Conference Program and Abstracts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conference Program and Abstracts International Biogeography Society 7th Biennial Meeting ǀ 8–12 January 2015, Bayreuth, Germany Conference Program and Abstracts published as frontiers of biogeography vol. 6, suppl. 1 - december 2014 (ISSN 1948-6596 ) Conference Program and Abstracts International Biogeography Society 7th Biennial Meeting 8–12 January 2015, Bayreuth, Germany Published in December 2014 as supplement 1 of volume 6 of frontiers of biogeography (ISSN 1948-6596). Suggested citations: Gavin, D., Beierkuhnlein, C., Holzheu, S., Thies, B., Faller, K., Gillespie, R. & Hortal, J., eds. (2014) Conference program and abstracts. International Biogeography Society 7th Bien- nial Meeting. 8—2 January 2015, Bayreuth, Germany. Frontiers of Biogeography Vol. 6, suppl. 1. International Biogeography Society, 246 pp . Rabosky, D. (2014) MacArthur & Wilson Award Lecture: Speciation, extinction, and the geo- graphy of species richness In Conference program and abstracts. International Biogeo- graphy Society 7th Biennial Meeting. 8–12 January 2015, Bayreuth, Germany. (ed. by D. Gavin, C. Beierkuhnlein, S. Holzheu, B. Thies, K. Faller, R. Gillespie & J. Hortal), Frontiers of Biogeography Vol. 6, suppl. 1, p. 8. International Biogeography Society. This abstract book is available online at http://escholarship.org/uc/fb and the IBS website: http://www.biogeography.org/html/fb.html Passing for press on December 14th. General index General information 1 Conference Timetable 7 Plenary Lectures 9 Plenary Symposia 13 PS1: Adaptation, migration, persistence, extinction: New insights from past climate changes 15 PS2: Tracking changes from space: Advances of remote sensing in biogeography 17 PS3: Paleobiogeography: The importance of fossil data to species biogeography past, 19 PS4: Global functional diversity in a data-rich era 21 Contributed Talks 25 CT1: Island biogeography 27 CT2: Climate-change biogeography 30 CT3: Gradients, range limits, and beta diversity 33 CT4: Historical and paleo-biogeography 37 CT5: Conservation biogeography 40 CT6: Modelling species and ecosystems 43 CT7: Phylogeography 46 CT8: Quaternary and cultural legacies 49 CT9: The grand subject 52 CT10: Invasions 54 CT11: Latitudinal biodiversity gradients 56 CT12: Biodiversity hotspots 58 Poster presentations 61 PPS2: Tracking changes from space: Advances of remote sensing in biogeography 63 PPS4: Global functional diversity in a data-rich era 69 P1: Island biogeography 77 P2: Climate-change biogeography 91 P3: Gradients, range limits, and beta diversity 114 P4: Historical and paleo-biogeography 133 P5: Conservation biogeography 140 P6: Modelling species and ecosystems 164 P7: Phylogeography 172 P8: Quaternary and cultural legacies 185 P10: Invasions 195 P11: Latitudinal biodiversity gradients 199 P12: Biodiversity hotspots 203 P13: Marine biogeography 209 P14: Natural-disturbance biogeography 212 List of participants 215 Author Index 233 General information ISSN 1948-6596 Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Biogeography Society an international and interdisciplinary society contributing to the advancement of all studies of the geography of nature Bayreuth, Germany, 8– 12 January 2015 Organizing Committee Carl Beierkuhnlein, Department of Biogeography, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth Daniel Gavin, Department of Geography, University of Oregon Karen Faller, International Biogeography Society Birgit Thies, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth … and the Board of the IBS Co-organizers: © 2014 the authors; compilation © 2014 The International Biogeography Society – CC BY 4.0 license 1 General information The International Biogeography Society gratefully acknowledges generous support towards the Bayreuth meeting from the following sponsors: The conference is substantially supported by the German Research Foundation Gondwana sponsors Sponsor of the MacArthur & Wilson Award Sponsor of the Wallace Award & Poster Session 1 Laurasia sponsors Student Prize sponsors Local sponsors Student & Developing Country Travel Award sponsors Several anonymous IBS Members and Conference Attendees Sponsorship levels: Co-sponsor (10,000+ US$), Pangaea (5,000–10,000 US$), Gondwana (2,000–4,000 US$), Laurasia (1,000–2,000 )US$ 2 © 2014 the authors; compilation © 2014 The International Biogeography Society – CC BY 4.0 license General information This meeting would not have been possible without the hard work of many people, including: Conference Program Committee Daniel Gavin (IBS VP for Conferences), Chair, Department of Geography, University of Oregon, USA Carl Beierkuhnlein, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Germany Ella Vázquez Domínguez, National Autonomous University of Mexico Rosemary Gillespie (IBS President), University of California Berkeley, USA Jan Axmacher, University College London, UK Jessica Blois, University of California Merced, California, USA Jürgen Dengler, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Germany Hélène Morlon, National Center for Scientific Research, France Anna Papadopoulou, University of Michigan, USA Manuel Steinbauer, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Germany Kate He, Murray State University, USA Corinne Myers, Harvard University, USA David Nogués-Bravo, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Björn Reu, University of Leipzig, Germany Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Spain Alycia Stigall, Ohio University, USA Membership Coordinator Karen Faller, International Biogeography Society Program Book Editors Daniel Gavin, University of Oregon, USA Carl Beierkuhnlein, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Germany Stefan Holzheu, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Germany Birgit Thies, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Germany Karen Faller, International Biogeography Society Rosemary Gillespie (IBS President), University of California Berkeley, USA Joaquín Hortal, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Spain Student Travel & Poster Awards Committee Leticia Ochoa-Ochoa, Chair, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Sandra Nogué, University of Oxford, UK and University of Bergen, Norway Andrés Lira-Noriega, University of Kansas , USA Carolina Tovar, University of Oxford, UK Marta Jarzyna, Yale University, USA Ana M.C. Santos, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Spain George Stevens, Coastal Community Foundation, USA (ex officio) Local Organizing Committee: Gregor Aas, Leonor Álvarez-Cansino, Oliver Archner, Carl Beierkuhnlein, Jürgen Dengler, Bettina Engel- brecht, Verena Faßold, Philipp v. Gillhaußen, David Harter, Stefan Holzheu, Severin Irl, Anja Jaeschke, Anke Jentsch, Thomas Köllner, Gerhard Müller, Christine Pilsl, Johannes Ransijn, Manuel Steinbauer, Andreas Schweiger, Reinhold Stahlmann, Birgit Thies, Stephanie Thomas, Nils Tjaden © 2014 the authors; compilation © 2014 The International Biogeography Society – CC BY 4.0 license 3 General information International Biogeography Society 2013 – 2014 Officers President: Rosemary G. Gillespie President Elect: Carsten Rahbek VP for Conferences: Daniel Gavin VP for Public Affairs & Communications: Michael N Dawson VP for Development & Awards: George Stevens Secretary: Richard Field Treasurer: Lois F. Alexander Director-at-large: Catherine Graham Director-at-large: David Nogués-Bravo Student-at-large: Leticia Ochoa Ochoa First Past President: James H. Brown Second Past President: Mark V. Lomolino Third Past President: Brett R. Riddle Fourth Past President: Vicki Funk Fifth Past President: Robert J. Whittaker Sixth Past President: Lawrence R. Heaney Upcoming meeting host (ex officio): Carl Beierkuhnlein Past graduate student representative (ex officio): Ana M. C. Santos IBS Mission Statement Biogeography, the study of the geography of life, has a long and distinguished history, and one interwoven with that of ecology and evolutionary biology. Traditionally viewed as the study of geographic distributions, modern biogeography now explores a great diversity of patterns in the geographic variation of nature — from physiological, morphological and genetic variation among individuals and populations to differences in the diversity and composition of biotas along geographic gradients. Given its interdisciplinary and integrative nature, biogeography is now broadly recognized as a unifying field that provides a holistic understanding of the relation- ships between the earth and its biota. Our abilities to develop more general theories of the di- versity of life, and to conserve biological diversity may well rest on insights from the field of bio- geography. Therefore, the International Biogeography Society (IBS) was founded in 2001, and incorporated as a non-profit organization in 2002, with the following mission: Foster communication and collaboration between biogeographers in disparate academic fields - scientists who would otherwise have little opportunity for substantive interaction and collaboration. Increase both the awareness and interests of the scientific community and the lay public in the contributions of biogeographers. Promote the training and education of biogeographers so that they may develop sound strategies for studying and conserving the world’s biota. More information at the IBS website: http://www.biogeography.org 4 © 2014 the authors; compilation © 2014 The International Biogeography Society – CC BY 4.0 license General information © 2014 the authors; compilation © 2014 The International Biogeography Society – CC BY 4.0 license 5 General information Frontiers of Biogeography (ISSN 1948-6596) is the open access journal published by the International Bio- geography Society (IBS; http://www.biogeography.org/). Frontiers
Recommended publications
  • The Coume Ouarnède System, a Hotspot of Subterranean Biodiversity in Pyrenees (France)
    diversity Article The Coume Ouarnède System, a Hotspot of Subterranean Biodiversity in Pyrenees (France) Arnaud Faille 1,* and Louis Deharveng 2 1 Department of Entomology, State Museum of Natural History, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany 2 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR7205, CNRS, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 75005 Paris, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Located in Northern Pyrenees, in the Arbas massif, France, the system of the Coume Ouarnède, also known as Réseau Félix Trombe—Henne Morte, is the longest and the most complex cave system of France. The system, developed in massive Mesozoic limestone, has two distinct resur- gences. Despite relatively limited sampling, its subterranean fauna is rich, composed of a number of local endemics, terrestrial as well as aquatic, including two remarkable relictual species, Arbasus cae- cus (Simon, 1911) and Tritomurus falcifer Cassagnau, 1958. With 38 stygobiotic and troglobiotic species recorded so far, the Coume Ouarnède system is the second richest subterranean hotspot in France and the first one in Pyrenees. This species richness is, however, expected to increase because several taxonomic groups, like Ostracoda, as well as important subterranean habitats, like MSS (“Milieu Souterrain Superficiel”), have not been considered so far in inventories. Similar levels of subterranean biodiversity are expected to occur in less-sampled karsts of central and western Pyrenees. Keywords: troglobionts; stygobionts; cave fauna Citation: Faille, A.; Deharveng, L. The Coume Ouarnède System, a Hotspot of Subterranean Biodiversity in Pyrenees (France). Diversity 2021, 1. Introduction 13 , 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ Stretching at the border between France and Spain, the Pyrenees are known as one d13090419 of the subterranean hotspots of the world [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Geodiversity Supplementary Planning Guidance (May 2018)
    - Biodiversity and Geodiversity Supplementary Planning Guidance (May 2018) www.npt.gov.uk/ldp Sand Martin Bank © Barry Stewart Pipistrelle Bat © Laura Palmer Shrill Carder Bee © Mark Hipkin Contents Note to Reader 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Biodiversity and Geodiversity in Neath Port Talbot 5 2.1 What is 'Biodiversity' and 'Geodiversity'? 5 2.2 Biodiversity in Neath Port Talbot 5 2.3 Geodiversity in Neath Port Talbot 7 2.4 Green Infrastructure 8 3 Policy Context 11 3.1 National Policy Context 12 3.2 Local Policy Context 13 4 Policy Requirements 19 4.1 General Principles 19 5 Policy Implementation 21 5.1 Pre-Application Discussion 21 Supplementary Planning Guidance: Biodiversity and Geodiversity (May 2018) 5.2 Planning Application Submission 31 5.3 Decision / Determination 33 5.4 Monitoring, Management and Review 36 6 Contact Details 41 Appendices A SINC Criteria 1 B RIGS 11 C Specific Guidance on Wind Energy Schemes 15 D Compensation Scheme 21 E Glossary 27 Contents Supplementary Planning Guidance: Biodiversity and Geodiversity (May 2018) Note to Reader Note to Reader This document supplements and explains the policies in the Local Development Plan (LDP). The LDP was adopted by the Council on 27th January 2016 and forms the basis for decisions on land use planning in the County Borough up to 2026. This Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) has been prepared following a public consultation exercise that was undertaken in the Spring of 2018 and the guidance was adopted by the Council's Regeneration and Sustainable Development Cabinet Board on 18th May 2018. While only policies in the LDP have special status in the determination of planning applications, the SPG will be taken into account as a material consideration in the decision making process.
    [Show full text]
  • Neobisium (Neobisium) Moreoticum (Pseudoscorpiones: Neobisiidae) from Georgia
    Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 57: 37-42 Karlsruhe, April 2019 Neobisium (Neobisium) moreoticum (Pseudoscorpiones: Neobisiidae) from Georgia Mahrad Nassirkhani & Levan Mumladze doi: 10.30963/aramit5707 Abstract. A redescription of males of Neobisium (N.) moreoticum from Georgia is provided. Notes on its morphological variability and geographical distribution in Georgia are given. Keywords: Arachnida, Caucasus, pseudoscorpion, taxonomy, variability Zusammenfassung. Neobisium (Neobisium) moreoticum (Pseudoscorpiones: Neobisiidae) aus Georgien. Eine Wiederbeschreibung des Männchens von Neobisium (N.) moreoticum aus Georgien wird präsentiert. Die morphologische Variabilität und die Verbreitung in Georgien werden dargestellter Kopulationsorgane beider Geschlechter der Art präsentiert. Ergänzt wird dies durch Fotos nahe ver- wandter anatolischer Arten. The subgenus Neobisium (Neobisium) Chamberlin, 1930 cur- State University, Tbilisi, Georgia (ISUTG). The morpho- rently contains 15 known species occurring in Georgia (Har- logical terminology and measurements follow Chamberlin vey 2013): N. (N.) anatolicum Beier, 1949, N. (N.) brevidi- (1931), Harvey (1992), Harvey et al. (2012), Judson (2007) gitalum (Beier, 1928), N. (N.) carcinoides (Hermann, 1804), and Zaragoza (2008). N. (N.) cephalonicum (Daday, 1888), N. (N.) crassifemoratum It is important to note that the types of N. (N.) moreoti- (Beier, 1929), N. (N.) doderoi (Simon, 1896), N. (N.) eryth- cum should, according to Beier (1931), be lodged in the Na- rodactylum (L. Koch, 1873), N. (N.) fuscimanum (C. L. Koch, tural History Museum of Vienna, but unfortunately they are 1843), N. (N.) kobakhidzei Beier, 1962, N. (N.) granulatum currently unavailable because they may have not been placed Beier, 1937, N. (N.) labinskyi Beier, 1937, N. (N.) moreoticum back correctly or may be lost (C. Hörweg pers comm. in Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Cave-Dwelling Pseudoscorpions (Arachnida) in Brazil
    2019. Journal of Arachnology 47:110–123 Distribution of cave-dwelling pseudoscorpions (Arachnida) in Brazil Diego Monteiro Von Schimonsky1,2 and Maria Elina Bichuette1: 1Laborato´rio de Estudos Subterraˆneos – Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva – Universidade Federal de Sa˜o Carlos, Rodovia Washington Lu´ıs, km 235, Caixa Postal 676, CEP 13565-905, Sa˜o Carlos, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil; 2Programa de Po´s-Graduac¸a˜o em Biologia Comparada, Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Cieˆncias e Letras de Ribeira˜o Preto – Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, CEP 14040-901, Bairro Monte Alegre, Ribeira˜o Preto, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Pseudoscorpions are among the most diverse of the smaller arachnid orders, but there is relatively little information about the distribution of these tiny animals, especially in Neotropical caves. Here, we map the distribution of the pseudoscorpions in Brazilian caves and record 12 families and 22 genera based on collections analyzed over several years, totaling 239 caves from 13 states in Brazil. Among them, two families (Atemnidae and Geogarypidae) with three genera (Brazilatemnus Muchmore, 1975, Paratemnoides Harvey, 1991 and Geogarypus Chamberlin, 1930) are recorded for the first time in cave habitats as, well as seven other genera previously unknown for Brazilian caves (Olpiolum Beier, 1931, Pachyolpium Beier 1931, Tyrannochthonius Chamberlin, 1929, Lagynochthonius Beier, 1951, Neocheiridium Beier 1932, Ideoblothrus Balzan, 1892 and Heterolophus To¨mo¨sva´ry, 1884). These genera are from families already recorded in this habitat, which have their distributional ranges expanded for all other previously recorded genera. Additionally, we summarize records of Pseudoscorpiones based on previously published literature and our data for 314 caves.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Society of Herpetologists
    1 THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 48 Published 29 October 2014 2 Letter from the editor This letter finds itself far removed from last year’s ASH conference, held in Point Wolstoncroft, New South Wales. Run by Frank Lemckert and Michael Mahony and their team of froglab strong, the conference featured some new additions including the hospitality suite (as inspired by the Turtle Survival Alliance conference in Tuscon, Arizona though sadly lacking of the naked basketball), egg and goon race and bouncing castle (Simon’s was a deprived childhood), as well as the more traditional elements of ASH such as the cricket match and Glenn Shea’s trivia quiz. May I just add that Glenn Shea wowed everyone with his delightful skin tight, anatomically correct, and multi-coloured, leggings! To the joy of everybody in the world, the conference was opened by our very own Hal Cogger (I love you Hal). Plenary speeches were given by Dale Roberts, Lin Schwarzkopf and Gordon Grigg and concurrent sessions were run about all that is cutting edge in science and herpetology. Of note, award winning speeches were given by Kate Hodges (Ph.D) and Grant Webster (Honours) and the poster prize was awarded to Claire Treilibs. Thank you to everyone who contributed towards an update and Jacquie Herbert for all the fantastic photos. By now I trust you are all preparing for the fast approaching ASH 2014, the 50 year reunion and set to have many treats in store. I am sad to not be able to join you all in celebrating what is sure to be, an informative and fun spectacle.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoscorpions
    Colorado Arachnids of Interest Pseudoscorpions Class: Arachnida Order: Pseudoscorpiones Identification and Descriptive Features: Pseudoscorpions are tiny arachnids (typically Figure 1. Pseudoscorpion ranging from 1.25-4.5 mm body length). They possess pedipalps modified into pincers in a manner similar to scorpions. However, they differ in other features, notably possessing a broad, flattened abdomen that lacks the well developed tail and stinger. Approximately 200 species of pseudoscorpions have been described from North America. A 1961 review of pseudoscorpions within Colorado listed 30 species; however, these arachnids have only rarely been subjects for collection so their occurrence and distribution within Colorado is poorly known. The pseudoscorpion most often found within buildings is Chelifer cancroides, sometimes known as the “house pseudoscorpion”. It is mahogany brown color with a body length of about 3-4 mm and long pedipalps that may spread 8 mm across. Distribution in Colorado: Almost all pseudoscorpions that occur in Colorado are associated with forested areas although a few prairie species do occur. Conifer forests, including scrublands of pinyon and juniper, support several species. Others occur in association with Gambel oak and aspen. The house pseudoscorpion has an unusually broad distribution and is found associated with human dwellings over wide areas of North America and Europe. Life History and Habits: Pseudoscorpions usually occur under rocks, among fallen leaves or needles, under bark or similar moist sites where they hunt mites, springtails and small insects. Typically they wait in ambush within small crevices and grab passing prey with the pincers. In most species, connected to the movable “finger” of the pincer is a venom gland.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Field-Based Geodiversity Information in Schools
    USING FIELD-BASED GEODIVERSITY INFORMATION IN SCHOOLS. WHAT DO SCHOOLS WANT? HOW CAN RIGS AND CCW HELP? Cathie Brooks Alwyn Roberts A research project conducted for the Countryside Council for Wales October 2006 1 Content Acknowledgements Executive Summary Chapters 1 Project Rationale 2 Research Design 3 Geodiversity in the National Curriculum for Wales Primary 3-11 Secondary 11-16 Secondary 16-19 4 Existing Geodiversity Resources Primary 3-11 Secondary 11-16 Secondary 16-19 Teachers 16-19 Regional 5 Research into Future Geodiversity needs Primary 3-11 Secondary 11-19 Examination Board personnel Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification Residential Centre personnel 6 Initiatives undertaken by this project Foundation Phase KS 2 & 3 KS 4 7 Case Study, Anglesey Primary 3-11 Secondary 11-16 Secondary 16-19 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 2 Appendices 1 Acknowledgements 2 Distribution and size of entry of: WJEC Advanced GCE geography and geology; WBQ, North Wales, 2005 3 Geodiversity Audit 3A Primary 3-11 3B Secondary 11-16 3C Secondary 16-19 3D Cross-curricular components 4 Existing Geodiversity Resources, detail on specific resources 4A Primary 3-11: ESTA 4B Secondary 11-16: UKRIGS 4C Field sites in current educational use in North Wales 4D Regional: N Wales RIGS 5 Questionnaires for future geodiversity needs 5A1 & A2 Primary schools 5B1 & B2 Geography departments in Secondary schools 5C1 & C2 Geology departments in Secondary schools 6 Details of initiatives undertaken 6A Adapting North Wales RIGS Urban Geology Trails for educational use 6B Proposed KS4 Earth science submission for WJEC KS4 Science practical test 7 Questionnaires, Case Study, Anglesey 7D1 & D2 Primary schools 7E1 & E2 Science departments in Secondary schools 3 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr Stewart Campbell CCW, Mr Carl Atkinson CCW, Mrs Nerys Mullally CCW, Dr Margaret Wood, GeoMộn and Gwynedd and Mộn RIGS, for their insightful inputs into the design, development and writing of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • From Mid-Cretaceous Burmese Amber
    HISTORICAL BIOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2018.1528446 ARTICLE New subfamily of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Platypodidae) from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber George O. Poinar Jr.a, Fernando E. Vega b and Andrei A. Legalovc,d aDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; bSustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA; cInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia; dAltai State University, Barnaul, Russia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY An ambrosia beetle described as Palaeotylus femoralis n. gen et sp. belonging to a new subfamily Received 27 August 2018 (Palaeotylinae n. subfam.: Coleoptera: Platypodidae) is described from Cretaceous Burmese amber. It Accepted 22 September 2018 ff di ers from other subfamilies by the loose antennal club, 6-articled funicle, coarsely faceted eyes, tibiae KEYWORDS with teeth at apex, bilobed meso- and meta-tarsomeres 2 and 3 and tarsomere 1 shorter than Curculionoidea; tarsomeres 2–4 combined. This is the first described Platypodidae from Burmese amber and the oldest Platypodidae; new taxa; documented ambrosia beetle that demonstrates glandular sac mycangia containing yeast-like propa- Myanmar; Cretaceous gules and hyphal fragments. Introduction develop on fungi growing in wood tunnels (Jordal 2015; Kirkendall et al. 2015). While members of the Platypodidae Mesozoic Curculionoidea are well represented in Middle- are considered to be the most ancient of fungus cultivating Upper Jurassic impression fossils (Legalov 2010, 2011, 2012, insects (Jordal 2015), no Cretaceous representatives have been 2013, 2015; Gratshev and Legalov 2011, 2014) as well as in described that show a close association with a symbiotic fun- Cretaceous amber from the Middle Neocomian–Lower gus.
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo De Autoridades Taxonómicas De Arachnidae
    Catálogo de Autoridades Taxonómicas de Arachnidae Tomado de: Jiménez y Nieto 2005. Biodiv. del orden Araneae de las Islas del G. de Cal. (BK006); Kury y Cokendolpher (Opiliones); Lourenco y Sissom (Scorpiones). 2000. En: Llorente, et al., (eds.). Biodiv., taxon. y biog. de artróp. Méx. II. e ITIS, 2005 Araneae Opisthothelae Araneomorphae Anyphaenidae Hibana (Chamberlin, 1919) Hibana incursa (Chamberlin, 1919) Sinónimo Hibana johnstoni (Chamberlin, 1924) Hibana nigrifrons (Chamberlin & Woodbury, 1929) Araneidae Argiope (Fabricius, 1775) Argiope argentata (Fabricius, 1775) Sinónimo Argiope carinata C. L. Koch, 1871 Argiope cuyunii Hingston, 1932 Argiope filiargentata Hingston, 1932 Argiope filinfracta Hingston, 1932 Argiope gracilenta (Roewer, 1942) Argiope hirta Taczanowski, 1879 Argiope indistincta Mello-Leitão, 1944 Argiope panamensis (Chamberlin, 1917) Argiope submaronica Strand, 1916 Argiope waughi Simon, 1896 Argiope trifasciata (Forskål, 1775) Sinónimo Argiope abalosi Mello-Leitão, 1942 Argiope avara Thorell, 1859 Argiope plana L. Koch, 1867 Argiope platycephala (Caporiacco, 1947) Argiope pradhani Sinha, 1952 Argiope seminola Chamberlin & Ivie, 1944 Argiope stenogastra Mello-Leitão, 1945 Cyclosa (Walckenaer, 1842) Cyclosa turbinata (Walckenaer, 1842) Sinónimo Cyclosa culta O. P.-Cambridge, 1893 Cyclosa glomosa (Walckenaer, 1842) Cyclosa index O. P.-Cambridge, 1889 Cyclosa nanna Ivie & Barrows, 1935 Cyclosa tuberculifera O. P.-Cambridge, 1898 Cyclosa vanbruyseli (Becker, 1879) Cyclosa walckenaeri (O. P.-Cambridge, 1889) Sinónimo Cyclosa
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographic Patterns on Kimberley Islands, Western Australia
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 81 245–280 (2014) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.81.2014.245-280 SUPPLEMENT Biogeographic patterns on Kimberley islands, Western Australia L.A. Gibson Department of Parks and Wildlife, Science and Conservation Division, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia 6946, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – Australia’s islands play a signifi cant role in the conservation of its biota. The near-pristine islands along the Kimberley coast of north-western Australia are important natural refuges that have been relatively isolated from many of the threatening processes affecting the adjacent mainland. Between 2007 and 2010, 24 of the largest of these islands were surveyed for non-volant mammals, reptiles, birds, frogs, bats, land snails and vascular plants. To facilitate the setting of conservation priorities, I examined congruence in the biogeographic patterns among these taxonomic groups and related those to island-wide attributes. A high level of congruence in both spatial patterns of species richness and community similarity across most of the taxonomic groups was found. Congruence in species richness was best explained by a strong relationship with island area; while congruence in community similarity was infl uenced by the dispersal ability of taxa. Average annual rainfall and the extent of rock scree (or ruggedness) on an island were also strong correlates of both spatial patterns in community similarity and richness of regional endemics. I also show that this pattern was not explained by richness differences of species between islands alone, but largely due to species replacement among islands. These patterns refl ect the greater diversity of regional endemic species and/or habitat specialists that are restricted to the relatively high rainfall and extensively rocky islands; whereas the drier islands typically support widespread generalists that have distributions that extend into the semi-arid and arid zones.
    [Show full text]