Slavery and Wage Labour: Freedom and Its Doubles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Slavery and Wage Labour: Freedom and Its Doubles 3 Slavery and Wage Labour: Freedom and Its Doubles In a 2012 TEDx talk titled ‘Photos that bear witness to modern slav- ery’, a photographer talks us through what the publicity blurb describes as her ‘hauntingly beautiful images ...illuminating the plight of the 27 million souls enslaved worldwide’. Lisa Kristine, a slim, young white American woman, with neat blonde hair and a startlingly white shirt, stands spotlit on a stage. Behind her, images of impoverished develop- ing world black and brown men, women and children are projected onto a huge screen. As the photographs appear, Lisa recounts the story of her work with Free the Slaves. It was, she tells us in a voice husky with sup- pressed emotion, a journey into ‘Dante’s inferno’, a hidden world where ‘modern slaves’ are forced to labour with ‘primitive tools’ in unbearable heat (Kristine, 2012). On her journey, she met people engaged in brick production and stone quarrying in India and Nepal, brothel prostitution in Nepal, silk dyeing in India and informal gold mining in Ghana. In the Himalayas, Kristine tells us, she found and photographed ‘children carrying stone for miles down mountainous terrain to trucks waiting below. The sheets of stone weighed more than the children’ (Kristine, 2012). They, like other workers she met, were not paid for their backbreaking work, but many did not even realize they were slaves ‘because they’ve been slaves all their lives’ and knew no differ- ent. But, she continues, one group of villagers did attempt to resist their exploitation. In response, the ‘slavers’ burned down their homes, and the villagers ‘were so petrified they wanted to give up’. Yet one woman: rallied for them to persevere and abolitionists on the ground helped them get a quarry lease of their own. So that now they do the same backbreaking work, but they do it for themselves, and they get paid forit,andtheydoitinfreedom. (Kristine, 2012) 55 J. O. Davidson, Modern Slavery © Julia O’Connell Davidson 2015 56 Modern Slavery It seems likely that she is referring to a case that is presented by Free the Slaves as a success story, in which ‘hereditary slaves in a stone quarry’ in northern India were helped ‘to stand up to their masters and renounce slavery’ and subsequently ‘embarked on new lives, many of them now running their own quarry. The children went to school and some ex-slaves even ran for elected office’ (Bales, 2007a; FTS, 2014b). I do not doubt that these villagers were in an extremely oppressive situation, or that they managed to improve that situation in certain respects through their collective action. But I do wonder what it is that leads organizations like Free the Slaves and Walk Free to describe such workers as ‘modern slaves’, and what kind of freedom they wish to bestow upon them. Take artisanal gold mining and stone quarrying work, for example, both generally classified under the broad heading of ‘Artisanal and Small Mining’ or ASM. The term refers to ‘informal mining activities carried out using low technology or with minimal machinery’ (Fraser Institute, 2012). Definitional problems, the absence of reliable and cross-nationally comparable official statistics, and the fact that workers are often involved on a seasonal and occasional basis mean that all statistics on it should be treated with caution. However, it is estimated that, in the developing world, there are ‘at least 25 million artisanal miners, with 150–170 million people indirectly reliant on ASM’ (Fraser Institute, 2012). The employment relations associated with ASM vary widely, not merely between different countries and regions, but also within them, and even within a single mine. In Ghana, for instance, labourers in artisanal gold mining may be working on a seasonal or more perma- nent basis, with seasonal workers often having migrated from poorer rural regions in the north; they may be hired by the day or work- ing on a self-employed, entrepreneurial basis (Okyere, 2012). In South Asia, ASM includes workers on permanent and casual employment con- tracts (though not usually written contracts), self-employed producers, dependent producers, unpaid family members and bonded labourers. Many workers are indebted, in some cases leading to forms of bondage transferrable between family members, or generationally, and the vast majority are migrants from other regions of the same country (ILO, 2005; Lahiri-Dutt, 2006). As ‘internal migrants’, they are often unable to access basic entitlements to housing, health facilities, education and banking services, or to secure ‘social security and legal protection’ (UNICEF, 2014) and, in addition, such workers are in the main drawn from extremely poor and marginalized communities, Dalit (or Sched- uled Caste) or Adivasi (or Scheduled Tribes) (almost half of India’s Adivasi Slavery and Wage Labour: Freedom and Its Doubles 57 population of 84.3 million live below the official poverty line, Nilsen, 2012: 1). Whatever the nature of the employment relation, ASM workers in the developing world typically labour without proper equipment or safety gear and the conditions they face are notoriously harsh (Hilson et al., 2013; Okyere, 2012, 2013). Occupational hazards affecting all workers in ASM in South Asia (in other words, the ‘free’ as well as the bonded) include: respiratory problems, silicosis, tuberculosis, leukemia, arthritis, poor vision and deafness to reproductive tract problems. They occur due to constant exposure to dust and noise, poor water supply and sanita- tion. Whereas major accidents claim mostly the lives of men due to their preponderance in the underground jobs, minor accidents due to blasting or falls are also common for both women and men. Snake bites in conditions of inundation can also claim lives. (Lahiri-Dutt, 2006: 25) Workers generally earn either only enough for daily survival or too little to avoid becoming mired in debt. In many places, ‘Living and working conditions are deplorable; small and low temporary huts with plastic sheets for roofing, no clean and safe accessible drinking water supply, no electricity, no health services and no educational facilities for the children’ (Lahiri-Dutt, 2006: 30). Samuel Okyere’s ethnography of an artisanal gold mine in Ghana reveals similar living and working conditions (2012, 2013). The new abolitionists are not, of course, in favour of such hazardous and miserable conditions, or of inequality, poverty or caste/tribal dis- crimination. But they imagine these problems as separable from what they call ‘slavery’. More than this, the new abolitionists believe that end- ing ‘slavery’ and enabling workers like those Lisa Kristine photographed to ‘work in freedom’ is part of the solution to the problem of poverty and global inequality. What they dub ‘modern slavery’ is presented as an anachronism that can and will disappear when economic develop- ment and modernization is combined with proper anti-slavery law and law enforcement. As Kevin Bales (2010) puts it: Slavery has been pushed to the criminal edges of our global soci- ety and to the very edge of its own extinction ...freed slaves given opportunities today generate economic growth through a ‘freedom dividend’. 58 Modern Slavery Though workers liberated from bondage may not immediately enjoy a standard of living, working conditions or social protections compa- rable to that enjoyed by people like Kevin and Lisa themselves, they have been gifted the basic building blocks of ‘freedom’. Now they can participate in capitalism proper. Their freedom, carefully managed and mixed with good, honest toil, will ultimately pay dividends that will allow them to lift themselves and their descendants from poverty and deprivation, and help their countries to develop economically. Again, there are strong echoes of nineteenth century European thought. Gyan Prakash (1993: 134) describes a letter to the civil court authorities in Calcutta written in 1808 by a minor official of the East India Company, which denounced British tolerance of slavery in India, arguing that its abolition ‘would inspire progress and prosperity in the region’, and that ‘free labor would bring the benefits of a market econ- omy and promote population growth and industriousness’. The new abolitionists, it seems, rely on the same ‘transition narrative’ that has historically been deployed in liberal defences of various European colo- nial ventures (Chakrabarty, 1992), ‘a heavily ideological narrative’ in which history unfolds as progress from the ‘primitive’ to ‘civilised’ and from feudalism into capitalism, culminating with ‘the modern individual’ at the story’s end (Brace, 2004: 210). This chapter critically explores that narrative against the history of wage labour in liberal capitalist societies, then returns to consider what is masked, forgotten or glossed over in depictions of workers like those photographed by Lisa Kristine as ‘slaves’. ‘Freeing up’ wage labour In feudal European societies, material production and human reproduc- tion were visibly united. A person’s position at birth determined their role in the process of material production, and material production was arranged with a view to sustaining and reproducing the human rela- tions that characterized the society, as well as human life itself: ‘all of what we might now call “society” was understood in terms of kinship or kin-like bonds of loyalty or fealty on the model of the patriarchal household’ (Slater, 1998: 138). There was profound political inequality, but those at the top of the hierarchy had certain obligations to their dependants lower down the hierarchy, as well as rights in relation to them. According to the standard liberal account of the history of lib- eral societies, and also to orthodox sociological theory, the two cycles – production and reproduction – were wrenched apart in the transition Slavery and Wage Labour: Freedom and Its Doubles 59 to capitalism. Productive activity was no longer suborned to the imper- ative to preserve a society organized around kin-like bonds, and status hierarchies were gradually eliminated and replaced by contractual rela- tions between free and formally equal buyers and sellers of labour.
Recommended publications
  • Indigenous Peoples' Access to Decent Work and Social
    INTER-AGENCY SUPPORT GROUP ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ ISSUES THEMATIC PAPER towards the preparation of the 2014 World Conference on Indigenous Peoples INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ ACCESS TO DECENT WORK AND SOCIAL PROTECTION JUNE 2014 Thematic Paper on Indigenous Peoples’ Access to Decent Work and Social Protection The United Nations Inter-Agency Support Group (IASG) on Indigenous Issues aims to strengthen cooperation and coordination among UN agencies, funds, entities and programmes on indigenous peoples’ issues and to support the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. It also seeks to promote the effective participation of indigenous peoples in relevant international processes. At its annual meeting held in October 2013, the IASG decided to develop a set of collaborative thematic papers to serve as background information and analysis on key issues to contribute to the process and preparations for the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples. The preparation of each paper was led by one or more agencies with inputs from other IASG members. The papers do not present or represent formal, official UN policy positions. Rather, they reflect the collective efforts of the Inter-Agency Support Group to highlight selected key issues and to provide substantive materials to inform the Conference, with a view to contributing to the realization of the rights of indigenous peoples. *The chair of the IASG rotates annually amongst the participating agencies. The Support Group has been chaired by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) until the end of the 13th session of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues in May 2014. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is currently holding the chair of the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • How Inequality Defines Women's Work in Asia
    OXFAM ISSUE BRIEFING JUNE 2016 Factory workers step out of their shuttle bus as their shift ends. Hlaing Thar Yar Industrial Zone, Yangon, November 2015. Photo: Kaung Htet/Oxfam UNDERPAID AND UNDERVALUED: HOW INEQUALITY DEFINES WOMEN’S WORK IN ASIA Rising economic inequality across Asia is threatening poverty reduction and slowing down the fight against gender inequality. Although the region has experienced economic growth, the bottom 70 percent have seen their income share fall while the share for the top 10 percent has increased rapidly. Low wages and a lack of rights at work, particularly for women, are at the heart of this scandal. At the same time, women are subsidizing the economy with a disproportionate responsibility for unpaid care work. Achieving living wages and recognizing, redistributing and reducing unpaid care work could support both economic and gender equality in Asia and should be prioritized by both governments and businesses. www.oxfam.org 1 INTRODUCTION For women across Asia, access to decent work and a living wage represents a fundamental pathway out of poverty, and one of the best ways to counter the dangerous tide of growing economic inequality. Yet in recent decades, working people, in rich and poor countries alike, have received a smaller and smaller slice of the economic pie, while those who own capital have seen their assets grow disproportionately. Low wages for the majority of people, and particularly for women, are at the heart of this scandal. At the same time, women continue to carry out the majority of unpaid care and domestic work, which is essential to keep economies functioning but is unrecognized and undermined in policy making.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Privatization: Between Plan and Market
    CHINESE PRIVATIZATION: BETWEEN PLAN AND MARKET LAN CAO* I INTRODUCTION Since 1978, when China adopted its open-door policy and allowed its economy to be exposed to the international market, it has adhered to what Deng Xiaoping called "socialism with Chinese characteristics."1 As a result, it has produced an economy with one of the most rapid growth rates in the world by steadfastly embarking on a developmental strategy of gradual, market-oriented measures while simultaneously remaining nominally socialistic. As I discuss in this article, this strategy of reformthe mere adoption of a market economy while retaining a socialist ownership baseshould similarly be characterized as "privatization with Chinese characteristics,"2 even though it departs markedly from the more orthodox strategy most commonly associated with the term "privatization," at least as that term has been conventionally understood in the context of emerging market or transitional economies. The Russian experience of privatization, for example, represents the more dominant and more favored approach to privatizationcertainly from the point of view of the West and its advisersand is characterized by immediate privatization of the state sector, including the swift and unequivocal transfer of assets from the publicly owned state enterprises to private hands. On the other hand, "privatization with Chinese characteristics" emphasizes not the immediate privatization of the state sector but rather the retention of the state sector with the Copyright © 2001 by Lan Cao This article is also available at http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/63LCPCao. * Professor of Law, College of William and Mary Marshall-Wythe School of Law. At the time the article was written, the author was Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx, the Present Crisis and the Future of Labour*
    MARX, THE PRESENT CRISIS AND THE FUTURE OF LABOUR* Ernest Mandel For several years, the political thesis that human emancipation can no longer rely on the 'proletariat', the class of wage labour, has been increasingly buttressed by economic arguments. Some posit that wage labour is receding rapidly from its position as the main sector of the active population, as the result of automation, robotisation, mass unemployment, growth of small independent business firms, etc. (Gorz, Dahrendorf, Daniel Bell, Hobsbawm).' Others state that there is no future for mankind (and therefore for human emancipation) as long as 'classical' industrial techno- logy and thence 'classical' wage labour are maintained at their present level because such a situation would lead to a complete destruction of the ecological balance (Ilitch, Bahro, G~rz).~The present crisis is therefore seen not as a typical crisis of overproduction and overaccumulation. It is seen as a fundamental change of structure of the international capitalist economy, with a long-term fundamental shift in the weight, cohesion and dynamic of wage labour, at the expense of that class, as a 'crisis of the industrial system'. Can this hypothesis be verified empirically? If not, what is the meaning and what are the long-term potential consequences of growing structural unemployment, which, in and by itself, is an undeniable phenomenon? If yes, what is the explanation of the phenomenon of the supposed 'decline of the working class' as an objective phenomenon? What are its potential economic consequences? Empirically, the basic trend which is statistically verifiable is that of the growth of wage labour on a world scale, and on all continents, and not that of its absolute or relative decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Choice: Substance Depends Upon Process
    Rural Development, Privatization and Public Choice: Substance Depends upon Process James Hite’ Abstract Whether or not privatization facilitates rural development depends upon what rural development means. In practice, rural development often is the result of a struggle between rent defenders and rent seekers. A positivist concept of rural development is proposed, and the institutions of public choice are examined to determine how they might influence privatization decisions. The conclusion is that whether or not privatization improves efficiencyof adjustmentin rural economies depends upon the specifics of political deals required to achieve a particular act of privatization. Key words: privatization, rural development, public choice, rent-seeking Introduction development itself. In attempting to do so, privatization, which is a topic worthy of Privatization is a term applied to a political considerable discussion on its own, receives process whereby local and even state governments somewhat secondary treatment. across the United States spin off certain services to private sector operatives. This term is also applied Summarized briefly, the argument advanced to the process by which the Thatcher government in in this paper is as follows: rural development can the United Kingdom devolved to private investors be thought of positivistically, as well as certain industries previously nationalized by Labor normatively. Positivistically, rural development is an governments, and it is the popular term applied to observable, potentially predictable process of the process of transforming Russia and its former adjustment on the part of rural economies to satellite nations into market economies (Vickers and Schumpeterian change in a market system. It is in Yarrow 1988; 1991). Ostensibly this paper is about the material interest of society that this process of privatization and rural development.
    [Show full text]
  • Azimuth Corporation Employee Handbook
    Azimuth Corporation Employee Handbook ABOUT THIS HANDBOOK/DISCLAIMER This Employee Handbook is designed to acquaint you with Azimuth Corporation and to provide employees with an overview of the policies, procedures and management practices affecting employment with our company. Unless otherwise stated, these policies and practices apply to all Azimuth employees as of the date of this Employee Handbook, and those that may begin after its effective date. This Employee Handbook outlines the programs developed by Azimuth for the benefit of its employees, and the employee's responsibility to Azimuth and its customers. Each employee should read, understand and comply with the provisions of this handbook. Please take the necessary time to read it. Please contact your Supervisor and/or the Human Resources Department if you require additional information. Neither this handbook nor any other verbal or written communication by a management representative is, nor should it be considered to be, an agreement, contract of employment, express or implied, or a promise of treatment in any particular manner in any given situation, nor does it confer any contractual rights whatsoever. This Employee Handbook does not constitute a contract of employment between Azimuth and its employees, whether expressed or implied. The handbook, nor any portion of it, does not preempt the doctrine of employment-at-will. Azimuth Corporation adheres to the policy of employment at will, which permits the Company or the employee to end the employment relationship at any time, for any reason, with or without cause or notice. Many matters covered by this handbook, such as benefit plan descriptions, are also described in separate Company documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Workers and Labour in a Globalised Capitalism
    Workers and Labour in a Globalised Capitalism MANAGEMENT, WORK & ORGANISATIONS SERIES Series editors: Gibson Burrell, School of Management, University of Leicester, UK Mick Marchington, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester and Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, UK Paul Thompson, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, UK This series of textbooks covers the areas of human resource management, employee relations, organisational behaviour and related business and management fields. Each text has been specially commissioned to be written by leading experts in a clear and accessible way. The books contain serious and challenging material, take an analytical rather than prescriptive approach and are particularly suitable for use by students with no prior specialist knowledge. The series is relevant for many business and management courses, including MBA and post-experience courses, specialist masters and postgraduate diplomas, professional courses and final-year undergraduate courses. These texts have become essential reading at business and management schools worldwide. Published titles include: Maurizio Atzeni WORKERS AND LABOUR IN A GLOBALISED CAPITALISM Stephen Bach and Ian Kessler THE MODERNISATION OF THE PUBLIC SERVICES AND EMPLOYEE RELATIONS Emma Bell READING MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION IN FILM Paul Blyton and Peter Turnbull THE DYNAMICS OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS (3RD EDN) Paul Blyton, Edmund Heery and Peter Turnbull (eds) REASSESSING THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP Sharon C. Bolton EMOTION
    [Show full text]
  • Main Economic Indicators: Comparative Methodological Analysis: Wage Related Statistics
    MAIN ECONOMIC INDICATORS: COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS: WAGE RELATED STATISTICS VOLUME 2002 SUPPLEMENT 3 FOREWORD This publication provides comparisons of methodologies used by OECD Member countries to compile key short-term and annual data on wage related statistics. These statistics comprise annual and infra-annual statistics on wages and earnings, minimum wages, labour costs, labour prices, unit labour costs, and household income. Also, because of their use in the compilation of these statistics, the publication also includes an initial analysis of hours of work statistics. In its coverage of short-term indicators it is related to analytical publications previously published by the OECD for indicators published in the monthly publication, Main Economic Indicators (MEI) for: industry, retail and construction indicators; and price indices. The primary purpose of this publication is to provide users with methodological information underlying the compilation of wage related statistics. The analysis provided for these statistics is designed to ensure their appropriate use by analysts in an international context. The information will also enable national statistical institutes and other agencies responsible for compiling such statistics to compare their methodologies and data sources with those used in other countries. Finally, it will provide a range of options for countries in the process of creating their own wage related statistics, or overhauling existing indicators. The analysis in this publication focuses on issues of data comparability in the context of existing international statistical guidelines and recommendations published by the OECD and other international agencies such as the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), the International Labour Organisation (ILO), and the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat).
    [Show full text]
  • Reproducing Low-Wage Labour: Capital Accumulation, Labour Markets and Young Workers
    This is a repository copy of Reproducing low-wage labour: capital accumulation, labour markets and young workers. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138261/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Yates, E. orcid.org/0000-0001-9886-455X (2018) Reproducing low-wage labour: capital accumulation, labour markets and young workers. Industrial Relations Journal, 48 (5-6). pp. 463-481. ISSN 0019-8692 https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12195 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Yates, E. (2017) Reproducing low‐ wage labour: capital accumulation, labour markets and young workers. Industrial Relations Journal, 48: 463–481, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12195. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reproducing low wage labour: capital accumulation, labour markets, and young workers Edward Yates, University of Leicester Abstract: Drawing on evidence from Greater Manchester, this paper examines how structural changes in capital accumulation have created particular labour market outcomes which have led to young people becoming a source of cheap labour for the growing low-wage service economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfree Labor, Capitalism and Contemporary Forms of Slavery
    Unfree Labor, Capitalism and Contemporary Forms of Slavery Siobhán McGrath Graduate Faculty of Political and Social Science, New School University Economic Development & Global Governance and Independent Study: William Milberg Spring 2005 1. Introduction It is widely accepted that capitalism is characterized by “free” wage labor. But what is “free wage labor”? According to Marx a “free” laborer is “free in the double sense, that as a free man he can dispose of his labour power as his own commodity, and that on the other hand he has no other commodity for sale” – thus obliging the laborer to sell this labor power to an employer, who possesses the means of production. Yet, instances of “unfree labor” – where the worker cannot even “dispose of his labor power as his own commodity1” – abound under capitalism. The question posed by this paper is why. What factors can account for the existence of unfree labor? What role does it play in an economy? Why does it exist in certain forms? In terms of the broadest answers to the question of why unfree labor exists under capitalism, there appear to be various potential hypotheses. ¾ Unfree labor may be theorized as a “pre-capitalist” form of labor that has lingered on, a “vestige” of a formerly dominant mode of production. Similarly, it may be viewed as a “non-capitalist” form of labor that can come into existence under capitalism, but can never become the central form of labor. ¾ An alternate explanation of the relationship between unfree labor and capitalism is that it is part of a process of primary accumulation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, As Amended
    The Fair LaboR Standards Act Of 1938, As Amended U.S. DepaRtment of LaboR Wage and Hour Division WH Publication 1318 Revised May 2011 material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced fully or partially, without permission of the Federal Government. Source credit is requested but not required. Permission is required only to reproduce any copyrighted material contained herein. This material may be contained in an alternative Format (Large Print, Braille, or Diskette), upon request by calling: (202) 693-0675. Toll-free help line: 1-866-187-9243 (1-866-4-USWAGE) TTY TDD* phone: 1-877-889-5627 *Telecommunications Device for the Deaf. Internet: www.wagehour.dol.gov The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq. To Provide for the establishment of fair labor standards in emPloyments in and affecting interstate commerce, and for other Purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938”. § 201. Short title This chapter may be cited as the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938”. § 202. Congressional finding and declaration of Policy (a) The Congress finds that the existence, in industries engaged in commerce or in the Production of goods for commerce, of labor conditions detrimental to the maintenance of the minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency, and general well-being of workers (1) causes commerce and the channels and instrumentalities of commerce to be used to sPread and Perpetuate such labor conditions among the workers of the several States; (2) burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; (3) constitutes an unfair method of competition in commerce; (4) leads to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and (5) interferes with the orderly and fair marketing of goods in commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]