Fishery Circular
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States
NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular 440 Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States. Turbellaria: Acoela and Nemertodermatida Louise F. Bush July 1981 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Terry L. Leitzell, Assistant Administrator for FisherIes FOREWORD This NMFS Circular is part of the subseries "Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States;' which consists of original, illustrated, modern manuals on the identification, classification, and general biology of the estuarine and coastal marine plants and, animals of the northeastern United States. The manuals are published at irregular intervals on as many taxa of the region as there are specialists available to collaborate in their preparation. Geographic coverage of the "Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States" is planned to include organisms from the headwaters of estuaries seaward to approximately the 200 m depth on the continental shelf from Maine to Virginia, but may vary somewhat with each major taxon and the interests of collaborators. Whenever possible representative specimens dealt with in the manuals are deposited in the reference collections of major museums of the region. The "Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States" is being prepared in col laboration with systematic specialists in the United States and abroad. Each manual is based primarily on recent and ongoing revisionary systematic research and a fresh examination of the plants and animals, Each major taxon, treated in a separate manual, includes an introduction, illustrated glossary, uniform originally illustrated keys, annotated checklist with information \vhen available on distribution, habitat, life history, and related biology, references to the major literature of the group, and a systematic jnde:\. -
Introduction to the Bilateria and the Phylum Xenacoelomorpha Triploblasty and Bilateral Symmetry Provide New Avenues for Animal Radiation
CHAPTER 9 Introduction to the Bilateria and the Phylum Xenacoelomorpha Triploblasty and Bilateral Symmetry Provide New Avenues for Animal Radiation long the evolutionary path from prokaryotes to modern animals, three key innovations led to greatly expanded biological diversification: (1) the evolution of the eukaryote condition, (2) the emergence of the A Metazoa, and (3) the evolution of a third germ layer (triploblasty) and, perhaps simultaneously, bilateral symmetry. We have already discussed the origins of the Eukaryota and the Metazoa, in Chapters 1 and 6, and elsewhere. The invention of a third (middle) germ layer, the true mesoderm, and evolution of a bilateral body plan, opened up vast new avenues for evolutionary expan- sion among animals. We discussed the embryological nature of true mesoderm in Chapter 5, where we learned that the evolution of this inner body layer fa- cilitated greater specialization in tissue formation, including highly specialized organ systems and condensed nervous systems (e.g., central nervous systems). In addition to derivatives of ectoderm (skin and nervous system) and endoderm (gut and its de- Classification of The Animal rivatives), triploblastic animals have mesoder- Kingdom (Metazoa) mal derivatives—which include musculature, the circulatory system, the excretory system, Non-Bilateria* Lophophorata and the somatic portions of the gonads. Bilater- (a.k.a. the diploblasts) PHYLUM PHORONIDA al symmetry gives these animals two axes of po- PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM BRYOZOA larity (anteroposterior and dorsoventral) along PHYLUM PLACOZOA PHYLUM BRACHIOPODA a single body plane that divides the body into PHYLUM CNIDARIA ECDYSOZOA two symmetrically opposed parts—the left and PHYLUM CTENOPHORA Nematoida PHYLUM NEMATODA right sides. -
Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO)
ICES WGITMO Report 2006 ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment ICES CM 2006/ACME:05 Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 16–17 March 2006 Oostende, Belgium International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2006. Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO), 16–17 March 2006, Oostende, Belgium. ICES CM 2006/ACME:05. 334 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. ICES WGITMO Report 2006 | i Contents 1 Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Opening of the meeting and introduction.................................................................................... 5 3 Terms of reference, adoption of agenda, selection of rapporteur.............................................. 5 3.1 Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Adoption -
Exploring the Role of Macroalgal Surface Metabolites on the Settlement of the Benthic Dinoflagellate Ostreopsis Cf
Exploring the Role of Macroalgal Surface Metabolites on the Settlement of the Benthic Dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata Eva Ternon, Benoît Paix, Olivier Thomas, Jean-François Briand, Gérald Culioli To cite this version: Eva Ternon, Benoît Paix, Olivier Thomas, Jean-François Briand, Gérald Culioli. Exploring the Role of Macroalgal Surface Metabolites on the Settlement of the Benthic Dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata. Frontiers in Marine Science, Frontiers Media, 2020, 7, pp.683. 10.3389/fmars.2020.00683. hal- 02941755 HAL Id: hal-02941755 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02941755 Submitted on 17 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. fmars-07-00683 September 1, 2020 Time: 14:26 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 21 August 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00683 Exploring the Role of Macroalgal Surface Metabolites on the Settlement of the Benthic Dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata Eva Ternon1,2,3*†, Benoît Paix4†, Olivier P. Thomas5, Jean-François Briand4 and Gérald Culioli4* 1 CNRS, OCA, IRD, Université Côte d’Azur, Géoazur, Valbonne, -
Checklist of the Phyla Platyhelminthes
Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2014) 38: 698-722 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Review Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1405-70 Checklist of the phyla Platyhelminthes, Xenacoelomorpha, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, Myxozoa, Tardigrada, Cephalorhyncha, Nemertea, Echiura, Brachiopoda, Phoronida, Chaetognatha, and Chordata (Tunicata, Cephalochordata, and Hemichordata) from the coasts of Turkey Melih Ertan ÇINAR* Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey Received: 28.05.2014 Accepted: 28.06.2014 Published Online: 10.11.2014 Printed: 28.11.2014 Abstract: In this paper, the current status of the species diversity of 13 phyla, namely Platyhelminthes, Xenacoelomorpha, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, Myxozoa, Tardigrada, Cephalorhyncha, Nemertea, Echiura, Brachiopoda, Phoronida, Chaetognatha, and Chordata (invertebrates, only Tunicata, Cephalochordata, and Hemichordata) along the coasts of Turkey is reviewed. Platyhelminthes was represented by 186 species, Chordata by 64 species, Nemertea by 26 species, Nematoda by 20 species, Xenacoelomorpha by 11 species, Chaetognatha by 10 species, Acanthocephala by 9 species, Brachiopoda and Phoronida by 4 species, Myxozoa and Tradigrada by 2 species, and Cephalorhyncha and Echiura by 1 species. Two platyhelminth (Planocera cf. graffi and Prostheceraeus vittatus), 2 nemertean (Drepanogigas albolineatus and Tubulanus superbus), 1 phoronid (Phoronis australis), and 2 ascidian (Polyclinella azemai and Ciona roulei) species are being newly reported for the first time from the coasts of Turkey. Four tunicate (Symplegma brakenhielmi, Microcosmus exasperatus, Herdmania momus, and Phallusia nigra) and 1 chaetognath (Ferosagitta galerita) species were classified as alien species in the region. Key words: Miscellanea, other phyla, diversity, checklist, alien species, Turkey 1. Introduction coasts, with some faunistic data mainly derived from the The phylum Platyhelminthes comprises free-living and detailed studies performed in the Sea of Marmara, the parasitic flatworms. -
Morphology of the Testes and Spermatogenesis in Aacoela && Nnemertodermatida
MMORPHOLOGY OF THE TESTES AND SPERMATOGENESIS IN AACOELA && NNEMERTODERMATIDA MIEKE BOONE PROMOTORS: PROF. DR. WIM BERT (UGENT) PROF. DR. TOM ARTOIS (UHASSELT) DR. MAXIME WILLEMS (UGENT) Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of doctor in sciences, biology. Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het bekomen van de graad van doctor in de wetenschappen, biologie. 3 4 “But morphology is a much more complex subject than it at first appears” Darwin, 1872:584 5 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................... 13 1. General introduction ................................................................................................... 13 2. Characteristics of Acoela and Nemertodermatida ................................................. 14 2.1. Acoela ................................................................................................................... 14 2.2. Nemertodermatida .............................................................................................. 16 3. Phylogeny .................................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Phylogenetic position of Acoela and Nemertodermatida .............................. 17 3.2. Internal phylogenetic relationships ................................................................... 20 3.2.1. Acoela ............................................................................................................ 20 3.2.2. Nemertodermatida -
Borror's Species Checklist for the Isles of Shoals Archipelago
Borror’s Species Checklist for the Isles of Shoals Archipelago May 2009 Edition Meg N. Eastwood, Kipp Quinby, Robin Hadlock Seeley, Christine Bogdanowicz, Hal Weeks, and William E. Bemis Borror’s Species Checklist for Shoals Marine Laboratory May 2009 Edition Meg Eastwood, Kipp Quinby, Christine Bogdanowicz, Robin Hadlock Seeley, Hal Weeks, and William E. Bemis Shoals Marine Laboratory Morse Hall, Suite 113 8 College Road Durham, NH, 03824 Send suggestions for improvements to: [email protected] File Name: SML_Checklist_05_2009.docx Last Saved Date: 5/15/09 12:38 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i INTRODUCTION TO 2009 REVISION 1 PREFACE TO THE 1995 EDITION BY ARTHUR C. BORROR 3 CYANOBACTERIA 5 Phylum Cyanophyta 5 Class Cyanophyceae 5 Order Chroococcales 5 Order Nostocales 5 Order Oscillatoriales 5 DINOFLAGELLATES 5 Phylum Pyrrophyta 5 Class Dinophyceae 5 Order Dinophysiales 5 Order Gymnodiniales 5 Order Peridiniales 5 DIATOMS 5 Phylum Bacillariophyta 5 Class Bacillariophyceae 5 Order Bacillariales 5 Class Coscinodiscophyceae 5 Order Achnanthales 5 Order Biddulphiales 5 Order Chaetocerotales 5 Order Coscinodiscales 6 Order Lithodesmidales 6 Order Naviculales 6 Order Rhizosoleniales 6 Order Thalassiosirales 6 Class Fragilariophyceae 6 Order Fragilariales 6 Order Rhabdonematales 6 ALGAE 6 Phylum Heterokontophyta 6 Class Phaeophyceae 6 Order Chordariales 6 Order Desmarestiales 6 Order Dictyosiphonales 6 Order Ectocarpales 7 Order Fucales 7 Order Laminariales 7 Order Scytosiphonales 8 Order Sphacelariales 8 Phylum Rhodophyta 8 Class Rhodophyceae -
The Digestive System of Xenacoelomorphs
Published in "Cell and Tissue Research 377 (3): 369–382, 2019" which should be cited to refer to this work. The digestive system of xenacoelomorphs B. Gavilán1 & S. G. Sprecher2 & V. Hartenstein3 & P. Martinez 1,4 Abstract Interest in the study of Xenacoelomorpha has recently been revived due to realization of its key phylogenetic position as the putative sister group of the remaining Bilateria. Phylogenomic studies have attracted the attention of researchers interested in the evolution of animals and the origin of novelties. However, it is clear that a proper understanding of novelties can only be gained in the context of thorough descriptions of the anatomy of the different members of this phylum. A considerable literature, based mainly on conventional histological techniques, describes different aspects of xenacoelomorphs’ tissue architecture. However, the focus has been somewhat uneven; some tissues, such as the neuro-muscular system, are relatively well described in most groups, whereas others, including the digestive system, are only poorly understood. Our lack of knowledge of the xenacoelomorph digestive system is exacerbated by the assumption that, at least in Acoela, which possess a syncytial gut, the digestive system is a derived and specialized tissue with little bearing on what is observed in other bilaterian animals. Here, we try to remedy this lack of attention by revisiting the different studies of the xenacoelomorph digestive system, and we discuss the diversity present in the light of new evolutionary knowledge. Keywords Xenacoelomorpha . Xenoturbella . Nemertodermatida . Acoela . Digestive system . Syncytium . Lumen . Ultrastructure Introduction this is not a complete consensus since some researchers have suggested an alternative view of xenacoelomorphs as the most Xenacoelomorphs have become a group of animals that is basal deuterostomian clade (Philippe et al. -
The Digestive System of Xenacoelomorphs
Cell and Tissue Research (2019) 377:369–382 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-019-03038-2 REVIEW The digestive system of xenacoelomorphs B. Gavilán1 & S. G. Sprecher2 & V. Hartenstein3 & P. Martinez 1,4 Received: 21 February 2019 /Accepted: 16 April 2019 /Published online: 16 May 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Interest in the study of Xenacoelomorpha has recently been revived due to realization of its key phylogenetic position as the putative sister group of the remaining Bilateria. Phylogenomic studies have attracted the attention of researchers interested in the evolution of animals and the origin of novelties. However, it is clear that a proper understanding of novelties can only be gained in the context of thorough descriptions of the anatomy of the different members of this phylum. A considerable literature, based mainly on conventional histological techniques, describes different aspects of xenacoelomorphs’ tissue architecture. However, the focus has been somewhat uneven; some tissues, such as the neuro-muscular system, are relatively well described in most groups, whereas others, including the digestive system, are only poorly understood. Our lack of knowledge of the xenacoelomorph digestive system is exacerbated by the assumption that, at least in Acoela, which possess a syncytial gut, the digestive system is a derived and specialized tissue with little bearing on what is observed in other bilaterian animals. Here, we try to remedy this lack of attention by revisiting the different studies of the xenacoelomorph digestive system, and we discuss the diversity present in the light of new evolutionary knowledge. Keywords Xenacoelomorpha . Xenoturbella . -
Review of Data for a Morphological Look on Xenacoelomorpha (Bilateria Incertae Sedis)
Org Divers Evol (2016) 16:363–389 DOI 10.1007/s13127-015-0249-z REVIEW Review of data for a morphological look on Xenacoelomorpha (Bilateria incertae sedis) Gerhard Haszprunar1 Received: 19 October 2015 /Accepted: 12 November 2015 /Published online: 10 December 2015 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2015 Abstract Recent investigations by means of high-tech cavity conditions in the acoelomate Lophotrochozoa (particu- morphology, evo-devo studies and molecular data suggest larly Platyzoa), Gastrotricha and cycloneuralian Ecdysozoa. that the taxon Xenacoelomorpha (Nemertodermatida and Acoela plus Xenoturbella), formerly considered as primi- Keywords Xenacoelomorpha . Urbilateria . Phylogeny tive flatworms (Plathelminthes) or even bivalve Mollusca, represents either a quite plesiomorphic grouping as the earliest bilaterian offshoot or but is a substantially re- Introduction duced and simplified sidebranch of ambulacralian Deuterostomia. Herein, I provide a compilation and re- Up to the 1990s, the acoelomorph Bturbellarians^ have been view of the current morphological data and possible inter- regarded as primitive members of the phylum Plathelminthes pretations of the various character states. Phenotypic and (e.g. Ehlers 1985;Ax1996) and even critical voices (e.g. genotypic data suggest monophyly of Xenacoelomorpha. Smith et al. 1986) held this view. However, more recent anal- There is no specific similarity between xenacoelmorphs yses of morphological (in particular, ultrastructural, immuno- and deuerostome larvae, and reduction appears improba- cytochemical, ontogenetic and evo-devo data (Tables 1A–O ble in free-living and predatory animals. Accordingly, and 2, also Haszprunar 1996a, b;Nielsen2010) and in partic- Xenacoelomorpha are more likely similar to Urbilateria ular several independent and increasingly complex molecular rather than degenerated and simplified coelomate deutero- data sets (Baguña and Riutort 2004a, b; Tables 1P and 2)have stomes. -
Pathways of Evolution of Spermatozoa of Acoelomorpha and Free-Living Plathelminthes
Invertebrate Zoology, 2017, 14(1): 59–66 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2017 Main pathways of evolution of spermatozoa of Acoelomorpha and free-living Plathelminthes E.E. Shafigullina, Ya.I. Zabotin Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: On the basis of original and literary data on ultrastructure of spermatozoa and their formation the reconstruction of main pathways of evolution of male gametes of Acoelomorpha and free-living Plathelminthes is proposed. Two species of Acoela — Archaphanostoma agile and Convoluta convoluta — and five species of free-living flatworms from different taxa — Monocelis fusca, M. lineata (Proseriata), Uteriporus vulgaris (Tricladida, Maricola), Provortex karlingi (Rhabdocoela, Dalytyphloplanoida) and Macrorhynchus croceus (Rhabdocoela, Kalyptorhynchia) — have been investigated. Specimens were collected on the littoral zone of various islands of Keretskii Archipelago (White Sea), fixed in the 1% glutaraldehyde and studied with transmission electron microscope JEM 100 CX by the standard methodics. During the evolution of Acoela the axoneme formula of spermatozoa is modified and the position of free microtubules is reorganized. Evolutionary changes of spermatozoa of Plathelminthes are represented firstly by the locomotory apparatus (incorporation of flagellae, change of an axoneme formula and configurations of free microtubules), then by organization of nuclear material. And finally in specialized groups the oligomerization of mitochondria and additional inclusions occurs. In the spermiogenesis of Acoela and the advanced flatworms the specific peculiarities of ancestral forms, representing the examples of recapitulation on the cellular level, are described. The similarities and the differences of the sperm ultrastructure and spermiogen- esis in Acoelomorpha and Plathelminthes are discussed in evolutionary-morphological aspect.