The Rusts of Puerto Rico. Luis A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Rusts of Puerto Rico. Luis A Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1962 The Rusts of Puerto Rico. Luis A. Roure Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Roure, Luis A., "The Rusts of Puerto Rico." (1962). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 755. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/755 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 62-6323 microfilmed exactly as received ROURE, Luis A., 1923- THE RUSTS OF PUERTO RICO. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1962 Botany University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE RUSTS OF PUERTO RICO A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany and Plant Pathology by Luis A. Roure B .S ., University of Puerto Rico, 1948 M .S., Louisiana State University, 1951 June, 1962 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The writer wishes to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. Bernard Lowy, under whose direction these studies were conducted, for his assistance and encouragement during the course of the investigations. Thanks and appreciation are also extended to Dr. S. J. P. Chilton for his encouragement. The writer is also grateful to the University of Puerto Rico for sending him to undertake graduate work in the Louisiana State University. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................. ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS................................................. iv ABSTRACT..................................................................................... xv REVIEW OF LITERATURE.......................... 1 A. Previous work on Puerto Rican rusts and their economic importance . ................................ 1 B. Phytogeographical n o t e s ......................................... 24 C. Soil types of Puerto Rico ......................................... 31 D. Elevations on the island . .............................. 39 E. Relationship of rusts to other Basidiomycetes . .................................................. 41 F. Principal ideas on phylogeny ................................ 50 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES EXAMINED................................... 65 CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWINGS OF SPECIES AND DRAWINGS OF M A PS................................... 154 HOST INDEX.............................................. 197 DEFINITION OF TERMS . 237 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................ 239 VITA.......................................................... 244 iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS A. DRAWINGS OF SPORES PLATE Page I. Fig, 1. Anqiopsora phakopsoroides (Arth. & Mains) Mains on Olyra latifolia L ., tellospores ........................ 154 Figs. 2, 3, 4. Anqiopsora zea Mains on Zea mays L., urediospores .................... 154 II. Fig. 5. Coleosporium dominqense (Berk.) Arth. on Plumeria alba L ., urediospores ................. 155 Figs. 6, 7. Coleosporium dominqense (Berk.) Arth. on Plumeria alba L ., te lio s p o r e s .................................... 155 III. Fig. 8. Coleosporium dominqense (Berk.) Arth. on Plumeria kruqii Urban, urediospores .............................. 156 Figs. 9, 10. Coleosporium dominqense (Berk.) Arth. on Plumeria obtusa L. , urediospores .................. 156 Eig. 11. Coleosporium dominqense (Berk.) Arth. on Plumeria rubra L ., urediospores ................................ 156 IV. Figs. 12, 13, 14, 15. Coleosporium elephantopodis (Schw.) Thum. on Elephantopodis mollis H. B. K., urediospores ......................................................................... 157 V. Fig. 16. Coleosporium ipomoeae (Schw.) Bun:, on Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., urediospores ..................... 158 Fig. 17. Coleosporium ipomoeae (Schw.) Burr, on Ipomoea rubra (Vahl.) M illsp., urediospores ............... 158 Fig. 18. Coleosporium ipomoeae (Schw.) Burr, on Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Gris., urediospores. 158 VI. Fig. 19. Desmella superficialis (Speq.) Svd. on Adiantum cristatum L .. urediospores .............................. 159 iv PLATE Page VII. Fig. 20. Endophvllum circumscriptum (Schw.) Whetz. & Olive on Cissus sicvoides L ., teliospores ..................... 160 Fig. 21. Endophvllum decoloratum (Schw.) Whetz. & Olive on Clibadium erosum (Sw.) DC., teliospores . 160 Fig. 22. Endophvllum decoloratum (Schw.) Whetz. & Olive on Wedelia trilobata (L.) Hitchc., teliospores. ............................................................................. 160 VIII. Figs. 23, 24. Phakopsora jatrophicola (Arth.) Cummins on Tatropha curcas L ., urediospores ............... 161 Fig. 25. Phakopsora j atrophicola (Arth.) Cummins on Tatropha gossypifblia L .. urediospores ........................ 161 Fig. 26. Phakopsora iatrophicola (Arth.) Cummins on Tatropha gossypifolia L ., teliospores . .................. 161 IX. Fig. 27. Puccinia canaliculata (Schw.) Laqh. on Cyperus ferax Rich. u red io sp o re s.................................... 162 Figs. 28, 29. Puccinia cannae (Wint.) P. Henn. on Canna coccinea A it.. urediospores .............................. 162 X. Figs. 30, 31, 32. Puccinia cenchri Diet. & Holw. on Cenchrus echinatus L ., urediospores ........................... 163 XI. Fig. 33. Puccinia chrvsanthemi Roze on Chrysanthemum frutescens L., urediospores .................. 164 Fig. 34. Puccinia dichromenae (Arth.) Jacks, on Dichromena sp ., urediospores .............................. 164 Fig. 35. Puccinia dichromenae (Arth.) Jacks, on Dichromena ciliata Vahl., urediospores ........................... 164 Fig. 36. Puccinia dichromenae (Arth.) Jacks, on Dichromena radicans Schl. & Cham., urediospores. 164 v PIATE Page XII. Fig. 37. Puccinia heliconiae (Diet ) Arth. on Bihai borinquena Griggs, urediospores. ............ 165 Fig. 38. Puccinia heliconiae (Diet.) Arth. on Heliconia sp., teliospores .................................................. 165 XIII. Fig. 39. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt, on Abutilon umbellatum (L.) Sweet., teliospores ...... 166 Figs. 40, 41. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt. on Sida glomerata Cay., mesospores ................................ 166 Fig. 42. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt, on Sida hederaefolia Cay, / mesospores ................................. 166 XIV. Fig. 43. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt, on Sida humilis Cav., mesospores ......................................... 167 Figs. 44, 45. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt. on Sida procumbens Sw., mesospores .............................. 167 Fig. 46. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt, on Sida urens L ., mesospores .................................................. 167 XV. Fig. 47. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt, on Sida urens L ., teliospores. ............................................... 168 Fig. 48. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt, on Wissadula amplissima (L.) R. E. Fries, mesospores. 168 Fig. 49. Puccinia heterospora Berk. & Curt, on Wissadula periplocifolia (L.) Presl., mesospores. 168 Fig .5 0 . Puccinia hyptidis (Curt.) Tracy & Earle on Hyptis capitata Tacq.. urediosppres ........................... 168 XVI. Fig. 51. Puccinia lantanae Farl. on Lantana camara L ., teliospores ................................... 169 Fig .5 2 . Puccinia lantanae Farl. on Lantana camara L ., mesospores ........................................ 169 Fig. 53. Puccinia lantanae Farl. on Lantana involucrata L ., mesospores .................................................. 169 vi Page Fig. 54. Puccinia lantanae Farl. on Lantana involucrata L ., teliospores .......................................... 169 Fig. 55. Puccinia leonotidis (P. Henn.)Arth. on Leonotis nepetaefolia (L.) R. Br., urediospores ............ 170 Fig. 56. Puccinia leonotidis (P. Henn.) Arth. on Leonotis nepetaefolia (L.) R. Br., urediospores ............ 170 Fig. 57. Puccinia leptochloae A. & Fromme on Leptochloa filiformis (Lam.) Beauv., mesospores. 170 Fig. 58. Puccinia leptochloae A. & Fromme on Leptochloa filiformis (Lam.) Beauv., teliospores . 170 Fig. 59. Puccinia leptochloae A. & Fromme on Leptochloa filiformis (Lam.) Beauv., teliospores . 171 Fig. 60. Puccinia levis (Sacc. & Bizz.) Magn. on Manisuris sp .. urediospores ............................................... 171 Fig. 61. Puccinia levis (Sacc. & Bizz.) Magn. on Panicum fasciculatum Swartz . urediospores .................. 171 Fig. 62. Puccinia levis (Sacc. & Bizz.) Magn. on Panicum trichoides Sw., urediospores ........................... 171 Fig. 63. Puccinia levis (S. & B.) Magn. on Paspalum fimbriatum H. B. K., urediospores. ............... 172 Fig. 64. Puccinia levis (Sacc. & Bizz.) Magn. on Paspalum milleqrana Poir., urediospores .................. 172 Fig. 65. Puccinia levis (Sacc. & Bizz.) Magn. on Paspalum schreberianum. urediospores ........................ 172 Fig. 66. Puccinia levis (Sacc. & Bizz.) Magn. on Rytilix qranularis (L.) Skeels, urediospores ............ 172 Fig. 67. Puccinia levis (Sacc. & Bizz.) Magn. on Tricholaena repens (Willd.) Hitchc., urediospores. 173 Fig. 68. Puccinia melampodii Diet. & Holw. on Eleutherantherae ruderalis D iet., teliospores ............... 173 vii PIATE Page Fig. 69. Puccinia melampodii
Recommended publications
  • Monocyclic Components for Evaluating Disease Resistance to Cercospora Arachidicola and Cercosporidium Personatum in Peanut
    Monocyclic Components for Evaluating Disease Resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in Peanut by Limin Gong A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 6, 2016 Keywords: monocyclic components, disease resistance Copyright 2016 by Limin Gong Approved by Kira L. Bowen, Chair, Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Y. Chen, Associate Professor of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences John F. Murphy, Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology Jeffrey J. Coleman, Assisstant Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology ABSTRACT Cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an economically important crop that is produced in the United States and throughout the world. However, there are two major fungal pathogens of cultivated peanuts, and they each contribute to substantial yield losses of 50% or greater. The pathogens of these diseases are Cercospora arachidicola which causes early leaf spot (ELS), and Cercosporidium personatum which causes late leaf spot (LLS). While fungicide treatments are fairly effective for leaf spot management, disease resistance is still the best strategy. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare different genotypes for their disease resistance levels. The overall goal of this study was to determine resistance levels of different peanut genotypes to ELS and LLS. The peanut genotypes (Chit P7, C1001, Exp27-1516, Flavor Runner 458, PI 268868, and GA-12Y) used in this study include two genetically modified lines (Chit P7 and C1001) that over-expresses a chitinase gene. This overall goal was addressed with three specific objectives: 1) determine suitable conditions for pathogen culture and spore production in vitro; 2) determine suitable conditions for establishing infection in the greenhouse; 3) compare ELS and LLS disease reactions of young plants to those of older plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnosperms) of New York State
    QK 129 . C667 1992 Pinophyta (Gymnosperms) of New York State Edward A. Cope The L. H. Bailey Hortorium Cornell University Contributions to a Flora of New York State IX Richard S. Mitchell, Editor 1992 Bulletin No. 483 New York State Museum The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Albany, New York 12230 V A ThL U: ESTHER T. SVIERTZ LIBRARY THI-: ?‘HW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN THE LuESTHER T. MERTZ LIBRARY THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN Pinophyta (Gymnosperms) of New York State Edward A. Cope The L. H. Bailey Hortorium Cornell University Contributions to a Flora of New York State IX Richard S. Mitchell, Editor 1992 Bulletin No. 483 New York State Museum The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUC ATION DEPARTMENT Albany, New York 12230 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University Martin C. Barell, Chancellor, B.A., I.A., LL.B. Muttontown R. Carlos Carballada, Vice Chancellor, B.S. Rochester Willard A. Genrich, LL.B. Buffalo Emlyn I. Griffith. A.B.. J.D. Rome Jorge L. Batista, B.A.. J.D. Bronx Laura Bradley Chodos, B.A., M.A. Vischer Ferry Louise P. Matteoni, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. Bayside J. Edward Meyer, B.A., LL.B. Chappaqua FloydS. Linton, A.B., M.A., M.P.A. Miller Place Mimi Levin Lif.ber, B.A., M.A. Manhattan Shirley C. Brown, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. Albany Norma Gluck, B.A., M.S.W. Manhattan Adelaide L. Sanford, B.A., M.A., P.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Pheromone of Conophthorus Ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in a Coastal Stand of Western White Pine (Pinaceae)
    SEX PHEROMONE OF CONOPHTHORUS PONDEROSAE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) IN A COASTAL STAND OF WESTERN WHITE PINE (PINACEAE) \ ._ DANIEL R MILLER’ j I,’ . D.R. Miller Consulting Services, 1201-13353 108th Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia, ’ Canada V3T ST5 HAROLD D PIERCE JR Department of Chemistry. Simon Fraser University. Burnaby. British Columbia. Canada V5A IS.6 PETER DE GROOT Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, P.O. Box 490. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7 NICOLE JEANS-WILLIAMS Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby. British Columbia. Canada V5A IS6 ROBB BENNEI-~ Tree Improvement Branch. British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 7380 Puckle Road. Saanichton, British Columbia. Canada V8M 1 W4 and JOHN H BORDEN Centre for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences. Simon Fraser University. Burnaby, British Columbia. Canada V5A IS6 The Canadian Entomologist 132: 243 - 245 (2000) An isolated stand of western white pine, Pinus monticola Dougl. ex D. Don, on Texada Island (49”4O’N, 124”1O’W), British Columbia, is extremely valuable as a seed-production area for progeny resistant to white pine blister rust, Cronartium ribicola J.C. Fisch. (Cronartiaceae). During the past 5 years, cone beetles, Conophthorus ponderosae Hopkins (= C. monticolae), have severely limited crops of western white pine seed from the stand. Standard management options for cone beetles in seed orchards are not possible on Texada Island. A control program in wild stands such as the one on Texada Island requires alternate tactics such as a semiochemical-based trapping program. Females of the related species, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) and Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins, produce (+)-pityol, (2R,5S)-2-( 1 -hydroxyl- 1 -methylethyl)-5-methyl-tetrahydrofuran, a sex pheromone that attracts males of both species (Birgersson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Rust on Solidago Canadensis, a New Host Record for Coleosporium Asterum from India
    Plant Pathology & Quarantine 6(1): 43–46 (2016) ISSN 2229-2217 www.ppqjournal.org Article PPQ Copyright © 2016 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/ppq/6/1/6 Occurrence of rust on Solidago canadensis, a new host record for Coleosporium asterum from India Thite SV, Hande PR and Kore BA* Department of Botany, Yashvantrao Chavan Institute of Science, Satara – 415 001, (M.S), India Thite SV, Hande PR, Kore BA 2016 – Occurrence of rust on Solidago canadensis, a new host record for Coleosporium asterum from India. Plant Pathology & Quarantine 6(1), 43–46, Doi 10.5943/ppq/6/1/6 Abstract In September 2012, leaves of Solidago canadensis with typical symptoms of rust were collected in the Botanical Garden of Yashvantrao Chavan Institute of Science, Satara (MS, India). The rust was identified as Coleosporium asterum. This rust is recorded on S. canadensis in India for the first time. Key words – Asteraceae – Coleosporiaceae – Coleosporium asterum – Solidago canadensis. Introduction Solidago canadensis L. (Asteraceae) (cf. The Plant List, 2014) (Fig. 1A), commonly called Canadian goldenrod, is native to North America (Hegi 1979). It often occurs as a weed in abandoned fields and roadsides, grasslands, forest edges and human-influenced habitats in urban areas and settlements (Walck et al. 1999). It is also cultivated as an ornamental in botanical gardens and home gardens in various parts of the world. The plant is exotic to India and was introduced for its ornamental value. The inflorescence of the plant forms a broad pyramidal panicle with a central axis and recurving branches giving it a gorgeous look. Its golden yellow attractive inflorescence is largely used in bouquets.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertação Jaqueline Maria.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RECÔNCAVO DA BAHIA CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS, AMBIENTAIS E BIOLÓGICAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS CURSO DE MESTRADO DIVERSIDADE DE FERRUGENS (Pucciniales) NO NORDESTE BRASILEIRO JAQUELINE MARIA OLIVEIRA DO NASCIMENTO CRUZ DAS ALMAS-BAHIA FEVEREIRO – 2013 DIVERSIDADE DE FERRUGENS (Pucciniales) NO NORDESTE BRASILEIRO JAQUELINE MARIA OLIVEIRA DO NASCIMENTO Engenheira Agrônoma Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, 2010 Dissertação submetida ao Colegiado do Curso do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Agrárias da Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, como requisito parcial para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Ciências Agrárias, Área de Concentração Fitotecnia. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Jorge Teodoro de Souza Co-Orientador: Prof. Dr. Aníbal Alves de Carvalho Júnior UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RECÔNCAVO DA BAHIA MESTRADO EM CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS CRUZ DAS ALMAS - BAHIA - 2013 FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA N244 Nascimento, Jaqueline Maria Oliveira do. Diversidade de ferrugens (Pucciniales) no Noredeste Brasileiro / Jaqueline Maria Oliveira do Nascimento._ Cruz das Almas, BA, 2013. 81f.; il. Orientador: Jorge Teodoro de Souza. Ficha elaborada Dissertação pela Biblioteca (Mestrado) Universitária – Universidade de Cruz das Federal Almas -do UFRB. Recôncavo da Bahia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Ambientais e Biológicas. 1.Fitopatologia – Plantas. 2.Fungos – Doenças. 3.Diversidade biológica. I.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Ambientais e Biológicas. II.Título. CDD: 632.3 Ficha elaborada pela Biblioteca Universitária de Cruz das Almas - UFRB. Aos meus pais, minha irmã e ao meu namorado pelo apoio, companheirismo e dedicação que sempre tens comigo. Dedico Agradecimentos Em primeiro lugar a Deus, pelas oportunidades que me tem concedido. Aos meus pais Jair e Jandira pelo amor, apoio, carinho e exemplos de perseverança, humildade e honestidade.
    [Show full text]
  • First Checklist of Rust Fungi in the Genus Puccinia from Himachal Pradesh, India
    Plant Pathology & Quarantine 6(2): 106–120 (2016) ISSN 2229-2217 www.ppqjournal.org Article PPQ Copyright © 2016 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/ppq/6/2/1 First checklist of rust fungi in the genus Puccinia from Himachal Pradesh, India Gautam AK1* and Avasthi S2 1 Faculty of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Mandi-175028, India 2 Department of Botany, Abhilashi Institute of Life Sciences, Mandi- 175008, India Gautam AK, Avasthi S 2016 – First checklist of rust fungi in the genus Puccinia from Himachal Pradesh, India. Plant Pathology & Quarantine 6(2), 106–120, Doi 10.5943/ppq/6/2/1 Abstract A checklist of rust fungi belonging to the genus Puccinia was prepared for Himachal Pradesh, India. All Puccinia species published until 2014 are included in this list. A total of 80 species have been reported on 91 plant species belonging to 33 families. The family Poaceae supports the highest number of species (26 species) followed by Ranunculaceae (8), Asteraceae (7), Apiaceae and Polygonaceae (6 each), Rubiaceae and Cyperaceae (3 each), Acanthaceae, Berberidaceae, Lamiaceae and Saxifragaceae (2 each). The other host plant families are associated with a single species of Puccinia. This study provides the first checklist of Puccinia from Himachal Pradesh. Key words – checklist – Himachal Pradesh – Puccinia spp. – rust fungi Introduction Himachal Pradesh is a hilly state situated in the heart of Himalaya in the northern part of India. The state extends between 30° 22’ 40” – 33° 12’ 20” north latitudes and 75° 44’ 55” – 79° 04’ 20” east longitudes. The total area of the state is 55,670 km2, covered with very high mountains to plain grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • (US) 38E.85. a 38E SEE", A
    USOO957398OB2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,573,980 B2 Thompson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 21, 2017 (54) FUSION PROTEINS AND METHODS FOR 7.919,678 B2 4/2011 Mironov STIMULATING PLANT GROWTH, 88: R: g: Ei. al. 1 PROTECTING PLANTS FROM PATHOGENS, 3:42: ... g3 is et al. A61K 39.00 AND MMOBILIZING BACILLUS SPORES 2003/0228679 A1 12.2003 Smith et al." ON PLANT ROOTS 2004/OO77090 A1 4/2004 Short 2010/0205690 A1 8/2010 Blä sing et al. (71) Applicant: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2010/0233.124 Al 9, 2010 Stewart et al. (US) 38E.85. A 38E SEE",teWart et aal. (72) Inventors: Brian Thompson, Columbia, MO (US); 5,3542011/0321197 AllA. '55.12/2011 SE",Schön et al.i. Katie Thompson, Columbia, MO (US) 2012fO259101 A1 10, 2012 Tan et al. 2012fO266327 A1 10, 2012 Sanz Molinero et al. (73) Assignee: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2014/0259225 A1 9, 2014 Frank et al. US (US) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this CA 2146822 A1 10, 1995 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 EP O 792 363 B1 12/2003 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. EP 1590466 B1 9, 2010 EP 2069504 B1 6, 2015 (21) Appl. No.: 14/213,525 WO O2/OO232 A2 1/2002 WO O306684.6 A1 8, 2003 1-1. WO 2005/028654 A1 3/2005 (22) Filed: Mar. 14, 2014 WO 2006/O12366 A2 2/2006 O O WO 2007/078127 A1 7/2007 (65) Prior Publication Data WO 2007/086898 A2 8, 2007 WO 2009037329 A2 3, 2009 US 2014/0274707 A1 Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Survey for Biocontrol Agents of Ipomoea Carnea from Brazil
    Fungal survey for biocontrol agents of Ipomoea carnea from Brazil D.J. Soares and R.W. Barreto Summary Ipomoea carnea Jacq., also known as morning glory, is native of tropical America, and its purported centre of origin is the Paraguay Basin. This plant is feared by ranchers because of its well-documented toxicity to cattle. Because of its showy flowers, it became a popular ornamental in Brazil and was introduced into others countries, becoming an aggressive wetland ecosystem invader. Little is known about its mycobiota in Brazil which may include fungal pathogens that could be used in classical bio- control programmes. Coleosporium ipomoeae (Schwein.) Burril and Puccinia puta H.S. Jacks. and Holw. ex F. Kern, Thurst. and Whetzel are the only fungi recorded in the literature attacking this plant in Brazil. An intensive search for specialized, coevolved fungal pathogens of I. carnea was initiated in 2003 in Brazil. Twenty-one fungal species were collected. Among these were the two previously known rusts, C. ipomoeae and P. puta, and Aecidium sp., Albugo sp., an unidentified ascomycete, Mycosphaerella sp., five coelomycetes Colletotrichum( sp., Phoma sp. Phomopsis sp., and two Phyl- losticta spp.) and ten hyphomycetes (Alternaria sp., Cercospora sp., Cladosporium sp., Curvularia sp., Dactylaria-like, Fusarium-like, Nigrospora sp. Passalora sp. and two Pseudocercospora spp.). Observations of the damage caused by such fungal diseases in the field indicate that the fungi with the best potential as biological agents are C. ipomoeae, P. puta, Albugo sp., the Phyllostica sp. that colonizes stems, and Phomopsis sp. Keywords: aquatic weeds, biological control, coevolved pathogens, Ipomoea fistulosa, Ipomoea carnea subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • ISB: Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants
    Longleaf Pine Preserve Plant List Acanthaceae Asteraceae Wild Petunia Ruellia caroliniensis White Aster Aster sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Adoxaceae Begger-ticks Bidens mitis Walter's Viburnum Viburnum obovatum Deer Tongue Carphephorus paniculatus Pineland Daisy Chaptalia tomentosa Alismataceae Goldenaster Chrysopsis gossypina Duck Potato Sagittaria latifolia Cow Thistle Cirsium horridulum Tickseed Coreopsis leavenworthii Altingiaceae Elephant's foot Elephantopus elatus Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Oakleaf Fleabane Erigeron foliosus var. foliosus Fleabane Erigeron sp. Amaryllidaceae Prairie Fleabane Erigeron strigosus Simpson's rain lily Zephyranthes simpsonii Fleabane Erigeron vernus Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Anacardiaceae Dog Fennel Eupatorium compositifolium Winged Sumac Rhus copallinum Dog Fennel Eupatorium spp. Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans Slender Flattop Goldenrod Euthamia caroliniana Flat-topped goldenrod Euthamia minor Annonaceae Cudweed Gamochaeta antillana Flag Pawpaw Asimina obovata Sneezeweed Helenium pinnatifidum Dwarf Pawpaw Asimina pygmea Blazing Star Liatris sp. Pawpaw Asimina reticulata Roserush Lygodesmia aphylla Rugel's pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii Hempweed Mikania cordifolia White Topped Aster Oclemena reticulata Apiaceae Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Button Rattlesnake Master Eryngium yuccifolium Rosy Camphorweed Pluchea rosea Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Pluchea Pluchea spp. Mock Bishopweed Ptilimnium capillaceum Rabbit Tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum
    [Show full text]
  • Oxalis Violacea L. Violet Wood-Sorrel
    New England Plant Conservation Program Oxalis violacea L. Violet Wood-Sorrel Conservation and Research Plan for New England Prepared by: Thomas Mione Professor Central Connecticut State University For: New England Wild Flower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508/877-7630 e-mail: [email protected] • website: www.newfs.org Approved, Regional Advisory Council, December 2002 1 SUMMARY Violet Wood-Sorrel (Oxalis violacea L., Oxalidaceae) is a low-growing herbaceous, self-incompatible perennial that produces violet flowers in May, June and again in September. Reproduction is both sexual (with pollination mostly by bees), and asexual (by way of runners). The species is widely distributed in the United States but is rare in New England. Oxalis violacea is an obligate outcrosser: the species is distylous, meaning that there are two flower morphs (pin and thrum), with a given plant producing one morph, not both. Pin flowers are more common than thrum flowers. In New England, the habitat varies from dry to moist, and for populations to remain vigorous forest canopies must remain partially open. Succession, the growth of plants leading to shading, is a factor contributing to decline of O. violacea in New England, as are invasive species and habitat fragmentation. Fire benefits this species, in part by removing competitors. Human consumption of the leaves has been reported. Oxalis violacea has a Global Status Rank of G5, indicating that it is demonstrably widespread, abundant and secure. In Massachusetts, it is ranked as Threatened; five occurrences are current (in four towns among three counties) and 10 are historic. In Connecticut, it is listed as a species of Special Concern; 10 occurrences are current (in ten towns among six counties) and 19 are historic.
    [Show full text]
  • 9B Taxonomy to Genus
    Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation and Identification of Bioactive Compounds from Mesosphaerum Suaveolens L
    Vol.1/Issue1/Sept-Oct 2019 IJPO2 ISSN: Awaited Isolation and Identification of Bioactive Compounds from Mesosphaerum suaveolens L. (Kuntze) Aerial parts Mr. Nilesh V. Kadam*1, Mr. Nilesh Bhor2, 1Mylan Laboratories Ltd. Malegaon MIDC, Sinnar, Nashik, Maharashtra 422113 2Department of Pharmaceutics, R.C. Patel College of Pharmacy, Shirpur, Dhule, Maharashtra, India. Abstract Mesosphaerum suaveolens L. (Kuntze) is a perennial, erect, annual and aromatic herb that may grow up to height of 2m. Mesosphaerum suvaveolens methanolic extract fractionization was carried out in chloroform. From chloroform fraction triterpenoid was isolated by column chromatography. Triterpenoid identification did via chemical test, physical properties, TLC pattern. Then, the confirmation of chemical constituents was carried out by instrumental techniques as; UV, IR, MS and NMR. The tetracyclic triterpenoid stigmasterol structure interpreted at lastly. The ethanobotanical survey claim the valuable plant used for treating inflammation and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), No doubt, the further investigation must be needed for determining different pharmacological activity and medicinal use of Mesosphaerum suaveolens. But, at this level the present study claim that the stated activity is because of stigmasterol, because in inflammation and RA the steroids and triterpenoid play a vital role. Keywords Mesosphaerum suaveolens, Fractionisation, Isolation, Triterpenoid, * For Correspondence- Mr. Nilesh V. Kadam; Contact: +91 7875073094; Email: [email protected] Introduction
    [Show full text]