sign in sign up
<<
Home , Chopping tool, Java Man, Olduvai Gorge

Paper No. : 01 Physical/Biological Anthropology Module : 18 erectus

Development Team

Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Principal Investigator Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi

Paper Coordinator Prof. Subho Roy Department of Anthropology ,University of Calcutta

Dr. Arpita Mandal (Nandi) Content Writer Department of Anthropology, Narsinha Dutt College, Howrah

Content Reviewer Prof. Barun Mukhopadhyay Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata

1

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology

Description Of Module

Subject Name Anthropology

Paper Name 01 Physical/ Biological Anthropology

Module Name/Title Homo erectus Module Id 18

2

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Contents of this unit  About Homo erectus  Variations and their Distribution  Time Period  Anatomical Features  Cultural Remains  Other Aspects of Culture  Dispersal of Homo erectus  Ascribed the Status of Being the First  Behavioral Inferences  Phylogenetic / Evolutionary Relationships  Theories of Change

Learning Objectives

 Who is Homo erectus?  Distributions  Important Position in

3

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Homo erectus

Source: Photobucket.com Introduction The first was found from in 1891 by the Dutch anatomist, Eugene Dubois. The exact locale was river bed in , and its common name assigned is “Java man”. The materials found were: a cap, a complete femur, three teeth, and a jaw fragment. This specimen was formerly referred to as “Pithecanthropus erectus” meaning an apeman who could walk straight. The femur found among the other materials showed prominent linea aspera, a criterion for erect posture and while the skull cap denoted brain volume as that of present day . The dating of this fossil is middle about 500,000 ago.

Original of pithecanthropus erectus (now homo erectus) found in java in 1891. Source: Wikipedia

Later, in 1929 a Chinese paleontologist, W.C. Pei, discovered a dozen incomplete but identifiable , mandibles, 147 teeth, and some fragments of the post-cranial skeleton. These also dated to middle pleistocene about 300,000 years ago. The exact locale was , some 30 miles southwest of Peking, China, which is why we assign the common name as “”. Its original name was “Sinanthropus pekinensis” meaning apeman from China. 4

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

It was later analyzed that the anatomical differences between these two fossil finds lie at the sub- specific level. So, both the finds were placed under the same and species and are thus now known as: Homo erectus erectus and Homo erectus pekinensis respectively. This reclassification proved to be the most significant development on two counts: 1. It reflected the incorporation of modern evolutionary thinking into hominid . 2. The simplification in terminology, as it was based on sound biological principles, refocused research away from endless arguments regarding classification to broader populational, behavioural and ecological considerations.

Several fossils that can be attributed to Homo erectus were later found from several sites of Europe and Africa. Here are some of the sites mentioned restricting to the most important and the best preserved specimens: 1. Java 2. Zhoukoudian 3. Lantien (China) 4. Heidelberg 5. Vertesszollos (Hungary) 6. Arago (France) 7. Ternifine (Algeria) 8. Rabat (Morocco) 9. (Kenya) 10. 11. Swartkrans 12. Saldanha

Source:- http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_2.htm

5

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Date of fossil Cranial capacity (years ago) (in cm.3)

Africa: East turkana 1,900,000-1,600,000 850-900 West turkana 1,500,000 Olduvai gorge 1,300,000-700,000 1067 Bouri 1,000,000 Swartkrans 1,800,000-1,500,000 Ternifine 700,000-500,000

Sale 400,000 900 Israel: 1,600,000-1,400,000

Europe: 1,750,000 600-650 Atapuerca 1,200,000 - Java: Modjokerto 1,800,000 ---- 1,800,000-1,600,000 813-1059 Trinil 900,000 ? ----

Ngandong 546,000-143,000 ? China: Yuanmou 1,700,000 ?

Lantian 800,000 780 Zhoukoudian 770,000-400,000 850-1250 Hexian 400,000 1025

6

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Dating the fossils To reconstruct the position of H. erectus in hominin evolution, it is essential to define the place of this species in time, and modern paleoanthropologists have at their disposal a variety of techniques that permit them to do so with great precision. Potassium-argon dating, for instance, can provide the age of a specimen by clocking the rate at which radioactive isotopes of these elements have decayed. When radiometric methods cannot be applied, investigators may still ascribe a relative age to a fossil by relating it to the other contents of the deposit in which it was found. Such lines of evidence have led to the tentative conclusion that H. Erectus flourished over a long interval of pleistocene time. The fossils recovered at Koobi Fora are from about 1.7 mya, and OH 9 from Olduvai are probably 1.2 million years old. The specimens from Sangiran and Mojokerto in Java may approach the age of the Koobi Fora skeletons, and one from the Lantian localities in China is roughly contemporary with OH 9. The youngest hominins generally accepted as H. erectus are from Tighenif in Algeria (800–600 kya), Zhoukoudian in China (770–230 kya), and Sambungmacan and Ngandong (Solo) in Java (perhaps less than 250 kya). Fossils older than 1.7 million years are the remains of H. habilis and H. rudolfensis. These species are also known to be found from Olduvai Gorge and Koobi Fora in Africa, the oldest specimens being about 2.0 to 1.8 million years in age. On the other hand, there is a group of later specimens that show some features of H. erectus but are commonly regarded either as “archaic” representatives of Homo sapiens or as belonging to H. heidelbergensis; these include specimens from Europe (Mauer, Arago, Bilzingsleben, and petralona), northwestern Africa (Rabat and perhaps Salé and sīdī ʿabd al-raḥmān), eastern and southern Africa (Kabwe, Elandsfontein, Ndutu, Omo, and Bodo), and Asia (the Dali find of 1978). Anatomy of Homo erectus:

 The cranial capacity of H. erectus averages about 1000 cc and generally ranges between 750 and 1250 cc.  The size of the brain case of most of the specimens falls within the lower range of variation of modern Homo sapiens.  The cranial bones are thick with thick brow ridges which are continuous forming a distinct supra orbital torus.  There is a pronounced postorbital constriction.  The skull is low and relatively flat, or platycephalic and in some specimens especially, in Java man, there is a bony ridge, the found along the midline at the top of the brain case. The profile of the cranium as seen from the side clearly shows: The angularity of the occipital, above this is a horizontal bar of bone, the occipital torus. 7

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

 The greatest width of the skull is towards the bottom. The facial skeleton is comparatively large and broad as compared to that of modern H. sapiens.  The face, which is preserved in only a few specimens, is massively constructed, and its lower parts project forward.  The bone forming the wall of the nose is thinner and the nasal bridge is relatively high and prominent.  The teeth of H. erectus are smaller than the but larger than the H. sapiens. It is in accordance to the characteristics of the genus homo where teeth get reduced in size and number with time.  The dental arcade is diverging with the greatest width occurring between the third molars.  The mandible lacks chin, but does not have a mandibular torus.  Externally the erectus femur resembles that of the sapiens but x-rays reveal that the outer wall of the shaft of erectus femur is twice as thick as that of the sapien’s femur.  The presence of prominent linea aspera on the posterior side of the femur strongly suggests erect posture and bipedal locomotion for the H. erectus.

Peking man calotte

8

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Turkana boy

Cultural remains: More than 100,000 artifacts have been recovered from the Zhoukoudian sites that were occupied intermittently for almost 250,000 years. According to Wu and Lin, 1983, it is one of the sites with the longest history of habitation by man or his ancestors. The occupation of the site has been divided into three cultural stages: Earliest stage (460,000-420,000 years ago) the are large, close to a pound in weight and made of soft stone such as . Middle stage (370,000-350,000 years ago) tools become smaller and lighter (under a pound) and these smaller tools comprise approximately two-thirds of the sample. Final stage (300,000-230,000 years ago) tools are still small, and the materials are of better quality. The coarse quartz of the earlier periods is replaced by finer quartz, sandstone tools have almost disappeared and flint tools increase in frequency by as much as 30 percent. Expansion of the brain presumably enabled H. erectus to develop a more sophisticated tool kit than seen among earlier hominids. The important change in this tool kit was a core worked on both sides called bifaces (known widely as handaxe or ). The biface had a flatter core than the roundish earlier pebble tool. And probably even more important, this core tool was obviously a target design that is, the main goal of the tool maker. This greater focus and increased control enabled the 9

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

stoneknapper to produce straighter edges resulting in a more efficient implement. This acheulian became standardized as the basic homo erectus all-purpose tool for more than a million years. It served to cut, scrape, pound, dig, and served as the most useful tool that has been found in Africa, parts of Asia, and later in Western Europe. The early tools were crude and shapeless but become more refined over time. Common tools at the site are choppers and chopping tools, but retouched flakes were fashioned into scrapers, points, burins and awls.

Oldowan

10

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Acheulian handaxes. Source: anthromuseum.missouri.edu

Other aspects of culture Stone was not the only material used by H. erectus; these hominids also used bone and probably horn. Found in the were antler fragments which had been hacked into pieces. Antler bases might have served as hammers and the sharp tines as digging sticks. Also found in abundance were deer skulls lacking facial bones as as antlers were unearthed thus leaving only the brain cases intact. It can thus be inferred that they served as drinking bowls. The way of life of the H. erectus has traditionally been described as hunter- gatherers who killed deer and horses as well as other and gathered fruits, berries, and ostrich eggs. Fragments of charred ostrich eggshells, the abundant deposits of berry were unearthed in the cave, and the flourishing growth surrounding the cave all suggest that meat was supplemented by the gathering of herbs, wild fruits, tubers and eggs. Layers of ash in the suggest the use of fire and the presence of .

11

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Source: anthromuseum.missouri.edu

Scientists have unearthed more than 350 ancient tools in Konso, Ethiopia that were used by ' ancient ancestors. The tools, which span roughly 1 million years of evolution, show a gradual progression to more refined shaping. Homo erectus thus has been ascribed as the firsts in-

 Making and using tools  Making and using fire  First cave dwellers  First hunter-gatherers  First to use hides for  First to migrate out of Africa

12

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Source:http://www.nature.com/scitable/content/map-of-homo-erectus-fossil-localities-96680469

Dispersal of Homo erectus The dispersal of Homo erectus from Africa was influenced by climate, topography, water boundaries and access to food and other resources. Palaeo-environmental reconstructions are thus of crucial importance in understanding the expansion of Homo erectus to so many parts of the old world. The long temporal span of Homo erectus begins very early in the pleistocene and extends to fairly late in that geological epoch. To comprehend the world of Homo erectus we must understand how environments shifted during pleistocene. The pleistocene which lasted more than 1.75 million years was a significant period in hominid evolutionary history and encompassed the appearance and disappearance of Homo erectus. The life of the hunter- was nomadic and the woodland and savannah that covered the southern tier of Asia would have been an excellent environment for H. erectus. As the population grew, small groups budded off and moved on to find their own resource areas. This process repeated again and again led by Homo erectus out of the African continent to travel east to as far as Java as well as to the west to Europe.

13

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Source: the guardian, uk edition The five Homo erectus skulls found in Dmanisi, Georgia. Photograph: Ponce De León, Zollikofe/university of Zurich Behavioral inferences: At Zhoukoudian the remains of H. erectus were found in cave and fissure deposits. Although this does not prove that these hominids were habitual cave dwellers, the additional evidence of associated remains—such as stone, charred animal bones, collections of seeds, and what could be ancient hearths and charcoal—all points to H. erectus as having spent periods of time in the grottoes of Zhoukoudian. On the other hand, the remains of Lantian, Trinil, Sangiran, and Mojokerto, as well as Tighennif, Olduvai, and Koobi Fora, were all found in open sites, sometimes in stream gravels and clays, sometimes in river , and sometimes in beds. These suggest that H. erectus also lived in open encampments along the banks of streams or on the shores of and also that proximity to water was crucial to survival. There is little doubt that mastery of fire was an important factor in colonizing cooler regions. Indeed, this discovery may have sped the migrations of ancient humans into the chilly, often glaciated expanses of . Sooner or later humans started their food, thus reducing the work demanded of their teeth. This in turn may have played an important part in minimizing the evolutionary advantage of big teeth, since cooked food needs far less cutting, tearing, and grinding than does raw food. Nevertheless, burned bones are present, and these relics may still speak to the ability of the Zhoukoudian inhabitants to roast meat.

14

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Other signs of the culture of H. erectus are implements found in the same deposits as their bones. Chopping tools and flakes made from split pebbles characterize both the Zhoukoudian and Dmanisi deposits; both are members of a so-called chopper chopping-tool family of industries. At Tighennif in northwestern Africa, H. erectus was found in association with totally different kinds of stone implements; these comprised double-edged hand and scrapers that have been characterized as representing what archaeologists call an early acheulian . This is part of the great acheulian hand- industrial complex, remnants of which are found widely spread over large parts of Europe and Africa. An acheulian industry is known also to emerge from Olduvai Gorge, is also known as the Oldowan industry.

There is no sign that they buried their dead: no complete burials have been found, nor have graves, , or red ochre (a mineral used as a paint by later forms of hominins), either on or around any bones.

Phylogenetic / evolutionary relationships A few researchers have generally opposed the view that H. erectus was the direct ancestor of later species, including homo-sapiens. argued energetically that H. erectus populations, particularly in Africa, overlap in time with more advanced homo sapiens and therefore cannot be ancestral to the latter. Some support for Leakey’s point of view has come from analysis of anatomic characteristics exhibited by the fossils. By emphasizing a distinction between “primitive” and “derived” traits in the reconstruction of relationships between species, several paleontologists have attempted to show that h. Erectus does not make a suitable morphological ancestor for Homo sapiens. Because the braincase is long, low, and thick-walled and presents a strong , and they claim that H. erectus shows derived (or specialized) characteristics not shared with more modern humans. At the same time, it is noted, Homo sapiens does share some features, including a rounded, lightly built cranium, with earlier hominins such as H. habilis. For these reasons, some paleontologists (including Leakey) consider The more slender, or “gracile” H. habilis and H. rudolfensis to be more closely related to Homo sapiens than is H. erectus. If this much is agreed, there is still uncertainty as to how and where H. erectus eventually gave rise to Homo sapiens. Several general hypotheses have been advanced, but there is still no firm consensus regarding models of gradual change as opposed to scenarios of rapid evolution in which change in one region is followed by migration of the new populations into other areas.

15

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus

Theories of gradual change A traditional view held by some palaeontologists is that a species may be transformed gradually into a succeeding species. Such successive species in the evolutionary sequence are called chronospecies. The boundaries between chronospecies are almost impossible to determine by means of any objective anatomic or functional criteria; thus, all that is left is the guesswork of drawing a boundary at a moment in time. Such a chronological boundary may have to be drawn arbitrarily between the last survivors of H. erectus and the earliest members of a succeeding species (e.g., Homo sapiens).

Theories of punctuated change A gradual transition FROM H. erectus to Homo sapiens is one interpretation of the fossil record, but the evidence also can be read differently. Many researchers have come to accept what can be termed a punctuated view of . This view suggests that species such as H. erectus may have exhibited little or no morphological change over long periods of time (evolutionary stasis) and that the transition from one species to a descendant form may have occurred relatively rapidly and in a restricted geographic area rather than on a worldwide basis. Whether any homo species, including our own, evolved gradually or rapidly has not yet been settled.

16

Physical/ Biological Anthropology Anthropology Homo erectus