Report on the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan 2019 to 2031
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Report on the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan 2019 to 2031 An Examination undertaken for Dorset Council with the support of the Puddletown Area Parish Council on the May 2020 submission version of the Plan. Independent Examiner: Andrew Mead BSc (Hons) MRTPI MIQ Date of Report: 3 December 2020 Intelligent Plans and Examinations (IPE) Ltd, 3 Princes Street, Bath BA1 1HL Registered in England and Wales. Company Reg. No. 10100118. VAT Reg. No. 237 7641 84 1 Contents Page Main Findings - Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction and Background 3 • Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan 2019 to 2031 3 • The Independent Examiner 4 • The Scope of the Examination 4 • The Basic Conditions 5 2. Approach to the Examination 5 • Planning Policy Context 5 • Submitted Documents 6 • Site Visit 7 • Written Representations with or without Public 7 Hearing • Modifications 7 3. Procedural Compliance and Human Rights 7 • Qualifying Body and Neighbourhood Plan Area 7 • Plan Period 8 • Neighbourhood Plan Preparation and Consultation 8 • Development and Use of Land 9 • Excluded Development 9 • Human Rights 9 4. Compliance with the Basic Conditions 9 • EU Obligations 9 • Main Issues 11 • Vision and Objectives 11 • Local Landscape Character and the Built 11 Environment • The Environment 14 • Housing 15 • Community Facilities and other infrastructure 19 • Transport and Traffic 19 • Overview 19 5. Conclusions 20 • Summary 20 • The Referendum and its Area 20 • Concluding Comments 20 Appendix: Modifications 21 Intelligent Plans and Examinations (IPE) Ltd, 3 Princes Street, Bath BA1 1HL Registered in England and Wales. Company Reg. No. 10100118. VAT Reg. No. 237 7641 84 2 Main Findings - Executive Summary From my examination of the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan (PNP/the Plan) and its supporting documentation including the representations made, I have concluded that subject to the policy modifications set out in this report, the Plan meets the Basic Conditions. I have also concluded that: - The Plan has been prepared and submitted for examination by a qualifying body – the Puddletown Area Parish Council; - The Plan has been prepared for an area properly designated – the Parish of Puddletown, as shown on Map 1 on page 1 of the submitted Plan; - The Plan specifies the period during which it is to take effect: 2019 to 2031; and - The policies relate to the development and use of land for a designated neighbourhood area. I recommend that the Plan, once modified, proceeds to referendum on the basis that it has met all the relevant legal requirements. I have considered whether the referendum area should extend beyond the designated area to which the Plan relates and have concluded that it should not. 1. Introduction and Background Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan 2019 to 2031 1.1 Puddletown Parish has a resident population of nearly 1,500.1 The village lies close to the junction of the A35 linking Dorchester, 8 km to the south west, with Bere Regis and the A354 which leads to Blandford Forum about 19 km to the north east. Poole lies about 34 km to the east along the A35. The village is located in gently undulating agricultural landscape, within the low-lying valley of the River Piddle. 1.2 Puddletown Parish is part of a wider group of parishes which comprise those of Puddletown, Athelhampton, Burleston and Tolpuddle and which are represented by the Puddletown Area Parish Council (PAPC). This Neighbourhood Plan is for the Parish of Puddletown and does not include the other parishes in the PAPC. 1.3 The decision to prepare a neighbourhood plan was taken by the PAPC in 2013. However, despite the formation of a steering group in 2015, progress on the preparation of the Plan was sporadic through intervening 1 The Office for National Statistics estimated the combined population of Puddletown and Athelhampton Parishes in 2017 as 1,492. Intelligent Plans and Examinations (IPE) Ltd, 3 Princes Street, Bath BA1 1HL Registered in England and Wales. Company Reg. No. 10100118. VAT Reg. No. 237 7641 84 3 years until 2019, when it accelerated culminating in the submission of the Plan to Dorset Council (DC) in May 2020. The Independent Examiner 1.4 As the Plan has now reached the examination stage, I have been appointed as the examiner of the PNP by DC, with the agreement of the PAPC. 1.5 I am a chartered town planner and former government Planning Inspector and have experience of examining neighbourhood plans. I am an independent examiner, and do not have an interest in any of the land that may be affected by the Plan. The Scope of the Examination 1.6 As the independent examiner, I am required to produce this report and recommend either: (a) that the neighbourhood plan is submitted to a referendum without changes; or (b) that modifications are made and that the modified neighbourhood plan is submitted to a referendum; or (c) that the neighbourhood plan does not proceed to a referendum on the basis that it does not meet the necessary legal requirements. 1.7 The scope of the examination is set out in Paragraph 8(1) of Schedule 4B to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) (‘the 1990 Act’). The examiner must consider: • Whether the Plan meets the Basic Conditions; • Whether the Plan complies with provisions under s.38A and s.38B of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) (‘the 2004 Act’). These are: - it has been prepared and submitted for examination by a qualifying body, for an area that has been properly designated by the local planning authority; - it sets out policies in relation to the development and use of land; - it specifies the period during which it has effect; - it does not include provisions and policies for ‘excluded development’; Intelligent Plans and Examinations (IPE) Ltd, 3 Princes Street, Bath BA1 1HL Registered in England and Wales. Company Reg. No. 10100118. VAT Reg. No. 237 7641 84 4 - it is the only neighbourhood plan for the area and does not relate to land outside the designated neighbourhood area; - whether the referendum boundary should be extended beyond the designated area, should the Plan proceed to referendum; and • Such matters as prescribed in the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) (‘the 2012 Regulations’). 1.8 I have considered only matters that fall within Paragraph 8(1) of Schedule 4B to the 1990 Act, with one exception. That is the requirement that the Plan is compatible with the Human Rights Convention. The Basic Conditions 1.9 The ‘Basic Conditions’ are set out in Paragraph 8(2) of Schedule 4B to the 1990 Act. In order to meet the Basic Conditions, the neighbourhood plan must: - Have regard to national policies and advice contained in guidance issued by the Secretary of State; - Contribute to the achievement of sustainable development; - Be in general conformity with the strategic policies of the development plan for the area; - Be compatible with and not breach European Union (EU) obligations; and - Meet prescribed conditions and comply with prescribed matters. 1.10 Regulation 32 of the 2012 Regulations prescribes a further Basic Condition for a neighbourhood plan. This requires that the making of the Plan does not breach the requirement of Chapter 8 Part 6 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (‘the 2017 Regulations’).2 2. Approach to the Examination Planning Policy Context 2.1 The current Development Plan for Puddletown Parish, excluding policies relating to minerals and waste development, is the West Dorset, Weymouth and Portland Local Plan 2015 (WDWPLP). Until April 2019, West Dorset District Council and Weymouth and Portland Borough Council 2 This revised Basic Condition came into force on 28 December 2018 through the Conservation of Habitats and Species and Planning (Various Amendments) (England and Wales) Regulations 2018. Intelligent Plans and Examinations (IPE) Ltd, 3 Princes Street, Bath BA1 1HL Registered in England and Wales. Company Reg. No. 10100118. VAT Reg. No. 237 7641 84 5 were working on a Local Plan Review. However, on 1 April 2019, Dorset Council became a unitary authority which absorbed West Dorset District and Weymouth and Portland Borough Councils and the evidence which was gathered for the Local Plan Review is now being used to produce the Dorset Council Local Plan (DCLP) for the whole of the new administrative area. 2.2 The DCLP is at a very early stage in its preparation and no emergent policies have been published. Nevertheless, Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) states that it is important to minimise any conflicts between policies in the neighbourhood plan and those in the emerging local plan, including housing supply policies. The PPG advises that the reasoning and evidence informing emerging local plans can be relevant to neighbourhood plans. Where a neighbourhood plan is brought forward before an up-to-date local plan is in place, the local planning authority and qualifying body should discuss and aim to agree the relationship between their emerging policies and the adopted development plan.3 2.3 The planning policy for England is set out principally in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). PPG offers guidance on how this policy should be implemented. A revised NPPF was published on 19 February 2019 and all references in this report are to the February 2019 NPPF and its accompanying PPG.4 Submitted Documents 2.4 I have considered all policy, guidance and other reference documents I consider relevant to the examination, including those submitted which includes: • the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan 2019 – 2031; • the map on page 1 of the