Inquiry Into the Public Health Strategies Related to Cannabis Use and the Most Appropriate Legal Status
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Legalizing Marijuana: California's Pot of Gold?
University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2009 Legalizing Marijuana: California’s Pot of Gold? Michael Vitiello Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Vitiello, Legalizing Marijuana: California’s Pot of Gold?, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 1349. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY LEGALIZING MARUUANA: CALIFORNIA'S POT OF GOLD? MICHAEL VITIELLO* In early 2009, a member of the California Assembly introduced a bill that would have legalized marijuana in an effort to raise tax revenue and reduce prison costs. While the bill's proponent withdrew the bill, he vowed to renew his efforts in the next term. Other prominent California officials, including Governor Schwarzenegger, have indicated their willingness to study legalization in light of California's budget shortfall. For the first time in over thirty years, politicians are giving serious consideration to a proposal to legalize marijuana. But already, the public debate has degenerated into traditional passionate advocacy, with ardent prohibitionists raising the specter of doom, and marijuana advocates promising billions of dollars in tax revenues and reduced prison costs. Rather than rehashing the old debate about legalizing marijuana, this Essay offers a balanced view of the proposal to legalize marijuana, specifically as a measure to raise revenue and to reduce prison costs. -
Product Disclosure Statement Initial Public Offering of Ordinary Shares in Rua Bioscience Limited
Product Disclosure Statement Initial Public Offering of ordinary shares in Rua Bioscience Limited This document gives you important information about this investment to help you 25th September 2020 decide whether you want to invest. There is other useful information about this offer on LEAD MANAGER CO-MANAGER disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz/. Rua Bioscience Limited has prepared this document in accordance with the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. You can also seek advice from a financial adviser to help you to make an investment decision. 2 RUA Bioscience Limited • Key information summary Key information summary 1.1 Rua has secured a sales agreement with leading German wholesale importer and distributor Nimbus Health GmbH What is this? (Nimbus), and has developed two commercial-scale facilities: a controlled cultivation facility in Ruatorea and an extraction This is an offer of ordinary shares (Offer Shares) in Rua and manufacturing facility in Gisborne. By prioritising Bioscience Limited (Rua or the Company). Ordinary shares in wholesale exports in the short term, Rua intends to generate Rua give you a stake in the ownership of Rua. You may receive revenue to support its on-going investment into a range of long a return if dividends are paid or Rua increases in value and you term value opportunities, including genetics research, product are able to sell your Shares at a higher price than you paid development, clinical trials and brand development. for them. Rua holds a Medicinal Cannabis Licence from New Zealand’s If Rua runs into financial difficulties and is wound up, you will Medicinal Cannabis Agency, permitting it to operate in be paid only after all creditors have been paid. -
Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2012
A.2 Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2012 Parliamentary Service Commission Te Komihana O Te Whare Pāremata Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Schedule 2, Clause 11 of the Parliamentary Service Act 2000 About the Parliamentary Service Commission The Parliamentary Service Commission (the Commission) is constituted under the Parliamentary Service Act 2000. The Commission has the following functions: • to advise the Speaker on matters such as the nature and scope of the services to be provided to the House of Representatives and members of Parliament; • recommend criteria governing funding entitlements for parliamentary purposes; • recommend persons who are suitable to be members of the appropriations review committee; • consider and comment on draft reports prepared by the appropriations review committees; and • to appoint members of the Parliamentary Corporation. The Commission may also require the Speaker or General Manager of the Parliamentary Service to report on matters relating to the administration or the exercise of any function, duty, or power under the Parliamentary Service Act 2000. Membership The membership of the Commission is governed under sections 15-18 of the Parliamentary Service Act 2000. Members of the Commission are: • the Speaker, who also chairs the Commission; • the Leader of the House, or a member of Parliament nominated by the Leader of the House; • the Leader of the Opposition, or a member of Parliament nominated by the Leader of the Opposition; • one member for each recognised party that is represented in the House by one or more members; and • an additional member for each recognised party that is represented in the House by 30 or more members (but does not include among its members the Speaker, the Leader of the House, or the Leader of the Opposition). -
Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration
Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs. -
An Economic Perspective on the Legalisation Debate: the Dutch Case
AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE LEGALISATION DEBATE: THE DUTCH CASE Martijn Adriaan Boermans* Introduction Understanding the consequences of drug legalisation versus prohibition is important for policy. Most recently this subject has gained much political attention not only globally, but specifically in the Netherlands.1 This study will provide a contribution to the legalisation debate based on a microeconomic analysis of the effects of illegal markets. The research question is how to design a coherent soft drugs policy framework that maximizes social welfare within the Netherlands that precludes most historical, sociological and political debates. In particular, attention is restricted to ‘soft drugs’ better known as cannabis derived products like hashish and marijuana.2 The focus is on the Dutch case, since traditionally the Netherlands has been a forerunner in terms of drug-related policies, as exemplified by coffeeshops. In a country with a population of 16 million about 1 million indicate to use soft drugs on a regular basis. Almost all consumers buy soft drugs in coffeeshops.3 Interestingly, there is no stereotypical Dutch soft drug consumer, since users are representative of the Dutch population, for example in terms of education levels. Prices vary between 150-250 euro per * M.A. Boermans, MPhil, is a PhD Candidate and works for the Innovation and Business Centre (InnBus) at the Hogeschool Utrecht where he also is Lecturer. His other works include economic papers on international trade. He holds a research master degree in Multidisciplinary Economics from the Universiteit Utrecht and obtained his undergraduate degree from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Corresponding email: [email protected]. -
Issue 17 2017
Shifting Stones Ruckus over Ruggers Centre Stage Catriona Britton examines the harm being done Mark Fullerton talks SKY TV’s very bad A chat with New Zealand theatre company to an historical site manners Indian Ink [1] ISSUE SEVENTEEN CONTENTS 7 NEWS 10 COMMUNITY MED STUDENTS SICK OF LOAN CAP THE LIMITS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH Medical students aren’t getting graduation caps because of A look at how New Zealand student loan caps deals with censorship 13 LIFESTYLE 16 FEATURES SPRING AWAKENING TIT FOR TATT We’ve got tips on how to make your garden bloomin’ beautiful Olivia Stanley ponders society’s this Spring view of tattoos 31 ARTS 34 COLUMNS ONE MOVIE TO RULE THEM ALL A SHADOW OF HER FORMER SELF A definitive ranking of the LOTR and Hobbit movie Caitlin Abley has had a gutsful trilogies of Shadows cuisine New name. Same DNA. ubiq.co.nz 100% Student owned - your store on campus [3] NOTICE OF POLLING TIMES FOR THE 2018 AUSA EXECUTIVE & 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OFFICER ELECTIONS ONLINE ELECTIONS WILL BE HELD FROM 9AM ON TUESDAY 22ND TO 4PM ON THURSDAY 24TH OF AUGUST 2017 TO VOTE GO TO: WWW.AUSA.ORG.NZ/VOTE ONLY AUSA MEMBERS CAN VOTE, HOWEVER YOU CAN SIGN UP ONLINE WHEN YOU VOTE. A POLLING BOOTH WILL BE AVAILABLE AT AUSA RECEPTION IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO ONLINE VOTING. LIFE MEMBERS WILL NEED TO GO TO AUSA RECEPTION TO VOTE. BOB LACK AUSA RETURNING OFFICER NOTICE OF POLLING TIMES FOR THE EDITORIAL 2018 AUSA EXECUTIVE Catriona Britton Samantha Gianotti & 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OFFICER ELECTIONS Giving a Shit ONLINE ELECTIONS WILL BE HELD FROM 9AM ON TUESDAY 22ND Last Monday morning, one Craccum Editor was make it into the top ten that God cast down on with deliberation and confidence. -
Cannabis in New Zealand Perceptions of Use, Users and Policy
Cannabis in New Zealand perceptions of use, users and policy Geoff Noller A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Otago, Christchurch Aotearoa, New Zealand November 5, 2008 ABSTRACT Introduction Despite humanity’s lengthy relationship with psychoactive substances, their consumption in contemporary societies is perceived as highly problematic. Cannabis, the most commonly imbibed illicit psychotropic, has come to embody these concerns. Medical and scientific research informs notions of use and user, with these being further constructed in the public realm by law, the media and policy against a backdrop of health deficits and other harms including risk taking, criminality and deviance. With many studies drawing on clinical populations, e.g. high intensity users or those in treatment, a pathologized view of the user predominates. Where general population studies incorporate user data, these typically concentrate on the epidemiology of use: frequency, intensity, duration, and symptoms of abuse and dependence. This, however, tells us little about the meaning of use for users or why use continues despite universal official disapprobation. A lack of studies incorporating user perspectives thus ensures the limited focus of much present research and a policy accent on supply reduction at the expense of harm minimisation and safe use education. Those choosing to continue use are stigmatised as deviant or dependant. This has the effect of further bolstering enforcement, a strategy showing little evidence of efficacy. The present study sought a comparison between this dominant discourse on cannabis use and the perspectives of users, with a range of exploratory hypotheses being identified. Method Eighty cannabis-using respondents participated in open-ended face-to-face interviews, of which seventy-six successfully completed a follow-up questionnaire. -
Selling Cannabis Regulation: Learning from Ballot Initiatives in the United States in 2012
ISSN 2054-1910 Selling cannabis regulation: Learning From Ballot Initiatives in the United States in 2012 Emily Crick*, Mark Cooke¥ and Dave Bewley-Taylorp Policy Brief 6 | November 2014 Key Points • In November 2012, Washington, Colorado, and Oregon voted on ballot initiatives to establish legally regulated markets for the production, sale, use and taxation of cannabis.1 Washington and Colorado’s measures won by wide margins, while Oregon’s lost soundly. • A majority of voters view cannabis in a negative light, but also feel that prohibition for non-medical and non-scientific purposes is not working. As a result, they are more likely to support well-crafted reform policies that include strong regulations and direct tax revenue to worthy causes such as public health and education. • Ballot measures are not the ideal method for passing complicated pieces of legislation, but sometimes they are necessary for controversial issues. Other states often follow in their footsteps, including via the legislature. • The successful campaigns in Washington and Colorado relied on poll-driven messaging, were well organised, and had significant financing. The Oregon campaign lacked these elements. • The Washington and Colorado campaigns targeted key demographic groups, particularly 30-50 year old women, who were likely to be initially supportive of reform but then switch their allegiance to the ‘no’ vote. • Two key messages in Washington and Colorado were that legalisation, taxation and regulation will (i) free up scarce law enforcement resources to focus on more serious crimes and (ii) will create new tax revenue for worthy causes. • National attitudes on legalising cannabis are changing, with more and more people supporting reform. -
The Opportunities Party Real Deal Cannabis Reform
The Opportunities Party Real Deal Cannabis Reform PART 1: INTRODUCTION Our current drug law is outdated and not fit for purpose. The prohibition model set out under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 is a barrier for people seeking help if they need it. Drug addiction, like alcohol addiction tears families apart – but so does our drug law, which not only fails to protect people from harm, but actually adds to it.1 In overhauling this outdated Act The Opportunities Regular usage of cannabis is associated Party has developed an evidenced-based policy with health risk such as: that will more accurately reflect the internationally recognised intention of drug policy – to reduce harm. • problems with healthy brain development among youth; Assessing harm is an area that the current system • depression or anxiety injury; fails to effectively do. While the goal of the current • symptoms of chronic bronchitis;2 criminalisation policy is harm-minimisation based on the familiar strategies of controlling supply, However as with alcohol and cigarettes, reducing demand and limiting the problem – it fails abstinence is unrealistic. Prohibition flies in the to account for the effects of exposing users and face of popular demand and leads to illicit supply growers to gangs and to the criminal justice system. and usage.3 The evidence shows that criminalisation The evidence is mounting that these consequences of cannabis has had no significant statistical impact have greater detrimental impacts than those from on reducing use, nor is there any evidence that cannabis use itself. The criminalisation approach decriminalisation increases use.4, 5, 6, 7 The health also ties up criminal justice resources that could risks listed above are still prevalent with or without be more effectively directed elsewhere. -
Download Download
New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 45(1): 14-30 Minor parties, ER policy and the 2020 election JULIENNE MOLINEAUX* and PETER SKILLING** Abstract Since New Zealand adopted the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) representation electoral system in 1996, neither of the major parties has been able to form a government without the support of one or more minor parties. Understanding the ways in which Employment Relations (ER) policy might develop after the election, thus, requires an exploration of the role of the minor parties likely to return to parliament. In this article, we offer a summary of the policy positions and priorities of the three minor parties currently in parliament (the ACT, Green and New Zealand First parties) as well as those of the Māori Party. We place this summary within a discussion of the current volatile political environment to speculate on the degree of power that these parties might have in possible governing arrangements and, therefore, on possible changes to ER regulation in the next parliamentary term. Keywords: Elections, policy, minor parties, employment relations, New Zealand politics Introduction General elections in New Zealand have been held under the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) system since 1996. Under this system, parties’ share of seats in parliament broadly reflects the proportion of votes that they received, with the caveat that parties need to receive at least five per cent of the party vote or win an electorate seat in order to enter parliament. The change to the MMP system grew out of increasing public dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the previous First Past the Post (FPP) or ‘winner-take-all’ system (NZ History, 2014). -
New Zealand's Green Party and Foreign Troop Deployments: Views, Values and Impacts
New Zealand's Green Party and Foreign Troop Deployments: Views, Values and Impacts By Simon Beuse A Thesis Submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations Victoria University of Wellington 2010 Content List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 2 New Zealand‘s Foreign Affairs .......................................................................................... 9 2.1 Public Perceptions ....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 History ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Key Relationships ...................................................................................................... 11 2.4 The Nuclear Issue ...................................................................................................... 12 2.5 South Pacific .............................................................................................................. 14 2.6 Help in Numbers: The United Nations ...................................................................... 15 2.7 Defence Reform 2000 -
Response Form
Response Form In response to Request for Proposals by: Ministry of Social Development for: The Generator ref: 17.113.01 Date of this Proposal: 01.03.2018 1. About the Respondent Our profile This is a Consortium Proposal, by WellbeingNZ and McGuinness Institute Limited (together the Respondents) to supply the Requirements. Item Detail Trading name: McGuinness Institute Limited Full legal name (if McGuinness Institute Limited different): Physical address: Level 2, 5 Cable Street, Wellington, New Zealand, 6011 Postal address: PO Box 24222, Manners Street, Wellington, New Zealand, 6142 Registered office: Level 2, 5 Cable St, Wellington, New Zealand Business website: http://www.mcguinnessinstitute.org/ / www.wellbeingnz.net Type of entity (legal status): NZ Limited Company Registration number: Company number: 1538950 NZ Business Number: 9429035262381 Charities Registration Number: CC21440 Country of residence: New Zealand GST registration number: 089-169-003 Our Point of Contact Item Detail Contact person: Wendy McGuinness Position: Chief Executive Phone number: 04 499 8888 Mobile number: +64 21 781 200 Email address: [email protected] Page 2 of 36 2. Response to the Requirements Pre-condition # Pre-condition Meets We are looking for one organisation, consortium or collective to manage The 1. Yes Generator across New Zealand. We are not intending to break this up into small contracts. Is your organisation, consortium or collective willing and capable to host and manage The Generator as a New Zealand-wide initiative? Overview of our solution We have created a consortium that is national in its approach; its members stretch from the Far North to Christchurch. Consortium members in local government will operate throughout New Zealand and accounting offices for the Consortium (BDO) are regional, with 16 locations throughout the country.