Joh an Na Ludwig L a Usan N E Joyce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joh an Na Ludwig L a Usan N E Joyce JOYCE JOHANNA LAUSANNE LUDWIG Photo by Gilles Weber 12 THE TUMOR ECOLOGIST Her ongoing investigation of how noncancerous cells in the microenvironment of tumors contribute to malignant growth, drug resistance and metastasis is also revealing how such relationships might be disrupted to treat cancer. Johanna Joyce was puzzled. The cause of As Joyce and her team reported in Nature her befuddlement: positive results from an Medicine in 2013, the glioma cells were experiment in a mouse model of glioma, an producing factors that helped macrophages aggressive brain cancer. survive the therapy. But the loss of the receptors’ signal, rather than killing the The year was 2012, and it was already tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), known that macrophages—immune cells had “reeducated” them, altering their gene that ordinarily gobble up cancer cells and expression programs to convert them back infectious agents—often turn traitor, multiply into cancer cell gourmands. within tumors and drive cancer progression. Joyce, who was at Memorial Sloan Kettering That study, with its scientific and Cancer Center (MSK) at the time, wanted therapeutic implications, put the Joyce to see what would happen if such turncoat laboratory on the map of tumor biology. macrophages in gliomas were targeted with In the years since, she and her lab have an inhibitor of the CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R), continued to expose the intricate interplay whose activity is normally essential to their between cancer cells and a motley crew survival. of noncancerous cells in the tumor microenvironment. In 2017, she and her “The results were striking,” says Joyce, team at Ludwig Lausanne reported in who joined the Ludwig Branch in Lausanne, Oncogene how macrophages help gliomas Switzerland, in 2016, where she is a Member. resist targeted drug therapy and how such “Even after treatment of just one week, we resistance might be overcome with CSF-1R saw a pretty dramatic regression of the inhibition. Another Joyce lab publication in tumors.” But what puzzled her was that the Cell Reports described a similar macrophage tumors were still teeming with macrophages. role in chemotherapy resistance. Finally, a 13 “It was teaching as teaching should be done. They taught us how to think about science through stories of how the discoveries happened. That made it so fascinating that you just wanted to learn more and more.” Nature Cell Biology publication elucidated Joyce’s honors thesis at Trinity, on genomic how obesity, through its effects on another imprinting—the regulation of a subset of type of immune cell, the neutrophil, drives genes depending on which parent they’re the spread of breast tumors to the lungs. inherited from—led directly to doctoral research in clinical genetics at Cambridge Student days University, in the laboratory of Paul Schofield. When Joyce was 14 years old, her parents There she explored how the faulty regulation moved her and her four younger siblings of imprinted genes causes Beckwith- from London to a farm they bought outside Wiedemann syndrome, which predisposes Dublin. Joyce’s omnivorous appetite for children to cancer. science intensified under the influence of the teachers at her new school— Into the microenvironment particularly, she recalls, an enthusiastic An urge to go beyond cancer genetics chemistry instructor named Mr. Bennett. and plunge deeper into the multicellular After finishing school, she enrolled in an complexity of cancer took Joyce to Douglas honors program in the natural sciences Hanahan’s laboratory, then at the University at Trinity College, in Dublin, where she of California, San Francisco, where she ultimately focused on genetics. “I thought started her postdoctoral studies in 1999. the inherent logic of it was quite beautiful,” Collaborating with the chemical biologist she says. Matthew Bogyo, Joyce explored how cathepsins—a family of protein-snipping The professors of genetics at Trinity, she molecular scissors—participate in multiple says, were the best teachers she ever aspects of pancreatic cancer progression. had. “They instilled in us an absolute love for genetics of all types,” she says. “It was Their studies also revealed that immune cells teaching as teaching should be done. are notably avid expressers of cathepsins. They taught us how to think about science “That early result,” says Joyce, “ultimately led through stories of how the discoveries me to focus on the roles of TAMs in cancer happened. That made it so fascinating that initiation, progression, invasion and response you just wanted to learn more and more, to therapy, and so it set the stage for the and enjoyed going to the classes so much. whole program that I developed in my own It’s something I try, to the extent I can, to lab in New York and that continues here in bring into how I teach my own students.” Lausanne.” 14 Photo by Eric Déroze After joining MSK in 2004, Joyce expanded about half of the gliomas in mice became her studies to investigate TAMs in breast resistant to the CSF-1R inhibitor and every cancer and, later, in gliomas, ultimately tumor that recurred did so in the context of leading to the Nature Medicine paper on a scar. “We identified a prominent and quite CSF-1R inhibition and TAM reprogramming. complex resistance mechanism involving many different cell types within these “That was a different way of thinking about treated lesions that ultimately led to the targeting the tumor microenvironment,” says reemergence of glioma cell proliferation and Joyce. “You don’t necessarily want to deplete invasion,” says Joyce. these and other immune cells in cancers because they have critical housekeeping Prolonged treatment with the anti-CSF-1R functions. But by re-educating them so that drug in the context of recurrent disease they can again execute those functions we prompted macrophages to adopt a wound could potentially get better therapeutic healing response. That includes secreting outcomes.” growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which they do in response to Resolving resistance another factor (interleukin-4) produced by But would the effect last? Or would gliomas, infiltrating T cells of the immune system. IGF- among the wiliest of malignancies, develop 1, for its part, activates a signaling pathway resistance? in the cancer cells that drives their growth—a pathway mediated by a protein named PI-3 In a 2016 paper published in Science after kinase (PI3K). The CSF-1R resistance, the Joyce joined Ludwig Lausanne, she and researchers showed, could be overcome with her colleagues addressed those questions. drugs that block the receptor for IGF-1 or They found that after prolonged treatment, PI3K activity. Combining either with 15 Photo by Gilles Weber CSF-1R blockade extended survival in a susceptible to the cancer cell-targeted mouse model. inhibitors. Restorative interventions “We used the knowledge we had of Like many other cancers, gliomas are driven macrophages and of CSF-1R signaling in large part by the unbridled activity of a and inhibition to overcome this diverse and ubiquitous clan of signaling microenvironment-mediated resistance to enzymes known as tyrosine kinases. But therapy—something we and others are finding drugs that inhibit various kinases have had is extremely important to the efficacy of little or no effect on gliomas. Joyce and her multiple therapies in many different cancers,” team noticed, however, that tyrosine kinase says Joyce. inhibitors were nonetheless very effective in killing glioma cells in culture. “Whenever Indeed, she and her group had already shown you see something like that, it grabs your in 2011 that treating breast cancer with Taxol attention,” says Joyce. tends to boost TAM numbers, which drives resistance to chemotherapy. In 2017, her It suggested, for one thing, that the observed laboratory demonstrated in a Cell Reports drug resistance might stem from the tumor paper that macrophages also secrete factors microenvironment. In 2017, Joyce and her that interfere directly with Taxol’s effects on team reported in Oncogene that inhibiting cancer cells—which is to force an extended CSF-1R with a drug could restore sensitivity arrest during cell division that prompts their to other tyrosine kinase inhibitors in mouse suicide. TAMs, Joyce and her colleagues models. In this case, they showed, the found, shortened the duration of the mitotic reprogramming of TAMs by CSF-1R inhibition arrest induced by Taxol. They also showed was directly involved in making gliomas that inhibiting a signaling pathway involved 16 in this interference, mediated by a protein named MEK, could restore sensitivity to Taxol. “We have established Prep work some fantastic While at MSK, Joyce’s team had held joint meetings with the laboratory of Andrew collaborations with CHUV Dannenberg, a colleague at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York. Dannenberg and his team were interested in the link between to perform immune cell obesity and different cancers, including breast cancer; Joyce and her team were landscaping in every particularly intrigued by the effects of obesity on systemic inflammation and potential brain malignancy that connections to metastasis. With a shared expertise in TAMs, the is operated on in the researchers looked at the effects of obesity on these cells first. But they quickly hospital.” noticed that neutrophils—another type of immune cell—were more intimately linked to inflammation in the obese. “We found that in the normal lung, outside of the context be incorporated into the ambitious cancer
Recommended publications
  • Ludwig Institute Consolidated Financial Report for 2012
    Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd Statutory Financial Statements 2012 Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Zurich Report of the Statutory Auditor on the Financial Statements to the General Meeting of Shareholders Financial Statements 2012 KPMG AG Zurich, May 14, 2013 - 8 - Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd - 9 - Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd - 10 - Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2012 USD CHF 2012 2011 2012 2011 Assets Current assets Liquid funds (Notes 1 & 2) 22,138,495 15,385,587 20,265,932 14,387,043 Fixed term deposits (Notes 1 & 2) 6,439,223 14,765,382 5,894,618 13,806,828 Other receivables - Third parties 2,640,414 3,461,456 2,417,059 3,236,845 External funding 3,888,612 3,411,279 3,559,672 3,189,902 Prepayments and accrued income 3,120,349 2,681,977 2,856,387 2,507,918 Total current assets 38,227,093 39,705,681 34,993,668 37,128,536 Fixed assets Financial fixed assets - Investments (Note 4) 7,080,599 5,103,000 6,481,635 4,771,815 Other (Notes 1 & 5) 1,517,679 1,987,090 1,389,319 1,858,180 Total fixed assets 8,598,278 7,090,090 7,870,954 6,629,995 Total assets 46,825,371 46,795,771 42,864,622 43,758,531 Liabilities and Net worth Current liabilities Accounts payable - third parties (Note 7) 8,873,562 10,624,684 8,122,981 9,935,143 Accruals (Note 1) 6,507,197 7,514,082 5,956,785 7,026,474 Provisions (Notes 1 & 8) 5,839,674 5,860,811 5,345,653 5,480,518 Deferred income (Notes 1 & 10) 6,887,424 10,096,102 6,304,919 9,441,140 Total current liabilities 28,107,857 34,095,679
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Institute Consolidated Financial Report for 2019
    Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Zurich Report of the Statutory Auditor on the Consolidated Financial Statements to the General Meeting of Shareholders Consolidated Financial Statements 2019 KPMG AG Zurich, May 22, 2020 KPMG AG Audit Räffelstrasse 28 PO Box Telephone +41 58 249 31 31 CH-8045 Zurich CH-8036 Zurich Internet www.kpmg.ch Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting of Shareholders of Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, Zurich Report of the Statutory Auditor on the Consolidated Financial Statements As statutory auditor, we have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd, which comprise the balance sheet, income statement, statement of cash flows, statement of capital changes and notes for the year ended December 31, 2019. Board of Directors’ Responsibility The board of directors is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with Swiss GAAP FER and the requirements of Swiss law. This responsibility includes designing, implementing and maintaining an internal control system relevant to the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. The board of directors is further responsible for selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Swiss law and Swiss Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Cleveland Shows How Research in Neuroscience Is Leading to New Approaches to Treat Brain Cancer
    18 INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH Ludwig Cancer Research has a long tradition of nurturing investigators who see connections among different fi elds. The work of Ludwig scientist Don Cleveland shows how research in neuroscience is leading to new approaches to treat brain cancer. 19 TECHNIQUE TO VANQUISH DISEASE IN NERVOUS SYSTEM APPLIED TO CANCER Richard Smith, a neurologist who has a roster of patients with neurodegenerative disease, would not leave Ludwig scientist Don Cleveland alone. Cleveland’s laboratory at Ludwig San Diego had the means to test an idea to help people with Don Cleveland amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also called Lou Gehrig’s disease), whom Smith saw regularly at his San Diego clinic. “He was relentless in badgering me,” recalls Cleveland of their interactions in 2005. The idea was to silence a gene that is mutated in a proportion of inherited ALS cases, caused by mutation in SOD-1 (superoxide dismutase 1), in the hope that quelling the bad gene could also quell disease. To silence the gene, Smith suggested using an antisense oligonucleotide, a small piece of single-stranded DNA. It was designed to destroy the gene’s mRNA, a molecular intermediary between the gene and the protein it encodes. Smith proposed testing the oligonucleotide in animals with a pump that would infuse the DNA drug directly into the cerebrospinal fl uid, essentially bathing the brain and spinal cord in it. To work, the drug needed to be taken up by the motor neurons. Cleveland didn’t think this would happen. But Smith, who later spent two years in Cleveland’s lab working on the project, argued that they had nothing to lose.
    [Show full text]
  • LUDWIG LINK | NOVEMBER 2013 Irector of Communications Irector Steinhardt Achel Positive
    LUDWIG LINK NOVEMBER 2013 IN THIS ISSUE 3 | Oxford Report 11 | Irv Weissman Q&A News from the Ludwig A conversation with the scientific retreat Ludwig Stanford director Continued inside > LUDWIG LINK | NOVEMBER 2013 1 LUDWIG LINK NOVEMBER 2013 LETTER Fall is an ideal time to refresh the mind and engage in creative new thinking and direction. TABLE OF CONTENTS And last month started off on a high note, with a Ludwig retreat Meeting Notes 3 in Oxford that packed three Getting to know you days with information sharing 3 Abracadabra and networking. The caliber 4 of the content, speakers and attendees was amazing Company News in itself. It was an unparalleled opportunity to foster 4 interactions and collaborations among some of the most Well designed 4 distinguished researchers from around the world. News Roundup 5 The passion was palpable from the presentations to the Buyer beware 5 coffee breaks and after-hour conversations. Off-site Dark horse 5 meetings encourage out-of-the-box thinking because Don’t delete 6 being in unfamiliar surroundings can break old habits Sn(i)ps 7 and generate energy, leading to fresh ideas and deeper Fickle finger of cell fate 7 LUDWIG LINK | NOVEMBER 2013 thinking. The splice of life 8 Eats, shoots and leaves 9 And the feedback couldn’t have been more positive. “The retreat offered me an incredible opportunity to Ask a Scientist 10 foster new and deeper collaborations with other Ludwig labs. It felt like the cancer biologist’s version of AC/DC’s Q&A with Irv Weissman 11 greatest hits album!” said Adriel Cha of Ludwig Stanford.
    [Show full text]
  • LUDWIG LINK | JULY 2014 Director of Communications Director Steinhardt Rachel Sincerely, Reading! Happy More Prizes
    LUDWIG LINK 2014 | JULY IN THIS ISSUE LUDWIG 8 | News Roundup 14 | Q&A Bird virus boosts Peter Gibbs of Ludwig LINK effectiveness of Melbourne-WEHI on immunotherapy effort inspiration and science JULY 2014 Continued inside > 1 LUDWIG LINK JULY 2014 LETTER Antoine-Augustin Parmentier got one in 1773 for identifying a vegetable that could ease TABLE OF CONTENTS famines, and popularized the potato in France. About a Awards and distinctions 3 century and a half later, Charles Cancer’s worst enemy 3 Lindbergh got one for flying Turbocharged team 3 from New York to Paris, and Inspired immunotherapist 4 revolutionized the business of aviation. More recently, A new chief 4 the X Prize Foundation used one to kick off a commercial Nonpareil class 5 space race. Meeting notes 6 A prize is what each of them got. Prizes inspire human achievement at least as much as they celebrate it. And Omne trium perfectum 6 they give the rest of us an opportunity to tip our collective hats to the intrepid, the inspired and the awe-inspiring. News roundup 7 Real hope for real change 7 In this issue you’ll read about 13 Ludwig scientists who Of birds and men 8 dared to ask big questions. Each of the awards won by our Developmental disorders 8 LUDWIG LINK 2014 | JULY researchers this year recognizes significant contributions Clairvoyant 9 to cancer research or therapy. Taken together, they serve Making headway 10 as testament to the high caliber of Ludwig research and DNA detectives 10 the dedication of its scientists. Break repair 11 The nuclear option 12 We also asked three young Ludwig researchers from around the world how prizes impact science.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Progress Report and 2019 Update
    2018 Progress Report and 2019 Update Defeat GBM Research Collaborative Key Personnel: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS • Tim Cloughesy, MD A NOTE FROM THE CEO University of California, Los Angeles • John de Groot, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center Over the past five years, the Defeat GBM Research Collaborative has stood as a testament to the power of ideas, collaboration, and the philanthropic partnership • Frank Furnari, PhD between patient advocacy nonprofits like NBTS and a dedicated community of Ludwig Cancer Research, supporters. University of California, San Diego • Dimpy Koul, PhD When we launched Defeat GBM as our flagship research initiative in 2014, we MD Anderson Cancer Center sought to do something different. Decades of grant-making in the traditional form of funding separate, individual research projects (one- to two-year grants • Ingo Mellinghoff, MD to a single Principle Investigator) had produced extraordinary knowledge of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center biology of glioblastoma cells, but not nearly enough of this work was primed to • Paul Mischel, MD move out of research laboratories and into clinical trials for patients. Ludwig Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego NBTS wanted to see what could be accomplished if, instead of continuing this traditional model of research funding, we deep-funded a team of expert • Erik Sulman, MD, PhD researchers, over a five-year period, to work collaboratively. This team would be NYU Langone’s Perlmutter charged with working across the continuum of research to translate a scientific Cancer Center discovery into an actionable treatment strategy and/or medical product that could • Roel Verhaak, PhD be tested in clinical trials, and hopefully become an approved new therapeutic The Jackson Laboratory option for patients.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Research Highlights
    2019 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS LIFE-CHANGING SCIENCE 1 2 WELCOME Welcome to the Ludwig 2019 Research Highlights Report. As we do every year, we’ve selected a handful of recent discoveries and advances made by Edward A. researchers affiliated with Ludwig Cancer Research and woven the stories behind each into McDermott Jr. President and profiles of the scientists responsible for them. Chief Executive Officer The intention is to illustrate the depth and breadth of Ludwig’s life-changing science. But the stories told in this report also speak to the human side of science—the aspirations and fascinations that drive scientific research, the relationships that fuel its progress—as much as the fundamental challenges of cancer biology and care. Beyond that, they illustrate the truly global scope of the scientific effort to defeat cancer. You will thus read here about the improbable journey of a boy living hand-to-mouth in a coastal Chi Van Dang Chinese village to a U.S. university and on to the frontiers of medical nanotechnology, where Scientific his inventions, now in clinical trials, are putting a new twist on chemo- and radiotherapy. Director You’ll learn about how a bright young girl from California moved to aid children with Down syndrome grew into an inspired clinical neurologist whose research is bringing new hope to kids diagnosed with an intractable brain cancer and people afflicted by the cognitive decline caused by chemotherapy. Another profile charts the path taken by a British nephrologist to a landmark discovery of how cells sense and respond to oxygen—a system of profound significance in cancer—and his recent identification of a second, evolutionarily ancient cellular oxygen sensor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Presence at 2016 AACR Annual Meeting
    Ludwig Presence at 2016 AACR Annual Meeting Ludwig Scientist (s) Affiliation (s) Session Time Location Session Type Session Title Presentation/Abstract Title & Time SATURDAY, APRIL 16 Using Tumor Biology to Drive Room 288, Morial Convention 9:30am - 9:55am: Immunotherapies for Sarcoma: Crystal Mackall Ludwig Stanford 8:00am - 10:00am Educational Session More Effective Sarcoma Center Progress and Challenges Therapy Room 278, Morial Convention Cancer Immunology for the Crystal Mackall Ludwig Stanford 10:15am -12:15pm Educational Session 10:15am - 12:15pm: Education Manuscript Center Non-Immunologist: Tutorial SUNDAY, APRIL 17 Ovarian cancer Room 343, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert George Coukos Ludwig Lausanne 7:00am - 8:00am immunotherapy. From bench Invited speaker Center Session to bedside Cellular Plasticity, Cellular Room 288, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert Xin Lu Ludwig Oxford 7:00am - 8:00am Heterogeneity and Single Cell Invited speaker Center Session Sequencing Stapled Peptides as a New Room 357, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert Form of Medicine for David Lane Ludwig New York 7:00am - 8:00am Invited speaker Center Session Oncology Targets: Challenges and Progress Room 271, Morial Convention Meet-the-Expert The Role of Metabolism in Matthew Vander Heiden Ludwig MIT 7:00am - 8:00am Invited speaker Center Session Supporting Tumor Growth Thirteenth Annual AACR Award for Lifetime Bob Weinberg Ludwig MIT 8:15am - 9:00am Hall F, Morial Convention Center Awards and Lectures Award recipient Achievement in Cancer Research Thirty-Sixth
    [Show full text]
  • Consummate Neuro-Oncologist
    THE CONSUMMATE NEURO-ONCOLOGIST Michelle Monje’s teenage project to aid the disabled led her to neurology and a research career that’s bringing new hope for the treatment of childhood brain cancers and the mind-fog caused by chemotherapy. Competitive figure skating was once a big abiding interest in neurology. In keeping part of Michelle Monje’s life. By the time she with her mother’s advice, Monje has over was in middle school in the Bay Area of San the past quarter century made significant Francisco, Monje was squeezing in as many contributions to our understanding of as 35 hours of practice every week at the the brain’s postnatal plasticity and the rink. Then her mother, who’d started at IBM in neurological disorders caused by cancer the late 60’s as a computer programmer and therapies. She has also led the charge worked her way up to the executive ranks, against a swiftly lethal childhood cancer of had a little chat with her. “She pointed out the brainstem known as diffuse intrinsic that dedicating that much time to a sport pontine glioma (DIPG), charting new was great,” Monje recalls, “but perhaps I approaches to the treatment of the long- should also think about how I’m going to be neglected cancer and other high-grade productive and contribute to the rest of the gliomas that she is now—or soon will be— world.” Just 13 at the time, Monje mulled evaluating in clinical trials. the matter for a spell and came up with a precociously fitting answer: She created In 2018, Monje and her colleagues reported a figure skating program for children with in Cell their dissection of the cellular Down syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Cavenee, Who Study the Diverse Cellular Mechanisms That Drive Cancer
    24 COMBINATION Ludwig Cancer Research has long fostered research in several core areas. These include the study of melanoma, brain tumors and, more broadly, immunotherapy— research on how to modulate the immune system to attack tumors. Ludwig’s emphasis on these core areas has led to a multipronged view of tumors, fostering the development of therapies that can be used in combination. This approach may counteract cancer more effectively than any single treatment used in isolation. 25 TAPPING INTO NEW TARGETS FOR BRAIN CANCER If any tumor type is a candidate for combination therapy, it is glioblastoma multiforme. This aggressive brain cancer defi es most treatment strategies. Chemotherapy barely touches it, and drugs that target cancer-causing cellular molecules are also remarkably ineffective in treating it. Median survival is 15 months after diagnosis. Ludwig has long supported research programs to tackle this disease. Recently, physician-scientist Paul Mischel, a former faculty member at the University of California, Los Angeles, was recruited to the Ludwig San Diego team. He Paul Mischel has helped design and lead molecular analysis in fi ve clinical trials of therapies targeting cancer-related cellular molecules. Mischel’s expertise complements a team with strengths in basic research. It includes geneticist Frank Furnari and Ludwig San Diego director Web Cavenee, who study the diverse cellular mechanisms that drive cancer. Mischel’s move to Ludwig last fall was a natural evolution of an ongoing long- distance interaction with Furnari and Cavenee. “We have shared interests and complementary approaches,” says Mischel. “The synergies among us were Frank Furnari so great that it made sense to work closer together.” One of the trio’s most recent projects delved into why two drugs designed to inhibit a cellular molecule called epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) work poorly in patients with glioblastoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Benoît Ludwig Brussels Van Den Eynde
    VAN DEN EYNDE BENOÎT BRUSSELS LUDWIG Photo by Flynn Larsen 24 THE TUMOR DEFENSE DISMANTLER He began his career helping to lay the scientific groundwork for modern immunotherapy. Now he’s unraveling the myriad ways tumors thwart immune attack—and showing how to undo those defenses. In science, as in many other things, it’s the researchers expected the antigen would surprises that tend to stick with you—and be a randomly mutated version of a normal sometimes in more ways than one. gene—a neoantigen—which would appear foreign to T cells, provoking attack. “To Benoît Van den Eynde got a big one nearly our surprise, the antigen turned out to be three decades ago, while working with identical to the normal gene,” recalls Ludwig Thierry Boon, the founding director of the Member Van den Eynde. “We called it P1A Brussels Branch of the Ludwig Institute and realized quite quickly that the gene is for Cancer Research. Boon had previously expressed in the tumor but mostly silent shown in a series of milestone studies in the in normal tissues.” Reported in 1991, it was late 70s and early 80s that the mammalian the first of what would come to be called immune system can detect and clear cancer, the “MAGE-type” or “cancer testis” antigens, a possibility most scientists doubted at the which are expressed in human cancers as time. By the mid-80s, his team was racing to well and would become central to several find in mice and humans the first example immunotherapy strategies. of a naturally occurring cancer antigen, a molecular flag that marks diseased cells for P1A, for its part, stuck around as a useful targeting by T cells of the immune system.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Hunter
    THE CANCER HUNTER Nickolas Papadopoulos’ early fascination with molecular genetics fueled a career-long adventure mapping cancer genomes, unearthing cancer genes and devising tests for the minimally invasive detection of cancer. Nickolas Papadopoulos was about as gathered a few people in a little room outside surprised as he was relieved to hear the his office that we called the kitchen—a voice on the other end of the line when he refrigerator, small tables and a whiteboard,” answered his lab phone one afternoon in the Papadopoulos recalls. “He said, ‘OK, now summer of 1992. The voice belonged to Bert you’re going to present your work to us.’ ” Vogelstein, a man he had never met before Vogelstein brushed off his protests, saying and to whom he had sent his one and only it wouldn’t be a problem if he knew his application for a postdoctoral position. If he stuff. After the presentation and a little didn’t get it, Papadopoulos was ready to fly Q&A, he had someone show Papadopoulos home to his native Greece. He had labored around the lab. When he returned, he found and fussed over his letter to the up-and- Vogelstein hammering out a letter on his coming cancer geneticist, but the fact was electric typewriter. The job would start in he had no experience, let alone publications, a few months, it said; Papadopoulos had in the field. Fortunately, Vogelstein had to promise he wouldn’t even interview ignored that deficiency and was now inviting elsewhere. him over for an interview. Just come over, he said.
    [Show full text]