’Achievements,s Tomorrow’sChctllenges CGIAR Centers CIAT Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (International Center for Tropical Agriculture) Cali, Colombia CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research Bogor, Indonesia CIMMYT Centro International de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trig0 (International Center for the Improvement of Maize and Wheat) Mexico City, Mexico CIP Centro International de la Papa (International Potato Center) Lima, Peru ICARDA International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Aleppo, Syria ICIARM International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management Metro Manila, The Philippines ICRAF International Centre for Research in Agroforestry Nairobi, Kenya ICRISAT International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, DC, United States of America IIMI International Irrigation Management Institute Colombo, Sri Lanka IITA International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Ibadan, Nigeria ILRI International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi, Kenya IPGRI International Plant Genetic Resources Institute Rome, Italy IRRI International Rice Research Institute Manila, The Philippines ISNAR International Service for National Agricultural Research The Hague, The Netherlands WARDA West Africa Rice Development Association Bouake, C&e d’Ivoire Summary of Proceedings and Decisions CGIAR International Centers Week October 27-s&1997 Washington, DC Research Impact: Yesterday ‘s Achievements, Tomorrow ‘s Challenges ICLARM and IRRI e The Philippines Kenya Issued by the CGIAR Secretariat 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA Telephone: l-202-473-8951 l Fax: l-202-473-8110 E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Internet: http: \ \ www.cgiar.org January 1998 Table of Contents MAJOR DECISIONS .................................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS ................................................................................................................... 3 I. Opening Statement by CGIAR Chairman Ismail Serageldin .......................................................... .3 II. New and Potential Members ........................................................................................................... .8 III. Overview of the World Food Situation ............................................................................................ 9 IV. Genetic Resources and Biodiversity ............................................................................................... 11 V. Impact of the CGIAR ....................................................................................................................... 13 VI. Biotechnology in the CGIAR ......................................................................................................... .24 VII. Review of the CGIAR System ......................................................................................................... 30 VTII. Financing the 1998 Research Agenda ............................................................................................ 33 IX. 1999 Research Directions and Funding ........................................................................................ .3j X. Progress on Strengthening the Global Forum ............................................................................... 35 XI. Reports from CGIAR Cosponsors and Committees ...................................................................... .36 XII. Honors Conferred .......................................................................................................................... .42 XIII Other Business ............................................................................................................................... .43 XIV. CGIAR Chairman’s Summation ...................................................................................................... .43 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... 49 ANNEXES .................................................................................................................................................. 51 Annex I: ICW97 Draft Agenda ............................................................................................................. 51 Annex II: List of Documents ................................................................................................................. jj Annex III: List of Participants ................................................................................................................. 57 CGIAR ICW97 Major Decisions The Group took the following major decisions at International Centers \Veek 1997: NEW CGIAR MEMBERS evaluation, and feedback. In col- I tential downstream and ecological laboration with the centers; TAC, effects of new technologies. The Group admitted New and other institutions, the IAEG q Zealand, Peru, and Portu- should continue efforts to identify Centers must abide by the gal to CGIAR membership by ac- and develop the most appropriate highest standards of clamation, bringing the total num- evaluation methodologies for the biosafety in carrying out their ber of members to 57, of which 19 CGIAR. Evaluation should be har- work, including standards in place are from developing countries, 21 monized across centers as much at the national level. from industrial countries, 2 from as possible, and the use of com- economies in transition, 3 from mon methodologies encouraged. The free flow of know- private foundations, and 12 from H: edge, information. and international and regional organi- The Group determined that technology from CGIAR centers to zations. broad assessments of the NARS must continue (and not be complex linkages between the slowed down). The CGIAR may [See pages 8 to 9 for further de- work of the CGIAR and the ben- have to consider defensive patent- tails.] efits across society at large are ing, to ensure that poor farmers needed. The CGIAR should focus have access to new technologies. GENETIC RESOURCES AND on case studies where quantitative BIODIVERSITY analysis is feasible, enhancing this The CGIAR should seek ad- with qualitative analysis to provide vice on legal issues and The Group adopted draft richness and breadth. ramifications of proprietary science El Ethical Principles Relating and the complex partnerships that to Genetic Resources as an interim The Group asked the have arisen in this area. statement, on the understanding IAEG to provide two types that the principles would remain of impact assessments: those The composition of the two under review in light of decisions which show direct links of agri- q expert panels convened taken in evolving international fora cultural research with the devel- under the auspices of TAC (on gen- and subject to input received from opment objectives of donor eral issues in biotechnology and CGIAR stakeholders. The Group agencies; and short, pithy state- on proprietary science and tech- agreed to review the draft ethical ments on CGIAR impact that nology) should be broadened, to principles at MTlM98, and amend demonstrate the importance of include in particular more experi- them as needed. continued investment in interna- ence from the South. tional agricultural research. [See pages 11 to 13 for further [See pages 24 to 30 for further details.] [See pages 13 to 24 for further details.] details.1 IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW OF THE CGIAR SYSTEM EVALUATION BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE CGIAR The Group broadly en- The Group reaffirmed that dorsed the system review El the CGIAR system should The Group agreed that the panel’s planned work program, promote and nurture an evaluation q CGIAR has a responsibility urging the panel to reach out to a culture as an internal means of to look beyond the generation of broad constituency to ensure an quality enhancement, through a technology to biosafety regulations open process in which all view- continuous process of monitoring, at the national level and the po- points are taken into consideration. CGIAFt ICW97 The panel should take particular other developing countries, be- Kenya Agricultural Research Insti- care to hear the voices of NGOs, cause of their eligibility for ODA tute (KARI) and ILRI. Outstanding women, and NARS, especially from under the D-AC criteria. Scientific Partnership Award Sub-Saharan Africa. [See pages 33 to 3j for further The Group unanimously [See pages 30 to 32 for further details.] LIB adopted resolutions to details.1 honor Robert McNamara and 1999 RESEARCH DIRECTIONS Ernest Corea, respectively, for their FINANCING THE 1998 AND FUNDING contributions and service to the RESEARCH AGENDA CGIAR. In keeping with the cycle The Group endorsed cen- q of decisionmaking en- [See pages 42 to 43 for further ter financing plans for 1998: dorsed at MTM95, the Group com- details.1 and approved an overall CGIAR missioned the preparation of the financing plan of $345 million. 1999 research agenda by the cen- FUTURE MEETINGS Centers should plan for 1998 on ters, which will be viewed in the the basis of identified funding. context of the 1998-2000 center . The Group agreed with the The Group will review updated medium-term plans endorsed by q0 following dates and loca- 1998 center financing