79 Carnabie V Carnabie
1 97 CARNABY V JOHNSON AND CARNABY Sir William Carnaby of Bothal Castle, co. Northumberland, knt v Henry Johnson of Bothal, co. Northumberland, clerk, and Ralph Carnaby of Halton, co. Northumberland, gent May – October 1640 Name index: Bindloss, Jane Bindloss, Robert, knight Carnaby, Lancelot, esq Carnaby, Jane Carnaby, Mabel Carnaby, Ralph, gent Carnaby, Richard, gent Carnaby, William, knight Cavendish, William, earl of Newcastle Collingwood, Cuthbert, knight Collingwood, Katherine Fenwick, Anne Fenwick, William, knight Green, William, lawyer (also Greene) Hirdman, Henry, gent Howard, Henry, baron Maltravers Johnson, Henry, clerk Merrick, William, lawyer Watson, John Wentworth, Thomas, earl of Strafford Place index: France, Paris Middlesex, Westminster Northumberland, Bothal Bothal Castle Eslington Halton Morpeth Wallington Yorkshire, West Riding, Marston Moor Subject index: 2 coat of arms comparison denial of gentility Long Parliament member of parliament office-holding other courts Roman Catholic royalist self-assumed arms ship money taxation Abstract Carnaby claimed that he was insulted while presiding over a court at Bothal, Northumberland around Michaelmas 1639 by Henry Johnson, a cleric, who called him a ‘base knight’, with other ‘revileing speeches’. Sir William also claimed that at Morpeth on 8 January 1640, he required his relative Ralph Carnaby, from a junior branch of the family, ‘to give his armes with due distinction, which he not only refuseth to doe but boasteth himself to come of a branch of that stocke superior to your petitioner.’ Process was granted on 23 May 1640 and order was given to send to the commissioners for the testimony of witnesses on Sir William’s behalf in October. But these proceedings appear to apply only to the case against Johnson and nothing further survives.
[Show full text]