Harvey Mitigation Competition Application CDBG-MIT Public Notice October 12, 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harvey Mitigation Competition Application CDBG-MIT Public Notice October 12, 2020 Harvey Mitigation Competition Application CDBG-MIT Public Notice October 12, 2020 Project: Nueces County Living Breakwater Introduction: Nueces County is giving notice of its intent to submit an application to the Texas General Land Office (GLO) for funds through the Community Development Block Grant – Mitigation (CDBG-MIT) program as lead applicant, with the Port of Corpus Christi as a joint applicant. In particular, the County will seek funding for public infrastructure and flood mitigation measures for their Living Breakwater Project. The proposed project will improve the resiliency of the County and surrounding communities that sustained damage Hurricane Harvey. The CDBG-MIT program is funded through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and administered at the state level by the Texas General Land Office (GLO). Applications are due to GLO by October 28, 2020 and awards are expected in 2021. Nueces County will receive public comments for fourteen (14) days from the date of this posting until October 26, 2020. The public is encouraged to submit comments to Maria Bedia via email at [email protected] or at Nueces County Court House, 901 Leopard Street, Corpus Christi, TX, 78401. All comments must be received by 5:00pm on October 26, 2020. Comments will be incorporated into the draft application documents, as appropriate. The application will prioritize the mitigation of the devastating effects of natural disasters, as well as ensure the project is in line with environmental regulations, affirmatively furthering fair housing activities, and, if applicable, minimizing displacement of persons by project activities. Upon the expiration of this comment period, Nueces County will review and address the public comments in the proposed application. For more information, contact Maria Bedia at (361) 888-0224. Scope: Nueces County and the entire Corpus Christi Bay area are vulnerable to a variety of coastal hazards, including hurricanes/tropical storms, coastal flooding, and erosion, as described in their multi- jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan. Several major storms have hit the area in the last several years. Hurricane Harvey passed almost directly over the Corpus Christi Bay in 2017, causing surge inundation and major shoreline damage. More recently, Hurricane Hanna made landfall in July 2020, resulting in significant water levels and wave heights that further compromised the shorelines, roadways, and private structures around the Bay. Select, key mitigation interventions are needed around the Bay to augment and leverage the range of shoreline stabilization and erosion control projects that have been constructed throughout the Corpus Christi Bay area to protect the communities from storm-related hazards. The shoreline at North Beach is particularly vulnerable to storm surge. North Beach also suffers from frequent flooding due low elevation and drainage challenges. The North Beach area is an economic development asset to the region and is home to the Texas State Aquarium and the USS Lexington. Construction of living breakwaters off of North Beach will stabilize the shoreline, helping to mitigate potential erosion and storm surge inundation to protect homes and public infrastructure in the area while providing critical habitat. This infrastructure project would protect and enhance those assets already located in North Beach, a main source of economic benefits for the region, and would foster new investment. Another critical area of Corpus Christi Bay is the Port Aransas shoreline. This area has been experiencing increased erosion over the last decade, up to 2-3 feet per year, to its vulnerable location near the Gulf of Mexico. Implementation of a living breakwater in this location would stabilize the shoreline, reduce erosion and the impacts of coastal flooding, protect homes and public infrastructure in the area, and encourage natural colonization of critical habitat. Ingleside on the Bay is also particularly vulnerable flooding from tropical storms and sea level change. Portions of the Ingleside on the Bay shoreline are also vulnerable to wave overtopping due to vessel activity in the La Quinta Channel. Installation of elevated bulkheads, living breakwaters, or other mitigation structures in this area would reduce regular nuisance flooding and reduce the severity of storm surge flooding during tropical events. Nueces County, with the Port of Corpus Christi, is requesting CDBG-MIT funding to mitigate flood and storm impacts through the construction of coastal resilience improvements in strategic locations around Corpus Christi Bay. The funding would be used for data collection, design, permitting, preparation of construction specifications, and construction of structures that will help mitigate coastal hazards while providing habitat in the form of submerged aquatic substrate and intertidal wetlands. The proposed interventions are also complimentary to ongoing Nueces Bay marsh restoration efforts and the Indian Point shoreline erosion protection project. National Objective: Urgent Need – Mitigation. This project meets the Urgent Need Mitigation National Objective as it will result in measurable and verifiable reductions in the risk of loss of life and property from future disasters and yield community development benefits. While the Low to Moderate Income (LMI) population throughout the entire benefitting area is lower than the required 51% and the project does not qualify under an LMI National Objective, there are still significant concentrations of LMI populations throughout the benefitting jurisdictions. The entire service area contains LMI census tracts with significant concentration of LMI populations. Budget: The anticipated total cost for this project is $99,856,213.50. Nueces County and the Port of Corpus Christi have committed to providing 1% leverage, $998,562.13. $98,857,651.40 in CDBG-MIT funding is being requested. A detailed cost estimate is attached. Service Area: The service area for this project is Corpus Christi Bay area, including the Corpus Christi, Port Aransas, and Aransas-Pass Ingleside CCDs. A service area map is attached. CDBG-MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs (Former Table 2) Cost Verification Controls must be in place to assure that construction costs are reasonable and consistent with market costs at the time and place of construction. Applicant/Subrecipient: Nueces County Site/Activity Title: GLO Submerged Lands - Corpus Christi Bay Eligible Activity: Natural or Green Infrastructure Materials/Facilities/Services $/Unit Unit Quantity Construction Acquisition Total North Beach Breakwaters Mobilization & Demobilization $ 10,000,000.00 LS 1 $ 10,000,000.00 $ - $ 10,000,000.00 Construction Surveying $ 500,000.00 LS 1 $ 500,000.00 $ - $ 500,000.00 Hazard Surveying $ 300,000.00 LS 1 $ 300,000.00 $ - $ 300,000.00 BMP's $ 300,000.00 LS 1 $ 300,000.00 $ - $ 300,000.00 Dredging $ 21.00 CY 950,000 $ 19,950,000.00 $ - $ 19,950,000.00 Armor Stone $ 265.00 CY 110,000 $ 29,150,000.00 $ - $ 29,150,000.00 Bedding Stone $ 180.00 CY 55,000 $ 9,900,000.00 $ - $ 9,900,000.00 Geotextile $ 8.00 SY 20,000 $ 160,000.00 $ - $ 160,000.00 Landscaping $ 5,900,000.00 LS 1 $ 5,900,000.00 $ - $ 5,900,000.00 Port Aransas Breakwater $ - 0 $ - $ - $ - Mobilization & Demobilization $ 400,000.00 LS 1 $ 400,000.00 $ - $ 400,000.00 Construction Surveying $ 60,000.00 LS 1 $ 60,000.00 $ - $ 60,000.00 BMP's $ 25,000.00 LS 1 $ 25,000.00 $ - $ 25,000.00 Armor Stone $ 265.00 CY 5,200 $ 1,378,000.00 $ - $ 1,378,000.00 Bedding Stone $ 180.00 CY 2,000 $ 360,000.00 $ - $ 360,000.00 Geotextile $ 8.00 SY 4,500 $ 36,000.00 $ - $ 36,000.00 Ingleside on the Bay Bulkhead Mobilization & Demobilization $ 250,000.00 LS 1 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ 250,000.00 Construction Surveying $ 50,000.00 LS 1 $ 50,000.00 $ - $ 50,000.00 BMP's $ 25,000.00 LS 1 $ 25,000.00 $ - $ 25,000.00 Bulkhead $ 2,350.00 LF 1,350 $ 3,172,500.00 $ - $ 3,172,500.00 TOTAL $ 17,813,277.00 $ 81,916,500.00 $ - $ 81,916,500.00 1. Identify and explain the annual projected operation and maintenance costs associated with the proposed activities. No anticipated operations and maintenance costs 2. Identify and explain any special engineering activities. Not anticipated Date: Phone Number: Signature of Registered Engineer/Architect Responsible For Seal Budget Justification: Engineering 15% of Construction $12,287,475 Administration 6% of Total Project $5,652,238.50 Total Project Budget $99,856,213.50 Living Breakwaters Coastal Protection Nueces County, TX Project Area Project Area Project Area Total Beneficiary Population: 310,215 Geographies Nueces County Project Areas Source: HUD Low-Moderate Income Dataset, American Community Survey (2011-2015). Basemap: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS 0 3.5 7 Miles ± Living Breakwaters Coastal ProtectionProtectio n Nueces County, TX Geographies Total Beneficiary Population: 329,180 Nueces County Source: HUD Low-Moderate Income Dataset, American Community Survey (2011-2015). 0 3 6 County Subdivision Beneficiaries Basemap: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS km ±.
Recommended publications
  • November 14, 2019 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy
    Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP 1801 California Street, Suite 4900 Denver, Colorado 80202 O +1 303 830 1776 F +1 303 894 9239 squirepattonboggs.com John R. Sharp T +1 303 894 6183 [email protected] November 14, 2019 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy Docket Room 3F-056, FE-50 Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 Dear Ms. Sweeny: Enclosed please find SeaOne Corpus Christi, LLC's application for authority to export natural gas contained in or mixed with Compressed Gas Liquid ("CGL"TM) to certain Free Trade Agreement ("FTA") countries in or adjoining the Caribbean Basin and Gulf of Mexico. SeaOne intends to use the Port of Corpus Christi as the point of export of CGL to power generation facilities to be constructed in Colombia in fulfillment of several recently awarded power tenders in the Pacific and Central regions in Colombia as well as a government-sanctioned concession for the development of a major energy port in Buenaventura, Colombia (Puerto Solo) that has provisional Colombian government approval to import as much as 1.9 Million barrels per a day of fuels and feedstocks. Service for these operations will require CGL transport vessels larger than those which can be efficiently operated out of SeaOne’s Gulfport facility. We have entered into land lease negotiations with the Port of Corpus Christi Authority, as well as with private landowners within the Port, regarding SeaOne's use of a location within the Port. Conclusion of these negotiations will be contingent on completion of the Department of Energy ("DOE") FTA authorization process, and will be finalized upon issuance of an order approving this application.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 Texas State Aquarium Board of Trustees
    Texas State Aquarium Texas State Aquarium 2710 N. Shoreline Corpus Christi, Texas 78402-1097 361.881.1200 texasstateaquarium.org RECYCLES ANNUAL REPORT 2012 TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM BOARD OF TRUSTEES Lee R. Jordan Chair Judith Hawley Past-Chair Deneece Ann Squires Vice Chair DEAR FRIENDSDEAR FRIENDS Bruce S. Hawn Vice Chair Denise Tavares Secretary Paula Dodd Treasurer Some of you Smightome orecallf you that mig h2t0 1re1call was th aat banne 2011r w yeasar a fobar nnerthe Aqua year rfiumor t; hethe Aq openinguarium ; ofthe th ope ening of the Larry McKinney At Large Member HEB Splash PaHErkB h Selpedplash dPraivrke haelped 12% incdrirveasee a 12in% annual increase attendanc in annueal. Afteratten daann cexcee. Apftionallter any exceptionally Rich D. Tuttle At Large Member Larry Urban At Large Member pleased to repoWret toar eyo pleau in sthised atonn urealpo reprto rtot tha yot,u b yt halatm, ostby analmosty measu arney, 201meas2 wasure , anothe2012 r was another extraordinaryext yerarao frodir ntheary Tyeeaxasr foStater the Aqu Texasari uSmtat. eOur Aq uattendancearium. Our to atteppendda 560,nce 0topped00, makin 560g ,000, making Trustees Robert W. Maxwell, Jr. 2012 our busiest201 2ye oarur since busie gsrtand yea ro sipeningnce g,r aandnd opeup aboutning, a 4n%d uovp eabor 20u11t 4. % W oev egener 201rated1. W ove egenr erated over Joe Adame Robert A. May $10 million in$1 op0e millioratingn rienv enuopeerati, anotherng reve highnue, amanotrkher for h uigsh. Tmhaer k for us. The Esperanza Andrade Julie McNeil opening of Stingopenrayin gLago of oStingn, theray secondLagoon , majorthe s ecomponentcond major ocompof nent of Barry Andrews Mark Meyer our new Master Plan, was a big hit and certainly helped our Allen G.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management of Commercially Important Species
    ECOSYSTEM -BASED FISHERIES MANAGEMENT OF COMMERCIALLY IMPORTANT SPECIES : DESIGNING A NETWORK OF REFUGIOS IN BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR , MEXICO PREPARED BY RYAN ARNOTT LIAM CARR MITTY MOHON ANNA SANTOS FRANCES TOLEDO SARAH TRIMBLE CARENA J. VAN RIPER JACKIE ZIEGLER UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. WILLIAM HEYMAN TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY , DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY DOCUMENT PREPARED APRIL 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1. RATIONALE FOR COOPERATIVE & ADAPTIVE SPATIAL MANAGEMENT 5 1.2. SPATIAL MANAGEMENT – THE BAJA MEXICO PERSPECTIVE 6 1.3. FISHERIES OVERVIEW 7 1.4. ECOSYSTEM -BASED FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 8 1.5. STUDY OBJECTIVES 8 2. SITE DESCRIPTION 8 2.1. GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION 8 2.2. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION – GEOLOGIC SETTING 9 2.3. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION – CLIMATE 9 2.4. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION – OCEANOGRAPHY 9 2.5. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION – COASTAL PEDOLOGY & VEGETATION 11 2.6. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION – MARINE ECOSYSTEM 11 3. SOCIAL & ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CORREDOR 12 3.1. LEGAL CONTEXT OF LOCALIZED FISHERIES MANAGEMENT IN THE CORREDOR 12 3.2. CORREDOR FISHERIES & COMMUNITIES 13 4. METHODOLOGY 14 4.1. SPATIAL ANALYSES 14 4.2. BIOLOGICAL & ECOLOGICAL ANALYSES 15 4.3. CASE STUDIES 15 5. RESULTS & DISCUSSION 15 5.1 BIOPHYSICAL DESCRIPTION & BATHYMETRY 15 5.2. SPATIAL COMPARISON OF FISHER GENERATED MAPS WITH SELECTED 18 ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA 5.3. CASE STUDIES 19 6. CONSIDERATIONS 24 6.1. ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS 24 6.2. GOVERNANCE CONSIDERATIONS 24 6.3. CASE STUDY LESSONS & CONSIDERATIONS 25 7. MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS 26 7.1. ECOLOGICAL TOOLS TO ENHANCE CONSERVATION 26 7.2. GOVERNANCE TOOLS TO ENHANCE CONSERVATION 26 7.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports and Courts Update
    Texas Ports and Courts Update March 2021 1. COVID-19 Ports Update We have collected and summarized these items to In response to decreasing COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations, the help keep you apprised of the latest news and Governor of Texas recently rescinded statewide public occupancy developments from the ports and courts on the restrictions and mask mandates. Businesses are free to enforce their Texas coast. own restrictions, and many have kept their previous requirements in place. Texas port/terminal facilities nearly uniformly continue to require the same preventative measures (e.g., masks, temperature checks, physical distancing, etc.) despite the Governor’s recent announcement. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Coast Guard, and many vessel agents continue to board vessels and conduct activities in person. Vessels still need to advise CBP and Coast Guard boarding teams of any In this Update: crew illnesses prior to embarkation. Vessels are also required to notify the Coast Guard Captain of the Port of any crewmember showing symptoms consistent with COVID-19. 1. COVID-19 Ports Update Rapid COVID-19 testing is generally available, and test administrations can be scheduled and completed in relatively short timeframes. 2. Recent Port Activity & Shore leave remains allowed. Crew changes/repatriation requests are Development Projects permitted on a case-by-case basis. Off-signing crewmembers are generally required to proceed directly to 3. News from the Courts the airport for their flights, and overnight hotel stays are typically not permitted. CBP is generally requiring the following items in relation to a crewmember’s repatriation requests: (1) passport bio page; (2) C1/D visa; (3) I-95 landing permit; and (4) e-tickets with direct flights departing the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Front Cover
    Potential Sites for Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, and Creation: Corpus Christi/Nueces Bay Area WATER QUALITY ECOTOURISM HABITAT & LIVING RESOURCES A Joint Project of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program and the Texas General Land Office In conjunction with the Center for Coastal Studies, TAMU-CC Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program CCBNEP-15 July 1997 This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #CE-9963-01-2 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, nor do the contents of this document necessarily constitute the views or policy of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Management Conference or its members. The information presented is intended to provide background information, including the professional opinion of the authors, for the Management Conference deliberations while drafting official policy in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The mention of trade names or commercial products does not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. POTENTIAL SITES FOR WETLAND RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND CREATION: CORPUS CHRISTI/NUECES BAY AREA Elizabeth H. Smith Co-Principal Investigator Center for Coastal Studies Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Thomas R. Calnan Co-Principal Investigator Coastal Division Texas
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact Projections
    Economic Impact Projections On proposed Grand Canal and Entertainment District Development on North Beach, Corpus Christi, Texas (“Project”) October 18, 2019 Prepared for: North Beach Preservation Society 555 Carancahua St., STE 550 Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Prepared by: Eilmann Consulting 4308 Rosser Square Dallas, TX 75244 1 | P a g e Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 5 Report Overview ............................................................................................. 8 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology Overview ..................................................................................................................... 11 Data Sources ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Direct Project Revenues & Expenditures......................................................... 15 Direct Project Revenues ..................................................................................................................... 15 Direct Revenues & Sales Summary ..................................................................................................... 15 Direct Construction Expenditures ...................................................................................................... 16 Direct Construction Expenditures
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2017 Emissions Inventory Report
    Port of Corpus Christi Authority 2017 Air Emissions Inventory Prepared for: September 2019 Prepared by: Port of Corpus Christi Authority 2017 Air Emissions Inventory TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Reason for Study .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Study ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Pollutants ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2.2 Temporal Extent ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Emission Source Categories .................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Geographical Domain ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Marine-side Geographical Domain ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Land-side Geographical Domain .......................................................................................................... 5 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Conservation Impact Report
    2009 Conservation Impact Report Introduction AZA-accredited zoos and aquariums serve as conservation centers that are concerned about ecosystem health, take responsibility for species survival, contribute to research, conservation, and education, and provide society the opportunity to develop personal connections with the animals in their care. Whether breeding and re-introducing endangered species, rescuing and rehabilitating sick and injured animals, maintaining far-reaching educational and outreach programs or supporting and conducting in-situ and ex-situ research and field conservation projects, zoos and aquariums play a vital role in maintaining our planet’s diverse wildlife and natural habitats while engaging the public to appreciate and participate in conservation. In 2009, 127 of AZA’s 238 accredited institutions and certified-related facilities contributed data for the 2009 Conservation Impact Report. A summary of the 1,762 conservation efforts these institutions participated in within ~60 countries is provided. In addition, a list of individual projects is broken out by state and zoological institution. This report was compiled by Shelly Grow (AZA Conservation Biologist) as well as Jamie Shockley and Katherine Zdilla (AZA Volunteer Interns). This report, along with those from previous years, is available on the AZA Web site at: http://www.aza.org/annual-report-on-conservation-and-science/. 2009 AZA Conservation Projects Grevy's Zebra Trust ARGENTINA National/International Conservation Support CANADA Temaiken Foundation Health
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential Impacts of the Panama Canal Expansion on Texas Ports Final Report
    The Potential Impacts of the Panama Canal Expansion on Texas Ports Final report PRC 17-78 The Potential Impacts of the Panama Canal Expansion on Texas Ports Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 17-78 January 2018 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Sarah Overmyer Copies of this publication have been deposited with the Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository Law, Texas Government Code §441.101-106. 2 Potential Impacts of Panama Canal Expansion on Texas Ports The 2016 expansion of the Panama Canal allows significantly larger cargo ships traveling from East Asia to access the U.S. Gulf and East Coasts via an all-water route, which is typically the least costly way to transport goods. This study sought to examine the potential impacts specifically on Texas sea ports. • The Port of Houston has predicted an increase in traffic in the long-term due to the Panama Canal expansion, expecting that the newly deepened Port will attract heavier or larger vessels to unload there. Other Gulf Coast ports also expect an increase. Expanded channels have been approved for the Ports of Brownsville, Corpus Christi, Freeport, and the Sabine-Neches Waterway, but no funding has been appropriated to these projects. • To date, the greatest impact of the expansion appears to be associated with tankers, especially for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Some 86 percent of the world’s LNG fleet can now pass through the Canal, compared to only 8 percent before the expansion. • Prior to the expansion, about 40 ships passed through the Canal each day.
    [Show full text]
  • Lone Star State Ports Setting Records, Enhancing Diverse Cargo Infrastructure
    Lone Star State ports setting records, enhancing diverse cargo infrastructure by Paul Scott Abbott 5 hours ago | Published in Issue 704 Page 1: Port Houston Page 2: Port of Port Arthur Page 3: Port of Beaumont Page 4: Port of Galveston Page 5: Port Freeport Page 6: Calhoun Port Authority Page 7: Port of Corpus Christi Page 8: Port of Brownsville With record cargo volumes seemingly becoming commonplace, ports throughout Texas are assertively forging ahead with a multitude of infrastructure enhancements to handle even more activity in the future. Recent developments include not only expansions of on-terminal capabilities but also, in a number of cases, the advancement of deeper, wider ship channels. Beginning with Port Houston, the longtime No. 1 U.S. foreign tonnage port, then heading east to the Sabine-Neches Waterway facilities of Port Arthur and Beaumont before taking a southwestward jaunt along the Texas Gulf Coast to just north of the Mexico border, here’s the latest going on at key ports of the Lone Star State: Port Houston Marking a fourth consecutive year of double-digit growth in containerized cargo volume, Port Houston handled a record 2,987,291 twenty-foot-equivalent units in 2019 while adding three new container services and two general cargo liner services. Loaded container exports, buoyed by shipments of polyethylene resins, led the way with a 17 percent year-over-year increase. Overall tonnage moving through Port Houston public facilities also reached an all-time high last year, rising 5 percent over the preceding 12-month period, to 37.8 million tons.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Chief the City of Corpus Christi, Texas This Position Will Remain Posted Until Filled
    POLICE CHIEF THE CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS THIS POSITION WILL REMAIN POSTED UNTIL FILLED PUBLIC SECTOR EXECUTIVE RECRUITMENT THE COMMUNITY The City of Corpus Christi is a beautiful costal city in the South Texas region, located 130 miles southeast of San Antonio. Known as the “Sparkling City by the Sea,” Corpus Christi is the Nueces County Seat, and one of the largest seaports in the United States. Spanish explorer Alonzo Alvarez de Pineda discovered the area in 1519 and settlers incorporated the city in 1852. Over the years, Corpus Christi has grown into a regional hub for marketing, processing, packaging, and distribution of agricultural commodities. Additionally, the City’s economy is diverse with a blend of various business and industries, including petrochemical, tourism, health care, retail, education, shipping, agriculture, and the military. Today, the City of Corpus Christi is the eighth largest city in Texas and the 61st largest city in the US, with a population of 327,406 based on the City’s 2020 estimate. Area attractions include the Padre Island National Seashore, Texas State Aquarium, and the USS Lexington, a retired WWII aircraft carrier, the American Bank Center, and an entertainment complex that offers an auditorium, convention center, and arena. Additionally, Corpus Christi serves as the home of Texas A&M University Islander Basketball, IceRays Hockey and AF2 Sharks football. Corpus Christi is also home to the Corpus Christi Hooks, a minor league baseball team of the Texas League, the Double-A affiliate of the Houston Astros baseball team. Citizens have access to a wide variety of arts and culture facilities and world class museums.
    [Show full text]
  • General-Brochure-Web.Pdf
    PAPALOTE ST. PAUL GENERAL INFORMATION Port Corpus Christi is the fifth largest port in the United States in total tonnage. The Port provides a straight, 45’ deep channel (approved and authorized for 52 ft.) and quick access to the Gulf of Mexico and the entire United States inland waterway system. The Port delivers outstanding access to overland transportation, with on-site and direct connections to three Class-I railroads, BNSF, KCS and UP, and direct, vessel-to-rail discharge capabilities. InnerInner HarborHarbor LA QUINTA TRADE GATEWAY The La Quinta Trade Gateway Terminal is an 1,100 acre greenfield project by Port Corpus Christi. When fully developed, this facility will provide a state-of-the-art multipurpose dock and container facility. The project consists of the Federal extension of the 45’ deep La Quinta Ship Channel, a 3800’, three berth ship dock with nine ship-to-shore cranes, 180 acres of container/cargo storage, an intermodal rail yard, and over 400 acres for on-site distribution & warehouse centers. The facility will be served by on-site Class I railroads. REFUGIO LaLa QuintaQuinta ChannelChannel COUNTY A ran sas R iver NORTHSIDE TERMINAL Project Cargo, RO/RO, Breakbulk and General Transfer Capabilities • Dockside rail or truck transfer capability Cargo can be loaded, unloaded and transferred • 122,000 square feet of shipside covered storage directly between trucks, rail and vessels at Dock • RO/RO ramp handles bow or stern ramp vessels 9. Shipside tracks on Dock 9 allow direct transfers between vessels and railcars and a 48-foot wide Rail and Highway Access canopy over double rail tracks allows loading of The Northside docks have uncongested, direct weather-sensitive cargoes.
    [Show full text]