DOCSLIB.ORG

“Is the U.S. Back?” Date: April 28(Tue) – April 29(Wed), 2015 Place: the Grand Hyatt Seoul

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Is the U.S. Back?” Date: April 28(Tue) – April 29(Wed), 2015 Place: the Grand Hyatt Seoul Asan Plenum 2015 “Is the U.S. Back?” Date: April 28(Tue) – April 29(Wed), 2015 Place: The Grand Hyatt Seoul Updated as of April 13, 2015 Day 1: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 Time Panel Title Panelist Affiliation 08:30-09:30 Registration Opening Welcoming Remarks Hahm Chaibong The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Ceremony Grand Opening Remarks Chung Mong Joon The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Ballroom II 09:30-10:10 Keynote Address Karen E. House Pepperdine University 10:10-10:15 Break M) Hahm Chaibong The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Plenary Joshua C. Ramo Kissinger Associates Is the U.S. Back? Session I James Steinberg Syracuse University Grand Ballroom II (English/Korean) Togo Kazuhiko Kyoto Sangyo University 10:15-11:30 China Institute for Innovation and Wu Jianmin Development Strategy 11:30-12:30 Lunch M) James Kim The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Philip Andrews-Speed National University of Singapore Geopolitics of Shale Grand Ballroom II Chen Weidong China National Offshore Oil Corporation (English/Korean) Edward Chow Center for Strategic and Int’l Studies Mikkal Herberg National Bureau of Asian Research M) Bark Taeho Seoul National University Kwon Goohoon Goldman Sachs Session 1 Geopolitics of Finance Benn Steil Council on Foreign Relations Regency Room Taniguchi Tomohiko 12:30-13:45 Keio University (TBC) M) Choi Kang The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Bruce Bennett RAND Corporation Revolution in Military U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs Michael Schiffer Relations Grand Ballroom III Xu Weidi National Defense University, PLA Yamaguchi Noboru International University of Japan 13:45-14:00 Break M) Lee Chung Min Yonsei University Plenary Edwin Feulner The Heritage Foundation Limits of U.S. Power? Session II Grand Ballroom II Han Sung Joo Korea University (English/Korean) 14:00-15:15 Guy Sorman Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Yao Yunzhu People’s Liberation Army 15:15-15:30 Break M) Nisid Hajari Bloomberg View Efraim Inbar Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Terrorism King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Joseph Kéchichian Grand Ballroom II Studies (English/Korean) Ellen Laipson Stimson Center Park Hyondo Myongji University M) David Sanger The New York Times Session 2 Van Jackson Center for a New American Security Cyberwar Park Nohyoung Korea University 15:30-16:45 Regency Room Ren Lin China Academy of Social Science Nils Melzer (TBC) Geneva Centre for Security Policy M) James Acton Carnegie Endowment for Int’l Peace Sven Jurschewsky Foreign Service Officer(ret.), Canada Nonproliferation Shin Chang Hoon The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Grand Ballroom III Richard Weitz Hudson Institute Yang Xiyu China Institute of International Studies 16:45-17:00 Break M) Philip Stephens Financial Times Chung Jae-Ho Seoul National University Plenary G2 or G1? Session III U.S.-China Relations Jia Qingguo Peking University Grand Ballroom II Eric Li Chengwei Capital 17:00-18:15 (English/Korean) Douglas H. Paal Carnegie Endowment for Int’l Peace Evans Revere Albright Stonebridge Group Day 2: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 Time Panel Title Panelist Affiliation 08:00-09:30 Registration Special Keynote Address HRH Prince Turki Al King Faisal Center for Research and Session Grand Ballroom II Faisal Bin Abdulaziz Islamic Studies 09:30-10:30 (English/Korean) 10:30-10:45 Break M) Choi Kang The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Reordering Eom Gu Ho Hanyang University U.S.-Russia Relations Svitlana Kobzar RAND Europe Grand Ballroom II The Asan Forum (English/Korean) Gil Rozman National Research University Higher Dmitry Suslov School of Economics, Russia M) Jang Ji-Hyang The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Salam Fayyad Future for Palestine, Fmr. Prime Minister Reordering the Session 3 Karen E. House Pepperdine University Middle East Centre for Economic and Foreign Policy 10:45 – 12:00 Regency Room Sinan Ü lgen Studies, EDAM Kwon Hee-seog Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ROK M) Simon Long The Economist Eric John Boeing Korea Reordering Kikuchi Tsutomu Aoyama Gakuin University East Asia Grand BallroomⅢ Charles Morrison East-West Center Sohn Yul Yonsei University Brandon Taylor (TBC) Australian National University Lunch and Book Launch: The Battle of Bretton Woods by Dr. Benn Steil 12:00 – 13:30 Moderated by Choi Byung-il, Ewha Womans University M) Martin Fackler The New York Times Never Been Worse? Alexis Dudden University of Connecticut Korea-Japan Relations Nishino Junya Keio University Grand Ballroom II (English/Korean) Park Cheol Hee Seoul National University Scott Snyder Council on Foreign Relations M) Jane Perlez The New York Times Chen Ping Global Times Session 4 Could Be Worse? China-Japan Relations Bonnie Glaser Center for Strategic and Int’l Studies 13:30-14:45 Regency Room Kato Yoichi The Asahi Shimbun Kim Heung-Kyu Ajou University M) Anna Fifield The Washington Post Never Been Better? Van Jackson Center for a New American Security Korea-U.S. Relations Kim Sunghan Korea University Ⅲ Grand Ballroom Sakata Yasuyo Kanda University of Int’l Studies Yang Xiyu China Institute of International Studies 14:45-15:00 Break M) David Sanger The New York Times Chun Yungwoo The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Plenary Korean Peninsula: Session IV The End Game? Sven Jurschewsky Foreign Service Officer(ret.), Canada Grand Ballroom II Sydney Seiler U.S. Department of State 15:00-16:15 (English/Korean) Yamaguchi Noboru International University of Japan Zhang Tuosheng China Foundation for Int’l Strategic Studies 16:15-16:30 Closing Remarks Observers: 1) Jonathan Chow, University of Macau 2) Li Tingting, Peking University 3) Liu Qun, People’s Liberation Army 4) Troy Stangarone, Korea Economic Institute .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World
    DEEP STATE DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. 2 by William F. Jasper The nationalist vs. globalist conflict is not merely an he whole world has gone insane ideological struggle between shadowy, unidentifiable and the lunatics are in charge of T the asylum. At least it looks that forces; it is a struggle with organized globalists who have way to any rational person surveying the very real, identifiable, powerful organizations and networks escalating revolutions that have engulfed the planet in the year 2020. The revolu- operating incessantly to undermine and subvert our tions to which we refer are the COVID- constitutional Republic and our Christian-style civilization. 19 revolution and the Black Lives Matter revolution, which, combined, are wreak- ing unprecedented havoc and destruction — political, social, economic, moral, and spiritual — worldwide. As we will show, these two seemingly unrelated upheavals are very closely tied together, and are but the latest and most profound manifesta- tions of a global revolutionary transfor- mation that has been under way for many years. Both of these revolutions are being stoked and orchestrated by elitist forces that intend to unmake the United States of America and extinguish liberty as we know it everywhere. In his famous “Lectures on the French Revolution,” delivered at Cambridge University between 1895 and 1899, the distinguished British historian and states- man John Emerich Dalberg, more com- monly known as Lord Acton, noted: “The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization.
    [Show full text]
  • UMBC UGC New Course Request: HIST 386: Hindus, Muslims, and Their Others: Identities in India & Pakistan Amy Froide Froide@U
    UMBC UGC New Course Request: HIST 386: Hindus, Muslims, and their Others: Identities in India & Pakistan Date Submitted: 9/4/19 Proposed Effective Date: Spring 2020 Name Email Phone Dept Dept Chair Amy Froide [email protected] 410-455- History or UPD 2033 Other Contact COURSE INFORMATION: Course Number(s) Hindus, Muslims, and their Others: The Construction of Identities in India and Formal Title Pakistan Transcript Title (≤30c) India and Pakistan from 1857-Present Recommended Course Preparation Lower level SS course Prerequisite NOTE: Unless otherwise indicated, a prerequisite is N/A assumed to be passed with a “D” or better. # of Credits Must adhere to the UMBC Credit Hour 3.0 Policy Repeatable for Yes X No additional credit? Max. Total Credits 3.0 This should be equal to the number of credits for courses that cannot be repeated for credit. For courses that may be repeated for credit, enter the maximum total number of credits a student can receive from this course. E.g., enter 6 credits for a 3 credit course that may be taken a second time for credit, but not for a third time. Please note that this does NOT refer to how many times a class may be retaken for a higher grade. Grading Method(s) X Reg (A-F) Audit Pass-Fail PROPOSED CATALOG DESCRIPTION (Approximately 75 words in length. Please use full sentences.): This course explores the complexities of the categories of Hindus, Muslims, and their Others from the mid- 19th century to the present in South Asia (the regions that would become India, Pakistan, and Kashmir).
    [Show full text]
  • Awards Dinner to Honor Reporting in a Year of Crisis
    THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB OF AMERICA, NEW YORK, NY • March-April 2016 Awards Dinner to Honor Reporting in a Year of Crisis EVENT PREVIEW: April 28 By Chad Bouchard Europe’s refugee crisis and deadly terrorist attacks are in focus in this year’s Dateline magazine, which will be shared at the OPC’s Annual Awards Dinner on April 28. The issue – and the gala event – honors the work of international journalists covering up- Christopher Michel Jonas Fredwall Karlsson Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images heaval in the face of growing threats, Left to right: Kai Ryssdal of Marketplace, David Fanning of PBS FRONTLINE which OPC President Marcus Mabry and Jason Rezaian of The Washington Post. said makes the work of correspon- President’s Award. In a message to press freedom candle in memory of dents harder and ever more essential. Fanning offering the award, Mabry journalists who have died in the line Kai Ryssdal, host and senior edi- praised FRONTLINE and Fanning’s of duty in the past year and in honor of tor of American Public Media’s Mar- “extraordinary, defining” work since those injured, missing and abducted. ketplace, will be our presenter. Rys- the show’s first season in 1983. Fan- The dinner will be held at the Man- sdal joined Marketplace in 2005, and ning retired as executive producer last darin Oriental Hotel on Columbus has hosted the show from China, the year after 33 seasons, and still serves Circle, and begins with a reception at Middle East and across the United States. This year’s 22 award winners at the series’ executive producer at 6:00 p.m., sponsored by multinational were selected from more than 480 large.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTERFEIT MEDICINE: Is It Curing China?
    COUNTERFEIT MEDICINE: Is It Curing China? NATASHA WONG, ESQ.* I. INTRODUCTION II. OVERVIEW OF CHINA’S PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY III. WHAT IS THE REALITY? A. Lack of Reported Cases B. Sophistication of Counterfeiters IV. SOLVING THE DILEMMA—CHINA’S LEGISLATIVE SOLUTIONS A. Pharmaceutical Administration Law B. Civil and Administrative Penalties C. Criminal Penalties D. Enforcement—Has the Solution Worked? 1. Entry of Organized Crime 2. Military and Police Corruption V. WHY IS THERE A MARKET FOR COUNTERFEIT MEDICATIONS? A. Lack of Consumer Education B. Unaffordable Medication 1. Looking for Alternatives 2. The Added Costs of Manufacturing Medicine 3. Is Social Insurance to Provide Healthcare to More Chinese? 4. Changes to China’s Healthcare System C. Black Market Provides Jobs VI. IMPACT OF COUNTERFEIT MEDICATIONS IN CHINA A. Population Development B. Danger to AIDS Treatments C. Easily Accessible—The Example of Viagra VII. IMPACT OF COUNTERFEIT MEDICINE OUTSIDE OF CHINA A. Presence in Developed Countries 1. Smuggling through Mexico 2. At the Canadian Border B. Internet Facilitates Distribution VIII. CONCLUSION * Natasha Wong is a lawyer from San Diego, California. She is the Executive Director of Chinese Professional Services. She is also serving on the Board of Directors of the Chinese Social Service Center of San Diego and the vice principal of the Chinese School of San Diego. She received her B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley, J.D. from Whittier Law School, and LL.M. from the University of San Diego. Her education includes studies at Shi-Da University, Taiwan, and at Oxford University, England. She would like to thank her husband and parents for their endless patience and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of India; Indian and Pakistan Independent Dimensions
    © 2020 IJRAR April 2020, Volume 7, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) Division of India; Indian and Pakistan Independent Dimensions – An overview *Nagaratna.B.Tamminal, Asst Professor of History, Govt First Grade Womens’s College, Koppal. Abstract Present paper takes a broad overview of independence on Indian subcontinent particularly India and Pakistan in their subsequent post independence dimensions. In August, 1947, when, after three hundred years in India, the British finally left, the subcontinent was partitioned into two independent nation states: Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan. Immediately, there began one of the greatest migrations in human history, as millions of Muslims trekked to West and East Pakistan (the latter now known as Bangladesh) while millions of Hindus and Sikhs headed in the opposite direction. Many hundreds of thousands never made it.Across the Indian subcontinent, communities that had coexisted for almost a millennium attacked each other in a terrifying outbreak of sectarian violence, with Hindus and Sikhs on one side and Muslims on the other—a mutual genocide as unexpected as it was unprecedented. In Punjab and Bengal—provinces abutting India’s borders with West and East Pakistan, respectively—the carnage was especially intense, with massacres, arson, forced conversions, mass abductions, and savage sexual violence. Some seventy-five thousand women were raped, and many of them were then disfigured or dismembered. Nisid Hajari, in “Midnight’s Furies” (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt), his fast-paced new narrative history of Partition and its aftermath, writes, “Gangs of killers set whole villages aflame, hacking to death men and children and the aged while carrying off young women to be raped.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia
    INDONESIA’S TRANSFORMATION and the Stability of Southeast Asia Angel Rabasa • Peter Chalk Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited ProjectR AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rabasa, Angel. Indonesia’s transformation and the stability of Southeast Asia / Angel Rabasa, Peter Chalk. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1344.” ISBN 0-8330-3006-X 1. National security—Indonesia. 2. Indonesia—Strategic aspects. 3. Indonesia— Politics and government—1998– 4. Asia, Southeastern—Strategic aspects. 5. National security—Asia, Southeastern. I. Chalk, Peter. II. Title. UA853.I5 R33 2001 959.804—dc21 2001031904 Cover Photograph: Moslem Indonesians shout “Allahu Akbar” (God is Great) as they demonstrate in front of the National Commission of Human Rights in Jakarta, 10 January 2000. Courtesy of AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE (AFP) PHOTO/Dimas. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Maritta Tapanainen © Copyright 2001 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying,
    [Show full text]
  • Ang Lee's Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
    The Global Return of the Wu Xia Pian (Chinese Sword-Fighting Movie): Ang Lee’s Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon by Kenneth Chan Abstract: In examining the way Ang Lee’s Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon grapples with cultural identity and Chineseness, this essay considers Lee’s construction of an image of “China” in the film, as well as its feminist possibilities. These readings reveal Lee’s conflicted critique of traditional Chinese cultural centrism and patri- archal hegemony. The wu xia pian, or Chinese sword-fighting movie, occupies a special place in the cultural memory of my childhood.1 Growing up in the late 1970s and early 1980s in Singapore, I remember with great fondness escaping from the British-based education system I attended and from the blazing heat of the tropical sun to the air-conditioned coolness of the neighborhood cinema. (This was long before cineplexes became fashionable.) Inevitably, a sword-fighting or kung fu flick from Hong Kong would be screening. The exoticism of one-armed swordsmen, fighting Shaolin monks, and women warriors careening weightlessly across the screen in- formed my sense and (mis)understanding of Chinese culture, values, and notions of “Chineseness” more radically than any Chinese-language lessons in school could have. The ideological impact of this genre should clearly not be underestimated, as cinematic fantasy is sutured into the cultural and political imaginary of China, particularly for the Chinese in diaspora.2 Like many moviegoers of Chinese ethnicity, I responded to Ang Lee’s cin- ematic epic Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) with genuine enthusiasm and anticipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Author of 'Forgotten' Addresses Capacity Crowd
    THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB OF AMERICA, NEW YORK, NY • November 2015 Author of ‘Forgotten’ Addresses Capacity Crowd EVENT RECAP a top editor at Newsweek, moderated the discussion. By Chad Bouchard He asked Hervieux why this Author and freelance journalist unit of black soldiers had Linda Hervieux drew a record-break- been picked for this danger- ing crowd of more than 100 attend- ous assignment. ees at Club Quarters on Nov. 4 for Hervieux said some an OPC Book Night to launch For- people theorized that it was gotten: The Untold Story of D-Day’s meant to be a suicide mis- Black Heroes, at Home and at War. sion, but she thinks the deci- Carrie Crow Hervieux told the standing-room sion to send them had more -only crowd that when she started re- to do with growing pres- Linda Hervieux, right, points to a barrage bal- loon as moderator Mark Whitaker looks on. searching the men of the 320th Bar- sure from groups like the rage Balloon Battalion – the only unit NAACP and possibly even serve Germans. of African American combat soldiers from Eleanor Roosevelt, who had In Virginia, a black man could still to land on D-Day – a central question advocated for better treatment of be charged with rape for making eye emerged. black soldiers, to provide more in- contact with a white woman. “I wanted to know why I didn’t teresting and important assignments When en route from Tennessee to know this history,” she said. for them. New York, black soldiers in segre- The Barrage Balloon Battalion Black soldiers not only faced the gated cars drew the curtains because deployed balloons on tethers to tan- horrors of war – they also experi- “Dixie whites often fired at train cars gle low-flying aircraft and prevent enced apalling racism on the home- carrying black men.” strafing attacks during the D-Day in- front.
    [Show full text]
  • HEADQUARTERS GAZETTE Is a Publication of the Society for Military History
    HEADQUARTERS GAZETTE SOCIETY FOR MILITARY HISTORY VOL. 32, NO. 2 SUMMER 2019 SMH 2020 CALL FOR PAPERS 87th Annual Meeting of the Society for Military History “Policy by Other Means” April 30-May 3, 2020 Hosted by the Army Historical Foundation The Society for Military History is pleased to announce a call for papers for its 87th Annual Meeting, hosted by the Army Historical Foundation in Arlington, VA. For the 2020 meeting, the Program Committee will consider paper and panel proposals on all aspects of military history, especially encouraging submissions that reflect on this year’s theme, Policy by Other Means. We invite submissions that examine war and other military operations as instruments of policy, to include topics such as grand strategy, coalition warfare, military diplomacy, humanitarian interventions, peacekeeping and nation building, military occupation and government, and “gray zone” competition, as well as the pursuit of domestic policy objectives via military means. While submissions that address the conference theme are encouraged, submissions that focus on other topics will also be entertained by the Program Committee. Submissions of pre-organized panels and roundtables are strongly encouraged and will be given preference in the selection process. Panel, paper, and poster proposals will clearly explain their topics and questions in ways that will be understandable to the broad membership of the SMH, not only to those interested in the specific topics in question. Additionally, the SMH encourages the representation of the full diversity of its membership and especially values panel and roundtable proposals that reflect the organization’s diversity of institutional affiliations, various career paths and ranks, gender, race, and ethnicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Winners of the Overseas Press Club Awards
    2010 dateline SPECIAL EDITION CARACAS, VENEZUELA WINNERS OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB AWARDS dateline 2010 1 LETTERFROM THE PRESIDENT t the Overseas Press Club of America, we are marching through our 71st year insisting that fact-based, hard-news reporting from abroad is more important than ever. As we salute the winners of our 20 awards, I am proud to say their work is a tribute to the public’s right to know. As new forms of communication erupt, the incessant drumbeat of the A24-hour news cycle threatens to overwhelm the public desire for information by swamping readers and viewers with instant mediocrity. Our brave winners – and IS PROUD the news organizations that support them – reject the temptation to oversimplify, trivialize and then abandon important events as old news. For them, and for the OPC, the earthquakes in Haiti and Chile, the shifting fronts in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, the drug wars of Mexico and genocides and commodity grabs in Africa need to be covered thoroughly and with integrity. TO SUPPORT The OPC believes quality journalism will create its own market. In spite of the decimation of the traditional news business, worthwhile journalism can and will survive. Creators of real news will get paid a living wage and the young who desire to quest for the truth will still find journalism viable as a proud profession and a civic good. We back that belief with our OPC Foundation, which awards 12 scholarships a year to deserving students who express their desire to become foreign correspondents while submitting essays on international subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • India Trilateral Forum 14
    India Trilateral Forum 14 22-23 March 2018 Goa, India Table of Contents About 2 Logistical Information 3 Discussion Model 4 Directions 5 Agenda 6 List of Participants 10 Participant Biographies 14 1 About India Trilateral Forum The India Trilateral Forum is the leading regular dialogue between Americans, Europeans and Indians involved in influencing, crafting and implementing national and foreign policies. Twice each year since 2010, the Forum has convened government officials, intellectuals, media commentators and business representatives for an intimate conversation on shared political, social and economic objectives as well as the implications of India's rise for the transatlantic community. The Forum has been held in Europe (Stockholm and London), and in three cities in India (New Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru). In 13 editions over eight years, the Forum has engaged over 350 key individuals, including leading politicians and government officials, influential columnists, representatives from top businesses, and renowned policy experts from India, the United States and Europe. Format The café-style format of the forum is designed to create a conversation between peers. While panellists are expected to help lead the conversation, they are only asked to give scene-setting remarks of around five to seven minutes, preserving the majority of the session for an open back and forth between all of the participants in the room. India Trilateral Forum is held under the Chatham House Rule, which states: When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • JUE Volume 11 Issue 1, 2021 38
    “We are similar, but different”: Contextualizing the Religious Identities of Indian and Pakistani Immigrant Groups Ravi Sadhu Claremont McKenna College, [email protected] ABSTRACT This article explores how Indian and Pakistani immigrant groups from the Bay Area in North California relate to and interact with one another. There is limited research on the role of religion in shaping sentiments of distinctiveness or “groupness” among diasporic Indians and Pakistanis in the UK and North America. Through conducting qualitative interviews with 18 Indian and Pakistani immigrants in the Bay Area, I recognized three factors pertaining to religion that were salient in influencing notions of groupness—notions of modernity, sociopolitical factors, and rituals. With respect to these three variables, I flesh out the spectrum of associated groupness; while some factors were linked with high levels of groupness, others enabled the immigrant groups to find commonality with one another. This research is integral to a better understanding of the interactions between South Asians in the diaspora, as well as to gain insight into how these immigrant groups—whose countries of origin share a history of religious conflict—perceive and interact with one another. Keywords: Indian-Pakistani immigrant interactions; religious othering; Hindu-Muslim relations ISSN 2369-8721 | The JUE Volume 11 Issue 1, 2021 38 India and Pakistan swiftly moved to consolidate their nations and to define themselves as autonomous states using all the national apparel they could muster.… None of this is too surprising, but the ‘other’ state necessarily became an object of comparison, a counterpoint, and was, to a greater or lesser e share the same food, same extent, vilified in the process” (208).
    [Show full text]