DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H3322

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—House H3322 H3322 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE June 30, 2021 our Nation’s roads, bridges, rails, and ten from fossil fuels over the course of derlying bill to prohibit using transit water systems, while keeping in mind the last decades and century. funds for artwork and nonfunctional the urgency to fight climate change. But now is the time to change and landscaping. I do not hear from my colleagues prepare for that change—not mind- AMENDMENT OFFERED BY MR. DESAULNIER across the aisle language that speaks lessly. This isn’t a radical proposal. Mr. DESAULNIER. Madam Speaker, I to the future; I hear language instead This is about preparing for the future. have an amendment at the desk. that clings to the past. On this side of In terms of the infrastructure that The SPEAKER pro tempore. The the aisle, we speak about a transition gets those new alternative fuels, hydro- Clerk will report the amendment. to a cleaner, more green future. gen fuel cell cars, battery electric cars, The Clerk read as follows: Madam Speaker, I urge my col- in California, we have acknowledged At the end of the resolution, add the fol- leagues to vote ‘‘yes’’ and invest in our that we need to get these cars to be lowing: communities. available to everyone, including people SEC. 6. Notwithstanding any other provi- Mr. RESCHENTHALER. Madam from disadvantaged communities. That sion of this resolution or House Resolution Speaker, I yield myself the balance of is why we have changed the tax code to 504, the amendment specified in section 7 my time. make it easier for everyone to get an shall be in order as though printed as the last amendment in House Report 117–75 is of- Madam Speaker, once again, Demo- alternative fuel car, not just wealthy fered by Representative Slotkin or a des- crats are bringing a hyperpartisan bill people, and get the benefits of that. ignee. That amendment shall be debatable to the floor. They are blocking Repub- I want to read a quote from Forbes for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled lican efforts to actually improve meas- magazine about infrastructure and by the proponent and an opponent. ures for the Americans who don’t make electric cars: ‘‘These vehicles use a dif- SEC. 7. The amendment referred to in sec- $100,000 a year, who can’t afford a ferent kind of fuel and plug into our tion 6 is as follows: Tesla. electricity system, and the good news Page 722, strike lines 1 through 5 (and re- This is not me saying that. You can about that is there are a number of designate accordingly). look at the numbers. You can follow cost-benefit studies,’’ numerous ones, The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gen- the money. ‘‘that are showing this can be really tleman from California is recognized. Let’s just look at the numbers. In beneficial to all ratepayers, not just The material previously referred to 2015, when House Republicans were in the drivers of the vehicles.’’ by Mr. RESCHENTHALER is as follows: charge and had another package that The critical mass of changing helps At the end of the resolution, add the fol- was an infrastructure package, 30 per- everybody. It brings down the cost of lowing: cent of the amendments were Demo- energy. So, for those rising costs at the SEC. 6. Immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the House shall proceed to the crat amendments. This time, only 18 pump, there is a bend in the arc that consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. percent of the amendments are Repub- will come sooner rather than later that 751) to prohibit a moratorium on the use of lican amendments. Clearly, this is far will help everyone, as opposed to the hydraulic fracturing. All points of order from a bipartisan bill. opinions by my colleague and some of against consideration of the bill are waived. Follow the money. It is no surprise his other speakers today. The bill shall be considered as read. All that, under this bill, congressional dis- Matt Stanberry, the managing direc- points of order against provisions in the bill tricts in blue States would get almost tor for the advanced transportation are waived. The previous question shall be double the funding for transportation program at the trade group Advanced considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without projects compared to districts in red Energy Economy, says: ‘‘As you in- intervening motion except: (1) one hour of States. crease electricity sales for charging debate equally divided and controlled by the Madam Speaker, while liberals and the vehicles, it has the effect of driving chair and ranking minority member of the progressives push the Green New Deal down rates for all ratepayers because it Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one fantasy on Americans, and while we do spreads the fixed cost of the system out motion to recommit. things like define art as infrastructure, across a larger volume of sales.’’ SEC. 7. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not House Republicans will continue to Madam Speaker, this is about pre- apply to the consideration of H.R. 751. fight for investment in roads, bridges, paring for this new energy future. Who- Mr. DESAULNIER. Madam Speaker, I and real transportation that will help ever gets there first, as a country, as yield back the balance of my time, and real Americans and drive our economy. always in our history, has a predomi- I move the previous question on the Madam Speaker, I urge my col- nant role in foreign affairs and the amendment and the resolution. leagues to vote ‘‘no’’ on the previous leadership on this globe. The Chinese The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question and vote ‘‘no’’ on the rule, and are trying to beat us to that. We can’t question is on ordering the previous I yield back the balance of my time. let that happen. We talk about global question on the resolution and the Mr. DESAULNIER. Madam Speaker, I competitiveness. We need to get the in- amendment thereto. yield myself the balance of my time. frastructure in. Yes, they need to do a The question was taken; and the I want to thank my friend and col- better job at reducing pollution, tradi- Speaker pro tempore announced that league from Pennsylvania. I do appre- tional pollutants and carbon. the noes appeared to have it. ciate his comments about my personal The Clean Air Act, originally signed Mr. DESAULNIER. Madam Speaker, health and also his collegiality. by Richard Nixon, and then changed on that I demand the yeas and nays. His comments about being bipar- and amended by Ronald Reagan, two The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- tisan, I completely agree with. But Republicans, and the waiver that, un- ant to section 3(s) of House Resolution compromise requires, from my perspec- fortunately, previous administrations 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. tive—and granted, we do have a dif- gave to California through multiple Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, fur- ferent perspective about how we get generations, have fueled, pardon the ther proceedings on this question are there and who is giving and how much expression, the benefits we have gotten postponed. is given. in public health and traditional pollut- f I really think this bill is an incred- ants. It is fueling today the States that b 1345 ibly important bill for the future of join California, like Colorado, which America and American workers and in- are pushing this innovation. ESTABLISHING THE SELECT COM- novation. Madam Speaker, this is about the fu- MITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE As far as changing to renewables and ture of America and America’s excel- JANUARY 6TH ATTACK ON THE alternatives, that electrical system has lence and its energy independence and UNITED STATES CAPITOL to be upgraded. We have seen what has its workforce, staying at home and pro- Mr. MCGOVERN. Madam Speaker, happened because of climate change in viding for this energy independence for pursuant to House Resolution 504, I the Gulf. We see the struggles we have future generations. call up the resolution (H. Res. 503) es- on the West Coast with fires, all be- Madam Speaker, in a moment, I will tablishing the Select Committee to In- cause, as evidence-based research tells offer an amendment to the rule to vestigate the January 6th Attack on us, what we have done with the envi- make in order the amendment offered the United States Capitol, and ask for ronment and the benefits we have got- by Ms. SLOTKIN, which amends the un- its immediate consideration. VerDate Sep 11 2014 08:42 Jul 01, 2021 Jkt 019060 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 0636 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K30JN7.022 H30JNPT1 ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with HOUSE June 30, 2021 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3323 The Clerk read the title of the resolu- ligence information regarding planned branches and other instrumentalities of gov- tion. events for January 6, 2021.’’; and ernment; The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- Whereas the security leadership of the (B) influencing factors that contributed to ant to House Resolution 504, the resolu- Congress under-prepared for the events of the domestic terrorist attack on the Capitol and how technology, including online plat- tion is considered read. January 6th, with United States Capitol Po- lice Inspector General Michael Bolton testi- forms, financing, and malign foreign influ- The text of the resolution is as fol- ence operations and campaigns may have lows: fying again on June 15, 2021, that— (1) ‘‘USCP did not have adequate policies factored into the motivation, organization, H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Letters List 2017-2019
    R Sen. Maria Cantwell Office Depot Sales of Possibly Unnecessary 11/17/16 1/30/ 17 Computer Repair Products T Sen. Bill Nelson SES Bonuses 11/17/16 1/24/17 V Sen. Bill Nelson Out of Network Hospital Costs 12/1/16 1/31/17 X Sens. Mike Lee, Amy Seed Mergers 12/14/16 1/30/ 17 Klobuchar y Rep. Peter Welch Visa / EMV 12/14/16 1/31/17 z Sens. Cory Booker, Robert FieldTurf 12/16/16 1/24/17 Menendez vu Sens. Mike Lee, Ron Johnson FTC Actions 12/21/16 1/23/17 CONGRESSIONAL LETTERS 2017: VOLUME 1 l(b)( ?)(A) I Member: Subject ~sponded 1 Sen. Mike Lee Non Public Briefing onl 7 1/4/2017 1/5/17 Qualcomm, & Questcor 2 Reps. Eliot Engel, Tony Fur Labeling 1/9/2017 2/16/17 Cardenas, Paul Tonka, Earl Blumenauer, Steve Cohen, Donald Beyer Jr., Mike Quigley, Leonard Lance, Nita Lowey, Anna Eshoo, & Jerry McNerney 3 Sen. Ted Cruz Seed Mergers 1/11/17 1/31/17 4 Sen. Mike Lee Non Public Briefing on Quincy 1/17/17 1/25/17 Biosciences 5 Sens. Susan Collins and Robert Invitation to testify re Senior Scams 1/23/17 Casey Jr. (Senate Aging Committee) 6 Sen. Cory Booker Walgreens / RiteAid Merger 2/2/17 2/21 /17 7 Sen. Bill Nelson Fiat Chrysler 1/31/17 3/15/17 8 Rep. Steve Chabot Invitation to testify re Small Business 2/16/17 Cybersecurity (House Small Business Committee) 9 Sen. Jon Tester Vizio 3/3/17 3/21/17 10 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatens America
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 24, 2021 No. 90 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 25, 2021, at 12 p.m. Senate MONDAY, MAY 24, 2021 The Senate met at 3 p.m. and was Mr. MCCONNELL. Madam President, NOMINATION OF KRISTEN M. called to order by the President pro I ask unanimous consent that the order CLARKE tempore (Mr. LEAHY). for the quorum call be rescinded. Mr. MCCONNELL. On a completely f The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. different matter, when President HIRONO). Without objection, it is so or- Biden’s nominees have been qualified PRAYER dered. and mainstream, they received bipar- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- f tisan cooperation. But the President’s fered the following prayer: RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY choice to head a key Division at the Let us pray. LEADER Department of Justice as an Assistant Eternal God, You place melodies in Attorney General failed to even ad- our hearts. Thank You for the music of The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Re- vance out of the committee. Your mercies, for the harmonies of publican leader is recognized. The Democratic leader had to reach Your sacred words, and for the sym- f into the Judiciary Committee and res- phonies of Your unfailing love. May NATIONAL GUARD cue the nomination of Kristen Clarke. Our colleagues on the committee did Your songs that surround us in the spa- Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Amy Coney Barrett
    Post-Hearing Analysis: Amy Coney Barrett Introduction After President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, Alliance for Justice issued our report. Reviewing her record, it was clear that if Barrett is confirmed, the American people will suffer grave harm. Millions will lose their health insurance. The clock will be turned back on critical rights and legal protections. Her record overwhelmingly demonstrates that she would be an extreme member of the Court and would implement the dangerous agenda of President Trump and the Republican Party. This week, Amy Coney Barrett’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee only confirmed and reinforced our prior conclusions. When pressed regarding Trump’s litmus tests — and her own record — she was evasive, misleading, and even contemptuous. She was visibly annoyed that senators had the gall to probe her record and views. She chastised senators for asking questions she decided she would not answer. She failed to turn over key documents to the Senate.. She famously held up a blank notepad, proudly displaying she had taken no notes; an apt metaphor for how she went out of her way not to address the very real concerns and fears millions of people have with her nomination. Republican senators spent the hearings trying to downplay the stakes and pretend that they were only interested in judges who will neutrally and without bias apply the law. Ted Cruz once asked a previous Trump nominee — who he later forced to withdraw — what that judge had ever done to advance the conservative cause. Yet, over days of hearing, Republicans tried to pretend they weren’t pushing an agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus June 2019 Dem Primary
    Democratic Dividing Lines Verified Voter Omnibus Survey N=484 Democrats or Democratic leaners June 22 - June 25, 2019 !X!1 Key Findings • Biden’s lead among 24 announced Democratic candidates has narrowed by 6-points since May to 32% of the Democratic vote. • Biden’s 6-point drop came with a concurrent 6-point gain by Elizabeth Warren to 11% of the Democratic vote, or 4- points behind Bernie Sanders who takes 15% of the Democratic vote. • Biden continues to lead both Sanders and Warren in head to head match-ups, but his lead has narrowed to 30-points from both Sanders and Warren, down from 36-points ahead of Sanders and 47-points ahead of Warren in May. • 73% of Democrats plan to watch the debates, or coverage of the debates. Ahead of the kickoff of tonight’s debates, we tested Democratic concern about two recent pieces of news about Biden — his flip flopping on the Hyde Amendment’s impact on access to abortion, and past associations with segregationists. • We found the Hyde Amendment resonates more strongly with Democratic voters, with 39% of Democrats concerned about Biden’s stance on the Hyde Amendment, and 22% concerned about his associations with segregationists. • Particularly concerned are women, African Americans, younger voters, and more educated voters. !2 Methodology • Using a voter file-matched online panel, we surveyed n=1,006 registered voters across the country from June 22 to June 25, 2019, with a sample of 484 Democrats or Democratic-leaning Independents. • With our third monthly tracking survey of 2019, we were able to confirm the voting history of participants and track changes in the attitudes and behaviors of key 2020 voters since our last survey of verified Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent voters from May 20 to May 21, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouth University Poll NEW HAMPSHIRE: DEM PRIMARY IN
    Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Released: Contact: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office) [email protected] Follow on Twitter: @PollsterPatrick NEW HAMPSHIRE: DEM PRIMARY IN FLUX Many see no need to choose between electability and issue alignment West Long Branch, NJ – Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren has joined former Vice President Joe Biden at the front of the pack in New Hampshire, according to the latest Monmouth University Poll. She has taken support from both Biden and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders since Monmouth’s first poll of the state’s Democratic contest this past spring. The poll also finds that most primary voters say they prioritize electability over issue alignment, but seem to feel they are not actually forced to make that choice when it comes down to it. Among registered New Hampshire Democrats and unaffiliated voters who are likely to participate in the February 2020 Democratic primary, 27% currently support Warren and 25% support Biden. The only other candidates in double digits are Sanders at 12% and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg at 10%. Others with measurable support are California Sen. Kamala Harris (3%), New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker (2%), Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (2%), Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar (2%), former hedge fund manager Tom Steyer (2%), and entrepreneur Andrew Yang (2%). The remaining 10 candidates included in the poll earn 1% or less. Compared to Monmouth’s prior New Hampshire poll, which was in May, Warren’s support has grown by 19 points (from 8%) while Biden’s has dropped by 11 points (from 36%).
    [Show full text]
  • Scrutinizing Federal Electoral Qualifications
    Scrutinizing Federal Electoral Qualifications DEREK T. MULLER* Candidates for federal office must meet several constitutional qualifications. Sometimes, whether a candidate meets those qualifications is a matter of dispute. Courts and litigants often assume that a state has the power to include or exclude candidates from the ballot on the basis of the state’s own scrutiny of candidates’ qualifications. Courts and litigants also often assume that the matter is not left to the states but to Congress or another political actor. But those contradictory assumptions have never been examined, until now. This Article compiles the mandates of the Constitution, the precedents of Congress, the practices of states administering the ballot, and judicial precedents. It concludes that states have no role in evaluating the qualifications of congressional candidates—the matter is reserved to the people and to Congress. It then concludes that while states have the power to scrutinize qualifications for presidential candidates, they are not obligated to do so under the Constitution. If state legislatures choose to exercise that power, it comes at the risk of ceding reviewing power to election officials, partisan litigants, and the judiciary. The Article then offers a framework for future litigation that protects the guarantees of the Constitution, the rights of the voters, and the authorities of the sovereigns. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 560 I. CONSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H2574
    H2574 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE May 19, 2021 Sewell (DelBene) Wilson (FL) Young (Joyce NAYS—208 Ruppersberger Slotkin (Axne) Wilson (SC) Slotkin (Axne) (Hayes) (OH)) (Raskin) Waters (Timmons) Aderholt Gohmert Moolenaar Waters Wilson (SC) Rush (Barraga´ n) Young (Joyce Allen (Barraga´ n) (Timmons) Gonzales, Tony Mooney (Underwood) Wilson (FL) Amodei (OH)) Gonzalez (OH) Moore (AL) Sewell (DelBene) (Hayes) The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Armstrong Good (VA) Moore (UT) question is on the resolution. Arrington Gooden (TX) Mullin f Babin Gosar Murphy (NC) The question was taken; and the Bacon Granger Nehls NATIONAL COMMISSION TO INVES- Speaker pro tempore announced that Baird Graves (LA) Newhouse TIGATE THE JANUARY 6 ATTACK the ayes appeared to have it. Balderson Graves (MO) Norman Banks Green (TN) Nunes ON THE UNITED STATES CAP- Mr. RESCHENTHALER. Mr. Speak- Barr Greene (GA) Obernolte ITOL COMPLEX ACT Bentz Griffith er, on that I demand the yeas and nays. Owens Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi. Mr. Bergman Grothman Palazzo The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- Bice (OK) Guest Palmer Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution ant to section 3(s) of House Resolution Biggs Guthrie Pence 409, I call up the bill (H.R. 3233) to es- 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Bilirakis Hagedorn Perry tablish the National Commission to In- Bishop (NC) Harris Pfluger The vote was taken by electronic de- Boebert Harshbarger Posey vestigate the January 6 Attack on the vice, and there were—yeas 216, nays Bost Hartzler Reed United States Capitol Complex, and for 208, not voting 5, as follows: Brady Hern Reschenthaler other purposes, and ask for its imme- Brooks Herrell Rice (SC) diate consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocasio-Cortez Describes Fascist Assault on January 6: “It Was an All-Out Attempted Coup”
    افغانستان آزاد – آزاد افغانستان AA-AA چو کشور نباشـد تن من مبـــــــاد بدين بوم و بر زنده يک تن مــــباد همه سر به سر تن به کشتن دهيم از آن به که کشور به دشمن دهيم www.afgazad.com [email protected] زبانهای اروپائی European Languages Jacob Crosse 24.05.2021 Ocasio-Cortez describes fascist assault on January 6: “It was an all-out attempted coup” In a newly released interview with Maria Hinojosa of Latino USA, New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stated that the fascist assault on the US Capitol on January 6, directed by then-President Donald Trump, was “an all-out attempted coup.” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (center), Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020 [Credit: AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin] Pushing back against the narrative espoused by Trump, the majority of the Republican Party, their far-right and neo-Nazi allies, and a not insignificant layer of the pseudo-left, Ocasio-Cortez explained that her characterization was not “some sort of exaggeration.” She noted that former Vice President Mike Pence “was taken out of the Senate chamber www.afgazad.com 1 [email protected] something like 60 seconds before these terrorist insurrectionists got into the Senate chamber. 60 seconds.” Explaining the pivotal role of Pence as president of the Senate, Ocasio-Cortez stated that Pence was “the one person, arguably, that had one of the most important roles in making sure that procedurally the Electoral College counts went on as proceeded.” The former vice president drew the ire of Trump after he resisted repeated demands from the would-be dictator that he unconstitutionally overthrow the election during the January 6 formal counting of the previously certified Electoral College votes.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
    OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/08/2016 Source: State Elections Offices* SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE ELECTORAL ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR VOTES JOSEPH R. BIDEN (D) DONALD J. TRUMP (R) AL 9 9 AK 3 3 AZ 11 11 AR 6 6 CA 55 55 CO 9 9 CT 7 7 DE 3 3 DC 3 3 FL 29 29 GA 16 16 HI 4 4 ID 4 4 IL 20 20 IN 11 11 IA 6 6 KS 6 6 KY 8 8 LA 8 8 ME 4 3 1 MD 10 10 MA 11 11 MI 16 16 MN 10 10 MS 6 6 MO 10 10 MT 3 3 NE 5 1 4 NV 6 6 NH 4 4 NJ 14 14 NM 5 5 NY 29 29 NC 15 15 ND 3 3 OH 18 18 OK 7 7 OR 7 7 PA 20 20 RI 4 4 SC 9 9 SD 3 3 TN 11 11 TX 38 38 UT 6 6 VT 3 3 VA 13 13 WA 12 12 WV 5 5 WI 10 10 WY 3 3 Total: 538 306 232 Total Electoral Votes Needed to Win = 270 - Page 1 of 12 - OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE BIDEN BLANKENSHIP BODDIE CARROLL CHARLES AL 849,624 AK 153,778 1,127 AZ 1,672,143 13 AR 423,932 2,108 1,713 CA 11,110,250 2,605 559 CO 1,804,352 5,061 2,515 2,011 CT 1,080,831 219 11 DE 296,268 1 87 8 DC 317,323 FL 5,297,045 3,902 854 GA 2,473,633 61 8 701 65 HI 366,130 931 ID 287,021 1,886 163 IL 3,471,915 18 9,548 75 IN 1,242,416 895 IA 759,061 1,707 KS 570,323 KY 772,474 7 408 43 LA 856,034 860 1,125 2,497 ME 435,072 MD 1,985,023 4 795 30 MA 2,382,202 MI 2,804,040 7,235 963 MN 1,717,077 75 1,037 112 MS 539,398 1,279 1,161 MO 1,253,014 3,919 664 MT 244,786 23 NE 374,583 NV 703,486 3,138 NH 424,937
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus October 2019 Dem Primary
    Democratic Primary Update Verified Voter Omnibus Survey N=449 Democratic or Democratic Leaning Likely Primary Voters October 21 - October 25, 2019 X1 Key Findings • Joe Biden continues to lead the field of 19 Democratic Presidential candidates tested, receiving 32 percent support among likely Democratic primary voters, or about consistent with his 30 percent support among Democratic voters in August. • Biden runs 10 points ahead of Elizabeth Warren, and Biden leads by 6 among likely Democratic primary voters who with a verified history of voting in primary elections. • Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris each saw declines in support since August, with Sanders receiving 15 percent of the vote share from 19 percent in August, and Harris dropping to 5 percent, from 11 percent in August. • This puts Harris on even footing with Pete Buttigieg, who secured the support of 6 percent of likely Democratic voters, up 3 points from August. • Movement in head to head match-ups against Biden reflect recent shifts in support. In August, Biden held a 20 point advantage against Warren in a head to head match-up. Today, Biden’s lead against Warren narrowed to 11 points. • Conversely, Biden’s advantage in head to head match-ups against both Sanders and Harris widened since August. • In August, Biden led Sanders by 20 points; today, Biden leads Sanders by 31 points. • In August, Biden led Harris by 24 points; today, Biden leads Harris by 37 points. 2 Methodology • Using a voter file-matched online panel, we surveyed n=1,002 registered voters across the country from October 21 to October 25, 2019, with a sample of 449 Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent Likely Voters.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the January 6 Commission
    STARTING THE CONVERSATION ON THE PROPOSED JANUARY 6 COMMISSION Use this guide to kick off and guide a pro-democracy conversation about the January 6 Commission. You can find more Conversation Starters and get tips on initiating pro-democracy conversations here. The Background The attack on the U.S. Capital on January 6, 2021 left Americans in shock and full of questions. Many wanted to understand what went wrong and how the country could be better prepared to prevent similar events in the future. After significant events like this one, there is often a call to form a Congressional commission to investigate the incident. A Congressional commission is a group that is created to formally look into a particular event or problem, and publish findings and recommendations that advise Congress. While the information they obtain during this process can be extremely valuable, these commissions aren’t without issues and they can be challenging to get off the ground. The success of a commission comes down to how the commission members endorse the final findings, and how many of the proposed recommendations are implemented. Partisanship often comes into play as parties determine the makeup of the panel and scope of the commission. The results can leave one or both sides unsatisfied depending on whether the recommended actions had their intended effect or if those responsible were held accountable for their actions. One of the most well-known commissions is The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United State or the 9/11 Commission. The commission appointees were split evenly between Democrats and Republicans, and all ten members endorsed the report and the majority of the recommendations were passed into law.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Nuclear Weapons Obsolete and Destabilizing
    The WA S H I N G T O N washingtonspectator.org MAY/JUNE 2021 vol. 47, no. 3 issn 0887-428x SPECTATOR © 2021 The Public Concern Foundation washingtonspectator.org activity within the military, would have been a central focus Military Veterans, the of any investigation, and is already a priority for the Defense Department. Republican Party, and But if the commission had been limited to the events of Janu- ary 6, it would have missed much of the point. The biggest risk January 6—a New here is not that we fail to understand what happened in the past and breathe a sigh of relief that American democracy dodged a Chapter in the Story bullet. It’s that we don’t recognize what some have called a pro- cess of “ongoing incitement.” The main significance of January By George Black 6 is that it failed. But failure is a learning experience, and those who propelled the insurrection are determined not to fail again. n an April 27 article for THE WASHINGTON SPECTA- In that sense, the storming of the Capitol was not a culmination: tor, “All Enemies Foreign and Domestic,” I set out to trace it was one event in a sequence, even a dress rehearsal, just as the I the enduring influence of conspiracy theories that took invasion of the Michigan State Capitol by armed militants last root among military officers April can be seen as a dry on the far right after the run for January 6. disaster in Vietnam, then When Republicans in morphed into present-day Congress twice opposed extremist and paramilitary the impeachment of movements, and inspired Donald Trump, they gave many of those who led the reasons that were at least failed Capitol insurrection superficially plausible.
    [Show full text]