DOCSLIB.ORG

The Open Shop, Number Nine Business Men's Association of Omaha

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Open Shop, Number Nine Business Men's Association of Omaha University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Digitized Books Archives & Special Collections 9-20-1920 The Open Shop, Number Nine Business Men's Association of Omaha Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/ascdigitizedbooks Part of the Labor History Commons, and the Labor Relations Commons Recommended Citation Business Men's Association of Omaha, "The Open Shop, Number Nine" (1920). Digitized Books. 9. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/ascdigitizedbooks/9 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Archives & Special Collections at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digitized Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Obe C)pen @)bop Published by THE BUSINESS MEN'S ASSOCIATION of OMAHA NUMBER NINE SEPTEMBER 20, 1920 Americanism or Classism ? The time is fast approaching when we assured us by their embodiment in the must decide the political issues involved in Constitution. the coming election. It is true in this Remember, besides a President, we are election as it has been in the past that the to elect members of the National Congress vital issues are based upon the economic and officers of the state government. Test problems that face us. Regardless of all them by the issue as well. The American the noise that is being made and the voter should weigh the statements of the charges and countercharges that are candidates in their relation to the welfare hurled back and forth there are some im­ of the whole people and not to one class. portant issues that must be studied and We see the results of class dictation in conclusions that must be arrived at in a Russia and the ominous threats of it in dispassionate manner. England. Let us have none of it in America. Probably the most vital issue before us Which candidates will carry out the today is the one brought about by the rise principles of Americanism as we have of classism .in this country. We see an developed them in the century and a organized industrial cla$S entering into the half of our life as a nation? This is campaign with the avowed purpose of the rule by which to gauge the candi­ " rewarding its friends and defeating its dates. Go to the polls on November 2 enemies."" Its friends are either those and vote intelligently on this jlreat whose official acts in the past have been issue. particularly satisfactory to this class or who give assurance, if elected, to so act. Its enemies are those who have had the C. of C. Approves Open Shop courage of their convictions and whose By an overwhelming majority the convictions have at some time or other Chamber of Commerce of the United run contrary to the views of organized States approved the open shop principle labor's leaders. The test is not what may in industry in a recent referendum sub­ be best for the American people as a whole, but what will serve this class most. mitted to its members. That labor organi­ zations should be compelled to assume We grant every man the right to vote responsibility for their contracts and his own convictions. That makes it all agreements the same as other organiza­ the more the duty of every man, who tions and that strikes on public utilities ls interested in the welfare of all the should be forbidden, with tribunals pro­ people, to arouse himself· and put vided to fix wages and working conditions down the sinister movement that received almost unanimous approval. seeks to benefit one class only. This action by the National Chamber ef Study the party platforms, the speeches Commerce is significant of a growing of acceptance and subsequent pronounce­ feeling in this country that the day of the ments of the leading candidates and closed union shop is doomed and that regardless of party affiliations vote for the American industry intends to free itself perpetuation of those American principles therefrom. The "handwriting on the wall" that were first declared by that intrepid ought to be apparent to the leaders of group of men on July 4, 1776 and later organized labor. 2 Our Creed "Umbrella Mike" A Leader "The Open Shop" Belleves- Another "leader.. of organized labor has ln close co-operation between employer received considerable publicity in the past and employees, in united whole-hearted effort by both to achieve the greatest good few months. Catered to by public officials, for their mutual interest and that of the is it any wonder that he has resorted to the public. most absurd means in asserting his In the settlement of problems between leadership? employer and employee by direct, open and fair negotiation. In January, 1917, after being convicted In fair wages, good working conditions of conspiracy to violate the Sherman Anti­ and complete freedom of employment, trust law by keeping non-union material both by employers and employees. out of Chicago, Michael Boyle, better "The Open Shop" Opposes the known as ··umbrella Mike,·· was sentenced "Closed Shop"- by Federal Judge Landis to one year in Because by this, union labor demands of prison. According to the Chicago Tribune, the employer that none but union members "'A reign of terror followed the labor move. be given work. that there be created a Gunners and bombers got on the job, monopoly of labor in the han~s of union according to the charges, and a great deal leaders. of property was deitroyed"' Because this principle is perniciously This character got his sobriquet from his unfair and unjust to the individual, who practice of hanging his umbrella on a bar has the right to exercise his own judgment rail in a Chicago saloon and compelling as to whether or not he wishes to become contractors and owners to drop a substan­ a member of a union and whose right to tial cash contribution therein in order to earn a livelihood for himself and family insure them against strikes while their should not be dependent upon that decision. buildings were being constructed. He is Because it is uneconomic in its tendency reputed to be worth $500,000. to destroy ambition, restrict production A legal fight lasting nearly three years and lower all workmen to a dead level of ensued, but the sentence was affirmed by mediocrity. the United States Circuit Court of Appeals Because it is thoroughly un-American and Boyle began to serve his sentence last and undemocratic in the facility with January. On April 28 the whole country which it lends itself to the creation of class was astounded to hear that President antagonism and class politics. Wilson had pardoned him. While Mike "The Open Shop" is for a square was under sentence he was re-elected deal for the public, the employer and business agent of the Electrical the employee, union or non-union. Workers' Union, and when llberated he immediately called a strike of the "Divine'*' '*' Rill,hts" * union electricians, completely tying, The Courts of Kansas have upheld the up the street car system of Chicag,o. new Kansas Court of Industrial Relations, Boyle's demand was that the south side car shops which had been operated as open and Judge Curran, who rendered the decision said: "The divine right to strike, shop, should be closed to all but union where it affects the health and welfare men. of the public must be relegated to the It might be interesting to know that realm where the divine right of kings has a protege of "Umbrella Mike," one Ray­ been sent. In stressing the divine right to mond Cleary, also convicted and while out strike, the divine right to work, the right on bond spent the spring and summer of of a man to have employment so he can 1917 in Omaha as a leader of Omaha provide for his wife and children has been workmen in the Building Trades strike of sadly overlooked." that year. 3 Omaha Street Car Decision "In general the service of the Com­ On August 18, the Nebraska State Rail­ pany is of a high standard. It now operates a larger number of cars, with way Commission rendered its decision in a greater mileage than at any previous the action instituted before it by the union time In its history. It a.lso hes upon its employees of the Omaha 81. Council Bluffs payroll a larger number of men than ever before, and at present there is no Street Railway Company, for an increased lack of men." wage scale, declining to grant any increase The opinion of the Commission discusses whatsoever. wages at length and states that 720 train­ The union employees complained the men working 25 days or more during May, wages paid were not sufficient to enable 1920 (a typical month), earned an average the Company to keep an adequate number wage of $152.66, the highest wage earned of competent conductors and motormen, for the month 'being $204.98; that the thereby impairing the service, and alleged remaining 138 men included those who for they had taken a strike vote and intended one reason or another did not work 25 to strike if adequate relief in wages was not days, and that- provided by the Commission. An increase "T tis a fair statement to say that of 13 cents per hour was demanded for those who were experienced and trainmen who now receive from 53 cents to worked faithfully during 26 days of 57 cents per hour, and a corresponding the month and a reasonable number of hours per day, received on the average increase for othe.r employees.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Employer's "Good Faith" Bargaining Duty--A Troublesome Test in the Taft-Hartley Act
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 17 Issue 5 Article 11 1966 The Employer's "Good Faith" Bargaining Duty--A Troublesome Test in the Taft-Hartley Act Francis A. King Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Francis A. King, The Employer's "Good Faith" Bargaining Duty--A Troublesome Test in the Taft-Hartley Act, 17 W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 1390 (1966) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol17/iss5/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 1390 WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 17:1390 The Employer's "Good Faith" Bargaining Duty- A Troublesome Test in the Taft-Hartley Act A CHARGE FREQUENTLY LEVELED against employers in proceed- ings before the National Labor Relations Board is the refusal to bargain in good faith as required by sections 8(a) (5) and 8(d) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) of 1947.1 Since approximately one-third of all cases heard by the NLRB involve refusal-to-bargain charges,2 it is important for an employer to know what activities on his part will give rise to such a charge. This is increasingly true in light of recent decisions requiring the employer to bargain over such issues as subcontracting, plant removal, and other activities
    [Show full text]
  • Government Mandated Labor Agreements in Public Construction
    GOVERNMENT MANDATED LABOR AGREEMENTS IN PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION Their History and Factors to Consider Table of Contents The History of Government Mandated Labor Agreements in the Construction Industry . 1 Government Mandated Labor Agreements In Public Construction: Factors to Consider . 7 THE HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT MANDATED LABOR AGREEMENTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY How Public Officials and Their Representatives Have Changed The Purposes and Effects of Construction Project Labor Agreements What are Construction Project Labor Agreements? Project labor agreements are unique to the construction industry. Unlike collective bargaining agreements between other industrial employers and their unions, collective bargaining agreements in the construction industry usually apply only to work performed by signatory contractors in specified counties or other well-defined geographic areas. Project labor agreements are even more specialized and focus on one particular construction project. They are often referred to as “prehire” agreements because they are usually negotiated between construction contractors and one or more building trade union in advance of submitting a bid for the project, and before anyone is actually hired to perform the work. The terms and conditions of a project labor agreement generally: (1) apply to all work performed on a specific project or at a specific location, (2) require recognition of the signatory union(s) as the exclusive bargaining representatives for covered workers, whether or not the workers are union members, (3) supersede all other collective bargaining agreements, (4) prohibit strikes and lockouts, (5) require hiring through union referral systems, (6) require all contractors and subcontractors to become signatory to the agreement, (7) establish standard work rules, hours and dispute resolution procedures and (8) establish wages and benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • KEEPING MINNEAPOLIS an OPEN SHOP TOWN the Citizens' Alliance in the 1930S
    KEEPING MINNEAPOLIS AN OPEN SHOP TOWN The Citizens' Alliance in the 1930s Lois Quam and Peter J. Rachleff SINCE the Industrial Revolution, workers have organ­ forces—it relied on various "carrots"—pensions, vaca­ ized to build unions. Maintaining and expanding these tions, insurance, and even company unions. At the unions, however, has called for even greater organ­ same time, employer organization itself was strength­ ization. Employers responded to solidarity in kind, but ened, ranging in size and power from trade associations they united in order to resist and repel unionization. that worked with Secretary of Commerce (and later Usually, the two parties' strengths have been in inverse President) Herbert C. Hoover to locally based organi­ relation: a period in which employers have been well zations committed to keeping their communities and organized has typically found workers' groups to be their industries nonunion.' weak, and vice versa. When both sides were well orga­ No local employers' group achieved greater notoriety nized the consequences were dramatic. than the Minneapolis Citizens' Alliance (CA). Class- By the early 20th century, opposition to unions took conscious industrialists, merchants, and lawyers had on increasingly organized form. A nationwide "open worked together in the City of Lakes during the 1917-18 shop drive" between 1902 and I9I7 threatened unions trolley strikes. Over the course of the 1920s, they from the building trades to the metal shops. After a strengthened their organization and assumed the lead­ brief truce during World War I, employers introduced ership of the entire Minneapolis business community. the "American Plan," geared both to driving out exist­ By the early 1930s they had gained nationwide atten­ ing unions and to forestalling any new efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS
    GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS ABEYANCE – The placement of a pending grievance (or motion) by mutual agreement of the parties, outside the specified time limits until a later date when it may be taken up and processed. ACTION - Direct action occurs when any group of union members engage in an action, such as a protest, that directly exposes a problem, or a possible solution to a contractual and/or societal issue. Union members engage in such actions to spotlight an injustice with the goal of correcting it. It further mobilizes the membership to work in concerted fashion for their own good and improvement. ACCRETION – The addition or consolidation of new employees or a new bargaining unit to or with an existing bargaining unit. ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE - A general wage increase that covers all the members of a bargaining unit, regardless of classification, grade or step level. Such an increase may be in terms of a percentage or dollar amount. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE – An agent of the National Labor Relations Board or the public sector commission appointed to docket, hear, settle and decide unfair labor practice cases nationwide or statewide in the public sector. They also conduct and preside over formal hearings/trials on an unfair labor practice complaint or a representation case. AFL-CIO - The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations is the national federation of unions in the United States. It is made up of fifty-six national and international unions, together representing more than 12 million active and retired workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockouts and Strike Insurance in Multiemployer Collective Bargaining
    LOCKOUTS AND STRIKE INSURANCE IN MULTIEMPLOYER COLLECTIVE BARGAINING By NORMAN BUCHSBAUN,* INTRODUCTION "The growth of unions in the United States and the structure of bargaining arrangements are closely related to the development and structure of mar- kets for the products on which union members work." Competition in product markets from non-union employers and increased employee mobil- ity resulting in additional needs for staff services1 are factors accounting for union attempts to broaden the membership. Growing union strength was quickly reflected by the appearance of groups of employers forming into associations as a vigorous opposition. Such associations were organized in the 1880's as counterweights to the Knights of Labor. Primarily a technique used by large corporations, the associations were well-funded and employed detectives and armed guards and also maintained blacklists, occasionally resorting to lockouts in an effort to thwart the growth of the trade union movement. Despite the ap- parent anti-union animus of many employers, trade unions won recogni- tion, and to meet this development, the associations organized labor bu- reaus to operate plants of struck members.2 After the gradual acceptance of collective bargaining, the National Association of Manufacturers spon- sored open-shop movements. 3 Kerr and Randall suggest that the employer association had by 1948 become a leading defensive technique used by small employers in bargaining with strong unions. 4 Thus unionization of employers raises many problems relating to responsibility and good faith in collective bargaining, the real locus of power and the effects on union democracy of the enlargement of the bargaining unit, and a host of fringe questions relating to antitrust matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Law. Freedom of Speech. Employer's Statement of Open
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW Labor Law-Freedom of Speech-Employer's Statement of Open-Shop Policy or Issuance of Anti-union Literature as Unfair Labor Practice-[Federal].-The decisions of two circuit courts of appeals have raised several questions with respect to the National Labor Relations Act:x (i)Does the act prohibit non-coercive statements of opinion by an employer intended to influence his employees in respect to unioniza- tion activities? (2) Under what circumstances will a statement which on its face is non- coercive be regarded as coercive? (3)Does prohibition of such statements violate the employer's right to freedom of speech? In one case an employer, almost immediately after a unionization drive was begun, enclosed in each pay envelope a statement of open-shop policy. Shortly thereafter, plant operations were decreased, employees active in the organizational movement were discharged, and a company union was fostered. The National Labor Relations Board found that under the surrounding circumstances, the declaration of policy, "de- signed to discourage organizational efforts," was an unfair labor practice under Section 8(i)2 of the National Labor Relations Act.3 On petition by the board to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for a decree enforcing its cease and desist order, held, that there was substantial evidence to sustain the board's findings. Decree of en- forcement granted. NLRB v. Elkland Leather Co.4 In the other case, an employer dis- tributed to his employees literature which criticized and argued against unions. In ad- dition, employees engaged in organizational activities were discharged, and physical force was used to prevent pro-union literature from being distributed.
    [Show full text]
  • Strikebreaking and the Labor Market in the United States, 1881-1894
    Strikebreaking and the Labor Market in the United States, 1881-1894 JOSHUA L. ROSENBLOOM Using data from a sample of over 2,000 individual strikes in the United States from 1881 to 1894 this article examines geographic, industrial, and temporal variations in the use of strikebreakers and the sources from which they were recruited. The use of strikebreakers was not correlated with the business cycle and did not vary appreciably by region or city size, but employers located outside the Northeast or in smaller cities were more likely to use replacement workers recruited from other places. The use of strikebreakers also varied considerably across industries, and was affected by union authorization and strike size. he forces determining wages and working conditions in American labor Tmarkets were radically altered in the decades after the Civil War. Im- provements in transportation and communication increased the ability of workers to migrate in response to differential opportunities and encouraged employers in labor-scarce areas to recruit workers from relatively more labor-abundant regions. As local labor markets became increasingly in- tegrated into broader regional and national labor markets during the late nineteenth century, competitive pressures on wages and working conditions grew, and the scope for local variations in the terms of employment de- clined.1 In many industries these pressures were further compounded by technological changes that encouraged the increasingly fine division of labor and enabled employers to replace skilled craftworkers with semiskilled operatives or unskilled laborers.2 The impact of these developments on American workers was profound. Broader labor markets and technological changes expanded employment opportunities for some workers, but for others they undermined efforts to increase wages and improve working conditions.3 The increasing elasticity The Journal of Economic History, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collective Agreement for the Union Shop
    THE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE UNION SHOP LEON M. DEsPSs* NKNOWN to the courts a half century ago, the "closed shop" or union shop contract has received increasing judicial attention, particularly during the last fifteen years. With union organiza- tion itself formerly illegal, the union shop contract was, of course, also illegal. With judicial acceptance of union organization, however, the judi- cial attitude toward the union shop contract has undergone an important and exceedingly interesting development, which it is the purpose of this article to trace. At the outset, a preliminary question of terminology is posed. Like its counterpart "open shop," the term "dosed shop" rings with overtones and conflicts; "open shop" and "closed shop" have become "but battle cries in the conflict between employers and labor organizations over the problem of unionization."' Formerly the meaning of the terms "open shop" and "closed shop" was quite different from their present meaning. A "closed shop" was an unfair shop in which a union had forbidden its mem- bers to work; and an "open shop" was a shop in which a union permitted its members to work. Declaring a shop "open" was equivalent to calling off a strike or boycott.2 The change in meaning occurred about 189o. Al- though perhaps first used by unionists, the term "closed shop" was seized upon by employers to obtain the greatest possible advantage in publicizing its unfavorable connotations. Trade unionists have often since condemned the term, saying that the only closed shop is the so-called "open shop" which is really closed to union members.3 "Open shop" and "closed shop" have thus become catchwords which obscure the underlying issues; and to avoid the use of those terms, this article will use the term "union shop," * Member of the Illinois Bar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Shop Union, Wages and Management Opposition
    The Open Shop Union, Wages and Management Opposition. by Robin Naylor and Oddb j,'rn Raaum Department of Economics University of Warwick No. 332 November 1989 This paper is circulated for discussion purposes only and its contents should be considered preliminary. The Open Shop Union, Wages and Management Opposition. In Robin Naylor and Oddbjom Raaum Warwick Economic Research Paper no. 332 Department of Economics University of Warwick Coventry, UK November 1989 1 I Introduction The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical model in which the level of union membership and the union wage mark-up are determined endogenously. This contrasts with most of the recent work on the economic theory of the trade union which has assumed a union closed shop and then focussed on the union objective function and the bargaining framework. We would argue that the empirical evidence on the pattern of union density across establishments, in the UK at least, indicates the importance of explaining the existence of the open shop, where union membership exists but can be less than 100% of the workforce. For example, Millward and Stevens (1986) in their report on the 1984 Workplace Industrial Relations Survey show that union density is at some intermediate level in as many as 50% of all private sector establishments. A closed shop is present in fewer than half the establishments in which union members are present. Furthermore, it is likely that the ability of the union to obtain a wage mark- up will depend, amongst other things, upon the level of union membership and the associated bargaining arrangements in the establishment.) This underlines the need to explain the determinants of density in analysing union wage effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening the Closed Shop
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository OPENING THE CLOSED SHOP: THE GALVESTON LONGSHOREMEN'S STRIKE, 1920-1921 A Thesis by JOSEPH ANTHONY ABEL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2004 Major Subject: History OPENING THE CLOSED SHOP: THE GALVESTON LONGSHOREMEN'S STRIKE, 1920-1921 A Thesis by JOSEPH ANTHONY ABEL Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved as to style and content by: _________________________ _________________________ David Vaught Robert Resch (Chair of Committee) (Member) _________________________ _________________________ Gregory Pappas Walter Buenger (Member) (Head of Department) December 2004 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT Opening the Closed Shop: The Galveston Longshoremen’s Strike, 1920-1921. (December 2004) Joseph Anthony Abel, B.A., University of Houston Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. David Vaught Beginning in March of 1920, the Galveston coastwise longshoremen’s strike against the Morgan-Southern Pacific and Mallory steamship lines was a pivotal moment in the history of organized labor in Texas. Local and statewide business interests proved their willingness to use the state apparatus by calling on Governor William P. Hobby and the Texas National Guard to open the Port of Galveston. Despite this, the striking dockworkers maintained the moral support of many local citizens from a variety of social classes, including small merchants and officials of the Galveston municipal government. By February of 1921, however, the segregated locals representing the striking longshoremen had fallen victim to the divisive racial tactics of the shipping companies, who implemented the open-shop policy of non-discrimination in hiring on their docks.
    [Show full text]
  • Wages and Work Practices in Union and Open Shop
    WAGES AND WORK PRACTICES IN UNION AND OPEN SHOP CONSTRUCTION by Clinton Currier Bourdon Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on December 15, 1982 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctorate in Philosophy This is the most complete text of the thesis available. The following page(s) were not included in the copy of the thesis deposited in the Institute Archives by the author: (title page) MASSACHUStTS NSTTUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 0cT 208 6 4~A~8 Abstract WAGES AND WORK PRACTICES IN UNION AND OPEN SHOP CONSTRUCTION by Clinton Currier Bourdon Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on December 15, 1982 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctorate in Philosophy ABSTRACT Craft unions in the construction industry have long enjoyed relatively high hourly wages and benefits and have played major roles in the training, hiring, and assignment of construction labor. But in the 1970s they became increasingly threatened by the widespread growth of nonunion construction firms and labor. This spread of nonunion firms in the industry permits a detailed comparison of compensation and work practices in the union and open shop sectors of construction. This comparison allows a unique analysis of the union impact on both compen- sation and construction labor market institutions. A single-equation econometric estimation of the union/nonunion wage differential in construction using a micro-data base on workers' wages, characteristics, and union status provided evidence of a union wage differential in construction exceeding fifty percent. But further analysis showed that this estimate may be biased upward by the heter- eogenity of skills and occupations in construction as well as by the positive correlation of wages and union status.
    [Show full text]
  • Right to Work – Frequently Asked Questions
    Right to Work – Frequently Asked Questions What is “Right to Work”? This term refers to legislation that prohibits requiring employees to join (pay dues) or financially support a union (through service fees) in order to keep their job in a unionized workforce. Which other states have Right to Work legislation? In addition to Michigan, 23 other states have right to work laws: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wyoming. What is the impact of Public Act 348 of 2012 and Public Act 349 of 2012 (formerly known as SB 116 and HB4003, respectively) on Michigan employees? These amendments prohibit requiring Michigan employees to either join a union as full members or to join as “service fee” payers in order to be hired or to remain employed in a position that is part of a collective bargaining unit in a unionized workforce. What is the difference between a “union member” and a “bargaining unit member”? A bargaining unit member is an employee who, by virtue of their position title and/or job duties, is “covered” under a collective bargaining agreement. At CMU, we have three academic bargaining units (FA/MEA/NEA; UTF/AFT-Michigan, AFL/CIO; GSU/AFT- Michigan, AFL/CIO) and six staff bargaining units (AFSCME 1568; UAW 6888; NABET 412; STA/MEA; POAM; FOPLC). A union member is a bargaining unit member who agrees to membership in the union as demonstrated by his/her signing a dues authorization card.
    [Show full text]