Modeling Tonal Tension Review by: Fred Lerdahl, Carol L. Krumhansl Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4 (April 2007), pp. 329-366 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/mp.2007.24.4.329 . Accessed: 03/04/2013 13:59 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.84.127.40 on Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:59:23 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Modeling Tonal Tension 329 MODELING TONAL TENSION FRED LERDAHL participants’ responses (Bigand, Parncutt, & Lerdahl, Columbia University 1996; Cuddy & Smith, 2000; Krumhansl, 1996; Lerdahl & Krumhansl, 2004; Palmer, 1996; Smith & Cuddy, CAROL L. KRUMHANSL 2003). Our purpose here is to provide a comparatively Cornell University comprehensive empirical treatment and analysis of the model’s predictions over a range of musical styles. THIS STUDY PRESENTS AND TESTS a theory of tonal ten- By “tonal tension” we mean not an inclusive defini- sion (Lerdahl, 2001).