DOCSLIB.ORG

District Census Handbook, 18-Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
District Census Handbook, 18-Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh ,- - - --------_ ____r- ____ _ _ _ _ .__ I 1---------------------------------------- , I • , I Census of India, 1951 II DISTRICT CENSUS , . HANDBOOK UTTAR PRADESH I 18-FARll.UKHABAD DISTRICT \ ..1 I • ,... - - ALLAHABAD: • SuPER I.NTI:"·, . ', . 'F::N'l :-:- AND STATIONERY. UTTAR PRADESH, f '!>lol • 1!l 54 .- r--------.- - -----------I DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOO~ 1951 F ARRUKHABAD DISTRICT FOREWORD Several States, including Uttar Pradesh, have been publishing village statistics by districts at each census. In 1941 they were published in U. P. under the title "District Census Statistics" with a separate volume for each district. In the 1951 census, when the tabulation has been more elaborate than ever in view of the require ... ments of the country, the district ... wise volume has been expanded into a "District Census Handbook", which now contains the District Census Tables (furnishing data with break.... up for census tracts within the district), the District Index of Non .... agricultural Occupations, agricultural statistics from 1901 .... 02 to 1950 .... 51 and other miscellaneous statistics in addition to the usual village population statistics. The village population statistics also are given in an elaborate form giving the division of the population among eight livelihood classes and other details. 2. It may be added here that a separate set of district .... wise volumes giving only population figures of rural areas by villages and of urban areas by wards and mohallas and entitled "District Population Statistics" has already been published. This separate series was necessitated by the urgent requirements of the U. P. Government for elections to local bodies. The printing of the District Census Handbooks involves colossal work and is bound to take some time. RAJESHW ARI PRASAD, I.A.S., RAMPUR: Superintendent, Census Operations, December 3 I, 1954. Uttar Pradesh. CONTENTS Pagel> INTRODUCTION - A-The District i-ii B-Analysis of the Statistics iii-x C-Explanatory note on the Statistics x-xii PART I__;DISTRICT CENSUS TABLES A -:;E~ERAL POPUIA.TlON TABLES- A-I Area, Houses and Population .) A-II Variation in Population during Fifty ~ears 3 A-III Towns and Villages Classified by Population 4-5 A-IV Towns Classified by Population with Variations since 1901 6 A-V Towns arranged Territorially with Population by Livelihood Classes 7 E Area and Population of District and Tehsils by Livelihood Classes 8-9 B-EcONOMIC TABLEs- B-I Livelihood Classes and Sub-classes 10-13 B-II Secondary Means of Livelihood 14-23 B-Il I Employers, Employees and Independen t Workers in Industrieil and Services by Di visions and Sub-divisions 24-51 B-IV Unemployment by Livelihood Classes 52-53 Index of Non-agricultural Occupations 54-57 C-:1C>USBHOLD AND AGE (SAMPLE) TABLES­ C-l Household (Size and Composition) 58-59 C-Il Livelihood Classes by Age-grou;ls 60-65 C-III Age and Civil Condition 66-6\> C-IV Age and Literacy 70-73 C-V Single Year Age Returns 14--81 D -SOCIAL AND CULTURAL TABLES- D-I Languages (i) Mother Tongue 82-83 fii) Bilingualism 84-85 j):IIIWigion 86-87 D-11 I Schetiuled Castes 86-87 D-IV Migrants 88-91 D-V (i) Displaced persons by year of arrival in India 92-93 (ii) Displaced persons by Livelihood Classes 92-93 D-VI Non-Indian Nationals 92-93 D-VlI Livelihood Classes bv Educational Standards 94-99 PART {I-VILLAGE, TOWN, PARGANA AND THANA STATISTICS 1 Primar~· Census Abstract " 102-157 2 Pargana and Thana-wise Population 158 PART III-MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICS Vital Statistics 160-163 2 Agricultural Statistics-(i) Rainfall 164-165 (ii) Area as classified with details of area under cultivation .. 166-169 (iii) Cropped Area 170-185 (iv) Irrigated Area 186-189 3 Live-Stnck, Agricultural Machinery and Implements 190-193 4 List of Primary Schools 194-197 INTRODUCTION A-THE DISTRICT 1. The district of Farrukhabad lies along the Ganga which forms its northern and easterD beunti:uy ... On the west of the district are Etah and Mainpuri, on the south and south­ east are Etawah and Kanpur, on the east is Hardoi and on the north are Shahjahanpur and Buclaun. The district has a total area of 1,607 square miles which is less than the a~erage district area of the State. Its population in 1951 was about 10'9 lakhs. It has 4 tehstls, 16 parganas and 18 thanas. 2. The district is level plain varied only by a few gentle undulations and by the slopes, Topography sometimes gradual and sometimes abrupt, which lead down to the river valleys. The only marked variation of level is between the two divisions in which the district naturally falls­ the upland, or bfl.1lgar which is a continuation of the Doab plain, and the lowland, or tarai, cut away from the upland by the erosive action of the rivers. The bangar and the tarai are to ~e found in all the tehsils. In tehsil Farrukhabad the Ganga tarai is not very extensive and IS separated from the bangar by sharply defined cliff. In tehsil Kaimganj the tarai has been formed by the erosive action of the Ganga and is sometimes covered by its waters. Mast of the tehsil constitutes the watershed between the Ganga and the Bagar, and the country south of the latter has strongly marked usar characteristics. Tehsil Kannauj is divided into upland 8Il(1-~lewItme,.,.thethree rivers, the Ganga, the Kali Nadi and the Isan. The ravines are ov«grown with sarpat grass while it is always liable to the ravages of kartS and dab. In tehsil Chhibramau the JVhole tract consists of bangar or upland and tarai or the lowland adjoining rivers Ganga and Isan. The Isan country consists of a belt of tarai land, followed on the south by a belt of bhur broken up by erosion in many places into a net work of ravines. The Ganga tarai, which is marked off from the bangar by a stiff abrupt cliff, is very small and con­ tains no cultivation. Several large stretches of dhak jungle are to be found. The Ganga is the main drain into which all the rivers fall with a general course from west to east, .~ smaller drainage channels in their turn running generally north and south fro~ the watersheds of the rivers. The principal rivers and streams are Ganga, Ram Ganga, Kah Nadi, Isan, Burh Ganga, Bagar, Pandu and the Rind. Of these the first four alone are paren­ Dial, the rest being mere channels for the escape of surplus drainage and ceasing to flow soon after the close of the monsoon. Though the Ganga is constantly changing its course its move­ ments from side to side are for the most part slow and gradual with a tendency to continue in one directiDn for many yean t~h€l'. WMD swoll@B by raing Ram Ganga fre.qlJently floods the lowlands and leaves behind a sterile deposit of sand. Kali Nadi forms the border of Farrukhabad and Mainpuri. Thert! are a number of lakes and jhilS. In Chhibramau tehsil Talgram pargall3 contains no less than eight large jhils. In Kannauj tehsil pargalla l'irwa has also a large number of important jhils. 3. Throughout the district the soils are divided into three natural classes of dumat or SoUs loam, matiyar or clay and bhur or sand. But though the same nomenclature is employed for both the upland and the lowland soils, they differ greatly in character. In the upland the names have the same meaning as elsewhere in the Doab. Dumat is a fertile loam which is soft to the touch when powdered. Bhur is a sandy soil, rough to the touch. Matiyar is the stiff clay which ordinarily grows rice in the rains; when dry it splits into fissures and becomes as hard .as baked brick. But in tara; the soil is everywhere al1uvial, consisting of a stratum of loam .of varying thickness more or less intermixed with sand overlying a bed of white river sand. When the admixture of sand is l~rge it is known as bhur, when rice is commonly grown on it it is called matiyarwhile in other cases it is classified as dumat. In the Ganga tarai this layer ·of loam is generally not more than two to four feet in depth, where it is known as papar, but it thickens and improves in quality towards the cliff, receiving in Kannau] tehsil the special name kachoha. 4. The figures of the classification of the area during the last fifty years are given in Classi;ficatioa Table 2 of Part III of this volume. The proportion of the area under the various catego.ries of area works out as follows for 1950-51 : Actual figures Percentage (in acres) Cultivated area 681,613 64'3 Cultivable waste (excluding current fallow) 168,812 15'9 ,Current falfow 40,457 3'8 Forest 2 0'0 Area not available for.cultivation of which- 169,624 16'0 (a) Covered wi1h water 51,827 4'9 (b) UIUiu #Us, ,..oads _,j buildings 30,184 2',8 (c) Barren 87,613 8'3 ii The figu;e in the above. table. regarding culturable. waste taken from t~ Season and Crop Report IS, however, mislead mg. The State AO'rtcultur'e Department cbQd t d . 1949-50 a detailed enquiry through the District Oflice;s regarding the nature of t~ e '.n each district. The following analysis of the area resulted from this enqviry : area m Area Particulars (in acres) Percentage Total culturable waste (A+B+C) 170,923 100 !\-Area under culturable waste land not available for immediate cultivation 53,712 31'42 (i) Forest under any legal enacrlnent ,.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Territoires Infectés À La Date Du 6 Juillet 1961 — Infected Areas As on 6 July 1961
    — 292 Territoires infectés à la date du 6 juillet 1961 — Infected areas as on 6 July 1961 Notiücatioiis reçues aux termes du Règlement sanitaire international Notifications received under the International Sanitary Regulations concernant les circonscriptions infectées ou les territoires où la pré­ relating to infected local areas and to areas in which the presence of sence de maladies quarantenaircs a été signalée (voir page 283). quarantinable diseases was reported (see page 283). ■ = Circonscriptions ou territoires notifiés aux termes de l’article 3 ■ = Areas notified under Article 3 on the date indicated. à la date donnée. Autres territoires où la présence de maladies quarantenaires a été Other areas in which the presence of quarantinable diseases was notifiée aux termes des articles 4, 5 et 9 (a): notified under Articles 4, 5 and 9 (a): A = pendant la période indiquée sous le nom de chaque maladie; A = during the period indicated under the heading of each disease; B = antérieurement à la période indiquée sous le nom de chaque B = prior to the period indicated under' the heading of each maladie. disease. * = territoires nouvellement infectés. * = newly infected areas. PESTE — PLAGUE Bihar, State NIGÈRIA — NIGERIA. ■ 1.X.56 CÔTE D’IVOIRE — IVORY COASI Cliamparan, District , . ■ 25.V I8.vi-6.vn RUANDA-URUNDI . ■ ll.Xn.56 Abengourou, Cercle. A 22. VI Darbhanga, District. , . ■ I.VI A 22.VI Gaya, D istric t................ ■ 23.IV Abidjan, Cercle .... SIERRA LEONE . ■ 1.X.56 Agboville, Cercle .... A 15. VI Afrique — Africa Monghyr, District . ■ 20.V Muzaifarpur, District . , « 9.V Bouaflé, Cercle................ A 22.VI Palamau, District .... ■ 29.\'I SOUDAN — SUDAN Bouaké, Cercle...............
    [Show full text]
  • District Population Statistics, 4-Meerut, Uttar Pradesh
    I Census of India, 195 1 DISTRICT POPULATION STATISTICS UTTAR PRADESH 4-MEEl{UT DISTRICT 315.42 ALLAHABAD: TING AND STATIONERY, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA 1951 1952 MEE DPS Price, Re.1-S. FOREWORD THE Uttar Pradesh Government asked me in March. 1952, (0 'supply them for the purposes of elections to local bodies population statistics with ,separation for scheduled castes (i) mohalla/ward-wise for urban areas, and (ii) village-wise for rural areas. The Census Tabulation Plan did nbt provide for sorting of scheduled cast<;s population for areas smaller than a tehsil or urban tract and the request from the Uttar Pradesh Government came when the slip sorting had been finished and (he Tabulation Offices closed. As the census slips are mixed up for the purposes of sorting in one lot for a tehsil or urban tract, collection of data regarding scheduled castes population by moh'allas/wards and villages would have involved enormous labour and expense if sorting of the slips had been taken up afresh. Fortunately, however, a secondary census record, viz. the National Citizens' Register, in which each slip has been copied, was available. By singular foresight it had been pre­ pared mohalla/ward-wise for urban areas and village-wise for rural areas. Th e required information has, therefore. been extracted from. this record, 2. In the above circumstances there is a slight difference in the figures of population as arrived at by an earlier sorting of the slips and as now determined by counting from the National Citizens' Register. This difference has been accen mated by an order passed by me during the later coum from the National Register of Citizens as follows:- (i) Count Ahirwars of Farrukhabad District, Raidas and Bhagar as ·Chamars'.
    [Show full text]
  • Tragedy Strikes up Again - Horrific Farrukhabad Incident
    Tragedy strikes UP again - Horrific Farrukhabad Incident Fact Finding Exercise in Villages of Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh HRLN Representatives: Aman Khan, Advocate; and Shaoni Mukherjee, Researcher Human Rights Law Network Reproductive Rights Initiative, 576, Masjid Road, Jangpura New Delhi, India 110014 1 After the shocking Gorakhpur tragedy that occurred in August 2017, news emerged of a similar incident in Farrukhabad, another district in Uttar Pradesh. In Gorakhpur, more than 100 children lost their lives due to medical negligence. Now, in Farrukhabad, newspapers are again filled with accounts of 49 deaths that occurred in Farrukhabad Govt. Hospital (Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital) between July 21 and August 20, 2017.1 Uttar Pradesh has the second highest maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in India, at 258 deaths per 100,000 live births2, as well as the highest infant mortality rate (IMR) of 64 deaths3 per 1000 Live births, and 78 deaths per 1000 live births when it comes to children under 5. Farrukhabad itself has a staggering IMR of 78, and under 5 Mortality Rate of 54 per 1000 live births. Farrukhabad, a rural district situated in Northern Uttar Pradesh has many children dying due to diarrhea, anemia, and respiratory infections – making it necessary to shed light on the hazardous environmental conditions in this district. A mere 6.9% of children in Farrukhabad receive an adequate nutritional diet. 38.7% of children are diagnosed with anemia, 31.4% are underweight, and a staggering 49.10% have stunted growth4. The figures reflect the dire situation of this district, especially regarding the health of infants. From August 2017, Gorakhpur, another district in the state of Uttar Pradesh witnessed the loss of more than 100 children in the span of a week due to medical negligence relating to the treatment of a potentially fatal disease, Acute Encephalitis, a lack of oxygen supply needed for treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • District Population Statistics, 22 Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh
    .------·1 Census of India, 1951 I DISTRICT POPULATION STATISTICS UTTAR PRADESH 22-ALLAHABAD DISTRICT t I 315.42 ALLAHABAD: PluNnNG AND STATIONERY, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA 1951 1953 ALL CPS Price, Re.1-S. FOREWORD THE Uttar Pradesh Government asked me in March, 1952, to supply them for the purposes of elections to local bodies population statistics with separation for scheduled castes (i) mohalla/ward -wise for urban areas, and (ii) village-wise for rural areas. The Census Tabulation Plan did not provide for sorting of scheduled castes population for areas smaller than a tehsil or urban tract and the request from the Uttar Pradesh Government came when the slip sorting had been finished and the Tabulation Offices closed. As the census slips are mixed up for the purposes of sorting in one lot for a tehsil or urban tract, collection of data regarding scheduled castes population by mohallas/wards and villages would have involved enormous labour and expense if sorting of the slips had been taken up afresh. Fortunately, however, a secondary census record, viz. the National Citizens' Register, in which each slip has been copied, was available. By singular foresight it had been pre­ pared mohalla/ward-wise for urban areas and village-wise for rural areas. The required information has, therefore, been extracted from this record. 2. In the above circumstances there is a slight difference in the figures of population as arrived at by an earlier sorting of the slips and as now determined by counting from the National Citizens' Register. This difference has been accen tuated by an order passed by me during the later count.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Diary, Uttar Pradesh-2020 (English)
    ST A TISTICAL DIAR STATISTICAL DIARY UTTAR PRADESH 2020 Y UTT AR PR ADESH 2020 Economic & Statistics Division Economic & Statistics Division State Planning Institute State Planning Institute Planning Department, Uttar Pradesh Planning Department, Uttar Pradesh website-http://updes.up.nic.in website-http://updes.up.nic.in STATISTICAL DIARY UTTAR PRADESH 2020 ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS DIVISION STATE PLANNING INSTITUTE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, UTTAR PRADESH http://updes.up.nic.in OFFICERS & STAFF ASSOCIATED WITH THE PUBLICATION 1. SHRI VIVEK Director Guidance and Supervision 1. SHRI VIKRAMADITYA PANDEY Jt. Director 2. DR(SMT) DIVYA SARIN MEHROTRA Jt. Director 3. SHRI JITENDRA YADAV Dy. Director 3. SMT POONAM Eco. & Stat. Officer 4. SHRI RAJBALI Addl. Stat. Officer (In-charge) Manuscript work 1. Dr. MANJU DIKSHIT Addl. Stat. Officer Scrutiny work 1. SHRI KAUSHLESH KR SHUKLA Addl. Stat. Officer Collection of Data from Local Departments 1. SMT REETA SHRIVASTAVA Addl. Stat. Officer 2. SHRI AWADESH BHARTI Addl. Stat. Officer 3. SHRI SATYENDRA PRASAD TIWARI Addl. Stat. Officer 4. SMT GEETANJALI Addl. Stat. Officer 5. SHRI KAUSHLESH KR SHUKLA Addl. Stat. Officer 6. SMT KIRAN KUMARI Addl. Stat. Officer 7. MS GAYTRI BALA GAUTAM Addl. Stat. Officer 8. SMT KIRAN GUPTA P. V. Operator Graph/Chart, Map & Cover Page Work 1. SHRI SHIV SHANKAR YADAV Chief Artist 2. SHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD MISHRA Senior Artist 3. SHRI SANJAY KUMAR Senior Artist Typing & Other Work 1. SMT NEELIMA TRIPATHI Junior Assistant 2. SMT MALTI Fourth Class CONTENTS S.No. Items Page 1. List of Chapters i 2. List of Tables ii-ix 3. Conversion Factors x 4. Map, Graph/Charts xi-xxiii 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Attendance Sheet Statelevel
    HMIS/MCTS State Level Training cum Review of Divison ‐ Allahabad, Chitrakootdham and Varanasi Training Dates : 18‐20 Dec. 2014 Participants List Sl. No. Division District Designation Name of Participant Moile NO. Email ID 1 Varanasi Varanasi Divisional PM Mr. Brijesh Mishra 8005192941 [email protected] 2 Varanasi Varanasi Div. Accounts Manager Mr. Sanjay Srivastava 8005193326 [email protected] 3 Varanasi Varanasi District Immunization Officer (DIO) Dr. B.N. Singh 9918902105 [email protected] 4 Varanasi Varanasi District Program Manager (DPM) Mr. Ripunjay Srivastava 8005193093 [email protected] 5 Varanasi Varanasi District Data Manager (DDM) Mr. Ritesh Kr. Srivastava 9307771956 [email protected] 6 Varanasi Varanasi District Asst. Research Office (ARO) Hari Bandhan Maurya [email protected] 7 Varanasi Varanasi HMIS Operator Pankaj Rai 9696898645 8 Varanasi Chandauli District Immunization Officer (DIO) Dr. H.R. Maurya 9648009462 [email protected] 9 Varanasi Chandauli District Program Manager (DPM) Dr. R.B. Yadav 8005193040 [email protected] 10 Varanasi Chandauli District Asst. Research Office (ARO) Vidyuta Prakash Singh 8005193255 [email protected] 11 Varanasi Chandauli HMIS Operator Nilratan 9889138764 [email protected] 12 Varanasi Ghazipur District Immunization Officer (DIO) Dr. S.K. Rai 9415624032 [email protected] 13 Varanasi Ghazipur District Program Manager (DPM) Mr. Satya Prakash 8005193051 [email protected] 14 Varanasi Ghazipur District Data Manager (DDM) Mohd. Azhar Khan 9451601062 [email protected] 15 Varanasi Ghazipur District Asst. Research Office (ARO) Dr. S.N. Chauhan 9415972968 [email protected] 16 Varanasi Ghazipur HMIS Operator Mr. Shiv Kumar Yadav 8808619132 [email protected] 17 Varanasi Jaunpur District Immunization Officer (DIO) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Class Wise Ulbs of Uttar Pradesh
    List of Class wise ULBs of Uttar Pradesh Classification Nos. Name of Town I Class 50 Moradabad, Meerut, Ghazia bad, Aligarh, Agra, Bareilly , Lucknow , Kanpur , Jhansi, Allahabad , (100,000 & above Population) Gorakhpur & Varanasi (all Nagar Nigam) Saharanpur, Muzaffarnagar, Sambhal, Chandausi, Rampur, Amroha, Hapur, Modinagar, Loni, Bulandshahr , Hathras, Mathura, Firozabad, Etah, Badaun, Pilibhit, Shahjahanpur, Lakhimpur, Sitapur, Hardoi , Unnao, Raebareli, Farrukkhabad, Etawah, Orai, Lalitpur, Banda, Fatehpur, Faizabad, Sultanpur, Bahraich, Gonda, Basti , Deoria, Maunath Bhanjan, Ballia, Jaunpur & Mirzapur (all Nagar Palika Parishad) II Class 56 Deoband, Gangoh, Shamli, Kairana, Khatauli, Kiratpur, Chandpur, Najibabad, Bijnor, Nagina, Sherkot, (50,000 - 99,999 Population) Hasanpur, Mawana, Baraut, Muradnagar, Pilkhuwa, Dadri, Sikandrabad, Jahangirabad, Khurja, Vrindavan, Sikohabad,Tundla, Kasganj, Mainpuri, Sahaswan, Ujhani, Beheri, Faridpur, Bisalpur, Tilhar, Gola Gokarannath, Laharpur, Shahabad, Gangaghat, Kannauj, Chhibramau, Auraiya, Konch, Jalaun, Mauranipur, Rath, Mahoba, Pratapgarh, Nawabganj, Tanda, Nanpara, Balrampur, Mubarakpur, Azamgarh, Ghazipur, Mughalsarai & Bhadohi (all Nagar Palika Parishad) Obra, Renukoot & Pipri (all Nagar Panchayat) III Class 167 Nakur, Kandhla, Afzalgarh, Seohara, Dhampur, Nehtaur, Noorpur, Thakurdwara, Bilari, Bahjoi, Tanda, Bilaspur, (20,000 - 49,999 Population) Suar, Milak, Bachhraon, Dhanaura, Sardhana, Bagpat, Garmukteshwer, Anupshahar, Gulathi, Siana, Dibai, Shikarpur, Atrauli, Khair, Sikandra
    [Show full text]
  • Annexure-V State/Circle Wise List of Post Offices Modernised/Upgraded
    State/Circle wise list of Post Offices modernised/upgraded for Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) Annexure-V Sl No. State/UT Circle Office Regional Office Divisional Office Name of Operational Post Office ATMs Pin 1 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA PRAKASAM Addanki SO 523201 2 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL KURNOOL Adoni H.O 518301 3 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VISAKHAPATNAM AMALAPURAM Amalapuram H.O 533201 4 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL ANANTAPUR Anantapur H.O 515001 5 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Machilipatnam Avanigadda H.O 521121 6 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA TENALI Bapatla H.O 522101 7 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Bhimavaram Bhimavaram H.O 534201 8 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA VIJAYAWADA Buckinghampet H.O 520002 9 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL TIRUPATI Chandragiri H.O 517101 10 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Prakasam Chirala H.O 523155 11 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL CHITTOOR Chittoor H.O 517001 12 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL CUDDAPAH Cuddapah H.O 516001 13 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM Dabagardens S.O 530020 14 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL HINDUPUR Dharmavaram H.O 515671 15 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA ELURU Eluru H.O 534001 16 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Gudivada Gudivada H.O 521301 17 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH Vijayawada Gudur Gudur H.O 524101 18 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL ANANTAPUR Guntakal H.O 515801 19 Andhra Pradesh ANDHRA PRADESH VIJAYAWADA
    [Show full text]
  • Item No. 01 Court No. 1 BEFORE THE
    Item No. 01 Court No. 1 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No. 116/2014 (M.A. No. 01/2021, M.A. No. 02/2021 & M.A. No. 03/2021) Meera Shukla Applicant Versus Municipal Corporation, Gorakhpur & Ors. Respondent(s) Date of hearing: 12.01.2021 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER Applicant: Ms. Katyayni, Advocate Respondent(s): Ms. Deep Shikha Bharti, Advocate for State of UP Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for CPCB Mr. Pradeep Misra and Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocates for UPPCB Mr. I.K. Kapila, Advocate for UP Jal Nigam Mr. Atul Veer Chopra, Advocate in MA No. 01/2021 Mr. Sumer Sodhi, Advocate in MA Nos. 02/2021 & 03/2021 ORDER 1. The issue for consideration is the remedial action for contamination of water bodies and ground water, specially Ramgarh Lake, Ami River, Rapti River and Rohani River in and around District Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. In the course of proceedings certain associated issues have also been taken up for consideration including industrial pollution, encroachments, enforcement of Solid Waste and Bio Medical Waste Rules to which further reference will be made in the later part of this order. 2. The matter has been pending for the last more than six years and was exhaustively reviewed vide order dated 23.08.2018. The Tribunal noted the allegation that Ramgarh Lake and the Ami, Rapti and 1 Rohani Rivers in and around District Gorakhpur were severely polluted on account of discharge of untreated sewage and industrial effluents.
    [Show full text]
  • Kannoj List of Benif..Xls
    LIST OF BENEFICIARIES State- Uttar Pradesh District - Kannoj Assessment Date - 03/01/2014 Block - Tahsil Chhibramau S. NAME OF AGEF/M FATHER'S BENEFICIARIES TYPE OF APPLIANCES MOBILE NO. BENEFICIARIES NAME ADDRESS DISABILITY PRESCRIBED NUMBER 1 HIMANSHU KUMAR 16 M RAMESH CHANDR GANESHIGANJ PO.CHIBRAMAU DIST.KANNOJ PPRP TD2C98 2 SATYPAL 23 M VIRENDR KUMAR HARKARANPUR PO.PREMPUR DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 3 SANJEEV SINGH 34 M VISESHWAR SINGH RANVIRPUR PO.PREMPUR DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 4 ANOKHALAL 40 M MANFHOOL KHEMKARAN PO.JARAUNA DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 5 MO.KHALID 18 M SAFHI GURUSAHAYGANJ DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 6 PAPPU CHAUHAN 32 M BUDH SINGH BAHADURPUR BIJGAON PO.BIJGAWAN DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 7 SUBASH 24 M SHRI RAM SANEHI GULRIYA PO.DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 8 ANTRAM 32 M NANURAM KUWARPUR KANAULI PO.NAUGAI DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 9 SATENDR 24 M SHRI VIJAY BAHADUR PATTI PO.SAKRAWA DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 10 SADAB KHAN 31 M FAIYAJ KHAN KAPOORPUR PO.GHAJIVA DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 11 MAIKU LAL 24 M SHRI DIWARI LAL GULRIYA PO.KHANDI DIST.KANNOJ PPRP TD2C98 12 DEEPAK KUMAR 10 M PRAMOD KUMAR SIKANDERPUR DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 13 SAILENDR KUMAR 36 M SHRI VED PRAKASH MOTINAGAR PO.SAKRAWA DIST.KANNOJ PPRP TD2C98 14 LALITA 18 F SATISH CHANDR JAFHRABAD CHHIBRAMAU DIST.KANNOJ PPRP TD2C98 15 SATYPAL 35 M SUKHLAL ARU NAGRIYA MO.ARU DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 16 CHANDRBHAN 30 M SHIVADHAR KPAPUR PO.TITIYA JALALPUR DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 17 VIJENDR KUMAR 30 M SHRI RAM RATOJIPUR PO.KHOTI DIST.KANNOJ B/L PPRP TD2C98 18 MUKESH KUMAR 30 M RAM KISHAN HAJIRPUR PO.TALGRAM DIST.KANNOJ SPAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Ganga Canal Command Area and Haidergarh Branch Environmental Setting & Environmental Baseline 118
    Draft Final Report of Lower Ganga Canal System and Public Disclosure Authorized Haidergarh Branch Public Disclosure Authorized REVISED Public Disclosure Authorized Submitted to: Project Activity Core Team (PACT) WALMI Bhawan, Utrethia, Telibagh, Lucknow – 226026 Submitted by: IRG Systems South Asia Pvt. Ltd. Lower Ground Floor, AADI Building, 2-Balbir Saxena Marg, Hauz Khas, Public Disclosure Authorized New Delhi – 110 016, INDIA Tel: +91-11-4597 4500 / 4597 Fax: +91-11-4175 9514 www.irgssa.com In association with Page | 1 Tetra Tech India Ltd. IRG Systems South Asia Pvt. Ltd. Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 16 1.0 Introduction & Background 16 1.1 Water Resource Development in Uttar Pradesh 16 1.2 Study Area & Project Activities 20 1.3 Need for the Social & Environmental Framework 24 1.4 Objectives 24 1.5 Scope of Work (SoW) 25 1.6 Approach & Methodology 25 1.7 Work Plan 28 1.8 Structure of the Report 29 CHAPTER 2: REGULATORY REVIEW AND GAP ANALYSIS 31 2.0 Introduction 31 2.1 Policy and regulatory framework to deal with water management, social and environmental safeguards 31 2.1.2 Regulatory framework to deal with water, environment and social Safeguards 31 2.1.3 Legislative Framework to Deal with Social Safeguards 32 2.2 Applicable Policy, Rules & Regulation to project interventions / activities 33 2.2.1 EIA Notification 33 2.3 Institutional Framework to deal with water, social and environmental safeguards 37 2.4 Institutional Gaps 39 CHAPTER 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE STATUS 40 3.0 Introduction 40 3.1 Socio-Economic Baseline
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Kannauj District Ashutosh
    P: ISSN NO.: 2394-0344 RNI No.UPBIL/2016/67980 VOL-3* ISSUE-10* (Part-1) January 2019 E: ISSN NO.: 2455-0817 Remarking An Analisation The Importance of Road Transportation in Regional Development –A Case study of Kannauj District Abstract Kannauj is one of the socio-economic and agriculturally developing districts of India. Eventhough, the rate of over all agricultural and regional development of the region is not as much, as it should be. The district has great historical importance and immense agricultural possibilities. Despite the region has good fertile soil, nearness to Kanpur and Lucknowand huge industrialization potential the region is still not developing fast. The only solution to this problem lies in better road connectivity between small villages, towns and cities and good maintenance of existing road network. Through this article, author will provide a proposed road network plan which will help in better connectivity and fast regional development of cities villages and towns in Kannauj district. The author will also proposed some new industrial regions which helps in overall regional development of the region. Keywords: Metalled Roads, Unmetalled Road, Road Density, National Highway State Highway. Introduction Road transport means transport of goods and personnel from one place to the other through roads.There are many advantages of road transports in comparison to other means of transport. The investment required in road transport is very less compared to other modes of transport such as railways and air transport. The major advantage of road transport is that it can enable door-to-door delivery of goods and materials Ashutosh Agnihotri and can provide very cost-effective means of cartage loading and PGT Teacher, unloading.
    [Show full text]