The Truth Behind Op Stack.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Operation Stack
House of Commons Transport Committee Operation Stack First Report of Session 2016–17 HC 65 House of Commons Transport Committee Operation Stack First Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 23 May 2016 HC 65 Published on 1 June 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour (Co-op), Liverpool, Riverside) (Chair) Robert Flello MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent South) Mary Glindon MP (Labour, North Tyneside) Karl McCartney MP (Conservative, Lincoln) Stewart Malcolm McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Glasgow South) Mark Menzies MP (Conservative, Fylde) Huw Merriman MP (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle) Will Quince MP (Conservative, Colchester) Iain Stewart MP (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Martin Vickers MP (Conservative, Cleethorpes) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/transcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Gordon Clarke (Committee Clerk), Gail Bartlett (Second Clerk), James Clarke (Committee Specialist), Andrew Haylen (Committee Specialist), Adrian Hitchins (Committee Specialist), Daniel Moeller (Senior Committee Assistant), Michelle Owens (Committee Assistant) and Estelle Currie (Media Officer). -
Infrastructure Delivery Plan
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan March 2021 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background and Policy Context ..................................................................................... 2 National Policy ...................................................................................................................... 2 Local Policy .......................................................................................................................... 3 Local Plan policy context and strategy for growth ................................................................ 4 Policy STR 1 - The Development Strategy .............................................................................. 6 What is infrastructure? ......................................................................................................... 8 Engagement ....................................................................................................................... 10 Prioritisation of infrastructure .............................................................................................. 11 Identified risks .................................................................................................................... 12 Timing ................................................................................................................................ 12 Costs ................................................................................................................................. -
15-19 North Street Ashford, Kent, Tn24 8Lf 15-19 North Street, Ashford, Kent, Tn24 8Lf 2
FREEHOLD TOWN CENTRE OFFICE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY WITH REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 15-19 NORTH STREET ASHFORD, KENT, TN24 8LF 15-19 NORTH STREET, ASHFORD, KENT, TN24 8LF 2 INVESTMENT SUMMARY Located in Ashford town centre, close to the High Street and within walking distance of Ashford International train station. Three self contained office buildings comprising 9,461 sq ft in total, with 10 car parking spaces Freehold Multi-let to three tenants on three separate leases AWULT of approximately 0.73 years to break options and 3.55 years to lease expiries Barclays in occupation of no. 17 have exercised their break in September 2016, leaving 5,340 sq ft (NIA) vacant and prime for alternative use or re-letting Current rent of £104,415 per annum, equating to an average rent of £11.04 per sq ft Asset Management Initiatives • Explore change of use on vacant space • Let vacant space • Settle dilapidations with Barclays Offers are invited in excess of £800,000 (Eight Hundred Thousand Pounds), reflecting a Capital Value of £85 per sq ft (assuming purchaser’s costs at 5.49%) A10 M1 M50 15-19 NORTH STREET, ASHFORD, KENT, TN24 8LF M40 3 A44 Colchester . Gloucester T S HA RDIN GE H ROA D T KEY R A40 W N E O M1 O Y M5 R W E LOCATION N M11 R L L A IL Oxford B H S D A1(M) S 11 E Chelmsford A T A D L O O R S L A40 E T R Bus route OM ER M25 E SE SET E R The property is located in Ashford, Kent, a historic market town T ER GH ROAD RO N M R A W A12 O O BU D M25 R S DIN W E H approximately 55 miles to the South East of London and 15 T A420 Watford O Knoll LanePARK MALL . -
The Regional Impact of the Channel Tunnel Throughout the Community
-©fine Channel Tunnel s throughpdrth^Çpmmunity European Commission European Union Regional Policy and Cohesion Regional development studies The regional impact of the Channel Tunnel throughout the Community European Commission Already published in the series Regional development studies 01 — Demographic evolution in European regions (Demeter 2015) 02 — Socioeconomic situation and development of the regions in the neighbouring countries of the Community in Central and Eastern Europe 03 — Les politiques régionales dans l'opinion publique 04 — Urbanization and the functions of cities in the European Community 05 — The economic and social impact of reductions in defence spending and military forces on the regions of the Community 06 — New location factors for mobile investment in Europe 07 — Trade and foreign investment in the Community regions: the impact of economic reform in Central and Eastern Europe 08 — Estudio prospectivo de las regiones atlánticas — Europa 2000 Study of prospects in the Atlantic regions — Europe 2000 Étude prospective des régions atlantiques — Europe 2000 09 — Financial engineering techniques applying to regions eligible under Objectives 1, 2 and 5b 10 — Interregional and cross-border cooperation in Europe 11 — Estudio prospectivo de las regiones del Mediterráneo Oeste Évolution prospective des régions de la Méditerranée - Ouest Evoluzione delle prospettive delle regioni del Mediterraneo occidentale 12 — Valeur ajoutée et ingénierie du développement local 13 — The Nordic countries — what impact on planning and development -
Operation Stack, Kent
transport modelling & appraisal confidence moves the world services • Client: Kent County Council • Date: 2009 • Goal: To provide an economic review of change to existing Operation Stack management, business case for proposed options. • Economic appraisal • Analysis of current data • Business case preparation CONTACT Dave Carter Client Director - South e: [email protected] t: +44 (0)148 374 2903 Operation Stack, Kent the challenge Operation Stack is the generic term given to the procedure used by Kent Police and Kent County Council to manage HGV traffic in accessing the Port of Dover or Channel Tunnel when volumes of freight traffic exceed the port/tunnel’s capacity. Sections of the M20 are used to park (stack) HGVs, releasing them as cross-channel capacity becomes available. Stacking is done in phases depending on the severity but could result in the M20 being closed to allow for parking together with local roads and areas. Previously Operation Stack has been in place for a number of times within short time scale and lasting up to 25 days which impacted on local resident’s perceptions, local businesses, the environment and Kent’s image. In addition there was little in place for regular overnight stays for HGVs. systra’s role We were commissioned by Kent County Council to consider the economic impacts of changing the way Operation Stack was managed. SYSTRA undertook a study to quantify the existing issues, taking into account future changes based on three scenarios of change – do nothing, do minimum and do something. The future scenarios involved the use of Quick Moveable Barriers to allow the M20 to continue to operate under a reduced capacity contra-flow arrangement in the short to medium term, with a view to a longer term solution, the preferred option being an emergency lorry park. -
Kent Lorry Parks Feasibility Study Demand Analysis and Business Model Report 28 February 2014 Within This Commission AECOM Is Not Giving Investment Advice
Kent Lorry Parks Feasibility Study Demand Analysis and Business Model Report 28 February 2014 Within this commission AECOM is not giving investment advice. The truck park assessments as set out in this report are based on a series of assumptions as set out in the report and associated technical notes and as agreed between AECOM and Kent County Council. The outcome of assessments are directly driven by the assumptions and the data used for the assessments and subject to uncertainty. Whilst the uncertainty of the assessments can be the subject of a risk analysis, the remit of this work does not include undertaking of risk analysis. Prepared by: ............................. Checked by: ............................................. Johan Els Jonpaul Simpson Principal Consultant Project Manager - Transportation Approved by: ............................ John Hix Regional Director Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Draft Final Report JH 15 Oct 2013 2 Final Demand Analysis and Business Model Report JH 28 Feb 2014 9th & 10th Floors, Sunley House, 4 Bedford Park, CR0 2AP Telephone: 020 8639 3500 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60305766 Reference Date Created 28 Feb 2014 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. -
M20 Junction
M20 Junction 10a TR010006 5.1 Consultation Report APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Revision A Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 5 July 2016 M20 Junction 10a TR010006 5.1 Consultation Report Volume 5 This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. Date: July 2016 M20 Junction 10a Consultation Report TR010006 Foreword Highways England has undertaken a fully managed programme of consultation with the local community and wider stakeholders. The consultation process has facilitated feedback which has been carefully considered throughout the development of the M20 junction 10a Scheme (the 'Scheme'). Pre-application consultation is an important element of any Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project. Highways England has taken careful consideration to relevant legislation, guidance and notes when designing the pre-application strategy. Early consultation addressed the main strategic and audience interaction needs to deliver a meaningful and progressive engagement programme. A number of different model groups were supported throughout the non-statutory engagement period. -
M20 Junction 10A Scheme Is Identified As a Key Transport Requirement and Is Essential to the Future Development of South Ashford
M20 J10A ACCESS TO SOUTH ASHFORD HIGHWAYS AGENCY TECHNICAL APPRAISAL REPORT M20 J10A ACCESS TO SOUTH ASHFORD PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT February 2009 Report Number GR053 Revision: Issue 1 M20 J10A – ACCESS TO THE SOUTH OF ASHFORD HIGHWAYS AGENCY PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................9 1.1 General............................................................................................................................9 1.2 Purpose of Consultation.................................................................................................9 1.3 Background...................................................................................................................10 2 PROPOSALS PRESENTED FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION............................................11 2.1 The Proposed Option – Junction 10A Gyratory ..........................................................11 2.2 Alternative options .......................................................................................................12 Alternative Option 1 – Further Improvements to Existing Junction 10.................................12 Alternative Option 2 – Junction 10A Single Bridge Interchange...........................................12 3 CONSULTATION ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................13 3.1 Information issued to Statutory Consultees................................................................13 -
M25 London Orbital with Astucia Studs Layout 1
CASE STUDY M25 LONDON ORBITAL WITH ASTUCIA STUDS Case Study Guiding the way on the M25 London Orbital PROJECT DETAILS Motorway DATE OF INSTALLATION 2009 Astucia is helping to improve driving conditions on the M25 LOCATION Motorway in Surrey, with the installation of approximately M25, Surrey, United Kingdom 4,500 Astucia SolarLite Road Studs. APPLICATION Astucia SolarLite Flush Road Studs BACKGROUND The M25 Motorway around London is one of the world’s longest orbital routes, covering 117 miles. The M25 is also one KEY BENEFITS of the busiest motorways in Europe being used by approximately 250,000 vehicles each day. Much of the 10x greater visibility for drivers motorway utilises street lighting to enhance driver visibility, than traditional reflective road however a number of junctions do not currently have lighting studs which increases driver safety risk due to restricted night time visibility. Excellent visibility in adverse Installing additional street lighting sites is an expensive exercise, with ever increasing weather e.g. fog, rain or surface costs of ongoing energy provision and environmental impact. It has been reported spray that electricity costs to power street lighting on motorways and ‘A’ roads in the UK Highlights sharp bends, dips in 1 was estimated at £15 million a year in 2009 . the road and other hazardous approaches Effective additional driver safety SOLUTION when used in conjunction with street light reduction schemes A recent project by Mouchel, a leading infrastructure and business services group has been designed to help improve driver visibility on a 6 mile unlit stretch of the M25 motorway between Junction 6 and the Clacket Lane Services. -
The M20 Motorway (Junctions 3 to 5) (Variable Speed Limits) (Amendment) Regulations 2019
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE M20 MOTORWAY (JUNCTIONS 3 TO 5) (VARIABLE SPEED LIMITS) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 2019 2019 No. 1158 1. Introduction 1.1 This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Department for Transport and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 2. Purpose of the instrument 2.1 These Regulations enable the operation of variable mandatory speed limits on the M20 motorway between junctions 3 and 5. 3. Matters of special interest to Parliament Matters of special interest to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments 3.1 None. Matters relevant to Standing Orders Nos. 83P and 83T of the Standing Orders of the House of Commons relating to Public Business (English Votes for English Laws) 3.2 As the instrument is subject to negative resolution procedure there are no matters relevant to Standing Orders Nos. 83P and 83T of the Standing Orders of the House of Commons relating to Public Business at this stage. 4. Extent and Territorial Application 4.1 The territorial extent of this instrument is England and Wales. 4.2 The territorial application of this instrument is England. Only those sections of motorway specified in the Schedule to the Regulations will be affected, all of which are in England. 5. European Convention on Human Rights 5.1 As the instrument is subject to negative resolution procedure and does not amend primary legislation, no statement is required. 6. Legislative Context 6.1 These Regulations have been made in respect of the use of particular lengths of special road (i.e. motorway) rather than in relation to the use of special roads generally. -
Read Our Response to the Highways England Operation Stack Consultation
Sessions House County Hall Maidstone ME14 1XQ 25 January 2016 Dear Paul Managing Freight Vehicles through Kent: A Highways England Consultation on a proposal to create a Permanent Lorry Area adjacent to the M20 at Stanford Response from Kent County Council This is Kent County Council’s (KCC) response to the consultation by Highways England on a proposal to create a Permanent Lorry Area adjacent to the M20 at Stanford. The current arrangement with Operation Stack as the main response to disruption to cross Channel traffic is unacceptable and therefore KCC strongly supports a Permanent Lorry Area to reduce or remove the need for freight traffic to be queued on the M20. It is essential that the motorway is kept open for two-way traffic flow at all times and is never closed for the queuing of freight vehicles. KCC gives provisional support, subject to Environment Statement, to Highways England’s proposal for a Permanent Lorry Area with a preferred site of ‘Stanford West’ for the principal reasons outlined in response to Question 13 of the consultation questionnaire. It is supported that this site operates as ‘alternative 3: General Disruption and Overnight Parking’ for the reasons described in response to Question 9 of the consultation questionnaire. In addition to emergency use in place of Operation Stack on the M20 this proposal will complement the Dover TAP, queues at Eurotunnel and address inappropriate overnight lorry parking. Truckstop facilities are already provided at the Stop24 services and therefore should not be replicated in the proposed Permanent Lorry Area, thus minimising additional disturbance to local residents and the impact on the AONB. -
FINAL-DDC-Brexit-Impact-Report
CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................4 2. HOW ARE WE FACILITATING AND INFLUENCING PREPAREDNESS? ........................... 6 3. THE CHEQUERS PLAN ........................................................................................................ 9 Key Details ............................................................................................................................9 Economy ....................................................................................................................... 10 Communities ................................................................................................................. 12 Socio-economic cooperation ......................................................................................... 12 Security ......................................................................................................................... 13 Progress .............................................................................................................................. 13 Alternatives to the Chequers Plan ................................................................................. 14 Can Article 50 be halted? .............................................................................................. 15 4. TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................ 17 Potential for Delayed Freight and Tourist Traffic .................................................................