Progressive Collapse Assessment of Multistory Irregular Reinforced Concrete Framed Structures Under Gravity Loads
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
13TH ARAB STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE UNIVERSITY OF BLIDA 1 DECEMBER 13-15, 2015 ALGERIA Progressive Collapse Assessment of Multistory Irregular Reinforced Concrete Framed Structures Under Gravity Loads Mohamed El-Bayomy* and Hamed Salem** *Assistant Lecturer, Structural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University [email protected] ** Prof. of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University [email protected] Abstract: Progressive collapse is a disastrous partial or total collapse which causes a massive number of causalities and injuries. It mainly occurs when a structure loses one or more of its main vertical carrying members such as columns or walls. In this research, the effect of plan structural irregularity on progressive collapse resistance was studied on multistory reinforced concrete framed structure subjected to gravity loads. The studied structure was designed according to the ‘Egyptian code of practice’ (ECP)[1] and the limits of elements' rotation were adopted from the ‘Unified Facilities Criteria’ (UFC)[2] guidelines. All the studied cases satisfied the UFC guidelines requirements for progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete structures. Key words: Progressive Collapse, Irregularity, Catenary action, UFC, AEM, ELS 1. INTRODUCTION Progressive collapse recently became an important point of research due to its catastrophic effect. In 1968, ‘Ronan Point apartment’, a 22-story building experienced partial collapse due to a gas explosion in the eighteenth floor which caused failure to corner load bearing walls[3]. In 1973, ‘Skyline Towers’, a 26-story building in Virginia, collapsed due to early shoring removal from an upper floor[3]. In 2013, ‘Savar building’, an eight-story building in Bangladesh, collapsed after appearance of several cracks in the columns of the ground floor[3]. The building was designed as an office building while it was used as a factory. The effect of machines weights and vibrations has caused the structure collapse. The aim of this research is to assess the effect of column sudden loss in a multistory irregular reinforced concrete framed structure under gravity loads, designed according to the Egyptian code of practice (ECP)[1], on progressive collapse according to the UFC guidelines[2]. Multiple cases of plan irregularity were studied with multiple column removal locations in each case. In the current study, a ten-story structure was modeled with slab and beam system. The Applied Element Method is used in this study with a fully nonlinear dynamic analysis scheme. The AEM is based on discrete crack approach which is capable of tracking the actual behavior of structure up to total collapse. The software used in analysis is ‘Extreme Loading for Structures’ (ELS)[4]. THE 13TH ARAB STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2. THE APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD (AEM) The AEM is based on dividing the structure virtually into small elements. Each two adjacent elements are connected together at certain contact points which are distributed around the elements' surfaces. Each contact point is represented by one normal and two shear springs, these springs represent the stresses and deformations of a certain volume. The AEM is based on discrete crack approach. This method can track the structural behavior passing through all stages of loading; elastic stage, crack initiation, element separation, partial collapse of structure, and collision with the ground and other structures. The software used in the analysis is ‘Extreme Loading for Structures’ (ELS) which is an analytical tool which uses the Applied Element Method (AEM). The ELS uses an implicit method in numerical integration, which models structural collapse better than explicit solver software. The material models used in ELS are shown in Figure 1[5] and Figure 2[6]. Maekawa compression model is used for concrete modeling under compression as shown in Figure 1-a. For concrete shear springs, linear relation between shear stress and shear strain is assumed until cracking of concrete, then the shear stresses drop suddenly as shown in Figure 1-b. The level of drop depends on aggregate interlocking and friction at crack surface. For reinforcement springs, Figure 2 shows the model, presented by Ristic et al.[6], used in ELS. Several factors affect the calculation of tangent stiffness of reinforcement in this model such as: the strain from reinforcement spring, loading status (loading or unloading), and history of steel spring (which controls Baushinger's effect). ELS was proved to be capable of performing nonlinear, static and dynamic, analysis of structures subjected to extreme cases of loading through elastic and inelastic stages up to structural collapse including automatic detection of cracks' locations, formation of plastic hinges, and buckling of elements. The ‘ELS’ software was extensively validated [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and had shown good agreement with real cases. Several validation cases including static, dynamic, and collapse cases were covered. Therefore, and since the goal of the current study is to assess the capability of multistory reinforced concrete framed structures to resist progressive collapse under gravity loads, it was decided that the AEM is the most suitable numerical tool for such assessment. (a) Concrete under axial force (b) Concrete undeer shear force Figure 1: Stresses in concrete springs due to relative displacement[5] Figure 2: Stresses in steel springs due to relative displacement[6] - 2 - THE 13TH ARAB STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 3. CASE STUDY The current study is an extension to the study by Helmy [21], where the progressive collapse of a regular reinforced concrete multi storey reinforced concrete structures was investigate. In the current study, effect of irregularity is investigated. 3.1 Details of Studied Structure The studied structure is a ten-story reinforced concrete residential building. The building consists of five bays in each direction, the typical span of each bay is five meters. The ground floor is a public area (uncontrolled area). The height of all stories is three meters. The structure is designed according to the Egyptian code for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures[1]. The Ultimate limits state design method was used for design of the structure members. All members were designed to resist both gravity loads and seismic loads. All columns were assumed fixed to the foundation. Figure 3 shows details of the master case of the studied structure. (b) Elevation of B1 and B2 (250X500) (c) Rft. details of B1 (d) Rft. details of B2 (a) Master case plan (All spans = 5m) Figure 3: Details of the master case of the studied structure 3.2 Earthquake Properties The design of the studied structure was checked against seismic loads using ACI318-08/IBC 2009[19][20] guidelines. The structure was assumed to be located in Cairo, Egypt (earthquake zone III according to the Egyptian code for loads). Therefore the peak ground acceleration was taken 0.15g and the response spectrum used is Type I. The importance factor of the building (γI) equals 1, the damping factor (η) equals 1, and the sub-soil group is assumed to be group (B). 3.3 Material Properties Nonlinear behavior of constituent materials are used in the models. The properties of concrete are shown in Table 1 and the properties of reinforcing steel are shown in Table 2. All the beams are assumed to be carrying masonry walls made of 25 cm width bricks, the density of bricks including plaster is assumed 1.8 t/m3. 3.4 Loads The loads considered in the analysis of all cases were as follows: The own weight of the structural members, the flooring load, the live load, and the masonry walls load. The flooring was assumed 0.15 t/m2 and the live load was assumed 0.3 t/m2. The load combination used in the study of column removal due to gravity loads was (1.2 D.L. + 0.5 L.L.) according to the UFC guidelines for nonlinear dynamic analysis of progressive collapse. The column in - 3 - THE 13TH ARAB STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE each case was removed at (t = 0.0 seconds) without affecting the beam-column connection in order not to affect the continuity of the horizontal members. Table 1: Concrete Properties Young's Modulus 2213590 t/m2 Compressive Strength 2500 t/m2 Tensile Strength 200 t/m2 Specific Weight 2.5 t/m3 Table 2: Steel Properties Young's Modulus 20389000 t/m2 2 Yield Strength 36000 t/m Ultimate Strength 52000 t/m2 3.5 Mesh Sensitivity Mesh sensitivity analysis was carried out to obtain the optimum size of mesh to be used for each structural member in our case study, aiming to balance between the results preciseness and the required analysis time. The study was performed on a typical 5 m span building and the case of edge ground column removal was conducted. Four mesh groups were tested and mesh group (3) was chosen as shown in Table 3. Table 3: Properties of Mesh Group (3) Number of Mesh Group Beams Columns Slabs Elements 3 29586 16x3x3 12x3x3 14x14x2 3.6 Studied Parameters Four cases were chosen to study plan irregularity, where the typical plan consisting of five bays in each direction, each 5m span, is used as the master plan for each of the four cases. The chosen cases were as follows: a. Varying the span of the middle bay in one direction only. b. Varying the span of the external bay in one direction only. c. Varying the span of the middle bay in both directions. d. Varying the span of the external bay in both directions. Where the spans studied in each case were 5m, 7m, and 9m and the removal of ground column was studied in all cases from several locations. Removal of edge and interior columns was studied for case (a). Removal of corner, edge, and interior columns was studied for case (b).