DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 2: Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 2: Appendices How can local authorities stimulate & support behavioural change in response to climate change? A report for Hampshire County Council undertaken as part of the ESPACE project September 2004 – May 2005 Volume 2: Appendices Primary authors: Alexander, Ballard & Associates: 05600 433801 / 01672 520561 [email protected] Research undertaken in association with Rosslyn Research Ltd : 020 7328 8823; [email protected] How can local authorities stimulate & support behavioural change in response to climate change? A report for Hampshire County Council as part of the ESPACE project, July 2005 Alexander, Ballard & Associates with Rosslyn Research Ltd How can local authorities stimulate & support behavioural change in response to climate change? List of Appendices in Volume 2 A. Scoping interviews with Hampshire County Council staff B. Stakeholder interviews with local opinion leaders C. Interviews with ESPACE partners D. Literature review: Moving to action on climate change E. Case studies: Learning in detail from diverse initiatives F. Analysis of selected areas for possible action a) Education b) Farming c) Construction d) Coastal impacts e) Biodiversity f) Transport g) Domestic energy saving G. Focused stakeholder interviews: Education H. Focused stakeholder interviews: Farming I. Focused stakeholder interviews: Construction J. Focused stakeholder interviews: Coastal Areas K. Project terms of reference L. Project Plan M. About the authors of this report A report for Hampshire County Council as part of the ESPACE project, July 2005 Alexander, Ballard & Associates with Rosslyn Research Ltd How can local authorities stimulate & support behavioural change in response to climate change? A report for Hampshire County Council as part of the ESPACE project, July 2005 Alexander, Ballard & Associates with Rosslyn Research Ltd Appendix A Summary of initial scoping interviews Contents: 1. Purpose of scoping interviews .............................................................................................................3 2. Methodology and questions asked .......................................................................................................3 3. List of people interviewed....................................................................................................................4 4. What we learned ..................................................................................................................................4 4.1 How did interviewees became involved in climate change?.........................................................4 4.2 How do interviewees see their role on climate change? ...............................................................4 4.3 Interviewees’ interest in and hopes from this project....................................................................6 4.4 Other processes and initiatives, contacts.......................................................................................7 4.5 Any parameters or principles that the project should respect .......................................................7 4.6 How did interviewees see their role in awakening / supporting stakeholder participation?..........7 4.7 Ideas of what works / doesn’t work ..............................................................................................8 4.8 Other comments from interviewee................................................................................................8 5. Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................10 Attachment 1: Letter sent to participants in scoping interviews .......................................................11 Attachment 2 – List of people interviewed.......................................................................................13 © Alexander Ballard & Associates / Hampshire County Council & ESPACE, 2005 Appendix A, Page 1 of 14 Summary of initial scoping interviews © Alexander Ballard & Associates / Hampshire County Council & ESPACE, 2005 Appendix A, Page 2 of 14 Summary of initial scoping interviews 1. Purpose of scoping interviews Before the research phase of the project, we conducted 12 initial scoping interviews with Hampshire County Council members and officers (one of whom actually worked for the South East Regional Assembly) who were seen as likely to have an opinion on how the project might best serve the Council and the people of Hampshire. We used these interviews for a variety of purposes, including to identify initiatives and people that should be included in stakeholder interviews in Phase 2, to identify areas that might be helpful to HCC officers involved in this area for us to examine in Phase 4, provided that this can be done in a way consistent with the brief for the project, to identify other initiatives taking place in the county that we should be aware of and to identify what people in key roles hoped for from this project. We were also looking to understand how key officers currently see the challenge and the role of HCC. We were also seeking to check out whether the county had the necessary level of understanding of the issues to be able to lead effectively in this area. 2. Methodology and questions asked We wished to minimise the well-known power dynamic that emerges when one party (the interviewer) takes control of the agenda and does not allow deviation from it. For this reason, the interviews were carried out in a semi-structured manner, with the intention of ensuring that certain key generally open questions were asked, while also allowing a free flow of conversation and the building of ideas together and opening possibilities for the interviewee to raise items that we might not previously seen as relevant. Four of the interviews were carried out face to face. While we would have preferred all to have been done in this way, there was simply not enough time for this to be possible and the other conversations were by telephone. The conversations were relatively lengthy, with even senior interviewees being prepared to give generously of their time. We greatly enjoyed them and came to appreciate the quality of HCC’s people and of their work in this area. We understand that the interviewees generally enjoyed the conversations too, and we are very pleased about this. We sought to: • Understand the interviewee’s role and their potential interest in this project • Find out how they became involved in, and see your role on, climate change • Discover what they hope for from this project … • … and how the project might fit into other processes • Identify other initiatives (past, present, future) of which we should be aware • Identify any parameters or principles that the interviewee thinks should be observed as we work • Ask for advice re: stakeholders, possible case studies, other people to talk to (now or later), existing research (internal or external), desk research data or sources, etc. • Identify how the interviewee currently sees HCC’s role in awakening and supporting stakeholder participation • Find out what the interviewee has learned about what works, doesn’t work in practice • Find out how he or she would like to be kept in touch. A short note was made during the interview, which was later typed up. We did not discover any information that we would regard as confidential, and yet we generally © Alexander Ballard & Associates / Hampshire County Council & ESPACE, 2005 Appendix A, Page 3 of 14 Summary of initial scoping interviews (with few exceptions) prefer not to attribute comments at this stage for the conversations were relatively open. We can always seek permission if attribution seems appropriate. 3. List of people interviewed Attachment 2 is a list of the 12 people that we interviewed. We identified these from discussions with representatives of the Environment Department as being people who would be likely to have an opinion on how the project might best serve the Council and the people of Hampshire. 4. What we learned Here is a selection of what interviewees said on specific questions. Note that interviewees’ comments are not always presented in the same order and that it is not therefore possible to connect a comment with any particular interviewee. 4.1 How did interviewees became involved in climate change? Some interviewees have clearly been interested in this subject for a long time, others had become involved through their role. About half mentioned a personal interest that preceded their professional involvement (though this might have been true of a higher proportion). We were not able to identify any difference between those who became involved through their role and those who were personally interested in terms of their attitudes to their work on climate change. a) In November 1999 I attended the Royal Geographical Society Conference on climate change. Until that time I hadn’t thought about it. Michael Meacher was brilliant. I am attracted by new challenges; this is a serious challenge. It is not a question of if but of when: timescales extend far into future. However my first love was waste – I could see that in Hampshire’s geology our behaviour simply must be changed. b) I have high awareness of climate change and its implications within my role. On the other hand, current pressures have been such that I have not been able to devote as much time to climate change during the process as I would have liked. c) Through my role (several said this). d) I have had a long standing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manhood Peninsula Destination Management Plan 2018-2023 Produced by the Sustainable Tourism on the Manhood Peninsula (STOMP) Project
    Manhood Peninsula Destination Management Plan 2018-2023 Produced by the Sustainable Tourism on the Manhood Peninsula (STOMP) Project Project partly funded by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development: Europe investing in rural areas Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Purpose of this document........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Aims of the STOMP Project......................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Sustainable Tourism........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 What is sustainable tourism?.................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Why does the Manhood Peninsula need a sustainable tourism strategy?.................................................. 3 2.3 Developing and supporting Sense of Place and Memorable Experiences.................................................. 3 2.4 How was the strategy developed?.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 126. South Coast Plain Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 126. South Coast Plain Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 126. South Coast Plain Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhood Peninsula
    Overall Character THE WEST SUSSEX LANDSCAPE Land Management Guidelines This Character Area lies in the south west of the county, to the south of Chichester, between the harbours of Chichester and Pagham. A large part of this area has been reclaimed from the sea, and remains below the current high spring tide level. It is mainly flat open landscape, dominated by highly productive large arable fields and modern farm buildings and characterised by a decline in tree and hedgerow cover and loss of grassland habitats. Habitation is predominantly in scattered small traditional settlements and larger suburban villages. Areas of unimproved grassland still exist along the edges of streams and rifes which are often immediately bordered by reed beds. Sheet SC2 In contrast, some parts have a patchwork of smaller enclosed pastures and horse paddocks which have a more intimate character. Parkland tree belts remaining from former estates are an occasional feature and there are significant clusters of glasshouses in the Sidlesham area. Manhood Key Characteristics G Large scale arable farming with large, often hedgeless fields. G Mainly low-lying flat landform. G Extensive farms with both traditional and modern farm buildings and silos. Peninsula G Pockets of small enclosed pasture fields and horse paddocks. G Industry in the countryside mainly associated with horticulture, resulting in large expanses of South Coast Plain G Linear villages. glasshouses. G G Narrow, right-angled or winding lanes. Scattered vernacular villages with mixed building materials, often flint, brick, half timber and stone, often with sprawling modern fringes. G Occasional views from the land of the water, or of yacht masts.
    [Show full text]
  • Earnley Conservation Area Character Appraisal & Management Proposals
    EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS Originally published September 2006 with updated appendices March 2012 Approved by Cabinet: 7 May 2013 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS On the 5th September 2006 Chichester District Council approved this document as planning guidance and therefore it will be a material consideration in the determination of relevant planning applications. Cover: Map of Earnley 1875 This document has been written and illustrated on behalf of Chichester District Council by: The Conservation Studio 1 Querns Lane Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 1RL Telephone: 01285 642428 email: [email protected] PART 1 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1 INTRODUCTION 2 LOCATION AND LANDSCAPE SETTING 2.1 Location 2.2 Topography 2.3 Relationship of the conservation area to its surroundings 2.4 Geology 2.5 Biodiversity 3 HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHAEOLOGY 3.1 Historic development 3.2 Surviving historic features 3.3 Archaeology 4 SPATIAL ANALYSIS 4.1 Character areas 4.2 Plan form, building types and boundaries 4.3 Open spaces, trees and views 5 DEFINITION OF THE SPECIAL INTEREST OF THE CONSERVATION AREA 5.1 Activities and uses 5.2 Listed buildings 5.3 Positive buildings 5.4 Building materials and colours 5.5 Public realm 6 ISSUES PART 2 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS 1 BACKGROUND 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 MONITORING AND REVIEW 4 CONTACT DETAILS APPENDICES Appendix 1 Legislative background Appendix 2 Community involvement Appendix 3 Good Practice Guidance Appendix 4 Draft Local List Criteria Appendix 5 Bibliography PART 1 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1 INTRODUCTION This document has been produced for Chichester The Management Proposals make the following District Council following consultation with the local recommendations: community.
    [Show full text]
  • Selsey Neighbourhood Plan
    SELSEY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2017 ANNEX A – HISTORY, DESIGN AND GUIDANCE – BACKGROUND EVIDENCE WWW.SELSEYTOWNCOUNCIL.GOV.UK TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 LOCALISM AND COMMUNITY NEED 3 SELSEY GROWTH 1086 - 2013 SELSEY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2016 4 DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES 6 SELSEY 2029 8 ENVIRONMENT AND COUNTRYSIDE SUSTAINABILITY 10 11 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - CLIMATE 13 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - ENERGY 15 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE 17 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - TRANSPORT 20 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY 21 SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY DESIGN GUIDANCE 27 CONTEXT AND CHARACTER 29 DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS 31 LOCAL DESIGN AND PLANNING GUIDANCE 43 NON-PLANNING OBJECTIVES APPENDICES 44 APPENDIX I - SELSEY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS 47 APPENDIX II - CONSULTATIONS 48 REFERENCES 1 INTRODUCTION The Localism Bill introduced by Eric Pickles MP in 2011 devolved powers previously held by central government to local authorities. Local communities now have a greater influence over the way their neighbourhoods are developed, placing community need at its heart, along with co-operation with developers and local authorities. In addition to a number of policy changes, one of the most significant is the way the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is applied through the involvement of local communities and a presumption in favour of sustainable developments in line with community need. The removal of the regional tier with the abolition of regional spatial strategies (RSS), local planning policy has become essential. Communities defined by parish or geography have been encouraged to develop their own neighbourhood plans, to provide an informed and contextual framework to determine future development, whilst conforming to strategic and local policies. Through the development of neighbourhood plans, it is essential to give the community every opportunity to contribute their thoughts and to comment on any proposed developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes in the Main Drainage Channel of a Large Open Coast Managed Realignment Site
    Hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes in the main drainage channel of a large open coast managed realignment site Jonathan Dale1*, Heidi M. Burgess1, David J. Nash1,2 and Andrew B. Cundy3 1School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK. 2School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa. 3School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre (Southampton), Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK. *Corresponding Author: Jonathan Dale School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, UK, BN2 4GJ Email: [email protected] Published in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Volume 215, pp 100-111, 2018. Authors’ pre-print version Keywords Managed realignment; Hydrodynamics ; Suspended Sediment Concentration; Altimeter; Storms; United Kingdom, West Sussex, Medmerry Managed Realignment Site Abstract Managed Realignment (MR) is becoming increasingly popular with many coastal managers and engineers. Monitoring of MR sites has provided growing evidence that many of the saltmarshes created in these environments have lower biodiversity than naturally formed intertidal marshes, and may not fully deliver the anticipated ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration and coastal flood defence. Despite the importance of the sedimentary environment in developing an intertidal morphology suitable for plant establishment and succession, the evolution of the sediment erosion, transportation, deposition and consolidation cycle in newly breached sites is rarely examined. This study evaluates the hydrodynamics and concentration of suspended sediment exported and imported along the main drainage channel within the Medmerry Managed Realignment Site, West Sussex, UK, the largest open coast realignment in Europe (at the time of breaching).
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Aldsworth , F G, 1990 Recent observations on the tower of Holy Trinity Church, Bosham Sussex Archaeological Collections 128 Aldsworth , F G, 2000 The spire of Holy Trinity Church, Bosham, West Sussex Sussex Archaeological Collections 138 Allen, M J and Gardiner, J, 2000 Our Changing Coast – a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire, Council for British Archaeology CBA Report 124 Anon, 1943 Roman Britain in 1942 Journal of Roman Studies 33 Anon, ?1960s The Cobnor Trail – a brief guide for a walk round Cobnor, photocopied leaflet in CHC records Austin, B, Cox, D, and Upton, J, (eds) 1985 Sussex Industrial Archaeology. A field guide. Chichester: Phillimore. Bates, M R, Wenban-Smith, F, Briant, R, and Marshall, G, 2004 Palaeolithic Archaeology of the Sussex/Hampshire coastal corridor Beale, M, undated, Cobnor House, in excerpt of The Story of Cobnor, document in CHC records Beale, M, 2002 Cobnor Aerodrome, in Baldwin, O et al “We remember 1930-60” Chidham, Hambrook and Nutbourne Beatie-Edwards, M, and Webster, S, 2002 Hampshire Coastline, digital mapping of the historic coastline of Hampshire, unpublished Wessex Archaeology report Bedwin, O, 1980 Excavations at Chidham, Sussex Archaeological Collections 118 Bell, M G, Caseldine, A, and Neuman, H, 2000 Prehistoric intertidal archaeology and environments in the Severn Estuary, CBA report 120. York, Council for British Archaeology Beswick, M, 1993 Brick making in Sussex, a History and Gazetteer Middleton Press Bone, D A, 1985 The London Clay and associated
    [Show full text]
  • Coğrafya: Geçmiş-Kavramlar- Coğrafyacilar
    COĞRAFYA: GEÇMİŞ-KAVRAMLAR- COĞRAFYACILAR COĞRAFYA LİSANS PROGRAMI DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ATİLLA KARATAŞ İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ Yazar Notu Elinizdeki bu eser, İstanbul Üniversitesi Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Fakültesi’nde okutulmak için hazırlanmış bir ders notu niteliğindedir. İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ COĞRAFYA LİSANS PROGRAMI COĞRAFYA: GEÇMİŞ-KAVRAMLAR- COĞRAFYACILAR Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Atilla KARATAŞ ÖNSÖZ İstanbul Üniversitesi Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Fakültesi Coğrafya programı kapsamında, Coğrafya: Geçmiş-Kavramlar-Coğrafyacılar dersi için hazırlanmış olan bu notlar, ders içeriğinin daha iyi anlaşılması amacıyla internet üzerinde erişime açık görsellerle zenginleştirilmiş ve “Ders Notu” formunda düzenlenmiştir. Bu sebeple kurallarına uygun olarak yapılmakla birlikte metin içerisindeki alıntılar için ilgili bölümlerde referans verilmemiş, ancak çalışmanın sonundaki “Kaynakça” bölümünde faydalanılan kaynaklara ait bilgiler sıralanmıştır. Bu çalışmaya konu olmuş bütün bilim insanlarını minnet ve şükranla yâd eder, muhtemel eksik ve hatalar için okuyucunun anlayışına muhtaç olduğumuzun ikrarını elzem addederim. Öğrencilerimiz ve Coğrafya bilimine gönül vermiş herkes için faydalı olması ümidiyle… Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Atilla KARATAŞ 20.07.2017 1 İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ .............................................................................................................................................. 1 İÇİNDEKİLER .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sir John WESTON (B
    DOHP Interview Index and Biographical Details Sir John WESTON (b. 13 April 1938), CMG 1985, KCMG 1992 Biographical Details with (on right) relevant pages in the interview: Served with Royal Marines, 1956-58 pp 2-3 Entered Diplomatic Service (UN Dept), 1962 pp 3-6 Treasury Centre for Administrative Studies, 1964 pp 6-7 Chinese Language student, Hong Kong, 1964 pp 7-8 Peking, 1967 pp 8-20 FO (PUSD then E. European and Soviet Dept), 1969 p 21 Office of UK Permanent Representative to EEC, 1972 pp 21-27 Asst Private Sec. to Sec. of State, 1974 pp 27-32 (and see p 11) Counsellor, Head of EEC Presidency Secretariat, FCO, 1976 pp 32-3 Visiting Fellow, All Souls, Oxford, 1977 pp 34-7 Counsellor, Washington, 1978 pp 37-41 Head of Defence Dept, FCO, 1981 pp 41-45 Asst Under-Sec. of State, FCO, 1984 p 45 Minister, Paris, 1985 pp 46-9 Dep. Sec. to Cabinet, Cabinet Office, 1988 (secondment) pp 49-51 Dep. Under-Sec. of State (Defence) and Political Director, FCO, 1989 pp 51-55 UK Perm. Rep. to NATO, 1991 (also to Council of WEU, 1992) pp 55-7 British Permanent Representative to the United Nations, 1995 pp 57-60 (and p 20) Retired 1998 (reflects on career pp 60-62) 1 Sir John Weston Copyright: Sir John Weston It is Wednesday, 13 June 2001, and this is an interview by Liz Cox for the British Diplomatic Oral History Project with Sir John Weston. LC: “Right, Sir John. You went to Oxford and then you went into the Marines.” Sir John: “No, the other way round.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdham, Itchenor, Chichester, Church Norton and Selsey
    Holiday with a religious connection. West Sussex Day 7 – Birdham, Itchenor, Chichester, Church Norton and Selsey. Martin encounters the extraordinary ‘Macrocarpa’ tree in Birdham churchyard. BIRDHAM Friday 15th April 2016 was our last full day in West Sussex – it turned out to be very, very wet and not a day for long trips! However there were several locations of interest within 30 mins of Earnley, especially parish churches. The first church we explored was St James’, Birdham. The most striking feature outside the church was the Macrocarpa tree – it had the appearance of an ancient ash with a contorted knotted trunk. ‘Hesperocyparis macrocarpa’, commonly known as Monterey cypress, is a species of cypress native to the Central Coast of California - however the precise species is disputed and it may be an example of Italian Cypress (C. sempervirens). It was a nice surprise to find a variant on the ancient ash trees found in most old churchyards! The Macrocarpa tree is located in a very pretty churchyard at Birdham, featuring a bench with trellis arch. The parish church of St James, Birdham is situated on the Manhood Peninsula in Sussex. The area is a suburban extension of the city of Chichester, popular as a place to live and visit from its nearness to the city, Chichester Harbour and marina. The church was heavily restored in the nineteenth century, the then existing chancel being entirely replaced and the nave windows renewed. The sixteenth-century tower remains. The church has a Grade 1 listing. The gated porch at Birdham. East window, St James’, Birdham.
    [Show full text]
  • MRFCJ Business Plan: 2011
    Business Plan MRFCJ 2011 - 2014 1 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Context ................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 What is Climate Justice ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 The Climate Challenge .................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 The International Process ............................................................................................................. 5 3. Vision, mission and priorities .............................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Vision ....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Mission .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Strategic priorities ......................................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Expected outcomes ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.5 Activities and key performance indicators
    [Show full text]
  • Councillor Myself None 123 Cedar Drive Chichester, PO19 3EL None
    Transcript of the Members Register of Interest as at 09/04/15 Councillor Employment, office, trade, Sponsorship Contracts Land Licences Corporate Tenancies Securities 2 Any body to which I have been appointed Any body exercising functions of Any body directed to charitable purposes Any body one of whose principal profession or vacation or nominated by the Council a public nature (e.g. school purposes includes the influence of governing body or another public opinion or policy (including any council) political party or trade union) Any employment, office, trade, Any payment or provision of any other financial Any contract which is made between me or my Any beneficial interest 1 in land which Any licence (alone or jointly with Any tenancy where (to my knowledge) Any beneficial interest in securities of a body where - profession or vocation carried on for benfit (other than from Chichester District Council) spouse or partner * , or a firm in which either of is within the area of Chichester others) to occupy land in the area of - (a) the landlord is Chichester (a) that body (to my knowledge) has a place of business profit or gain made or provided within the period of 12 months us is a partner, or a body corporate of which District Council Chichester District Council for a District Council; and (b) the tenant is or land in the area of Chichester District Council; and ending today in respect of any expenses incurred by either of us is a director, or a body in the month or longer a body in which I or my spouse or (b)(i) the total nominal value of the securities exceeds me in carrying out duties as a member, or towards securities of which either of us has a beneficial partner* has a beneficial interest £25,000 or one hundredth of the total issued share my election expenses.
    [Show full text]