DOCSLIB.ORG

Paranthropus Through the Looking Glass COMMENTARY Bernard A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paranthropus Through the Looking Glass COMMENTARY Bernard A COMMENTARY Paranthropus through the looking glass COMMENTARY Bernard A. Wooda,1 and David B. Pattersona,b Most research and public interest in human origins upper jaw fragment from Malema in Malawi is the focuses on taxa that are likely to be our ancestors. southernmost evidence. However, most of what we There must have been genetic continuity between know about P. boisei comes from fossils from Koobi modern humans and the common ancestor we share Fora on the eastern shore of Lake Turkana (4) and from with chimpanzees and bonobos, and we want to know sites in the Nachukui Formation on the western side of what each link in this chain looked like and how it be- the lake (Fig. 1A). haved. However, the clear evidence for taxic diversity The cranial and dental morphology of P.boisei is so in the human (aka hominin) clade means that we also distinctive its remains are relatively easy to identify (5). have close relatives who are not our ancestors (1). Two Unique features include its flat, wide, and deep face, papers in PNAS focus on the behavior and paleoenvi- flexed cranial base, large and thick lower jaw, and ronmental context of Paranthropus boisei, a distinctive small incisors and canines combined with massive and long-extinct nonancestral relative that lived along- chewing teeth. The surface area available for process- side our early Homo ancestors in eastern Africa between ing food is extended both forward—by having premo- just less than 3 Ma and just over 1 Ma. Both papers use lar teeth that look like molars—and backward—by the stable isotopes to track diet during a largely unknown, unusually large third molar tooth crowns, all of which but likely crucial, period in our evolutionary history. are capped by exceptionally thick and fast-forming The first fossil evidence of P. boisei, two upper milk dental enamel (6). Other early hominins, such as Para- teeth, a very large molar, and a tiny canine, was dis- nthropus robustus from southern Africa, have similar- covered in 1955 at Olduvai Gorge, in Tanzania (2). The looking crania, large postcanine teeth, and thick enamel, mystery of the owner of the unusual teeth was solved but the crania of P. b o i s e i are distinctive, its postcanine in 1959 when Mary Leakey recognized fragments of a teeth are exceptionally large, and the enamel covering fossil hominin cranium eroding from a hillside. The them is exceptionally thick. The foramen magnum— Olduvai Hominid (OH) 5 cranium had a small (ca. where the brain connects with the spinal cord on the 500 cm3) brain—not much bigger than that of a gorilla underside of the cranium—is situated almost as far for- and about a third the size of that of a modern human— ward as it is in modern humans, suggesting that P. b o i s e i a flat and broad face, large attachment areas for was capable of walking erect on its hind legs. chewing muscles, small incisors and canines, and ex- ceptionally large premolar and molar tooth crowns. A Dietary Puzzle Louis Leakey proposed a new taxon, Zinjanthropus Why would a hominin need flared cheek bones, a boisei (3) for OH 5, but within a few years the new large mandible, bony sagittal crests, and massive genus was dropped in favor of Australopithecus,or chewing teeth? Several lines of evidence suggest that Paranthropus; the latter is our preference. More evi- P. boisei acquired its distinctive morphology within an dence of P. boisei came in 1964 with the discovery at ecosystem that was trending toward cooler, drier, and Peninj, just north of Olduvai Gorge, of a large lower more open conditions, which in turn led to an increase jaw with the same unusual relative tooth size relation- in C4 vegetation on the landscape (Fig. 1B and ref. 7). ships seen in OH 5. In addition to the evidence from Stable isotope data extracted from the enamel of Olduvai, cranial and mandibular, but mostly dental, post-2-Ma P. boisei fossils from Koobi Fora are con- remains assigned to P. boisei have been recovered sistent with a diet dominated by C4 foods (Fig. 1 C and from sites in Kenya and Ethiopia. Konso in Ethiopia D and ref. 8), whereas contemporary evidence of the is the furthest north the taxon is recorded, and an genus Homo from Koobi Fora (i.e., Homo habilis and aCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052; and bDepartment of Biology, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA 30597 Author contributions: B.A.W. and D.B.P. wrote the paper. The authors declare no competing interest. Published under the PNAS license. See companion articles, “Dietary trends in herbivores from the Shungura Formation, southwestern Ethiopia,” 10.1073/pnas.2006982117 and “Isotopic evidence for the timing of the dietary shift toward C4 foods in eastern African Paranthropus,” 10.1073/pnas.2006221117. 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2016445117 PNAS Latest Articles | 1of3 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 A B Lower Omo Valley Konso Nachukui C Koobi Fora Chesowanja Peninj Laetoli Olduvai Beds I & II 250 km N Malema D E Fig. 1. Eastern African context of Paranthropus in the LOV. (A) Spatial distribution of Paranthropus-bearing localities in eastern Africa. (B) Vegetation change in eastern Africa over the past 5 My as indicated by fraction woody cover estimates. (C) New LOV hominin δ13C values within the context of existing eastern African hominin data. (D) New LOV hominin δ13C values in the context of existing Turkana Basin hominin values. (E) Summary of change points in new LOV faunal δ13C values. Homo rudolfensis)hasamoreC3 signal (9). Most C4 biomass in the jaw and a shin bone from Laetoli in Tanzania (Fig. 1A), has been tropics are grasses, and the chewing-dominated dentition of P. b o i s e i dated to ca.2.66Ma. would have enabled it to process grass, or sedges, which given the In PNAS, Wynn et al. (15) exploit evidence from the Lower Omo – strength of the C4 signal may have been their staple diet (10, 11). Valley (LOV) to explore the dietary ecology of the P. a e t h i o p i c u s However, the same morphology would have also allowed P. b o i s e i to P. b o i s e i lineage, and Negash et al. (16) provide a comparative con- process nuts and hard-shelled seeds. These could have been either text for these changes by tracking the dietary ecology of the broader additionstotheirnormaldietorthey could have been fallback foods herbivore community in the LOV between 3.5 and 2.0 Ma. The LOV, that would have kept them going until they could return to eating which is one of the few locations in eastern Africa where there is a their preferred food (12). The distinctive craniodental morphology of more-or-less-continuous sedimentary record of this period of human P. b o i s e i appears as a package that undergoes little change over the evolutionary history, has been subjected to the type of careful sys- course of a million years (13). Whatever niche P. b o i s e i occupied, that tematic geological (17) and paleontological (18, 19) analysis that niche and P. b o i s e i ’s adaptive response to it were remarkably dura- provides the necessary context for investigating what preceded the ble. The exception to this morphological conservatism concerns prolonged period of P. b o i s e i stasis that is recorded in younger sedi- fossils older than 2.3 Ma (14) from two locations—the Shungura ments at sites around Lake Turkana. Both studies use a method called Formation in the Lower Omo Valley of Ethiopia and west of Lake change point detection to search for shifts in stable isotope values. Turkana. The best-known of these fossils are a 2.6-My-old lower jaw Stable isotope analysis is destructive, but over the years sampling and found in Ethiopia and a ca. 2.5-My-old cranium recovered from the analytical techniques have been refined in ways that reduce the west of Lake Turkana. Many, but not all, researchers put them in a damage to the fossils, while at the same time increasing precision separate species, Paranthropus aethiopicus. Unfortunately, no tooth (20). Thankfully, these developments, and the potential implications crowns were preserved in either the lower jaw or the cranium, but the of any results, persuaded the curators responsible for these col- space occupied by the roots of the postcanine teeth suggests that lections that these minimally destructive analyses were justified. the crowns of the premolars and molars must have been similar in size to those of P. b o i s e i .ComparedwithP. b o i s e i , P. a e t h i o p i c u s has a Tracking Diets through Time more projecting face, a more ape-like (i.e., less flexed) cranial base, Wynn et al. (15) document an isotopic transition in P. aethiopicus larger incisors and canines, and simpler premolar crowns and roots. that apparently precedes the morphological transition between The earliest probable evidence for P. a e t h i o p i c u s , a piece of upper P. aethiopicus and P. boisei (Fig. 1 C and D). Stable isotopic data 2of3 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2016445117 Wood and Patterson Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 collected from enamel record the types of foods an organism was sampled in the LOV, something that is also seen at other sites in consuming when that particular tooth was forming.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologists Probe Hominid Environments
    1999 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Geologists Probe Hominid Environments Gail M. Ashley, Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT challenging areas of research often lie at artificially imposed disci- pline boundaries. Here lies the potential for synergy and perhaps The study of an early Pleistocene “time slice” in Olduvai even the generation of a new science (Fig. 2). However, integrat- Gorge, Tanzania, provides a successful example of a recon- ing sciences is not as easy as it might first appear. It requires peo- structed paleolandscape that is rich in detail and adds a small ple to learn language, theories, methodologies, and a bit about piece to the puzzle of hominid evolution in Africa. The recon- the “culture” of the other science and to continually walk in the struction required multidisciplinary interaction of sedimen- other person’s shoes. Simply having lots of scientists with differ- tologists, paleoanthropologists, paleoecologists, and geochro- ent backgrounds working in parallel on the same project doesn’t nologists. Geology plays an increasingly important role in produce the same end result as integrative science. unraveling the record of hominid evolution. Key questions This paper describes a study at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania (Fig. regarding paleoclimate, paleoenvironment, and perhaps even 3), using a relatively new approach, landscape paleoanthropol- hominid land use are answered by geology, and these answers ogy, that attempts to interpret the landscape during a geologic provide a basis for multidisciplinary work. Landscape pale- instant in time. The project is the Olduvai Landscape Paleo- oanthropology integrates these data from several disciplines anthropology Project (OLAPP), involving a multidisciplinary to interpret the ecological context of hominids during a nar- team.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Origin of Low Trabecular Bone Density in Modern Humans
    Recent origin of low trabecular bone density in modern humans Habiba Chirchira,b,1, Tracy L. Kivellc,d, Christopher B. Ruffe, Jean-Jacques Hublind, Kristian J. Carlsonf,g, Bernhard Zipfelf, and Brian G. Richmonda,b,h,1 aCenter for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052; bHuman Origins Program, Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560; cAnimal Postcranial Evolution Laboratory, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom; dDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; eCenter for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; fEvolutionary Studies Institute, The University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein 2000 Johannesburg, South Africa; gDepartment of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; and hDivision of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024 Edited by Erik Trinkaus, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, and approved November 26, 2014 (received for review June 23, 2014) Humans are unique, compared with our closest living relatives humans relative to earlier hominins generally has been attributed (chimpanzees) and early fossil hominins, in having an enlarged to a decrease in daily physical activity via technological and body size and lower limb joint surfaces in combination with a rel- cultural innovations (6, 10, 13–15, 19–22). atively gracile skeleton (i.e., lower bone mass for our body size). There also is evidence that increased activity level and me- Some analyses have observed that in at least a few anatomical chanical loading increases trabecular bone mineral density within regions modern humans today appear to have relatively low tra- limb bones (ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Habilis
    COMMENT SUSTAINABILITY Citizens and POLICY End the bureaucracy THEATRE Shakespeare’s ENVIRONMENT James Lovelock businesses must track that is holding back science world was steeped in on surprisingly optimistic governments’ progress p.33 in India p.36 practical discovery p.39 form p.41 The foot of the apeman that palaeo­ ‘handy man’, anthropologists had been Homo habilis. recovering in southern Africa since the 1920s. This, the thinking went, was replaced by the taller, larger-brained Homo erectus from Asia, which spread to Europe and evolved into Nean­ derthals, which evolved into Homo sapiens. But what lay between the australopiths and H. erectus, the first known human? BETTING ON AFRICA Until the 1960s, H. erectus had been found only in Asia. But when primitive stone-chop­ LIBRARY PICTURE EVANS MUSEUM/MARY HISTORY NATURAL ping tools were uncovered at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, Leakey became convinced that this is where he would find the earliest stone- tool makers, who he assumed would belong to our genus. Maybe, like the australopiths, our human ancestors also originated in Africa. In 1931, Leakey began intensive prospect­ ing and excavation at Olduvai Gorge, 33 years before he announced the new human species. Now tourists travel to Olduvai on paved roads in air-conditioned buses; in the 1930s in the rainy season, the journey from Nairobi could take weeks. The ravines at Olduvai offered unparalleled access to ancient strata, but field­ work was no picnic in the park. Water was often scarce. Leakey and his team had to learn to share Olduvai with all of the wild animals that lived there, lions included.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Erectus Infancy and Childhood the Turning Point in the Evolution of Behavioral Development in Hominids
    10 Homo erectus Infancy and Childhood The Turning Point in the Evolution of Behavioral Development in Hominids Sue Taylor Parker In man, attachment is mediated by several different sorts of behaviour of which the most obvious are crying and calling, babbling and smiling, clinging, non-nutritional sucking, and locomotion as used in approach, following and seeking. —John Bowlby, Attachment The evolution of hominid behavioral ontogeny can be recon - structed using two lines of evidence: first, comparative neontological data on the behavior and development of living hominoid species (humans and the great apes), and second, comparative paleontolog- ical and archaeological evidence associated with fossil hominids. (Although behavior rarely fossilizes, it can leave significant traces.) 1 In this chapter I focus on paleontological and neontological evi - dence relevant to modeling the evolution of the following hominid adaptations: (1) bipedal locomotion and stance; (2) tool use and tool making; (3) subsistence patterns; (4) growth and development and other life history patterns; (5) childbirth; (6) childhood and child care; and (7) cognition and cognitive development. In each case I present a cladistic model for the origins of the characters in question. 2 Specifically, I review pertinent data on the following widely recog - nized hominid genera and species: Australopithecus species (A. afarensis , A. africanus , and A. robustus [Paranthropus robustus]) , early Homo species (Australopithecus gahri , Homo habilis , and Homo rudolfensis) , and Middle Pleistocene Homo species (Homo erectus , Homo ergaster , and others), which I am calling erectines . Copyrighted Material www.sarpress.org 279 S UE TAYLOR PARKER Table 10.1 Estimated Body Weights and Geological Ages of Fossil Hominids _______________________________________________________________________ Species Geologic Age Male Weight Female Weight (MYA) (kg) (kg) _______________________________________________________________________ A.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar on the Evolution of Language PSYC GU4242 4 Points Professor Herb Terrace 418 Schermerhorn Hall [email protected]
    Seminar on the Evolution of Language PSYC GU4242 4 points Professor Herb Terrace 418 Schermerhorn Hall [email protected] 212-854-4544 Thursdays 10:10-12 Schermerhorn 200C Office hours: Thursdays 9-10am and other times TBA Course description: This seminar will consider the evolution of language at the levels of the word and grammar, in each instance, phylogenetically and ontogenetically. Since humans are the only species that use language, attention will be paid to how language differs from animal communication. Prerequisites: Introduction to linguistics, introduction to psychology, and permission of instructor. Role of PSYC GU4242 in the Psychology curriculum: GU4242 is a seminar open to graduate students and advanced undergraduate students. It fulfills the following degree requirements. • For graduate students, it can partially fulfill the seminar requirement for the M.A. or the elective requirement for the M.Phil. • For undergraduates Psychology majors or concentrators and for students in the Psychology Postbaccalaureate certificate program, it meets the Group I (Perception & Cognition) distribution requirement. • For Psychology majors and Psychology Postbac students, it fulfills the seminar requirement. • For undergraduates pursuing the Neuroscience & Behavior major, it fulfills the advanced seminar requirement in the Psychology portion of the major. • Graduate students in Psychology and junior and senior Neuroscience & Behavior, Psychology, and Linguistics majors will have priority for registration. However, for non-majors in the College and in G.S., GU4242 could count as one term of the natural science requirement, provided the student has taken the prerequisite courses and has instructor permission. Role of PSYC GU4242 in the Linguistics curriculum: This course can be used to meet the “psychology and biology of language” theme requirement or the elective course requirement for the Linguistics major.
    [Show full text]
  • Paranthropus Boisei: Fifty Years of Evidence and Analysis Bernard A
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Biological Sciences Faculty Research Biological Sciences Fall 11-28-2007 Paranthropus boisei: Fifty Years of Evidence and Analysis Bernard A. Wood George Washington University Paul J. Constantino Biological Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/bio_sciences_faculty Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Wood B and Constantino P. Paranthropus boisei: Fifty years of evidence and analysis. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 50:106-132. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 50:106–132 (2007) Paranthropus boisei: Fifty Years of Evidence and Analysis Bernard Wood* and Paul Constantino Center for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052 KEY WORDS Paranthropus; boisei; aethiopicus; human evolution; Africa ABSTRACT Paranthropus boisei is a hominin taxon ers can trace the evolution of metric and nonmetric var- with a distinctive cranial and dental morphology. Its iables across hundreds of thousands of years. This pa- hypodigm has been recovered from sites with good per is a detailed1 review of half a century’s worth of fos- stratigraphic and chronological control, and for some sil evidence and analysis of P. boi se i and traces how morphological regions, such as the mandible and the both its evolutionary history and our understanding of mandibular dentition, the samples are not only rela- its evolutionary history have evolved during the past tively well dated, but they are, by paleontological 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity of Newly Found, Fully Intact Hominid Skulls from Ethiopia Chris Lemke College of Dupage
    ESSAI Volume 7 Article 31 4-1-2010 Identity of Newly Found, Fully Intact Hominid Skulls from Ethiopia Chris Lemke College of DuPage Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai Recommended Citation Lemke, Chris (2009) "Identity of Newly Found, Fully Intact Hominid Skulls from Ethiopia," ESSAI: Vol. 7, Article 31. Available at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol7/iss1/31 This Selection is brought to you for free and open access by the College Publications at [email protected].. It has been accepted for inclusion in ESSAI by an authorized administrator of [email protected].. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lemke: Identity of Hominid Skulls Identity of Newly Found, Fully Intact Hominid Skulls from Ethiopia by Chris Lemke (Honors Biology 1151) ABSTRACT ecently, three fully intact hominid skulls have been found in the Afar Region of Ethiopia. Objectives were to date the skulls using Uranium-235, and to identify each of the skulls. RUranium-235 dating indicated skulls A and B to be 2.9 million years old, and skull C to be 1.7 million years old. Each skull was properly identified using existing fossil data. The two oldest skulls were found to be Australopithecus afarensis, and A. africanus. The younger skull was identified as Homo habilis. A discrepancy was found in the measured cranial capacity data against existing data. Due to condition of the newly found fossils, the most likely explanation for the discrepancy is inaccuracy of existing fossil data due to incomplete and fragmented specimens, or that the skulls in question were representative of a juvenile hominid.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the BEGINNING C 25 Million BC 3.6 Million BC 10,000–3000 BC
    © Lonely Planet Publications 19 History Natalie Folster IN THE BEGINNING About 3.6 million years ago, a party of two or three trekked across the plain at Laetoli near Olduvai Gorge ( p226 ) in northern Tanzania, leaving their foot- prints in a blanket of volcanic ash. The prints were still there when archae- DNA lineages found in ologist Mary Leakey uncovered them in 1978. She pegged them as the steps Tanzania are among of our earliest known ancestors – hominids known as Australopithecines, the oldest anywhere on whose remains have been found only in East Africa. Earth, making the coun- About two million years ago, the human family tree split, giving rise to try a strong contender for homo habilis, a meat-eating creature with a larger brain who used crude distinction as the ‘cradle stone tools, the remains of whom have been found around Olduvai Gorge. of humanity’. By 1.8 million years ago, homo erectus had evolved, leaving bones and axes for archaeologists to find at ancient lakeside sites throughout East Africa and around the world. What is today Tanzania was peopled by waves of migration. Rock paint- ings dating back 10,000 years have been found around Kondoa ( p236 ). These are believed to have been made by clans of nomadic hunter-gatherers who The first travel guide spoke a language similar to that of southern Africa’s Khoisan. Between 3000 to the Tanzanian coast and 5000 years ago, they were joined by small bands of Cushitic-speaking was the Periplus of the farmers and cattle-herders moving down from what is today Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Members of the Genus Homo -. EXPLORATIONS: an OPEN INVITATION to BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
    EXPLORATIONS: AN OPEN INVITATION TO BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY Editors: Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera and Lara Braff American Anthropological Association Arlington, VA 2019 Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. ISBN – 978-1-931303-63-7 www.explorations.americananthro.org 10. Early Members of the Genus Homo Bonnie Yoshida-Levine Ph.D., Grossmont College Learning Objectives • Describe how early Pleistocene climate change influenced the evolution of the genus Homo. • Identify the characteristics that define the genus Homo. • Describe the skeletal anatomy of Homo habilis and Homo erectus based on the fossil evidence. • Assess opposing points of view about how early Homo should be classified. Describe what is known about the adaptive strategies of early members of the Homo genus, including tool technologies, diet, migration patterns, and other behavioral trends.The boy was no older than 9 when he perished by the swampy shores of the lake. After death, his slender, long-limbed body sank into the mud of the lake shallows. His bones fossilized and lay undisturbed for 1.5 million years. In the 1980s, fossil hunter Kimoya Kimeu, working on the western shore of Lake Turkana, Kenya, glimpsed a dark colored piece of bone eroding in a hillside. This small skull fragment led to the discovery of what is arguably the world’s most complete early hominin fossil—a youth identified as a member of the species Homo erectus. Now known as Nariokotome Boy, after the nearby lake village, the skeleton has provided a wealth of information about the early evolution of our own genus, Homo (see Figure 10.1).
    [Show full text]
  • BIO1300 Human Evolution
    The Human Animal The Human Timescale 1 2 BIO 1300: The Human Animal BIO 1300: The Human Animal Geological Timescale Species Millions of Years ● A population or Periods group of populations Permian Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous Tertiary Quat. Major events that are capable of interbreeding and that can produce Dinosaurs Development and Human viable and fertile Evolve and Expand Diversification of Evolution Start of Abundance of Flowering Age of offspring Age of Large Herbivore Plants Mammals Dinosaurs Reptiles Mule 3 4 BIO 1300: The Human Animal BIO 1300: The Human Animal Primate Evolution Primate Ancestor ● Pen-tailed tree shrew ● Ecologically similar New World Old World Lemurs Pottos monkeys monkeys Gibbons Orangutans Gorillas Chimpanzees Humans to squirrels 6 million years ago ● Tree-dwellers among branches ● Eats fruit and insects Ptilocercus at least 65 million years ago Ancestral arboreal insectivore 5 6 BIO 1300: The Human Animal BIO 1300: The Human Animal 1 Primate Phylogeny Primate Evolution Hominids ● Primates : Hominoids – Primitive, smaller bodies and brains: Prosimians • Lemurs and Tarsiers – Large bodies and brains: Anthropoids Simians/Anthropoids Prosimians 7 8 BIO 1300: The Human Animal BIO 1300: The Human Animal Prosimians and Monkeys Marmosets Tamarins Capuchins Family Howler Spider Hominidae: The Great Guenon Macaque Apes Baboon Mandrill Langur Proboscis 9 10 BIO 1300: The Human Animal BIO 1300: The Human Animal Humans Our Common Ancestor ● Probably had many traits in common with modern Chimps and Bonobos – Diet of fruit
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania.Pdf
    FEATURE Tanzania field school Shaping Students and Communities in Tanzania ummer 2007: 13 students and And, of high importance to students, it costs going way back to when I was an undergrad.” two professors from UC Denver much less than most other field schools. Musiba also reached out to universities are awakened in the middle of All of those benefits and partnerships are around the globe, including the University S the night by noises normally only the result of Musiba’s relationships with locals, of Kyoto in Japan and the Bugando University heard in a zoo. Although many lie awake in his passion for the country and his drive to College of Health Sciences in Mwanza, Tanzania. their tents, one among them sleeps peacefully. create global citizens of his students. “When I talk to people at anthropology Charles Musiba, assistant professor of meetings and tell them that our field school only anthropology, was born in Tanzania, Africa, In the Beginning costs about $4,500, I tell them that it’s because and now directs UCD’s Tanzania Field School. “I was myself a graduate student and saw that we do a lot of cost sharing with these partners.” He’s been taking I could become a bridge to Tanzania and help students to his my fellow graduate students gain access to new country for 11 years. areas for their research,” says Musiba. “But The field most existing field schools in Africa are very school is located expensive. Those run at schools like Rutgers, in the Ngorongoro Harvard and Yale cost between $6,000 to Conservation Area $7,000 just for tuition, not counting airfare.” in northern Tanzania Musiba began collaborating with people he and, according to all knew in Tanzania, and they smoothed out a accounts, it offers normally difficult process.
    [Show full text]
  • Australopiths Wading? Homo Diving?
    Symposium: Water and Human Evolution, April 30th 1999, University Gent, Flanders, Belgium Proceedings Australopiths wading? Homo diving? http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/Symposium.html http://www.flash.net/~hydra9/marcaat.html Marc Verhaegen & Stephen Munro – 23 July 1999 Abstract Asian pongids (orangutans) and African hominids (gorillas, chimpanzees and humans) split 14-10 million years ago, possibly in the Middle East, or elsewhere in Eurasia, where the great ape fossils of 12-8 million years ago display pongid and/or hominid features. In any case, it is likely that the ancestors of the African apes, australopithecines and humans, lived on the Arabian-African continent 8-6 million years ago, when they split into gorillas and humans-chimpanzees. They could have frequently waded bipedally, like mangrove proboscis monkeys, in the mangrove forests between Eurasia and Africa, and partly fed on hard-shelled fruits and oysters like mangrove capuchin monkeys: thick enamel plus stone tool use is typically seen in capuchins, hominids and sea otters. The australopithecines might have entered the African inland along rivers and lakes. Their dentition suggests they ate mostly fruits, hard grass-like plants, and aquatic herbaceous vegetation (AHV). The fossil data indicates that the early australopithecines of 4-3 million years ago lived in waterside forests or woodlands; and their larger, robust relatives of 2-1 million years ago in generally more open milieus near marshes and reedbeds, where they could have waded bipedally. Some anthropologists believe the present-day African apes evolved from australopithecine-like ancestors, which would imply that knuckle-walking gorillas and chimpanzees evolved in parallel from wading- climbing ‘aquarborealists’.
    [Show full text]