Danish Emergency Management Agency | National Risk Profile for Denmark National Risk Profile for Denmark
Nationalt Risikobillede
1 National Risk Profile for Denmark | Danish Emergency Management Agency
Published by: The Danish Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) Datavej 16 DK-3460 Birkerød, Denmark Tel.: 45 90 60 00 Fax: 45 90 60 60 E-mail: [email protected] www.brs.dk
ISBN 978-87-91590-88-7 Date of publication: April 2018
Translated from the original Danish language version “Nationalt Risikobillede” (ISBN 978-87-91590-82-5)
Cover illustration: Eske Kath, Blow Up, 2007, acrylic on canvas, 195×258 cm. © Eske Kath and Galerie Mikael Andersen, Copenhagen.
2 Danish Emergency Management Agency | National Risk Profile for Denmark
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION Objectives 5 Central Concepts 5 Process 6 Structure 7
PART ONE: INCIDENT TYPES 1. Hurricanes and Strong Storms 14 2. Coastal Flooding 22 3. Extreme Rainfall 32 4. Highly Virulent Diseases 42 5. Animal Diseases 52 6. Water and Foodborne Diseases 62 7. Nuclear Accidents 72 8. Accidents Involving Chemical Agents 80 9. Maritime Accidents 90 10. Transport Accidents 100 11. Cyber Incidents 110 12. Terrorist Acts 120 13. Space Weather 130
PART TWO: TRENDS I. Security Policy Tensions 142 II. Antibiotic Resistance 146 III. Irregular Migration 150 IV. Increased Activity in the Arctic Region 154
3 Preface National Risk Profile for Denmark | Danish Emergency Management Agency
I am delighted to present the second edition of the National Risk Profile. A lot has happened since the Preface Danish Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) published the National Risk Profile for the first time well over three years ago. The product sparked a great deal of interest and became widely used. In Denmark, a wide range of authorities and The time is now ripe for an updated version, and organisations help to ensure the safe, smooth in this edition we have concentrated on providing running of society. It is not without reason that we readers with an even deeper understanding of the can enjoy a good general level of health, a stable incident types and the challenges they present in supply network and a reliable infrastructure. Even terms of overall emergency management. in our society, however, major accidents and disasters do occur, and we need to have effective This publication draws attention to 13 incident emergency management in place to deal with types. Common for all is that an exceptionally them. comprehensive and cross-cutting effort is required in order for society to effectively manage While some of the incidents that befall us are the situation. The National Risk Profile thus well-known, there are others about which we know provides a common frame of reference for acute less. Only rarely are we completely surprised by risks of broad societal relevance, and can form an incident that falls outside of what we had part of the foundation for emergency imagined possible. When preparing to deal with management planning within the national crisis extraordinary incidents, it makes sense to start management system as well as in and many other with the risks that we know are present. We must contexts. In some instances it can even serve as never allow ourselves to be thrown off balance by the starting point for a further planning process these. In preparing for the known, we also gain regarding more specific circumstances. The risk skills and capacities that could also prove useful to profile cannot, however, stand alone. Rather, it us the next time something new and unexpected needs to be challenged and considered in the occurs. context in which the readers find themselves.
At the same time, it is important to remember that risks change over time. In this edition, we have chosen to expand the risk profile by adding four trends that may affect emergency management in the slightly longer term. In this way, the National Risk Profile draws up the risk landscape in Denmark both now and in the coming years. First and foremost, it should be seen as an invitation to plan, collaborate, and share knowledge when it comes to our society’s emergency management capacities. This way, the National Risk Profile will help promote a solid emergency management culture in Denmark.
I hope you will both enjoy and make good use of this document.
Henning Thiesen Director General, Danish Emergency Management Agency (DEMA)
4 Danish Emergency Management Agency | National Risk Profile for Denmark Introduction
In addition to the objectives of the publication listed above, the NRP also meets the requirement INTRODUCTION of the European Civil Protection Mechanism (EU Council Decision No. 1313/2013/EU of 17 December 2013), stating that member states must develop risk assessments at national or Objectives appropriate subnational level’. DEMA continuously seeks to keep abreast of, highlight and disseminate knowledge about the risks that may lead to major accidents and Central Concepts This edition of the NRP consists of two main parts. disasters in Denmark. This work involves The first part contains 13 chapters, each of which gathering information that can tell us about the describes one incident type. The order in which characteristics and causal connections of these are presented does not imply any form of individual risks, the current overall state of the risk ranking. The incident types differ in essence and it picture, and how this risk picture may develop in is not, therefore, possible to list them in any the future. meaningful order of priority. It will, however, be possible to compare them against each other Some risks are relatively easy to identify and based on a range of parameters presented in each monitor as they regularly manifest themselves as chapter. incidents or are generally the subject of great attention. In other cases, a certain amount of The other main part contains four trends, which in imagination is required to detect new risks, or the longer term could prove to have an impact on new ways in which familiar risks may develop. The the risk profile for Denmark. These trends are not National Risk Profile (NRP) is a periodic summary ranked in any order, nor is it implied that the list of the continuous work being conducted to map is an exhaustive one. The trends serve to identify and analyse the risks that society is facing. some of the sources of change to the risk profile over the coming years. The NRP does not, however, represent the entire spectrum of risks faced by Danish society or the What is Risk? citizens of Denmark. Rather, it concentrates on The term ‘risk’ is used in many contexts, often with those risks considered by DEMA to merit the most various intended meanings. In colloquial attention from society’s emergency management language, it is sometimes used synonymously actors. with either ‘likelihood’ or ‘consequence’. In other connections – for example, when talking about The publication has several objectives. First and economy, markets or gambling – risk is combined foremost, it helps create awareness of as a product of likelihood multiplied by acknowledged risks and our knowledge about consequence: (R = L x C). This formula reduces them. As any assessment of risk is dependent on the two elements of risk to a single, alluringly clear context, the NRP also seeks to give readers the value. However, a precondition for combining the chance to reflect on risks, both those discussed two elements in a meaningful way is that there and others, as seen from their own point of view. must be a certain degree of comparability across The NRP may also inspire larger organisations, the range of risks being depicted. This applies to whether in the private or the public sector, to comparability in terms of the information on which draw up a risk profile of their own. It can also be we base the likelihood of something happening used as a reference point for work done by such (e.g. statistical data over time, evidence, or causal organisations on crisis management, security, and understanding), as well as to the comparability/ preparedness. For example, this could be in con- proportionality of the consequences to which a junction with the drafting of emergency manage- given incident is expected to lead. This is because ment plans or as inspiration for exercise planning. our tolerance towards different types of negative impact varies significantly.
5 Introduction National Risk Profile for Denmark | Danish Emergency Management Agency
Multiplying likelihood by consequence also in approaching risk through incident types, rather assumes that we take an equal interest in both than specific scenarios. the likelihood and the consequence of a given incident. This is typically not the case when we The world that we face, however, is ‘muddled and are dealing with major accidents and disasters. An mixed up’ and does not always lend itself to attempt – despite this – to combine likelihood and categorisation. It is important to remember that in- consequence into an overall, comparable risk cidents carrying traits from several of the incident value for each incident type would therefore, at types presented may also well occur. Evidently, best, be a simplification. At worst, it would be incidents combining negative aspects of sever- grossly misleading. al incident types will challenge society’s overall capacity for emergency management to an even Nevertheless, ‘risk’ is indeed made up of likeli- greater extent. hood and consequences. In the light of the above, however, these two elements will be addressed The incident types are described with a 0–5 year separately throughout this publication. Each time frame in mind. chapter will aim to provide a qualitative description of our knowledge and our knowledge What is a Trend? base as far as both likelihood and consequence Further to the incident types, the NRP will also is concerned. The NRP thus provides support to address phenomena that do not meet DEMA’s further risk assessments relating to a more criteria for incident types. These phenomena, specific location, context, organisation or event. or ‘trends’, are more difficult to define, and their This intended use is also part of the reason why significance less certain than in the case of the the incident types described are not ranked by incident types. They also typically develop over a any single parameter. longer period of time. The chapters dealing with trends address some of the change processes that What is an Incident Type? may become of major significance to society’s In the context of the NRP, an ‘incident’ means a emergency management or risk level. For our delimited sequence of events that has significant purpose, a ‘trend’ is a broad development within and immediate negative consequences for a given subject area that could either lead to the society, and requires an acute need for occurrence of new incident types, affect how coordination and crisis management within existing ones unfold, or how they are handled. Denmark’s borders at a level that is not purely Thus, trends can come to have a major impact on local. Incidents that are manageable within the the vulnerabilities within our society, or on our framework of daily emergency management overall capacity for emergency management and efforts, as well as incidents of a global nature the organisational configuration behind this. developing over a protracted period of time, are not included. The trends are described with a 5–15 year time frame in mind. ‘Incident type’ is an umbrella term covering incidents that share a sufficient number of Process characteristics in terms of how they arise and/or The NRP should be seen as a summary of the what is required of us as a society in order to deal broad spectrum of work being done in society with them. In other words, an incident type is not with regard to risk assessment and emergency a scenario, as the incident types described could management. This work is being done not only by manifest themselves in any number of specific the emergency management players but also by ways, and at various specific times and places. a wide range of authorities with responsibility for Dealing with risks in the form of incident types specific sectors. Accordingly, the risk profile has helps us group together central challenge themes, been produced with the involvement of experts and better understand the components of the and authorities. Having said that, it must be known risks that we face. This is part of the merit
6 Danish Emergency Management Agency | National Risk Profile for Denmark Introduction
stressed that DEMA alone is responsible for the prepared the individual chapters on each incident descriptions, assessments, and summaries type. contained in the publication. The selection of trends was done on the basis of This publication is a continuation of the work what DEMA considered may become particularly conducted in connection with the preparation of relevant to the risk profile. The criteria for the first edition of the NRP in 2013. inclusion were that, within the next 15 years, each trend should be considered: Selection Initially, all conceivable incident types within the • capable of exacerbating the consequences of boundaries of the definition above were placed one or more of the 13 incident types; on a gross list. Incident types that are unlikely to • capable of forming the basis of new incident occur in or close to Denmark – for example, major types; earthquakes – were not included, even if such • able to affect the configuration or scope of incidents could have consequences for Danes society’s emergency management or Danish interests abroad. In the same way, only capabilities; risks possible in Denmark itself were included, and not those that apply exclusively to other parts or of the Danish Realm. Given the considerable differences in climatic conditions, demography, • able to occupy emergency management geography, etc., it is more appropriate to draw up resources to such an extent that it would separate risk profiles for the Faroe Islands and compromise the effective management of Greenland. The gross list was then structured other simultaneous incidents. giving equal taxonomic value to each incident type. Phenomena that are pure consequences More trends than the four selected may be said to (e.g. power cuts) were included among the meet these criteria – for example, the increasing consequences of other incident types, and use of drones or the ‘Internet of things’ (IoT). As phenomena with significant mutual similarities in we are dealing with a longer perspective for the terms of how they are dealt with, were grouped future, it is not possible to identify precisely which together. For example, various types of infectious topics will become most pressing. diseases were grouped together under the inci- dent type heading ‘highly virulent diseases’. Nevertheless, the trends provide an opportunity to reflect on how new and old risks will be Following research and discussions with experts, affected by future developments. Climate the incident types on the gross list were change, for instance, is not included as a trend reviewed and assessed on the basis of their here, as this phenomenon is already having a very relevance, with particular emphasis on the impact real influence on a number of incident types in the of their consequences in Denmark in terms of risk profile. life, health, environment, economy, property, and vital societal functions. The term ‘vital societal Structure functions’ refers here to the activities, goods, and The first part of the risk profile consists of one services that form the basis of society’s overall chapter for each of the selected incident types. ability to function. Each chapter begins with a brief summary of a relevant serious incident that has taken place in A total of 13 incident types remained, which recent memory, in or outside Denmark. The aim formed a net list. here is to provide a concrete image of what the incident type in question may result in when things A consultation process followed from April to turn bad. September 2016 involving experts and responsible authorities, during which DEMA
7 Introduction National Risk Profile for Denmark | Danish Emergency Management Agency
This is then followed by a description of the possible consequences of future incidents. The characteristics of the phenomena covered by the examples selected do not constitute a full incident type and the key knowledge about them. chronological list and are included by consideration of their relevance to the incident The ‘characteristics’ section also includes central type in question in a Danish context. Examples are terms and definitions that require clarification in taken from Denmark, as well as from other coun- this context. tries in as far as they are comparable to a Danish setting regarding the incident type in question. A Next, the risk outline for the given incident type is number of the examples have themselves propel- expressed in two parts: led new preventive measures and will therefore hardly reappear in the same form entirely. Occurrence and consequences. ‘Occurrence’ Nonetheless, they serve to illustrate what has pre- describes the basis of the data and experience viously provoked surprise and resulted in serious available to us in terms of assessing under what consequences. circumstances (where, why, how often, and when) an incident type may occur. As with anything For the vast majority of incident types, their relating to the future, this is subject to varying effective management involves a number of degrees of uncertainty. There are great differences jurisdictions and – in some cases – private actors. in what type of knowledge we have of the In order to provide an overview of organisations individual incident types, how certain this particularly involved in the handling of an knowledge is, and how we can use it. ‘ incident type, these are listed under the heading Consequences’ describes the immediate ‘key actors’. This list should neither be considered damage and loss, cascading effects, and exhaustive nor in any ranked order. Which players subsequent effects that may arise if an incident are given a particularly important role in terms of occurs. What is meant in this context is loss of a particular incident will depend on the human life, injury to human health, negative effects specific course of events. The list refers to the on the environment, society’s economy (including relevant players at general level. For example, the the functionality of financial systems and public term ‘municipalities’ covers a wide range of costs), private/public property, and vital subordinate units providing various services, such societal functions. These parameters are as municipal emergency services, municipal discussed to the extent that is relevant for the water supply, care of the elderly, etc. incident type in question. To encourage further reflection, each individual The risk profile is not an attempt to predict chapter ends by depicting a short fictitious whether, where, when, how often, why, or exactly scenario under the heading ‘What if...?’. how an incident will unfold. By definition, extraordinary incidents and the courses they take Accompanying the text in each chapter on the are impossible to predict with such precision, and incident types is a figure entitled challenge pat- the specific course of events will almost always tern. For each individual incident type, there are include surprising elements. For the same reason, certain aspects that make it particularly difficult great emphasis is placed in the NRP on the for society to deal with. The challenge pattern qualitatively descriptive approach. indicates, for each incident type, the extent to which the following eight parameters represent a As an alternative to creating scenarios involving challenge to its effective management.: fictitious courses of events, the ‘examples’ section describes a selection of previous incidents of relevance to the risks described. The future cannot be predicted on the basis of the past, but experience from previous incidents can provide important learning points and good insight into
8 Danish Emergency Management Agency | National Risk Profile for Denmark Introduction
• KNOWLEDGE about the incident type: • MITIGATION of an incident’s To what extent is the management of the consequences: incident type challenged by the fact that To what extent is it difficult to prevent we lack familiarity with, or knowledge serious consequences arising from the about, the characteristics, origin, causal incident once it has occurred? connections or development of the incidents? • Geographical EXTENT: How big a part of the country can • PREVENTION of incidents: incidents of this type affect at the same To what extent is it difficult to prevent the time, and to what extent does this make triggering phenomenon underlying an managing them more difficult? incident from arising? • DURATION of an incident: • FREQUENCY of incidents: For how long can an incident of this type Do incidents of this type occur often, and last, and does the duration in itself to what extent does this in itself constitute constitute a problem? a problem? • RECOVERY following an incident: • EARLY WARNING prior to an incident: How demanding can it be in terms of time To what extent does the lack of and resources to return to an acceptable opportunities for warning the population normal state of affairs following an incident prior to an incident occurring constitute of this type? a problem when managing the incident type?
9 Introduction National Risk Profile for Denmark | Danish Emergency Management Agency