DOCSLIB.ORG

A27 Arundel Bypass Report on Further Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A27 Arundel Bypass Report on Further Consultation A27 Arundel Bypass Report on Further Consultation Appendix D: Other written responses from organisations (vol.2) Pacific House (Second Floor) Hazelwick Avenue Three Bridges Crawley RH10 1EX 01293 305965 coast2capital.org.uk By e-mail 23 October 2019 Dear Highways England, I am writing on behalf of Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership in response to Highways England A27 Arundel Bypass Further Consultation. Coast to Capital is a unique business-led collaboration between the private, public and education sectors across a diverse area which includes East Surrey, Greater Brighton and West Sussex. The consultation material summarises well the national and regional significance of the A27, “As the main route serving the south coast, the A27 corridor is crucial to the region’s success. A population of more than 1 million people rely on the A27, and growth plans for the region mean this number is only set to increase.” The need to reduce congestion and improve movement of people and goods along the A27 from Brighton to Portsmouth is widely recognised, specifically in order to increase the local and regional economy, with widespread support for an appropriate intervention at Arundel. The limitations of the A27 are part of a wider picture of infrastructure challenges in the Coast to Capital area that restrict our economic growth compared to other parts of the South East. The national significance of this scheme is recognised in Government’s own 2015-2020 Road Investment Strategy (RIS1). We are pleased that Highways England continues to take a consultative approach to this important scheme. The need to support growth must also be carefully balanced with environmental and social impacts given the setting of existing and proposed routes. This is something that was firmly recognised in the previous consultation exercise and has, in part, lead to these new proposals. We would encourage Coast to Capital Registered in England (One Bell Lane, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 1JU) Company Number: 8166412 Highways England to continue to listen to these concerns in this latest consultation phase. We recognise local support by Arun District Council and West Sussex County Council, as well as other local groups including the Coastal West Sussex Partnership, for Magenta as the preferred route and we would add our own support to it, on balance of minimising social and environmental impact and providing value for money. In short, Cyan and Beige routes are considered to impact too heavily on Arundel itself as well as the South Downs National Park, while Crimson route would also have a heavy impact on the South Downs and a large swathe of Ancient Woodland. This would leave three remaining options – Amber, Magenta and Grey routes. Of these Magenta would be our preference for the reasons of balance stated above. While Magenta route would help to reduce environmental impacts, we would urge Highway’s England to invest in innovative ways to mitigate as far as possible the short and long term impact of the new road, on flora and fauna and local communities. This would include construction methods and materials but also design elements to aid the transit of people and wildlife in particular. Biodiversity gain should be an aspiration of the scheme where possible in terms of habitat creation, rather than simply the minimum degree of loss. We consider that, given the timing of this scheme in relation to the growing understanding and acceptance of climate change risks, it is imperative to design in necessary measures now that will allow us to manage and reduce these risks for the future. We therefore encourage Highways England to think ahead creatively – with us, our partners and with other Government departments – as to future vehicle use of the A27 and other roads. This would apply not only in terms of zero-emission modes of individual transport (i.e. private car and freight vehicles) but also raising the collective ambition to promote and encourage forms of mass transit. Much of the current congestion is exacerbated by local movements across and along stretches of the A27 by private car where no viable public transport or cycling alternative exist and where measures to enable such alternatives to be delivered in the future can be designed in now. The relationship between road and rail networks, as part of future consideration of rail franchising models based on local commuter movement is also key. The consultation material acknowledges that rail take-up is low in the Arundel area, which should not simply be taken as a given but rather an opportunity to balance and reduce future use of the A27. Potential solutions to move longer vehicle journeys off the A27 and onto the West Coastway Rail Service may well lie in the ability to move more local rail journeys onto mass transmit road options, thereby enabling the railway to deliver more express journeys with a net reduction in demand on the road. Coast to Capital Registered in England (One Bell Lane, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 1JU) Company Number: 8166412 We look forward to Highways England’s response to this latest stage of consultation and future design proposals. Yours sincerely, Chief Executive Coast to Capital Registered in England (One Bell Lane, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 1JU) Company Number: 8166412 Coastal West Sussex Partnership Worthing Town Hall Worthing BN1 1HA 3rd October 2019 Dear Colleagues, As the Chair of the CWS Partnership Board, I welcome the opportunity to be able to comment on the scheme proposals to improve the A27 at Arundel. This response has been sent on behalf of the CWS Partnership Board and it is requested that Highways England give due consideration to its contents before making its recommendations to the Secretary of State. The Coastal West Sussex Economic Partnership brings together leaders from business, education and the public sector to work collectively on economic issues that affect the coastal strip. Geographically it covers the areas of Chichester, Adur, Arun and Worthing. Both the CWS Partnership (and its Executive Board) aim to add value and focus on the key ‘"larger than local’" issues that impact on our coastal economy whilst supporting business development and promoting sustainable economic growth across the area. The A27 is the main arterial route along the West Sussex coast and as such, it is the most important transport connection between Portsmouth and Brighton so it is imperative that the A27 works effectively for the benefit of both the local, regional and national economy. In a recent survey carried out by the CWS Partnership, 90% of respondents said the A27 in West Sussex was important to their company In considering the 6 options being proposed for the A27 at Arundel, 3 options would be favoured by the CWS Partnership Board: - Magenta - Amber - Grey These three options all provide a dualling and bypass solution that avoids dividing the town of Arundel and have less impact on the South Downs National Park. Of these three options then the Magenta option would be preferable as it has minimal impact on the SDNP (affecting just under 0.74 acres of the Park) and would be around £50Million less to deliver than the other preferred option that bypass the SDNP completely. Page 1 of 3 We would not support the Beige or Cyan route because of its impact on Arundel and the impact of local traffic trying to access the A27 from the Ford Road. The Crimson route would also not be supported because of its huge impact on the South Downs National Park. In responding to the consultation, the CWS Partnership would also like to encourage Highways England to consider any potential modifications that would: - Consider a full junction option for Ford Road because of the increasing levels of commercial and residential traffic that use this route from the urban centres of Littlehampton and Bognor Regis whilst also future proofing the road network for future development in Ford. - Create appropriate cycle routes that promote commuter opportunities but that also support more leisure cycling and open routes along the River Arun to connect the coastline to Arundel and the South Downs National Park. The dualling options being proposed for the A27 at Arundel are very welcome but we also recognise that there are other obvious bottle necks along the A27 in West Sussex. The CWS Partnership would like to encourage Highways England to take a more holistic and joined up approach to deliver improvements along the whole stretch of the A27 in West Sussex, particularly in Worthing, Lancing and Chichester as collectively, this would have a much greater and more positive impact on the regional economy and yield greater economic return in the longer term. Any infrastructure investment into this area needs to deliver: - Improved journey times - East to West along the whole stretch of the A27 from Brighton to Portsmouth - Improved journey time reliability and resilience against unplanned incidents - Removal of choke points and stop/start traffic need to use longer routes with the consequent poor levels of air quality along the road and in affected towns and villages such as Storrington. - Improve the attractiveness of the area as a place to do business by improving connectivity to/from the West Sussex coast - Better access for visitors to both the coast and the South Downs National Park - A broader recruitment pool for businesses located in the area by improving connectivity to/from urban areas - Improvement in the journey times and access for businesses and residents to the north and south of the A27 - Complement improvements to other transport investment that is already being made; eg A284 Lyminster bypass and the A259 corridor improvements at Littlehampton, because unlike other areas there are few acceptable alternative routes for users to use at times of congestion on the A27.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape Character Types
    Acknowledgements The authors wish to express their gratitude to the various people and organisations that have assisted with the preparation of this landscape character assessment. Particular thanks are due to the members of the Steering Group at Findon Council, Peter Kirk, and Richard Bell. We are grateful for permission to include material from the South Downs National Park Geographic information System (GIS), and our thanks are due to colleagues at South Coast GIS (Paul Day and Matt Powell) who have assisted with this element of the project. Findon Parish Council would also like to gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance from the South Downs National Park Authority, provided to support the preparation of the neighbourhood plan. This study included two workshop sessions, and we are very grateful to the representatives of the Parish Council and neighbourhood planning group who gave up their time to attend the workshops and make helpful comments on the drafts of the study. We have endeavoured to faithfully include relevant suggestions and information, but apologise if we have failed to include all suggestions. The copyright of the illustrations reproduced from other sources is gratefully acknowledged; these are either the British Library (figure 8 ) or Bury Art Museum (figure 10). Whilst we acknowledge the assistance of other people and organisations, this report represents the views of David Hares Landscape Architecture alone. David Hares Lynnette Leeson April 2014 "Landscape means an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors." (European Landscape Convention, 2000) 1 CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Storrington, Sullington and Washington Neighbourhood Plan
    Storrington, Sullington and Washington WASHINGTON PARISH COUNCIL Neighbourhood Plan Dear Sirs Storrington, Sullington & Washington Neighbourhood Plan: Sustainability Appraisal/Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Letter I set out below for your attention the proposed scope of the Sustainability Appraisal/Strategic Environmental Assessment (SA/SEA) to accompany the forthcoming Storrington, Sullington & Washington Neighbourhood Plan (SSWNP). This letter and its appendices should be regarded as the Scoping Report of the SSWNP in accordance with Stage A of the provisions of the Environmental Assessment of Plans & Programmes Regulations 2004 (which implement EU Directive 2001/42). As a statutory consultee in the Regulations you are invited to comment on this report and I would be grateful for your comment by 26th September 2014. Background The SSWNP is being prepared by the Storrington & Sullington Parish Council and Washington Parish Council as qualifying bodies under the 2012 Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations. In accordance with the 2004 Regulations 2004, the local planning authority, Horsham District Council, issued its formal screening opinion on 20 May 2014, concluding that an SEA is required and that it would prefer this is undertaken as part of a wider Sustainability Appraisal (SA/SEA). In its decision, the District Council has not made its reasons explicit for reaching this conclusion, but it is understood that the likely intention of the SSWNP to contain policies allocating land for development is the primary reason. A third of the designated area lies within the South Downs National Park and there are no European sites within the area, although the area does lie within the 15km buffer zone of the Arundel Valley SAC/SPA/Ramsar site.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: Site Assessment Sheets
    APPENDIX 2: SITE ASSESSMENT SHEETS 1 SITE ASSESSMENT SHEETS: MINERAL SITES 2 1. SHARP SAND AND GRAVEL Sharp sand and gravel sites M/CH/1 GROUP M/CH/2 GROUP M/CH3 M/CH/4 GROUP M/CH/6 Key features of sharp sand and gravel extraction Removal of existing landscape features; Location within flatter low lying areas of river valleys or flood plains; Pumping of water to dry pits when below water table; Excavation, machinery and lighting, resulting in visual intrusion; Noise and visual intrusion of on-site processing; Dust apparent within the vicinity of sand and gravel pits; Frequent heavy vehicle movements on local roads; Mitigation measures such as perimeter mounding (using topsoil and overburden) and planting of native trees and shrubs; Replacement with restored landscape, potentially including open water (which may have a nature conservation or recreational value), or returning land to fields, in the long term. 3 GROUP M/CH/1 Figure A1.1: Location map of the M/CH/1 group 4 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER CONTEXT • Wealth of historic landscape features including historic parklands, many ancient woodlands and earthworks. National character area: South Coast Plain (126)1 • Area is well settled with scattered pattern of rural villages and „Major urban developments including Portsmouth, Worthing and Brighton farmsteads. linked by the A27/M27 corridor dominate much of the open, intensively • Suburban fringes. farmed, flat, coastal plain. Coastal inlets and „harbours‟ contain a diverse • Winding hedged or wooded lanes. landscape of narrow tidal creeks, mudflats, shingle beaches, dunes, grazing • Large scale gravel workings‟. marshes and paddocks. From the Downs and coastal plain edge there are long views towards the sea and the Isle of Wight beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the South Downs National Park 2012 Cover and Chapter Photos, Captions and Copyright (Photos Left to Right)
    South Downs National Park Authority State of the South Downs National Park 2012 Cover and chapter photos, captions and copyright (photos left to right) Cover Old Winchester Hill © Anne Purkiss; Steyning Bowl © Simon Parsons; Seven Sisters © South of England Picture Library Chapter 1 Adonis Blue © Neil Hulme; Devil’s Dyke © R. Reed/SDNPA; Walkers on the South Downs Way above Amberley © John Wigley Chapter 2 Black Down ©Anne Purkiss; Seven Sisters © Ivan Catterwell/PPL; © The South Downs National Park Authority, 2012 Amberley Wild Brooks © John Dominick/PPL The South Downs National Park uniquely combines biodiverse landscapes with bustling towns and villages, covers Chapter 3 The river Cuckmere © Chris Mole; Butser Hill © James Douglas; Sunken lanes © SDNPA 2 2 an area of over 1,600km (618 miles ), is home to more than 110,000 people and is Britain’s newest national park. Chapter 4 River Itchin © Nigel Ridgen; Beacon Hill © Nick Heasman/SDNPA; The South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA) is the organisation responsible for promoting the purposes Emperor moth on heathland © NE/Peter Greenhalf of the National Park and the interests of the people who live and work within it. Our purposes are: Chapter 5 Plumpton College Vineyard © Anne Purkiss; Meon Valley © Anne Purkiss; 1. To conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the area. Chanctonbury Ring © Brian Toward 2. To promote opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities of the National Chapter 6 Cuckmere Haven © www.cvcc.org.uk; Devil’s Dyke © David Russell; Park by the public. Butser Ancient Farm © Anne Purkiss Our duty is to seek to foster the economic and social well-being of the local communities within the National Park Chapter 7 The Chattri © SDNPA; Zig Zag path © SDNPA; Cissbury Ring © WSCC/PPL in pursuit of our purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • View Characterisation and Analysis
    South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Project Title: 6298 SDNP View Characterisation and Analysis Client: South Downs National Park Authority Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Director V1 12/8/15 Draft report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V2 9/9/15 Final report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V3 4/11/15 Minor changes to final R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern report Swann South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Bristol Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Edinburgh London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper LUC BRISTOL 12th Floor Colston Tower Colston Street Bristol BS1 4XE T +44 (0)117 929 1997 [email protected] LUC GLASGOW 37 Otago Street Glasgow G12 8JJ T +44 (0)141 334 9595 [email protected] LUC EDINBURGH 28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD T +44 (0)131 202 1616 [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 1 Background to the study 1 Aims and purpose 1 Outputs and uses 1 2 View patterns, representative views and visual sensitivity 4 Introduction 4 View
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Recharge in Sussex & East Kent
    BEACH RECHARGE IN SUSSEX & EAST KENT: A PRELIMINARY INVENTORY & OVERVIEW Compiled by R. Williams, edited by C. Moses. Not to be quoted without permission 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 2 Inventory of beach recharge schemes ..............................................................................5 3 Notes and sources ............................................................................................................9 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................17 5 References......................................................................................................................21 1 Introduction Sand and shingle are being lost from many beaches in Sussex and Kent as a result of natural coastal processes as well as ill-designed sea defence and coastal protection schemes. To counteract falling beach levels, the Environment Agency and local authorities are increasingly resorting to “topping-up” the beaches with additional sand and shingle. Several terms are currently employed to refer to the artificial provision of extra beach material, but there is disagreement about their precise definition. For the purpose of this report, beach nourishment (or beach replenishment) is defined as the supply of material that has been dredged from the seabed or extracted from inland sand and gravel pits. Beach recycling is defined as the removal
    [Show full text]
  • Southdownsview Sharing Stories from Britain’S Newest National Park May–December 2014
    FREE COPYsouthdownsview Sharing stories from Britain’s newest National Park May–December 2014 www.southdowns.gov.uk @sdnpa sdnpa Discover Another Way to enjoy © Cath Harris Find out how you can sit back and relax while exploring the National Park Page 6 Lewes celebrates 750th battle anniversary © Forestry Commission © Forestry The South Discover how Battle of Lewes changed politics forever Downs: Page 19 The return of Full of ratty surprises © John Dominick © John © SDNPA Win a summer’s supply of dog food for your canine friend – page 7 Read about how we are helping water voles Win £250 in our photo competition – page 2 return to the river Meon Page 5 www.southdowns.gov.uk @sdnpa sdnpa Contents Photo competition 2013 winners An inspiring picture capturing the excitement and giddiness of a precious Welcome to the South Downs Fingers crossed for our simple joy of two young children childhood moment,” says Comedian National Park ..............................................3 Biosphere bid! .......................................... 14 running down a hill was chosen as the and actor Hugh Dennis, who lives winner of the South Downs National in the South Downs National Park The National Park in a Nutshell .............3 Places to stay South Downs Park’s ‘Take nothing but pictures’ and helped to judge the competition. National Park ........................................... 14 Cyclists welcome here!.............................4 photo competition 2013. ‘Jump for “We can all remember the sense of Wings on the Downs ............................. 15 Joy’, by Rich Howorth, beat more than freedom of running down a hill, barely Water voles back on the river Meon ....5 100 other entries to win first prize of in control and this picture makes me Inspiring wildlife lovers in the South Notes from a volunteer rive warden ....5 £250.
    [Show full text]
  • EFFECTS on SPECIES and GENETICS Michael
    THE INFLUENCE OF HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY: EFFECTS ON SPECIES AND GENETICS Michael Tink A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Brighton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2017 Abstract Biodiversity describes diversity at different levels of biological organisation, including: habitat diversity; species diversity; and genetic diversity. Understanding the processes that contribute to maintaining biodiversity is a primary concern for both ecology and evolutionary biology. To this end, research into the factors influencing the different levels of biodiversity independently are widespread. However, little is understood about the relationship between the different levels. This study investigates the patterns of habitat, species, and genetic diversity in fragmented internationally important calcareous grasslands, and analyses the spatial and temporal factors influencing them. Finally, the relationship between these levels of biodiversity is examined. Within the South Downs National Park study area, substantial change to habitat diversity and landscape structure was measured between the 1930s and 2012. The transition of semi-natural habitat to agricultural land was the predominate change. Loss of habitat between the 1930s and 2012 was found to influence both species richness and species evenness of vegetation in twelve calcareous grassland study sites. By contrast, none of the variables examined explained the variation in species composition between sites. Further analysis, at the genetic level, for two target species showed that the amount of habitat loss was important in explaining the genetic variation in Cirsium acaule, and soil nutrients were important in explaining the variation of Ranunculus bulbosus. In contrast to the predictions of the species genetic diversity correlation theory, no relationship was established between species and genetic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society
    SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY SOCIETY incorporating SUSSEX MILLS Newsletter GROUP No. 102 Registered Charity No. 267159 Price 50p to non-members APRIL 1999 ISSN 0263 516X MAIN CONTENTS Programme - Spring 1999 Lost Mills of Sussex - Felpham, The tolienne Bailee at Cowfold Black and White Mills C. Shippam Ltd Visit to Gypsum Mines Special Events at Amberley Timber Storage at Shoreham Beach Mills Group News Typological Surveys PROGRAMME - SPRING 1999. Saturday and Sunday May 8th & 9th. National Mills Weekend. Please support your local mill with an offer of help on one of the days. Sunday May 23rd 11.00 arn.Visit to Chichester.Meet at Railway Station, north side. Finish at approximately 4.00 pm with a one-hour lunch break. Contact person Chris Bryan 01243 773 158 Sunday June 13th 12.15 pm Visit to Sir William McAlpine's railway. Contact Ron Martin 01273 271330. All places now allocated. Tuesday June 29th 10.00 am. Visit to Gypsum Mines at Mountfield. 8 members only by special ballot. See page 13. Saturday July 17th 10.30 am. Mills Tour starting at Stone Cross Mill Contact Don Cox 01403 711137 Saturday August 21st 7.00 pm. Members meeting, West Blatchington Mill, (visit to mill 6.00 pm) page 1 THE EOUENNE BOLLEE AT ST. HUGH'S MONASTERY, COWFOLD NICK KELLY/ RON MARTIN The Carthusian monastery of St. Hugh's was built between 1875 and 1883 to the designs of M.Norman of Calais. He brought with him the design of a wind engine, the eolienne Bollee and at least four of these engines were erected on the site for pumping water, only one of which now survives at TQ 201 207.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes of Issues and Options Consultation (Regulation 18)
    West Sussex Joint Minerals Local Plan Single Issue Soft Sand Review – outcomes of Issues and Options Consultation (Regulation 18) January 2020 1 Contents 1. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Aims of engagement ....................................................................................................................... 2 3. Summary of comments and the Authorities responses ................................................................. 2 4. Approach to analysis ....................................................................................................................... 6 Q1a: Which soft sand demand scenario do you think that the Authorities should use? Please provide reasons for your views. .......................................................................................................... 9 Q1b: Do you think that there are any other matters that should be taken into account when determining the need for soft sand? ................................................................................................ 37 Q1c: Do you think that the Authorities should plan for a different amount of soft sand to 2033? Please provide information/evidence to support your view. ........................................................... 57 Q2a: Do you consider that all 'reasonable alternatives' for soft sand supply have been identified or are there other options that we should be considering? ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report
    A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 1-1: South Downs National Park Special Quality Assessment 30 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the report 1-1 1.2 Overview of the project 1-1 1.3 SDNP special qualities 1-2 1.4 Structure of the SDNP special qualities assessment report 1-3 1.5 Legislative and policy framework 1-4 1.6 Sub-regional and local planning policy 1-8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 - SDNP special qualities assessment structure 1-3 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 2-1 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Assessment process 2-1 2.3 Potential impacts 2-3 2.4 Guidance 2-4 2.5 Assessment results 2-12 2.6 Assumptions and limitations 2-13 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 - Types of impact associated with each special quality 2-4 Table 2-2 - Alignment between DMRB and the potential impacts identified 2-6 Table 2-3 - General assumptions and limitations 2-13 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation 3 SPECIAL QUALITY 1: DIVERSE, INSPIRATIONAL LANDSCAPES AND BREATHTAKING VIEWS 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Assessment methodology 3-2 3.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 3-5 3.4 Study Area 3-5 3.5 Baseline conditions 3-5 3.6 Scoping 3-5 3.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement 3-6 3.8 Assessment of potential impacts 3-9 3.9 Summary of landscape character, visual amenity and experience 3-18 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 - Assessment assumptions and limitations for SQ1 3-5 Table 3-2
    [Show full text]
  • SDOS Programme 2021 Version 1.Pdf
    Provisional Events Programme 2021 https://www.sdos.org/ mailto:[email protected] Outings Programme We follow all Government guidelines relating to special precautions resulting from the Covid19 pandemic. Where necessary we will have to severely restrict the numbers of members on field outings and information on how to register for these will be sent by email. You can see up-to-date information on our events on the home page of our website. Month Location Leader Note Sat Jan 9th Pagham Habour - North Wall & Lagoon Bernie Forbes Full Jan Arundel Bernie Forbes Imp Wed. Feb 10th Waltham Brooks Roger Smith Half Thurs Feb 18th Henfield area Val Bentley Half Mar Warnham LNR Brianne Reeve Imp Sun Mar 7th Chichester Marina & Dell Quay Bernie Forbes Full Apr Goring Sea Watch Clive Hope Imp Sat Apr 24th Hope Gap, Cuckmere, Seaford Jen & Tim Holter Half May Woods Mill (Dawn Chorus) Brianne Reeve Imp May Woods Mill (Evening - Nightingales) Val Bentley Imp May Truleigh Hill Terry Goble Imp Fri May 21st Lavington Common Bernie Forbes Eve Tue Jun 1st Iping Common Simon Moffat Half June Bramber Brooks LNR Brianne Reeve Imp Jul Ferring Tricia Hall Imp Aug Thorney Island Clive Hope Imp Sat Sept 4th Cissbury Ring Clive Hope Half Tue Oct 12th Climping Beach & Atherington Clive Hope Half Oct River Adur Walk Tony Benton Imp Nov Beeding Brooks Terry Goble Imp Nov West Dean Woods Bernie Forbes Imp Sat Dec 4th Burpham & The Burgh Bernie Forbes Half Fri Dec 31st Shoreham Beach & Widewater All Half Key:- Imp – Impromptu, Full – Full Day, Half – Half Day Zoom Meetings
    [Show full text]