DOCSLIB.ORG

LONGLISTS ANNOUNCED: the ORWELL PRIZE for JOURNALISM 2017 Embargoed Until 00:00HRS, Thursday 16Th March 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LONGLISTS ANNOUNCED: the ORWELL PRIZE for JOURNALISM 2017 Embargoed Until 00:00HRS, Thursday 16Th March 2017 LONGLISTS ANNOUNCED: THE ORWELL PRIZE FOR JOURNALISM 2017 Embargoed until 00:00HRS, Thursday 16th March 2017 Longlists for the Orwell Prize for Journalism 2017, Britain’s most prestigious prize for political writing, were announced today. At a time when George Orwell’s name has returned to the heart of political discourse, the Orwell Prize judges select the year’s best political journalism 14 journalists longlisted for the Orwell Prize for Journalism List includes comment and reportage, from Economist editor Zanny Minton Beddoes to the Guardian’s migration correspondent Patrick Kingsley Six new names, alongside five former Orwell Prize shortlistees and three longlistees, are longlisted Entrants submitted a maximum of six articles, and are listed alongside the titles written for in their entries. The Longlist for the Orwell Prize for Journalism 2017 is; Ian Birrell (Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, The i Paper/The Independent, The Guardian) Rosie Blau (The Economist) Carole Cadwalladr (The Observer) Aditya Chakrabortty (The Guardian) Nick Cohen (Standpoint, The Observer) John Harris (The Guardian) David Hayes (Inside Story) Patrick Kingsley (The Guardian, The Observer) Anthony Lloyd (The Times, The New Statesman) Zanny Minton Beddoes (The Economist) Douglas Murray (The Spectator, The Sunday Times) Sarah O’Connor (Financial Times) Fintan O’Toole (The Irish Times, The Guardian, The Observer) Paul Wood (The Spectator, Harper’s) The judges for the Orwell Prize for Journalism 2017 are Dame Liz Forgan, Alan Little and former winner of the Orwell Prize Francis Wheen. Shortlists for the Orwell Prize for Journalism will be announced at a special lecture with Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson on Monday 15th May 2017, along with the Orwell Prizes for Books and for Exposing Britain’s Social Evils. The winner of each £3000 prize will be announced at a ceremony during UCL’s Festival of Culture on Thursday 8th June 2017. Previous winners of the Orwell Prize for Journalism include Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Peter Hitchens and Andrew Norfolk. The Orwell Prize for Journalism 2016 was shared by Iona Craig (freelance) and Gideon Rachman (Financial Times). For more information, and images, please contact Jeremy Wikeley at [email protected] or on 020 3108 1618 ENDS 1. The Orwell Prize is Britain’s most prestigious prize for political writing and a registered charity (number 1161563), providing free cultural events and resources for the public benefit. Every year, three prizes are awarded to the work which comes closest to George Orwell’s ambition ‘to make political writing into an art’: the Orwell Prize for Books, Journalism and Exposing Britain’s Social Evils. 2. The Prize was founded by the late Professor Sir Bernard Crick in its present form in 1993, awarding its first prizes in 1994. The Prize is supported by Political Quarterly, Richard Blair (Orwell’s son) and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 3. The Orwell Prize is based at UCL’s Institute of Advanced Studies. For more information about the Institute of Advanced Studies and its activities, please see https://www.ucl.ac.uk/institute-of-advanced-studies 4. The Orwell Prize for Britain’s Social Evils 2017 is for work published in the calendar year 2016. For full details and rules of entry please see our website. 5. The Orwell Prize for Journalism 2017 received 82 entries. 32% of entries were women. 29% of the longlisted entrants are women. 6. Each winner receives £3000 and a trophy designed and made by students at Goldsmiths, University of London. 7. For further information, please contact Jeremy Wikeley at [email protected] or call on 020 3108 1618 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Longlist Announced: the Orwell Prize for Books 2018
    LONGLIST ANNOUNCED: THE ORWELL PRIZE FOR BOOKS 2018 EMBARGOED UNTIL 00:01HRS, TUESDAY 10TH APRIL 2018 The longlist for The Orwell Prize for Books 2018, Britain’s most prestigious prize for political writing, is announced today. • Twelve books longlisted for The Orwell Prize for Books 2018. • Following a year in which George Orwell’s name continues to occupy the heart of political discourse, the Orwell Prize judges choose the most compelling political writing of 2017 • Books on Islam and the Russian revolution are longlisted alongside a novel spun around Brexit, and social commentary around gender, race and immigration • This diverse list includes first-time authors such as Reni Eddo-Lodge and Darren McGarvey as well as established political writers including David Goodhart and Mark Mazower • The longlist features historical writing, fiction and for the first time a graphic novel. The Orwell Prize for Books 2018 longlist (see below for notes): • The Islamic Enlightenment: The Modern Struggle Between Faith and Reason, Christopher de Bellaigue (Bodley Head) • Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People about Race, Reni Eddo-Lodge (Bloomsbury) • Threads from the Refugee Crisis, Kate Evans (Verso) • Testosterone Rex, Cordelia Fine (Icon Books) • The Road to Somewhere - The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics, David Goodhart (Hurst Publishers) • What You Did Not Tell, Mark Mazower (Allen Lane) • Poverty Safari, Darren McGarvey (Luath Press) • Age of Anger: A History of the Present, Pankaj Mishra (Allen Lane) • Bitch Doctrine, Laurie Penny (Bloomsbury) Bread for All: • The Origins of the Welfare State, Chris Renwick (Allen Lane) • Winter, Ali Smith (Hamish Hamilton) • Lovers and Strangers: An Immigrant History of Post-War Britain, Clair Wills (Allen Lane) The judges for the Orwell Prize for Books are politician, academic and journalist Andrew Adonis (Chair), Literary Journalist and Artistic Director of Words and Literature of the Bath Festival, Alex Clark, author Kit de Waal, and Lorien Kite, Deputy Life & Arts Editor for the Financial Times.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcelo Pelissioli from Allegory Into Symbol: Revisiting George Orwell's Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four in the Light Of
    MARCELO PELISSIOLI FROM ALLEGORY INTO SYMBOL: REVISITING GEORGE ORWELL’S ANIMAL FARM AND NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR IN THE LIGHT OF 21 ST CENTURY VIEWS OF TOTALITARIANISM PORTO ALEGRE 2008 2 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL INSTITUTO DE LETRAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM LETRAS ÊNFASE: LITERATURAS DE LÍNGUA INGLESA LINHA DE PESQUISA: LITERATURA, IMAGINÁRIO E HISTÓRIA FROM ALLEGORY INTO SYMBOL: REVISITING GEORGE ORWELL’S ANIMAL FARM AND NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR IN THE LIGHT OF 21 ST CENTURY VIEWS OF TOTALITARIANISM MESTRANDO: PROF. MARCELO PELISSIOLI ORIENTADORA: PROFª. DRª. SANDRA SIRANGELO MAGGIO PORTO ALEGRE 2008 3 4 PELISSIOLI, Marcelo FROM ALLEGORY INTO SYMBOL: REVISITING GEORGE ORWELL’S ANIMAL FARM AND NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR IN THE LIGHT OF 21 ST CENTURY VIEWS OF TOTALITARIANISM Marcelo Pelissioli Porto Alegre: UFRGS, Instituto de Letras, 2008. 112 p. Dissertação (Mestrado - Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras) Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. 1.Totalitarismo, 2.Animal Farm, 3. Nineteen Eighty-Four, 4. Alegoria, 5. Símbolo. 5 Acknowledgements To my dear professor and adviser Dr. Sandra Maggio, for the intellectual and motivational support; To professors Jane Brodbeck, Valéria Salomon, Vicente Saldanha, Paulo Ramos, Miriam Jardim, José Édil and Edgar Kirchof, professors who guided me to follow the way of Literature; To my bosses Antonio Daltro Costa, Gerson Costa and Mary Sieben, for their cooperation and understanding; To my friends Anderson Correa, Bruno Albo Amedei and Fernando Muniz, for their sense of companionship; To my family, especially my mother and grandmother, who always believed in my capacity; To my wife Ana Paula, who has always stayed by my side along these long years of study that culminate in the handing of this thesis; And, finally, to God, who has proved to me along the years that He really is the God of the brave.
    [Show full text]
  • David Blunkett in Defence of Politics Revisited
    blunkett,B5,coverJS,v2 28/08/2012 12:25 Page 2 David Blunkett In Defence of Politics Revisited is pamphlet is dedicated to the memory of my tutor and friend the late Professor Sir Bernard Crick who not only observed, researched and wrote about politics but in Britain and specifically in Northern Ireland, engaged as an active citizen in trying to make the world a better place. Rt. Hon. David Blunkett MP 1 Foreword by Ed Miliband, Leader of the Labour Party DavID BluNkett’S reconsideration of Bernard Crick’s defence of politics is timely. Sadly, politics needs defending in this country. Few people believe it can really change the world around them. Few believe that politicians are much different from each other. and few vote. is is not just bad for us politicians. It is bad for the country. When politics becomes an increasingly minority activity, no politician or party can gain a good mandate to make the radical changes this country needs. e biggest mistake those of us in politics can make would be to blame the voters. apathy will not be defeated by voters having a change of heart. I do not blame the voters. I think people are telling us politicians something we need to hear. Not just that this out-of-touch tory-led government has run out of ideas. But that labour – like politics in general – has a long way to go to win back trust. Our solutions start with our diagnosis of the problem. Why do people have such low faith in politics? Firstly, it is because they see politicians who make promises they do not or cannot keep.
    [Show full text]
  • Mustpoliticsdisappoint.Pdf
    The Fabian Society The Fabian Society is Britain’s leading left of centre think tank and political society, committed to creating the political ideas and policy debates which can shape the future of progressive politics. With over 300 Fabian MPs, MEPs, Peers, MSPs and AMs, the Society plays an unparalleled role in linking the ability to influence policy debates at the highest level with vigorous grassroots debate among our growing membership of over 7000 people, 70 local branches meeting regularly throughout Britain and a vibrant Young Fabian section organising its own activities. Fabian publications, events and ideas therefore reach and influence a wider audience than those of any comparable think tank. The Society is unique among think tanks in being a thriving, democratically-constituted membership organisation, affiliated to the Labour Party but organisationally and editorially independent. For over 120 years Fabians have been central to every important renewal and revision of left of centre thinking. The Fabian commitment to open and participatory debate is as important today as ever before as we explore the ideas, politics and policies which will define the next generation of progressive politics in Britain, Europe and around the world. Find out more at www.fabian-society.org.uk Fabian Society 11 Dartmouth Street London SW1H 9BN www.fabian-society.org.uk Fabian ideas Series editor: Jonathan Heawood First published March 2005 ISBN 0 7163 0614 X ISSN 1746-1146 This pamphlet, like all publications of the Fabian Society, represents not the collective views of the Society but only the views of the author. The responsibility of the Society is limited to approving its publications as worthy of consideration within the Labour movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The „Orwell-1984-Award“ Honoring the Champions of Responsible & Democratic Data Usage and Protection in a Global Society
    The „Orwell-1984-Award“ Honoring the Champions of Responsible & Democratic Data Usage and Protection in a Global Society A Call for Funding an Award for Publications in the Defense of Democracy, Basic Rights, Privacy, Data Security and Protection Short information: This is a call in search of support for funding an award the objective of which is to appreciate the discourse and its authors on today’s “Orwellian-1984” tendencies in terms of publications or media productions. Different from other Big Brother awards, the purpose of this prize is not to identify phenomena serving as proofs for Big Brother developments, rather than to honor profound and intelligent discussions on such phenomena through publications (articles, books, film, media…). „Written in 1948, „1984“ was George Orwell's chilling prophecy about the future. While 1984 has come and gone, Orwell's narrative is timelier that ever. 1984 presents a "negative utopia", that is at once a startling and haunting vision of the world — so powerful that it's completely convincing from start to finish. No one can deny the power of this novel, its hold on the imaginations of entire generations of readers, or the resiliency of its admonitions — a legacy that seems to grow, not lessen, with the passage of time.” Quoted from http://www.goodreads.com/ on Orwell's 1984 The Internet of Things, Big Data, the Cloud, the Social Media, Mobile Communications, Cyber- currency and similar concepts are profoundly changing the structure and texture of our lives, be it in business, in education, in government or in our communities. Individual primacy may soon become a thing of the past if we fail to understand these new dynamics and rebuild our societies so that trust and openness are maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizenship Education: a Case Study of Curriculum Policy
    Citizenship Education: A Case Study of Curriculum Policy PhD thesis submitted by Lee Paul Jerome Institute of Education, University of London, 2012 Abstract In this thesis I argue that citizenship education was one of a range of domestic policies through which New Labour politicians imagined and sought to create the ideal citizen. It follows that in order to fully understand what happened to citizenship education policy under New Labour, it is essential to assess it within the broader political context. This is the first study to explore the connections between the political context of New Labour, the model of citizenship education which was promoted and the provision that developed in schools. Whilst most analyses of this area have characterised the policy as essentially communitarian, I argue that the model of citizenship education was broadly civic republican in character. I discuss the model and the tensions within it by considering (i) rights and responsibilities, (ii) active citizenship and (iii) community and diversity. I argue that the tensions in policy have often been replicated, rather than resolved, at school level. I have sought to understand the implementation of citizenship education policy from the top down and from the bottom up. The top down account draws on previously published national surveys and the bottom up story is told through an in-depth case study of a single school. The school case study was constructed in collaboration with a group of student co-researchers, which provides a distinctive methodological perspective and an insight into how Citizenship has been experienced by young people. Whilst the policy has failed to achieve all that was intended, there are important lessons to learn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aesthetics of Contingency: Contesting
    THE AESTHETICS OF CONTINGENCY: CONTESTING LITERARY MODERNITY IN THE 1930S AND BEYOND A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sonam Singh May 2012 © 2012 Sonam Singh THE AESTHETICS OF CONTINGENCY: CONTESTING LITERARY MODERNITY IN THE 1930S AND BEYOND Sonam Singh, Ph.D. Cornell University 2012 This dissertation explores the aesthetics and ethics of attempts to formalize and coordinate modern—i.e., disenchanted, antagonistic, contingent—understandings of the self and the social, the sexual and the political. In Part One, “Coordinating Private and Public Contingencies,” I delineate an intellectual genealogy of attempts by cultural and social theorists to account for a modern recognition of the self and society as both riven by innate internal antagonisms and both subject to anarchic contingencies in development. I focus on Marx’s and Baudelaire’s resonant reflections on the popular failure of the 1848 revolution in France, and sketch an ensuing aesthetic-theoretical tradition of reading literary forms as cognate with and offering insights into the ideological totalizations of social and political forms. In Part Two, “The Resistance to Contingency,” I critique the content and critical reception of Walter Benjamin’s highly influential dismissals, on supposedly progressive political grounds, of Baudelaire’s aesthetic and ethical insights, grounding my analysis in a comparative reading of Benjamin’s transcendental historical schemas in his political work against Baudelaire’s decidedly immanent ones in his lyrics. In Part Three, “Contingency and/as Liberty,” I explore this congruence of political and literary aesthetics further in an analysis of three George Orwell novels.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting Totalitarianism: Nineteen Eighty-Four in Film Adaptations
    Adapting totalitarianism: Nineteen Eighty-Four in Film Adaptations (Schaefer) Bachelor Thesis English Language and Culture, Utrecht University Student: Laura Kouters Student number: 3909670 Supervisor: Dr. Roselinde Supheert Second reader: Dr. Barnita Bagchi Date of completion: January 2015 2 Table of Contents Introduction pg. 3 1. Totalitarianism in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four pg. 6 2. The Torture Scene pg. 9 3. Room 101 pg. 16 4. Symbolical Ideology pg. 20 1. Clothing pg. 20 2. Big Brother pg. 24 3. Technology pg. 25 Conclusion pg. 29 Appendix pg. 31 Works Cited pg. 39 3 Introduction After reading Russian author Yevgeny Zamyatin’s revolutionary dystopian work We (1921), British author Eric Arthur Blair began work on his own interpretation of a dystopian world, tentatively called The Last Man in Europe, and eventually published it as Nineteen Eighty- Four on 8 June 1949 under his pen name George Orwell (McCrum). Reviews of that time reveal an instant critical acclaim (Meyers), with British critic V.S. Pritchett stating that “I do not think I have ever read a novel more frightening and depressing; and yet, such are the originality, the suspense, the speed of writing and withering indignation that it is impossible to put the book down” (Pritchett). The New York Times review of 12th of June 1949 mentions that while “[it] is a great work of kinetic1 art,” it also “may mean that its greatness is only immediate, its power for us alone, now, in this generation, this decade, this year, that it is doomed to be the pawn of time.” Fortunately, this prophesy of immediate greatness has been firmly dismantled.
    [Show full text]
  • Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools
    Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools Final report of the Advisory Group on Citizenship 22 September 1998 The Young People’s Parliament, Birmingham, (YPP) – Educating for Democracy – gives young people in Birmingham and the West Midlands a voice - whether on school, local quality of life or wider national issues; and on global concerns such as sustainable development and human rights. The initiative is a partnership between The University of the First Age, Birmingham City Council and the new centre for learning and leisure, Millennium Point. Already by using ICT, websites, video conferencing and e-mail, as well as use of the City’s Council Chamber, the young people of Birmingham and beyond have been able to participate in two pilot projects. The General Election project in 1997 linked young people in the West Midlands directly with politicians and provided a lively and robust exchange of views. The first G8 Young People’s Summit (YPS) was held in May 1998 to coincide with the G8 Summit meeting in Birmingham. Two youth delegates came from each of the G8 countries as well as the EU. A communiqué was drafted, mainly on the issues of third world debt relief, after a meeting with the Prime Minister. It made a powerful statement for the right of young people to be heard in international affairs. The Youth Parliament Competition is now in its eighth year, organised by the Citizenship Foundation and sponsored by Motorola. Each participating secondary school holds a mock parliamentary session of the pupils’ own choosing. There are ministers and shadow ministers and a host of backbenchers on both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Nineteen Eighty-Four: Doublespeak in a Post-Orwellian Age
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 311 451 CS 212 095 AUTHOR Lutz, William, Ed. TITLE Beyond Nineteen Eighty-Four: Doublespeak in a Post-Orwellian Age. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-0285-9 PUB DATE 89 NOTE 222p. AVAILABLE FROMNational Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 02859-3020; $12.95 member, $15.95 nonmember). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Collected Works - General (020) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Deception; English; Language Role; *Language Usage; Linguistics; *Persuasive Discourse; *Propaganda IDENTIFIERS *Doublespeak; Jargon; Orwell (George) ABSTRACT This book probes the efforts at manipulation individuals face daily in this information age and the tactics of persuaders from many sectors of society using various forms of Orwellian "doublespeak." The book contains the following essays: (1) "Notes toward a Definition of Doublespeak" (William Lutz); (2) "Truisms Are True: Orwell's View of Language" (Walker Gibson); (3) "Mr. Orwell, Mr. Schlesinger, and the Language" (Hugh Rank); (4) "What Dc We Know?" (Charles Weingartner); (5) "The Dangers of Singlespeak" (Edward M. White); (6) "The Fallacies of Doublespeak" (Dennis Rohatyn); (7) "Doublespeak and Ethics" (George R. Bramer); (8) "Post-Orwellian Refinements of Doublethink: Will the Real Big Brother Please Stand Up?" (Donald Lazere); (9) "Worldthink" (Richard Ohmann); (10) "'Bullets Hurt, Corpses Stink': George Orwell and the Language of Warfare" (Harry Brent); (11) "Political Language: The Art of Saying Nothing" (Dan F. Hahn); (12) "Fiddle-Faddle, Flapdoodle, and Balderdash: Some Thoughts about Jargon" (Frank J. D'Angelo); (13) "How to Read an Ad: Learning to Read between the Lies" (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Assistant Project Coordinator Hours: 4 Days Per Week Contract Type: 9 Months Fixed-Term Contract from April – January 2019 Salary: £21,000 Pro Rata
    Assistant Project Coordinator Hours: 4 days per week Contract type: 9 months fixed-term contract from April – January 2019 Salary: £21,000 pro rata THE ROLE The Orwell Foundation is looking for a part-time Assistant Project Coordinator to support the development and delivery of The Orwell Foundation and Orwell Youth Prize’s programmes of activity. This is a vital role supporting in the delivery of The Orwell Youth Prize programme, including school and regional workshops and our Celebration Day at Pembroke College Oxford as well as coordinating elements of The Orwell Foundation’s output such as our annual lecture and administration of The Orwell Prizes. This role will be predominantly based in our office at the Institute of Advanced Studies, University College London but days will be flexible at times and may include and weekend work and travel. JOB DESCRIPTION The Assistant Project Coordinator will be responsible for: • Administration of The Orwell Youth Prize entry process, liaising with entrants and judges and acting as the main point of contact on the prize • Coordinating Orwell Youth Prize workshops. This will involve recruitment of participants, coordination of universities and schools, writers and stakeholders, and working closely with the Delivery Director and Programmes Managers to successfully deliver our workshop programme • Delivering The Orwell Youth Prize Celebration Day at Pembroke College, Oxford, including liaising with participants, parents and other key stakeholders, preparing and collating documentation and evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • The Orwell Youth Prize Annual Report 2016
    THE ORWELL YOUTH PRIZE ‘What I have most wanted to do...is to make political writing into an art’ Annual Report 2015 - 2016 THE ORWELL YOUTH PRIZE The Orwell Youth Prize aims to inspire and support the next generation of politically engaged young writers. Orwell’s values of integrity, truthfulness and fairness are an ideal foundation to introduce young people to the power of language. His writings resonate with the young who can relate his focus on justice and deprivation to their own experience. So much more than just a prize, The Orwell Youth Prize offers young people a journey that progresses through workshops provoking debate, to hearing from writers about the tools for effective communication. It is a catalyst for young people to write about what they think and what they see, receiving feedback from mentors and peers. Students from all backgrounds have an opportunity to discover and develop their talents and abilities beyond the curriculum: and for those who want to change the world The Orwell Youth Prize offers a platform where their voice, through their writing, can influence power. Focusing on 13 – 18 year olds, there are three strands: WORKSHOPS IN SCHOOLS THE WRITING PRIZE THE CELEBRATION DAY We run workshops in schools We run a prize for writing in any The celebration day is an event (the majority of which have a high form: entries in 2015 included for everyone that enters the percentage pupil premium), led reports, poems, stories and Writing Prize. In addition to the by an experienced teacher and plays. To ensure that the Writing prize-giving ceremony, the day is incorporating a writer or journalist.
    [Show full text]