DOCSLIB.ORG

Brussels, 22.3.2021 SWD(2020) 330 Final/2 CORRIGENDUM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brussels, 22.3.2021 SWD(2020) 330 Final/2 CORRIGENDUM Brussels, 22.3.2021 SWD(2020) 330 final/2 CORRIGENDUM: This document corrects document SWD(2020) 330 final of 30.11.2020 Modification of figure 6 on page 21 The text shall read as follows: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Overview of natural and man-made disaster risks the European Union may face EN EN Table of contents ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF FIGURES AND BOXES ...................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 8 2. PROTECTING THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC FROM DISASTERS: THE EU POLICY LANDSCAPE....................................................................................................................................... 10 3. THE CHANGING RISK LANDSCAPE IN EUROPE ............................................................ 16 3.1. Lessons from the past ............................................................................................................ 16 3.1.1. Recent disasters in the EU ............................................................................................. 16 3.1.2. Use of EU solidarity instruments for assistance with disasters ..................................... 17 3.1.3. The toll of past disasters ................................................................................................ 23 3.2. Risk drivers............................................................................................................................ 28 3.2.1. Climate change .............................................................................................................. 29 3.2.2. Urbanisation .................................................................................................................. 33 3.2.3. Environmental degradation ........................................................................................... 40 3.2.4. The changing security landscape ................................................................................... 41 3.2.5. Technological developments ......................................................................................... 47 4. UNDERSTANDING DISASTER RISKS IN THE EU: PROGRESS, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS ....................................................................................................................................... 52 4.1. National risk assessments ...................................................................................................... 52 4.2. The data challenge ................................................................................................................. 56 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE EU .......................................................................................................................................... 59 ANNEX 1. THE OVERVIEW OF SELECTED DISASTER RISKS IN THE EU ........................ 66 1 ABBREVIATIONS ATM Automated teller machine CAP Common agricultural policy CBRN Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear DALY Disability-adjusted life year DRMKC European Commission Disaster Risk Management Knowledge Centre EAFRD European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development ECDC European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECI European critical infrastructure ECMWF European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ECURIE European Community Urgent Radiological Information Exchange system EDO European Drought Observatory EEA European Environment Agency or European Economic Area EEAS European External Action Service EFAS European Flood Awareness System EFFIS European Forest Fire Information System EFSA European Food Safety Authority EIOPA European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority EMV Europay, Mastercard, Visa ENISA European Union Agency for Cybersecurity ENSREG European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group EPCIP European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection ERCC Emergency Response Coordination Centre ERNCIP European Reference Network for Critical Infrastructure Protection ESA European Space Agency ESIF European Structural and Investment Funds EU European Union EUMETSAT European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites EUR Euro EWRS Early Warning and Response System FD Floods Directive FRMP Flood risk management plan GAR Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction GDO GLOBAL Drought Observatory GDP Gross domestic product GHG Greenhouse gas GloFas Global Flood Awareness System GNI Gross national income GWIS Global Wildfire Information System HIV Human immunodeficiency viruses IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ICT Information and communication technologies iOCTA Internet organised crime threat assessment IBPES Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2 IPCR EU Integrated Political Crisis Response ISIS Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant JRC Joint Research Centre of the European Commission LNG Liquefied natural gas LPG Liquefied petroleum gas MERS Middle East respiratory syndrome NATECH Natural hazard triggered technological accident NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NDC Nationally Determined Contribution under the Paris Agreement NFC Near Field Communication NRA National risk assessment OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PESETA Projection of economic impacts of climate change in sectors of the European Union based on bottom-up analysis RAN Radicalisation awareness network RBMP River basin management plan RCP Representative concentration pathway SARS Severe acute respiratory syndrome SOMA Observatory for Social Media Analysis SWD European Commission staff working document UAV Unmanned aerial vehicle UCPM Union Civil Protection Mechanism UK United Kingdom UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees WFD Water framework Directive WHO World Health Organisation WISC Windstorm Information Service 3 LIST OF FIGURES AND BOXES Figure 1. Cohesion policy funding for risk prevention and management in 2014-2020 Figure 2. Maximum value of the daily maximum temperature (°C) and daily averaged temperature anomalies (°C) compared with the long-term mean, over 25-29 June 2019. Figure 3. Requests for UCPM assistance from EU Member States / UCPM participating states by type of disaster, 2007-2019 Figure 4. Requests for UCPM assistance by EU Member State / UCPM participating state, 2007-2019 Figure 5. Total direct damage incurred in disasters, as declared in applications to the EU Solidarity Fund, 2002-2019 Figure 6. EU Solidarity Fund assistance granted, breakdown by disaster type and year, 2002- 2019 Figure 7. EU Solidarity Fund assistance granted by country, 2002-2019 Figure 8. Mortality from infectious and parasitic diseases, EU-28, 1980-2015 Figure 9. Fatalities caused by selected natural hazards, EU-28, 1980-2017 Figure 10. Fatalities in extreme weather and climate-related events, 1980-2017 Figure 11. Fatalities in terrorist attacks in the EU-28, 2006-2019 Figure 12. Economic losses from disasters caused by natural hazards, EU-28, 1980-2017 Figure 13. Economic losses from disasters caused by natural hazards, by year, EU-28, 1980- 2017 Figure 14. Impacts of extreme weather and climate-related events in the EU, 1980-2017 Figure 15. Area of land in Natura 2000 sites burnt, in hectares, 2009-2018 Figure 16. Global GHG emissions and global mean temperature change Figure 17. Change in population and built-up areas, 1975-2015 per region of the world Figure 18. Pattern of net land take in Europe between 2000-2018 (km2) Figure 19. Change per decade in the share of sealed soil in core cities Figure 20. Surface area with a low capacity to control flooding in cities Figure 21. The most common risks in National Risk Assessments in 2015 and 2018 reporting cycles Box 1. Boosting the EU’s capacity to deal with disasters: the 2019 reform of UCPM Box 2. The EU Solidarity Fund: findings from the 2019 evaluation Box 3. Cultural heritage and disasters: the 2019 floods in Venice Box 4. New and emerging risks Box 5. Climate change and its impacts: insights from the IPCC special reports Box 6. Projected climate change impacts in Europe: PESETA IV research results Box 7. Urban heat islands Box 8. The EU Copernicus programme and disaster risk management Box 9. Evolving thinking on disaster risks: GAR 2019 Box 10. Climate change as a driver of disaster risk in national risk assessments Box 11. Low-probability risks with a high impact – the concept Box 12. The DRMKC Risk Data Hub Box 13. European institutions call for a strengthening of the EU’s crisis management system 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Commission staff working document is the second edition of an overview of the natural and man-made disaster risks that the EU may face, prepared under EU legislation on civil protection. The aim of the overview is to capture the trends in the ever-evolving disaster risk landscape, discuss the major drivers shaping it, take a closer look at 12 selected disaster risks of particular relevance for Europe and to assess the implications of developments in disaster risks for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Euro Aggregate
    Investment Highlights 2Q 2021 Euro Aggregate Performance Review Global Bond and Currency Returns Euro Aggregate portfolios outperformed their benchmarks Country 9 7.1 in 2Q21: 6 3.1 Overweight exposures to corporate bonds and hard 3 2.2 2.5 0.4 1.1 1.3 currency EM bonds were positive. 0 -0.6 -0.6 -0.4 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 Total Returns (%) Total -3 An opportunistic allocation to US and Australian Govt Year Bond 7–10 France Italy Germany Spain Mexico Poland Japan UK China* Australia US Indonesia*S. Africa* duration added to returns. Sector A flattening of global yield curves was beneficial. 3.0 EU UK US EM Tactical positioning in inflation-linked bonds added 1.7 1.9 1.7 2.0 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.0 to returns. 1.0 0.6 Currency positioning was a positive, driven by an 0.0 overweight position in the Hungarian forint. Excess Returns (%) -0.3 -1.0 Euro Euro UK UK US US US US USD EM EM Corp HY Corp HY Corp MBS HY TIPS Sovereign Corp Portfolio Activity Currency 6 Reduced eurozone duration by cutting exposure 3.4 4.1 4 2.5 2.6 to longer-dated French government bonds early 2 0.5 0.9 1.4 in the quarter. 0 -2 -0.8 -0.8 -0.3 Reduced US and UK duration during the quarter -1.8 -1.3 -1.2 -4 -2.4 NOKAUD JPY INR GBP USD KRW CAD SEK CNY PLN MXN ZAR RUB as yields declined.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union, 2020
    08 Malone article.qxp_Admin 69-1 22/02/2021 15:06 Page 97 Administration, vol. 69, no. 1 (2021), pp. 97–109 doi: 10.2478/admin-2021-0008 European Union, 2020 Margaret Mary Malone Institute of Public Administration, Ireland The year was defined by the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, which unleashed a public health crisis and an associated economic crisis unlike anything experienced in modern times in Europe and beyond. The disease triggered a combined negative supply and demand shock of unprecedented intensity and the EU entered unchartered territory. National and regional serial lockdowns were introduced in a bid to curb the spread of Covid-19 and avoid health systems becoming overwhelmed. In a show of solidarity commensurate with the unfolding economic emergency, EU member states agreed a financial stimulus package of some €1.8 trillion to rebuild the battered EU economy. The package comprised the EU’s budget, or Multi- annual Financial Framework (MFF), for the period 2021–7 plus a temporary novel recovery instrument, Next Generation EU (NGEU). Funds for NGEU are to be borrowed, exceptionally, by the European Commission on the international capital markets. This decision was a landmark departure for the EU. Developments in the institutions of the EU On 1 January Croatia began its presidency of the Council of the EU for six months. A member state since July 2013, this was the first time Croatia had presided over the Council. Its priorities were driven by an unwittingly prescient motto, ‘A strong Europe in a world of challenges’. On 1 July Germany took over the Council presidency with 97 08 Malone article.qxp_Admin 69-1 22/02/2021 15:06 Page 98 98 MARGARET MARY MALONE the challenge of combatting the economic, social and budgetary implications of Covid-19 front and centre.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Proposes COVID-19 Recovery Plan and [Further] Adjusted Work Programme
    Tax Policy Bulletin from Global Tax Policy EU proposes COVID-19 Recovery Plan and [further] adjusted Work Programme June 29, 2020 In brief The European Commission has proposed a detailed COVID-19 Recovery Plan which includes more taxes going directly to the European Union. In the short term, the European Union will borrow to finance Member State investment in what is effectively the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) for 2021- 2027. The framework will be discussed in the coming months and, if approved, put in place this year. There would be some knock-on effects on work previously planned for 2020 (as discussed in our earlier Bulletin of 7 May 2020), including a number of tax proposals. This Bulletin focuses on • the fairly immediate introduction of ‘green’ levies: an EU-wide emissions trading levy, non-recycled plastic packaging waste charge and a carbon border adjustment mechanism; • a EU single market tax on the 70,000 large companies with revenues over EUR 750m; • a digital tax in the event of the OECD-led digitalisation/ globalisation project not producing a suitable consensus among the near 140 members of the Inclusive Framework; • the delivery of planned 2020 projects, including an “Action Plan to fight tax evasion and to make taxation simple and easy” and a plan on “Business Taxation for the 21st century.“ In detail COVID-19 recovery fund and structuring repayments The European Council endorsed crisis funding to provide a safety net for workers, businesses and Member State governments of EUR 540bn on April 23, 2020. The European Commission has now proposed an emergency European recovery instrument, ‘Next Generation EU,’ amounting to a further EUR 750bn.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN LETTER to EU Heads of State on Funding the Fight to End Violence Against Women and Girls
    OPEN LETTER To EU Heads of State on funding the fight to end violence against women and girls Brussels, 23 September 2020 Dear President of the European Council, Charles Michel Dear Head of Presidency of the Council, Chancellor Angela Merkel Dear EU Heads of State Dear Members of the European Parliament We, the undersigned, members of the European Coalition to end violence against women and girls consisting of civil society organisations, networks and trade unions fighting for gender equality and the rights of women and girls to live free from violence, are writing to you regarding the MFF 2021-2027 and Next Generation EU (NGEU). We urge all EU decision-makers to demonstrate their political leadership and commitment to protecting gender equality, women’s and girls’ rights, and eliminating violence against women and girls in all of its activities through increased funds to the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme. We are pleased about the recent decision by the European Commission to reverse the 20% cuts of the budget to the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme, which is now proposed at €638 million (current prices). These commitments were further welcomed by the European Council following the July 2020 Special Meeting, who supported the Commission’s 2018 proposed amount of €841 million (2018 prices) to the Justice, Rights and Values Fund. In light of the European Parliament’s vote to withhold its consent for the MFF on 23 July 2020, we urge EU decision-makers to swiftly come to an ambitious agreement and meet the Parliament’s demands for targeted increases to flagship programmes, including tripling the amount allocated to the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme to €1.83 billion (current prices).
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Issues to Watch in 2021
    ISSN 2600-268X Ten issues to watch in 2021 IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Étienne Bassot Members' Research Service PE 659.436 – January 2021 EN This EPRS publication seeks to offer insights and put into context ten key issues and policy areas that are likely to feature prominently on the political agenda of the European Union in 2021. It has been compiled and edited by Isabelle Gaudeul-Ehrhart of the Members' Research Service, based on contributions from the following policy analysts: Marie-Laure Augère and Anna Caprile (Food for all? Food for thought), Denise Chircop and Magdalena Pasikowska-Schnass (Culture in crisis?), Costica Dumbrava (A new procedure to manage Europe's borders), Gregor Erbach (A digital boost for the circular economy), Silvia Kotanidis (Conference on the Future of Europe, in the introduction), Elena Lazarou (A new US President in the White House), Marianna Pari (The EU recovery plan: Turning crisis into opportunity?), Jakub Przetacznik and Nicole Scholz (The vaccine race for health safety), Ros Shreeves and Martina Prpic (Re-invigorating the fight against inequality?), Branislav Staniček (Turkey and stormy waters in the eastern Mediterranean) and Marcin Szczepanski (Critical raw materials for Europe). The cover image was produced by Samy Chahri. Further details of the progress of on-going EU legislative proposals, including all those mentioned in this document, are available in the European Parliament's Legislative Train Schedule, at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/ LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translations: DE, FR Manuscript completed in January 2021. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Recommendations from the Atlantic Storm Exercise
    BIOSECURITY AND BIOTERRORISM: BIODEFENSE STRATEGY, PRACTICE, AND SCIENCE Volume 3, Number 3, 2005 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. After-Action Report Navigating the Storm: Report and Recommendations from the Atlantic Storm Exercise BRADLEY T. SMITH, THOMAS V. INGLESBY, ESTHER BRIMMER, LUCIANA BORIO, CRYSTAL FRANCO, GIGI KWIK GRONVALL, BRADLEY KRAMER, BETH MALDIN, JENNIFER B. NUZZO, ARI SCHULER, SCOTT STERN, DONALD A. HENDERSON, RANDALL J. LARSEN, DANIEL S. HAMILTON, and TARA O’TOOLE Atlantic Storm was a tabletop exercise simulating a series of bioterrorism attacks on the transatlantic community. The exercise occurred on January 14, 2005, in Washington, DC, and was organized and convened by the Center for Biosecurity of UPMC, the Center for Transatlantic Relations of Johns Hopkins University, and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network. Atlantic Storm portrayed a summit meeting of presidents, prime ministers, and other international leaders from both sides of the At- lantic Ocean in which they responded to a campaign of bioterrorist attacks in several countries. The summit principals, who were all current or former senior government leaders, were challenged to address issues such as attaining situational awareness in the wake of a bioattack, coping with scarcity of critical medical resources such as vaccine, deciding how to manage the movement of people across borders, and communicating with their publics. Atlantic Storm illustrated that much might be done in advance to minimize the illness and death, as well as the social, economic, and political disruption, that could be caused by an international epidemic, be it natural or the result of a bioterrorist attack. These lessons are especially timely given the growing concerns over the possibility of an avian in- fluenza pandemic that would require an international response.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Between the Lines of Council Agreement on the MFF and Next Generation EU Jorge Núñez Ferrer
    No 2020-18 / July 2020 Reading between the lines of Council agreement on the MFF and Next Generation EU Jorge Núñez Ferrer Abstract The recent agreement on the EU budget is an unprecedented and historic achievement for the European Union. It has broken a taboo and advanced the integration process. We all saw that the negotiations were arduous, but given the magnitude of the challenge facing the heads of state and government, it would have been naïve to expect otherwise. It is virtually impossible to find a comparable agreement between numerous countries in any other part of the world; by this measure alone it is impressive. Having said that, what has been agreed is complex and bewildering to many. While attention has focused on the Next Generation EU, the agreement also includes the ‘normal’ multiannual financial framework (MFF) 2021-27. Comments to the effect that the EU has deleted all funding for health, or much of the research budget, are based on the Next Generation EU ‘temporary’ measure and not on the underlying MFF. This paper aims to present a brief rundown of the actual changes in numbers and reflect on the meaning of the agreement. Jorge Núñez Ferrer is a Senior Research Fellow at CEPS. CEPS Policy Insights offer analyses of a wide range of key policy questions facing Europe. As an institution, CEPS takes no position on questions of European policy. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the author in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which he is associated. Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (www.ceps.eu) © CEPS 2020 CEPS ▪ Place du Congrès 1 ▪ B-1000 Brussels ▪ Tel: (32.2) 229.39.11 ▪ www.ceps.eu 2 | JORGE NÚÑEZ FERRER In a nutshell, the major decisions taken are the following: a) The level of grants in Next Generation EU was cut from €500 billion to €390 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Evermore Global Value Fund Portfolio Commentary: 2Nd Quarter 2021
    Evermore Global Value Fund Portfolio Commentary: 2nd Quarter 2021 1 | P a g e Dear Shareholder, Global markets continued their positive gains in the second quarter. In the U.S., despite continued investor concerns about rising inflation rates and after impressive first quarter GDP growth of 6.4%, the S&P 500 hit an all-time high in June. And, with the support of strong corporate earnings reports and a decline in COVID- 19 cases, European markets also had a solid quarter. The Delta variant has renewed concerns about the prolonged impact the pandemic may continue to have in coming quarters. The good news for individuals who have been vaccinated is that the data shows that an overwhelming percentage of Delta variant cases, hospitalizations and deaths have been associated with unvaccinated individuals. Thus, the push to ramp up vaccinations in the U.S. and abroad continues. From our perspective, the news flow from around the world has been more positive than anytime over the last few years. Growth is picking up in Asia, in Europe and here in the U.S. It turns out there really is pent up demand across many sectors and industries. The confluence of additional stimulus checks for individuals, massive economic stimulus, and extremely low interest rates has created an environment for explosive growth around the globe. As we speak with corporate leaders, key regional investment banking firms as well as families and individuals that control companies, we have seen a resurgence of optimism about the future despite concerns about a new wave of COVID infections from the Delta variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Next Generation EU
    LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series Assessing Next Generation EU Lorenzo Codogno & Paul van den Noord LEQS Paper No. 166/2020 February 2021 Editorial Board Dr Vassilis Monastiriotis Dr Cristóbal Garibay-Petersen Dr Spyros Economides Dr Bernardo Rangoni Mr Toon Van Overbeke All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the LSE. © Lorenzo Codogno & Paul van den Noord Assessing Next Generation EU Lorenzo Codogno* & Paul van den Noord** Abstract The unprecedented fiscal package adopted by the European Council in the summer of 2020 ―dubbed Next Generation EU―is vital for the recovery of the euro area from the pandemic shock. However, there are risks that targets will not be met and that it may prove difficult to muster the same degree of European ‘solidarity’ in the future. Computations with a stylised macroeconomic model indicate that an alternative approach, with ex ante risk sharing through the creation of a Eurobond and permanent fiscal capacity at the centre, would be at least as powerful, yet it would be more sustainable, automatic and timely. Keywords: Fiscal Policy, Business fluctuations, Safe sovereign assests, Fiscal capacity JEL Classification: E32, E63, F33 * London School of Economics and Political Science Email: [email protected] ** Amstedam School of Economics Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forex Medium-Term Outlook
    Forex Medium-Term Outlook June 30, 2021 Overview of Outlook The June USD/JPY trend once again reflected conspicuous JPY weakness. While USD has clearly been depreciating since April, JPY has remained weak too. Spot transaction volumes are also small, revealing the sparse interest in JPY (or rather in Japan). While Europe and the U.S. take strides toward economic and social normalization against the backdrop of high vaccination rates, Japan is alone in aimlessly continuing to impose movement restrictions with no sense of progress. The Fed has already prepared the ground for quantitative easing (QE) tapering and is seen as certain to begin tapering by the end of the year. If things progress smoothly, rate hikes may begin to be discussed by the end of the year. By fall, Japan too is expected to have achieved vaccination rates similar to current rates in the U.S. and Europe. However, by then, the markets will have shifted their focus from vaccination rates to monetary policy gaps. USD depreciation during April-June has been nothing more than a correction warranted by the rapid pace of USD appreciation during January-March and, overall, the correction has been within the scope of what one would expect. Comparing stats at the end of June vs. the beginning of the year, U.S. 10-year interest rates have increased by +60bps, while USD’s nominal effective interest rate (NEER) has risen by +1.0%. This report’s prediction of a mutually-inspired increase in U.S. interest rates and USD, therefore, remains unshaken. One thing that is of concern are the setbacks recently suffered by some of the most vaccinated countries, such as the UK and Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Storm – a Transatlantic Bioterrorism Exercise
    ATLANTIC STORM –– A TRANSATLANTIC BIOTERRORISM EXERCISE Atlantic Storm was a ministerial table-top exercise convened in Washington, DC, on January 14, 2005. It was created and presented by the Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the Center for Transatlantic Relations of Johns Hopkins University, and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network and was funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and the Nuclear Threat Initiative. The exercise was held in real-time using the world’s current geopolitical context as a backdrop, and used a fictitious scenario designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack. The transatlantic leaders at the mock summit were played by current and former officials from each country or organization represented at the table: Prime Minister of Canada Prime Minister of Poland Played by Barbara McDougall Played by Jerzy Buzek Advisor, Aird & Berlis Member of the European Parliament Former Foreign Minister of Canada Former Prime Minister of Poland President of the European Commission Prime Minister of Sweden Played by Erika Mann Played by Jan Eliasson Member of the European Parliament Ambassador of Sweden to the U.S. Former Undersecretary General for Humanitarian Affairs at Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany the United Nations Played by Werner Hoyer Member of the Bundestag President of the United States Foreign Policy Spokesman, FDP Played by Madeleine Albright Former Deputy Minister of
    [Show full text]
  • A Sea of Change: Europe's Future in the Atlantic Realm
    ea sac A sea of change: Europe’s future in the Atlantic realm EASAC policy report 42 June 2021 ISBN: 978-3-8047-4262-8 This report can be found at www.easac.eu Science Advice for the Benefit of Europe EASAC EASAC – the European Academies' Science Advisory Council – is formed by the national science academies of the EU Member States to enable them to collaborate with each other in giving advice to European policy-makers. It thus provides a means for the collective voice of European science to be heard. EASAC was founded in 2001 at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Its mission reflects the view of academies that science is central to many aspects of modern life and that an appreciation of the scientific dimension is a pre-requisite to wise policy-making. This view already underpins the work of many academies at national level. With the growing importance of the European Union as an arena for policy, academies recognise that the scope of their advisory functions needs to extend beyond the national to cover also the European level. Here it is often the case that a trans-European grouping can be more effective than a body from a single country. The academies of Europe have therefore formed EASAC so that they can speak with a common voice with the goal of building science into policy at EU level. Through EASAC, the academies work together to provide independent, expert, evidence-based advice about the scientific aspects of public policy to those who make or influence policy within the European institutions.
    [Show full text]