Cityscape: a Journal of Policy Development and Research • Volume 22, Number 2 • 2020 Cityscape 1 U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cityscape: a Journal of Policy Development and Research • Volume 22, Number 2 • 2020 Cityscape 1 U.S A Journal of Policy Development and Research TWO ESSAYS ON UNEQUAL GROWTH IN HOUSING VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2 • 2020 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research Managing Editor: Mark D. Shroder Associate Editor: Michelle P. Matuga Advisory Board Dolores Acevedo-Garcia Brandeis University Ira Goldstein The Reinvestment Fund Richard K. Green University of Southern California Mark Joseph Case Western Reserve University Matthew E. Kahn University of California, Los Angeles C. Theodore Koebel Virginia Tech Jens Ludwig University of Chicago Mary Pattillo Northwestern University Carolina Reid University of California Patrick Sharkey New York University Cityscape A Journal of Policy Development and Research Two Essays on Unequal Growth in Housing Volume 22, Number 2 • 2020 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research The goal of Cityscape is to bring high-quality original research on housing and community development issues to scholars, government officials, and practitioners. Cityscape is open to all relevant disciplines, including architecture, consumer research, demography, economics, engineering, ethnography, finance, geography, law, planning, political science, public policy, regional science, sociology, statistics, and urban studies. Cityscape is published three times a year by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Subscriptions are available at no charge and single copies at a nominal fee. The journal is also available on line at huduser.gov/periodicals/cityscape.html. PD&R welcomes submissions to the Refereed Papers section of the journal. Our referee process is double blind and timely, and our referees are highly qualified. The managing editor will also respond to authors who submit outlines of proposed papers regarding the suitability of those proposals for inclusion in Cityscape. Send manuscripts or outlines to [email protected]. Opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of HUD or the U.S. government. Visit PD&R’s website, huduser.gov, to find this report and others sponsored by PD&R. Other services of HUD USER, PD&R’s Research and Information Service, include listservs, special interest and bimonthly publications (best practices, significant studies from other sources), access to public use databases, and a hotline (1–800–245–2691) for help with accessing the information you need. Contents Symposium Two Essays on Unequal Growth in Housing ................................................................................. 1 Guest Editor: John Carruthers Note from the Managing Editor .................................................................................................. 3 The Closing of America’s Urban Frontier ................................................................................... 5 by Edward L. Glaeser Housing Inequality in Developing Asia and the United States: Will Common Problems Mean Common Solutions? ........................................................................................ 23 by Toshiaki Aizawa, Matthias Helble, and Kwan Ok Lee Departments ........................................................................................................................... 61 Data Shop Parcel Tax in California: Findings from New Data Sources .................................................... 63 by Soomi Lee Foreign Exchange How Finland Ended Homelessness .......................................................................................... 75 by Marybeth Shinn and Jill Khadduri Graphic Detail Early Interstate Policy and Its Effects on Central Cities ......................................................... 81 by Jeffrey Brinkman and Jeffrey Lin The “Punitive Push” on Mobile Homes .................................................................................... 87 by Graham Pruss and Karen Cheng Industrial Revolution Upcycling Shipping Containers for Houses ............................................................................. 95 by Mike Blanford and Stephen Bender Policy Briefs Opportunity Zones: A Place-Based Incentive for Investment in Low-Income Communities ...................................................................................................... 101 by Daniel Marcin A Comprehensive Look at Housing Market Conditions Across America’s Cities ................ 111 by Anita Yadavalli, Brenna Rivett, James Brooks, and Christiana K. McFarland Cityscape iii Contents SpAM Applying Spaghetti and Meatballs to Proximity Analysis ..................................................... 133 by Alexander Din Referees 2019–20 ..................................................................................................................... 149 Call for Papers Cityscape Symposium on Opportunity Zones ........................................................................ 151 iv Contents Symposium Two Essays on Unequal Growth in Housing Guest Editor: John Carruthers Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research • Volume 22, Number 2 • 2020 Cityscape 1 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development • Office of Policy Development and Research 2 Two Essays on Unequal Growth in Housing Note from the Managing Editor Mark D. Shroder Department of Urban Housing and Development In 2018 I accepted a proposal from John Carruthers of Cornell University to present a symposium in this issue on the housing problems posed for all levels of government by the growth and decline of metropolitan areas. Between our agreement and the deadline for this issue, various barriers to completion of the symposium arose, most notably the coronavirus pandemic that interrupted the work of several participants. As a result, Professor Carruthers was only able to approve two studies that represent contributions to knowledge directly related to the mission of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Although two studies would not constitute a symposium under normal circumstances, we are still fortunate to be able to bring these works to our readers. In “The Closing of America’s Urban Frontier,” Edward Glaeser of Harvard University and the National Bureau of Economic Research notes that the movement of people to productive cities was historically responsible for a large part of the growth in the American economy and living standards, but that in the past 50 years the most productive cities have become resistant to increases in the housing stock. This has been a factor in rising inequality and reduced rates of overall growth. He sees two alternative policy paths for the nation: one in which the states and the Federal government find means of removing local regulatory barriers, and one in which Federal policy increasingly favors relatively depressed areas. In “Housing Inequality in Metropolitan Areas in Developing Asia and the United States: Will Common Problems Mean Common Solutions?” Toshiaki Aizawa of the University of York, Mathias Helble of the Asian Development Bank, and Kwan Ok Lee of the National University of Singapore investigate and contrast housing inadequacy in 10 developing Asian countries and in the United States. The Asian nations are Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Tajikistan, and Timor-Leste. The data source for information on housing in those nations is the Demographic and Health Survey—an ongoing collaboration between the U.S. Agency for International Development and the governments of the named nations; the data source for information on housing in the United States is HUD’s American Housing Survey. The authors find that larger urban areas with greater income inequality tend to have greater amounts of inadequate housing, and they review possible policy responses. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research • Volume 22, Number 2 • 2020 Cityscape 3 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development • Office of Policy Development and Research 4 Two Essays on Unequal Growth in Housing by Edward L. Glaeser The Closing of America’s Urban Frontier Edward L. Glaeser Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research Abstract For most of America’s history, migrants have moved in large numbers from less productive places to more productive places. For the past 150 years, the movement to the urban frontier has been distinctly more economically important than movement to areas with little human settlement. Over the past 50 years, migration to America’s most productive cities has been increasingly checked by the regulation of new construction. The closing of the urban frontier is associated with unaffordable housing, widening gaps in housing wealth, a spatial mismatch between local productivity, population growth, and the end of regional income convergence. One policy response to the change is to encourage state legislatures to take more regulatory power over construction or to provide localities with stronger financial incentives to build. Federal highway funding could be tied to the level of construction in high-demand areas. A second response is to accept the closed urban frontier and to embrace place-based policies that reduce joblessness in depressed areas through employment subsidies, social insurance reform, and experimental vocational training programs. I. Introduction In 1893, Frederick Jackson Turner presented his essay, “The Significance of the Frontier in American History,”
Recommended publications
  • Ending Homelessness in Finland with Housing First CEO Juha Kaakinen OECD Workshop, Paris 25.11.2019 1 Homelessness in Finland 1987- 18000 2027 16000
    Ending Homelessness in Finland with Housing First CEO Juha Kaakinen OECD Workshop, Paris 25.11.2019 1 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 2000 4000 6000 8000 2 0 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1987 in Finland Homelessness 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2027 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 - 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Homelessness in Finland • 5.482 in 2018 (0,1% of the population) • 4.882 single homeless persons (down by 39% since 2008) • 600 in families • Wide definition of homelessness: 70−75% living temporarily with friends and relatives • Low amount of rough sleeping 3 (283) Homelessness in Finland • Long-term homelessness has decreased by 2.435 persons, down by 68% • Its relative share of all single homeless from 45% to 24% since 2008 • The number of long-term homeless 1.162 (2018) 4 Phases of Homelessness Policy in Finland • 1985─2007: Several National Programmes • Welfare legislation • Building new social housing (preventing family homelessness) • Supported housing as part of a staircase model • 2008─2015: Ending Longterm Homelessness • Housing First as the main principle • From temporary to permanent housing • 2016─2019: Programme for Prevention 5 Housing options for Homeless persons in Helsinki Year Supported Independent Hostels and Social housing housing rental shelters apartments apartments 1985 127 65 2.121 35.404 2008 552 2.033 558 68.881 2016 1.309 2.433 52 67.764 6 Government Programme 2019: Eradicating Homelessness within Two Government Terms • Halving homelessness during the government term and eradicating homelessness within two government terms by 2027.
    [Show full text]
  • European Homelessness and COVID-19 3
    European Homelessness and COVID 19 Nicholas Pleace Isabel Baptista Lars Benjaminsen Volker Busch Geertsema Eoin O’Sullivan Nóra Teller Acknowledgements This report draws on research, interviewing homelessness service providers and reviewing available information, conducted within the home countries of the members of the European Observatory on Homelessness (EoH): Isabel Baptista (Portugal); Lars Benjaminsen (Denmark); Volker Busch-Geertsema (Germany); Eoin O’Sullivan (Ireland), Nóra Teller (Hungary) and, in 2020, prior to leaving the EU, the UK (Nicholas Pleace). The most recent EoH comparative research for the 10th report in the series, exploring staffing in homelessness services in Europe1, was conducted as COVID-19 was causing the first waves of lockdowns. The result of this work, which covered the immediate impacts of COVID-19 on homelessness services in: Belgium; Croatia; the Czech Republic; Denmark; Finland; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Italy; the Netherlands; Poland; Portugal; Slovenia; Spain; and the UK, are also drawn upon on here. The report also draws on a range of other resources, including FEANTSA’s own data collection, analysis by the Deputy Director, Ruth Owen, and inputs from the Director, Freek Spinnewijn. As always, the work of EoH presented here benefits from Mike Allen’s (Focus Ireland) input and comments. Sources from outside Europe are also used in trying to understand and consider the possible long-term effects of COVID-19 on homelessness and housing exclusion as the pandemic continues to unfold. People working in homelessness services across Europe also supported the research at an extremely challenging time. Our sincere thanks are due to all those who contributed both directly and indirectly to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9
    This is a repository copy of The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services : EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/158131/ Version: Published Version Monograph: Pleace, Nicholas orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-2667, Baptista, Isabel, Benjaminsen, Lars et al. (1 more author) (2020) The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services : EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9. Research Report. FEANTSA , Brussels. Reuse ["licenses_typename_other" not defined] Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ European Observatory on Homelessness The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services 9 EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness Brussels 2019 Acknowledgements This research was based on questionnaire responses from 16 European Union member states. Each questionnaire was completed by an expert in homelessness, with additional expertise being drawn upon where necessary. Our sincere thanks to everyone who supported this piece of research. It is not possible to include every detail of the information collected through the questionnaires, though the authors have worked to try to ensure equal representation of each country and every effort has been made to report the information shared with us accurately. Readers should note that there
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish National Programme to Reduce Long-Term Homelessness
    PEER REVIEW IN SOCIAL PROTECTION AND SOCIAL INCLUSION 2010 THE FINNISH NATIONAL PROGRAMME TO REDUCE LONG-TERM HOMELESSNESS HELSINKI, 2–3 DECEMBER 2010 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the European Commission Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion PEER REVIEW IN SOCIAL PROTECTION AND SOCIAL INCLUSION 2010 THE FINNISH NATIONAL PROGRAMME TO REDUCE LONG-TERM HOMELEssNEss VOLKER BUSCH-GEERTSEMA AssOCIATION FOR INNOVATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH AND SOCIAL PLANNING (GISS, BREMEN, GERMANY) HELSINKI, 2–3 DECEMBER 2010 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the European Commission Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion This publication is supported for under the European Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity (2007–2013). This programme is managed by the Directorate-Generale for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission. It was established to financially support the implementation of the objectives of the European Union in the employment and social affairs area, as set out in the Social Agenda, and thereby contribute to the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy goals in these fields. The seven-year Programme targets all stakeholders who can help shape the development of appropriate and effective employment and social legislation and policies, across the EU-27, EFTA-EEA and EU candidate and pre-candidate countries. PROGRESS mission is to strengthen the EU contribution in support of Member States’ commitments and efforts to create more and better jobs and to build a more cohesive society. To that effect, PROGRESS will be instrumental in: • providing analysis and policy advice on PROGRESS policy areas; • monitoring and reporting on the implementation of EU legislation and policies in PROGRESS policy areas; • promoting policy transfer, learning and support among Member States on EU 2 objectives and priorities; and • relaying the views of the stakeholders and society at large.
    [Show full text]
  • New Deal for Housing Justice: a Housing Playbook for the New
    New Deal for Housing Justice A Housing Playbook for the New Administration JANUARY 2021 About this Publication New Deal for Housing Justice is the result of the input, expertise, and lived experience of the many collaborators who participated in the process. First and foremost, the recommendations presented in this document are rooted in the more than 400 ideas shared by grassroots leaders and advocates in response to an open call for input launched early in the project. More than 100 stakeholder interviews were conducted during the development of the recommendations, and the following people provided external review: Afua Atta-Mensah, Rebecca Cokley, Natalie Donlin-Zappella, Edward Golding, Megan Haberle, Priya Jayachandran, Richard Kahlenberg, Mark Kudlowitz, Sunaree Marshall, Craig Pollack, Vincent J. Reina, Sherry Riva, Heather Schwartz, Thomas Silverstein, Philip Tegeler, and Larry Vale. Additional information is available on the companion website: http://www.newdealforhousingjustice.org/ Managing Editor Lynn M. Ross, Founder and Principal, Spirit for Change Consulting Contributing Authors Beth Dever, Senior Project Manager, BRicK Partners LLC Jeremie Greer, Co-Founder/Co-Executive Director, Liberation in a Generation Nicholas Kelly, PhD Candidate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Rasmia Kirmani-Frye, Founder and Principal, Big Urban Problem Solving Consulting Lindsay Knotts, Independent Consultant and former USICH Policy Director Alanna McCargo, Vice President, Housing Finance Policy Center, Urban Institute Ann Oliva, Visiting
    [Show full text]
  • Y Foundation Finland
    Y-FOUNDATION 1 (3) Pitkänsillanranta 3 A, PL 322 00531 Helsinki, Finland Designing and implementing effective human rights-based housing strategies: answers to the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to housing - Finland and the Y-Foundation Briefly about the work of the Y-Foundation The Finnish Y-Foundation offers rental accommodation for people who are having difficulties in finding a home for themselves. The Y-Foundation operates in over 50 cities and municipalities with over 16 000 apartments. Apartments are acquired through the purchase of individual homes in housing companies and by developing apartment blocks for rental purposes all over Finland. The capital region as well as other major cities and areas of growth are particular areas of focus when it comes to procuring accommodation. The subletting of individual apartments is at the core of the foundation’s activities, and the majority of apartments are sublet to municipalities, parishes or to other partners. In addition to subletting, the Y-Foundation also owns apartments, mostly in the capital region, which it rents out directly to applicants. Residents are selected based on the applicant’s need for housing and the applicants for the apartments come mainly through our partners. In addition to purchasing individual apartments, the Y-Foundation also develops apartment blocks. Construction takes place based on local needs and wishes. Construction projects have included both regular rental accommodation as well as units for special groups allowing for support services. The foundation is actively involved as a national developer of the Housing First principle, which is fast gaining ground especially in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of Homelessness
    European Observatory on Homelessness European Observatory on Homelessness European Journal European Journal of Homelessness Homelessness of Homelessness The European Journal of Homelessness provides a critical analysis of policy and practice on homelessness in Europe for policy makers, practitioners, researchers and academics. The aim is to stimulate debate on homelessness and housing exclusion at the Journalof European level and to facilitate the development of a stronger evidential base for policy development and innovation. The journal seeks to give international exposure to significant national, regional and local developments and to provide a forum for comparative analysis of policy and practice in preventing and tackling home- lessness in Europe. The journal will also assess the lessons for European Europe which can be derived from policy, practice and research from elsewhere. European Journal of Homelessness is published twice a year by FEANTSA, the European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless. An electronic version can be down- loaded from FEANTSA’s website www.feantsaresearch.org. FEANTSA works with the European Commission, the contracting authority for the four-year partnership agreement under which this publication has received funding. The information contained in this publication does not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the European Commission. ISSN: 2030-2762 (Print) n 2030-3106 (Online) Volume 10, No. 3 _ 2016 10th Anniversary Issue n European Federation of National Associations Working with the Homeless AISBL Fédération Européenne d’Associations Nationales Travaillant avec les Sans-Abri AISBL 194, Chaussée de Louvain n 1210 Brussels n Belgium Tel.: + 32 2 538 66 69 n Fax: + 32 2 539 41 74 Issue Anniversary th [email protected] n www.feantsaresearch.org 10 Volume 10, No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Right to Housing
    P1: FAW/FAW P2: FAW GRBT106-INTRO GRBT106-Bratt December 7, 2005 15:37 Char Count= 0 Rachel G. Bratt, Michael E. Stone and Chester Hartman WhyaRight to Housing Is Needed and MakesSense: Editors’ Introduction IT IS UNCONSCIONABLE that in the larger fissures between the nation’s richest and 21st century, upwards of 100 million people in most of the rest of us—but most especially the theUnitedStatesliveinhousingthatisphysically poorest among us—disparities that have a clear inadequate, in unsafe neighborhoods, over- racial dimension as well and that make true crowded or way beyond what they realistically democracy impossible. can afford. Yet it could be quite different. We Just over 60 years ago, in his 1944 State of the could and should guarantee high-quality, truly Union address to Congress, President Franklin affordablehousingin“good”neighborhoodsfor Delano Roosevelt declared that economic secu- all and thus finally achieve the National Housing rity is a necessary ingredient for a democratic Goal of “a decent home and a suitable living en- society. He further asserted that there was a need vironment for every American family,” as artic- for a whole series of economic and social rights, ulated by Congress over a half-century ago in the including a Right to Housing. This is part of his 1949 Housing Act and reaffirmed in subsequent message: legislative initiatives.1 This book embraces the view that a commitment to a Right to Housing We havecometoaclearrealizationofthefactthat should be the foundation not only for housing true individual freedom cannot exist without policy but also for a new social agenda. economic security and independence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Path to Housing Justice in California Facing History, Uprooting Inequality: a Path to Housing Justice in California
    Facing History, Uprooting Inequality: A Path to Housing Justice in California Facing History, Uprooting Inequality: A Path to Housing Justice in California Amee Chew with Chione Lucina Muñoz Flegal About This Report This report was produced by PolicyLink with funding from the Melville Charitable Trust. Acknowledgments We are deeply grateful to our community partners who served We thank Michelle Huang at PolicyLink and the USC Equity on the Advisory Committee of this report, for their expertise, Research Institute for data analysis; Heather Tamir at PolicyLink guidance, and insights: for editorial support; Jacob Goolkasian for layout and design; Guadalupe Garcia for logistical support; and Kakuna Kerina for • Alexandra Suh and José Roberto Hernández, Koreatown thorough copyedits. Immigrant Workers Alliance • Anya Lawler and Alexander Harnden, Western Center on We are grateful to the Melville Charitable Trust for supporting Law and Poverty this project. • Ashley Werner, Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability • Camilo Sol Zamora and Cat Kung, Causa Justa :: Just Cause • Christina Livingston, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment • Cynthia Strathmann, Strategic Actions for a Just Economy • D’Artagnan Scorza and Jelani Hendrix, Uplift Inglewood and Social Justice Learning Institute ©2020 PolicyLink. All rights reserved. • Deborah Thrope and Mariel Block, National Housing Law Project Cover, lower left: In 1963, hundreds of NAACP-CORE members • Jennifer Martinez, PICO California and supporters march in Torrance for fair
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Successful Housing Outcomes After Homelessness: an Experience Captured Through the Lens of U.S
    Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations 2021 An exploration of successful housing outcomes after homelessness: an experience captured through the lens of U.S. Veterans Janice Filer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd Part of the Leadership Studies Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Public Administration Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and Psychology AN EXPLORATION OF SUCCESSFUL HOUSING OUTCOMES AFTER HOMELESSNESS: AN EXPERIENCE CAPTURED THROUGH THE LENS OF U.S. VETERANS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Global Leadership and Change by Janice Filer July, 2021 June Schmieder, Ph.D. – Dissertation Chair This dissertation, written by Janice Filer under the guidance of a Faculty Committee and approved by its members, has been submitted and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Doctoral Committee: June Schmieder, Ph.D., Chairperson Kfir Mordechay, Ph.D., Committee Member Wilisha Daniels, Ph. D., Committee Member © Copyright by Janice Filer (2021) All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Policy: Exploring the Challenges, Opportunities, and Governmental Responses to America’S Housing Crisis a Federal Policy Primer
    Housing Policy: Exploring the Challenges, Opportunities, and Governmental Responses to America’s Housing Crisis A Federal Policy Primer May 2020 SUMMIT STRATEGIES GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS 440 1ST STREET NW, STE 440 WASHINGTON DC 20001 WWW.SUMMITSTRATEGIES.US Supplemental Material: CARES Act Housing Provisions While the majority of this white paper examines the existing federal housing policy infrastructure, this section highlights the relevant housing policy provisions of the recently enacted Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The CARES Act is the most substantial fiscal stimulus in U.S history, providing more than $2 trillion to bolster the healthcare system, support households, backstop businesses, and alleviate budgetary issues for state and local governments. The measure includes supplemental funding for critical federal housing resources, such as the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and various rental assistance programs. The package provides relief for renters and homeowners with federally backed loans through eviction protection, mortgage forbearance, and renter protections. The bill provides the CDBG program with an added $5 billion, approximately $1.6 billion more than the program received through FY2020 appropriations. The additional funding includes $2 billion for states and units of local governments that typically receive CDBG formula funding and $1 billion for state governments to support a coordinated response across entitlement and non-entitlement communities. The remaining $2 billion goes to states and units of local government based on the prevalence and risk of COVID-19 and related economic and housing disruption. Additionally, the legislation removes the cap on funds that a CDBG grantee can spend on public services. It also allows CDBG grantees to be reimbursed for COVID-19 response activities, regardless of when the costs occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • How Greens in Government Are Tackling Homelessness
    How Greens in Government Are Tackling Homelessness Article by Samir Jeraj April 7, 2021 From Helsinki to Brighton, Greens in local governments have been working to find lasting solutions to the persistent problem of homelessness, often drawing inspiration from pioneering policies from around the world and calling for a shift in understanding and response measures. Green proposals have brought about significant progress at many different levels of government, yet the current climate threatens to set back these efforts. Although the onset of Covid-19 was an impetus to find solutions, many of the policies addressing homelessness during the pandemic are temporary and thus liable to be rolled back, while funding cuts imposed by recovery policies risk worsening the situation. More than 700,000 people sleep rough across Europe on any given night, according to data from the European Parliament. This figure has risen by 70 per cent in the past decade, as rents in cities spiralled, social housing shrank, and governments grappled with the impact of the 2008 financial crash. Millions more live in temporary housing, informal shelters, and on couches and floors of friends, family, and acquaintances. The profile of people who are homeless varies across Europe, and it is difficult to get a clear picture as there is no cross-EU data. However, a comparison of national data reveals that some groups are more at risk than others, and that picture is changing. Undocumented migrants, who do not have access to social protection are at high risk across Europe, and make up over half of rough sleepers in some cities in Europe, such as in the Spanish capital of Madrid.
    [Show full text]