DOCSLIB.ORG

Intermodality - Serbia As the Hinterland of the Port of Bar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intermodality - Serbia As the Hinterland of the Port of Bar Intermodality - Serbia as the hinterland of the Port of Bar Sanja Bojić, Associate Professor, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad Geographical position and transport network of Serbia Serbia is a landlocked country situated at the crossroads of Central and Southeast Europe, in the middle of three geo-political entities: Danube macro-region, Adriatic-Ionian macro-region and Western Balkan 6 initiative. By analyzing and assessing the geostrategic and geopolitical comparative advantages of the Republic of Serbia in the wider European area, the main advantage of the Republic of Serbia is being the traffic connection of Western and Central Europe with Southeastern Europe and the Middle East, as well as the connection of Central European countries - the Middle Danube towards the South Adriatic, the Aegean and the Black Sea, or the Mediterranean. Serbia is crossed by the two main transport corridors recognized as Pan-European Corridors X and VII. According to the European Union TEN-T classification and latest indicative extension of TEN-T network to Western Balkan, former Pan-European corridors are replaced by branches of Orient/East-Med Corridor and Mediterranean corridor as shown at following pictures. Figure 1. Indicative extension of TEN-T network to Western Balkan [1] MultiAPPRO Multidisciplinary approach and solutions to development of intermodal transport in region 1 Main transport infrastructure in Serbia make sections of the main international corridors of the TEN – T core network (Corridor X, or Orient/East-Med Corridor and Mediterranean corridor and Corridor VII or Danube – Rhine – Main river corridor) and comprehensive network, where Routes 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9 are connecting Serbia with neighboring countries. Road network in Serbia has an approximate total length of 45.000 km, including approximately 800 km of highways, 5.000 km of first-level state roads, 11.000 km of second-level state roads and over 25.000 km of local roads. Railway network has approximate length of 5.000 km, out of which is only approximately 20% electrified and 10% double tracked. The railway network is mostly in poor condition with over 300 bottleneck spots, whose reconstruction is estimated to approximately 4 billion euros. However, at the moment, there is a great number of rehabilitations, re-construction and construction works on the network on-going. Highest development potential has the inland waterway transport (IWT). The Danube is the most important element of the inland waterway system in Serbia. With the Sava and the Tisa rivers, it creates a 1,680 km long network of waterways. The Danube’s section in Serbia (588 km) is navigable for all types of river ships. There are 8 international ports in the Serbian sector of the Danube: Apatin, Bezdan, Bačka Palanka, Novi Sad, Beograd, Pančevo, Smederevo and Prahovo. Currently, in accordance with the Strategy on Development of Waterborne Transport of the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2015 to 2025, a list of the most important investments is defined and initialized including: construction and reconstruction of Serbian ports, eliminating all critical sectors for navigation on the waterway network, further improvement of intelligent waterway transport systems. The most relevant parts of the transport network in Serbia for the intermodal connection to Montenegro is the section of the Route 4: road route Belgrade – South Adriatic E-763 and the railway route E-79. The Route Е-763: Belgrade – Pozega– Boljare (border with Montenegro) consists of 3 sectors: • Sector I Belgrade – Ljig (80.3 km) including sections: Belgrade (Surcin) – Obrenovac (17.6 km); Obrenovac – Ub (26.2 km); Ub– Lajkovac (12.5 km); Lajkovac – Ljig (24 km); • Sector II Ljig – Pozega (71.2 km) including sections: Ljig – Preljina (40.4 km); Preljina – Pozega (30.9 km) • Sector III Pozega – Boljare (border with Montenegro) (107 km). MultiAPPRO Multidisciplinary approach and solutions to development of intermodal transport in region 2 The most of the sector I and II of the Route E-763 have been constructed and reconstructed in the recent years (please see the Figure 2.). However, the sector III still remains as the project in the near future. [2] Figure 2. Status of the reconstruction of the route Е-763: Belgrade – Pozega– Boljare (border with Montenegro) [2] Regarding the railway route E-79, Serbian part of the railway line connecting Serbia and Montenegro will be reconstructed and modernized by the Russian Railways. According to the agreement, signed in Belgrade in January 2019, the reconstruction of the 210 km long railway section Valjevo – Vrbnica should start in 2022. The project will be financed with 57.5 million Euros from the Serbian national budget and with 172.5 million Euros from the Russian loan supported by the Russian Railways. MultiAPPRO Multidisciplinary approach and solutions to development of intermodal transport in region 3 Figure 3. Railway route Bar Belgrade [3] Unfortunately, there are no contemporary intermodal terminals in Serbia, but rather few bimodal container-handling terminals. Although, containers can be handled in some of the Serbian Railways marshaling stations as well as in the inland waterway ports on the Sava and Danube rivers, currently only four terminals in Serbia have regular railway connections with the sea ports in the region and are dedicated to the container handling on the daily basis. The terminals are located in Belgrade, Dobanovci, Sremska Mitrovica and Pančevo: 1. ŽIT Beograd 2. NELT Dobanovci 3. LEGET Sremska Mitrovica 4. DUNAV Pančevo. MultiAPPRO Multidisciplinary approach and solutions to development of intermodal transport in region 4 ŽIT terminal is located in Belgrade and represents the oldest road-rail terminal in Serbia. It is currently at the new location in the shipping park (park B) of the Belgrade railway station, the marshalling yard in Železnik. Although the new location now has only two tracks, ŽIT continued to service international container lines. In its current state, it can accommodate up to 4 trains a day. There is currently a problem with storage capacities of up to 1400 containers. According to the estimates of the ŽIT terminal, the existing container terminal covers about 40% of the total number of containers transported by rail, which represents about 15% of all containers coming to Serbia. The terminal has the regular liner service with the ports Rijeka, Kopar and Bar. The distance of the port of Bar from the ŽIT terminal measured on the railway infrastructure is only 476 km, which makes this port the closest port to this container terminal. NELT terminal is the central distribution and logistics center of the company NELT located in Dobanovci, near Belgrade. The terminal is connected by rail to all European ports and land terminals. The terminal is located 6 km of the intersection of the highways E-75 and E-70 and 10 km from the Airport Nikola Tesla. It offers regular weekly railway transport of containers to and from the ports of Rijeka and Pireus. [4] LEGET terminal is located in the Port of Sremska Mitrovica (75 km from Belgrade). It provides regular railway service to and from the port of Rijeka, several times a week. Considering that the terminal is located on the Sava river, theoretically it is possible transshipment of containers to the inland waterway vessels, however, it is not a standard service. The terminal handles between 10.000 and 15.000 containers a year. [5] DUNAV terminal is located in the Port of Pancevo. It started with its service in 2020. It is the first three modal terminal in Serbia. Its advantage in comparison to other terminals is its good traffic-geographical position, given that it is located at the intersection of two Pan-European corridors, Rhine-Main-Danube and road-railway corridor X, as well as at a distance of only 14 km from Belgrade. The current annual capacity of the terminal is 8,000 TEU with the possibility of expansion. [6] Economy and foreign trade of Serbia According to the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, the total import and export of Serbia in 2018 was 45,109 million USD. Thereat, 64% of the total external trade was with the European Union member states. The highest share of export of the Republic of Serbia had the Region Vojvodina (33.0%), followed by the Belgrade region (26.4%), the Region Šumadija and West Serbia (24.6%), the Region South and East Serbia (16.0%), and approximately 0.1% of total export is not classified by territories. The highest share of import of the Republic of Serbia had the Belgrade region (45.9%), followed by the Region Vojvodina (27.5%), the Region Šumadija and MultiAPPRO Multidisciplinary approach and solutions to development of intermodal transport in region 5 West Serbia (16.4%), the Region South and East Serbia (9.5%), and approximately 0.7% of total import is not classified by territories. [7] Structure of the export, according to the products’ destination (the principle of prevalence), was: reproduction products 55.6% (USD 9,442.0 million), then consumer goods 33.4% (USD 5,670.8 million) and equipment 11.1% (USD 1,883.1 million). Unclassified goods according to destination amounted to 0.9% (USD 1.2 million). Structure of the import, according to the products’ destination, was: reproduction products 57.7% (USD 12,642.3 million), then consumer goods 18.8% (USD 4,127.8 million) and equipment 12.5% (USD 2,733.9 million). Unclassified goods according to destination amounted to 11.0% (USD 2,416.5 million). [7] The major foreign trade partners of Serbia are presented in Table 1. Table 1. The major foreign trade partners of Serbia in 2018 [7] Exports USD million EUR million Imports USD million EUR million Italy 2237.0 1990.3 Germany 2774.6 2454.7 Germany 2131.5 1888.7 Italy 2207.5 1955.1 BiH 1371.3 1211.6 China 1767.7 1560.8 Russia 995.5 881.3 Russia 1586.2 1410.6 Romania 817.5 726.1 Hungary 1064.4 940.6 Serbian second major export/import partner are the CEFTA countries, with the surplus in external trade of USD 2051.6 million, resulting mainly from the exports of agricultural products, iron and steel, metal products, road vehicles; and import of iron and steel, hard coal and briquettes, fruit and vegetables, cork and wood.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the UNDA Workshop
    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Committee on Housing and Land Management Housing and Land Management Unit Report of the UNDA Workshop ‘Strengthening National Capacities for Sustainable Housing, Urban Development and Land Management: Development, Implementation and Monitoring of the National Action Plans’ 31 January – 2 February 2017 SUMMARY: UNECE (lead agency) in partnership with UN-Habitat (implementing partner) initiated the Project “Strengthening National Capacities for Sustainable Housing, Urban Development and Land Management: Development, Implementation and Monitoring of the National Action Plans”. UNECE, UN-Habitat and the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure of the Republic of Serbia, organized the workshop held on 31 January – 2 February in Belgrade, Serbia. This report provides an overview of the presentations, conclusions and recommendations deriving from the workshop. Contents: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3 ATTENDANCE ........................................................................................................................................... 4 DAY I [31 January 2017].......................................................................................................................... 6 Session 1: OPENING ............................................................................................................................. 6 Session 2: PRESENTATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Uredba O Utvrđivanju Jedinstvene Liste Razvijenosti Regiona I Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Za 2014
    UREDBA O UTVRĐIVANJU JEDINSTVENE LISTE RAZVIJENOSTI REGIONA I JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE ZA 2014. GODINU ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 104/2014) Član 1 Ovom uredbom utvrđuje se jedinstvena lista razvijenosti regiona, koji su prema stepenu razvijenosti razvrstani u razvijene i nedovoljno razvijene regione i jedinica lokalne samouprave, koje su razvrstane u prvu, drugu, treću i četvrtu grupu i devastirana područja na osnovu podataka organa nadležnog za poslove statistike i finansija. Član 2 Razvrstavanje regiona vrši se na osnovu vrednosti bruto-domaćeg proizvoda po glavi stanovnika u regionu u odnosu na republički prosek, za referentni period. Razvijeni regioni su regioni koji ostvaruju vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda iznad vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Beogradski region; 2) Region Vojvodine. Nedovoljno razvijeni regioni su regioni u kojima je vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda ispod vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Region Šumadije i Zapadne Srbije; 2) Region Južne i Istočne Srbije. Pored regiona iz stava 3. ovog člana, status nedovoljno razvijenog regiona ima Region Kosova i Metohije. Član 3 Prema stepenu razvijenosti jedinica lokalnih samouprava prvu grupu čini 20 jedinica lokalne samouprave čiji je stepen razvijenosti iznad republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Bačka Palanka; 2) Beograd; 3) Beočin; 4) Bor; 5) Valjevo; 6) Vrbas; 7) Vršac; 8) Kanjiža; 9) Kragujevac; 10) Lajkovac; 11) Niš; 12) Novi Sad; 13) Pančevo; 14) Pećinci; 15) Požarevac; 16) Senta; 17) Stara Pazova; 18) Subotica; 19) Užice; 20) Čačak. Prema stepenu razvijenosti
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • NOVI SAD - City Case Report City Development and Its Subsurface
    COST-SUBURBAN WG1 - NOVI SAD - City Case report City development and its subsurface University of Novi Sad Faculty of Technical Sciences Department of Traffic and Transportation Authors: Đurđica Stojanović, Marko Veličković In cooperation with: Ildiko Otašević, Public Enterprise for City Construction and Development, Novi Sad Aleksandar Jevđenić, Milan Šešum, Public enterprise "Urbanizam", Novi Sad Contents 1. Historical development of the city ................................................................. 3 2. City description ............................................................................................. 6 2.1 City location and key data.................................................................................. 6 2.2 Petrovaradin Fortress ........................................................................................ 7 3. Area characteristics ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 Geology .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Pedology .......................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Geomorphology ............................................................................................... 13 3.4 Groundwater .................................................................................................... 15 4. Urban infrastructure ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PUTARINA) Važi Od: 25
    Beograd, Bul. Kraqa Aleksandra 282 POSEBNA NAKNADA ZA UPOTREBU AUTOPUTA (PUTARINA) važi od: 25. februara 2021. god. u 07:00 h (po kusnoj listi NBS br. 173 od 10.09.2018. god.) BEOGRAD PUTARINA u RSD ROAD TOLL in EUR Deonica: Beograd - Preševo I-а I II III IV Naplatne stanice I-а I II III IV 40 80 120 230 460 MALI POŽAREVAC 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 4,00 50 100 160 310 630 UMČARI 0,50 1,00 1,50 3,00 5,50 70 130 190 390 770 VODANJ 1,00 1,50 2,00 3,50 7,00 80 150 230 460 930 KOLARI 1,00 1,50 2,00 4,00 8,00 90 180 270 540 1.070 SMEDEREVO 1,00 2,00 2,50 5,00 9,50 90 180 280 550 1.110 POŽAREVAC 1,00 2,00 2,50 5,00 9,50 150 300 460 910 1.830 VELIKA PLANA 1,50 3,00 4,00 8,00 15,50 180 350 530 1.060 2.120 MARKOVAC 2,00 3,00 4,50 9,00 18,00 190 380 570 1.140 2.280 LAPOVO 2,00 3,50 5,00 10,00 19,50 200 400 590 1.190 2.370 BATOČINA 2,00 3,50 5,00 10,50 20,50 250 490 730 1.460 2.920 JAGODINA 2,50 4,50 6,50 12,50 25,00 270 540 810 1.620 3.230 ĆUPRIJA 2,50 5,00 7,00 14,00 27,50 290 580 880 1.750 3.500 PARAĆIN 2,50 5,00 7,50 15,00 30,00 320 630 950 1.900 3.800 POJATE 3,00 5,50 8,50 16,50 32,50 350 690 1.030 2.060 4.120 RAŽANJ 3,00 6,00 9,00 17,50 35,00 390 770 1.160 2.310 4.630 ALEKSINAČKI RUDNICI 3,50 7,00 10,00 20,00 39,50 400 790 1.190 2.380 4.750 ALEKSINAC 3,50 7,00 10,50 20,50 40,50 450 890 1.340 2.680 5.360 NIŠ jug 4,00 8,00 11,50 23,00 45,50 460 920 1.380 2.750 5.500 MEROŠINA 4,00 8,00 12,00 23,50 46,50 480 960 1.440 2.880 5.770 DOLJEVAC SELO 4,50 8,50 12,50 24,50 49,00 500 990 1.480 2.960 5.920 BRESTOVAC 4,50 8,50 13,00 25,50 50,50 510 1.020 1.520
    [Show full text]
  • Šifra Naziv Mesto/Opština Plaćeno
    Šifra Naziv Mesto/Opština Plaćeno 1 STANIČIĆ ĐORĐE ARANĐELOVAC 24,000.00 2 PANTELIĆ SLAVIŠA ARANĐELOVAC 24,000.00 3 STOJANOVIĆ RADMILA ARANĐELOVAC 24,000.00 4 ĐORĐEVIĆ DRAGICA BATOČINA 24,000.00 5 DRENJANIN DOBRILA BEOGRAD 24,000.00 6 ŽIVKOVIĆ BUDIMIR BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 7 ĐURĐEVIĆ VIDOSAVA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 8 PAUNOVIĆ SLOBODAN BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 9 SRETENOVIĆ DUŠICA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 10 BERAJ SEVDIJA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 11 BEJZAKU ĐULIJANA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 12 HAMZIĆ SUZANA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 13 DENČIĆ DEJAN BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 14 JOVANOVIĆ VOJISLAV BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 15 GRAŠIĆ ŽIVOJIN BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 16 VAŠALIĆ DUŠKA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 17 JANIĆIJEVIĆ MILENA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 18 PAVKOVIĆ TANJA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 19 JOCIĆ STANIŠA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 20 SPAHIĆ SNEŽANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 21 MARJANOVIĆ MIRSADA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 22 MARINKOVIĆ MIROSLAV BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 23 MORINA SMILJANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 24 NIKOLIĆ NIŠA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 72,000.00 25 ŠABANOVIĆ SAFET BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 26 TODOROVIĆ MILAN BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 27 STANIMIROVIĆ SNEŽANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 28 PETRULJEVIĆ PERA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 29 JOVIČIĆ MILORAD BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 30 ČOLAKOVIĆ LJLJANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 31 JOVANOV SVETLANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 32 NIKOLIĆ ČEDOMIR BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 48,000.00 33 SMOLOVIĆ BLAGOJE BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 34 GAŠIĆ ZVONKO
    [Show full text]
  • Together Against Covid
    TOGETHER AGAINST COVID Together Against COVID is a one-year, $1,000,000 project that aims to provide an efficient response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia in the area of health, social and environmental protection. It encompasses support for the Serbian Ministry of Health; the National Public Health Institute “Dr Milan Jovanović Batut”; and the Ministry of Labor, Employment, Veteran and Social Affairs. ACTIVITIES IN SERBIA 1. Procuring ambulances for primary, secondary and tertiary health centers to help patients throughout the country safely reach medical facilities and receive life-saving assistance. 2. Equipping a communications hub at the Public Health Institute “Dr Milan Jovanović Batut” in Belgrade and regional and local public health institutes to coordinate COVID-19 immunization and response, as well as future public health emergencies. 3. Procuring communications equipment for public centers for the elderly to enable them to stay in touch and communicate safely with their families during and following the pandemic. 4. Procuring basic waste management equipment to safely dispose of medical waste resulting from the massive vaccination process and ensure that the impact of COVID-19 on the environment in Serbia is minimized. RESULTS • 11 ambulances procured for health care institutions in Serbia: Ljig, Merošina, the general hospital in Jagodina (2), Veliko Gradište, the General Hospital in Loznica, Bogatić, Kraljevo, Vranje, Svrljig, and the Special Hospital for Nonspecific Lung Diseases in Sokobanja. • Public Health Institute (PHI) Batut premises in Belgrade refurbished to host the Communications Hub. • ICT equipment (tablets and TV sets) procured for 36 public centers for the elderly.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Construction of Regional Waste Management Centre “Kalenic” Serbia August 2021
    NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Construction of Regional Waste Management Centre “Kalenic” Serbia August 2021 Contents Abbreviation List Abbreviation Full name Contents ................................................................................................................... 1 AFD Agence Française de Développement Abbreviation List ..................................................................................................... 1 CESMP Construction Environmental and Social Management Plan 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 CLO Compost Like Output Company Eko-Tamnava d.o.o. Ub .................................................................. 2 E&S Environmental and Social Current waste collection practices in the Region ............................................ 2 EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 2 Project description ........................................................................................... 3 EIA Environmental Impact Assessment Project alternatives .......................................................................................... 4 ESAP Environmental Social Action Plan EU European Union 3 Environmental and Social Impacts .................................................................. 5 H&S Health & Safety Environmental Impact Assessment Process .................................................... 5 HR Human Resources Project benefits ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS the FUTURE of TRADITION MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS the Future of Tradition
    THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE MAGAZINE NO 9 | JUNE 2019 | ISSN 2683-5282 MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS THE FUTURE OF TRADITION MUSEUMS AS CULTURAL HUBS The Future of Tradition May 13-19, 2019 FOR MUSEUMS MUSEUMS OF SERBIA International Museum Day - European Night of Museums - National Museum Week Free Admission 2 ICOM SRBIJA A WORD FROM PRESIDENT Jubilee Year From content This year, museum pro- fessionals will gather at the jubilee, 25th ICOM General Conference in magical Kyoto. There is plenty of symbol- 4 ism in the fact that the ICOM 25th General Conference - Kyoto 2019 Land of the Rising Sun is hosting 3,000 partic- Redefined Future of Tradition ipants who are going to discuss important is- sues of concern to the international museum 6 Interview community. This will be the right opportunity for Suay Aksoy, the new museum defi- nition to “rise” so as to ICOM President reflect the changed role of museums which have developed a closer bond 16 with the audience and New Museums become a more active part of the community The Largest Serbian Museum they belong to. Abroad The central theme of this year’s Conference, Museums as Cultural Hubs: The Future of Tradition, was exactly the thread that bonded 26 museums all over Serbia during the event Museums for 10, coor- International Cooperation dinated by ICOM Serbia. For the fifth time, the largest museum ini- Museum Connections tiative in Serbia presented museums as places where creativity and On The Silk Road knowledge unite, and visitors take an active part in creating and -ex changing ideas, and interact with each other, prioritizing the quality of knowledge exchange and development of critical awareness of major issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Towns in Serbia – the “Bridge” Between the Urban and the Rural
    Europ. Countrys. · 4· 2016 · p. 462-480 DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0031 European Countryside MENDELU SMALL TOWNS IN SERBIA – THE “BRIDGE” BETWEEN THE URBAN AND THE RURAL Marko Filipović, Vlasta Kokotović Kanazir, Marija Drobnjaković1 1 MSc Filipović Marko, ResearchAssociate MSc, Kokotović Kanazir Vlasta Research Associate, MSc Drobnjaković Marija (corresponding author) ResearchAssociate Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, Belgrade; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 462/480 Received 16 April 2016; Accepted 19 July 2016 Abstract: The study presented in this paper deals with the definition and role of small towns in the spatial development of the Republic of Serbia. An analysis of the profiles of small towns was performed and they were compared based on their spatial and population characteristics. The aim of this study is to determine the role of small towns in the development of settlement networks and the balanced population development of a country as a whole by identifying their specific features and establishing a ranking of their importance in local and regional contexts. Key words: urban settlement, small town, role, Serbia Abstrakt: Istraživanje u ovom radu odnosi se na problematiku malih gradova, njihovog definisanja i uloge u prostornom razvoju Republike Srbije. Izvršena je analiza I komparacija profila malih gradova kroz njihove prostorne i demografske karakteristike. Cilj rada je da odredi ulogu malih gradova u razvoju mreže naselja, kao i uravnoteženom populacionom razvoju zemlje, kroz sagledavanje njihovih specifičnosti i gradaciju značaja u lokalnim I regionalnim okvirima. Ključne reči: gradska naselja, mali gradovi, uloga, Srbija 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Infrastructure in the Western Balkans Opportunities and Challenges
    European Department Public Infrastructure in the Western Balkans Opportunities and Challenges Ruben Atoyan, Dora Benedek, Ezequiel Cabezon, Giuseppe Cipollone, Jacques Miniane, Nhu Nguyen, Martin Petri, Jens Reinke, and James Roaf INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND Copyright ©2018 International Monetary Fund Cataloging-in-Publication Data Joint Bank-Fund Library Names: Atoyan, Ruben. | Benedek, Dora. | Cabezon, Ezequiel. | Cipollone, Giuseppe. | Miniane, Jacques. | Nguyen, Nhu. | Petri, Martin. | Reinke, Jens. | Roaf, James. | International Monetary Fund. | International Monetary Fund. European Department. Title: Public Infrastructure in the Western Balkans: Shifting Gears—Opportunities and Challenges/ prepared by Ruben Atoyan, Dora Benedek, Ezequiel Cabezon, Giuseppe Cipollone, Jacques Miniane, Nhu Nguyen, Martin Petri, Jens Reinke, and James Roaf. Description: Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2017. | At head of title: European Department. | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: ISBN 978-1-48433-718-9 (paper) Subjects: Growth. | Infra- structure | Europe—Economic Conditions. | Emerging Markets. Classification: HC.xxx.xxxx] 2017 pages ; cm. – (European departmental paper series) The Departmental Paper Series presents research by IMF staff on issues of broad regional or cross-country interest. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. Publication orders may be placed online, by fax, or through the mail: International
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap Towards the DBS Gateway Region
    Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Roadmap towards the DBS Gateway Region Final Report Vienna, October 2018 WP4 – Regional Action Plan Document Control Sheet Project DBS Gateway Region – regional and Transport Development in the Danube-Black Sea Region towards a Transnational Multiport Gateway Region Code DTP1-050-3.1 Funds ERDF, IPA Document Title Final Report Step II Roadmap + Regional Action Plans Nature Report, Output O4.1 Available Languages English Version 1 Date October 2018 Number of Pages 190 Authors Christina Narval Contributors All partners of the project Checked by LP Approved by SCOM Content 2 WP4 – Regional Action Plan CONTENT 1 Importance of Action – Why a Roadmap? ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Danube-Black Sea (DBS) Gateway Region ......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Objectives – Roadmap supporting the Joint Vision 2040 .................................................................. 7 2 Roadmap within the project “DBS Gateway Region” ................................................................................ 9 2.1 Structure of the project ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Position of the Roadmap within the project ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]