DOCSLIB.ORG

The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: a Comparison of Police- and Expert-Led Conferencing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: a Comparison of Police- and Expert-Led Conferencing University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2010 The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: A Comparison of Police- and Expert-Led Conferencing Hafsteinn Gunnar Hafsteinsson University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hafsteinsson, Hafsteinn Gunnar, "The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: A Comparison of Police- and Expert-Led Conferencing" (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 818. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/818 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: A Comparison of Police- and Expert-led Conferencing __________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the University of Denver University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts __________ by Hafsteinn Gunnar Hafsteinsson June 2010 Advisor: Tamra Pearson d’Estrée ©Copyright by Hafsteinn G. Hafsteinsson 2010 All rights reserved Abstract Author: Hafsteinn G. Hafsteinsson Title: The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: A Comparison of Police- and Expert-led Conferencing Advisor: Tamra Pearson d’Estrée Degree Date: June 2010 On first of October 2006 the Ministry of Justice in Iceland launch a restorative justice pilot project. Building on the pilot project data, this thesis evaluates the implementation of restorative justice into the criminal justice system in Iceland by asking victims, offenders and other participants in police- and expert-led conferencing to answer questionnaires’ relating to these two types of restorative justice practices to crime. The thesis compares its results with findings from a review conducted by Paul McCold (1998) who more than a decade ago challenged concerns on police facilitated conferencing. The data examined in the present thesis support Paul McCold’s findings that police officers are capable of conducting conferences in a highly restorative manner when dealing with minor degree offences and that conferencing is an effective restorative justice practice that should be encouraged when conducted by police officers or trained professionals. ii Acknowledgments I am immensely grateful for having met Paul McCold in 2005 when this project began, as it was he who informed me about police conferencing, introduced me to the most important literature and later helped me to acquire deeper insight into the restorative justice philosophy. I also want to deeply thank Dr. Tamra Pearson d’Estrée my thesis advisor and teacher at DU for introducing me to restorative justice, her highly qualified teachings and all-around professionalism. I also want to graciously thank Unnur, Kristján and Kristín for opening up their house to me and all a round support after my own house burned down in January 2009. A strong love and support has also poured from family and friends while finding my way to start and work on this project after my loving sister Sonja past away last fall. I would like to thank my loving sister Linda and her husband Ægir for always being there and my loving friend and nephew Andri for reminding me of what I can and have accomplished. My dear friend Elvar deserves more than a note as he is always willing and able to help when I ask. Last but not least I would like to thank Jonathan for his help on the thesis, Gabriella for her time spent proofreading my paper and Laura for allowing me to live in her house, use her car and even eat her food while working on my thesis in Denver, she is a true friend. iii Table of Contents ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................................I ACKNOWLEDGMENT ........................................................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENT............................................................................................................................III INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 1 REVIEW OF RELEVANT LITERATURE............................................................................................. 3 THE MEANING OR DEFINITION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE................................................... 5 THE ENCOUNTER CONCEPTION...........................................................................................7 THE REPARATIVE CONCEPTION ...........................................................................................9 THE TRANSFORMATIVE CONCEPTION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ................................................12 VALUES OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE .....................................................................................15 THE DICHOTOMY OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE VS. RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE ........................................17 IS THE MEANING OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DISTORTED BY THE RESTORATIVE VS. RETRIBUTIVE DICHOTOMY? ...............................................................................................................22 THE ROOTS OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE....................................................................................... 33 RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROCESSES AND PRACTICES ........................................................... 38 VICTIM-OFFENDER MEDIATION (VOM) ..............................................................................38 NEW ZEALAND STYLE FAMILY GROUP CONFERENCING (FGC) ..................................................40 AUSTRALIAN STYLE POLICE CONFERENCING.........................................................................41 THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VICTIM-OFFENDER MEDIATION AND CONFERENCING47 TYPICALLY LARGER CIRCLES OF STAKEHOLDERS IN CONFERENCING...........................................48 NEUTRALITY, IMPARTIALITY AND FAIRNESS...........................................................................48 THE PREPARATION DIFFERENCES ......................................................................................52 THE CONFERENCING SCRIPT ............................................................................................53 RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMS TYPOLOGY.......................................................................56 EVALUATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMS........................................................... 61 REPORT ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALITY..............................................61 MEASURES OF PARTICIPANT’S SATISFACTION........................................................................62 MEASURES OF PARTICIPANT’S PERCEPTION OF FAIRNESS ........................................................65 THE PROBABILITY OF GENERATING AND COMPLETION OF RESTITUTION AGREEMENTS.....................66 APOLOGIES AND REVENGE...............................................................................................67 VICTIMS BEFORE AND AFTER FEELINGS OF FEAR, ANGER AND SYMPATHY. ...................................68 POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS...................................................................................71 DIVERSION: THE EFFECT OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN CRIME PREVENTION..................................72 iv RECIDIVISM AFTER PROPERTY CRIME .................................................................................78 EVIDENCE SUMMARY ON RECIDIVISM..................................................................................80 MCCOLD’S EVALUATION OF POLICE-LED CONFERENCES ................................................... 84 INFORMATION ABOUT ICELAND, CRIME AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURES IN ICELAND95 BACKGROUND INFORMATION............................................................................................95 CRIME STATISTICS .........................................................................................................97 THE CONVENTIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCEDURE IN ICELAND..............................................98 THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND CONFERENCING IN ICELAND ................................................................................................................................................ 100 HOW RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DEVELOPED IN ICELAND ...........................................................100 WHY ICELAND APPLIED POLICE-LED CONFERENCING...........................................................103 EVALUATION OF POLICE- AND EXPERT-LED CONFERENCING......................................... 113 SUMMARY OF PRESENT RESEARCH ...................................................................................113 RESEARCH QUESTIONS..................................................................................................114 THE PILOT PROJECT ....................................................................................................116 METHOD ................................................................................................................................................ 120 EXPLANATIONS AND DEFINITIONS OF CONCEPTS .................................................................120
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norðurland Vestra
    NORÐURLAND VESTRA Stöðugreining 2019 20.03.2020 Ritstjórn: Laufey Kristín Skúladóttir. Aðrir höfundar efnis: Sigurður Árnason, Jóhannes Finnur Halldórsson, Einar Örn Hreinsson, Anna Lea Gestsdóttir, Guðmundur Guðmundsson, Sigríður Þorgrímsdóttir, Anna Lilja Pétursdóttir og Snorri Björn Sigurðsson. ISBN: 978-9935-9503-5-2 2 Norðurland vestra 5.4 Opinber störf .......................................................................................... 28 Stöðugreining 2019 6. Önnur þjónusta ............................................................................................ 31 6.1 Verslun .................................................................................................. 31 6.2 Ýmis þjónusta ........................................................................................ 31 Efnisyfirlit Inngangur .......................................................................................................... 6 6.3 Ferðaþjónusta ....................................................................................... 32 1. Norðurland vestra, staðhættir og sérkenni ................................................... 7 7. Landbúnaður ............................................................................................... 35 1.1 Um svæðið .............................................................................................. 7 7.1 Kjötframleiðsla ....................................................................................... 35 1.2 Íbúaþéttleiki ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Risk Assessment
    2019 National Risk Assessment Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing National Commissioner of the Icelandic Police 1 April 2019 National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Table of Contents Preface Infrastructure Legal environment, police services, and monitoring Methodology Consolidated conclusions Risk classification summary Predicate offences Cash Company operations Financial market Specialists Gambling Trade and services Other Terrorist financing References 2 Preface Iceland is probably not the first country coming to mind when most people discuss money laundering and terrorist financing. In an increasingly globalised world, however, Iceland is nowhere near safe against the risks that money laundering and terrorist financing entail. Nor is it exempt from a duty to take appropriate and necessary measures to prevent such from thriving in its area of influence. In September 1991, Iceland entered into collaboration with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which is an international action group against money laundering and terrorist financing. FATF has issued instructions on the measures member states shall take in response to the threat stemming from money laundering and terrorist financing. FATF's instructions have become global guidelines. For example, the European Union's directives have been in accordance with these guidelines. By joining FATF, Iceland obligated itself to coordinating its legislation with the action group's instructions. Regarding this, FATF's evaluation in 2017-2018 revealed various weaknesses in the Icelandic legislation. Iceland began responding, which, for example, entailed legalising the European Union's 4th Anti-money Laundering Directive. In accordance with the requirements following from FATF Recommendation no. 1, the above directive assumes that all member states shall carry out a risk assessment of the main threats and weaknesses stemming from money laundering and terrorist financing within the areas each member state controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Jörð Sveitarfélag Nafn Á Samningi Heimilisfang AUSTURLAND Arnheiðarstaðir Múlaþing Eiríkur J
    Jörð Sveitarfélag Nafn á samningi Heimilisfang AUSTURLAND Arnheiðarstaðir Múlaþing Eiríkur J. Kjerúlf Arnheiðarstaðir 701 Egilsstaðir Arnhólsstaðir Múlaþing Anna Lóa Sveinsdóttir Arnhólsstaðir, 701 Egilsstaðir Árteigur Múlaþing Kristján Guðþórsson Ásbrún 1, 700 Egilsstaðir Ás 1 Múlaþing Brynjólfur Guttormsson Bjarkasel 3, 700 Egilsstaðir Ásgarður Múlaþing Viðar Eiríksson Ásgarður 701 Egilsstaður Ásgeirsstaðir Múlaþing Guðrún Jónsdóttir Ásgeirsstöðum 701 Egilsstöðum Bessastaðir Fljótsdalshreppur Andrés H. Einarsson Laugavellir 4, 700 Egilsstaðir Birnufell Múlaþing Þórhalla Sigmundsdóttir Birnufelli, 701 Egilsstaðir Bláeyri Múlaþing Guttormur Sigurjónsson Fjóluhvammi 1, 700 Egilsstaðir Borg Múlaþing Draumalandið ehf./Þóra Borg, 701 Egilsstaðir Bragðavellir Múlaþing Ragnar Eiðsson/Þórunnborg Jónsdóttir Bragðavellir I, 765 Djúpavogi Breiðavað Múlaþing Jóhann G. Jóhannsson/Ólöf Ólafsdóttir Breiðavað 701 Egilsstaðir Brekka Múlaþing Stefán Jónasson Sólvellir 13, 700 Egilsstaðir Brekkuborg Fjarðabyggð Kristján Beekman Brekkuborg 760 Breiðdalsvík Brekkugerði Fljótsdalshreppur Jóhann F. Þórhallsson/Sigrún E. Ólafsdóttir Brekkugerði 701 Egilsstaðir Brekkugerðishús Fljótsdalshreppur Skáldahús ehf. Laugalæk 20, 105 Reykjavík Brekkusel Múlaþing Guðmundur Aðalsteinsson Norðurtúni 12, 700 Egilsstaðir Brú 2 Múlaþing Stefán Halldórsson Ranavað 7, 700 Egilsstöðum Dagverðargerði Múlaþing Pétur Stefánsson Markarflöt 24, 210 Garðabær Davíðsstaðir Múlaþing Davíðsstaðir ehf. Koltröð 24, 700 Egilsstaðir Dratthalastaðir Múlaþing Örvar Már Jónsson Háteigi 691 Vopnafjörður
    [Show full text]
  • Ferðamynstur Og Vinnusóknarsvæði Akranes, Selfoss Og Hveragerði
    Ferðamynstur og vinnusóknarsvæði Akranes, Selfoss og Hveragerði VIAPLAN.IS Janúar 2018 Ferðamynstur og vinnusóknarsvæði Akranes, Selfoss og Hveragerði VIAPLAN.IS [email protected] 25.janúar 2018 2 Efinsyfirlit 1 Inngangur ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Niðurstöður - samantekt ........................................................................................................................... 5 3 Bakgrunnur og forsaga .............................................................................................................................. 7 4 Íbúafjöldi og atvinna .................................................................................................................................. 9 5 Forsendur og framkvæmd ....................................................................................................................... 11 6 Niðurstöður – bakgrunnsupplýsingar ...................................................................................................... 13 6.1 Kyn og aldur ..................................................................................................................................... 13 6.2 Menntun .......................................................................................................................................... 15 6.3 Möguleiki á að vinna heima ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ICELAND 2006 Geodynamics Field Trip May 30 – June 8, 2006
    ICELAND 2006 Geodynamics Field Trip May 30 – June 8, 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology/ Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography This field trip guide was compiled by Karen L. Bice using information from Bryndís Brandsdóttir, Richard S. Williams, Helgi Torfason, Helgi Bjornsson, Oddur Sigurðsson, the Iceland Tourist Board and World W. Web Maps from Thordarson and Hoskuldsson, 2002, Iceland (Classic Geology in Europe 3), Terra Publishing, UK. Logistical genius: Andrew T. Daly Field trip participants: Mark Behn, Karen Bice, Roger Buck, Andrew Daly, Henry Dick, Hans Schouten, Martha Buckley, James Elsenbeck, Pilar Estrada, Fern Gibbons, Trish Gregg, Sharon Hoffmann, Matt Jackson, Michael Krawczynski, Christopher Linder, Johan Lissenberg, Andrea Llenos, Rowena Lohman, Luc Mehl, Christian Miller, Ran Qin, Emily Roland, Casey Saenger, Rachel Stanley, Peter Sugimura, and Christopher Waters The Geodynamics Program is co-sponsored by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution’s Academic Programs Office and Deep Ocean Exploration Institute. TUESDAY May 30 Estimated driving (km) Meet at Logan Airport, Icelandair ticket counter @ 7:00 PM (80 km ≈ 50 mi) Depart BOS 9:30 PM Icelandair flight Day 1 - WEDNESDAY May 31 Arrive Keflavík International Airport 6:30 AM (flight duration 5 hours) Pick up 2 vans, 2 trailers (Budget) Free day in Reykjavík Night @ Laugardalur campground, Reykjavík Dinner: on own in town Day 2 - THURSDAY June 1 270 Late start due to trailer problems (2 hrs @ AVIS) To Þingvellir N.P., then north to Hvalfjörður fjord, stop at Skorradalsvatn Night @ Sæberg Hostel (1 km. off Rte 1 in Hrútafjörður, west side of road) Tel. 354-4510015 Fax. 354-4510034 [email protected] Dinner: mexican-style chicken (Rachel, Trish, Chris) Day 3 - FRIDAY June 2 320 To Lake Myvatn Lunch stop in Akureyri, stop at Godafoss, stop at Skutustadir pseudocraters Night @ Ferdathjonustan Bjarg campsite, Reykjahlid, on shore of Lake Myvatn Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries
    Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir Lilja Magnúsdóttir Birgir Örn Smárason Gunnar Þórðarson Birgit Johannessen Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir Birgitte Jacobsen Unn Laksá Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir Svein Ø. Solberg Rólvur Djurhuus Sofie Erbs-Maibing Bryndís Björnsdóttir Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir Kjartan Hoydal Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson Amalie Jessen Hörður G. Kristinsson Daði Már Kristófersson Nette Levermann Business Development Nuka Møller Lund Josephine Nymand Skýrsla Matís 37-14 Ólafur Reykdal Janus Vang Desember 2014 Helge Paulsen Sveinn Margeirsson ISSN 1670-7192 Titill / Title Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries / Framtíðartækifæri í Vest-Norræna lífhagkerfinu Höfundar / Authors Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir, Lilja Magnúsdóttir, Birgir Örn Smárason, Gunnar Þórðarson, Birgit Johannessen, Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir, Birgitte Jacobsen, Unn Laksá, Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir, Svein Ø. Solberg, Rólvur Djurhuus, Sofie Erbs-Maibing, Bryndís Björnsdóttir, Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir, Kjartan Hoydal, Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson, Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson, Amalie Jessen, Hörður G. Kristinsson, Daði Már Kristófersson, Nette Levermann, Nuka Møller Lund, Josephine Nymand, Ólafur Reykdal, Janus Vang, Helge Paulsen, Sveinn Margeirsson Skýrsla / Report no. 37-14 Útgáfudagur / Date: December 2014 Verknr. / Project no. Styrktaraðilar /Funding: The Nordic Council of Ministers Arctic Co-operation Programme, NKJ (Nordic Joint Committee for Agricultural and Food Research), AG-Fisk (Working Group for Fisheries Co-operation), SNS (Nordic Forest Research), NordGen (the Nordic Genetic Resource Centre) and Matis. Ágrip á íslensku: Skýrslan gefur yfirlit yfir lífauðlindir á Íslandi, Færeyjum og Grænlandi, nýtingu þeirra og framtíðartækifæri sem byggja á grænum vexti. Skýrslan er góður grunnur fyrir markvissa stefnumótun og áherslur í nýsköpun fyrir framtíðaruppbyggingu á svæðinu. Á grunni verkefnisins hefur verið mótuð framkvæmdaráætlun með fjórum megin- áherslum; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Braving the Forces of Nature
    Official 15th World Scout Moot Magazine 2017 - Issue #2 BRAVING THE FORCES OF NATURE 1 Editorial Stefán Rafn Alþingi is in Session Sigurbjörnsson Welcome to Alþingi, the ence is that they made camp should abstain from Googling central camp at Úlfljótsvatn at Þingvellir, some 30 minutes it. during the 15th World Scout drive from Úlfljótsvatn (S/O Like the chieftains Moot. You have spent the first to Þingvellir expedition). Through every Moot and few days spread across this Jamboree we celebrate the of the ancient barren island, experiencing Like those chieftains you great diversity of our move- Alþingi you gath- its beautiful and sometimes gather to exchange ideas ment; diversity through unforgiving nature, which the and culture, ready to inspire nationality, language, religion, er to exchange participants in several Expedi- others from your community sexual orientation, gender tion Centers got to experience when the Moot disbands. The identity and more. We at ideas and culture, during the first few days of Alþingi gatherings were a Ratatoskr sincerely hope that ready to inspire the Moot. Like the chieftains noble event but please refrain you will seize this unique of the Icelandic medieval from the ancient Alþingi opportunity to maximize your others from your era, you make your journey practices of slave-trading, experiences and interactions, community from different corners of the dueling and the particularly whether it being exchanges of country and convene by lake gruesome “blood eagle” viking badges, scarves, ideas, culture, Úlfljótsvatn. The only differ- executions. The faint of heart opinions or romances. Expedition Mega Issue! The second issue of Ratatoskr but Hólaskjól is situated in the ing pictures from the talented is dedicated to the 11 Expedi- Highlands, far away from cell photographer we prominently tion Centers scattered around reception, running water or placed there, we decided that the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Viðauki 4. Tækjarými Mílu
    Viðauki 4. Tækjarými Mílu Nr. Tækjarými Póstnr Staður Staðsetning Svæði Tegund 95 Breiðholt 111 Reykjavík Norðurfell 15 Höfuðborgarsv. Blandaðir salir 98 Hafnarfjörður 220 Hafnarfjörður Strandgata 24 Höfuðborgarsv. Blandaðir salir 100 Kópavogur 200 Kópavogur Digranesvegur 7 Höfuðborgarsv. Blandaðir salir 103 Mosfellsbær 270 Mosfellsbær Skólabraut 1A (Háholt 4) 1A Höfuðborgarsv. Blandaðir salir 191 Akureyri 600 Akureyri Hafnarstræti 102 Norðurland E Blandaðir salir 253 Múlastöð 108 Reykjavík Suðurlandsbr. 28/Ármúli 25-28Höfuðborgarsv. Blandaðir salir 518 Landssímahús 101 Reykjavík Thorvaldsensst. 4-6 Höfuðborgarsv. Blandaðir salir 8 Arnarstapi 356 Snæfellsbær Arnarstapi Vesturland Dreifbýli 9 Axlarhólar 356 Snæfellsbær Axlarhólar Vesturland Dreifbýli 11 Oddstaðir 311 Borgarnes Oddstaðir Vesturland Dreifbýli 13 Fíflholt 311 Borgarnes Fíflholt Vesturland Dreifbýli 15 Fróðárheiði 356 Snæfellsbær Fróðárheiði Vesturland Dreifbýli 16 Furubrekka 356 Snæfellsbær Furubrekka Vesturland Dreifbýli 17 Gildruholt 360 Hellissandur Gildruholt Vesturland Dreifbýli 18 Grund 311 Borgarnes Grund Skorradal Vesturland Dreifbýli 19 Gröf Miklaholtshrepp 311 Borgarnes Gröf, Eyja- og Miklaholtshrepp Vesturland Dreifbýli 20 Haukatunga 311 Borgarnes Borgarbyggð Vesturland Dreifbýli 21 Háls Skógarströnd 340 Stykkishólmur Háls Vesturland Dreifbýli 22 Hellur 311 Borgarnes Hellur Vesturland Dreifbýli 23 Hrútsholt 311 Borgarnes Hrútsholt / Söðulsholt Vesturland Dreifbýli 24 Hnúkur 371 Búðardalur Hnjúkur Vesturland Dreifbýli 25 Hreðavatn 311 Borgarnes Hreðarvatn Vesturland
    [Show full text]
  • Nokkrir Megindrættir Í Búferlaflutningum 1986–2006 Main Trends in Migration in Iceland 1986–2006
    2007:1 y 13. febrúar 2007 Nokkrir megindrættir í búferlaflutningum 1986–2006 Main trends in migration in Iceland 1986–2006 Samantekt Undanfarin tvö ár hafa einkennst af umfangsmeiri flutningum til landsins en önnur ár. Tíðni aðfluttra umfram brottflutta í millilandaflutningum var 17,3 samanborið við 13,0 ári áður. Í öllum landshlutum voru aðfluttir fleiri en brottfluttir í millilandaflutningum. Þar munar mestu um Austurland en í kjölfar virkjana- og stóriðjuframkvæmda þar hafa flutningar frá útlöndum aukist hröðum skrefum undanfarin ár. Athygli verkur að erlendum körlum hefur fjölgað mjög ört í flutningum til Austurlands. Til ársins 2003 voru konur alla jafna fleiri en karlar í flutningum en nú er þessu öfugt farið. Mest áberandi er þetta á Austurlandi en þangað fluttu nær tíu sinnum fleiri karlar en konur frá útlöndum. Flutningsjöfnuður í innanlandsflutningum var neikvæður á öllum landsvæðum fyrir utan höfuðborgarsvæðið, Suðurnes og Suðurland. Í nær öllum þéttbýlis- stöðum á Norðurlandi og Vestfjörðum var flutningsjöfnuður innanlands neikvæður. Þetta á til að mynda við um Akureyri en ólíkt því sem verið hefur undanfarin ár fluttu fleiri frá bænum en til hans. Þótt flutningsjöfnuður í innanlandsflutningum sé neikvæður á Austurlandi var hann talsvert hærri en verið hefur og var -0,5 á 1.000 íbúa árið 2006 samanborið við -10,4 ári áður. Flutningsjöfnuður í stærstu þéttbýlisstöðunum á Austurlandi var jákvæður, einkum á Egilsstöðum en þar var flutningsjöfnuður í innanlandsflutningum hærri en annars staðar á landinu (93,7 á hverja 1.000 íbúa). Athugun á flutningum milli höfuðborgarsvæðis og landsbyggðar á umræddu tímabili leiðir í ljós að nokkuð hefur dregið úr því forskoti sem höfuðborgar- svæðið hefur haft á landsbyggðina undanfarna áratugi.
    [Show full text]
  • Co Saving by Using Geothermal Energy For
    CO2 SAVING BY USING GEOTHERMAL ENERGY FOR HOUSE HEATING IN ICELAND Mai 2008 Einar Gunnlaugsson Outline • Brief introduction to geothermal activity in Iceland • The use of geothermal energy in Iceland • District heating in Reykjavík • Production of geothermal water and changes in water level • CO2 saving by using geothermal water in Reykjavík • CO2 saving in countries using carbonate rich low-temperature geothermal water, example from Slovakia ICELAND Size: 104.000 km2 Population: 311,396 Average Jan. temp: -0.4°C Mean annual temp: 5°C Average July temp.: 11.2° July 2007 Geothermal activity in Reykjavík During Reykjavik's first 1000 years geothermal heat was primarily used for washing, bathing and cooking. For centuries women carried the laundry to the hot springs now in mid Reykjavík. Reykir The first house heated with geothermal water in 1909 Geothermal steam used for heating in 1912 Sturlureykir Twenty largest geothermal district heating utilities Reykjavík Suðurnes Reykjavík- the world’s largest Akureyri municipal geothermal heating service Hveragerði Selfoss Skagafjörður Akranes Borgarfjörður Mosfellsbær Seltjarnarnes Laugarás Húsavík Ólafsfjörður Dalvík-Árskógsströnd Flúðir Þorlákshöfn Egilsstaðir og Fell Rangæinga Blönduós Siglufjörður Húnaþing vestra 3 0 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 70.000 m 1928 Drilling started in in Reykjavík for hot water. 14 drillholes drilled Result about 14 l/s of 87°C water. 1930 District Heating in Reykjavík - 3 km long pipeline -Two school houses, hospital, swimming pool and 70 private houses connected. Reykir and Reykjahlíð Prior to exploitation artesian flow: 120 l/s Area: 5.5 km2 Temp: 65-100 °C Capacity : 1700 l/s No of exploitation wells : 34 Reykjahlíð field Reykir field Laugarnes – Area: 0.28 km2 – Temp: 125-130 °C – Capacity : 330 l/s – No of exploit.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Use of Geothermal Water for District Heating in Reykjavík And
    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010 Bali, Indonesia, 25-29 April 2010 Direct Use of Geothermal Water for District Heating in Reykjavík and Other Towns and Communities in SW-Iceland Einar Gunnlaugsson, Gretar Ívarsson Reykjavík Energy, Bæjarháls 1, 110 Reykjavík, Iceland [email protected] Keywords: Direct use, District heating, Reykjavík, Iceland 3. GEOTHERMAL WATER FOR HOUSE HEATING In the Icelandic sagas, which were written in the 12th – ABSTRACT 13th century A.D., bathing in hot springs is often The geothermal district heating utility in Reykjavík is the mentioned. Commonly bath was taken in brocks where hot world´s largest geothermal district heating service. It started water from often boiling springs would be mixed with cold on a small scale in 1930 and today it serves the capital of water. The famous saga writer Snorri Sturluson lived at Reykjavík and surrounding communities, about 58 % of the Reykholt in west Iceland in the 13th century. At that time total population of Iceland. All houses in this area are there was a bath at his farm but no information about its heated with geothermal water. Three low-temperature age, size or structure. There are also implications that fields, Laugarnes, Elliðaaár and Reykir/Reykjahlíð are used geothermal water or steam was directed to the house for for this purpose along with geothermal water from the high- heating (Sveinbjarnardóttir 2005). temperature field at Nesjavellir. Reykjavík Energy is also operating district heating utilities in 7 other towns outside In a cold country like Iceland, home heating needs are the capital area with total 15.000 thousand inhabitants and 7 greater than in most countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe Refers To: A
    32nd SESSION CPL32(2017)06final 29 March 2017 Local democracy in Iceland Monitoring Committee Rapporteurs1: Zdenek BROZ, Czech Republic (L, ECR) Jakob WIENEN, Netherlands (L, EPP/CCE) Recommendation 402 (2017)..................................................................................................................2 Explanatory memorandum ......................................................................................................................4 Summary This report follows the second monitoring visit to Iceland since it ratified the European Charter of Local Self-Government in 1991. It shows that the country has a satisfactory level of local democracy. The report praises recent developments fostering local self-government, including the promotion of the involvement of local authorities in national decision-making and increased inter-municipal co-operation and citizen participation in local authorities. In particular, it underlines that the national and local authorities were able to deal with a major financial crisis and its economic and social consequences without undermining local self-government. Nevertheless, the rapporteurs draw the authorities’ attention to the absence of a clear division of responsibilities between central government and local authorities, the lack of direct applicability of the Charter in the domestic legal system and the fact that the capital, Reykjavik, has not been granted a special status in accordance with Recommendation 219 (2007). Lastly, local authorities still do not have adequate resources for performing all their functions. The Congress recommends that the Icelandic authorities clarify the division of responsibilities between central government and local authorities and pass legislation to give the Charter legal force in Iceland’s domestic legal system. It also urges them to provide local authorities with adequate and sufficient financial resources and grant the city of Reykjavik a special status to take account of its particular needs compared to other municipalities.
    [Show full text]