Wyoming Coal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Powder River Basin Coal Resource and Cost Study George Stepanovich, Jr
Exhibit No. MWR-1 POWDER RIVER BASIN COAL RESOURCE AND COST STUDY Campbell, Converse and Sheridan Counties, Wyoming Big Horn, Powder River, Rosebud and Treasure Counties, Montana Prepared For XCEL ENERGY By John T. Boyd Company Mining and Geological Consultants Denver, Colorado Report No. 3155.001 SEPTEMBER 2011 Exhibit No. MWR-1 John T. Boyd Company Mining and Geological Consultants Chairman James W Boyd October 6, 2011 President and CEO John T Boyd II File: 3155.001 Managing Director and COO Ronald L Lewis Vice Presidents Mr. Mark W. Roberts Richard L Bate Manager, Fuel Supply Operations James F Kvitkovich Russell P Moran Xcel Energy John L Weiss 1800 Larimer St., Suite 1000 William P Wolf Denver, CO 80202 Vice President Business Development Subject: Powder River Basin Coal Resource and Cost Study George Stepanovich, Jr Managing Director - Australia Dear Mr. Roberts: Ian L Alexander Presented herewith is John T. Boyd Company’s (BOYD) draft report Managing Director - China Dehui (David) Zhong on the coal resources mining in the Powder River Basin of Assistant to the President Wyoming and Montana. The report addresses the availability of Mark P Davic resources, the cost of recovery of those resources and forecast FOB mine prices for the coal over the 30 year period from 2011 Denver through 2040. The study is based on information available in the Dominion Plaza, Suite 710S 600 17th Street public domain, and on BOYD’s extensive familiarity and experience Denver, CO 80202-5404 (303) 293-8988 with Powder River Basin operations. (303) 293-2232 Fax jtboydd@jtboyd com Respectfully submitted, Pittsburgh (724) 873-4400 JOHN T. -
King Coal Historic Mine Byway
King Coal Historic Mine Byway Interpretive Plan “Wyodak coal mine near Gillette, WY, Val Kuska July – Aug 1930” (Wyoming State Archives, Kuska Collection, File 661-680) T O X E Y • M C M I L L A N D E S I G N A S S O C I A T E S • L L C 218 Washington Street, San Antonio, TX 78204 • O: 210-225-7066 • C: 817-368-2750 http://www.tmdaexhibits.com • [email protected] Interpretive Plan 1 “Coal? Wyoming has enough with which to run the forges of Vulcan, weld every tie that binds, drive every wheel, change the North Pole into a tropical region or smelt all Hell.” —Fenimore Chatterton, Wyoming Secretary of State, 1902 This interpretive plan was developed by Toxey/McMillan Design Associates between 2014 and 2017 under contract from the Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office. The project scope was revised in 2016 at the request of the Wyoming SHPO and local project participants. This document reflects a historical perspective on the Campbell County Coal Industry rather than current events and economic conditions. Interpretive Plan 2 Table of Contents Introduction to the Project p. 5 Interpretive Significance p. 6 Project Goal p. 9 Intent of the Interpretive Plan p. 10 Methodology and Development Process p. 10 Audience Profile p. 11 Visitor Needs p. 18 Project Objectives p. 19 Underlying Theme p. 21 Name Considerations p. 21 Interpretation Topics and Subtopics p. 22 Storyline Development p. 24 Route Recommendation p. 118 Media Plan and Recommendations p. 130 Cost Estimates p. 135 References p. -
Environmentalassessment.Pdf
MISSION STATEMENT It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Managment to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/WY/PL-06/011+1320 WY-070-EA06-139 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On July 24, 2003, Caballo Coal Company filed an application with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to exchange portions of two federal coal leases located to the south and east, and adjacent to the Caballo Mine in Campbell County, Wyoming, approximately 10 miles south of Gillette, Wyoming (Figure ES-1). The application was made as an Alluvial Valley Floor (AVF) coal lease exchange under the regulations at 43 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 3436, Coal Lease and Coal Land Exchanges: Alluvial Valley Floors. The Caballo Mine is owned and operated by Caballo Coal Company, a subsidiary of Powder River Coal Company. In this environmental assessment (EA), the applicant for the tract will be referred to as PRCC. The Gold Mine Draw tract as offered and the existing federal coal leases in the adjacent Caballo Mine are shown in Figure ES-2. The Gold Mine Draw tract includes approximately 921.6 acres and an estimated 67.2 million tons of in-place coal reserves. The Gold Mine Draw Tract has been determined to be an Alluvial Valley Floor significant to farming by the WDEQ Land Quality Division. On August 9, 2004, the BLM issued a decision that the applicant is qualified for the exchange and that all of the offered lands are qualified for an exchange. -
Task 1D Report for the Powder River Basin Coal Review Current Environmental Conditions
Environment Submitted to: Submitted by: Bureau of Land Management AECOM High Plains District Office and Fort Collins, Colorado Wyoming State Office December 2012 Task 1D Report for the Powder River Basin Coal Review Current Environmental Conditions AECOM ES-1 ES.1.0 Executive Summary This Task 1D Report for the Powder River Basin (PRB) Coal Review describes the existing environmental conditions in the Wyoming PRB study area, with the exception of air quality, water resources, and social and economic conditions (which are presented in standalone Task 1 reports) and cultural resources, which is addressed in the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Cultural Class I Regional Overview - Buffalo Field Office. The descriptions of current environmental conditions in this report are based on published and unpublished information; information obtained from local, state, and federal agencies and industrial companies; and a compilation of past and present actions in the Wyoming PRB developed for the Task 2 Report for the PRB Coal Review (AECOM 2011). The past and present actions summarized in the Task 2 report include surface coal mines (currently 13 are active in the Wyoming PRB study area), oil and gas development, power plants, railroads, coal technology facilities, major transmission lines, other mines, major pipelines, reservoirs, and other industrial and non-industrial developments. Descriptions of the past and present activities identified in the Task 2 report were based on the most recent data available as of the end of base year 2008. For the purpose of this study, the Wyoming PRB study area comprises all of Campbell County, all of Sheridan and Johnson counties, less the Bighorn National Forest lands to the west of the PRB, and the northern portion of Converse County. -
Guide to Coal Mines ______
GUIDE TO COAL MINES __________________________________________________ Served by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway The information included in this Guide to Coal Mines Served by Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway was provided by the coal producing companies. It includes general information, from coal specifications to loading characteristics, about the coal and mine facilities. The producers who contributed information to this Guide have included the name, address and phone number of their primary marketing contact. Requests for further information regarding these mines should be addressed to the appropriate producer marketing contact. Produced and Published by Coal Business Unit Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway P. O. Box 961051 Fort Worth, Texas 76161-0051 Fax: (817) 352-7939 Internet Address: [email protected] - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________ BNSF AND COAL 4 BNSF COAL MARKETING ORGANIZATION 5 MONTANA / WYOMING_____________________________________________ 6 MONTANA/WYOMING - POWDER RIVER BASIN MAP 8 POWDER RIVER BASIN - MONTANA Kennecott Spring Creek Mine 9 Kiewit/Kennecott Decker Mine 10 Peabody Holding Co. Inc./Powder River Coal Company Big Sky Mine 11 Westmoreland Absaloka Mine 12 Rosebud Mine 13 POWDER RIVER BASIN - WYOMING Arch Black Thunder Mine 14 Coal Creek Mine 15 RAG American Belle Ayr Mine 16 Eagle Butte Mine 17 Western Fuels – Wyoming, Inc. Dry Fork Mine 18 Kennecott Antelope Mine 19 Caballo Rojo Mine 20 Cordero Mine 21 Fort Union Mine 22 Jacobs Ranch Mine 23 Peabody Holding Co. Inc./Powder River Coal Company Caballo Mine 24 North Antelope/Rochelle Complex 25 Rawhide Mine 26 Wyodak Clovis Point Mine 27 Vulcan Buckskin Mine 28 North Rochelle Mine 29 COLORADO / NEW MEXICO______________________________________ 30 RATON BASIN Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining York Canyon Mine 32 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) SAN JUAN BASIN National King Coal King Coal Mine 33 Peabody Holding Co. -
Task 1D Report for the Powder River Basin Coal Review, Current
Task 1D Report for the Powder River Basin Coal Review Current Environmental Conditions Prepared for Bureau of Land Management Casper Field Office and Wyoming State Office Submitted by ENSR Corporation Fort Collins, Colorado June 2005 TASK 1D REPORT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN COAL REVIEW CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Prepared for BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT CASPER FIELD OFFICE and WYOMING STATE OFFICE Submitted by ENSR CORPORATION Fort Collins, Colorado June 2005 Executive Summary ES.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Task 1D Report for the Powder River Basin (PRB) Coal Review describes the existing environmental conditions in the PRB study area, with the exception of air quality, water resources, and social and economic conditions, which are presented in individual baseline (Task 1) reports. The descriptions of current environmental conditions in this report are based on published and unpublished information; information obtained from local, state, and federal agencies and industrial companies; and a compilation of past and present actions in the Wyoming PRB developed for the Task 2 Report for the PRB Coal Review. The past and present actions summarized in the Task 2 report include surface coal mines (currently 12 are active and 1 is temporarily inactive), power plants, railroads, coal technology facilities, major transmission lines, other mines, oil and gas development, major pipelines, reservoirs, and other industrial and non-industrial developments. Descriptions of the past and present activities identified in the Task 2 report were based on the most recent data available at the end of 2003. For the purpose of this study, the Wyoming PRB study area comprises all of Campbell County, all of Sheridan and Johnson counties less the Bighorn National Forest lands to the west of the PRB, and the northern portion of Converse County. -
Coal Lease Application Wyw150210 Campbell County, Wyoming
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT RECORD OF DECISION NARO NORTH FEDERAL COAL LEASE APPLICATION WYW150210 CAMPBELL COUNTY, WYOMING INTRODUCTION Powder River Coal Company filed an application with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to lease two tracts of Federal coal as maintenance tracts for the North Antelope/Rochelle Complex on March 10, 2000. The two tracts are referred to as the NARO North and NARO South Lease By Application (LBA) Tracts. A maintenance tract is a tract of Federal coal that is adjacent to and can be mined by an existing coal mine. Powder River Coal Company, a subsidiary of the Peabody Holding Company, Inc., operates the North Antelope/Rochelle Complex, which is adjacent to the NARO North and NARO South LBA Tracts. In 2003, the North Antelope/Rochelle Complex was renamed the North Antelope Rochelle Mine. For the purposes of consistency with the South Powder River Basin Coal Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the mine is referred to as the North Antelope/Rochelle Complex in this Record of Decision. BLM determined that the NARO North and NARO South LBA Tracts would be processed separately, that a separate decision would be made to hold a lease sale for each tract, and that they would be offered for sale separately. This Record of Decision is for the NARO North LBA Tract only. The NARO North LBA Tract was assigned case file number WYW150210. As applied for, it includes approximately 2,369.38 acres and Powder River Coal Company estimates that the tract includes an estimated 323 million tons of in-place Federal coal reserves in Campbell County, Wyoming. -
Exxonmobil Coal and Minerals Company Ibla 97
EXXONMOBIL COAL AND MINERALS COMPANY IBLA 97- 207 Decided May 21, 2003 Appeal from a decision of the Associate Director for Policy and Development, Minerals Management Service, requiring payment of additional royalty in connection with production from federal coal leases. (MMS-92-0674-MIN.) Affirmed. 1. Coal Leases and Permits: Royalties--Mineral Leasing Act: Royalties The pre-Mar. 1, 1989, regulations governing valuation of coal for royalty purposes prohibit the deduction of the costs of loading from gross value in determining value for Federal royalty purposes. Where the coal purchasers pay fees for loading coal, MMS properly requires the lessee to add those fees to the sales price of the coal to determine value for Federal royalty purposes. 2. Coal Leases and Permits: Royalties--Mineral Leasing Act: Royalties The coal valuation regulations effective Mar. 1, 1989, provide that the term “gross proceeds” for royalty purposes includes payments for certain services, including loading coal, to the extent that the lessee is obligated to perform them at no cost to the lessor. APPEARANCES: M. Julia Hook, Esq., Denver, Colorado, and Judy L. Fernald, Esq., Houston, Texas, for appellant; Howard W. Chalker, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, Washington, D.C., for the Minerals Management Service. 159 IBLA 106 IBLA 97-207 OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE ROBERTS ExxonMobil Coal and Minerals Company (ExxonMobil or Exxon) has appealed an April 30, 1996, decision of the Associate Director for Policy and Development, Minerals Management Service (MMS), requiring payment of additional royalty in connection with production from Federal coal leases comprising the Rawhide and Caballo coal mines near Gillette, Wyoming. -
Environmental Overview Report and Feasibility Study
December 2014 Environmental Overview Report and Feasibility Study Prepared for: Prepared by: December 2014 Contents Page No. 1.0 What is the Wyoming Highway 59 Relocation Project? .................................................... 1 2.0 Why is WYDOT Considering Relocating WYO 59?.......................................................... 1 3.0 What Decision is WYDOT Making? ................................................................................. 1 4.0 What Alternatives Did WYDOT Consider? ....................................................................... 3 4.1 No-Build Alternative ..................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Relocate WYO 59 (Build Alternative) ........................................................................... 5 4.3 Alternatives Not Considered for Further Analysis ......................................................... 7 4.4 Proposed Connecting Route ........................................................................................ 7 5.0 What Resources are in the Area and How Would They be Affected with the Relocation of WYO 59? .................................................................................................. 9 5.1 Resources Present .....................................................................................................13 Surface Waters, Floodplains, and Wetlands ..................................................................13 Wildlife and Vegetation ..................................................................................................16 -
Coal Resource Study for the Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Hearing Exhibit 101, Attachment AKJ-2_Appendix F_ Coal Resource Study Proceeding No. 21A______E Page 1 of 44 Coal Resource Study for the Colorado Public Utilities Commission For Public Service Company of Colorado March 2021 Colorado PUC E-Filings System Prepared by Burnham Coal, LLC Denver, Colorado Hearing Exhibit 101, Attachment AJK-2_Appendix F_ Coal Resource Study Proceeding No. 21A______E Page 2 of 44 Table of Contents Definitions/Abbreviations Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 US and Powder River Basin Coal Production and Demand ................................................ 2 US Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2020 ........................... 6 PRB Geology and Mining ................................................................................................................... 7 Geology ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Mining Technology .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Transportation ......................................................................................................................................