Texas Ports: Essential to the Economy TXDOT and the MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Texas Ports: Essential to the Economy TXDOT and the MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TxDOT Maritime Division Texas Ports: Essential to the Economy TXDOT AND THE MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FAST FACTS 1.8 MILLION jobs supported by the port industry ( 12.5% since 2015)1 TEXAS PORTS: 597.5 MILLION total tons of cargo moved ESSENTIAL TO makes Texas 1st in U.S. maritime commerce THE ECONOMY ( from 2nd place in 2018)2 Generating over $242 billion in annual overall trade, Texas ports play an essential role in driving $102 BILLION the Texas economy.3 In 2019, Texas became the personal income and local number one state in maritime commerce by tonnage, consumption supported overtaking Louisiana. Three of the top five ports in by the port industry the U.S. based upon tonnage were in Texas with Port ( 11% since 2015)1 Houston becoming the tonnage leader among U.S. ports for the first time.2 Even during the coronavirus pandemic, Texas ports stayed in business— $7.8 BILLION protecting jobs, bolstering the economy, and keeping state/local tax shelves stocked with food and medical supplies for revenue generated by consumers. Despite the effects of the pandemic and port industry in part due to the strong export market for oil and gas, ( 13% since 2015)1 Texas ports continue to thrive. Page 1 Texas Ports: Essential to the Economy TxDOT Maritime Division TxDOT Maritime Division Texas Ports: Essential to the Economy Ports Port of Port of Orange Deep Draft Channel Beaumont TEXAS MARITIME Shallow Draft Channel Cedar Bayou Navigation District Port of SYSTEM AND NEEDS Shallow Draft Recreational Channel Anahuac Highways Port Houston Port of The Texas maritime system includes 11 deep draft ports, eight shallow draft Port Arthur ports, two recreational shallow draft ports, and the 379-mile-long Texas arm of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW). Ports are a vital part of the national freight 0 30 60 network, helping farmers move their product to markets overseas, bringing raw Sabine Neches ! Miles Navigation District materials to Texas manufacturers and clothes, electronics, and other consumer ° Port of Texas City goods to all Texans. All of the Texas ports are interconnected by the GIWW, a shallow draft channel that links intrastate barge traffic with ocean-going vessels and handles both domestic and foreign trade. Port of Port Freeport Texas ports are critical to the economic growth of Texas and affect all Texans. Galveston The total economic value of the port and maritime cargo activity provided by the Port of GIWW Texas ports and GIWW was estimated at just under $450 billion in 2018.1 To better Bay City $56.8 million support Texas businesses, the maritime industry must continually improve port Calhoun average estimated annual Port Authority facilities, waterways, inland connectivity to the ports, and the GIWW via maritime maintenance costs improvement projects. Port project needs are outlined in the 2022-2023 Texas Port Mission Plan. Port of Victoria Port of Deep Draft Ports Palacios MARITIME PROJECT TYPES $323 million PROJECT TYPE DESCRIPTION Port of average project West Calhoun Port facility improvements inside the gates include berth backlog per port Port Facilities expansions, terminal developments, cargo laydown area expansions, and dock improvements. Shallow Draft Ports Projects are federally authorized construction projects for Ship Channels $19.7 million waterway deepening and widening. average project Aransas Co. Projects outside the gates improve interchanges and intersections, Navigation District backlog per port Inland Connectivity reduce congestion and improve mobility, enhance safety, improve rail and bridge crossings, and improve pedestrian access. Port of Corpus Christi Projects include maintenance dredging, identifying new dredged Authority Gulf Intracoastal material placement areas (DMPAs), and construction for navigation Waterway Gulf of improvements. Mexico Brazos River Floodgates & Colorado River Locks Other GIWW Needs 1. Maintenance Dredging 2. Dredged Material The Brazos River Floodgates & Colorado River Locks are outdated The Corps does not receive adequate Placement Areas structures that contribute to significant safety hazards and navigational delays funding to maintain the GIWW to its Dredged Material Placement Areas, or on the GIWW. Beginning in 2016, TxDOT partnered with the U.S. Army Corps of Port of authorized dimensions. Just one foot of DMPAs, are sites that are authorized to Port Mansfield Engineers to analyze various modifications to modernize these new facilities. The lost draft across the GIWW system increases contain dredged material after it is extracted improvements outlined in the study would reduce bottlenecks and allisions on costs for barge operators by $58.7 million from waterways. New DMPA acquisitions the GIWW that currently cause up to 12-hour-long delays. annually, a 14.8 percent increase in the will be needed over the next several years Port of cost of doing business.4 The average as existing DMPA capacity decreases. The This priority project was authorized by Congress in the Water Resources Harlingen annual cost to maintain the GIWW to cost to ensure that TxDOT can make timely Development Act of 2020. Before construction on the planned improvements its authorized depth is $56 million. In FY acquisitions of future DMPAs is estimated to can begin, the project must receive funding from Congress, which is typically 2020, the U.S. Army Corps dedicated $40.4 be $1.6 million per biennium. done via an Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act. The one-time million—nearly 40 percent less than what is construction cost is estimated at $409.7 million and will be borne entirely by the Barge approaching the Colorado River Locks Port of needed—to maintenance dredging. federal government. along the GIWW. Port Isabel Port of Page 2 Brow nsville Page 3 Re d Ri AR ve r E xp an si NM on R e d O a W k ink to LA Mi W dla eb R nd st ed to er E Ri AR Texas Ports: Essential to the Economy ch ve TxDOT Maritime Division TxDOT Maritime Division Texas Ports: Essential to the Economy o 3 r Ex pa E n P si NM IC on UNITED STATES VOLATILITY IN THE ENERGY MARKETS TEXAS R Percent Change in Energy e V d o k ya During 2019 and 2020, leading petroleum producers Saudi Arabia and Russia 5 a g O er Exports from Ports in Texas O a d ( increased exports to increase their world market shares. This increase in supply, k e ! W R Houston ink Beaumont combined with the coronavirus pandemic, caused a decrease in the world demand LNG Petroleum Crude Oil to LA Mi W 150% dla E eb for petroleum and resulted in an oversupplied market. The resulting drop in crude +138% nd P ste to IC r Ec oil prices below the cost of production significantly impacted Texas producers. As Midla ho cho 4 (! nd t o3 E Freeport a result, weekly exports at Texas ports declined by almost half from June 2019 to 100% Jupiter E ( PIC ( June 2020, when exports began to rebound. UNITED STATES 50% +44% +40% The trickle-down effects associated with the volatility in the energy markets +17% TEXAS ( 0% ! !!( Vo and subsequent loss of business impact port revenues over the long term. The 0% k yag LNG Terminals a G er -10% -3% Corpu Os d ( uncertain future for the energy market has had repercussions for future planned -19% ! Operational Cheristi ! R Houston -50% Beaumont pipelines, offshore crude terminals, and LNG export terminals in Texas. -46% ( Under Development E Crude Terminals P I G u l f ! MEXICO C Jan 2019-Dec 2019 (pre-pandemic) Operational Mid ho 4 (! o f Pipelines land to Ec Freeport G Suspended M e x i c o It was expected that 2019 and 2020 would be record years for crude pipeline and Jan 2020-July 2020 Jupiter ( ( Under Development ( buildout projects. With the global pandemic, only a quarter of the planned pipeline Jan 2019-July 2020 (overall) ((( Crude Pipelines Brownsville capacity miles were constructed in 2020, and most pipeline construction projects Operational have been deferred to 2021 or later. Without the construction of anticipated (! ( Under Construction ! ! pipelines, the receiving ports (namely, Houston, Corpus Christi, Beaumont, LNG Terminals G Deferred or On Hold Corpus Freeport) may be forced to defer expansion and capital improvement projects. Percent Change in Energy ! Operational Christi Delayed ( Under Development Export Prices from Ports Crude Terminals Deepwater Crude 5 MEXICO G u l f in Texas ! Operational o f Offshore oil terminals can load Very Large Crude Carriers, vessels with drafts too large G Suspended M e x i c o to dock in most Texas ports. Constructing deepwater crude terminals would improve LNG Petroleum Crude Oil ( economies of scale for exporting oil by allowing these largest crude-carrying vessels 20% Under Development +13% +12% ((( Crude Pipelines Brownsville to load. Several offshore terminals are planned for exporting oil from Texas, but their sponsors have delayed submitting permit applications because of lower prices and OpeMARITIMErational ADAPTS 0% market uncertainty. The viability of new offshore oil terminals also depends upon the Under Construction -6% Deferred or On Hold construction of additional pipelines to transport crude oil through Texas. The only -20% DelaTOyed NEW REALITIES operational offshore oil terminal in the U.S. was completed in 1981 for imports. -25% -27% -26% -32% -34% PORTS PLAY PIVOTAL ROLE DURING 2020 PANDEMIC LNG Export Terminals -40% -34% Liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports have increased rapidly in the U.S. since the Jan 2019-Dec 2019 (pre-pandemic) While they feature significantly in the state and national Although container vessel traffic was disrupted for several first shipment in 2016, and the two LNG terminals in Texas completed in 2018 economies under normal circumstances, Texas ports months and ports nationwide had challenges maintaining and 2019 now dominate U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Latest Annual Report
    Annual Report 2017 3461 Carmen Ave. Rancho Viejo, TX 78575 (956) 621-5571 ON THE COVER Freight truck passing through State Highway 550 (I-169), Port Spur Table of Contents Message from Chairman ..................................................................1 Message from Executive Director ......................................................2 Why the RGV ...................................................................................3 Overview ...........................................................................................5 Projects State Highway 550/Interstate 169 .....................................................7 Toll Processing Services ....................................................................9 South Padre Island Second Access ................................................. 11 State Highway 32 .............................................................................13 Highlights Financials .........................................................................................15 Community Outreach .................................................................... 17 Message From The Chairman Since our creation in 2004, objectives that focus on strategic the Cameron County Regional corridor development, which help Mobility Authority (CCRMA) achieve quality transportation has made signifcant progress to within our county and region. fnd new and innovative tools to The CCRMA will continue reduce the problems of congestion to be recognized as a leader in and connectivity while facilitating Texas
    [Show full text]
  • Galveston, Texas
    Galveston, Texas 1 TENTATIVE ITINERARY Participants may arrive at beach house as early as 8am Beach geology, history, and seawall discussions/walkabout Drive to Galveston Island State Park, Pier 21 and Strand, Apffel Park, and Seawolf Park Participants choice! Check-out of beach house by 11am Activities may continue after check-out 2 GEOLOGIC POINTS OF INTEREST Barrier island formation, shoreface, swash zone, beach face, wrack line, berm, sand dunes, seawall construction and history, sand composition, longshore current and littoral drift, wavelengths and rip currents, jetty construction, Town Mountain Granite geology Beach foreshore, backshore, dunes, lagoon and tidal flats, back bay, salt marsh wetlands, prairie, coves and bayous, Pelican Island, USS Cavalla and USS Stewart, oil and gas drilling and production exhibits, 1877 tall ship ELISSA Bishop’s Palace, historic homes, Pleasure Pier, Tremont Hotel, Galveston Railroad Museum, Galveston’s Own Farmers Market, ArtWalk 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS • Barrier Island System Maps • Jetty/Breakwater • Formation of Galveston Island • Riprap • Barrier Island Diagrams • Town Mountain Granite (Galveston) • Coastal Dunes • Source of Beach and River Sands • Lower Shoreface • Sand Management • Middle Shoreface • Upper Shoreface • Foreshore • Prairie • Backshore • Salt Marsh Wetlands • Dunes • Lagoon and Tidal Flats • Pelican Island • Seawolf Park • Swash Zone • USS Stewart (DE-238) • Beach Face • USS Cavalla (SS-244) • Wrack Line • Berm • Longshore Current • 1877 Tall Ship ELISSA • Littoral Zone • Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Texas U.S. Ports of Entry
    Texas U.S. Ports of Entry www.BusinessInTexas.com TEXAS PORTS OF ENTRY Overview U.S. Ports of Entry Ports of Entry are officially designated areas at U.S. For current or further information on U.S. and Texas land borders, seaports, and airports which are ports, check the CBP website at approved by U.S. Customs and Border Protection www.cbp.gov/border-security/ports-entry or contact (CBP). There are 328 official ports of entry in the the CBP at: U.S. and 13 preclearance offices in Canada and the Caribbean. 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20229 Port personnel are the face at the border for most Inquiries (877) 227-5511 cargo and visitors entering the United States. At International Callers (202)325-8000 Ports, CBP officers or Port employees accept entries of merchandise, clear passengers, collect duties, Texas Ports of Entry enforce the import and export laws and regulations of the U.S. federal government, and conduct Texas currently has 29 official U.S. ports of entry, immigration policy and programs. Ports also perform more than any other state, according to the CBP agriculture inspections to protect the nation from website. The map below provides details. potential carriers of animal and plant pests or diseases that could cause serious damage to the Information on the Texas ports of entry follows, in nation's crops, livestock, pets, and the environment. alphabetical order, in the next section. U.S. Ports of Entry In Texas 1 TEXAS PORTS OF ENTRY Texas Ports of Entry P ort of Entry: Addison Airport Port Information Port Code: 5584 Port Type: User Fee Airport Location Address: 4300 Westgrove Addison, TX 75001 General Phone: (469) 737-6913 General Fax: (469) 737-5246 Operational Hours: 8:30 AM-5:00 PM (Central) Weekdays (Monday-Friday) Brokers: View List Directions to Port Office DFW Airport: Take hwy 114 to Addison Airport Press Office Field Office Name: Houston Location Houston, TX Address: 2323 S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Departmental Map
    TRAVEL INFORMATION Dial 1-800-452-9292 for travel assistance from a professional Texas travel counselor, including routing in Texas, emergency road condition information, and other travel services; or to register a comment or Departmental Map 2014complaint about department operations.° 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W To Boise City OKLAHOMA To Boise City To Guymon To Guymon To Liberal To Beaver 2586QR NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS Texhoma 296 287 2248 1454 To Clayton OP m 1262 /(83 Booker QR QR l QR 15 2741 1290QR 1261 43 QR To Shattuck 815 O981P 896 2677 QR 1267 Darrouzett 15 1655 2450 35 B377 1192 OP OP Texline QR /(54 2349 QR 23 Follett 43 QR QR Ray QR 3356 3133 296 QR 143 43 Pilot 289 QR QR 78 Leonard OP 119 BA PERRYTON 1455 sr mlE 65 5 43 OP 3214 377 QR 455 /(77 Roberts Point 21 /( DALLAM 20765 QR OP 2172 2741 OP 1190 455 2862 69 807 143 QR QR QR Lake OP B289 QR OP 1290 2535 BA /(87 1879 STRATFORD QR QR 455 65C E 78 QR 192 455 2164 OP Weston a Anna 43 15 BA 305 OP Sanger QR s 455 43 136 65 1204QR 51 455 t OP 385 1262 65 1261 ef 377 OP F 981 QR QR 2450 o 455 OP ml 2232 3004 QR B35 ml r OP 296 QR 3045 QR 2153 Celina k OP 2387 15 QR 2711 sr QR /(75 121 278 r 2862 /(54 2014 15 OP QR 43 QR WISE X 2478 T 65 QR LIPSCOMB e QR r QR 43 Gruver i 981 376 iv 3524 n Blue Ridge 1562 NORTH CENTRAL QR i OP QR 1573 760 OP R t 3110 3213 287 QR OP 1385 y QR QR m @84 70 LIPSCOMB 188 2164 QR 545 B78 l SHERMAN ? 43 BA 730 QR 428 R Melissa OP 65 2018 ( OP y Aubrey 428 / i 2899 SPEARMAN 81 3163 t OP 543 v D QR 1454
    [Show full text]
  • November 14, 2019 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy
    Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP 1801 California Street, Suite 4900 Denver, Colorado 80202 O +1 303 830 1776 F +1 303 894 9239 squirepattonboggs.com John R. Sharp T +1 303 894 6183 [email protected] November 14, 2019 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy Docket Room 3F-056, FE-50 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 Dear Ms. Sweeny: Enclosed please find SeaOne Corpus Christi, LLC's application for authority to export natural gas contained in or mixed with Compressed Gas Liquid ("CGL"TM) to certain Free Trade Agreement ("FTA") countries in or adjoining the Caribbean Basin and Gulf of Mexico. SeaOne intends to use the Port of Corpus Christi as the point of export of CGL to power generation facilities to be constructed in Colombia in fulfillment of several recently awarded power tenders in the Pacific and Central regions in Colombia as well as a government-sanctioned concession for the development of a major energy port in Buenaventura, Colombia (Puerto Solo) that has provisional Colombian government approval to import as much as 1.9 Million barrels per a day of fuels and feedstocks. Service for these operations will require CGL transport vessels larger than those which can be efficiently operated out of SeaOne’s Gulfport facility. We have entered into land lease negotiations with the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, as well as with private landowners within the Port, regarding SeaOne's use of a location within the Port. Conclusion of these negotiations will be contingent on completion of the Department of Energy ("DOE") FTA authorization process, and will be finalized upon issuance of an order approving this application.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonds Are a Backup Plan for Texas Port's Ship Channel
    Bonds are a Backup Plan for Texas Port's Ship Channel By Richard Williamson Published August 31 2018, 11:28am EDT DALLAS – The Port of Brownsville, Texas, may use revenue bonds to finance dredging operations to accommodate larger vessels but is keeping the option in reserve for now, officials said. “Revenue bonds are on the table only as a means of last resort,” said Steve Tyndal, senior director of marketing and business development at the port. The Port of Brownsville wants to deepen its ship channel to 52 feet from the current 42 feet to accommodate larger vessels. Like other ports around the nation, Brownsville -- managed by the Brownsville Navigation District -- wants to deepen its 17-mile ship channel to 52 feet from its current 42 feet to handle the larger ships coming through the expanded Panama Canal and deeper-draft tankers carrying U.S. energy exports. But like the other ports, Brownsville must wait for federal funding and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before the $200 million project can begin. “The cost is challenging, especially for an emerging port like Brownsville,” said BND board secretary Sergio Tito Lopez. The larger Port of Corpus Christi, 150 miles up the Gulf Coast, is issuing its own bonds to finance the dredging in anticipation of eventual federal funding. In March, the commission that governs the nation’s fourth-largest port by tonnage voted to issue up to $400 million of bonds to dredge the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. The port has been seeking the promised federal funds for 28 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook
    TTI: 0-6890 Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook Technical Report 0-6890-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6890-P1.pdf PORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION REINVESTMENT ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDEBOOK by: Rafael M. Aldrete Abhisek Mudgal Senior Research Scientist Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sharada Vadali Juan Carlos Villa Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Carl James Kruse Lorenzo Cornejo Research Scientist Assistant Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute David Salgado Deog Sang Bae Associate Transportation Researcher Graduate Assistant Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Product 0-6890-P1 Project 0-6890 Project Title: Tools for Port TRZs and TRZs for Multimodal Applications Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation Published: March 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this product reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports and Courts Update
    Texas Ports and Courts Update March 2021 1. COVID-19 Ports Update We have collected and summarized these items to In response to decreasing COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations, the help keep you apprised of the latest news and Governor of Texas recently rescinded statewide public occupancy developments from the ports and courts on the restrictions and mask mandates. Businesses are free to enforce their Texas coast. own restrictions, and many have kept their previous requirements in place. Texas port/terminal facilities nearly uniformly continue to require the same preventative measures (e.g., masks, temperature checks, physical distancing, etc.) despite the Governor’s recent announcement. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Coast Guard, and many vessel agents continue to board vessels and conduct activities in person. Vessels still need to advise CBP and Coast Guard boarding teams of any In this Update: crew illnesses prior to embarkation. Vessels are also required to notify the Coast Guard Captain of the Port of any crewmember showing symptoms consistent with COVID-19. 1. COVID-19 Ports Update Rapid COVID-19 testing is generally available, and test administrations can be scheduled and completed in relatively short timeframes. 2. Recent Port Activity & Shore leave remains allowed. Crew changes/repatriation requests are Development Projects permitted on a case-by-case basis. Off-signing crewmembers are generally required to proceed directly to 3. News from the Courts the airport for their flights, and overnight hotel stays are typically not permitted. CBP is generally requiring the following items in relation to a crewmember’s repatriation requests: (1) passport bio page; (2) C1/D visa; (3) I-95 landing permit; and (4) e-tickets with direct flights departing the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report State of the Bay: a Characterization of the Galveston
    Final Report State of the Bay: A Characterization of the Galveston Bay Ecosystem, Third Edition Submitted for completion of Contract #: 582-8-84951 Submitted By: Lisa A. Gonzalez, PI Geotechnology Research Institute (GTRI) Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) 4800 Research Forest Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77381 Prepared For: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Galveston Bay Estuary Program 17041 El Camino Real, Suite. 210, Houston, Texas 77058 Submitted To: Kelly Holligan Director, Water Quality Planning Division and Project Representative Texas Commission on Environmental Quality P.O. Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087 January 2012 Prepared in Cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The preparation of this report was financed through grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................3 Galveston Bay Status and Trends Project ...............................................................................................................3 State of the Bay, 3rd Edition ...................................................................................................................................4 Galveston Bay Ecosystem Services Workshop .......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2017 Emissions Inventory Report
    Port of Corpus Christi Authority 2017 Air Emissions Inventory Prepared for: September 2019 Prepared by: Port of Corpus Christi Authority 2017 Air Emissions Inventory TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Reason for Study .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Study ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Pollutants ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2.2 Temporal Extent ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Emission Source Categories .................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Geographical Domain ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Marine-side Geographical Domain ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Land-side Geographical Domain .......................................................................................................... 5 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review: 2018
    PORT OF GALVESTON 2018 YEAR IN REVIEW CRUISING ALONG Cruise ships in port The Port of Galveston is Texas’ No. 1 Cruise Port and ranks as the fourth busiest cruise port in North America. It is one of the top 20 cruise homeports in the world. Cruise volume is growing consis- tently. The Port of Galveston embarked about 985,163 passengers in 2018 due to the largest-ever capacity commitment by the cruise industry to Texas. These deploy- ments are expected to carry more than 1,034,000 passengers in 2019. Total sail- ings increased from 255 in 2017 to 268 in 2018 and are projected to be 299 this year. [ AT THE HELM ] BOARD OF TRUSTEES E .L. “TED” O’ROURKE The Port of Galveston announced that it achieved a new suggest that we will continue to surpass records throughout Chairman milestone in 2018, with 1,966,176 passenger movements, 2019. We look forward to continuing the success of our cruise surpassing previous passenger volumes and setting a record operations with our cruise partners”, said CEO and Port Director, ALBERT P. SHANNON as the busiest year since the port began its cruise business Rodger Rees. “I’d like to thank Port staff and longshoremen for Vice Chairman on September 30, 2000. In addition, the Port achieved their hard work and City council, the local business community ELIZABETH BEETON another significant milestone in December; it welcomed its 10 and tourism partners for their continued support. Their efforts millionth cruise passenger since beginning cruise operations. have helped the Port of Galveston maintain the rank of 4th RICHARD D.
    [Show full text]