Type and Breed Characteristics and Uses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Type and Breed Characteristics and Uses E-190 3/09 Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle V: Type and Breed Characteristics and Uses A 1700s painting of the foundation cow of one of the first cattle breeds. Courtesy of Michigan State University Animal Science Department. Stephen P. Hammack* he subject of breeds intrigues most beef cattle sphere. The Bos taurus in the United States originated in producers. However, breeds are only part of a ge- the British Isles and western continental Europe. The Bos netic strategy that should include: indicus arose in south central Asia. T• Matching applicable performance or functional There are some intermediates containing both Bos levels to environmental, management, and taurus and Bos indicus. Some intermediates created in the marketing conditions United States, particularly in Texas, are commonly re- • Choosing a breeding system, either continuous ferred to as American breeds, which will be discussed later. (in which replacement females are produced Although it has no strict definition, a breed can be within the herd) or terminal (in which replace- described as animals of common origin with certain dis- ments are introduced externally) tinguishing characteristics that are passed from parent • Selecting genetic types, breeds within types, and individuals within breeds that are compat- *Professor and Extension Beef Cattle Specialist–Emeritus, The Texas A&M System ible with the performance level needed and breeding system chosen. Genetic classifications and breeds Cattle can be divided into two basic classifications, Bos taurus (non-humped) and Bos indicus (humped, also called Zebu). Cattle are not native to the western hemi- to offspring. Breed characteristics result from To characterize milking potential accurately, both natural selection and from that imposed it should be evaluated relative to body size. by people. Higher-milking females need more nutrients Currently, more than 75 breeds can be reg- for body maintenance and require higher-quali- istered in the United States. For a discussion of ty diets, even when not lactating. Again, consult breed development, see another publication in E-188, Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef this series, E-180, Texas Adapted Genetic Strate- Cattle—III: Body Size and Milking Level. gies for Beef Cattle—VI: Creating Breeds and Age at puberty Composites. Age at puberty relates to body size, milking Most breeds have registry associations that potential, and genetic classification. Smaller record ancestry, define and document char- cows and higher milking types usually mature acteristics, and promote the breed. In this earlier, whereas Bos indicus mature relatively publication, estimates of functional traits or late. Although higher milking females, even characteristics are based on estimates of breed large ones, often reach puberty and conceive averages, but individuals can vary considerably when relatively young, subsequent fertility can within breeds. suffer because they may become thin after Functional traits or characteristics beginning lactation. While Bos indicus types reach puberty relatively late, their productive The major functional traits important in life is usually longer. Texas beef production include body size, milk- ing potential, age at puberty, hot climate adapt- Hot climate/tropical adaptability ability, fleshing ability, muscle expression, cut- Adaptability to hot climates is highest in ability, and marbling. cattle with Bos indicus inheritance, but some Bos taurus are reasonably heat tolerant. Ani- Body size mals with lighter colored, short hair coats and Body size is best evaluated as weight at a stat- dark skin are best adapted. ed level of condition or body fatness. Although High humidity intensifies the effects of heat, there are exceptions, weight at all ages tends to especially because hot, humid climates often add be positively related—cattle heavier at birth tend the stresses of parasites and low-quality forage. to be heavier throughout life. Genetically larger Heat with humidity stresses cattle that fail to animals usually gain weight faster, and weight shed long, thick hair coats, particularly dark- and nutritional requirements for body mainte- colored ones. As might be expected, animals nance are closely related. tolerant to hot climates are less adapted to cold. Size is discussed in Extension publication E-188, Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Fleshing ability Beef Cattle—III: Body Size and Milking Level. Fleshing ability is the body’s capacity to Frame score, an objective measure of skeletal fatten and retain fat. Fleshing ability tends to dimension used to estimate current and future drop with increases in genetic body size, body size, is discussed in Extension publication maintenance requirements relative to size, E-192, Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef milking level, and inherent muscularity. Cattle—X: Frame Score and Weight. Animals poorly adapted to their environment An important inconsistency occurs in Bos generally are low in fleshing ability. indicus in body size relationships. Calves from Bos indicus often flesh more easily than other dams containing Bos indicus inheritance are types on low-quality forage and roughage. relatively small at birth, usually resulting in few Easy-fleshing cattle tolerate periods of nutri- difficulties in calving. However, calves by Bos tional energy deficiency more easily and, indicus sires out of Bos taurus dams often are therefore, may reproduce more consistently, but relatively large, so calving may be more difficult. they also over fatten more readily in the feed- yard unless properly managed. Milking potential Milking potential is the genetic capability to Muscle expression produce milk. This is not the actual volume of Muscle expression is inherent muscularity, milk produced, which also is influenced by the independent of other body tissues. Muscling is cow’s nutrition and the calf’s growth potential the second most important factor in cutability. and nursing pressure. Heavy-muscled types often are low in fleshing 2 ability, so reproductive efficiency may be • British Beef—British-originated breeds reduced. and combinations among those breeds used for beef production only. Cutability • Continental Beef—Continental European Cutability, or the percentage of lean, is breeds and derivatives developed exclu- usually evaluated in beef carcasses as USDA sively for beef production. These are part Yield Grade. Cutability depends on relative of what are sometimes called “exotics.” amounts of fat (which varies greatly), muscle, • Continental Dual Purpose—Breeds se- and bone (which varies least). lected for both beef and dairy production When genetic types or breeds are compared in their native areas, mostly Continental for differences in cutability, it is assumed that Europe, and combinations of beef and the breeds have similar nutrition levels. But dairy breeds. Dual Purpose breeds are inherent cutability differences can be readily used only for beef in the United States. altered by varying nutrition to achieve similar They are the other part of “exotics.” degrees of fatness. • Dairy—Originating in western Conti- Marbling nental Europe or the British Isles and Marbling, or intramuscular fat, is the primary selected in the United States for dairy factor determining USDA Quality Grade, an purposes only, with beef production oc- indicator of the palatability factors of tenderness, curring secondarily. juiciness, and flavor. Marbling increases with age • Bos indicus—Of pure or very high per- up to physiological maturity and generally is centage Bos indicus background and used higher in earlier maturing and higher milking only for beef production. types. Feeding high-energy rations starting early • American—Includes beef breeds created in life for extended periods generally increases in the United States from combinations marbling. of about one-fourth to one-half tropical- adapted inheritance, typically the Bos indi- Bos indicus and most heavy-muscled, low- cus-derived Brahman, with the remainder milking types have relatively low marbling. usually consisting of British Beef breed(s), Because marbling relates somewhat to body although Continental Beef or Continental fatness, especially in comparing breeds or types, Dual Purpose may also be found. there is usually a trade-off between Yield Grade • Specialty—Includes breeds that cannot be and Quality Grade. As one improves, the other placed logically in any of these groups, of- tends to decline. For a discussion of carcass ten characterized by particular emphasis genetic considerations, see E-165, Texas Adapted on certain traits. Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle—IX: Selection for Carcass Merit. Matching functional levels An important consideration in determining optimum functional levels is that types of cattle to production criteria may differ in relative performance under varying Climate and nutrition are key variables conditions. For a discussion of this topic, see affecting the locations where differing types E-187, Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef and breeds can be produced. Production suffers Cattle—II: Genetic-Environmental Interaction. when cattle are not adapted to climatic condi- tions. In hot, humid climates, cattle benefit Breeds and functional types from some Bos indicus or other tropical-adapt- ed genetics. Table 1 lists the characteristics of the major breeds of cattle in Texas—those most numerous Table 2 shows the effects of nutrition on or most familiar in the state—by estimates of optimum levels of three primary production
Recommended publications
  • Purebred Livestock Registry Associations
    Purebred livestock registry associations W. Dennis Lamm1 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE no. 1.217 Beef Devon. Devon Cattle Assn., Inc., P.O. Box 628, Uvalde, TX 78801. Mrs. Cammille Hoyt, Sec. Phone: American. American Breed Assn., Inc., 306 512-278-2201. South Ave. A, Portales, NM 88130. Mrs. Jewell Dexter. American Dexter Cattle Assn., P.O. Jones, Sec. Phone: 505-356-8019. Box 56, Decorah, IA 52l01. Mrs. Daisy Moore, Amerifax. Amerifax Cattle Assn., Box 149, Exec. Sec. Phone: 319-736-5772, Hastings, NE 68901. John Quirk, Pres. Phone Friesian. Beef Friesian Society, 213 Livestock 402-463-5289. Exchange Bldg., Denver, CO 80216. Maurice W. Angus. American Angus Assn., 3201 Freder- Boney, Adm. Dir. Phone: 303-587-2252. ick Blvd., St. Joseph, MO 64501. Richard Spader, Galloway. American Galloway Breeders Assn., Exec. Vice. Pres. Phone: 816-233-3101. 302 Livestock Exchange Bldg., Denver, CO 80216. Ankina. Ankina Breeders, Inc., 5803 Oaks Rd,. Cecil Harmon, Pres. Phone: 303-534-0853. Clayton, OH 45315. James K. Davis, Ph.D., Pres. Galloway. Galloway Cattle Society of Amer- Phone: 513-837-4128. ica, RFD 1, Springville, IA 52336. Phone: 319- Barzona. Barzona Breeders Assn. of America, 854-7062. P.O. Box 631, Prescott, AZ 86320. Karen Halford, Gelbvieh. American Gelbvieh Assn., 5001 Na- Sec. Phone: 602-445-2290. tional Western Dr., Denver, CO 80218. Daryl W. Beefalo. American Beefalo Breeders, 1661 E. Loeppke, Exec. Dir. Phone: 303-296-9257. Brown Rd., Mayville 22, MI 48744. Phone: 517-843- Hays Convertor. Canadian Hays Convertor 6811. Assn., 6707 Elbow Dr. SW, Suite 509, Calgary, Beefmaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Makes the Difference
    Data Makes the Difference By Lisa Bard, Santa Gertrudis USA Editor The genetic advancements made in the Santa Gertrudis breed in the past 10-15 years are apparent now more than ever. At a time when some other breeds struggle, demand for Data Driven – Profit Proven Santa Gertrudis bulls and females is strong and remains so, even when the cattle cycle began its downward trend following the highs a few years ago. Santa Gertrudis has proven to be a breed whose performance is backed by data – and that is what has made the difference. At the recent 2020 International Super Sale, held March 6 during the Houston Livestock Stock Show and Rodeo, Leachman Cattle of Colorado (LCoC) bought the pick of the Schuster Farms ET calf crop and then, in partnership with Shuster Farms, bought the pick of embryo transfer (ET) calves from Quail Valley Farms. For one of the leading seedstock bull producers in the nation to invest in Santa Gertrudis genetics is no minor thing. Annually, LCoC markets more than 2,000 bulls, including Angus, Red Angus, Stabilizer composites (with both black and red lines) and Charolais. Approximately 2.5 years ago, they started to incorporate Brangus into the black Stabilizer line and have been looking for ways to add Bos indicus genetics to the red Stabilizer line. Lee Leachman, LCoC CEO, acknowledges that they have been investigating ways to incorporate Santa Gertrudis into their breeding program for quite some time. This year, with confidence that the breed and breeders are moving forward, the tipping point came. Leachman was very encouraged by a group of cattle in the International Super Sale offering that were substantially better than the mean in terms of their expected progeny differences (EPDs) – and they decided to jump in.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs
    Guidelines For Uniform Beef Improvement Programs Ninth Edition “To develop cooperation among all segments of the beef industry in the compilation and utilization of performance records to improve efficiency, profitability and sustainability of beef production.” First Edition 1970 Second Edition 1972 Third Edition 1976 Forth Edition 1981 Fifth Edition 1986 Sixth Edition 1990 Seventh Edition 1996 Eighth Edition 2002 Ninth Edition 2010 Guidelines is a publication of the Beef Improvement Federation, Joe Cassady, Executive Director, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7621, Raleigh, NC 27695 www.beefimprovement.org CONTRIBUTORS Editors Larry V. Cundiff, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, L. Dale Van Vleck, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA and the University of Nebraska William D. Hohenboken, Virginia Tech Chapter 1, Introduction Ronnie Silcox, University of Georgia Chapter 2, Breeding Herd Evaluation Bill Bowman, American Angus Association Bruce Golden, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lowell Gould, Denton, Texas Robert Hough, Red Angus Association of America Kenda Ponder, Red Angus Association of America Robert E. Williams, American International Charolais Association Lauren Hyde, North American Limousin Foundation Chapter 3, Animal Evaluation Denny Crews, Colorado State University Michael Dikeman, Kansas State University Sally L. Northcutt, American Angus Association Dorian Garrick, Iowa State University Twig T. Marston, University of Nebraska Michael MacNeil, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Lab., ARS, USDA, Larry W. Olson, Clemson University Joe C. Paschal, Texas A&M University Gene Rouse, Iowa State University Bob Weaber, University of Missouri Tommy Wheeler, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Steven Shackelford, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full
    SY-4-2 THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF MULTI-BREED COMPOSITES FOR COMMERCIAL BEEF PRODUCTION' El desarrollo y uso de compuestos de multi-casta para la produccion commercial de ganado vacuno de came Thomas J. MARLOWE* UNITED STATES INTRODUCTION Combining breeds for commercial beef production is not new to the beef industry in America. Perhaps the first composite developed in the U.S. was the American Brah­ man breed which was an amalgamation of several breeds of cattle from India. This was followed by the development of the Santa Gertrudis breed (5/8 Shorthorn and 3/8 Brah­ man) by the King Ranch in Southern Texas during the 1920’s and 1930’s. Santa Gertrudis was the first truly American breed of beef cattle. During the 40’s and 50’s several other composites were formed by combining either two (Brangus, Braford, Charbray) or three (Beefmaster-Brahman x Hereford x Shorthorn, Hays Converter-Brown Swiss, Hereford and Holstein) breeds. A little known four-breed composite was started in 1942 by F. N. Bard of Kirkland, Arizona, known as Barzona. Although crossbreeding of cattle for beef production has been practiced in the U.S. on a small scale for more than 50 years, it did not become widespread, except in the Gulf Coast area, until the 1970’s. When I came to Virginia in 1954, only 2.3% of the feeder calves sold through the organized state sales were crossbreds and they sold at a considerable disadvantage (10%). By 1970, crossbred calves had climbed to only 12%, whereas at present they account for 50% of all calves sold through the state graded sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeds of Beef and Multi-Purpose Cattle
    BREEDS OF BEEF AND MULTI-PURPOSE CATTLE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The inspiration for writing this book goes back to my undergraduate student days at Iowa State University when I enrolled in the course, “Breeds of Livestock,” taught by the late Dr. Roy Kottman, who was then the Associate Dean of Agriculture for Undergraduate Instruction. I was also inspired by my livestock judging team coach, Professor James Kiser, who took us to many great livestock breeders’ farms for practice judging workouts. I also wish to acknowledge the late Dr. Ronald H. Nelson, former Chairman of the Department of Animal Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Nelson offered me an Instructorship position in 1957 to pursue an advanced degree as well as teach a number of undergraduate courses, including “Breeds of Livestock.” I enjoyed my work so much that I never left, and remained at Michigan State for my entire 47-year career in Animal Science. During this career, I had an opportunity to judge shows involving a significant number of the breeds of cattle reviewed in this book. I wish to acknowledge the various associations who invited me to judge their shows and become acquainted with their breeders. Furthermore, I want to express thanks to my spouse, Dr. Leah Cox Ritchie, for her patience while working on this book, and to Ms. Nancy Perkins for her expertise in typing the original manuscript. I also want to acknowledge the late Dr. Hilton Briggs, the author of the textbook, “Modern Breeds of Livestock.” I admired him greatly and was honored to become his close friend in the later years of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brahman - a Unique American Breed
    Serving the Bos indicus Cattle Industry of America | April 2014 | $4.00 The Brahman - A Unique American Breed THE EAR APRIL 2014 | 1 This month’s edition of The Ear is focused on the American Brahman breed, which in my opinion, is the most unique of all the American breeds (I might take a little heat on that but I think you will understand). However, cattle breeds are not just made of cattle, they have to have breeders and usu- ally some sort of breed association or regis- Columns try to keep track of pedigrees and promote the breed. The American Brahman Breed- 4 Have You Heard...the Truth ers Association the oldest of the American breed registries (1924) and the members of 8 The Science of Bos inducus the association are exceptional promoters of their breed nationally and internationally. It The Bottom Line 8 is a breed that was designed to produce in a 16 pretty specific not too friendly to cattle envi- ronment (tropical). I appreciate the opportunity to address you in this special Brahman Feature. The Brah- Features man breed was created over 100 years ago A Message for ABBA’s out of necessity by cattlemen along the Gulf 12 Coast to survive the harsh environment, in- Executive Vice President sects and diseases. With the incorporation Preventing Disease via of the imported Indian cattle, producers 18 saw increases in growth, production and Nutrition is Going to be adaptability. Due to these improvements More Important than Ever there was a widespread acceptance of the breed and as a result a group of forward thinking cattlemen developed the breed and began the American Brahman Breeders Association in 1924 to maintain the records Departments 12 of the cattle 20 Beefmaster Headlines Generally, we refer to ourselves as “ranch- 24 Braford Headlines ers” since we often spend 15 to 20 hours per day doing some form of livestock han- 26 Brahman Headlines dling activity, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Breeds
    EAN-002 11/14 Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle VI: Creating Breeds Figure 1. Robert Bakewell, circa 1775, English pioneer creator of breeds of livestock. Stephen P. Hammack* hat is a breed? A typical dictionary defini- has had about 75 cattle breed registries for some time; new tion is “a race of animals which have some ones appear and others disappear. In some cases, the cattle in Wdistinctive qualities in common.” One text- two or more registries are the same or essentially the same. book definition is “animals more closely related and alike The only actions needed to start a registry are to adopt in appearance than random members of the species.” In specific requirements of eligibility and start recording a recent scientific paper, the authors stated “we use breed ancestry. Although those requirements vary considerably and population interchangeably, due to the different defi- and may not be very stringent, having a registry could be nitions of breed worldwide.” considered to constitute a breed. In 1999, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations adopted the following broad definition: In spite of what many think, the U.S. Department of Agriculture does not “recognize” the validity of breeds. Either 1) a subspecific group of domestic livestock with The Canadian government division of agriculture does definable and identifiable external characteristics that enable it to be separated by visual appraisal from other *Professor and Extension Beef Cattle Specialist–Emeritus, The Texas A&M University similarly defined groups within the same species, or 2) a System group for which geographical and/or cultural separation from phenotypically similar groups has lead to acceptance of its separate identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Judging
    4H ASJ 20.2 (formerly SP AJL 20) Livestock Judging A 4-H Animal Science Project Activity 2, Different Strokes CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 4-H LIVESTOCK JUDGING was developed through a team effort with the Florida -4 H Youth Development Program, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, and the Department of Animal Science, The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. This edition of the Livestock Judging curriculum package was created by Chad Carr, Assistant Professor, Justin Crosswhite, Graduate Assistant, and Amanda Johnson, Undergraduate Assistant, Department of Animal Sciences. Authors of previous editions include: Julie Sexton and Karen Strickland, former Project Assistants, Allen Stateler, former Graduate Assistants; Saundra TenBroeck, Associate Professor and Youth Livestock Extension Specialist, Department of Animal Sciences, Tim Marshall, Associate Professor, Department of Animal Sciences and Deborah J. Glauer, Extension Youth Development Specialist and Animal Science Design Team Leader, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences. Technical review and assistance for this edition was provided by members of the -4 H Life Skills Animal Science Action Team—Amanda Thein, Nassau County -4 H Agent, Chris DeCubelis, Gilchrist County 4-H Agent, and Joy C. Jordan, Associate Professor a/4-H Youth Development Curriculum Specialist, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. ______________________________ An Equal Opportunity Institution. UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension. Information on copies for purchase is available from IFAS Extension Bookstore, University of Florida, PO Box 110011, Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (visit our website at: ifasbooks.ufl.edu).
    [Show full text]
  • The Upgmding of Beef Cattle on the Great Plains
    THE UPGMDING OF BEEF CATTLE ON THE GREAT PLAINS Lauren C. Post San Diego State College Beef cattle are a dominant feature in the geographical landscape of the Great Plains. Whether considered from the economic or cultural or any other aspect of geography, they and their breeds should be of interest. Even the most casual geographer can distinguish between the Longhorns, which were used in greatest numbers to populate the area, and the highly uni­ form white-faced Herefords, which dominate the cattle industry there as well as elsewhere in the western United States. Man willfully and purposely changed the entire cattle population of the Great Plains so completely that today one can find a Longhorn only in a park or a museum. Actually there are fewer real Longhorns in the United States today than there are buffalo. The change from the Long­ horns and the so-called "native" or "common" cattle to the modern British breeds is the theme of this paper. But to say that it was merely a change from Longhorns to Herefords would be great over-simplification. It really is a very complicated story, one that goes back several centuries, and one that requires more background than factual statement from within the area.1 Since cattle were not native to the New World, all cattle of concern in this paper necessarily had to come from the Old World. Spanish cattle were introduced into the West Indies, from whence they were taken to Mexico and Florida. From Florida some Spanish cattle spread to nearby areas in the southeastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2022 Rulebook
    2022 RULEBOOK Table of Contents Goat……………………………………………………………..………. 24 ● Market Goats…………………………………...……………...........25 ● Breeding Does….……………………………………………..…….29 ● Wether Dam Does….……………………………………………….33 ● Goat Showmanship….………………………………………...……37 ● Doe Fitting Contest….………………………………………..…….39 ● Champions’ Tribute….………………………………………..……42 Sheep….………………………………………………………………….45 ● Market Lamb….…………………………………………………….46 ● Breeding Ewes….……………………………………………..……51 ● Sheep Showmanship….……………………………………….……57 Swine….……………………………....………………………………….59 ● Market Barrows….………………………………………………60 ● Breeding Gilt….………………………………………………….66 ● Swine Showmanship….………………………………………….73 Cattle….…………………………………………………………….……75 ● Market Steer….………………………………………….………….76 ● Breeding Heifer….………………………………………………….83 ● Commercial Heifer….……………………………………….…….105 ● Cattle Showmanship….……………………………………...……107 ● Fitting Contest….………………………………………………….109 ● Futurity Heifer and Steer Sale….……………………………….....112 ● Pre-junior Miniature Hereford Steer Show….…………………….115 ● Pre-junior Miniature Hereford Heifer Show………………………117 Agriculture Mechanics….………………………………………..……..119 2 Changes, Reminders & Important Dates Changes Cattle Show Changes: Heifer Show Schedule Heifer show schedules have changed to better use facilities and to better accommodate exhibitors. FRIDAY, MARCH 11 3:00-4:00pm Breeding Heifer check-in – Barn 8A American Aberdeen, Beefmaster, Brahman, Brangus, Dexter, Gelbvieh, Mini Hereford, Salers 5:00pm Breeding Heifer check-in – Barn 8A Charolais, Limousin SATURDAY, MARCH 12 8:00am LNC Other Registered
    [Show full text]
  • By Harlan Ritchie BREEDS of BEEF and MULTI-PURPOSE CATTLE
    2009 By Harlan Ritchie BREEDS OF BEEF AND MULTI-PURPOSE CATTLE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The inspiration for writing this book goes back to my undergraduate student days at Iowa State University when I enrolled in the course, “Breeds of Livestock,” taught by the late Dr. Roy Kottman, who was then the Associate Dean of Agriculture for Undergraduate Instruction. I was also inspired by my livestock judging team coach, Professor James Kiser, who took us to many great livestock breeders’ farms for practice judging workouts. I also wish to acknowledge the late Dr. Ronald H. Nelson, former Chairman of the Department of Animal Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Nelson offered me an Instructorship position in 1957 to pursue an advanced degree as well as teach a number of undergraduate courses, including “Breeds of Livestock.” I enjoyed my work so much that I never left, and remained at Michigan State for my entire 47-year career in Animal Science. During this career, I had an opportunity to judge shows involving a significant number of the breeds of cattle reviewed in this book. I wish to acknowledge the various associations who invited me to judge their shows and become acquainted with their breeders. Furthermore, I want to express thanks to my spouse, Dr. Leah Cox Ritchie, for her patience while working on this book, and to Ms. Nancy Perkins for her expertise in typing the original manuscript. I also want to acknowledge the late Dr. Hilton Briggs, the author of the textbook, “Modern Breeds of Livestock.” I admired him greatly and was honored to become his close friend in the later years of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 STATE FAIR of TEXAS® EXHIBITOR HANDBOOK 2017 State Fair of Texas® September 29-October 22, 2017
    SEPT. 29 - OCT. 22, 2017 TO LEARN MORE VISIT OUR WEBSITE WWW.BIGTEX.COM 2017 STATE FAIR OF TEXAS® EXHIBITOR HANDBOOK 2017 State Fair of Texas® September 29-October 22, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIVESTOCK SCHEDULE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...5 GENERAL INFORMATION AND RULES…………………………………………………………………………………………..11 ANIMAL HEALTH RULES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………....20 PAN-AMERICAN, BEEF CATTLE……………………………………………………………………………………………………... Angus………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….24 Beefmaster……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………26 Brahman………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………28 Brangus……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….32 Hereford……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………34 Longhorn……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..36 Miniature Hereford…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..38 Pre Junior Miniature Hereford………………………………………………………………………………..……………..40 Miniature Zebu………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..42 Polled Hereford……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….44 Red Angus…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….46 Red Brangus………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….48 Santa Gertrudis…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…50 Shorthorn……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...54 Simbrah………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..56 Simmental……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..58 PAN-AMERICAN, DAIRY CATTLE……………………………………………………………………………………………………. Rules…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..60 All Breeds……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..64
    [Show full text]