DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of Conservation Targets for the Lower Hudson PRISM (LHP) Final Report: July 1 to September 15, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of Conservation Targets for the Lower Hudson PRISM (LHP) Final Report: July 1 to September 15, 2014 Development of Conservation Targets for the Lower Hudson PRISM (LHP) Final Report: July 1 to September 15, 2014 John Mickelson Geospatial & Ecological Services 501 Stage Road Monroe NY, 10950-3217 (845) 893-4110, [email protected] Figure 1. Lower Hudson PRISM region Figure 2. Lower Hudson PRISM and adjacent counties Review of Completed Scope of Work: LHP Action Plan Items Addressed: all contracted project tasks have been completed for the LHP Goals and Objectives of the Lower Hudson 2014 Action Plan 2.1 and 2.2 and 3.1, as outlined within the Project Deliverables section (see Appendix A). While active participation and input of the Conservation Target Working Group has remained muted, the consultant has accomplished the following and will continue through with meetings with the LHP Partners Meeting (Oct 1, 2014) and the Conservation Targets working group meeting (November 5, 2014), to continue momentum into the 2015 project year. Specific project accomplishments include. : GOAL 2: CONSERVATION TARGETS STATUS Priority Strategies (ranked): 1. Coordinating Conservation Target Partners 2. Managing IS strategically 3. Assessment and Monitoring Network Objective 2.1 Engage Partners COMPLETED Since the projects inception, research has engaged important and valuable conservation efforts conducted by over 22 regional agencies and programs (see Table 1) that the LHP might benefit from considering when developing Conservation Targets. All of these have been engaged and valuable geospatial & thematic data have been acquired from many of these potential partners. Four agencies feature especially prominently within our region and form the core of the proposed Conservation Target overlay matrices (see Conservation Target section below): • New York State Natural Heritage Program • Hudson River Estuary Program • The Nature Conservancy • New York Audubon Society These groups (collectively referred to hereafter as CTLA) should be prioritized for partnership relationships over the coming years. New York State Natural Heritage Program The NYS-NHP exists to “facilitate conservation of New York's biodiversity by providing comprehensive information and scientific expertise on rare species and natural ecosystems to resource managers and other conservation partners.” The information acquired, developed, stewarded and employed helps to conserve all known SGCN species and their respective habitats and resources across the region, through SEQR processes as well as through local implementations. Our mission is to facilitate conservation of rare animals, rare plants, and natural ecosystems, which we commonly refer to as "natural communities." We accomplish this 1 mission by working collaboratively with partners inside and outside New York to support stewardship of New York's rare plants, rare animals, and significant natural communities, and to reduce the threat of invasive species to native ecosystems. We combine thorough field inventories, scientific analyses, expert interpretation, and comprehensive databases on New York's flora and fauna to deliver quality information to partners working in natural resource conservation. The end result of our actions will be more compatible management activities around our most imperiled species, ecosystems, and high-quality natural areas, in order to have significant and lasting effects on the preservation of New York's biodiversity. The NYS-NHP data forms the basis for establishing and developing virtually all the conservation programs and targets within New York State and serves at the heart of all fine-filter, species conservation programs. They have been very helpful and supportive with data requests and suggestions and Steve Young, the NYS-NHP botanist and LIISMA coordinator, in particular has been kind in his time and expertise in suggesting approaches such as for LHP conservation efforts and Invasive Species Prevention Zones (ISPZ). Heritage Program support and guidance will be invaluable in coming years. Hudson River Estuary Program As part of the NYS-DEC, the Hudson River Estuary Program seeks to protect and improve the natural and scenic Hudson River watershed for all its residents through: ensuring clean water, protecting and restoring fish, wildlife and their habitats, providing water recreation and river access, adapting to climate change and conserving world-famous scenery. In 2005, a convergence of some 60+ regional ecologists, wildlife biologists, resource managers and conservation planners met in a series of workshops, led by The Nature Conservancy, to collaboratively establish conservation priorities for the Hudson River Estuary. One important outcome was the detailed summary: “Advancing Biodiversity Conservation in the Hudson River Estuary Watershed: A Report on the Products of a Multi-Stakeholder Workshop Series” available via: http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/5094.html#Target. This summary document outlines a considered conservation approach by the assembled group to seven broad systems as conservation targets: • The estuary ecosystem • Migratory fish • Tributaries and riparian zones • Non-tidal wetlands • Lakes and ponds • Large unfragmented forests • Non-forested upland communities • Connectivity features and corridor Within a matrix listing the range of threats to each of the targets, invasive species loomed as the single most uniform stress on all systems (Appendix B.). This 2 highlights the importance of our PRISMs efforts as well as the work we have cut out for us. A great many suggestions and recommendations were outlined within the report, including valuable details as to how best to approach invasive species management. Given the breadth, depth and extent of expert inputs to this plan, I’d suggest it form a core constituent in the formation of our conservation targets. A second valuable HREP assessment report, produced in partnership with the DEC, Cornell University and the NY Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research unit, is the 2006 “Wildlife and Habitat Conservation Framework: an Approach for Conserving Biodiversity in the Hudson River Estuary Corridor”. http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/remediation_hudson_pdf/hrebcf.pdf. This extensive analysis includes detailed descriptions and maps of 23 of the important habitats and biodiversity areas within the Hudson River estuary; 17 of which fall within the LHP region (Figure 1.). Given that these features contain such a high concentration of known NYS Heritage element occurrences (rare, endangered, special concern species etc.) (Figure 2.), I would propose that this map form the backbone of a LHP regional coarse-filter conservation approach. The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy specializes in the development of science and metric- based conservation approaches that aid disparate conservation agencies to collaboratively focus efforts for a common good. Detailed ecoregion plans have been developed for much of the United States and are distributed together with comprehensive geospatial information for each region. Such data includes matrices of species of conservation concern associated with their required habitats and (generalized) know locations and also undergoes extensive, occurrence-based assessments to consider population size and viability. Few other conservation programs in our area deliver such a robust approach. While the LHP falls predominantly with the Lower New England\Northern Piedmont (LNE) ecoregion, it also contains small, though important, areas within the North Atlantic Coast and High Allegheny Plateau ecoregions (Figure 3.). Baseline physical and biotic geospatial layers for all of these regions are provided representing variables such as: ecoregions (multiple levels), elevation and derivatives, soils, geography, ecological land units, hydrology, drainable basins, census blocks (multi-year), open space\park lands, EPA monitored pollution sites, cities, roads, dams, forest blocks, matrix ecosystems, and especially portfolio selections of priority areas (high biodiversity areas containing species occurrence locations of viable populations of important conservation species). (Figure 4.) See also: http://www.uspriorityareas.tnc.org/ Given the enormous effort, experience and historical involvement that TNC has and continues to invest in developing effective conservation approaches for our region, they should remain one of our most important potential project partners. 3 New York Audubon Society Audubon NY has long worked to research and document the needs of regional bird species and their habitats within the Hudson Valley region and since 1995 has been working to establish protection for bird “hot spot” area, or Important Bird Areas (IBA) (Figure 5., Table 2.). For the NY Audubon Society “Habitat is the key to conservation. To thrive, all species need the right kinds of places to carry out the business of living and reproducing. Without adequate and appropriate places to nest, forage, rest during migration, and over-winter, bird populations decline. The Important Bird Areas (IBA) program is an international bird conservation initiative with simple goals: to identify the most important places for birds, and to conserve them. IBAs are identified according to standardized, scientific criteria through a collaborative effort among state, national, and international non-governmental conservation organizations (NGOs), state and federal government agencies, local conservation groups, academics, grassroots environmentalists, and birders. As a result, IBAs link global and continental bird conservation priorities to local sites that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ivory Silk' Japanese Tree Lilac
    Fact Sheet ST-611 October 1994 Syringa reticulata ‘Ivory Silk’ ‘Ivory Silk’ Japanese Tree Lilac1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION Although a Lilac, this member of the species is quite different in appearance than those with which gardeners are more familiar (Fig. 1). Its upright habit varies from symmetrical to irregular but is more consistent than the species. Cultivars including ‘Ivory Silk’ and ‘Summer Snow’ could be used instead of the species due to the more consistent habit and more flowers. ‘Ivory Silk’ grows well only in USDA hardiness zones 3 through six (perhaps into 7) and has an oval or pyramidal form when young but spreads to a rounded shape as it grows older. This is a very large shrub or small tree, reaching a height of about 20 to 30 feet with a 15-foot-spread. The huge clusters of creamy white flowers, borne in early summer for about two weeks, are the main ornamental feature but lack the fragrance of the spring-blooming Lilacs -- this Lilac’s fragrance is more suggestive of Privet. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Syringa reticulata ‘Ivory Silk’ Pronunciation: sih-RING-guh reh-tick-yoo-LAY-tuh Common name(s): ‘Ivory Silk’ Japanese Tree Lilac Family: Oleaceae Figure 1. Mature ‘Ivory Silk’ Japanese Tree Lilac. USDA hardiness zones: 3A through 7A (Fig. 2) Origin: not native to North America sidewalk cutout (tree pit); residential street tree; tree Uses: container or above-ground planter; large has been successfully grown in urban areas where air parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in size); wide pollution, poor drainage, compacted soil, and/or tree lawns (>6 feet wide); medium-sized tree lawns drought are common (4-6 feet wide); recommended for buffer strips around Availability: somewhat available, may have to go out parking lots or for median strip plantings in the of the region to find the tree highway; near a deck or patio; screen; trainable as a standard; narrow tree lawns (3-4 feet wide); specimen; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Guangdong, 28 April to 7 May 1998
    Report of Rapid Biodiversity Assessments at Qixingkeng Nature Reserve, Southwest Guangdong, 29 April to 1 May and 24 November to 1 December, 1998 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden in collaboration with Guangdong Provincial Forestry Department South China Institute of Botany South China Agricultural University South China Normal University Xinyang Teachers’ College January 2002 South China Biodiversity Survey Report Series: No. 4 (Online Simplified Version) Report of Rapid Biodiversity Assessments at Qixingkeng Nature Reserve, Southwest Guangdong, 29 April to 1 May and 24 November to 1 December, 1998 Editors John R. Fellowes, Michael W.N. Lau, Billy C.H. Hau, Ng Sai-Chit and Bosco P.L. Chan Contributors Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden: Bosco P.L. Chan (BC) Lawrence K.C. Chau (LC) John R. Fellowes (JRF) Billy C.H. Hau (BH) Michael W.N. Lau (ML) Lee Kwok Shing (LKS) Ng Sai-Chit (NSC) Graham T. Reels (GTR) Gloria L.P. Siu (GS) South China Institute of Botany: Chen Binghui (CBH) Deng Yunfei (DYF) Wang Ruijiang (WRJ) South China Agricultural University: Xiao Mianyuan (XMY) South China Normal University: Chen Xianglin (CXL) Li Zhenchang (LZC) Xinyang Teachers’ College: Li Hongjing (LHJ) Voluntary consultants: Guillaume de Rougemont (GDR) Keith Wilson (KW) Background The present report details the findings of two field trips in Southwest Guangdong by members of Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden (KFBG) in Hong Kong and their colleagues, as part of KFBG's South China Biodiversity Conservation Programme. The overall aim of the programme is to minimise the loss of forest biodiversity in the region, and the emphasis in the first three years is on gathering up-to-date information on the distribution and status of fauna and flora.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants
    E TG/NASTU(proj.3) ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2018-08-03 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS Geneva DRAFT * WATERCRESS UPOV Code(s): NASTU_MIC; NASTU_OFF; NASTU_STE Nasturtium microphyllum Boenn. ex Rchb.; Nasturtium officinale R. Br.; Nasturtium xsterile (Airy Shaw) Oefelein GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY prepared by experts from United Kingdom to be considered by the Technical Working Party for Vegetables at its fifty-second session, to be held in Beijing, China, from 2018-09-17 to 2018-09-21 Disclaimer: this document does not represent UPOV policies or guidance Alternative names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Nasturtium microphyllum One-row watercress Boenn. ex Rchb. Nasturtium officinale R. Br., Watercress cresson de fontaine; Brunnenkresse berro Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum cresson d'eau (L.) Hayek Nasturtium xsterile (Airy Shaw) Oefelein, Nasturtium microphyllum x Nasturtium officinale, Rorippa microphylla x Rorippa nasturtium- aquaticum The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] TG/NASTU(proj.3) Watercress, 2018-08-03 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of the Possum Walk Trail at the Infinity Science Center, Hancock County, Mississippi
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Spring 5-2016 Vascular Flora of the Possum Walk Trail at the Infinity Science Center, Hancock County, Mississippi Hanna M. Miller University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Biodiversity Commons, and the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Hanna M., "Vascular Flora of the Possum Walk Trail at the Infinity Science Center, Hancock County, Mississippi" (2016). Honors Theses. 389. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/389 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi Vascular Flora of the Possum Walk Trail at the Infinity Science Center, Hancock County, Mississippi by Hanna Miller A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in the Department of Biological Sciences May 2016 ii Approved by _________________________________ Mac H. Alford, Ph.D., Thesis Adviser Professor of Biological Sciences _________________________________ Shiao Y. Wang, Ph.D., Chair Department of Biological Sciences _________________________________ Ellen Weinauer, Ph.D., Dean Honors College iii Abstract The North American Coastal Plain contains some of the highest plant diversity in the temperate world. However, most of the region has remained unstudied, resulting in a lack of knowledge about the unique plant communities present there.
    [Show full text]
  • WRA.Datasheet.Template (Version 1) (Version 1).Xlsx
    Assessment date 18 April 2016 Clematis terniflora ALL ZONES Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.01 Species suited to Florida's USDA climate zones (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2 North Zone: suited to Zones 8, 9 Central Zone: suited to Zones 9, 10 South Zone: suited to Zone 10 2.02 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2 2.03 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y 1 2.04 Native or naturalized in habitats with periodic inundation y North Zone: mean annual precipitation 50-70 inches Central Zone: mean annual precipitation 40-60 inches South Zone: mean annual precipitation 40-60 inches 1 2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y 3.01 Naturalized beyond native range y 2 3.02 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed unk 3.03 Weed of agriculture n 0 3.04 Environmental weed y 4 3.05 Congeneric weed y 2 4.01 Produces spines, thorns or burrs n 0 4.02 Allelopathic unk 0 4.03 Parasitic n 0 4.04 Unpalatable to grazing animals ? 4.05 Toxic to animals ? 4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens n 0 4.07 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans unk 0 4.08 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems unk 0 4.09 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle n 0 4.10 Grows on infertile soils (oligotrophic, limerock, or excessively draining soils).
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Delaware Invasive Plants Booklet
    Planting for a livable Delaware Widespread and Invasive Growth Habit 1. Multiflora rose Rosa multiflora S 2. Oriental bittersweet Celastrus orbiculata V 3. Japanese stilt grass Microstegium vimineum H 4. Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum H 5. Russian olive Elaeagnus umbellata S 6. Norway maple Acer platanoides T 7. Common reed Phragmites australis H 8. Hydrilla Hydrilla verticillata A 9. Mile-a-minute Polygonum perfoliatum V 10. Clematis Clematis terniflora S 11. Privet Several species S 12. European sweetflag Acorus calamus H 13. Wineberry Rubus phoenicolasius S 14. Bamboo Several species H Restricted and Invasive 15. Japanese barberry Berberis thunbergii S 16. Periwinkle Vinca minor V 17. Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata H 18. Winged euonymus Euonymus alata S 19. Porcelainberry Ampelopsis brevipedunculata V 20. Bradford pear Pyrus calleryana T 21. Marsh dewflower Murdannia keisak H 22. Lesser celandine Ranunculus ficaria H 23. Purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria H 24. Reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea H 25. Honeysuckle Lonicera species S 26. Tree of heaven Alianthus altissima T 27. Spotted knapweed Centaruea biebersteinii H Restricted and Potentially-Invasive 28. Butterfly bush Buddleia davidii S Growth Habit: S=shrub, V=vine, H=herbaceous, T=tree, A=aquatic THE LIST • Plants on The List are non-native to Delaware, have the potential for widespread dispersal and establishment, can out-compete other species in the same area, and have the potential for rapid growth, high seed or propagule production, and establishment in natural areas. • Plants on Delaware’s Invasive Plant List were chosen by a committee of experts in environmental science and botany, as well as representatives of State agencies and the Nursery and Landscape Industry.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Pinellia Ternata Leaves Exposed to Heat Stress
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 20614-20634; doi:10.3390/ijms141020614 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Article A Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Pinellia ternata Leaves Exposed to Heat Stress Yunhao Zhu 1, Guosheng Zhu 2, Qiaosheng Guo 1,*, Zaibiao Zhu 1, Changlin Wang 1 and Zuoyi Liu 3,* 1 Institute of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (Z.Z.); [email protected] (C.W.) 2 Institute of Morden Chinese Medical Materials, Guizhou Academy of Agricaltural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (Q.G.); [email protected] (Z.L.); Tel./Fax: +86-25-8439-5980 (Q.G.); Tel./Fax: +86-85-1376-1761 (Z.L.). Received: 20 July 2013; in revised form: 22 September 2013 / Accepted: 29 September 2013 / Published: 15 October 2013 Abstract: Pinellia ternata is an important traditional Chinese medicinal plant. The growth of P. ternata is sensitive to high temperatures. To gain a better understanding of heat stress responses in P. ternata, we performed a comparative proteomic analysis. P. ternata seedlings were subjected to a temperature of 38 °C and samples were collected 24 h after treatment. Increased relative ion leakage and lipid peroxidation suggested that oxidative stress was frequently generated in rice leaves exposed to high temperature. Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) was used to analyze heat-responsive proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting ANPC's Rare Plants Book
    Iris No. 69 • January 2013 The Alberta Native Plant Council Newsletter Revisiting ANPC’s Rare Plants Book by Linda Kershaw of Alberta, you will see that each Line drawing – Illustrations came consists of five main components: from a variety of sources, including an a block of text (name, description, ANHIC collection of commissioned and notes); a photo; a line drawing; drawings and a variety of previously an Alberta distribution map; a North published works (most notably the America distribution map. five-volume Flora of the Pacific Northwest published by the University of Text – Although the four editors Washington Press). The ANPC even compiled, organized, and edited the commissioned some original drawings information, there were also more to fill the last remaining gaps. than 30 additional Alberta botanists who contributed species accounts Alberta distribution map – The and other text (you can see their detailed Alberta dot maps were smiling faces on page 483 of the provided by ANHIC during the last book). Alberta Environment staff days of production. These were (first through the Recreation and generated electronically using the Protected Areas Program and later ANHIC/ACIMS (Alberta Conservation through the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Management System) Information Centre [ANHIC]) was database. key to the project, from generating When Rare Vascular Plants of Alberta the initial species list to sorting out North America distribution map was finally published in 2001, it was taxonomic problems and providing a – The Biota of North America the culmination of 10 years of work wide range of information. Also, several Program (BONAP) at the University of involving many dedicated volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genera of Bambusoideae (Gramineae) in the Southeastern United States Gordon C
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Faculty Research & Creative Activity Biological Sciences January 1988 The genera of Bambusoideae (Gramineae) in the southeastern United States Gordon C. Tucker Eastern Illinois University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Tucker, Gordon C., "The eg nera of Bambusoideae (Gramineae) in the southeastern United States" (1988). Faculty Research & Creative Activity. 181. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac/181 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research & Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TUCKER, BAMBUSOIDEAE 239 THE GENERA OF BAMBUSOIDEAE (GRAMINEAE) IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATESu GoRDON C. T ucKER3 Subfamily BAMBUSOIDEAE Ascherson & Graebner, Synop. Mitteleurop. Fl. 2: 769. 1902. Perennial or annual herbs or woody plants of tropical or temperate forests and wetlands. Rhizomes present or lacking. Stems erect or decumbent (some­ times rooting at the lower nodes); nodes glabrous, pubescent, or puberulent. Leaves several to many, glabrous to sparsely pubescent (microhairs bicellular); leaf sheaths about as long as the blades, open for over tf2 their length, glabrous; ligules wider than long, entire or fimbriate; blades petiolate or sessile, elliptic to linear, acute to acuminate, the primary veins parallel to-or forming an angle of 5-10• wi th-the midvein, transverse veinlets numerous, usually con­ spicuous, giving leaf surface a tessellate appearance; chlorenchyma not radiate (i.e., non-kranz; photosynthetic pathway C.,).
    [Show full text]