Supporting Priority Investment in Somerset County, Phase 1: Summary of Pgia Characteristics and Existing Conditions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Background Report for Somerset County Regional Center Strategic Plan July 2018
Background Report for Somerset County Regional Center Strategic Plan July 2018 Background Report for the Somerset County Regional Center Strategic Plan PREPARED FOR THE REGIONAL CENTER PARTNERSHIP OF SOMERSET COUNTY Prepared By: ________________________________________ Joseph J. Layton, PP, AICP N.J. Professional Planners License # 33LI00144300 Maser Consulting, PA Assisted By: Maser Consulting, PA Deborah Alaimo Lawlor, FAICP, PP Austin Bejin and Somerset County Planning Division Staff: Walter Lane, PP, AICP, Director of Planning James Ruggieri, PP, AICP, Principal Community Planner Galina Chernikova, Senior Planner for GIS Adopted by the Regional Center Partnership of Somerset County as part of the Somerset County Regional Center Strategic Plan July 18, 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Bridgewater Township Mayor and Council Bridgewater Township Planning Board Raritan Borough Mayor and Council Raritan Borough Planning Board Somerville Borough Mayor and Council Somerville Borough Planning Board Somerset County Board of Chosen Freeholders Somerset County Planning Board Regional Center Partnership of Somerset County Somerset County Business Partnership Somerset County Park Commission Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 KEY COMPONENTS OF THE BACKGROUND REPORT ................................................................................... 4 THEMES AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BACKGROUND REPORT ....................................................... -
Storytime On
A WATCHUNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PUBLICATION The Westfield Leader and THE TIMES of Scotch Plains – Fanwood Thursday, January 14, 1999 Page 3 Coalition Looks to Continue Planning for Parking Deck and Jitney Service Efforts for Better Commute Top Westfield Mayor’s ’99 Agenda for Council CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 By PAUL J. PEYTON Central Avenue, or behind The Gap “One of the nails in the last agree- hood preservation program in and Mayor Jardim serves as Liaison to and the 9:04 a.m. trains leaving Specially Written for The Westfield Leader and The Times store on East Broad Street. ment (for a taxi service) was insurance around Cacciola Place and Central both groups. Westfield. WESTFIELD — Developing plans Third Ward Councilman John J. costs,” explained Councilman Gruba, Avenue on the south side. “RVLCC is a commuter-based • NJ Transit has said it will launch for a parking facility, jitney bus service Walsh viewed the selection of where to now in his eighth year on the governing The initiative suffered a setback when group,” Mayor Jardim explained. efforts this month to establish desig- and making the town’s Building and build a deck as the biggest task for the body. the state changed the criteria for the “They’re the folks who are doing the nated smoking and non-smoking ar- Public Works Department more cus- council, even above financing such a In terms of changes in the Public program just as Westfield was making commute, day in, day out. RVLCC is eas on the platforms of Newark Penn tomer friendly highlight Westfield’s facility. -
Raritan Borough Master Plan Update Somerset County Regional Center Strategic Master Plan
RARITAN BOROUGH MASTER PLAN UPDATE SOMERSET COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN Borough of Raritan Somerset County, New Jersey June 2003 Prepared by: Heyer, Gruel & Assocoates The RBA Group RARITAN BOROUGH MASTER PLAN UPDAll:: SOMERSET COUNTY REGIONAi CENTER STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN -n-m- REGIONAL C!:!N"J'J:::R Raritan Borough Master Plan Update Pr e pa red by Heyer, G ruel & Assoc iates 6 3 C hurc h St reet, 2nd Floor New Brunswick, N ew Je rs ey 0 8 90 l The RBA Group O ne Evergreen Pla ce Morristown , New Jersey 07962 Ju ne 2003 DI HEYER, GRUEL THE RSA GROUP o:J& ASSOCIATE S RAR I TAN BOROUGH MASTER PL AN LJPDA F SOMERSET COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER STRATEGIC MASTER PIAN - nm REGIONAL C'PNTT'R Raritan Borough Master Plan Update ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Raritan Borough Mayor and Council Rari tan Boroug h Plann ing Board Regional Center Stra teg ic Master Pion Steeri ng Committee Somerset County Boord of Chosen Freeholders Somerset County Planning Board Regiona Center Partnershi p Q I HEYER, GRUEL THE RBA GROUP CI]& ASSOCIATES RARITAN BOROUGH MASTER PLAN UPDATE SOMERSET COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER STRATEGIC MAS TER PLAN -THE- REGIONAL CJ::NT .t::R Raritan Borough Master Plan Update Ta ble of Contents Maps Introduction State Highway Access Management Code 30 Raritan Borough Reg ional Location Map Existing Right-of-Way W idths 31 Goals and Objectives Congestion 31 Raritan Woolen M ills Focus Area Recommendations 2 Traffic Volumes 3 1 Land Use Pion 5 Traffic Crashes 3 1 Raritan Federal Steel Focus Area Bikeways and Walkways 3 1 Introduction 5 Improvement Plans, Programs. -
Appendix E – Technical Memoranda 1-4
Appendix E – Technical Memoranda 1-4 Technical Memorandum 1: Outreach & Coordination November 2011 Making Connections: Somerset County’s Circulation Plan Update Table of Contents 1. Outreach and Coordination ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Outreach ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 Steering Advisory Committee ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.2 Focus and Stakeholder Groups .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.3 Planning Board Chair Outreach .......................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.4 Public Meetings .................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.5 Public Survey ...................................................................................................................... 1-3 Technical Memorandum 1: Outreach and Coordination 1-i Making Connections: Somerset County’s Circulation Plan Update 1. Outreach and Coordination 1.1 Introduction Making Connections is a community-based planning process to prepare a circulation plan that is truly reflective -
United States Department of the Interior •V NATIONAL PARK SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C
United States Department of the Interior •v NATIONAL PARK SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 IN REPLY REFER TO: JUL | 01984 The Director of the National Park Service is pleased to inform you that the following properties have been entered in the National Register of Historic Places beginning July 1, 1984 and ending July 7, 1984. For further information call (202) 343-9552. STATE .County, Vicinity, Property, A ddress,( D ate Listed) C 0 N NEC TIC U T, Fairfield County, Westport, Bradley-Wheeler House. 25 Avery PL (07/05/84) CONNECTICUT, Litchfield County, Salisbury, Lime Rock Historic District, Roughly White Hollow, Elm, Lime Rock, Norton Hill, and Furnace Rds. (07/05/84) FLORIDA, Broward County, Ft. Lauderdale, Bonnet House. 900 Birch Rd. (07/05/84) G EO R GIA, Clayton County, Lovejoy vicinity, Craw ford-Dorsey House and Cemetery, Freeman and McDonough Rds. (07/05/84) IDAHO, Clearwater County, Weippe, Brownfs Creek CCC Camp Barracks. 105 First St. E. (07/05/84) KANSAS, Wyandotte County, Kansas City, Huron Building, 905 N. 7th St. (07/05/84) KENTUCKY, Garrard County, Lancaster, Methodist Episcopal Church (Lancaster MR A), Stanford St. (07/02/84) ----------------------------------------- MASSACHUSETTS, Essex County, Beverly, Beverly Center Business District. Roughly bounded by Chapman, Central, Brown, Dane, and Essex Sts. (07/05/84) M ASSAC HUSETTS, Hampshire County. Amherst, Strong House. 67 Amity St. (07/05/84) MASSACHUSETTS, Middlesex County, Somerville, Carr, Martin W., SchooL 25 Atherton St. (07/05/84) MASSACHUSETTS, Norfolk County. Quincy, Cranch SchooL 270 WhitwellSt. (07/05/84) MISSISSIPPI, Amite County, Liberty vicinity, Pine wood, S of Liberty off Greensburg Rd. -
May 2009 Bulletin.Pub
TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - MAY, 2009 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 52, No. 5 May, 2009 The Bulletin MTA’S DOOMSDAY BUDGET Published by the New For many months, local news stories have news reports that Albany was working on York Division, Electric told of transit fares and tolls going up on MTA some sort of bailout plan, but as of publica- Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box facilities. The news media had been describ- tion time, nothing happened. 3001, New York, New ing a “Doomsday Budget”, and one such This table compares the existing fares with York 10008-3001. budget was adopted at the March 25, the new fares that are scheduled to go into monthly MTA board meeting by a vote of 12- effect on May 31. 1. Board member Norman Seabrook, who is For general inquiries, SUBWAY/SIR/LOCAL CURRENT NEW contact us at nydiv@ a “Governor’s appointee,” was the only mem- BUSES* electricrailroaders.org ber who voted against the fare hikes, saying Single ride $2.00 $2.50 MetroCard with bonus (15% on or by phone at (212) that board members still "have some time" to $1.74 $2.17 986-4482 (voice mail find an alternative. $7 or more purchase) available). ERA’s Unlimited MetroCard – 1 Day $7.50 $9.50 website is Fingers were pointed at the failure of Al- Unlimited MetroCard – 7 Days $25.00 $31.00 www.electricrailroaders. bany, specifically the Assembly and Senate Unlimited MetroCard – 30 Days $81.00 $103.00 org. and even Governor Paterson, to come to an agreement about providing additional funding *MTA NYC Bus, MTA Bus, and Bee Line buses. -
Route 202 Corridor Assessment and Multi
THE Louis Berger Group, INC. Corridor Assessment and Multi-Modal Mobility Plan for Route 202 5.0 TRANSIT AND TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS AND STRATEGIES This section describes current transit services and facilities as part of a bi-county assessment of travel conditions along the Route 202 transportation corridor. Public Transit service within the Route 202 Study Area consists of a combination of local bus, commuter bus and commuter rail operations. Local bus operations within the Study Area connect area residents to key trip destinations (e.g., major employers, shopping centers and other commercial concentrations, etc.), and to train stations, park and ride lots or other bus transit nodes. Commuter bus services operate primarily between pick-up points in the Study Area and destinations in Lower and Midtown Manhattan in New York City. Commuter rail operations connect the Study Area to major employment centers such as Newark, Hoboken and New York City. All modes collectively form an interconnected transit network, with the connections more frequent and convenient in the northern portions of the Study Area. 5.1 MULTI-MODAL TRANSIT SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR Somerset County comprises the northeastern part of the Study Area and is served primarily by NJ TRANSIT (NJT) bus and rail lines. While there is limited NJT service in Hunterdon County, consisting of some service along the Raritan Valley Rail Line and a mini-bus service along US Highway 22, NJT “Wheels 884”, Hunterdon County itself provides extensive service through “The LINK” system. There are also some existing private commuter routes operated by Trans-Bridge Lines and others for commuters traveling out of the two counties to Newark and New York City. -
Cumberland-Monmouth
Cumberland Cont. Page Millburn, Millburn Twp 31 New Sharon, Deptford Twp 59 Gary Corner, Raritan Twp 35 Golf View Manor, West Windsor Twp 47 Jamesburg Park, East Brunswick Twp 43 Montclair Heights Station, Cedar Grove 25 Newfield, Newfield Boro 77 Glen Gardner, Glen Gardner Boro 28 Green Curve Heights, Ewing Twp 46 Jamesburg, Jamesburg Boro 43 Fairton, Fairfield Twp 82 Twp North Woodbury, Deptford Twp 59 Grandin, Union Twp 35 Grovers Mill, West Windsor Twp 42 Keasbey, Woodbridge Twp 38 Farmingdale, Millville City 83 Montclair Heights, Cedar Grove Twp 25 Oak Valley, Deptford Twp 59 Hamden, Clinton Twp 35 Groveville, Hamilton Twp 46 Kendall Park, South Brunswick Twp 42 Finley, U Deerfield Twp 76 Montclair Station, Montclair Town 32 Ogden, West Deptford Twp 59 Hampton Junction, Hampton Boro 28 Haines Corner, Hamilton Twp 47 Kingston, South Brunswick Twp 42 Fithians Corner, Hopewell Twp 82 Montclair, Montclair Town 32 Paradise, West Deptford Twp 58 Hampton, Hampton Boro 28 Hamilton Square, Hamilton Twp 46 Lahiere, Edison Twp 38 Fordville, Fairfield Twp 83 Morehousetown, Livingston Twp 31 Parkers Landing, E Greenwich Twp 59 Headquarters, Delaware Twp 40 Harbourton, Hopewell Twp 40 Laurel Park, Sayreville Boro 43 Forest Grove, Vineland City 76 Mountain Avenue Station, Cedar Grove 25 Parkville, West Deptford Twp 59 Hensfoot, Union Twp 35 Harneys Corner, Ewing Twp 46 Laurence Harbor, Old Bridge Twp 44 Fortescue, Downe Twp 88 Twp Paulsboro, Paulsboro Boro 58 High Bridge, High Bridge Boro 28 Harts Corner, Hopewell Twp 46 Lawrence Brook Manor, East -
Northwestern Middlesex County Transit Study
Northwestern Middlesex County Transit Study Prepared by the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy for New Jersey Transit and the Middlesex County Division of Planning May 2014: Bloustein School New Jersey Transit Studio Acknowledgements The Team Students: Instructors: Alexander Anhwere-James Andras Holzmann Michael Carrigy David Lira Baltazares Paul Larrousse, National Stephen Courage Daniel Smith Transit Institute Sherri Dawson Joseph Steindam Steve Fittante, NJ Transit David Dubovsky Christopher Townley Randy Fixman Sean Varsolona Dong Gao Benny Zheng Special thanks to: Jim Gilligan, NJ Transit; Anthony Gambilonghi, Middlesex County; Ryan Rapp, Middlesex County; Beverley Briggs, MCAT; Chris Consenza, Borough of Metuchen; Joe Criscuolo, Township of Piscataway; John Verlaque, Weingarten Law-Villas Edison TOD; Donna Allison, RideWise; Yvonne Manfra, Somerset County; Richard Phoenix, Township of North Plainfield; Bill Nierstedt, City of Plainfield; Greg Fidyk, South Jersey Transportation Authority May 2014: Bloustein School New Jersey Transit Studio Table Of Contents Executive Summary I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Methodologies ..................................................................................................... 2 II. Background Information ....................................................................................... 3 Existing Bus Service ...................................................................................... -
Operating Passenger Railroad Stations in New Jersey
FHR-S-300 (11-78) United States Department off the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections ____________ 1. Name Operating Passenger Railroad Stations in New~«3ea?sey historic and/or common 2. Location street & number Multiple - see attached survey forms for publication city, town vicinity of congressional district state code county code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public occupied agriculture museum building(s) private unoccupied X commercial park structure x both work in progress educational X private residence eito Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted government scientific X Thematic being considered yes: unrestricted industrial X transportation <*/fl no military other: 4. Owner off Property name Multiple - see attached survey forms street & number city, town vicinity of state courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Multiple - see attached survey forms street & number city, town state 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Operating Passenger RR Stations in X N|T , An survey has this property been determined eligible? .yes no X date 1981 federal state county local Office of New Jersey Heritage, CN 402 depository for survey records Trenton city, town 7. Description Condition Check one Check one _ x excellent x deteriorated x unaltered X original site x good ruins X altered moved date X fair unexposed t-" '••'.' . • Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance This nomination is the result of a survey of all 112 of New Jersey's operating passenger railroad stations built before World War II.* Later stations, and those no longer in railroad use, were not considered, nor were operational structures such as signal towers, bridges, catenaries, etc. -
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAILROAD STATION SURVEY I, IDENTIFICATION 2. EVALUATION
- JUN L <- '- N.J. Office of Cultural and Environmental Services, 109 W. State Street, Trenton, N.J. 08625 609-292-2023 Prepared by Heritage Studies, Inc. Princeton, N.J. 08540 609-452-1754 BR 2GO5- Survey #8-5 NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAILROAD STATION SURVEY i, IDENTIFICATION A. Name: Common Plainfield $ <C1 Line:*aritan valley Historic (Jersey Central) B. Address or location: 'North Ave., ^County: Union Watehung Aver, E, 4th~Strr an<? Municipality: Plainfield City Park A ve/ ill ^la in fie Id, N.J. Block & lot: part of: 1006/1 C. Owner's name: N.J. Transit Address: Newark, N.J. station, . and.. D. Location of legal description: Recorder of-Deeds, Union County Courthouse/ Broad St., Elizabeth, N.J. 05207 E. Representation in existing surveys: (give number, category, etc., as appropriate) HABS _____ HAER ____ELRR Improvement____NY&LB Improvement __ Plainfield Corridor J3 n^p. NR(name, if HP)________________ NJSR (name, if HP) NJHSI (#) _____ Northeast Corridor Local ______________________________(date_______ Modernization Study: site plan x floor plan . x aerial photo other views x photos of NR quality? x____ 2. EVALUATION A. Determination of eligibility: SHPO comment? X________(date2-29-?7 NR det.? (date ? B. Potentially eligible for NR: yes_x_possible __ no __ individual thematic x C. Survey Evaluation: 155/190 poj nts 173 -2 2QO5- FACILITY NAME: Plainf ield Survey # 8-5 3. DESCRIPTION-COMPLEX IN GENERAL Describe the entire railroad complex at this site; mention all buildings and structures, with notation of which are not historic. Check items which apply and discuss in narrative: _ Moved buildings (original location, date of and reason for move) _ Any non-railroad uses in complex (military recruiting, etc.) _ Any unusual railroad building types, such as crew quarters, etc. -
Feasibility Analysis Report
Feasibility Analysis Report April 2011 Submitted by: SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. In Association with: Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. STV Incorporated Urbitran Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Area...................................................................................................................................1 1.3 Existing Highways, Transit Services, Park-and-Rides................................................................1 1.4 Project History.............................................................................................................................2 1.5 Transportation Problems and Needs............................................................................................2 1.6 Project Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................................3 1.7 Planning Context .........................................................................................................................3 2. Public Involvement.............................................................................................................................5 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................5