Student Teachers' Knowledge and Understanding
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wits Institutional Repository on DSPACE STUDENT TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF ALGEBRAIC CONCEPTS: THE CASE OF COLLEGES OF EDUCATION IN THE EASTERN CAPE AND SOUTHERN KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA BY CHRISTIAN MENSAH OSEI A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION (MATHEMATICS) OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND, JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: PROF. P.E. LARIDON 0 ABSTRACT This study is aimed at investigating the knowledge and understanding of algebra amongst final year College of Education students in and around Transkei region of Eastern cape, South Africa. Triangulation methods were used to gather data for the study, which included an algebra test instrument, adapted from the CDMTA and Kaur and Sharon (1994) test instruments, interviews and classroom observations. Six Colleges of Education with a total number of 212 students constituted the sample from the Eastern Cape province and South KwaZulu Natal. Data were collected from August 1997 to July 1998. The motivation for the study was that such an exploratory investigation could contribute significantly to the understanding of some of the principal reasons underlying the poor results in the final schooling examination (the “matric”) of the teaching and learning of mathematics in rural areas of South Africa. Algebra forms a big proportion of the final matric examination in mathematics. The overall results of the study indicate that the conceptual algebraic knowledge and understanding of these College students is weak and fragile. In analysing the algebraic knowledge and understanding of students as evidenced by the data, factors such as language, the nature of mathematics, the philosophy underpinning teaching and learning and textbooks were seen to have played important roles in the conceptions and misconceptions which many of the subjects of the study portrayed. My research clearly shows that College of Education students have misconceptions, poor learning and teaching of algebraic concepts. This suggests that these prospective teachers do not have well developed concepts in algebra. The participants’ knowledge and understanding of algebraic concepts are therefore not good enough to assist learners as far as learning for conceptual understanding is concerned at schools. The results show that much of the knowledge and understanding of algebra came from previous knowledge and understanding gained during high school. Little change had happened during the years spent at the Colleges. The conceptions and misconceptions arose out of the traditional framework of knowledge acquisition rather than through approaches advocated by the newly implemented South African curriculum (Curriculum 2005), which has been revised to a National Curriculum Statement similar to what NCTM (1991) Standards might have envisaged. The lack of pedagogical content knowledge in algebra, shown by these student teachers during their teaching practice lessons reflects a deeper problem pertaining to 1 their future teaching after completion of the courses at Colleges. This is bound to have a cascading effect on teaching and learning in schools, perpetuating the cycle of misconceptions in algebra shown by this study, unless something radical is done about the teaching and learning of algebra at Colleges. The study concludes with recommendations arising out of the results and a number of suggestions for education departments, curriculum implementers, lecturers and future researchers. Strategies are suggested for improving the existing poor state of affairs in the learning and teaching of algebra at Colleges of Education and at secondary schools. These include improvement in algebraic competencies like multiple representations; understanding of basic principles such as: one cannot add unlike terms, checking solutions of equations and inequations. Real life examples should be used to give meaning to the algebraic concept they want to teach where possible. College of Education lecturers should place emphasis on conceptual understanding and correct usage of algebraic notations and symbols. Curriculum developers should include history and relevance of certain algebraic topics in order to create interest and meaning for some of the concepts. Instructional materials in school algebra should be designed specifically for local contexts. Researchers should investigate the cause of misconceptions and misunderstandings of algebraic concepts at high schools and try to address them before they are carried through to the College of Education level. DECLARATION 2 I declare that this thesis is my own unaided work. It is submitted for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any other degree or examination in any other University. ……………………………………………………………. ……………day of………………………………………… 3 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my late Father, Opayin Kwadwo Nsoah, may his soul rest in perfect peace. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank my supervisor Professor P.E. Laridon for his assistance and support throughout this study. Without his guidance this study would never have reached completion. The study would not have been possible without the permission of the six Colleges of Education and without the cooperation of the lecturers of these institutions. I am especially grateful to the participants from these Colleges for their cooperation. Finally, I would like to thank my family especially my wife Sylvia Nomalinge Osei who has been the source of substantial support and encouragement during the study. To Mr K. Adom-Aboagye and Mr M. C. Snell who helped in proof-reading the drafts before the final presentation to University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; Miss Eleanor Tembo for allowing me access to her internet facility; Mr George Kofi Doe and Mr Baffour Awua-Nsiah for helping me in the use of the computer for the wordprocessing of the study. 5 CONTENTS ABSTRACT i DECLARATION iii DEDICATION IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v CONTENTS VI ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS XII LIST OF GRAPHS XIII LIST OF FIGURES XIV LIST OF TABLES XV DATA REFERENCES CODES XVI CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCING THE STUDY 1 1.1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1.1 Historical Knowledge Mathematics 1 1.2. ALGEBRA 3 1.3 ALGEBRA IN SOUTH AFRICAN SCHOOLS 5 1.3.1 Background of OBE and Curriculum 2005 8 6 1.3.2 Reform in mathematics education 9 1.4. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 10 1.5. MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY 12 1.6. RESEARCH FOCUS 20 1.7. RESEARCH QUESTIONS 20 1.8. PROBLEMS AND LIMITATIONS 20 1.9. OUTLINE OF THE STUDY 21 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 23 2.1. METHOD OF TEACHING ALGEBRA 23 2.1.1. Mathematics as a body of knowledge 23 2.1.2. The traditional Method of Teaching Algebra 24 2.1.3. Learner-centred Education 26 2.1.4. Philosophies of Mathematics 28 2.1.4.1. Logicism 29 2.1.4.2. Formalism 29 2.1.4.3. Platonism 29 2.1.4.4. Fallibilism 30 2.1.4.5. Intuitionism 30 2.1.5 Constructivism 31 2.1.5.1. An Introduction to Constructivism 31 2.1.5.2. Mediation 37 7 2.1.5.3. Constructivism and Fallibilism 39 2.1.5.4. Language and Thought 41 2.1.6. The Investigative Approach 46 2.1.7. Summary 47 2.2. DIFFICULTIES IN THE LEARNING OF ALGEBRA 49 2.2.1. Research on specific difficulties 49 2.2.2. General obstacles in learning algebra 50 2.2.3. Obstacles of an Epistemological nature 51 2.2.4. The obstacles induced by instruction 51 2.2.5. Obstacles associated with learner’s accommodation process 52 2.3. PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE 53 2.3.1. Knowledge about mathematics in culture and society 55 2.3.2. Disposition towards mathematics 55 2.4. PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ SUBJECT-MATTER KNOWLEDGE 56 2.5. MISCONCEPTIONS 57 2.6. CAUSES OF MISCONCEPTIONS AND OTHER COGNITIVE PROBLEMS 58 2.6.1. Misconceptions perpetuated by mathematics teachers 60 2.7. TEACHING 60 2.7.1. Transmission teaching 62 2.7.2. Integrated Teaching 63 8 2.8. THE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM AND UNDERSTANDING 64 2.9. PROCEDURAL AND CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING 66 2.10. CONCLUSION 67 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND PILOT 71 3.1. METHOD 71 3.1.1. Introduction 71 3.1.1.1 Triangulation 72 3.1.2. Methodology 73 3.1.2.1. Research design 73 3.1.2.2. Subjects 75 3.1.2.3. Access and acceptance to Colleges of Education, lecturers and students 76 3.1.2.4. Access to statistical information 77 3.1.2.5. Academic Background 77 3.1.3. Instrumentation 78 3.1.3.1. Rationale 78 3.1.3.2. Algebra test 78 3.1.3.2.1. CDMTA test 78 3.1.3.2.2. Kaur and Sharon test 79 3.1.3.2.3. Explanation of choice of questions from CDTMA 80 3.1.3.2.4. Explanation of choice of questions from Kaur and Sharon (1994) test 81 9 3.1.3.3. Interview 81 3.1.3.4. Observation 83 3.1.4. Procedure 83 3.1.5. Scoring 84 3.2. THE PILOT STUDY 84 3.2.1. Design of the study 84 3.2.1.1. Data collection 84 3.2.1.2. Pilot Interview 86 3.2.1.2.1. Pilot interview format 86 3.2.1.3. Classroom Observation 87 3.2.1.4. Field Notes 87 3.2.2. Analysis and Results of Data from Pilot Study 88 3.2.2.1. Algebra Test Analysis 88 3.2.2.2. Interview Analysis 92 3.2.2.3 Classroom observation 93 3.3. COLLECTION OF DATA FOR FINAL STUDY 94 3.3.1. Sample for Test 94 3.3.2. Sample for Interviews 95 3.3.3. Sample for Observation 95 3.4. VALIDITY 95 CHAPTER 4: ANALYSIS OF DATA AND PRELIMINARY DICUSSIONS 97 10 4.1.