DOCSLIB.ORG

An Examination of Affective Forecasting by Basketball Players

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Examination of Affective Forecasting by Basketball Players CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE MISPREDICTIONS: AN EXAMINATION OF AFFECTIVE FORECASTING BY BASKETBALL PLAYERS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Psychology, General-Experimental by Raffi Sarafian August 2015 The thesis of Raffi Sarafian is approved: ____________________________________________ Date:__________ Dr. Jacob Jensen ____________________________________________ Date:__________ Dr. Debra Berry Malmberg ____________________________________________ Date:__________ Dr. Mark P. Otten, Chair California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgement I would first like to thank my graduate advisor, Dr. Mark P. Otten, for his guidance, support and mentorship over the past three and a half years. I would also like to thank Drs. Ashley Samson, Jacob Jensen and Debra Malmberg for serving on my thesis committee and providing feedback, which was crucial to the success of this project. Additionally, this idea came to me through my competing in bicycling races and constantly feeling as though I wasn’t performing to my satisfaction as I always had hoped. I would like to thank my parents for their support through every step of this project, from the conception of the hypothesis through the final draft. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ii Acknowledgement iii Abstract v Introduction 1 Current Study 8 Method: Study 9 Participants 9 Measures 9 Procedure 10 Results: Study 12 Discussion 14 Limitations and future Direction 16 Conclusion 17 References 19 Appendix 22 iv ABSTRACT MISPREDICTIONS: AN EXAMINATION OF AFFECTIVE FORECASTING BY BASKETBALL PLAYERS by Raffi Sarafian Master of Arts in Psychology, General-Experimental Previous research on affective forecasting has investigated people’s perceptions of feelings and the way they predict their future emotional states. This is seen in every day situations by anyone and within athletes on teams. Research has revealed that for a team or group to succeed they must use team cohesion tactics. Team cohesion had not previously been studied as a covariate of affective forecasting to decrease mispredictions of feelings towards the outcome of future events. The present study hypothesized that basketball athletes would mispredict their feelings towards the outcome of a game regardless of that outcome. The present study also hypothesized that according to the forces of team cohesion, athletes playing on a team would predict future emotional states more accurately than those playing individually. Participants (n=115) with previous basketball playing experience were randomly assigned to either a one vs. one or two vs. two basketball playing condition. The participants completed a pre-game questionnaire, played a ten-minute basketball game, and completed a post-game questionnaire. Results revealed that regardless of the outcome of the game, athletes mispredicted their future emotional state toward the game's outcome. Results also showed that participants who played on teams predicted their future emotional states more accurately than those v playing individually. These findings suggest that team cohesion can lead to a better success in predicting one’s own future emotional state. vi INTRODUCTION Anyone who has visited the Las Vegas sports book, poker room, or craps table knows that predictions, whether correct or incorrect, are something that can bring about great emotion. One might experience happiness and excitement, or depending on the outcome of the prediction, anger and discomfort. Research on prediction shows that people tend to mispredict or overestimate their emotional state towards the outcome of a future event, which has been defined as affective forecasting (Wilson & Gilbert, 2005). Working in teams or a group could potentially decrease the likelihood of making this misprediction of emotional states. How closely a team or group works together has been defined as group cohesion (Festinger, 1950). To date, there is little research on group cohesion and its relationship with affective forecasting -- that is, the effect of cohesion on the accuracy of one’s prediction of future feelings toward the outcome of an event. Affective Forecasting and Impact Bias To further understand the mechanisms behind affective forecasting, one must understand the biases associated with it. Most commonly observed has been the impact bias, in which those who are forecasting mispredict the intensity of their predicted response to a future event. Kermer, Driver, Wilson, and Gilbert (2006) investigated affective forecasting and impact bias. In their study, 54 participants played a gambling computer game; participants had to guess which suit card was the top-ranked according to the computer. Participants were awarded 50 cents every time they guessed a correct top-ranked suit and 25 cents when guessing the second-ranked; if they guessed they lost 25 cents for the third-ranked and lost 50 cents if they guessed the fourth-ranked suit card. After the 25th 1 trial, the amount they won or lost so far was doubled. Both before and after the game, participants reported their level of happiness or unhappiness. The findings were that the participants who lost money experienced a greater impact on emotion than when they gained money. The researchers concluded that even if people have experienced losses throughout their lives, they still tend to mispredict the intensity of a loss compared to a gain in the same type of situation (Kermer et al., 2006). This misprediction has also been documented by other researchers. Morewedge and Buechel (2013) conducted a study in which participants were given pictures of two professors and told that they would compete against them in a simple motor skills task (i.e., pressing a two-letter sequence on the computer). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The participants in the first group were given a choice of which professor they wanted to compete against; those in the second group were told that they were competing against both professors. Prior to attempting the task, participants in both groups were asked to forecast the level of happiness they thought they would feel if they were to beat their chosen professor (for group 1) or both professors (for group 2). In both conditions, participants were told that they were the winners but were not told the exact score the professor(s) received, but the participants were always the winners. Results showed that those who were given the option to choose which professor they wanted to beat before actually attempting the task were more likely to commit the impact bias and mispredict their intensity of happiness. Morewedge, Gilbert, and Wilson (2005) investigated whether people could better forecast and predict their emotions towards the outcome of an atypical and highly 2 memorable event. The researchers’ hypotheses were: 1) when people forecast their feelings towards the outcome of a future event, they will rely on atypical instances (they are not accustomed to) and 2) when unaware that these instances are atypical, people will rely on affective forecasts. In study one, participants were male and female passengers getting off of a train. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions which were to describe a situation in which they missed a train (free recall condition), to describe their worst instance of missing the train (biased recall condition), or to describe three instances of missing their train (varied recall condition). Each participant then reported their level of happiness. Results showed that participants in the free recall condition made more negative forecasts than those in the biased and varied recall conditions. Overall, when a person is asked to freely describe a situation, there is a great deal of misprediction than when it relates to a much more specific event. In Morewedge and colleagues’ (2005) second study, the concept was kept the same as the first study but conducted during an undergraduate football game. The sample was 54 football fans randomly selected prior to the start of the football game. The participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions and were asked to describe either a football game they had seen when the team won (free recall), the best football game they had seen the team win (biased recall), or describe three football games where the team won (varied recall). The results revealed that there were more positive forecasts in the free recall condition than in the biased or varied recall conditions which were more negative. In another study exploring misprediction, Gilbert and Ebert (2002) aimed to see if people prefer changeable outcomes or unchangeable outcomes and if they can predict the 3 consequences of an outcome if changed. The researchers hypothesized that those who have been given an option to change their choice of a picture and given a few days to think about it will have greater impact bias in forecasting. In the study, participants from a photography class were randomly assigned to one of two groups (changeable or unchangeable groups) and asked to find two pictures that they really liked but could only keep one. The participants in the unchangeable condition could not go back to switch the picture after choosing one because the other picture would be thrown away. In the other condition, the participants were allowed to change their current selection of artwork with the one they did not select. The results revealed that when faced with a few days to change the picture, a participant experiences a longer period of wanting to change the picture and also mispredict their emotional levels. Affective Forecasting and Sports Researchers have also investigated affective forecasting in athletes. Research done by Dijk (2009) intended to determine whether track athletes experience the impact bias. The study investigated two hypotheses:1) according to the impact bias, track athletes would overestimate the intensity of their emotions following a race regardless of their success at the meet, and 2) according to the impact bias, track athletes would also predict that a loss impacts their emotions more than a win.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Utility and Happiness Miles Kimball and Robert Willis1 University of Michigan October 30, 2006 Abstract: Psychologists Have D
    Utility and Happiness Miles Kimball and Robert Willis1 University of Michigan October 30, 2006 Abstract: Psychologists have developed effective survey methods of measuring how happy people feel at a given time. The relationship between how happy a person feels and utility is an unresolved question. Existing work in Economics either ignores happiness data or assumes that felt happiness is more or less the same thing as flow utility. The approach we propose in this paper steers a middle course between the two polar views that “happiness is irrelevant to Economics” and the view that “happiness is a sufficient statistic for utility.” We argue that felt happiness is not the same thing as flow utility, but that it does have a systematic relationship to utility. In particular, we propose that happiness is the sum of two components: (1) elation--or short-run happiness--which depends on recent news about lifetime utility and (2) baseline mood--or long-run happiness--which is a subutility function much like health, entertainment, or nutrition. In principle, all of the usual techniques of price theory apply to baseline mood, but the application of those techniques is complicated by the fact that many people may not know the true household production function for baseline mood. If this theory is on target, there are two reasons data on felt happiness is important for Economics. First, short-run happiness in response to news can give important information about preferences. Second, long-run happiness is important for economic welfare in the same way as other higher-order goods such as health, entertainment, or nutrition.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics – Handout 10 My Notes on Mill’S Utilitarianism
    24.231 Ethics – Handout 10 My Notes on Mill’s Utilitarianism (1) General concerns: • Are interpersonal comparisons of utility even possible? • What are we talking about – maximizing total utility or average utility? • Both seem to ignore issues of distributive justice (except instrumentally – diminishing marginal utility of resources) • Average utility has some implausible implications (especially when considering harms, rather than benefits – is it really not worse for a total population of 100 people to be suffering torture than for a total population of 10 people to be suffering it?), and seems not to sit comfortably with utilitarian intuitions. Total utility invites the repugnant conclusion (but it’s important to remember that this isn’t just a problem for utilitarianism). (2) On higher and lower pleasures: • Should a utilitarian make any distinction between these? Is “pushpin as good as poetry,” if the quatity of pleasure they produce is the same? • How are we to determine which of two pleasures is higher? Is Mill’s appeal to “competent judges who have experienced both pleasures” plausible? And if competent judges prefer the higher pleasures, should we think they do so because activities leading them are more pleasurable, or have a higher quality of pleasure? Isn’t it perhaps more plausible to think they value them more for some other reason, having nothing to do with pleasure? • Relatedly, even if competent judges do take more pleasure in engaging in “higher” activities, are these activities more valuable because they are more pleasurable
    [Show full text]
  • The Distinctive Constitution of Feeling Hurt: a Review and a Lazarian Theory
    THE DISTINCTIVE CONSTITUTION OF FEELING HURT 1 The Distinctive Constitution of Feeling Hurt: A Review and a Lazarian Theory David J. K. Hardecker Leipzig University, Department of Early Child Development and Culture, Germany Email: [email protected] Tel: T +49 (0) 341 97 31 874 September 28, 2018 The author is supported by a financial scholarship from the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Germany. Abstract What is the nature of feeling hurt? I answer this question by systematically reviewing and integrating theories and empirical findings on feeling hurt using Lazarus’ theory of emotion. Following this approach, feeling hurt is constituted by a primary appraisal of an illegitimate devaluation and by a secondary appraisal of low controllability which together activate an action tendency to withdraw from an interaction. I derive several predictions, e.g., that an increase in appraisals of controllability should turn hurt into anger. I also point out hypotheses on the facial, vocal, bodily and behavioral expression of feeling hurt and it’s communicative function. Further, I draw important conceptual distinctions between a broad and a narrow concept of feeling hurt as well as between feeling hurt as an emotion, a hurtful event and a long-term emotional episode of hurt. Finally, I systematically compare feeling hurt with humiliation, shame, guilt, disappointment, sadness, and anger. Keywords: hurt feelings, self-conscious emotion, shame, humiliation, anger The Distinctive Constitution of Feeling Hurt: A Review and a Lazarian Theory 1. Introduction As several newspapers reported in August 2015, a man called Ebrahim H. B. had been engaged to be married but the family of the bride-to-be had unexpectedly canceled the wedding just a few weeks before the wedding feast.
    [Show full text]
  • Emotion Classification Based on Biophysical Signals and Machine Learning Techniques
    S S symmetry Article Emotion Classification Based on Biophysical Signals and Machine Learning Techniques Oana Bălan 1,* , Gabriela Moise 2 , Livia Petrescu 3 , Alin Moldoveanu 1 , Marius Leordeanu 1 and Florica Moldoveanu 1 1 Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Bucharest 060042, Romania; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (M.L.); fl[email protected] (F.M.) 2 Department of Computer Science, Information Technology, Mathematics and Physics (ITIMF), Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, Ploiesti 100680, Romania; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest 030014, Romania; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40722276571 Received: 12 November 2019; Accepted: 18 December 2019; Published: 20 December 2019 Abstract: Emotions constitute an indispensable component of our everyday life. They consist of conscious mental reactions towards objects or situations and are associated with various physiological, behavioral, and cognitive changes. In this paper, we propose a comparative analysis between different machine learning and deep learning techniques, with and without feature selection, for binarily classifying the six basic emotions, namely anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, and surprise, into two symmetrical categorical classes (emotion and no emotion), using the physiological recordings and subjective ratings of valence, arousal, and dominance from the DEAP (Dataset for Emotion Analysis using EEG, Physiological and Video Signals) database. The results showed that the maximum classification accuracies for each emotion were: anger: 98.02%, joy:100%, surprise: 96%, disgust: 95%, fear: 90.75%, and sadness: 90.08%. In the case of four emotions (anger, disgust, fear, and sadness), the classification accuracies were higher without feature selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Feelings of Sadness
    MANAGING FEELINGS OF SADNESS What is Sadness? Sadness and grief are natural feelings for patients and families facing the end of life. Sadness is a normal response to difficult life experiences and often is accompanied by tears, anger and/or disappointment. Grief occurs for people who have experienced or are experiencing a loss. Grief often occurs before a loved one dies as friends and family begin to experience changes in activities, relationships, and routines due to the person’s health issues. Feelings of sadness and grief may come and go and can be interspersed with joy and laughter. Sadness and grief often look different from one person to the next depending on each person’s background and culture. However, these feelings can become all-consuming and can interfere with the ability to experience joy and happiness during meaningful times. When sadness becomes overwhelming, it is important to reach out and talk to someone. Sadness vs. Depression Identifying the difference between grief or sadness and depression can be difficult. Your hospice Care Team, particularly your counselor, can help you sort it out. Depression differs from sadness and is a serious illness that should be taken seriously. While sadness can be intermittent, depression usually lingers and can be profoundly difficult to deal with. Depression can include: feelings of persistent helplessness or hopelessness feelings of worthlessness, guilt or shame long lasting, unending sadness, gloom, numbness physical symptoms like fatigue, weight changes, changes in sleep patterns difficulty focusing and thinking sometimes persistent thoughts of death and suicide. If you or your loved one is suffering from these symptoms or has a known history of depression, please tell your care team so that they can help you identify treatment options to help reduce the suffering of depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Emotions in Informal Feedback: the Benefits Of
    HUM0010.1177/0018726714532856Human RelationsJohnson and Connelly 532856research-article2014 human relations human relations 2014, Vol. 67(10) 1265 –1290 Negative emotions in informal © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: feedback: The benefits of sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0018726714532856 disappointment and drawbacks hum.sagepub.com of anger Genevieve Johnson University of Oklahoma, USA Shane Connelly University of Oklahoma, USA Abstract Using the emotions as social information (EASI) model, this study investigated the emotional, attitudinal and behavioral reactions to failure feedback by manipulating negative emotional displays (angry, disappointed or none) and the position level and relational distance of the feedback source. Undergraduate students (N = 260) responded to an organizational failure feedback vignette and completed a subsequent performance task. Results demonstrated that guilt was the complementary emotional experience following displays of disappointment, while reciprocal anger followed displays of anger. These emotional reactions served as important mediators between the emotional displays paired with the feedback message and participant responses of social behaviors, creative task performance and perceptions of the feedback source. In addition, our findings indicated that negative emotions can have positive organizational and interpersonal outcomes. Guilt in response to disappointed displays resulted in beneficial behaviors and attitudes, while anger in response to angry displays was socially detrimental. The emotion displayed during feedback provision also served as a consistent contextual factor that did not interact with the position level or relational distance of the feedback source to impact behavioral and attitudinal reactions. Overall, this study Corresponding author: Genevieve Johnson, Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Center for Applied Social Research, 3100 Monitor Ave, Suite 100, Norman, OK 73072, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Desire and Rationality in Desire: an Unapologetic Defense Peter Railton Preliminary Draft of October 2008—Please Do Not Circulate Without Permission
    Rational Desire and Rationality in Desire: An Unapologetic Defense Peter Railton Preliminary draft of October 2008—please do not circulate without permission Introduction Consider Robert Stalnaker’s well-known, elegant formulation of the interlocking, functional nature of belief and desire: Belief and desire … are correlative dispositional states of a potentially rational agent. To desire that P is to be disposed to act in ways that would tend to bring it about that P in a world in which one’s beliefs, whatever they are, were true. To believe that P is to be disposed to act in ways that would tend to satisfy one’s desires, whatever they are, in a world in which P (together with one’s other beliefs) were true. [Stalnaker (1984), 15; emphasis added] This characterization gives a picture of a potentially rational agent as, so to speak, at the mercy of his beliefs and desires, whatever they are. Whether an individual agent is actually rational, one might naturally think, will depend on what fills in for ‘whatever they are’—for this will determine the shape of her life and, roughly, who, if anyone, is in charge. Put another way: Autonomy will depend heavily on how ‘whatever they are’ is filled in—what role does the agent herself play? And rationality will depend heavily on what is filled in—will the agent’s beliefs and desires be as they rationally should be?1 The thought is: If your beliefs and desires are as they rationally should be, and you as agent have played the right sort of role in acquiring them, then insofar as they are functioning normally—namely, as Stalnaker indicates—to guide how you act, then your actions, too, will be autonomous, and as they rationally should be.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgiveness in Marriage
    Forgiveness In Marriage Forgiveness is a gift not a given. When we choose to forgive our spouse, we are giving up our "right" to hold something against them. Asking for Forgiveness 1. Make an unconditional apology An unconditional apology focuses on our responsibility in the matter - not our spouse's. It should sound something like this, "I was wrong for what I did and I am so sorry." Period. We don't make excuses or point the finger at our mate. An unconditional apology should not sound like this, "I am sorry, BUT IF YOU wouldn't have..." That is NOT an unconditional apology. 2. Humbly ask for the gift of forgiveness Again, since forgiveness is not a given, we must ask for it. After our apology we need to sincerely ask our mate to forgive us. 3. Follow up with action This is what gives substance to apologizing and asking for forgiveness. We need to sincerely repent - or turn away - from our wrongs. Whether it's attitudes or actions, we need to show our spouse that we are changing. And, we need to be open to their input as to what constitutes satisfactory change. Remember, they are the one who has been hurt so they might require more from us than we think necessary. But, we should be aware of their needs and be open to their suggestions. 4. Give your spouse time Even if our spouse does accept our apology and grant forgiveness, we can't expect things to be better right away. Now sure, you might get over the small things more quickly - but for bigger things, it can take our spouse time to warm up to us again.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Watering the Seeds of Compassion
    Research in Human Development, 12: 280–287, 2015 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1542-7609 print / 1542-7617 online DOI: 10.1080/15427609.2015.1068060 Understanding and Watering the Seeds of Compassion Mark T. Greenberg and Christa Turksma Pennsylvania State University The authors call for a broad agenda to create comprehensive models and research on the devel- opment and promotion of empathy and compassion. This wish would lead to a new level of 5 developmental/ecological understanding of the growth of compassion as well as effective policies and practices and interventions that nurture caring, compassion, and service to others in our schools and communities. The authors define empathy and compassion, briefly discuss the outline of early developmental processes, and call for basic research on these essential aspects of human develop- ment. The authors conclude by discussing the need to develop new ways to promote empathy and 10 compassion in families, schools and communities. Our wish is for a life-span developmental psychology to make greater contributions to building a compassionate world society. This calls for a broad agenda to create comprehensive models and research on the development and promotion of emotional awareness, empathy, and com- passion. The practical outcome of such a comprehensive program would include (1) clearer 15 developmental/ecological models of the growth of compassion; (2) effective policies, programs, and practices that support the development of caring, compassion, and service to others in our schools and communities; and (3) children, youth, and adults who show greater service to others as well as caring about the preservation of the earth’s ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching the Minds and Hearts of Those We Serve
    Connection Through Self-Compassion and Compassion for Others: Reaching the Minds and Hearts of Those We Serve Roseann Cervelli, MS, LACDC, CCS, CPS [email protected] 732-937-5437 Ext.122 Compassion, COVID 19 And the Year 2020: A New Threshold for Humanity Objectives • To analyze and explore how Mindful Self-Compassion serves as an antidote to apathy and disconnection in today’s world. • To define Mindful Self-Compassion and Compassion for Others as an approach to well-being, physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually. • To describe how Compassion Awareness can address meeting Basic Core Needs and healing Core Wounds • To explore the Neuroscience within Compassion Focused Therapy and Compassion Awareness. • To introduce and experience several Mindful Compassion Exercises and Practices What words come to mind when you hear or see the word "APATHY"? ⓘ Start presenting to display the poll results on this slide. What Is Apathy ? A feeling and/or attitude of indifference, unconcern, unresponsiveness, detachment, dispassion. An absence of interest or concern about emotional, social, spiritual, philosophical and/or physical life and the world. Why Apathy? To understand the part of us that Rarely is it good to run, but we are wants nothing to do with the full wiser, more present, more mature, necessities of work, of more understanding and more relationship, of loss, of seeing thoroughly human when we realize what is necessary, is to learn we can never flee from the need to humility, to cultivate self- run away. compassion and to sharpen that - David Whyte, Consolations: The Solace, Nourishment and sense of humor essential to a Underlying Meaning of Everyday Words (2106) merciful perspective of both a self and another.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perfect Storm: Gay Men, Crystal Meth and Sex Cultural Considerations for Gay Affirming Treatment
    The Perfect Storm: Gay Men, Crystal Meth and Sex Cultural Considerations for Gay Affirming Treatment Craig Sloane, LCSW, CASAC Private Practice New York City [email protected] 917-670-0483 How did Crystal Meth become so popular with Gay Men? In order to figure this out we need to understand: • Pharmacology of Crystal Meth • Cultural consideraons • Crystal meth, gay men and sex • Crystal meth and HIV • Gay Male Sex and Drug SuB-Cultures • Gay Men’s Vulnerabili:es to SuBstance ABuse and Why Crystal Meth is such a “Good Fit” How can addic9on professionals help? In order to figure this out we need to understand: • Gay Affirmave Treatment • How to Treat the Fusion of Crystal Meth Use and Sex • How to Overcome the Unique Challenges of Treang this PoPulaon Pharmacology of Methamphetamine Street Names for Methamphetamine • Chrissy • Ice • Crystal • Speed • Meth • Crank • Tina • Glass What is Crystal Meth? Crystal meth can Be found as a white, yellowish or reddish Powder, a waxy solid or a clear rock. A 1⁄4 gram dose costs about $20. As a s:mulant, crystal increases the release of doPamine and norePinePhrine, the Brain’s Pleasure and alert chemicals. This Produces euPhoria, increases energy, Prolongs sexual Performance, and suPPresses apPe:te. Crystal can also Produce feelings of Power, confidence, invulnerability, and intense sexual desire. The high can last 8 to 12 hours (dePending on tolerance) and is followed By a Period of exhaus:on, dePression, irritability, and (some:mes) Paranoia known as the “crash.” Crystal is extremely addic:ve. Many gay and Bi men overes:mate their ability to keeP recreaonal use from escalang into dependence History of Methamphetamines • 1887 synthesized By German Pharmacologist L.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Contrasting of Counterfactual Fantasies Attenuates Disappointment, Regret, and Resentment
    Motiv Emot (2018) 42:17–36 DOI 10.1007/s11031-017-9644-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Mental contrasting of counterfactual fantasies attenuates disappointment, regret, and resentment Nora Rebekka Krott1 · Gabriele Oettingen1,2 Published online: 31 October 2017 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017 Abstract Negative emotions elicited by positive counter- “If only I had married that girl, my life would have been factuals about an alternative past—“if only” reconstructions different. We would have been a good match for each other of negative life events—are functional in preparing people and we would have made a great couple…” Such mental to act when opportunities to restore the alternative past will representations of how our lives could have been better are arise. If the counterfactual past is lost, because restorative termed counterfactual, representing an alternative scenario opportunities are absent, letting go of the negative emotions to the factual past (Kahneman and Miller 1986; Kahne- should be the better solution, sheltering people from feelings man and Tversky 1982; Roese 1997). People who engage of distress. In six experimental studies, the self-regulation in spontaneous counterfactual thinking tend to elaborate on strategy of mental contrasting (Oettingen, European Review better alternatives to past events (i.e., upward counterfactu- of Social Psychology 23:1–63, 2012) attenuated the negative als; Nasco and Marsh 1999; Roese 1997). Those idealized emotions elicited by positive fantasies about a lost counter- upward counterfactuals emerge in response to negative affect factual past, specifically, disappointment, regret and resent- about past events (Markman et al. 1993; Roese 1997; Roese ment. Mental contrasting (vs.
    [Show full text]