The Pertek Granitoid, Taurus Orogenic Belt, Turkey
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1691 Tarihli Cizye Defterine Göre Pertek, Mazgirt, Çemişgezek Ve
OTAM, 41 /Bahar 2017, 191-218 1691 Tarihli Cizye Defterine Göre Pertek, Mazgirt, Çemiûgezek ve Saøman KazalarÖ Pertek, Mazgird, Çemiûgezek and Saøman Districts According to the 1691 Jizya Inventory Zülfiye KOÇAK* Özet OsmanlÖ tarihi incelemelerinin temel baûvuru kaynaklarÖnÖ arûiv belgeleri oluûturmaktadÖr. Birinci el kaynaklardan olan arûiv belgeleri, geçmiûin günümüze aktarÖlmasÖnda köprü vazifesi üstlendiklerinden oldukça önem taûÖmaktadÖrlar. Bu belgeler arasÖnda yer alan cizye defterleri de insan, zaman ve mekân unsurlarÖnÖ bir arada barÖndÖrdÖklarÖndan OsmanlÖ tarihi araûtÖrmalarÖnÖn vazgeçilmezleri arasÖndadÖrlar. Bu çalÖûmada H.1102/M.1691yÖlÖnda tutulan Diyarbekir Eyaleti’ne tabi Pertek, Mazgirt, Çemiûgezek ve Saøman kazalarÖna ait cizye defterinin tanÖtÖmÖ ve deøerlendirmesi yapÖlmÖûtÖr. Defter, adÖ geçen kazalarda gayrimüslim nüfusun ikamet ettiøi mahalleleri ve köyleri göstermekte, bu coørafyada yaûayan insanlarÖn fiziksel özellikleri ve meslekleri hakkÖnda bilgiler içermektedir. Bu baølamda defterdeki bilgiler dikkatlice incelenmiû adÖ geçen kazalarÖn o dönemki sosyo-ekonomik ve demografik dinamikleri açÖøa çÖkarÖlmaya çalÖûÖlarak bu bilgilerin hangi tür çalÖûmalarda kullanÖlabileceøine dair öneriler sunulmuûtur. Anahtar Kelimeler: OsmanlÖ, Diyarbekir Vilayeti, Cizye, Gayrimüslim, Nüfus. Abstract The archival documents are the main sources for the investigation of the Ottoman history. These sources are very important as they are functioning like a bridge, conveying the past into present. In examining the Ottoman history, Jizya -
Geology of Tunceli - Bingöl Region of Eastern Turkey
GEOLOGY OF TUNCELİ - BİNGÖL REGION OF EASTERN TURKEY F. A. AFSHAR Middle East Technical University, Ankara ABSTRACT. — This region is located in the Taurus orogenic belt of the highland district of Eastern Turkey. Lower Permian metasediments and Upper Permian suberystalline limestone are the oldest exposed formations of this region. Lower Cretaceous flysch overlies partly eroded Upper Permian limestone discordantly. The enormous thickness of flysch, tuffs, basaltic - andesitic flows, and limestones constitute deposits of Lower Cretaceous, Upper Cretaceous, and Lower Eocene; the deposits of each of these periods are separated from the others by an unconformity. Middle Eocene limestone is overlain discordantly by Lower Miocene marine limestone which grades upward into lignite-bearing marls of Middle Miocene and red beds of Upper Miocene. After Upper Miocene time, this region has been subjected to erosion and widespread extrusive igneous activities. During Permian this region was part of Tethys geosyncline; in Triassic-Jurassic times it was subjected to orogenesis, uplift and erosion, and from Lower Cretaceous until Middle Eocene it was part of an eugeosyncline. It was affected by Variscan, pre-Gosauan, Laramide, Pyrenean, and Attian orogenies. The entire sedimentary section above the basement complex is intensely folded, faulted, subjected to igneous intrusion, and during five orogenic episodes has been exposed and eroded. INTRODUCTION In the August of 1964 the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey assigned the writer to undertake geologic study of the region which is the subject of discussion in this report. This region is located in the highland district of Eastern Turkey, extending from Karasu River in the north to Murat River in the south. -
Tunceli Master Plani 1971 KB
T.C T.C. TUNCELĠ GIDA GIDA TARIM VE TARIM VE HAYVANCILIK HAYVANCILIK BAKANLIĞI ĠL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ TUNCELĠ TARIM MASTER PLANI EYLÜL 2012 1 T.C. GIDA TARIM VE HAYVANCILIK BAKANLIĞI Strateji GeliĢtirme BaĢkanlığı Tunceli Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Ġl Müdürlüğü Tunceli Valisi Hakan Yusuf GÜNER Vali Yardımcısı EĢref YONSUZ Ġl Müdürü Orhan KAYA Ġl Müdür Yardımcısı V. Selman TOPRAKÇI Güncelleyen Hasan GÜNGÖRDÜ (Ziraat Müh.) Çağlar ġAHĠN (Sosyolog) Bahar YALÇIN (Ziraat Müh.) Akan YÖNDEM (Veteriner Hek.) Ayhan KAHRAMAN (Ziraat Müh.) Mahmut BAL (Tekniker) 2 Tunceli Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Ġl Müdürlüğü Ġ Ç Ġ N D E K Ġ L E R SAYFA NO KISALTMALAR 6 TABLOLAR 7 GRAFĠKLER 10 SUNUġ 12 TUNCELĠ ĠLĠ TARIMSAL MASTER PLANI 14 BÖLÜM 1.GĠRĠġ 14 BÖLÜM 2. PLANLI KALKINMA VE TARIM 15 2.1. TARIMSAL PLANLAMA SÜRECĠ 15 2.2. POLĠTĠKA ÇERÇEVESĠ 15 2.2.1. Türk Tarım Politikasının GeliĢimi 15 2.2.2. Uluslar Arası Tarım Politikasının Ulusal Tarım Politikalarına Etkileri 16 2.2.3. VIII. BeĢ Yıllık Kalkınma Planında Tarım 19 2.3. Tarımsal Kalkınmanın Gereklilikleri 22 2.4. Mevcut Plan ve Programlar 23 2.4.1. Türkiye Hayvancılık Stratejisi Raporu 23 2.4.2. Ulusal Ormancılık Programı 23 2.4.3. Doğu Anadolu Su Havzası Rehabilitasyon Projesi 23 2.4.4. Diğer Projeler 23 2.4.4.1. Çayır Mera Yem Bitkileri Ve Hayvancılığı GeliĢtirme Projesi 23 BÖLÜM 3. ĠLĠN ÖZELLĠKLERĠ 24 3.1. BĠYOFĠZĠKSEL ÖZELLĠKLER 24 3.1.1. Ġlin Genel Tanımı 24 3.1.2. Agroekolojik Alt Bölgeler 24 3.1.3. Topoğrafya 25 3.1.4. Ġklim 28 3.1.5. -
Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000
MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11 -
Pertek Kalesi Pertek Kalesi
ERTUĞRUL DANIK* PERTEK KALESİ PERTEK KALESI I. ESKİ PERTEK'İN metinlerinde geçen "Pittiiarik" kentinin Pertek COĞRAFYASI VE JEOLOJİSİ olarak önerilmesi^ bu konuya ilişkin ilk ve tek bilgi olarak görülmektedir. Her ne kadar yerleşim nfik dönemdeki adı ile Arsanias'ın yani yerinde yeterli ve detaylı araştırma ya da bilimsel Murat Nehri'nin kıyısında, Tunceli iline kazı yapılmamışsa do, mevcut kimi bilgiler bağlı bugünkü Pertek ilçe merkezinin 5 A bölgede Hitit, Asur ve Unartu egemenliklerinin km güneyinde kurulu iken, Keban Baraj yaşandığını göstermektedir. Bu egemenlikler Gölü rezervuar alanı içinde kalan Eski Pertek sırasında ise, kale alanının kullanıldığını^ kale kenti; dönemi içinde güneyde Elazığ ili ile içinde ve kalenin oturduğu kayalık alanda bulu sınırlanırken; doğusunda, batısında ve kuzeyinde, nan işçiliklerden anlayabilmeldeyiz. kuzeye doğru gittikçe yükselen dağ sıraları ile çewilidir. Batı yönünde Kurmizak ve Çemişkezek, Hitit metinlerindeki "Pittiarik" dışında farklı kuzey yönünde Sağman, doğu yönünde Mazgirt bir isim önermesi bulunmayan Pertek yerleşiminin, kaleleri, güney yönünde ise Bekçiler ve Harput adı ve kaynağı konusunda ilk önermeyi yapan kalesi, yakın ilişkili kaleler durumdadır. Evliya Çelebi, kalede bir dönem var olduğunu Güneydeki alçak seviyeli tepelerin söylediği bir karakuş kabartması ya da heykeli oluşturduğu Harput Platosu'na ve dönemin Murat nin, Moğol dilinde "Pertek" olarak anıldığını belir Vadisi'nden batıdaki Çemişkezek'e doğru giden tir'. Evliya Çelebi'nin görmediği ancak, var az engebeli alana karşın, doğu ve kuzeyde yer olduğunu söylediği söz konusu heykelin varlığı ve obn yüksek rakımlı dağ sıraları, günümüzde de açıklaması, Pertek adının açıklaması için yetersiz olduğu gibi, Pertek'i daha çok güney yöndeki kalırken; bu görüşten sonra gelen önermeler Harput ve batıdaki Çemişkezek ile ilişki kurmaya arasındaki en ciddi öneri "küçük kale" ya da zorlamıştır. -
Dogan and Others V Turkey 29Jun04
CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 June 2004 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Dogan and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr G. RESS, President, Mr I. CABRAL BARRETO, Mr L. CAFLISCH, Mr R. TÜRMEN, Mr J. HEDIGAN, Mrs M. TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA, Mrs H.S. GREVE, judges, and Mr V. BERGER, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 12 February and 10 June 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in fifteen applications (nos. 8803/02, 8804/02, 8805/02, 8806/02, 8807/02, 8808/02, 8809/02, 8810/02, 8811/02, 8813/02, 8815/02, 8816/02, 8817/02, 8818/02 and 8819/02) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by fifteen Turkish nationals, Mr Abdullah Dogan, Mr Cemal Dogan, Mr Ali Riza Dogan, Mr Ahmet Dogan, Mr Ali Murat Dogan, Mr Hasan Yildiz, Mr Hidir Balik, Mr Ihsan Balik, Mr Kazim Balik, Mr Mehmet Dogan, Mr Müslüm Yildiz, Mr Hüseyin Dogan, Mr Yusuf Dogan, Mr Hüseyin Dogan and Mr Ali Riza Dogan (“the applicants”), on 3 December 2001. -
Culture, Politics and Contested Identity Among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: the Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2019 2019, Vol. 6, No. 1, 63-76 ISSN: 2149-1291 Culture, Politics and Contested Identity among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: The Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival Ülker Sözen1 Netherlands Institute in Turkey This article analyzes the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival organized by the people of Dersim, an eastern province of Turkey, as a site of political activism, cultural reproduction, and intra-group contestation. The festival began as a group- remaking event for restoring cultural identity, defending locality, and mobilizing Dersimli people in the face of political repression. In time, socio-spatial and political fragmentation within Dersimli society became more prevalent. The festival experience came to reflect and contribute to the debates and anxieties about identity whereby different political groups competed to increase their influence over local politics as well as the event itself. On the one hand, this article discusses the organization of the Munzur Festival, its historical trajectory, and the accompanying public debates and criticisms. On the other, it explores festive sociabilities, cultural performances, and the circulation of politically-charged symbols throughout the event which showcases the articulation and competition of multiple ethno-political belongings which are the Dersimli, Kurdish, Alevi, and socialist ones. The festival’s historical trajectory is dealt as two stages, unified struggle and internal strife, whereby the festival appeared as first a group-remaking then unmaking public event. The paper argues that this transformation is tied to hanging power relations in the local politics of Dersim, and the shifting state policies, namely the phase of repressive control strategies until the mid-2000s and the peace process and political relaxation until 2015. -
OSAC Crime & Safety Report: Adana
Turkey 2020 OSAC Crime & Safety Report: Adana This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Consulate in Adana. OSAC encourages travelers to use this report to gain baseline knowledge of security conditions in southeastern Turkey. For more in-depth information, review OSAC’s Turkey country page for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. Travel Advisory The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Turkey at Level 2, indicating travelers should exercise increased caution due to terrorism and arbitrary detentions. Do not travel to areas near the Syrian and Iraqi borders due to terrorism. Reconsider travel to Batman, Bingol, Bitlis, Diyarbakir, Gaziantep, Hakkari, Hatay, Kilis, Mardin, Sanliurfa, Siirt, Sirnak, Tunceli, and Van Provinces, all of which are in the Adana Consular District. Review OSAC’s report, Understanding the Consular Travel Advisory System. Overall Crime and Safety Situation Crime Threats The U.S. Department of State has assessed Adana as being a LOW-threat location for crime directed at or affecting official U.S. government interests. Mugging, vandalism, other petty crimes as well as narcotics-related crime occur. Crimes of opportunity (e.g. pickpocketing, purse snatching) may occur more frequently; however, random violent acts of crime are rare. Crime statistics provided by the Turkish National Police (TNP) for Adana province for 2019 include 5,862 thefts, 395 cases of extortion & robbery, 45 homicides, 1,612 vehicle break-ins, and 83 vehicle thefts. -
K-Ar Age, Geochemical, and Sr-Pb Isotopic Compositions of Keban Magmatics, Elazig, Easternanatolia, Turkey
Vol.3, No.9, 750-767 (2011) Natural Science http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ns.2011.39100 K-Ar age, geochemical, and Sr-Pb Isotopic compositions of keban magmatics, elaziğ, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey Sevcan Kürüm Engineering Faculty, Department of Geology, University of Fırat, Elazig, Turkey; [email protected] Received 9 August 2011; revised 11 September 2011; accepted 27 September 2011. ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Keban magmatics consist of plutonic rocks of Within the Southeastern Anatolia orogenic belt and acidic and intermediate compositions with diffe- the Neotethys convergent system developed during the rent phases. They are the equivalent of surface tectonomagmatic evolution of the southern Neotethys, rocks. In the current study on plutonic rocks, Keban magmatics form the easternmost branch of the general petrographic features, disequilibrium Göksun-Afşin, Doğanşehir, and Baskil granitoids [1-8] textures such as skeletal formation in minerals, (Figure 1). These granitoids of the Cretaceous age [3,6] poikilitic texture, oscillatory zoning, and mineral have intrusive contact relationships [3-7,11-13] with fragmentation, and growth states are observed. platform carbonates (Malatya-Keban metamorphic), op- Besides these microscopic properties, the exi- hiolites (Göksun, İspendere, Kömürhan, Guleman), meta- stence of rounded mafic enclaves of various morphic rocks related to ophiolites (Berit) [6,7,14], and sizes, petrographic syn-plutonic dykes, and ensimatic island-arc units present in the orogenic belt field data support the idea that mafic and felsic (Elazığ-Yüksekova) [3,4,6,7,11,12,15]. magmas are mixed. Keban magmatics have The objective of the current paper is to present the I-type, metaluminous-peraluminous characteri- field relations, petrography, geochemical and isotopic stics. -
Traditional Knowledge of Wild Edible Plants of Iğdır Province (East
Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae DOI: 10.5586/asbp.3568 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-10-06 Accepted: 2017-11-15 Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants Published: 2017-12-28 of Iğdır Province (East Anatolia, Turkey) Handling editor Łukasz Łuczaj, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Rzeszów, Poland Ernaz Altundağ Çakır* Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Düzce University, 81620 Konuralp, Düzce, Funding Turkey This research was partially supported by the Research * Email: [email protected] Fund of Istanbul University (project No. 1441) and partially conducted at the author’s own expense. Abstract Iğdır Province is situated in the Eastern Anatolian Region of Turkey. Wild edible Competing interests plants and their utilization methods have not been previously documented there. No competing interests have been declared. Tis study was conducted during an ethnobotanical survey of Iğdır Province from 2007 to 2012, in the period from May to October, when plants were in their fower- Copyright notice ing and fruiting periods. Tere were 210 interviews carried out in 78 villages. Tis © The Author(s) 2017. This is an study provides information about 154 wild plant taxa belonging to 27 families that Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative have been used as foodstufs, spices, or hot drinks. Seventeen wild edible plants were Commons Attribution License, recorded for the frst time during this study. Eight endemic species were reported which permits redistribution, as used for their edibility, and new local names for plants were also recorded. Te commercial and non- cultural importance index was calculated for each taxon. -
Forced Evacuations and Destruction of Villages in Dersim (Tunceli), and Western Bingöl, Turkish Kurdistan September-November 1994
FORCED EVACUATIONS AND DESTRUCTION OF VILLAGES IN DERSIM (TUNCELI), AND WESTERN BINGÖL, TURKISH KURDISTAN SEPTEMBER-NOVEMBER 1994 INTRODUCTION This report details the wave of village evacuations and demolitions, as well as the forest fires that swept across the Dersim region in Turkey, i.e., the province of Tunceli and neighbouring districts, during the autumn of 1994.1 Over a period of two months, around a third of the villages in that province (but in some subdistricts as many as 80 to 100 percent) were evacuated under severe military pressure, and many of them were destroyed and burned down by the army. Thousands of families lost their houses. Moreover large stretches of forest, that only recently had been designated as a nature reserve, were deliberately burnt down. The rationale for all this destruction was the presence of guerrillas of the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), believed to be hiding out in the forests of this province. The inhabitants of the destroyed villages were suspected of giving food and shelter to these guerrillas. Tunceli was not the first province to fall victim to large-scale village evacuations orchestrated by Turkish security forces. The first instances of forced village evacuations in recent years took place in the 1980s, and since 1992 evacuations followed by demolition have been standard practice in sensitive zones of Turkey's Kurdish-inhabited provinces. The Human Rights Associations of Turkey have repeatedly published lists of villages that had been evacuated and destroyed, adding up to well over 2000 names of villages and hamlets. The present report concentrates on the events in Tunceli. -
Wheat Landraces in Farmers' Fields in Turkey. National Survey, Collection
WHEAT LANDRACES IN FARMERS’ FIELDS IN TURKEY NATIONAL SURVEY, COLLECTION ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ AND CONSERVATION, 2009-2014 ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ ©FAО/ Mustafa Kan Mustafa ©FAО/ Alexey Morgounov ©FAO/ WHEAT LANDRACES IN FARMERS’ FIELDS IN TURKEY NATIONAL SURVEY, COLLECTION AND CONSERVATION, 2009-2014 Mustafa KAN, Murat KÜÇÜKÇONGAR, Mesut KESER, Alexey MORGOUNOV, Hafiz MUMINJANOV, Fatih ÖZDEMIR, Calvin QUALSET FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Ankara, 2015 Citation: FAO, 2015. Wheat Landraces in Farmers’ Fields in Turkey: National Survey, Collection, and Conservation, 2009-2014, by Mustafa Kan, Murat Küçükçongar, Mesut Keser, Alexey Morgounov, Hafiz Muminjanov, Fatih Özdemir, Calvin Qualset The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN: 978-92-5-109048-0 © FAO, 2015